The document discusses banking sector reforms in India prior to 1991. It notes that prior to reforms, the banking sector was characterized by administered interest rates, quantitative restrictions on lending, high reserve requirements, and stringent regulations. The first Narasimham Committee was set up in 1991 to recommend measures to strengthen the banking system. The first phase of reforms included reducing statutory liquidity and cash reserve ratios, deregulating interest rates, setting up debt recovery tribunals, and introducing prudential norms on income recognition and asset classification. Non-performing assets were identified as a key issue, with guidelines provided on classifying assets as standard, sub-standard, doubtful or loss.
Pre-Reform Era
Prior toreforms, the Indian banking Sector was
characterised by:
Administered interest rate structure
Quantitative restrictions on credit flows
High Reserve Requirements
Imposition of stringent regulations by RBI
Low productivity / efficiency in PSU banks
Deteriorating portfolio quality/ increasing NPAs
3.
Pre-Reform Era
7. Inferiorwork technology
8. Poor quality of customer service
9. Inability to face competition
It was in the above circumstances that
the first Narasimham Committee was
set up.
4.
Narasimham Committee
The firstNarasimham Committee was set up
in 1991 to suggest remedial measures for
strengthening the banking system
encompassing:
1. Banking Policy
2. Institutional Structure
3. Supervisory System
4. Legislative and technological changes
5.
Thrust of reforms
Themain thrust of economic reforms was on:
1. Removal of structural bottlenecks
2. Introduction of new players and instruments
3. Introduction of free pricing of financial assets
4. Relaxation of quantitative restrictions
5. Improvement in trading, clearing and
settlement practices
6. Promotion of institutional infrastructure
7. Ensuring of technological upgradation.
6.
First Phase ofBanking Sector Reforms
included the following:
1. Reduction in SLR and CRR to 25% and 10%
respectively
2. De-regulation of interest rates on deposits and
advances
3. Transparent guidelines for private sector
reforms
4. Modification of bank balance sheet and P&L a/c
to disclose more information
7.
First Phase ofBanking Sector Reforms
included the following:
5 Direct access to capital markets for PSU banks
6 Liberalised branch licensing policy and more
licenses for private sector banks
7 Setting up of Debt Recovery Tribunals to ensure
quick recovery of debts
8 Prudential norms for income recognition, asset
classification and provisioning of bad debts
9 Capital adequacy norms –BIS norms on capital
adequacy to be followed.
8.
Non Performing Assets(NPA)
The Narasimham Committee (1991) identified NPAs
as one of the possible causes / effects of the
malfunctioning of PSU banks.
NPAs are those categories of assets (advances ,
bills disc, cash credit, etc) which cease to generate
income for the bank.
9.
Basis of treatingan asset
(credit facility) as NPA
1. Where the interest and installments remain
overdue for a period exceeding 90 days
2. Any bill which remain overdue for a period of 90
days
3. Any amount due on any other loan which
remain overdue for a period exceeding 90 days
4. Any Cash Credit / overdraft facility which
remains out of order for a period exceeding 90
days
Standard Asset
is onewhich does not carry
more than normal risk
attached to the business and
which does not disclose any
problems.
12.
Sub Standard Asset
isone which has been
classified as NPA for a
period not exceeding 12
months.
13.
Doubtful Asset
is onewhich has been
classified as NPA for a period
exceeding 12 months.
14.
Loss Asset
Loss Assetis one where loss has
been identified by the bank or
internal or external auditors or
RBI Inspectors , but the amount
has not been written off.