ICGFM Winter Conference: Performance. Results. Outcomes.  Understanding Impact in Managing Public Finance ‘ Managing for Results’ (MfR) in ‘ Public Financial Management’ (PFM) .  December  2-4, 2009, Washington D.C. .  Jean-Baptiste Sawadogo President Leader One Inc Tel. +1 613 721 8087;  E-mail:  [email_address]   © 2009 Leader One Inc.
‘ Managing for Results’ in ‘Public Financial Management’ New ‘experiment’ in Public Sector Policy and Management Very limited studies, literature and evidence Provide a bird’s view perspective Improve understanding of MfR Share observation and reflections on the topic Stimulate debate on MfR and its potentials for PFM and good governance © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR and its Impact in PFM MfR: results first; then resources, then … PFM : money first; then processes; then results?? MfR: impact mostly on developed country agencies MfR can potentially impact developing country PFM MfR to likely suffer from the ‘pendulum effect’ The impact of PFM: the improved  wellbeing  and  prosperity  of  citizens: girls, boys, women, men © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Managing for Results (MfR) is a Strategic Quest for Results MfR practiced for millenniums Strong military influence ‘ Managing for Results ’  - the precursor term for  ‘ Strategic Management ’ MfR: envisioning results, aligning resources and taking action to achieve results The private sector uses MfR to create  wealth ; The public sector can use MfR to deliver  results  to citizens © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Global MfR Drivers & Milestones Finance is finite  AND  “Do more with less!” - early 1990s recession Finance is not everything  CIDA’s Strategic Review and Renewal Exercise (1990+) The ‘Government Performance and Results Act’ is enacted in the U.S. (1993) Results-Based Management (RBM) at CIDA (1993+) Office of the Auditor General of Canada Report (1993+1995) Aid Effectiveness Principles adopted by DAC-OECD (1996) Assessing Aid: a World Bank report (1998) Results for Canadians - a Government-wide RBM Policy (2000) Many OEDC countries have adopted a results-focus (+ - 2000) The Millennium Declaration on the MDGs at the UN (2000) ‘ Managing for Development Results’ – WB and OECD (2002) Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness DAC-OECD-led process (2005+) Global consensus on the need for a results focused approach  © 2009 Leader One Inc.
A New Global Imperative: ‘Managing for Results’ Demands on governments and their agencies to deliver results and be accountable Demands on international organizations to “focus on results” Demands on private firms to perform: financially and socially Requirement for innovative results oriented  management approaches Increasing demand for Results-Focused PFM © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Performance Review Led to MfR in the Public Sector Performance review : spotlight on “Spending” vs. “Results” ‘ Performance Audit’: ‘Value for Re$ources’ (VfR) in external audit ‘ Managing for Results’ is now fuelling ‘Performance Audit’ and ‘Performance Budgeting’ Leadership of ‘Public Finance’ functions is needed © 2009 Leader One Inc.
The Role of Monitoring and  Evaluation (M&E) Towards MfR M&E: precursor practices towards MfR Monitoring during project and program implementation Evaluation during and after implementation M&E functions were first to promote MfR   © 2009 Leader One Inc.
The Role of ‘Performance Audit’ Comprehensive Audit: an early form of Performance Audit Performance Audit is: “…  a systematic, purposeful, organized and objective examination of government activities; … designed to promote accountable government; … includes the examination of economy, efficiency, cost effectiveness and environmental effects of government activities ...” “ A focus on performance covers both the benefits accomplished [for citizens] and due process and fairness in the delivery of services”(1) Performance Audit calls for performance  (1)  Excerpts adapted from the Performance Audit Manual, Office of the Auditor General of Canada - June 2004; pages 13 and 17) © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Growing Impact of Supreme Audit Institutions On PFM Performance Improving SAIs capacity in  Performance Audit Improving profile and independence Increasing innovative audit standards & specialties Increasing interaction with parliaments, civil society, the media and citizens Increasing transparency, improved anti-corruption, and increasing accountability Ultimately, improving PFM performance - results for citizens © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Performance Budgeting - A First Step Towards MfR in PFM Performance budgeting = Results-Based Budgeting Emerged within a decade or so Conveys government commitment to performance A Public Expenditures Management flavor Consists in  ‘ informing ’  the  ‘ Budget ’  with  ‘ Results ’ Falls short of being truly  ‘ results-focused ’ First step towards MfR in PFM for greater Public Sector performance © 2009 Leader One Inc.
What is ‘Managing for Results’? A deliberate, systematic, rigorous pursuit of results A way of thinking; of doing business Linking of ‘ Re$ources ’ with ‘ Results ’ committed to Two “brands” of results-focused Management Original: ‘Results-Based Management’ (‘RBM’) 1  -  Inputs   vs .  Results  (outputs, outcomes, and impacts) Consensus: ‘Managing for Development Results’ (‘MfDR’) 2  1 Original “brand”: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA); 1993+ 2 Subsequent consensus “brand”: DAC-OECD-led consultative process 2002+ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
‘ Managing for Results’:  A Nine-Point Overview ‘ Misconceptions’ Principles Precise vocabulary Logical hierarchy of results Tools Crosscutting Issues Performance Management Functional Stakeholders ‘ Rewards’ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
1. Top ‘Misconceptions’ ‘ Managing for Results’ is ‘Monitoring & Evaluation’ Attribution of ‘Results’ is impossible; so, MfR does not work The ‘impact’? Don’t bother during project or program implementation.  © 2009 Leader One Inc.
2. Top Principles Partnership/Participation Transparency Broad application © 2009 Leader One Inc.
3. Precise Vocabulary ‘ Reach’ : the human element of MfR ‘ Result ’: an expected or actual  achievement   ‘ Indicator ’: ONLY a  measure  of progress or achievement ‘ Target’ : desired level for an indicator  ‘ Activity ’: NOT a ‘Result’;  IS  the ‘ doing ’, the action to achieve a result © 2009 Leader One Inc.
4. Logical hierarchy of results Impact Outcomes … Outputs … N.B.: Activities are not results © 2009 Leader One Inc.
5. Top Tools The Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) or Logic Model (LM) The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) The Implementation Plan - the business plan integrates all the parts of MfR © 2009 Leader One Inc.
6. Top Crosscutting Issues Gender Equality Mainstreaming : responsiveness to specific issues of girls, boys, women and men Sustainable Environment Mainstreaming: regulatory compliance and proactive developmental sustainability Knowledge Management & Sharing; echoes a 4 th  RBM principle: ‘Learning by Doing’ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
7. Performance Management Performance Management is a subset of MfR Expected results planned ahead Indicators selected and  baseline  data collected Performance management framework Implementation: activities; budgets; processes; reports; risk mgt., work plans; etc. Continuous monitoring and analysis of results, activities, risks, lessons learned Continuous improvement towards results © 2009 Leader One Inc.
8. Top Functional Stakeholders Managerial functions - corporate and line Performance management/review functions (Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation, MfR) Financial functions (Budgeting, Accounting; Control; Procurement; Internal Audit) Necessity for functional coordinated contribution towards to results; while managing risk © 2009 Leader One Inc.
9. Top ‘Rewards’ of MfR Results for citizens - girls, boys, women and men Strong focus: elimination of wasteful ‘activities’ ‘ Guaranteed’ ‘Value for Re$ources’: right results at right efficiency Capacity to demonstrate relevance and communicate performance - ‘Results’ vs. ‘Re$ources’ ‘ Rewards’: recognition; more funding; winning competitive funding © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM - Where Are We? Application of MfR in PFM Developing country experiences Developed country experiences Selected country experiences Key challenges of MfR in PFM © 2009 Leader One Inc.
Application of MfR in PFM Public Expenditures Management mentality Supremacy of the budget process Performance/Results-Based Budgeting mostly Some ‘Results for citizens’ reform: deliberate whole-of-government approach; but… Strong agency/sector/functional orientation rather than true ‘Results for Citizens’ focus © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: Developing Countries MfR is a by-product of development aid: Applied to aid projects; then programs Application in ‘Program-based approaches’; progressively in PRSPs Focus on Public Expenditures Management and anticorruption Emerging whole-of-government  approaches © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: Developed Countries MfR is a by-product of austerity and crisis management Agency/departmental performance management Whole-of-government approaches  Improvement of regulatory and policy frameworks Implementation through the budget process The pendulum effect after every crisis hardening vs. easing of rules Dilemma of stimulus packages: quick results vs. fear of risks © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM - Selected Experiences Canada  China France Sweden United States of America  © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: Key Challenges ‘ Expenditure’ mentality; supremacy of the ‘Budget’ Risk-averse culture: across-the-board measures Complexity in government/self preserving structures Divided governance: Political; Legislative; Public Service; Judiciary; Decentralized regimes… Short-to-medium term electoral cycle vision Increased discourse but still confusion and insufficient practice  Difficulty in moving beyond activities and outputs © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: Where Are We Going? MfR is increasing in awareness and appeal Performance budgeting is increasing in popularity Citizens will keep pushing for results Do we have a choice to practice MfR or not? Yes - BUT…  We must master the art and the science for MfR in PFM  © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: How to Get There? Strong MfR leadership at the top Long term orderly MfR implementation (culture change takes time) Long-term results-focused country vision Comprehensive country results framework Results-focused country strategic documents Results-friendly risk-mitigation practices © 2009 Leader One Inc.
MfR in PFM: A Final Word ‘ Managing for Results’ is here to stay - citizens will keep pushing for results  Private sector uses MfR; creates enormous wealth Private sector flexibility: the budget is a tool Public sector rigidity: the budget is the law! The Public Sector can and must master MfR to deliver sustainable  wellbeing  and  prosperity  - for citizens: girls, boys, women and men… If Public Finance professionals catch up with MfR and lead for performance; results; outcome; impact To your results-focused leadership! © 2009 Leader One Inc.
For Additional Information: OECD-World Bank: Managing for Development Results:  www.mfdr.org   Canadian International Development Agency: RBM info:  http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/acdi-cida/ACDI-CIDA.nsf/eng/NAT-92213444-N2H#intro Office of the Auditor General of Canada; Performance Audit Methodology:  http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/oag-bvg_e_859.html   Leader One Inc: e-mail to:  [email_address]   © 2009 Leader One Inc.

3.30 4.15pm Managing For Results In Pfm (Jean Baptiste Sawadogo)

  • 1.
    ICGFM Winter Conference:Performance. Results. Outcomes. Understanding Impact in Managing Public Finance ‘ Managing for Results’ (MfR) in ‘ Public Financial Management’ (PFM) . December 2-4, 2009, Washington D.C. . Jean-Baptiste Sawadogo President Leader One Inc Tel. +1 613 721 8087; E-mail: [email_address] © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 2.
    ‘ Managing forResults’ in ‘Public Financial Management’ New ‘experiment’ in Public Sector Policy and Management Very limited studies, literature and evidence Provide a bird’s view perspective Improve understanding of MfR Share observation and reflections on the topic Stimulate debate on MfR and its potentials for PFM and good governance © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 3.
    MfR and itsImpact in PFM MfR: results first; then resources, then … PFM : money first; then processes; then results?? MfR: impact mostly on developed country agencies MfR can potentially impact developing country PFM MfR to likely suffer from the ‘pendulum effect’ The impact of PFM: the improved wellbeing and prosperity of citizens: girls, boys, women, men © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 4.
    Managing for Results(MfR) is a Strategic Quest for Results MfR practiced for millenniums Strong military influence ‘ Managing for Results ’ - the precursor term for ‘ Strategic Management ’ MfR: envisioning results, aligning resources and taking action to achieve results The private sector uses MfR to create wealth ; The public sector can use MfR to deliver results to citizens © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 5.
    Global MfR Drivers& Milestones Finance is finite AND “Do more with less!” - early 1990s recession Finance is not everything CIDA’s Strategic Review and Renewal Exercise (1990+) The ‘Government Performance and Results Act’ is enacted in the U.S. (1993) Results-Based Management (RBM) at CIDA (1993+) Office of the Auditor General of Canada Report (1993+1995) Aid Effectiveness Principles adopted by DAC-OECD (1996) Assessing Aid: a World Bank report (1998) Results for Canadians - a Government-wide RBM Policy (2000) Many OEDC countries have adopted a results-focus (+ - 2000) The Millennium Declaration on the MDGs at the UN (2000) ‘ Managing for Development Results’ – WB and OECD (2002) Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness DAC-OECD-led process (2005+) Global consensus on the need for a results focused approach © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 6.
    A New GlobalImperative: ‘Managing for Results’ Demands on governments and their agencies to deliver results and be accountable Demands on international organizations to “focus on results” Demands on private firms to perform: financially and socially Requirement for innovative results oriented management approaches Increasing demand for Results-Focused PFM © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 7.
    Performance Review Ledto MfR in the Public Sector Performance review : spotlight on “Spending” vs. “Results” ‘ Performance Audit’: ‘Value for Re$ources’ (VfR) in external audit ‘ Managing for Results’ is now fuelling ‘Performance Audit’ and ‘Performance Budgeting’ Leadership of ‘Public Finance’ functions is needed © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 8.
    The Role ofMonitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Towards MfR M&E: precursor practices towards MfR Monitoring during project and program implementation Evaluation during and after implementation M&E functions were first to promote MfR © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 9.
    The Role of‘Performance Audit’ Comprehensive Audit: an early form of Performance Audit Performance Audit is: “… a systematic, purposeful, organized and objective examination of government activities; … designed to promote accountable government; … includes the examination of economy, efficiency, cost effectiveness and environmental effects of government activities ...” “ A focus on performance covers both the benefits accomplished [for citizens] and due process and fairness in the delivery of services”(1) Performance Audit calls for performance (1) Excerpts adapted from the Performance Audit Manual, Office of the Auditor General of Canada - June 2004; pages 13 and 17) © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 10.
    Growing Impact ofSupreme Audit Institutions On PFM Performance Improving SAIs capacity in Performance Audit Improving profile and independence Increasing innovative audit standards & specialties Increasing interaction with parliaments, civil society, the media and citizens Increasing transparency, improved anti-corruption, and increasing accountability Ultimately, improving PFM performance - results for citizens © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 11.
    Performance Budgeting -A First Step Towards MfR in PFM Performance budgeting = Results-Based Budgeting Emerged within a decade or so Conveys government commitment to performance A Public Expenditures Management flavor Consists in ‘ informing ’ the ‘ Budget ’ with ‘ Results ’ Falls short of being truly ‘ results-focused ’ First step towards MfR in PFM for greater Public Sector performance © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 12.
    What is ‘Managingfor Results’? A deliberate, systematic, rigorous pursuit of results A way of thinking; of doing business Linking of ‘ Re$ources ’ with ‘ Results ’ committed to Two “brands” of results-focused Management Original: ‘Results-Based Management’ (‘RBM’) 1 - Inputs vs . Results (outputs, outcomes, and impacts) Consensus: ‘Managing for Development Results’ (‘MfDR’) 2 1 Original “brand”: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA); 1993+ 2 Subsequent consensus “brand”: DAC-OECD-led consultative process 2002+ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 13.
    ‘ Managing forResults’: A Nine-Point Overview ‘ Misconceptions’ Principles Precise vocabulary Logical hierarchy of results Tools Crosscutting Issues Performance Management Functional Stakeholders ‘ Rewards’ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 14.
    1. Top ‘Misconceptions’‘ Managing for Results’ is ‘Monitoring & Evaluation’ Attribution of ‘Results’ is impossible; so, MfR does not work The ‘impact’? Don’t bother during project or program implementation. © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 15.
    2. Top PrinciplesPartnership/Participation Transparency Broad application © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 16.
    3. Precise Vocabulary‘ Reach’ : the human element of MfR ‘ Result ’: an expected or actual achievement ‘ Indicator ’: ONLY a measure of progress or achievement ‘ Target’ : desired level for an indicator ‘ Activity ’: NOT a ‘Result’; IS the ‘ doing ’, the action to achieve a result © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 17.
    4. Logical hierarchyof results Impact Outcomes … Outputs … N.B.: Activities are not results © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 18.
    5. Top ToolsThe Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) or Logic Model (LM) The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) The Implementation Plan - the business plan integrates all the parts of MfR © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 19.
    6. Top CrosscuttingIssues Gender Equality Mainstreaming : responsiveness to specific issues of girls, boys, women and men Sustainable Environment Mainstreaming: regulatory compliance and proactive developmental sustainability Knowledge Management & Sharing; echoes a 4 th RBM principle: ‘Learning by Doing’ © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 20.
    7. Performance ManagementPerformance Management is a subset of MfR Expected results planned ahead Indicators selected and baseline data collected Performance management framework Implementation: activities; budgets; processes; reports; risk mgt., work plans; etc. Continuous monitoring and analysis of results, activities, risks, lessons learned Continuous improvement towards results © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 21.
    8. Top FunctionalStakeholders Managerial functions - corporate and line Performance management/review functions (Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation, MfR) Financial functions (Budgeting, Accounting; Control; Procurement; Internal Audit) Necessity for functional coordinated contribution towards to results; while managing risk © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 22.
    9. Top ‘Rewards’of MfR Results for citizens - girls, boys, women and men Strong focus: elimination of wasteful ‘activities’ ‘ Guaranteed’ ‘Value for Re$ources’: right results at right efficiency Capacity to demonstrate relevance and communicate performance - ‘Results’ vs. ‘Re$ources’ ‘ Rewards’: recognition; more funding; winning competitive funding © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 23.
    MfR in PFM- Where Are We? Application of MfR in PFM Developing country experiences Developed country experiences Selected country experiences Key challenges of MfR in PFM © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 24.
    Application of MfRin PFM Public Expenditures Management mentality Supremacy of the budget process Performance/Results-Based Budgeting mostly Some ‘Results for citizens’ reform: deliberate whole-of-government approach; but… Strong agency/sector/functional orientation rather than true ‘Results for Citizens’ focus © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 25.
    MfR in PFM:Developing Countries MfR is a by-product of development aid: Applied to aid projects; then programs Application in ‘Program-based approaches’; progressively in PRSPs Focus on Public Expenditures Management and anticorruption Emerging whole-of-government approaches © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 26.
    MfR in PFM:Developed Countries MfR is a by-product of austerity and crisis management Agency/departmental performance management Whole-of-government approaches Improvement of regulatory and policy frameworks Implementation through the budget process The pendulum effect after every crisis hardening vs. easing of rules Dilemma of stimulus packages: quick results vs. fear of risks © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 27.
    MfR in PFM- Selected Experiences Canada China France Sweden United States of America © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 28.
    MfR in PFM:Key Challenges ‘ Expenditure’ mentality; supremacy of the ‘Budget’ Risk-averse culture: across-the-board measures Complexity in government/self preserving structures Divided governance: Political; Legislative; Public Service; Judiciary; Decentralized regimes… Short-to-medium term electoral cycle vision Increased discourse but still confusion and insufficient practice Difficulty in moving beyond activities and outputs © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 29.
    MfR in PFM:Where Are We Going? MfR is increasing in awareness and appeal Performance budgeting is increasing in popularity Citizens will keep pushing for results Do we have a choice to practice MfR or not? Yes - BUT… We must master the art and the science for MfR in PFM © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 30.
    MfR in PFM:How to Get There? Strong MfR leadership at the top Long term orderly MfR implementation (culture change takes time) Long-term results-focused country vision Comprehensive country results framework Results-focused country strategic documents Results-friendly risk-mitigation practices © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 31.
    MfR in PFM:A Final Word ‘ Managing for Results’ is here to stay - citizens will keep pushing for results Private sector uses MfR; creates enormous wealth Private sector flexibility: the budget is a tool Public sector rigidity: the budget is the law! The Public Sector can and must master MfR to deliver sustainable wellbeing and prosperity - for citizens: girls, boys, women and men… If Public Finance professionals catch up with MfR and lead for performance; results; outcome; impact To your results-focused leadership! © 2009 Leader One Inc.
  • 32.
    For Additional Information:OECD-World Bank: Managing for Development Results: www.mfdr.org Canadian International Development Agency: RBM info: http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/acdi-cida/ACDI-CIDA.nsf/eng/NAT-92213444-N2H#intro Office of the Auditor General of Canada; Performance Audit Methodology: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/oag-bvg_e_859.html Leader One Inc: e-mail to: [email_address] © 2009 Leader One Inc.

Editor's Notes