Ngn abridged oct2010
   1 byte = 8 bits = 1 character
   1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes
   1 megabyte = 1,000,000 bytes
   1 gigabyte = 1000 mb
   1 terabyte = 1000 gb
   1 petabyte = 1000 tb
   1 exabyte = 1000 petabytes
   1 zetabyte = 1000 exabytes
                        648,000 bytes / .648mb
                            480Page Book




                                                 JPEG Photo @ 1600 x 1200
                                                      375,000 bytes



                                                                            2
Growing by a Factor of 44x
One Zettabyte (ZB) = 1 trillion gigabytes




                 2009
                 0.8 ZB
                                                                  2020 = 35 ZB




 Source: IDC Digital Universe Study, sponsored by EMC, May 2010
   Global IP traffic 2009 to 2014
     15 exabytes per month in 2009
     64 exabytes per month in 2014


   2010: 5 billion internet attached devices
   2020: 22 billion internet attached devices

   Device Affordability and Portability
     iPad: 4 million shipped in August 2010; 87 million iPod
      touch / iPhones in Jul 2010

                 Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s   4
Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device   5
     2004                                         2010
         180mb/s Internet                             1,500 mb/s Internet
         622 mbps Academic bandwidth                  10,000 mb/s Academic bandwidth
         27,370 telephones                            35,127 telephones
         7,757 cell phones                            35,137 cell phones
         187 million emails                            ▪ 3,465 VU Billed
                                                       86,000+ user accounts
                                                       16.7 million authentications per day
                                                       939 million emails


         Average daily Mac address connections grew from 15,000 to 20,477      ( 36%)
         Wireless Access Points grew from 450 to 1,666                         ( 270%)
         Number of Wireless Users grew from 633 to 6,800                       (1,037%)
         Managed Video streaming events grew from 3 (2004) to 172 (2009)       (5,633%)
         Number of IP Telephony terminals grew from 0 to 2,618

    Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device                                                  6
Unit of
         Description           Measure     2008*   Current % Change   Duration
Possible Attack Events          Millions       9        95   972%      Yearly
Security Events                  units       949    21,093 2,123%      Yearly
E-Discovery Events               units        57       121   112%      Yearly
External Complaints              units      NA       3,089             Yearly
BOTs Active                      units      NA         224             Daily
BOTS Total Detected              units      NA       3,114             Yearly
Google Traffic                 Gigabytes    NA      10,205            Monthly
Facebook Traffic               Gigabytes    NA         201            Monthly
Twitter Traffic                Gigabytes    NA          61            Monthly
Hotmail Traffic                Gigabytes    NA          28            Monthly
MySpace Traffic                Gigabytes    NA           4            Monthly
LinkedIn Traffic               Gigabytes    NA           3            Monthly
e-Harmony Traffic              Gigabytes    NA           1            Monthly

Note: -
 NA - Not available
 * - Earliest data from 2008
Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s   8
Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device   9
Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device   10
Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device   11
Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device   12
Voice           Data


                                                             NGN Unified
                                                             Collaboration


                                                         Video       Collaboration



 Rich, converged collaboration through the unification of voice, video, web, and
  collaboration tools
 Enhanced security, low latency, appropriate capacity
 Getting the right person, to the right resource, any where, anytime, on any device.


                                                                                        13
14
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu   15
    Distributed knowledge communities that
       collaborate and communicate across
       disciplines, distances and culture

      High Performance Computing
      Data, Data Analysis, and Visualization
      Virtual Organizations for Distributed
       Communities
      Learning and Workforce Development
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu                        16
    Science is bigger
       Scientific instruments
          collect more information at faster rates
          reside in different localities


       Experts do not reside in one geography
       Institutions house various experts in various
        fields
       Dispersed world-wide expertise
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu                                17
 Multiple disciplines
   Many funding agencies
   Many institutions
   Many investigators
   Expensive, remote instruments
   Mass data generation
   Outside the realm of human
    cognition
   Computation and visualization aid
    understanding



matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu                18
   Dr. David Piston - Proteomics
                                                                 12 bit depth (which means 16 bit
                                                                  storage for each) at 512 x 512
                                                                  pixels and 120 frames per
                                                                  second.
                                                                 This turns out to be almost
                                                                  exactly 1 Gbit/sec.
                                                                 They are offering an increased
                                                                  number of channels which would
                                                                  be very useful for us, and that
                                                                  would give 4 to 16 times higher
                                                                  data rates.
                                                                 Of course, that isn’t currently
                        Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope
                                                                  practical for most things even if
                                                                  we had unlimited band width and
                                                                  storage, because we don’t have
• Scan resolution Up to 1536x1536 pixels, also                    the analysis tools to handle that
  for several channels, continuously variable                     kind of data stream yet either!
• Scanning speed Variable up to 120 frames/s
  with 512x512 pixels                                            “In May [2009], my lab has
• Data depth Selectable: 8 bits or 12 bits                        already taken 7.2 TBytes of data
                                                                  on that system. . .”                19
 matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu   20
    Brandeis University (1985)                                          University of California, Santa Barbara (1995)
      Brown University (1933)                                             The University of Chicago (1900)
      California Institute of Technology (1934)                           University of Colorado at Boulder (1966)
      Carnegie Mellon University (1982)                                   University of Florida (1985)
      Case Western Reserve University (1969)                              University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1908)
      Columbia University (1900)                                          The University of Iowa (1909)
      Cornell University (1900)                                           The University of Kansas (1909)
      Duke University (1938)                                              University of Maryland, College Park (1969)
      Emory University (1995)                                             University of Michigan (1900)
      Harvard University (1900)                                           University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1908)
      Indiana University (1909)                                           University of Missouri-Columbia (1908)
      Iowa State University (1958)                                        University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1909)
      The Johns Hopkins University (1900)                                 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922)
      Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1934)                        University of Oregon (1969)
      McGill University (1926)                                            University of Pennsylvania (1900)
      Michigan State University (1964)                                    University of Pittsburgh (1974)
      New York University (1950)                                          University of Rochester (1941)
      Northwestern University (1917)                                      University of Southern California (1969)
      The Ohio State University (1916)                                    The University of Texas at Austin (1929)
      The Pennsylvania State University (1958)                            University of Toronto (1926)
      Princeton University (1900)                                         University of Virginia (1904)
      Purdue University (1958)                                            University of Washington (1950)
      Rice University (1985)                                              The University of Wisconsin-Madison (1900)
      Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989)                  Vanderbilt University (1950)
      Stanford University (1900)                                          Washington University in St. Louis (1923)
      Stony Brook University-State University of New York (2001)          Yale University (1900)
      Syracuse University (1966)
      Texas A&M University (2001)
      Tulane University (1958)
      The University of Arizona (1985)
      University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (1989)
      University of California, Berkeley (1900)
      University of California, Davis (1996)
      University of California, Irvine (1996)
      University of California, Los Angeles (1974)
      University of California, San Diego (1982)



matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu                                                                                                             21
    NIH provides leadership and financial support
       to researchers in every state and throughout
       the world
        over 325,000   extramural scientists
         and research personnel
        at more than 3,000 institutions
            nationwide.

matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu                               22
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu   23
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu   24
    Capture
        Lecture
        Events
        Locations
        Surveillance


      Dissemination
        Uploads content

matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu   25
    Netflix / Youtube
      Televisions go Digital
      Computers go TV!
      Social and Chat
      Gaming




matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu        26
Solution:
10G upgrade, VRF
 implementation,
    and moving
   Control Point




                   27
28
Right Person, Right Place, Right Time, Right Role

           Common Access Point




                                                    29

More Related Content

PDF
Pogoce design concept low
PDF
Examples of use
PPSX
How Vir2 Can Help Charity Mobile Strategy
PDF
The Creativity Machine
 
PDF
Solomo slides
DOCX
Propose
DOC
2010 planning
PPT
Inventor centre presentation
Pogoce design concept low
Examples of use
How Vir2 Can Help Charity Mobile Strategy
The Creativity Machine
 
Solomo slides
Propose
2010 planning
Inventor centre presentation

Similar to Ngn abridged oct2010 (20)

PPTX
Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010
PDF
Connecting, Sharing, Growing
PPTX
Big Data and Analytics - Why Should We Care?
PPTX
Multi-network Solutions in the Real World: NAB 2012, Will Law, Akamai
PDF
Cloud 2015: The Road to 15 Billion Connected Devices
PPTX
국제E비즈니스학회강장묵 차세대소셜서비스개발(20090619)
PDF
The Next Five Years
PDF
Endpoints stki summit 2012-shahar geiger maor
PDF
Wireless Access Systems Shared Blog
PPT
Set My Data Free: High-Performance CI for Data-Intensive Research
PPT
Ibm swg day 2012 jhb big data (white)
PPT
PPTX
The Net Effect: It's Not What We Make, It's What We Make Possible
PPTX
Beyond the Internet: Seamless Global Communication
PPTX
The Missing Link: Dedicated End-to-End 10Gbps Optical Lightpaths for Clusters...
PDF
Building the Future with Technology: The Next Five Years
PDF
Roadshow Ericsson 2010 : introduction d'Olivier Cimelière
PDF
1109 siit jfriedrich v02
PDF
Complete inet-phi-book-vol-1-2003-secure
PDF
IBM-Why Big Data?
Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010
Connecting, Sharing, Growing
Big Data and Analytics - Why Should We Care?
Multi-network Solutions in the Real World: NAB 2012, Will Law, Akamai
Cloud 2015: The Road to 15 Billion Connected Devices
국제E비즈니스학회강장묵 차세대소셜서비스개발(20090619)
The Next Five Years
Endpoints stki summit 2012-shahar geiger maor
Wireless Access Systems Shared Blog
Set My Data Free: High-Performance CI for Data-Intensive Research
Ibm swg day 2012 jhb big data (white)
The Net Effect: It's Not What We Make, It's What We Make Possible
Beyond the Internet: Seamless Global Communication
The Missing Link: Dedicated End-to-End 10Gbps Optical Lightpaths for Clusters...
Building the Future with Technology: The Next Five Years
Roadshow Ericsson 2010 : introduction d'Olivier Cimelière
1109 siit jfriedrich v02
Complete inet-phi-book-vol-1-2003-secure
IBM-Why Big Data?

Ngn abridged oct2010

  • 2. 1 byte = 8 bits = 1 character  1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes  1 megabyte = 1,000,000 bytes  1 gigabyte = 1000 mb  1 terabyte = 1000 gb  1 petabyte = 1000 tb  1 exabyte = 1000 petabytes  1 zetabyte = 1000 exabytes 648,000 bytes / .648mb 480Page Book JPEG Photo @ 1600 x 1200 375,000 bytes 2
  • 3. Growing by a Factor of 44x One Zettabyte (ZB) = 1 trillion gigabytes 2009 0.8 ZB 2020 = 35 ZB Source: IDC Digital Universe Study, sponsored by EMC, May 2010
  • 4. Global IP traffic 2009 to 2014  15 exabytes per month in 2009  64 exabytes per month in 2014  2010: 5 billion internet attached devices  2020: 22 billion internet attached devices  Device Affordability and Portability  iPad: 4 million shipped in August 2010; 87 million iPod touch / iPhones in Jul 2010 Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 4
  • 5. Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 5
  • 6. 2004  2010  180mb/s Internet  1,500 mb/s Internet  622 mbps Academic bandwidth  10,000 mb/s Academic bandwidth  27,370 telephones  35,127 telephones  7,757 cell phones  35,137 cell phones  187 million emails ▪ 3,465 VU Billed  86,000+ user accounts  16.7 million authentications per day  939 million emails  Average daily Mac address connections grew from 15,000 to 20,477 ( 36%)  Wireless Access Points grew from 450 to 1,666 ( 270%)  Number of Wireless Users grew from 633 to 6,800 (1,037%)  Managed Video streaming events grew from 3 (2004) to 172 (2009) (5,633%)  Number of IP Telephony terminals grew from 0 to 2,618 Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 6
  • 7. Unit of Description Measure 2008* Current % Change Duration Possible Attack Events Millions 9 95 972% Yearly Security Events units 949 21,093 2,123% Yearly E-Discovery Events units 57 121 112% Yearly External Complaints units NA 3,089 Yearly BOTs Active units NA 224 Daily BOTS Total Detected units NA 3,114 Yearly Google Traffic Gigabytes NA 10,205 Monthly Facebook Traffic Gigabytes NA 201 Monthly Twitter Traffic Gigabytes NA 61 Monthly Hotmail Traffic Gigabytes NA 28 Monthly MySpace Traffic Gigabytes NA 4 Monthly LinkedIn Traffic Gigabytes NA 3 Monthly e-Harmony Traffic Gigabytes NA 1 Monthly Note: - NA - Not available * - Earliest data from 2008
  • 8. Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 8
  • 9. Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 9
  • 10. Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 10
  • 11. Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 11
  • 12. Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 12
  • 13. Voice Data NGN Unified Collaboration Video Collaboration  Rich, converged collaboration through the unification of voice, video, web, and collaboration tools  Enhanced security, low latency, appropriate capacity  Getting the right person, to the right resource, any where, anytime, on any device. 13
  • 14. 14
  • 16. Distributed knowledge communities that collaborate and communicate across disciplines, distances and culture  High Performance Computing  Data, Data Analysis, and Visualization  Virtual Organizations for Distributed Communities  Learning and Workforce Development [email protected] 16
  • 17. Science is bigger  Scientific instruments  collect more information at faster rates  reside in different localities  Experts do not reside in one geography  Institutions house various experts in various fields  Dispersed world-wide expertise [email protected] 17
  • 18.  Multiple disciplines  Many funding agencies  Many institutions  Many investigators  Expensive, remote instruments  Mass data generation  Outside the realm of human cognition  Computation and visualization aid understanding [email protected] 18
  • 19. Dr. David Piston - Proteomics  12 bit depth (which means 16 bit storage for each) at 512 x 512 pixels and 120 frames per second.  This turns out to be almost exactly 1 Gbit/sec.  They are offering an increased number of channels which would be very useful for us, and that would give 4 to 16 times higher data rates.  Of course, that isn’t currently Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope practical for most things even if we had unlimited band width and storage, because we don’t have • Scan resolution Up to 1536x1536 pixels, also the analysis tools to handle that for several channels, continuously variable kind of data stream yet either! • Scanning speed Variable up to 120 frames/s with 512x512 pixels  “In May [2009], my lab has • Data depth Selectable: 8 bits or 12 bits already taken 7.2 TBytes of data on that system. . .” 19 [email protected]
  • 21. Brandeis University (1985)  University of California, Santa Barbara (1995)  Brown University (1933)  The University of Chicago (1900)  California Institute of Technology (1934)  University of Colorado at Boulder (1966)  Carnegie Mellon University (1982)  University of Florida (1985)  Case Western Reserve University (1969)  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1908)  Columbia University (1900)  The University of Iowa (1909)  Cornell University (1900)  The University of Kansas (1909)  Duke University (1938)  University of Maryland, College Park (1969)  Emory University (1995)  University of Michigan (1900)  Harvard University (1900)  University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1908)  Indiana University (1909)  University of Missouri-Columbia (1908)  Iowa State University (1958)  University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1909)  The Johns Hopkins University (1900)  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922)  Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1934)  University of Oregon (1969)  McGill University (1926)  University of Pennsylvania (1900)  Michigan State University (1964)  University of Pittsburgh (1974)  New York University (1950)  University of Rochester (1941)  Northwestern University (1917)  University of Southern California (1969)  The Ohio State University (1916)  The University of Texas at Austin (1929)  The Pennsylvania State University (1958)  University of Toronto (1926)  Princeton University (1900)  University of Virginia (1904)  Purdue University (1958)  University of Washington (1950)  Rice University (1985)  The University of Wisconsin-Madison (1900)  Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989)  Vanderbilt University (1950)  Stanford University (1900)  Washington University in St. Louis (1923)  Stony Brook University-State University of New York (2001)  Yale University (1900)  Syracuse University (1966)  Texas A&M University (2001)  Tulane University (1958)  The University of Arizona (1985)  University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (1989)  University of California, Berkeley (1900)  University of California, Davis (1996)  University of California, Irvine (1996)  University of California, Los Angeles (1974)  University of California, San Diego (1982) [email protected] 21
  • 22. NIH provides leadership and financial support to researchers in every state and throughout the world  over 325,000 extramural scientists and research personnel  at more than 3,000 institutions nationwide. [email protected] 22
  • 25. Capture  Lecture  Events  Locations  Surveillance  Dissemination  Uploads content [email protected] 25
  • 26. Netflix / Youtube  Televisions go Digital  Computers go TV!  Social and Chat  Gaming [email protected] 26
  • 27. Solution: 10G upgrade, VRF implementation, and moving Control Point 27
  • 28. 28
  • 29. Right Person, Right Place, Right Time, Right Role Common Access Point 29