A panel of recombinant monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish

A panel of recombinant monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish
neural receptors and secreted proteins suitable for wholemount
immunostaining
Nicole Staudta, Nicole Müller-Sienertha, Alla Fane-Dremuchevaa,1, Shahnaz P. Yusafa,2,
David Millrinea,3, and Gavin J. Wrighta,†
aWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1HH, UK.
Abstract
Cell surface receptors and secreted proteins play important roles in neural recognition processes,
but because their site of action can be a long distance from neuron cell bodies, antibodies that
label these proteins are valuable to understand their function. The zebrafish embryo is a popular
vertebrate model for neurobiology, but suffers from a paucity of validated antibody reagents.
Here, we use the entire ectodomain of neural zebrafish cell surface or secreted proteins expressed
in mammalian cells to select monoclonal antibodies to ten different antigens. The antibodies were
characterised by Western blotting and the sensitivity of their epitopes to formalin fixation was
determined. The rearranged antigen binding regions of the antibodies were amplified and cloned
which enabled expression in a recombinant form from a single plasmid. All ten antibodies gave
specific staining patterns within formalin-treated embryonic zebrafish brains, demonstrating that
this generalised approach is particularly efficient to elicit antibodies that stain native antigen in
fixed wholemount tissue. Finally, we show that additional tags can be easily added to the
recombinant antibodies for convenient multiplex staining. The antibodies and the approaches
described here will help to address the lack of well-defined antibody reagents in zebrafish
research.
Keywords
immunohistochemistry; monoclonal antibodies; neuron; receptor; zebrafish
© 2014 The Authors.
†
Corresponding Author: Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1HH, UK. gw2@sanger.ac.uk, tel: +44 (0)
1223 496852 .
1Current addresses: Kymab Limited, Meditrina (B260), Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK
2Biopharm Innovation BDU, Biopharm R&D, GlaxoSmithKline-Domantis, 315 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, CB4 0WG,
UK;
3Laboratory of Immune Regulation, Immunology Frontier Research Centre (IFReC), IFReC Research Building, Osaka University, 3-1
Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our
customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of
the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 January 02.
Published in final edited form as:
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 January 2; 456(1): 527–533. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.11.123.
NIH-PAAuthorManuscriptNIH-PAAuthorManuscriptNIH-PAAuthorManuscript

Introduction
The intercellular connectivity of neurons is critical for correct function, but detailed
descriptions of neuronal wiring circuits in vertebrates are still lacking, and their functional
outputs poorly understood [1]. Mapping neuronal networks is a challenging task because
vast numbers of neurons are densely packed within the central nervous system, and their
many processes often connect to neurons at anatomically distant sites [2]. Mechanistically,
the development of neuronal networks is regulated by a series of attractive and repulsive
cues mediated by factors that are secreted by, and displayed on the surface of cells within
the nervous system [3]. The expression of these guidance molecules is highly regulated and
identifying when and where they are expressed is important to obtain a molecular
understanding of neuronal network development and function. While important progress has
been made on the large scale documentation of gene expression patterns within the nervous
system, the technique usually used - in situ hybridisation - often only identifies the soma of
the neuron expressing the gene, and not their functional protein products. This is a particular
limitation for cell surface and secreted factors whose products typically function at a
distance away from the cell body of the neuron, making antibodies that work on fixed
neuronal tissue valuable reagents.
The zebrafish is an important model vertebrate organism for neurobiology [4]. The ex-utero
development of optically-translucent embryos, and a range of genetic tools provide a broad
technical platform for neurobiology research [5]. One limitation of the zebrafish model,
however, is the lack of high-quality antibody reagents that work on wholemount fixed tissue.
While monoclonal antibodies for use as tissue or cellular markers can easily be raised using
the “shotgun” method [6,7,8], their use is initially limited because the identity of the antigen
is at first unknown. The paucity of antibody reagents against defined zebrafish antigens is
particularly acute for cell surface and secreted proteins. One explanation is that the glycans
generally present on zebrafish extracellular proteins are highly immunogenic in mammals -
which are commonly used for raising antibodies - so that the elicited antibodies are often not
protein-specific [9]. Also, extracellular proteins are usually modified by glycans and
disulphide bonds which are not easily mimicked by chemically-synthesized peptides, which
are often used as antigens for generating antibodies. Together, these factors make raising
antibodies against zebrafish extracellular proteins a difficult process with uncertain
outcomes.
Recently, we reported systematic and scalable methods for the selection and cloning of
recombinant monoclonal antibodies [10,11,12]. Using a pooled immunisation approach, we
demonstrated that up to five monoclonal antibodies could be selected in parallel and cloned
into a single, convenient expression plasmid for distribution and storage. By using the entire
ectodomains of zebrafish cell surface proteins expressed in mammalian cells as antigens, we
show this approach is suitable for raising antibodies to neural receptors that work in
wholemount fixed tissue. We also extend the functionality of our antibodies by adding
additional protein tags to facilitate applications such as convenient multiplex staining.
Staudt et al. Page 2

Materials and Methods
Antigen and antibody expression and purification
All proteins were expressed in mammalian cells as recombinant proteins as described [11].
The extracellular regions of zebrafish cell surface and secreted proteins which were
previously used in protein interaction screens [13,14,15] were subcloned into a plasmid with
C-terminal rat Cd4 domains 3+4, an enzymatically biotinylatable peptide and 6-His tags
[16]. Biotinylation was achieved by cotransfecting a plasmid encoding a secreted E.coli
BirA enzyme [17], and proteins purified [18] before dialysing into PBS and storage at 4°C
until use. Recombinant antibodies were purified either using Protein G columns, or Ni-NTA
Sepharose if 6-His-tagged (Invitrogen).
Antibody selection, screening and cloning
Monoclonal antibodies were raised and screened by microarray printing as described [11].
Amplification of both the rearranged antibody light and heavy chain was performed using
total RNA extracted from ~106 hybridoma cells and both the amplified rearranged light and
heavy antibody variable regions were recombined with an overlapping “linker” fragment by
PCR and cloned into a single plasmid [10]. Plasmids encoding functional antibodies were
identified by colony PCR and expression selection [10,11]. The plasmids encoding all
recombinant antibodies can be obtained from Addgene [19].
Antibody validation by Western blotting and formalin fixation by ELISA
Western blotting was performed as described [18] using either non-reducing or reducing
conditions. Proteins were blotted onto PVDF membranes (Amersham), blocked in 2% BSA
and probed with ~10 μg/mL primary antibody for 1h at room temperature or at 4°C
overnight. ELISAs were performed essentially as described [17] using 100 μl of purified
recombinant antibody diluted in PBS/0.2% BSA. To test antibody epitopes for formalin
fixation sensitivity, immobilised protein ectodomains were incubated for up to 120 mins in
4% formalin and washed in PBS before the addition of the primary antibody.
Addition of alternative detection tags to recombinant antibodies
Sequences were added to the C-terminus of the IgG1 heavy chain to permit enzymatic
monobiotinylation and a 6-His-tag (Bio-6-His) to facilitate purification by IMAC [16], or a
FLAG tag were added using standard molecular biology procedures.
Immunohistochemistry
The animal experiments described in this study were performed in accordance with local and
national UK Home Office regulations. Zebrafish embryos were fixed with 4% formalin for
3h at room temperature or 4°C overnight, washed with PBT, and blocked (PBS, 10% goat
serum, 0.6% Triton and 1% DMSO) for 1h at room temperature. Purified recombinant
antibody was diluted 1:1 in 1% goat serum, 0.6% Triton and incubated overnight at 4°C.
Embryos were washed in PBST and incubated with a secondary anti-mouse-HRP for 2h at
room temperature. Antibodies were detected with a TSA signal amplification kit
(Invitrogen). For double labelling, Bio-6-His-tagged antibodies were detected with an anti-

Bio-HRP (BioRad) followed by TCA. Subsequently, the second antigen was labelled with a
FLAG-tagged antibody which was detected with an alkaline phosphatase coupled anti-
FLAG-antibody and visualized with Fast Red (Invitrogen).
Results
Preparation of neural extracellular protein antigens
To maximise the probability of selecting antibodies that recognise neural receptor proteins
in fixed tissue, we reasoned it was important to use antigens containing epitopes found on
the native protein. Extracellular proteins are posttranslationally modified with glycans and
disulphide bonds, and so we expressed the entire ectodomains as soluble recombinant
proteins in mammalian cells which add these modifications. We selected ten zebrafish
receptors from an existing protein library [13,14,15] which were expressed within the
developing zebrafish nervous system as determined by in situ hybridisation [15]. The
ectodomains were expressed with C-terminal tags that enabled enzymatic biotinylation and a
6-His tag for purification [16]. The purified proteins typically resolved as a single smear by
SDS-PAGE centred on their expected mass, presumably due to the presence of multiple
glycoforms (Fig. 1A).
Monoclonal antibody selection, cloning and initial validation
To efficiently select antibodies to multiple different antigens in parallel, we immunised mice
with pools of proteins and, after hybridoma generation and screening, antibodies of interest
were cloned into a single expression plasmid [10,12]. We found that plasmids encoding
functional antibodies were more easily identified using a transfection and ELISA-based
screening approach [11] rather than the sequencing method used previously [10]; antibodies
were then expressed recombinantly and purified. We first demonstrated that all antibodies
except one (anti-CD276) recognised their respective unreduced antigen whereas antibodies
to Sema4c, Bcan and Lrrc3b did not recognise reduced antigen suggesting they recognise a
conformational epitope (Fig. 1B). Because these antibodies will be used to detect antigens in
fixed tissue, we next quantified the rate at which the immunoreactivity of each antibody for
its antigen was lost upon formalin treatment. Eight out of the ten antibodies were insensitive
to fixation, but the antibodies recognising Robo1 and IgSF21b proteins did show some
sensitivity, informing us that these antibodies may lose immunoreactivity upon well-fixed
tissue (Fig. 1C).
Antibody staining patterns are consistent with localised transcript distribution in
wholemount fixed tissue
We next used the antibodies to stain zebrafish embryos to determine if our approach led to
the selection of antibodies that work on wholemount fixed tissue. Because a comprehensive
expression atlas for each antibody is beyond the remit of this study, we focused on the
developing zebrafish brain, and compared it to the corresponding in situ expression patterns
[15]. An overall summary of the staining patterns is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Three genes (ncam2, igsf21a, and brevican) are transcribed in discrete subpopulations of
neurons within the developing brain, and the antibodies detected the corresponding protein

products in the expected pattern. ncam2 transcripts are expressed by neurons giving rise to
the anterior (ac) and postoptic (poc) commissures at 30h (Fig. 2A) [20]. As expected, the
protein, which is implicated in neurite outgrowth [21], was located in these commissures at
2.5 dpf (Fig. 2AI), and other tracts (Fig. 2AII) including the dorso-ventral diencephalic tract
(dvdt), the tracts of the posterior (tpc) and postoptic (tpoc) commissures and in the retina
(Fig. 2AIII). Similarly, igsf21a is transcribed in the retina and telencephalic nuclei at 2.5 dpf
(Fig. 2B); correspondingly, the antibody strongly stained the retina (arrows in Fig. 2BI), and,
more weakly, the telencephalon (asterisk in Fig. 2BI) at 3 dpf. brevican is strongly
transcribed in the ventral longitudinal tract (vlt) and discrete neurons throughout the
forebrain (Fig. 2C), consistent with the antibody staining at 5 dpf within the vlt and
forebrain tracts, including punctate staining in structures surrounding the tracts (arrow in
Fig. 2CI). These results suggested that our antibodies could specifically stain their antigens
in fixed wholemount tissue.
Neural receptor genes transcribed throughput the developing brain have defined patterns
of protein localisation
We have previously shown that the remaining genes have diffuse in situ staining pattern
within the developing nervous system (Fig. 2D-J) [15]; however, the antibodies all labelled
discrete brain structures. For example, Igsf21b is located along the supraoptic tract (arrow in
Fig. 2DI) and the prethalamus, tegmentum and the vlt (Fig. 2DII). In the hindbrain, Igsf21b
is expressed in a stripy pattern, most likely axons leaving the vlt (Fig. 2DIII). Kitb was
localised in tracts and cells in the caudal brain region (Fig. 2EI), and CD276 in the
developing midbrain (Fig. 2FI). Lrrc3b was strongly expressed on axons within the tract of
the posterior commissure, the epiphysis, discrete regions in the telencephalon, hypothalamus
and the dorsal midbrain (Fig. 2GI). Dorsal views of the optic tectum showed Lrrc3b in
neuropil-rich regions (arrow in Fig. 2GII), often concentrated in punctate structures (asterisk
in Fig. 2GIII) and more medially along axons positioned in cell body-dense regions (arrow in
Fig. 2GIII). Robo is a guidance receptor and robo1-deficient zebrafish have defasciculated
axons in the forebrain [22], consistent with this, anti-Robo1 labelled many forebrain
commissures at 2 dpf, and some developing nuclei in the telencephalon. Robo1 is localised
in a line of cells starting in the dorsal thalamus leading to dorsal parts of the tegmentum
(arrow in Fig. 2HI). At this stage, there was clear labelling in the posterior hypothalamus
(arrowhead in Fig. 2HI). Precursor photoreceptor cells are labelled in the epiphysis and
axons projecting posteriorly from the epithalamus to the midbrain (asterisk in Fig. 2HI).
sema4c transcripts were expressed throughout the developing brain, but enriched in basal
parts of the fore-, mid- and hindbrain. The Sema4c protein was detected in the anterior and
postoptic commissures as well as in telencephalic nuclei and the olfactory epithelium (Fig.
2I). In the midbrain, Sema4c was located on the surface of cells at the dorsal and posterior
edge of the two tectal lobes. Finally, the Kita receptor is located in neurons within the
developing forebrain (arrow in Fig. 2JI), midbrain (arrow in Fig. 2JII) and in axon-rich
ventral regions of the rostral brain (Fig. 2JIII).
Neural receptor proteins are detected in discrete subcellular localisations
Neural cell surface receptor proteins are sometimes concentrated within specific subcellular
localisations such as synapses or even internal vesicles, providing clues to their functional

role. Sema4c was detected at the apical site of the olfactory epithelium (arrowhead in Fig.
3A) consistent with its documented role in olfaction [23]. Within the neuroepithelium (arrow
in Fig. 3A) and olfactory bulb (asterisk in Fig. 3A), Sema4c was detected within small
puncta, consistent with the distribution of the murine orthologue in synaptic vesicles [24].
Kita was localised along axon tracts (arrow in Fig. 3B) and also the surface of the cell body
(arrows in Fig. 3C); notably, neurons at the telencephalon-hypothalamus border were not
stained with anti-Kita (Fig. 3B). CD276 was detected within the anterior commissure and
was highly enriched on the surface of neurons in the telencephalon and hypothalamus (arrow
in Fig. 3D). In the embryonic midbrain, we found the highest concentration of CD276 on the
surface of posterior and lateral neurons, often concentrated in spots around a cell body
(arrow in Fig. 3E). Finally, anti-Igsf21b stained distinct spots within the developing
forebrain (arrow in Fig. 3F).
Convenient dual antibody labelling using interchangeable recombinant antibody tags
To facilitate multiplex staining applications, we constructed two plasmids containing C-
terminal tags placed after the antibody heavy chain that contained either a biotinylatable
peptide followed by a 6-His tag, or a FLAG tag (Fig. 4A). The regions encoding the anti-
Lrrc3b and Sema4C antibodies were subcloned into the Bio-6-His-tagged and FLAG-tagged
antibody plasmids respectively, expressed, purified, and used to simultaneously stain the
rostral nervous system at 5 dpf (Fig. 4A). At the same site in the same embryo, anti-Lrrc3b
detected with anti-Bio-HRP (Fig. 4B) and anti-Sema4c detected with an anti-FLAG-AP
(Fig. 4C) gave distinct expression patterns when merged (Fig. 4D). In the area of the
olfactory bulb, anti-Lrrc3b stained clustered puncta (arrow in Fig. 4BI), or in similarly-sized
rings (arrowhead in Fig. 4BI) whereas anti-Sema4c stained with a grainy appearance (arrow
in Fig. 4CI) with some larger, brighter staining (arrowhead in Fig. 4CI). At the junction of
the telencephalon and diencephalon, there was an increase in the Lrrc3b-positive structures
at the cellular periphery (arrow in Fig. 4BII). Finally, Lrrc3b was again detected in
subcellular puncta at the cellular periphery (arrow in Fig. 4BIII) whereas Sema4c was
detected in a more diffuse pattern around cell bodies (arrows in Fig. 4CIII). Lrrc3b and
Sema4c were colocalised at some sites (arrows in Fig. 4DIII). These plasmids enable rapid
and convenient switching of protein tags on recombinant antibodies by simple subcloning
procedures, and permit the simultaneous use of these antibodies in double or even triple
antibody labelling experiments.
Discussion
The zebrafish is now a well-established model organism for neurobiology research and has
proved particularly valuable for studying the very earliest stages of vertebrate neural
development. Despite a diverse genetic toolkit, zebrafish research is hampered by the lack of
good quality antibodies that work in fixed tissue. Here, we have shown that using the entire
ectodomains of receptors expressed in mammalian cells - and therefore contain structurally-
critical posttranslational modifications such as glycans and disulphide bonds - can elicit
antibodies that stain native antigen within fixed embryos; indeed, all ten antibodies that we
selected to different antigens worked in this application. Antigens that lack these
modifications such as peptides are less likely to contain native epitopes that consequently

result in antibodies that are unable to recognise the native protein. Our results suggest that
the additional resource required to express proteins in mammalian cells is recouped by a
greater probability of the antibody working on fixed tissue.
We have used this method to select a panel of ten monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish
cell surface receptors expressed in the developing nervous system. Because of its
experimental convenience, in situ hybridisation has been the major tool to determine where
genes are transcribed during early zebrafish development [25]. In the three instances where
the gene transcripts were localised by in situ hybridisation to identifiable subpopulations of
neurons (ncam2, igsf21a and brevican), the corresponding protein gave the expected
staining pattern, although typically along the projecting axons rather than the soma of the
neuron as might be expected. Many genes encoding neural receptor proteins, however, are
expressed throughout the developing brain using standard in situ protocols making
hypotheses regarding their functional role challenging. In the seven remaining examples
where transcripts were not localised, the antibody staining revealed the protein product was
localised to specific brain regions, and in some examples, also had a defined subcellular
localisation.
Recombinantly cloning antibodies has the advantage that they can be modified with
additional functional groups relatively easily. Here, we have added biochemical tags which
enable enzymatic monobiotinylation with an oligo-histidine tag, and also a FLAG tag. By
using different tags, multiple primary and subsequently secondary antibodies can be
simultaneously added to a staining reaction, cutting down the time required for dual
labelling experiments significantly. It would be a relatively simple procedure to add
additional tags to the recombinant antibodies to facilitate different detection methods or
other functions.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated across a panel of ten zebrafish neural receptors an
effective method that frequently leads to the selection of monoclonal antibodies that can be
used to detect the native protein in fixed tissue. While the antibodies described here will be
useful for neurobiology research, the general approach of expressing receptor ectodomains
in mammalian cells could be similarly applied to receptors expressed in other tissues.
Finally, the methods and antibodies described here will help to address the paucity of
validated antibodies for zebrafish research.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health [RO1 NS063400] and the Wellcome
Trust [098051]. We thank Nick Harman and Paul Green for animal care and members of the Wright laboratory for
informative discussions and experimental help.

References
[1]. Lichtman JW, Denk W. The big and the small: challenges of imaging the brain’s circuits. Science.
2011; 334:618–623. [PubMed: 22053041]
[2]. Morgan JL, Lichtman JW. Why not connectomics? Nat Methods. 2013; 10:494–500. [PubMed:
23722208]
[3]. O’Donnell M, Chance RK, Bashaw GJ. Axon growth and guidance: receptor regulation and signal
transduction. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009; 32:383–412. [PubMed: 19400716]
[4]. Friedrich RW, Jacobson GA, Zhu P. Circuit neuroscience in zebrafish. Curr Biol. 2010; 20:R371–
381. [PubMed: 21749961]
[5]. Pan YA, Freundlich T, Weissman TA, Schoppik D, Wang XC, Zimmerman S, Ciruna B, Sanes
JR, Lichtman JW, Schier AF. Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage
analysis in zebrafish. Development. 2013; 140:2835–2846. [PubMed: 23757414]
[6]. Trevarrow B, Marks DL, Kimmel CB. Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish
embryo. Neuron. 1990; 4:669–679. [PubMed: 2344406]
[7]. Crosnier C, Vargesson N, Gschmeissner S, Ariza-McNaughton L, Morrison A, Lewis J. Delta-
Notch signalling controls commitment to a secretory fate in the zebrafish intestine. Development.
2005; 132:1093–1104. [PubMed: 15689380]
[8]. Deflorian G, Cinquanta M, Beretta C, Venuto A, Santoriello C, Baldessari D, Pezzimenti F,
Aliprandi M, Mione M, de Marco A. Monoclonal antibodies isolated by large-scale screening are
suitable for labeling adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) tissues and cell structures. J Immunol Methods.
2009; 346:9–17. [PubMed: 19410577]
[9]. Traver D, Paw BH, Poss KD, Penberthy WT, Lin S, Zon LI. Transplantation and in vivo imaging
of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4:1238–1246.
[PubMed: 14608381]
[10]. Crosnier C, Staudt N, Wright GJ. A rapid and scalable method for selecting recombinant mouse
monoclonal antibodies. BMC Biol. 2010; 8:76. [PubMed: 20525357]
[11]. Staudt N, Muller-Sienerth N, Wright GJ. Development of an antigen microarray for high
throughput monoclonal antibody selection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014; 445:785–790.
[PubMed: 24472540]
[12]. Muller-Sienerth N, Crosnier C, Wright GJ, Staudt N. Cloning of recombinant monoclonal
antibodies from hybridomas in a single mammalian expression plasmid. Methods Mol Biol.
2014; 1131:229–240. [PubMed: 24515469]
[13]. Bushell KM, Sollner C, Schuster-Boeckler B, Bateman A, Wright GJ. Large-scale screening for
novel low-affinity extracellular protein interactions. Genome Res. 2008; 18:622–630. [PubMed:
18296487]
[14]. Sollner C, Wright GJ. A cell surface interaction network of neural leucine-rich repeat receptors.
Genome Biol. 2009; 10:R99. [PubMed: 19765300]
[15]. Martin S, Sollner C, Charoensawan V, Adryan B, Thisse B, Thisse C, Teichmann S, Wright GJ.
Construction of a large extracellular protein interaction network and its resolution by
spatiotemporal expression profiling. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010; 9:2654–2665. [PubMed:
20802085]
[16]. Sun Y, Gallagher-Jones M, Barker C, Wright GJ. A benchmarked protein microarray-based
platform for the identification of novel low-affinity extracellular protein interactions. Anal
Biochem. 2012; 424:45–53. [PubMed: 22342946]
[17]. Kerr JS, Wright GJ. Avidity-based extracellular interaction screening (AVEXIS) for the scalable
detection of low-affinity extracellular receptor-ligand interactions. J Vis Exp. 2012:e3881.
[PubMed: 22414956]
[18]. Bartholdson SJ, Bustamante LY, Crosnier C, Johnson S, Lea S, Rayner JC, Wright GJ.
Semaphorin-7A is an erythrocyte receptor for P. falciparum merozoite-specific TRAP homolog,
MTRAP. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8:e1003031. [PubMed: 23166499]
[19]. Herscovitch M, Perkins E, Baltus A, Fan M. Addgene provides an open forum for plasmid
sharing. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30:316–317. [PubMed: 22491276]

[20]. Mizuno T, Kawasaki M, Nakahira M, Kagamiyama H, Kikuchi Y, Okamoto H, Mori K,
Yoshihara Y. Molecular diversity in zebrafish NCAM family: three members with different
VASE usage and distinct localization. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001; 18:119–130. [PubMed:
11461158]
[21]. Winther M, Berezin V, Walmod PS. NCAM2/OCAM/RNCAM: cell adhesion molecule with a
role in neuronal compartmentalization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012; 44:441–446. [PubMed:
22155300]
[22]. Devine CA, Key B. Robo-Slit interactions regulate longitudinal axon pathfinding in the
embryonic vertebrate brain. Dev Biol. 2008; 313:371–383. [PubMed: 18061159]
[23]. Williams-Hogarth LC, Puche AC, Torrey C, Cai X, Song I, Kolodkin AL, Shipley MT, Ronnett
GV. Expression of semaphorins in developing and regenerating olfactory epithelium. J Comp
Neurol. 2000; 423:565–578. [PubMed: 10880988]
[24]. Inagaki S, Ohoka Y, Sugimoto H, Fujioka S, Amazaki M, Kurinami H, Miyazaki N, Tohyama M,
Furuyama T. Sema4c, a transmembrane semaphorin, interacts with a post-synaptic density
protein, PSD-95. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:9174–9181. [PubMed: 11134026]
[25]. Thisse C, Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat
Protoc. 2008; 3:59–69. [PubMed: 18193022]

Highlights
• A panel of ten recombinant monoclonal antibodies to zebrafish neural receptors
• Antibodies tested on fixed wholemount tissue
• Antibodies cloned into single, openly available expression plasmids
• Multiple recombinant antibody tags facilitate simultaneous multi-antigen
staining

Figure 1. Most antibodies work in Western blotting and recognise epitopes that are insensitive to
formalin fixation
(A) Purified recombinant proteins were resolved at their expected mass by SDS-PAGE. (B)
Antibodies were tested in Western blotting against both reduced (r) and non-reduced (n)
antigens as indicated. The antibodies against Sema4c, Bcan, and Lrrc3b were sensitive to
reduction of the protein suggesting they bind conformational epitopes, whereas those
recognising Robo1, Igsf21a, Igsf21b, Ncam2 and Kitb recognised both reduced and non-
reduced antigen. The antibody against CD276 repeatedly did not recognise antigen by
Western blot. (C) The sensitivity of antibody epitopes to formalin fixation was evaluated.
Antigens were fixed with 4% formalin for 0, 30 or 120 minutes and the fractional loss of
immunoreactivity was quantified by ELISA. The majority of antibodies bound epitopes that
were insensitive to formalin-fixation, although immunoreactivity of anti-Igsf21b- and anti-
Robo1 antibodies decreased significantly after 120 minutes. Note that the antigen and
antibody analysis for Kita is not shown.

Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry of the embryonic zebrafish brain with monoclonal antibodies to
neural receptors and secreted proteins
The embryo stage and transcript/protein are indicated within each subpanel and staining
patterns described within the main text. Transcript localisation is shown by wholemount in
situ hybridisation as brightfield images; images of antibody staining are taken by confocal
microscopy (red); nuclei are stained with DAPI in GII (green). Note that some antibody
staining, for example Igsf21a in the ventral diencephalon (BI), is outside of the optical plane.
Orientation of the embryos is always anterior to the left with ventral views in A, AI, DI, II
and JI; lateral in AII, C, CI, D, DII, DIII, E, EI, G, GI, H, HI, J and JIII; and dorsal in AIII,B,
BI, F, FI, GII, GIII, I and JII. Scale bars represent 100 μm in CI and EI, for all other images 50
μm. Abbreviations used in all figures are: ac = anterior commissure, dvdt = dorso-ventral
diencephalic tract, epi = epithalamus, hind = hindbrain, hypo = hypothalamus, MHB = mid-
hindbrain boundary, mid = midbrain, ob: olfactory bulb, oe = olfactory epithelium, poc =
postoptic commissure, sot = supraoptic tract, tec = tectum, teg = tegmentum, tel =
telencephalon, th = thalamus, tpc = tract of the posterior commissure, tpoc = tract of the
postoptic commissure, vlt = ventral longitudinal tract, vnc: ventral nerve cord, hpf = hours
post-fertilisation, dpf = days post-fertilisation.

Figure 3. Antibodies detect neural receptor proteins within discrete subcellular localisations
(A) Anti-Sema4c staining in the anterior neuroepithelium. (B) Anti-Kita labels the anterior
(ac) and postoptic (poc) commissures and is also enriched at the periphery of cells (arrow).
(C) Anti-Kita also stained axons of the ventral nerve cord (vnc) and the surface of hindbrain
cells. Anti-CD276 staining in the developing midbrain (D), and tectum (E). (F) Anti-Igsf21b
stained axon-rich regions in the anterior forebrain where it was often concentrated in
discrete puncta (arrow). Views are anterior to the left and dorsal for A and E, lateral for B,C
and F, ventral for D. Scale bars represent 100 μm in (A) and 50 μm in (B-F).

Figure 4. The addition of different tags facilitates multiplex staining
(A) Schematics showing the addition of C-terminal Bio-6-His and FLAG tags to plasmids.
The region encoding the specific antibodies are flanked by unique NotI and AscI sites
facilitating antibody tag switching by subcloning. (B-D) The same 5 dpf embryo was
simultaneously stained with both the biotin-tagged anti-Lrrc3b and FLAG-tagged anti-
Sema4c antibodies. The staining of anti-Lrrc3b in green (B) and anti-Sema4c in red (C),
together with the merged images (D) at the same site are shown. Staining patterns are
described in the main text. Scale bars represent 50 μm.

A panel of recombinant monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (9)

Similar to A panel of recombinant monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish (20)

More from Shahnaz Yusaf (6)

A panel of recombinant monoclonal antibodies against zebrafish