Dave Farley - Taking Back “Software Engineering” - Codemotion Amsterdam 2019
0 likes274 views
The document discusses the significance of applying engineering principles to software development, emphasizing an empirical, iterative, and incremental approach to improve efficiency and reduce defects. Key outcomes of adopting an engineering mindset include lower defect rates, faster deployment times, and reduced change-failure rates. The author encourages the software industry to embrace true engineering practices rather than just craftsmanship.
Dave Farley - Taking Back “Software Engineering” - Codemotion Amsterdam 2019
- 1. Dave Farley http://www.davefarley.net @davefarley77 http://www.continuous-delivery.co.uk Taking Back ‘Software Engineering’ Craftsmanship is insufficient
- 2. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 3. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 4. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 5. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 6. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 7. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 8. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Where is the Software Industry? • Craft • Mass Production • Lean Production Techniques
- 9. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Where is the Software Industry? • Craft • Mass Production • Lean Production Techniques
- 10. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Where is the Software Industry? • Craft • Mass Production • Lean Production Techniques We are here!
- 11. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Where is the Software Industry? • Craft • Mass Production • Lean Production Techniques We are here! We should be here!
- 12. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “ Lianping Chen Paddy Power (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217300353)
- 13. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software 90% lower defect rate Source: “ Lianping Chen Paddy Power (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217300353)
- 14. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2014 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 15. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2014 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 8000x faster deployment lead times
- 16. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 17. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 21% Less time spent on unplanned work and rework
- 18. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 19. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 44% More time on new work
- 20. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 21. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 50% lower change-failure rates
- 22. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 23. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2017 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 50% Less time spent fixing security issues
- 24. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2014 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014)
- 25. The Impact of “Engineering” in Software Source: “2014 State of DevOps report”, Jez Humble, Gene Kim, Nicole Forsgren Velasquez, Puppet Labs (2014) 50% Higher Market cap growth over 3 years
- 26. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 27. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 28. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 29. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 30. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 31. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 All Engineering is not the same!
- 32. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 What is ‘Engineering’?
- 33. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 What is ‘Engineering’?
- 34. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 What is ‘Engineering’?
- 35. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 What is ‘Engineering’? Engineering is the application of an empirical, scientific approach to finding efficient solutions to practical problems. (Dave Farley - Just Now!)
- 36. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Fundamentals of an ‘Engineering’ Approach • Iterative • Employs Feedback • Incremental • Experimental • Empirical
- 37. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Iterative Iterative From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia Iteration is the act of repeating a process, either to generate an unbounded sequence of outcomes, or with the aim of approaching a desired goal, target or result.”
- 38. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Means we can learn, react and adapt
- 39. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Means we can learn, react and adapt
- 40. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Means we can learn, react and adapt
- 41. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Means we can learn, react and adapt
- 42. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Allows us to steer towards a goal
- 43. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Allows us to steer towards a goal
- 44. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Fundamental to a process of “Continual Improvement”
- 45. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Fundamental to a process of “Continual Improvement”
- 46. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Allowing us to refine our processes and get better at what we do through practice and repetition
- 47. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Iterative Matters Allowing us to refine our processes and get better at what we do through practice and repetition
- 48. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Feedback Feedback From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia Feedback is information about actions, returned to the source of the actions.
- 49. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Feedback Matters Means we can observe the impact of our choices
- 50. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Feedback Matters Means we can observe the impact of our choices
- 51. Unit Test CodeIdea Executable spec. Build Release Feedback!!!
- 52. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incremental Incremental From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia Evolutionary design, Continuous design, Evolutive design, or "Incremental design" is directly related to any modular design application, in which components can be freely substituted if someone improved can ensure better performance.
- 53. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems
- 54. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems
- 55. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems Earth to Earth orbit
- 56. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems
- 57. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems EarthOrbit to Earth
- 58. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems Earthto M oon, M oontoEarth EarthOrbit to Earth
- 59. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems
- 60. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems Moon toMoon Orbit
- 61. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Incrementalism - Modular Systems Moon Orbit to Moon Moon toMoon Orbit
- 62. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Iterative vs Incremental Source: Jeff Patton
- 63. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Iterative vs Incremental Source: Jeff Patton Iterative
- 64. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Iterative vs Incremental Source: Jeff Patton Iterative Incremental
- 65. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Experimental Experimental From Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia An experiment is a procedure carried out to support, refute, or validate a hypothesis. Experiments provide insight into cause- and-effect by demonstrating what outcome occurs when a particular factor is manipulated.
- 66. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - The Goal
- 67. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - The Goal “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth” - John F. Kennedy (1961)
- 68. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - The Goal
- 69. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - The Challenge
- 70. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - The Challenge
- 71. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 The First “Software Engineer”
- 72. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - Small Steps
- 73. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - Small Steps
- 74. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - Giant Leaps
- 75. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental - Giant Leaps
- 76. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental
- 77. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme
- 78. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure
- 79. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure
- 80. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed!
- 81. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed
- 82. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed ‣ Ranger 5 - Missed!
- 83. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed ‣ Ranger 5 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 6 - Impact, cameras failed
- 84. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed ‣ Ranger 5 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 6 - Impact, cameras failed ‣ Ranger 7 - Success!
- 85. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed ‣ Ranger 5 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 6 - Impact, cameras failed ‣ Ranger 7 - Success! ‣ Ranger 8 - Success!
- 86. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental The Ranger Programme ‣ Ranger 1 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 2 - Launch Failure ‣ Ranger 3 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 4 - Impact, systems failed ‣ Ranger 5 - Missed! ‣ Ranger 6 - Impact, cameras failed ‣ Ranger 7 - Success! ‣ Ranger 8 - Success! ‣ Ranger 9 - Success!
- 87. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental
- 88. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental
- 89. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental
- 90. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Experimental
- 91. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Empirical Empirical From Oxford Dictionaries Based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.
- 92. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Empirical Empirical From Oxford Dictionaries Based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.
- 93. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Empirical Empirical From Oxford Dictionaries Based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.
- 94. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters Means we can be evidence based and data driven
- 95. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters Means we can be evidence based and data driven Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 96. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 97. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 98. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 99. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure • We learn most when reality does NOT match our predictions Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 100. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure • We learn most when reality does NOT match our predictions • Production will ALWAYS surprise us Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 101. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure • We learn most when reality does NOT match our predictions • Production will ALWAYS surprise us • …and it should! Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 102. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure • We learn most when reality does NOT match our predictions • Production will ALWAYS surprise us • …and it should! • All of our design choices, all of our coding efforts all of our tests are only… Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!!
- 103. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Being Empirical Matters • We can never be certain of success • Progress only comes when we risk failure • We learn most when reality does NOT match our predictions • Production will ALWAYS surprise us • …and it should! • All of our design choices, all of our coding efforts all of our tests are only… Stand Back! We are going to try SCIENCE!!! “Our best theory to explain things so far”
- 104. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 • Short Feedback Cycles • Test Driven Development • Automation • Hypothesis Driven • Tests as a Falsification Mechanism Continuous Delivery as an Engineering Discipline
- 105. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 • Short Feedback Cycles • Test Driven Development • Automation • Hypothesis Driven • Tests as a Falsification Mechanism Continuous Delivery as an Engineering Discipline Unit Test CodeIdea Executable spec. Build Release
- 106. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Theory Observation Experiment Prediction
- 107. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017
- 108. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Don’t be “like” Engineers
- 109. (C)opyright Dave Farley 2017 Be Engineers!