Reasons to Avoid
Presentation Software


  Dangerous Visual Compulsions
Opportunities
or Compulsions?
Opportunity vs. Compulsion

  “The opportunities to produce further
  and further ‘generations’ of
  contrivances are indistinguishable from
  the compulsions to do so.”
 (Kenneth Burke, Attitudes Toward
  History, p. 396.)
A Few Worries about
      Powerpoint-style


 Why I worry about using powerpoint or similar
  methods of pedagogy in classes.

 Not why EVERYONE should worry
Remember “conversations”?

 Before there were presentations,
  there were conversations, which
  were a little like presentations but
  used fewer bullet points, and no one
  had to dim the lights.
Powerpoint conditions us to
"deliver content"
 helps you make a case,
 but it also


 makes its own case:
   about how to organize information,
   how much information to organize,
   how to look at the world.
Conditions Users’ Frame


Shepherds users toward
  a staccato,
  summarizing
...frame of mind.
Bad Result: Distances
 presenter from audience
Instead of human contact, we are given human
  display.

BUT:
 Real conversations involve give and take to
  arrive at a new answer.
 Powerpoint encourages us to present to each
  other, instead of taking risks and engaging.
Bad Result : Wastes Prep
  Time with formatting
Talented and highly paid people spend hours formatting
  slides
 Rather than concentrating on what to say.


Imagine: 100, 000 professors and executives pondering:
 Arial? Times Roman?
 Twenty-four point? Eighteen point?’
Disguises or hides logical
flaws
Disguises or hides logical
flaws
Information Conveyor


 Professor Clifford Nass at Stanford:
  For the student...
    PowerPoint “lowers the ceiling”
What the student loses

 "What you miss is the process. The classes I
  remember most, the professors I remember
  most, were the ones where you could watch
  how they thought. You don’t remember what
  they said, the details. It was ‘What an elegant
  way to wrap around a problem!’
 PowerPoint takes that away. PowerPoint gives
  you the outcome, but it removes the process.”
What the professor loses

 Nass: As a professor, “What I miss is, when I used to
  lecture without PowerPoint, every now and then I’d
  get a cool idea...[and] I just went for it —twenty-five
  minutes. And to this day students who were in that
  class remember it.

 Now, that couldn’t happen because students will ask:
 ‘Where the hell is the slide?’
Information is not all

Professors can and ought to be:
rhetoricians
storytellers
poets
  as well as "content providers."
In other words
“Expertise” must be...

...an adjective which applies

to a whole range of abilities
Lesson: Let’s be Careful
out there!

A powerpoint against powerpoint.key

  • 1.
    Reasons to Avoid PresentationSoftware Dangerous Visual Compulsions
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Opportunity vs. Compulsion  “The opportunities to produce further and further ‘generations’ of contrivances are indistinguishable from the compulsions to do so.” (Kenneth Burke, Attitudes Toward History, p. 396.)
  • 5.
    A Few Worriesabout Powerpoint-style  Why I worry about using powerpoint or similar methods of pedagogy in classes.  Not why EVERYONE should worry
  • 7.
    Remember “conversations”? Beforethere were presentations, there were conversations, which were a little like presentations but used fewer bullet points, and no one had to dim the lights.
  • 8.
    Powerpoint conditions usto "deliver content"  helps you make a case,  but it also  makes its own case: about how to organize information, how much information to organize, how to look at the world.
  • 9.
    Conditions Users’ Frame Shepherdsusers toward a staccato, summarizing ...frame of mind.
  • 10.
    Bad Result: Distances presenter from audience Instead of human contact, we are given human display. BUT:  Real conversations involve give and take to arrive at a new answer.  Powerpoint encourages us to present to each other, instead of taking risks and engaging.
  • 11.
    Bad Result :Wastes Prep Time with formatting Talented and highly paid people spend hours formatting slides  Rather than concentrating on what to say. Imagine: 100, 000 professors and executives pondering:  Arial? Times Roman?  Twenty-four point? Eighteen point?’
  • 12.
    Disguises or hideslogical flaws
  • 13.
    Disguises or hideslogical flaws
  • 14.
    Information Conveyor ProfessorClifford Nass at Stanford: For the student... PowerPoint “lowers the ceiling”
  • 15.
    What the studentloses  "What you miss is the process. The classes I remember most, the professors I remember most, were the ones where you could watch how they thought. You don’t remember what they said, the details. It was ‘What an elegant way to wrap around a problem!’  PowerPoint takes that away. PowerPoint gives you the outcome, but it removes the process.”
  • 16.
    What the professorloses  Nass: As a professor, “What I miss is, when I used to lecture without PowerPoint, every now and then I’d get a cool idea...[and] I just went for it —twenty-five minutes. And to this day students who were in that class remember it.  Now, that couldn’t happen because students will ask:  ‘Where the hell is the slide?’
  • 17.
    Information is notall Professors can and ought to be: rhetoricians storytellers poets as well as "content providers."
  • 18.
    In other words “Expertise”must be... ...an adjective which applies to a whole range of abilities
  • 19.
    Lesson: Let’s beCareful out there!

Editor's Notes