A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER

International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, Feb., 2017.
©IJAET ISSN: 22311963
84 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED
POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
Dheeraj Kumar Dhaked and Mahendra Lalwani
Department of Electrical Engineering,
Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, India
ABSTRACT
Modern FACTS controllers are being used to control the power through the modern power transmission system.
The power transfer can be controlled by using these FACTS controllers in an efficient and effective manner
through transmission lines. FACTS controllers are having some drawbacks i.e. their bulky size, higher cost,
reliability and break-in the transmission line, which makes it obsolete to use in modern power system network
where the system is forthcoming towards the smart grid system. These drawbacks can be fulfilled by using new
compound, scalable, light weighted and cost effective devices that are distributed-FACTS (D-FACTS). D-
FACTS controllers are distributed version of conventional lumped FACTS controllers and their cost is low due
to lower ratings of component and reliability also increases due to redundancy of devices. The Enhanced Power
Flow Controller (EPFC) is a D-FACTS controller which is distributed version of thyristor controlled series
controller. EPFC controllers are used in series at small distance gap at every 5-10 km distance with
transmission line to control the power flow. This paper discusses extensive review of the EPFC controller and
its application in modern power system era.
KEYWORDS: D-FACTS, TCSC, EPFC, FACTS Controller, Power flow control
I. INTRODUCTION
The demand of electrical energy is increasing day by day. In the developing countries like India,
increasing demand rate is much higher and the generation of electrical energy is insufficient to
achieve the increasing demand, so it is important to fulfil the gap of demand and generation by
increasing the loading capability of transmission system or by developing the new transmission
systems. Though, it’s very challenging to develop the new transmission system due to the high capital
cost, limited energy resources, and time and land restrictions [1, 2]. The increasing loads demand can
be supplied by increasing the loading capability of existing transmission lines up to their thermal
limits and decreasing the transmission lines losses [3-5]. About 2-3 decades ago, FACTS controllers
were developed to increase the loading capability of transmission lines as these can function as
reactive power source and generator to the power system [6, 7]. The advantage of FACTS technology
is their reliability, quick response, easy controlling and enhanced flexibility. There are various
FACTS devices based on voltage source converters and current source converters, i.e. Static
Compensator (STATCOM), Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC), Thyristor controlled
series controller (TCSC) and Unified/Interline Power Flow Controller (UPFC/IPFC) that are operating
physically in the current power system [8]. These FACTS devices are connected in different type of
connections with transmission lines e.g. shunt controllers, series controllers and their combinations of
series-shunt controllers and series-series controllers [9].
Recently an alternative approach based on cost-effective and scalable series impedance device that
named as D-FACTS has been presented [5, 10, 11]. These D-FACTS devices are better in reliability,
easy controlling, cost effective, and less weighted than conventional FACTS devices [11]. These D-
FACTS devices have been emerged as an alternative approach instead of conventional FACTS
devices for power flow control and enhancement of power transfer from generating station to

85 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
receiving station. The one thing is also noticeable that saving of electrical energy by D-FACTS
devices reflects on coal consumption and environmental pollution by minimizing transmission losses
and enhancing the loading capability that is also a very good advantage [12].
EPFC is a series D-FACTS device which works on impedance injection in the transmission line and
alters the transmission line impedance to enhance the power flowing through transmission line. This
device is mounted on the transmission line as small modules by using single turn transformer (STT).
These D-FACTS devices works on two modes of operation which are by-pass mode and
compensation mode, during by-pass mode it bypasses the power under the fault conditions through
the parallel connected back to back thyristor switches and during compensation mode of operation the
transmission line impedance is compensated for power flow control. The TCSC is also a series
FACTS controller which changes the line impedance of system. This paper mainly discusses about
development of FACTS and D-FACTS controller along with EPFC controller. EPFC controller is a
distributed version of TCSC topology [13, 14].
This paper is structured as follows: Section II discusses about generation of FACTS controllers and
their classification which is also shown in Figure 1. Section III presents series FACTS controller and
comparison with conventional FACTS controller and the Section IV constitutes EPFC controller and
its working with its characteristics. Section V contains conclusion of paper which is followed by
future scope of EPFC controller in modern transmission system.
II. FACTS GENERATION WITH PROPOSED WORK IN INDIA
Our system has numerous FACTS controller in power systems which were generated with time in a
specified manner which are shown in Figure 1 and proposed work of FACTS controllers are also
given in Tables 1 & 2.
2.1. GENERATION OF FACTS CONTROLLERS AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION
In last few decades due to rapid increment in power demand the traditional methodology of power
system has changed. Now, for power flow increment and to fulfil the power demand FACTS
controller has been introduced. These devices make better utilization of existing power transmission
line and increases power transfer capacity up to thermal limit. The transmission line parameters like
impedance, bus voltage, and phase angle can be changed by these devices in very efficient manner
[15, 16].
The subsequent generation of FACTS controllers [7, 17] is given in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Generation of FACTS devices
The FACTS controller are mainly classified into four groups as shunt controller, series controller,
combined series-series controller and combined series-shunt controllers. This classification is based
on the connections of FACTS controllers with transmission lines. For switching of these FACTS
controllers power electronics switches like thyristor, MOSFET, GTO and IGBT are used [13, 14].
By using different FACTS controllers, power transfer capacity through transmission lines can be
increased in such a manner that their thermal limit do not get violated, losses minimized, power
transfer increases, stability margin increases [18-20] etc.

86 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
Main different objectives of FACTS controller in power systems:
 FACTS can be used for voltage stability limit improvement
 Sub synchronous resonance problems can be resolved
 Damping problems can be resolved in existing system
 Short circuit currents in transmission line can be decreased
 To improve transmission line’s transient stability limits in system
FACTS controllers are characteristically high-power, high-voltage power controllers, which
operates for the range of 138–500 kV and 10–300 MVA, that are used to boost power flow in the
transmission and distribution systems [3]. Shunt FACTS controllers such as the static VAR
compensator (SVC) and STATCOM, have been most widely used for reactive VAR compensation
and voltage support for power system. Series devices such as the TCSC and the SSSC can be used
for controlling active power flow on transmission lines. Series-shunt devices such as the UPFC can
be used for voltage support and controlling of active power flow both with maximum flexibility,
and higher cost.
2.2. PROPOSED WORK ON FACTS IN INDIA
The demand of reactive power deteriorates the voltage profile and can cause system to make unstable
and decreases the reliability. To overcome this problem some reactors (controlled and switchable)
were proposed for reactive power support and to strengthen the voltage profile in the grid at different
voltage levels [16]. STATCOM controllers are proposed at some strategic locations for dynamic
voltage support in India which are 220 kV voltage level and their estimated cost is 57.70 Crore R each
as shown in Table 1 [21].
Table 1. Suggested STATCOM installation projects in India
The STATCOM controller installation project is accounted around 704 Crore R and these STATCOM
controllers will be located at different proposed places from north to south in India. These controllers
are cheaper instead of SVC at same rating when both are shunt connected controllers and used for
increase power transfer and reactive power compensation. Some Bus reactors (controlled and
switchable) are proposed at strategic locations for dynamic voltage support in which and 21 nos. are
switchable bus reactors in India as shown in Table 2.
D. Divan and H. Johal gave a term Distributed-FACTS in 2007 that has been emerged as a new
technology for power flow control through transmission line instead of conventional FACTS
controller. The D-FACTS controllers has advantages over conventional FACTS controllers as D-
FACTS are cheaper and distributed over whole transmission line in small modules. The main
advantage is that D-FACTS controllers don’t require any break-in the transmission line and existing
transmission network can be used to increase the power flow.
Table 2. Suggested switchable bus reactors Installation projects in India
State Sub-Station Location MVAR ratings
Jammu-Kashmir Budgam s/s (+)125/(-)25
Jammu-Kashmir Udhampur s/s (+)125/(-)25
Rajasthan Tinwari s/s (+)50/(-)100
Andhra Pradesh Urvakonda s/s (+)100/(-)100
Maharashtra Vita/Pandharpur s/s (+)50/(-)100
Karnataka Chitradurga s/s (+)50/(-)100
Gujarat Radhanpur s/s (+)50/(-)100
Tamil Nadu Theni s/s (+)100/(-)50
Tamil Nadu Kodikuruchi s/s (+)100/(-)50
Tamil Nadu Udaythu s/s (+)100/(-)50
State Sub-station Location No. of units
Rajasthan Bhadla, Akal, Bikaner, Jaisalmer 4
Maharashtra Alkud 1
Gujarat Solar Park-II 1
Andhra Pradesh Kondapur, Hindupur 2
Karnatka Davangiri, Hiriyur 2

87 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
III. SERIES FACTS CONTROLLER AND COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL
FACTS CONTROLLER
The series D-FACTS controller and their working method have been explained and the comparisons
are also made with conventional FACTS controllers. The EPFC controller is also defined with its
working methods.
3.1. SERIES DISTRIBUTD FACTS CONTROLLER
The transmission lines reactance is assumed to be purely inductive in nature. The impedance of line
can be changed by injection of series passive capacitive or inductive elements in the transmission line
and power flow transfer can be changed [7, 18, 19]. D-FACTS device can be used to change the series
impedance of transmission line. D-FACTS are the advanced FACTS technology which is distributed
over the whole transmission line as small modules between the small span of transmission lines as
seen in Figure 2 and they can offer series capacitive or inductive reactance in the line through STT [3,
20].
Figure 2. D-FACTS module connected on transmission lines
The conventional series FACTS devices like TCSC and thyristor controlled PST (TCPST) can
control the power flow in transmission line by changing phase angle ( ) and line Impedance (Z)
[22, 23]. But conventional FACTS devices increase the cost and complexity of the system because
they require break in the line and a high voltage platform. For this control series D-FACTS devices
emerged as a substitute to control the power flow between lines which is a cost effective and simple
device [24]. Figure 2 shows the D-FACTS modules connected on a power transmission line to
control the power flow by changing the line impedance. Every module is rated about 10 kVA and
floats on line both electrically and mechanically over transmission line. A large number of modules
are working together to change the impedance or they can leave it unchanged. These modules work
at extremely low cost and have high system reliability and there is no effect on system operation of
some modules failure.
These D-FACTS devices are connected on transmission line by using a STT where transmission
line acts as primary winding of transformer and secondary of transformer is connected with an
inductor and a capacitor, both inductor and capacitor are connected parallel to each other with the
secondary of STT. Inductor has back to back connected power electronic switches (IGBT or
Thyristor). By using power electronics switches, injection of inductor can be controlled in circuit by
firing pulses and the impedance of secondary side connected circuitry can be changed as shown in
Figure 3 and this secondary impedance can be transferred to primary by multiplying the square of
turn ratio of transformer, thus the line impedance can be changed.

88 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
Figure 3. Simplified schematic of a D-FACTS device
The power transfer can be changed in parallel lines when one is under loaded and other is
overloaded. The under loaded lines power transfer can be increased up to their thermal limits by
decreasing the total impedance of transmission line and overloaded lines power transfer can be
decreased up to their safe limits of power transfer capability by increasing the total impedance of
transmission line. Thus D-FACTS devices are efficient, cheap, less complex and easy controlling
devices than conventional FACTS devices.
3.2. COMPARISION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL FACTS AND D-FACTS
Conventional Facts has various advantages [23-25] and it has been also technically proven but the D-
FACTS devices have some extra benefits like cost effectiveness, less weighted, easily controllable,
reliable, doesn’t require break-in the line, less maintenance, less repair time etc. On the basis of these
benefits the D-FACTS devices can be proven much beneficiary instead of conventional FACTS
controllers [4, 26] which are listed in Table 3 and it is shown that the cost of D-FACTS controller is
cheaper than the conventional facts devices.
The cost of different FACTS devices and EPFC are shown in Figure 4 [27-33] and the simulation
model for distributed power flow controller (DPFC) is also have same characteristics which is
distributed version of UPFC FACTS controller [34]. It is observed that EPFC is cheaper than other
conventional FACTS controllers [35-38].
Figure 4. Cost comparison of various conventional FACTS and controller
The static data for power rating and weight is also an issue for the less use of conventional FACTS
rather than D-FACTS Controllers as shown in Table 4 by comprising conventional FACTS and D-
21600 21600
27000 27000 27000
11000
SVC TCSC STATCOM UPFC series part UPFC shunt part EPFC
SVC TCSC STATCOM UPFC series part UPFC shunt part EPFC
Cost(rupees)
Transmission Line
Sending
end
STT
S
SC
SL
C
L
Receiving
end
σ
control
Normally
Close
Normally
Open

89 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
FACTS devices [9-11] and it has been shown that D-FACTS controllers are light in weight so these
can be mounted on transmission lines.
IV. ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER (EPFC)
EPFC is a kind of D-FACTS controller which is distributed version of TCSC FACTS controller. The
simplified schematic diagram of proposed EPFC is shown in Figure 5 where a STT is connected with
transmission line. The shunt connected inductor and capacitor are connected with secondary of STT
with switch (SL) and (SC) and it is also shown that switch (SL) is controlled with conduction angle
control technique switch (SC) is normally closed and switch S is normally remains open. The switch S
is also connected in parallel with inductor and capacitors which is used in by-pass mode of operation.
Table 3. Comparision between conventional FACTS and D-FACTS
Characteristics Conventional FACTS D-FACTS
Break-in the Line Required Doesn’t Require
Cost Very costly than
D-FACTS
Cheap
Size Larger than D-FACTS Small modules
Nature Lumped Distributed over whole Line
Weight Higher than D-FACTS Very less around (50-60) per module
Best Location to use Can be used on line any
where
Used on very small span of line about (1-2 mile
for each module)
Control arrangements Complex Easy
Maintenance Required and costly Doesn’t require, if required not too costly
Repair Time Mean time to repair is
much
Repaired single module which doesn’t affect the
line performance so no time required
Conventional
transmission line
Cannot be used, it requires
some changes.
Conventional transmission line can be used
Effects of fault on
devices
May get damaged By-passes the current so no chances to get
damaged
Single point failure
effect
Entire system may get
damaged
No effect of single point failure
Future up-gradation Not compatible Compatible and easily upgradable
Work force Skilled workforce required Doesn’t require because it can be repaired in
factories as it is small in size
The EPFC mainly changes the impedance of transmission line by controlling the effective impedance
by continuously varying the conduction angle ( ) of thyristor switch. EPFC is mounted on
transmission line and connected in series to alter the transmission line impedance. Switch (SC) is
always turn on means capacitor is normally connected in parallel with secondary of STT.
Table 4. Comparison between FACTS and D-FACTS on the basis of weight and power
Total inductive and capacitive reactance of EPFC is given by Xl and Xc respectively and Xleak is the
leakage reactance of STT. The EPFC works in two modes of operations which are discussed below:
4.1. BY-PASS MODE
The device operates in by-pass mode during fault condition and the device can be saved from damage
due to high fault currents. The fault currents can be of 50000 A (75000 A peak), which can cause
damage to the switches and control circuitry so this is very important to switch over to bypass mode
whenever fault takes place. During this mode of operation no current flows through inductor and
Constraints Conventional FACTS D-FACTS
Power rating 10-300 MVA per module 10 kVA per module
Weight 280-300 kg /10 kVA (average data) 50-60 kg. per module

90 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
capacitor. Because the current is very high so it can cause harm to enhanced power flow controller.
During faulty condition or strokes period secondary protection is provided as a break-over device that
is attached between outer casing of transformer and cable to provide different path. Than Effective
inserted reactance (Xinserted) in line during by-pass mode is:
leakinserted XX  (1)
Figure 5. Simplified schematic of the proposed EPFC
4.2. COMPENSATION MODE
Capacitor is normally connected during the compensation mode and the inductance is connected with
back to back thyristor switches which are controlled by conduction angle control technique. The
conduction angle control feedback is given by feedback of control circuitry. During the compensation
mode the switch (S) is normally disconnected and switch (SC) is also connected and switch (SL)
controls the total effective impedance insertion of EPFC. The series capacitance insertion of EPFC
affects the transmission line currents. Once an EPFC is inserted in transmission line the current
doesn’t remains sinusoidal due to the switching of EPFC and parallel combination of L and C. The
total effective inserted reactance (Xinserted) in line during this mode is given by:
)||( cllineInserted XXXX  (2)
when, XL > XC then only EPFC works in capacitive mode of operation and when XL < XC than EPFC
works in inductive mode of operation and when these are equal than causes a sub-synchronous
problem.
V. CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents a review on new approach to control power flow in transmission and distribution
lines. D-FACTS controller uses economically available low power devices that offer the potential to
reduce the cost of power flow control. Series VAR compensation using D-FACTS controller would
help utilities to improve grid congestion, accepts delay in construction of new transmission lines, and
increases system capability. D-FACTS device doesn’t require change in utility structure and operate
separately, with or without communications. These devices can operate with or without
communication and continues the operation of the system during contingency periods. Under
contingency periods the modules can return back to bypassed mode of operation. The high
consistency, lesser cost and durability of these new devices makes them all the more eye-catching to
use in power system.
There are numerous possibilities for this work to extend in the field of power flow control by using
EPFC controller in power system. The control circuit can employ fuzzy controller, PI controller or
adaptive PI fuzzy controller. The devices can also be set to work on PV cells or wind power
Transmission Line
Sending
end
STT
S
SC
SL
C
L
Receiving
end
σ
control
Normally
Close
Normally
Open

91 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
(renewable energy sources). This work can also be extended for lesser distance gap modules in
practical use.
In D-FACTS devices, the EPFC is a new power controlling device, which is distributed version of
TCSC FACTS controller. This changes transmission line impedance to improve the power transfer
capability and has smooth controlling of power flow.
REFERENCES
[1]. N. G. Hingorani & L. Gyugyi, (1999) “Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC
Transmission Systems”, Wiley-IEEE.
[2]. N. G. Hingorani, (1993) “Flexible AC Transmission”, IEEE Spectrum Vol. 30, pp. 40-45.
[3]. Y. H. Song & A. T. Johns, (1991) “Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS)”, IEEE Power and
Energy, The Institutions of Engineers Publication, Micheal Faraday House, United Kingdom, Vol. 30,
pp. 1-6.
[4]. E. Larsen & D. Torgerson, (1995) “FACTS Overview”, IEEE (PES) Power and Energy Series, pp. 95-
108.
[5]. D. Divan & H. Johal, (2007) “Distributed FACTS- A New Concept for Realizing Grid Power Flow
Control”, IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics, Vol. 22, 6-11.
[6]. R. K. Varma, (2009) “Introduction to FACTS Controllers”, Power Systems Conference and Exposition,
Seattle, USA, Vol. 9, pp. 1-6.
[7]. K. R. Padiyar, (1999) “Analysis of Subsynchronous Resonance in Power Systems”, kluwer Academic
Publishers.
[8]. T. F. Cigre, (1995) “Load Flow Control in High Voltage Systems Using FACTS Controllers”, Final
report.
[9]. L. Gyugyi, C. D. Schauder, K. K. Sen, (1997) “Static synchronous series Compensator: A solid -state
approach to the series compensation of transmission lines”, IEEE Transaction on Power delivery, Vol.
12, 406-417.
[10]. D. Divan, W. Brumsickle, R. Schneider, B. Kranz, R. Gascoigne, Ingram, D. M. Bradshaw, I. Grant,
(2007) “A distributed static series compensator system for realizing active power flow control on existing
power lines”, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, Vol. 22, No. 1, 642-649.
[11]. H. Johal & D. Divan, (2006) “Current Limiting Conductors: A Distributed Approach for Increasing T&D
System Capacity and Enhancing Reliability”, IEEE Press, Vol. 4, 1-7.
[12]. K. Porate, K. L. Thakre, G. L. Bodhe, (2009) “Distributed FACTS controllers As an Effective Tool for
Reduction in Environmental Pollution Due to Thermal Power Plant”, WSES Transaction, Vol. 4, No. 4,
85-94.
[13]. Alekhya Vaddiraj & Madhav Manjrekar, (2014) “Modelling and Analysis of an EPFC (enhanced Power
Flow Controller) with Conduction Angle Control”, IEEE PES General Meeting, University of North
Carolina – Charlotte, pp. 1-5.
[14]. Alekhya Vaddiraj & Madhav Manjrekar, (2014) “Dynamic analysis of an EPFC (enhanced Power Flow
Controller) with Conduction Angle Control”, IEEE PES General Meeting, University of North Carolina
– Charlotte, pp. 6-11.
[15]. S. K. Shrivastva, (2010) “Advanced Power Electronics Based FACTS Controllers: An Overview”, Asian
Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 4, 90-95.
[16]. B. Scott, (1974) “Review of load flow calculation methods”, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 62, No.7, pp. 916- 929.
[17]. X. P. Zhang & E. J. Handschin, (2001) “Optimal Power Flow Control by Converter based FACTS
Controllers”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on AC–DC Power Transaction, London,
U.K, pp. 28-30.
[18]. Juan Dixon, Luis Moran, Jose Rodriguez and Ricardo Domke, (2005) “Reactive power compensation
Technologies”, State of Art Review, Proceeding of the IEEE, Vol. 93, No. 12, pp. 2144-2164, Chile.
[19]. M. Noroozian & G. Andersson, (1993) “Power flow control by use of controllable series components”,
IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, Vol. 8, 1420-1429.
[20]. P. Kundur, (1994) “Power System Stability and Control”, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
[21]. A Report on Transmission Plan for Envisaged Renewable Capacity (2012), Power Grid Corporation of
India Ltd, Vol. 2, Accessed on 16th
June 2016.
[22]. D. G. Ramey, R. J. Nelson, J. Bian, T. A. Lemak, (1994) “Use of FACTS Power Flow Controllers to
Enhance Transmission Transfer Limits”, Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Vol. 1, pp.
712-718, USA.
[23]. D. Diwan, (2005) “Improving power line utilization and performance with D-FACTS devices”, Power
Engineering Society, Vol. 2, 2419-2424.

92 Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 84-92
[24]. J. J. Sanchez-Gasca, (1998) “Coordinated Control of two FACTS devices for Damping Inter-area
oscillations”, IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 428-434.
[25]. Tjing T. Lie & Wanhong Deng, (1997) “Optimal Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) Devices
Allocation”, Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 19, 125-134.
[26]. H. Johal & D. Divan, (2007) “Design Considerations for Series-Connected Distributed FACTS
Converters”, IEEE Transactionon Industrial Applications, Vol. 43, 1609-1618.
[27]. V. Kakkar & N. K. Agrawal, (2010) “Recent Trends on FACTS and D-FACTS”, Modern Electric Power
System Poland, pp. 1-8.
[28]. J. G. Singh, S. N. Singh, S. C. Srivastava, (2006) “Placement of FACTS Controllers for Enhancing
Power System Load ability”, IEEE Power India Conference, pp. 1-7, Hyderabad, India.
[29]. K. M. Rogers & T. J. Overbye, (2009) “Power flow control with distributed flexible AC transmission
system (D-FACTS) devices”, North American Power Symposium (NAPS), Vol. 10, University of Illinois
Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, pp. 1-6.
[30]. C. A. Canizares & Z. Faur, (1999) “Analysis of SVC and TCSC controllers in voltage collapse”, IEEE
Transaction on Power System, Vol. 14, 1-8.
[31]. D. M. Divan, W. Brumsickle and R. Schneider, (2006) “Distributed Floating Series Active impedance for
Power Transmission Systems”, US Patent application, Vol. 10, pp. 1-5.
[32]. M. Baby & R. Thilepa, (1998) “Power Flow Control In A Transmission Line By Using D-FACTS
Devices”, International Journal of Power Control Signal and Computation (IJPCSC), Vol. 2, 38-44.
[33]. D. Divan & H. Johal, (2006) “A Smarter grid for improving system reliability and asset utilization”,
IEEE-PEMC, Vol. 1, pp. 1-7, Shanghai, China.
[34]. Akhib Khan Bahamani, G.V. Siva Krishna Rao, A.A. Powly Thomas and V.C. Veera Reddy, (2013)
“Modelling and Digital Simulation of DPFC System using Mat lab Simulink”, International Journal of
Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE), Vol. 6, Issue 1, 1-5.
[35]. Viresh kumar, G. Mathad, Basangouda F. Ronad, Suresh H. Jangamshetti, (2013) “Review on
Comparison of FACTS Controllers for Power System Stability Enhancement”, International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 3, Issue 3, 1-4.
[36]. Ganesh Barve, (2014) “Application Study of FACTS Devices in Indian Power System”, International
Journal of Computing and Technology (IJCAT), Vol. 1, Issue 1, 57-59.
[37]. Sthitaprajana Rath, Bishnu Prasad Sahu, Prakash Das, (2012) “Power System Operation and Control
Using FACTS Devices”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 1,
Issue 5, 1-5.
[38]. Satvinder Singh, Nitin Goel, Pawan Kumar, (2013) “FACTS Technologies for the Development of
Future Transmission Systems”, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and
Development (2013), Vol. 2, Issue 3, 587-595.
AUTHOR PROFILE
Mahendra Lalwani is Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at
the Rajasthan Technical University, Kota. He has authored many books and research papers
in Power System, Power Electronics & Renewable Energy. He has been on editorial board
and reviewer of many journals. He also served on many program committees and conducted
conferences and workshops in the area. He is a Life Member ISTE, Member IE (India), Life
Member of Solar Energy Society of India, Member IEANG and Life Member of Society of
EMC Engineers.
Dheeraj Kumar Dhaked has completed his B.Tech from Rajasthan Technical University,
Kota. He is pursuing his M.Tech (Power System) from Rajasthan Technical University,
Kota, India. As an Electrical Engineer, his research interests include FACTS controller in
transmission system, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Neural Network and Fuzzy controller.

A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER (20)

More from DHEERAJ DHAKAR (16)

Recently uploaded (20)

A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER