One powerful future.

3500 Series
vs.
Cummins & SDMO (MTU/Mitsubishi)

50 hz Competitive Comparison

Page 1
 Ratings Considered

50 Hz, Prime 50 hz, Standby

Cat kVA kVA
3516C HD 2,500 2,750
3516B 2,000 2,250
3512B HD 1,600 1,750
3512B 1,500 1,600
3512 1,275 1,400

Page 2
 Competition

Nodes SDMO
Cat Cummins
(Prime, kVA) MTU Mitsubishi
2,500 3516C HD C2750 D5 X2800 -
2,000 3516B C2250 D5 X2200 T2200
1,600 3512B HD C1760 D5e X1850 T1900
1,500 3512B C1675 D5A X1650 T1650C
1,275 3512 C1400 D5 X1250 T1400

Page 3
 One powerful future.

Fuel Consumption Adjustments

Page 4
 Fuel Specifications

• Tolerance - Possible deviation from published

value; given in %
• Mass – Weight of fuel used in specifications;
given in g/l with a higher value implying more
heat energy
• LHV (Lower Heating Value) – The LHV
represents the amount of heat released during
fuel combustion and is used as a standard for
the fuel’s chemical composition; given in kJ/kg
with a higher value implying more heat energy

Page 5
 Adjustments to Fuel Consumption

Cat Cummins MTU Mitsubishi

Tolerance +/-3% +5% +5% +/-5%
Adjustment 1.02 1.02 1
Mass (g/l) 838.9 850 850
Adjustment 1.0335 1.02 1.0132
LHV (kJ/kg) 42,780 42,800
Adjustment 1.0335 1.02 1.0132

Page 6
 Adjusted Fuel Consumption Example
(3512 vs C1400 D5 @ 100% Load)

Cat Cummins
Published (L/hr) 264.6 261.0
Adjustment 1.0335
Adjusted (L/hr) 264.6 269.7

Page 7
 One powerful future.

Comparisons

Page 8
 3516C HD vs. C2750 D5

3516C HD C2750 D5
50 hz, PP (kVA) 2,500 2,500
50 hz, SB (kVA) 2,750 2,750
Engine 3516C HD QSK78G9
Disp (L) 78.1 77.6
Cooling Amb ( oC) 50 40
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 6.1
Alternator 1866 LVSI804R
150C Rise (kVA) 3,000 2,575
Motor Start (skVA) 6,187 3,550
Wght (kg) 18,824 19,996
Power Density (kVA/kg) 0.133 0.125

Page 9
 3516C HD vs. C2750 D5
Why Buys

• Higher Ambient Capability: 50 vs. 40oC

Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 6.1 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 3,000 vs. 2,575 kVA
Durability, eliminates need to oversize
• Better Motor Starting: 6,187 vs. 3,550 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Lower Mass: 0.133 vs. 0.125 kVA/kg
Lower handling & structural costs

Page 10
 3516C HD vs. X2800

3516C HD X2800
50 hz, PP (kVA) 2,500 2,545
50 hz, SB (kVA) 2,750 2,800
Engine 3516C HD 20V4000G23F
Disp (L) 78.1 95.3
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 4.9
Alternator 1866 53S75
150C Rise (kVA) 3,000 2,910
Motor Start (skVA) 6,187 5,320

Page 11
 3516C HD vs. X2800
Why Buys

• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 4.9 kPA

Lower cost exhaust system
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 3,000 vs. 2,910 kVA
Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 6,187 vs. 5,320 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive

Page 12
 3516B vs. C2250 D5

3516B C2250 D5
50 hz, PP (kVA) 2,000 2,000
50 hz, SB (kVA) 2,250 2,250
Engine 3516B QSK60G4
Disp (L) 69.0 60.2
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,709 1,730
BMEP (PP) (bar) 19.8 23.0
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,931 1,915
BMEP (SB) (bar) 22.4 25.4
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 394.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 407.2
Cooling Amb ( oC) 50 40
Alternator 1647 PI734G
Motor Start (skVA) 5,865 3,250
Wght (kg) 12,594 14,863
L (cm) 6,009 6,175
W (cm) 2,286 2,286
H (cm) 2,342 2,537
Footprint (m2) 13.7 14.1
Power Density (kVA/m2) 145.6 141.7
Power Density (kVA/kg) 0.159 0.135
Page 13
 3516B vs. C2250 D5
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP:
19.8 vs. 23.0 bar (Prime)
22.4 vs. 25.4 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
406.5 vs 407.2 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Ambient Capability: 50 vs. 40oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Better Motor Starting: 5,865 vs. 3,250 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 145.6 vs. 141.7 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space
• Lower Mass: 0.159 vs. 0.135 kVA/kg
Lower handling & structural costs

Page 14
 3516B vs. X2200

3516B X2200
50 hz, PP (kVA) 2,000 2,000
50 hz, SB (kVA) 2,250 2,200
Engine 3516B 16V4000G23F
Disp (L) 69.0 76.3
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 309.2 306.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 401.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 309.2 312.3
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 409.2
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 4.9
Alternator 1647 512M60
150C Rise (kVA) 2,279 2,155
Motor Start (skVA) 5,865 4,650
Wght (kg) 12,594 13,280
Power Density (kVA/kg) 0.159 0.151

Page 15
 3516B vs. X2200
Why Buys

• Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:

309.2 vs 312.3 l/hr (75%)
406.5 vs 409.2 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 4.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 2,279 vs. 2,155 kVA
Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 5,865 vs. 4,650 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Lower Mass: 0.159 vs. 0.151 kVA/kg
Lower handling & structural costs

Page 16
 3516B vs. T2200

3516B T2200
50 hz, PP (kVA) 2,000 2,000
50 hz, SB (kVA) 2,250 2,200
Engine 3516B S16R-PTAA2
Disp (L) 69.0 65.4
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,709 1,723
BMEP (PP) (bar) 19.8 21.1
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,931 1,895
BMEP (SB) (bar) 22.4 23.2
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 309.2 307.3
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 401.7
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 309.2 311.4
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 406.5 407.0
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 5.9
Alternator 1647 512M60
150C Rise (kVA) 2,279 2,155
Motor Start (skVA) 5,865 4,650
Wght (kg) 12,594 14,305
Power Density (kVA/kg) 0.159 0.140
Page 17
 3516B vs. T2200
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP:
19.8 vs. 21.1 bar (Prime)
22.4 vs. 23.2 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
309.2 vs 311.4 l/hr (75%)
406.5 vs 407.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 5.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 2,279 vs. 2,155 kVA
Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 5,865 vs. 4,650 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Lower Mass: 0.159 vs. 0.140 kVA/kg
Lower handling & structural costs

Page 18
 3512B HD vs. C1760 D5e

3512B HD C1760 D5e

50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,600 1,600
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,750 1,760
Engine 3512B HD QSK60GS3
Disp (L) 58.6 60.2
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,371 1,620
BMEP (PP) (bar) 18.7 21.5
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,497 1,835
BMEP (SB) (bar) 20.4 24.4
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 250.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 323.8 335.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 258.4
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 323.8 346.2
Cooling Amb ( oC) 53 40
Alternator 1602 PI734D
150C Rise (kVA) 1,908 1,720
Motor Start (skVA) 4,266 3,125
Wght (kg) 14,520 15,072
L (cm) 5,462 6,175
W (cm) 2,091 2,494
H (cm) 2,367 3,422
Footprint (m2) 11.4 15.4
Power Density (kVA/m2) 140.1 103.9
Power Density (kVA/kg) 0.110 0.106
Page 19
 3512B HD vs. C1760 D5e
Why Buys

• Lower BMEP:
18.7 vs. 21.5 bar (Prime)
20.4 vs. 24.4 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Fuel Consumption:
245.5 vs 250.0 l/hr (75%)
323.8 vs 335.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
245.5 vs 250.0 l/hr (75%)
323.8 vs 335.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy

Page 20
 3512B HD vs. C1760 D5e
Why Buys

• Higher Ambient Capability: 53 vs. 40 oC

Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 1,908 vs. 1,720 kVA
Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 4,266 vs. 3,125 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 140.1 vs. 103.9 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space
• Lower Mass: 0.110 vs. 0.106 kVA/kg
Lower handling & structural costs

Page 21
 3512B HD vs. X1850

3512B HD X1850
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,600 1,664
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,750 1,830
Engine 3512B HD 12V4000G23F
Disp (L) 58.6 57.2
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,371 1,432
BMEP (PP) (bar) 18.7 20.0
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,497 1,575
BMEP (SB) (bar) 20.4 22.0
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 241.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 245.9
Cooling Amb ( oC) 53 50
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 4.9
Alternator 1602 512S55
Motor Start (skVA) 4,266 3,950
Page 22
 3512B HD vs. X1850
Why Buys

• Lower BMEP:
18.7 vs. 20.0 bar (Prime)
20.4 vs. 22.0 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
245.5 vs 245.9 l/hr (75%)
• Higher Ambient Capability: 54 vs. 50oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 4.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Better Motor Starting: 4,266 vs. 3,950 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive

Page 23
 3512B HD vs. T1900

3512B HD T1900
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,600 1,727
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,750 1,900
Engine 3512B HD S16R-PTA
Disp (L) 58.6 65.4
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 266.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 323.8 353.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 245.6 269.5
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 323.8 357.7
Cooling Amb (oC) 53 50
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 5.9
Alternator 1602 512S55
Motor Start (skVA) 4,266 3,950
L (cm) 5,462 5,497
W (cm) 2,091 2,286
H (cm) 2,367 2,479
Footprint (m2) 11.4 12.6
Power Density (kVA/m2) 140.1 137.4
Page 24
 3512B HD vs. T1900
Why Buys
• Lower Fuel Consumption:
245.5 vs 266.0 l/hr (75%)
323.8 vs 353.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
245.5 vs 269.5 l/hr (75%)
323.8 vs 357.7 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Ambient Capability: 55 vs. 50oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 5.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Better Motor Starting: 4,266 vs. 3,950 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 140.1 vs. 137.4 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space

Page 25
 3512B vs. C1675 D5A

3512B C1675 D5A

50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,500 1,500
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,600 1,675
Engine 3512B KTA50GS8
Disp (L) 51.8 50.3
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,384 1,429
BMEP (SB) (bar) 21.4 22.7
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 240.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 308.8 302.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 248.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 308.8 312.1
Cooling Amb (oC) 49 40
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 6.2
Alternator 1468 PI734D
Motor Start (skVA) 4,282 3,125
L (cm) 5,351 5,690
W (cm) 1,975 2,033
H (cm) 2,342 2,330
Footprint (m2) 10.6 11.6
Power Density (kVA/m2) 142.0 129.7
Page 26
 3512B vs. C1675 D5A
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP: 21.4 vs. 22.8 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Fuel Consumption: 232.5 vs 240.0 l/hr (75%)
Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
232.5 vs 248.0 l/hr (75%)
308.8 vs 312.1 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Ambient Capability: 49 vs. 40oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 6.2 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Better Motor Starting: 4,282 vs. 3,125 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 142.0 vs. 129.7 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space

Page 27
 3512B vs. X1650

3512B X1650
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,500 1,500
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,600 1,650
Engine 3512B 12V4000G23R2/43
Disp (L) 51.8 57.2
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 231.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 235.7
Cooling Amb ( oC) 49 40
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 4.9
Alternator 1468 502VL10
Motor Start (skVA) 4,282 4,225

Page 28
 3512B vs. X1650
Why Buys

• Higher Ambient Capability: 49 vs. 40oC

Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 4.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system
• Better Motor Starting: 4,282 vs. 4,225 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive

Page 29
 3512B vs. T1650C
3512B T1650C
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,500 1,500
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,600 1,650
Engine 3512B S12R-F1PTAW
Disp (L) 51.8 49.0
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,305 1,329
BMEP (PP) (bar) 20.2 21.7
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,384 1,462
BMEP (SB) (bar) 21.4 23.9
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 240.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 308.8 320.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 232.5 243.2
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 308.8 324.2
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 5.9
Alternator 1468 502L8
150C Rise (kVA) 1,622 1,575
Motor Start (skVA) 4,282 3,600
L (cm) 5,351 5,090
W (cm) 1,975 2,200
H (cm) 2,342 2,510
Footprint (m2) 10.6 11.2
Power Density (kVA/m2) 142.0 134.0
Page 30
 3512B vs. T1650C
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP:
20.2 vs. 21.7 bar (Prime)
21.4 vs. 23.9 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Fuel Consumption:
232.5 vs 240.0 l/hr (75%)
308.8 vs 320.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
232.5 vs 243.2 l/hr (75%)
308.8 vs 324.2 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy

Page 31
 3512B vs. T1650C
Why Buys

• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 5.9 kPA

Lower cost exhaust system
• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 1,622 vs. 1,575 kVA
Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 4,282 vs. 3,600 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 142.0 vs. 129.7 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space

Page 32
 3512 vs. C1400 D5

3512 C1400 D5
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,275 1,250
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,400 1,400
Engine 3512 KTA50G3
Disp (L) 51.8 50.3
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,082 1,097
BMEP (PP) (bar) 16.7 17.4
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,205 1,228
BMEP (SB) (bar) 18.6 19.5
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 203.2 199.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 264.6 261.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 203.2 205.7
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 264.6 269.7
Cooling Amb ( oC) 53 40
Alternator 1445 PI734B
Motor Start (skVA) 3,087 2,500
L (cm) 5,237 5,105
W (cm) 1,975 2,000
H (cm) 3,673 2,238
Footprint (m2) 10.3 10.2
Power Density (kVA/m2) 123.3 122.4
Page 33
 3512 vs. C1400 D5
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP:
16.7 vs. 17.4 bar (Prime)
18.6 vs. 19.3 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
203.2 vs 205.7 l/hr (75%)
264.6 vs 269.7 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Ambient Capability: 53 vs. 40oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Better Motor Starting: 3,087 vs. 2,500 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 123.3 vs. 122.4 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space

Page 34
 3512 vs. X1250

3512 X1250
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,275 1,136
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,400 1,250
Engine 3512 18V2000G65F
Disp (L) 51.8 35.8
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,082 1,000
BMEP (PP) (bar) 16.7 22.3
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,205 1,100
BMEP (SB) (bar) 18.6 24.6
Cooling Amb (oC) 53 46
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 4.9
Alternator 1445 502M6
150C Rise (kVA) 1,405 1,315
Motor Start (skVA) 3,087 2,700
L (cm) 5,237 4,450
W (cm) 1,975 2,128
H (cm) 3,673 2,260
Footprint (m2) 10.3 9.5
Power Density (kVA/m2) 123.3 120.0
Page 35
 3512 vs. X1250
Why Buys

• Lower BMEP:
16.7 vs. 22.3 bar (Prime)
18.6 vs. 24.6 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Higher Ambient Capability: 53 vs. 46oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 4.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system

Page 36
 3512 vs. X1250
Why Buys

• Higher Alter. Output (150oC Rise): 1,405 vs. 1,315 kVA

Durability in harsh environment, better with harmonics
• Better Motor Starting: 3,087 vs. 2,700 skVA
Less on-site power needed/more responsive
• Smaller Footprint: 123.3 vs. 120.0 kVA/m2
Lower construction costs; more revenue space

Page 37
 3512 vs. T1400

3512 T1400
50 hz, PP (kVA) 1,275 1,275
50 hz, SB (kVA) 1,400 1,403
Engine 3512 S12R-PTA
Disp (L) 51.8 49.0
Gross Eng (PP) (bkW) 1,082 1,109
BMEP (Pr) (bar) 16.7 18.1
Gross Eng (SB) (bkW) 1,205 1,220
BMEP (SB) (bar) 18.6 19.9
Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 203.2 208.0
Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 264.6 271.0
Adj Fuel (PP) - 75% (L/hr) 203.2 210.8
Adj Fuel (PP) - 100% (L/hr) 264.6 274.6
Cooling Amb ( oC) 53 50
Backpressure (kPA) 6.7 5.9
Alternator 1445 502L7
Page 38
 3512 vs. T1400
Why Buys
• Lower BMEP:
16.7 vs. 18.1 bar (Prime)
18.6 vs. 19.9 bar (Standby)
Less stress means longer life
• Lower Fuel Consumption:
203.2 vs 208.0 l/hr (75%)
264.6 vs 271.0 l/hr (100%)
Lower Adjusted Fuel Consumption:
203.2 vs 210.8 l/hr (75%)
264.6 vs 274.6 l/hr (100%)
Lower operating costs; greater autonomy
• Higher Ambient Capability: 53 vs. 50oC
Provides full power at site conditions
• Higher Exhaust B/pressure Allowed: 6.7 vs. 5.9 kPA
Lower cost exhaust system

Page 39
 One powerful future.

Questions?

Page 40