SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The A3 method for the Introduction of Business Process Support Systems in Operational Practice Ilia Bider, IbisSoft & Stockholm  University  & Paul Johannesson, Stockholm  University with the help of Erik Perjons, Stockholm  University Prepared for BPM 2010:  http://www.bpm2010.org/
Introduction Introduction of a new BPS system in an organization is difficult Having a good system is no guarantee BPS system usually requires changes in the ways of working and communication between people. What to do when an introduction processes went not exactly according to the plan? A3-method was especially designed to answer this question as it can be applied at any point of an introduction process  A3 is a pragmatic approach. It came from practice, but has theoretical grounds Let's reinvent it !
Consider a situation A BPS system is installed in your organization The system is good enough for the intended purpose People do not use the system or only only partly use it We can restart the introduction process from the beginning What shall we do? 5 min brainstorming
Separate assessment of the situation from the history   How to  express  results   without   mentioning   history ?
Parameters Parameter – something that can be measured One (final) parameter is System use Can we suggest other parameters to assess a situation? 10 min brainstorming Parameter:  System use Parameter: Parameter: Parameter:
Our solution: parameters in A3 Organisational  culture Previous experiences of changes Alignment  system and  organisation Strategic  understanding WHY Tactical understanding WHEN Operational understanding HOW Attitude and motivation System use
Wh ich relations exist between the parameters? System use Brainstorming for 5  minutes Organisational culture Previous experiences of changes Alignment  system and  organisation Strategic understanding WHY Tactical understanding WHEN Operational understanding HOW Attitude and motivation
Parameter relations in A3
Brainstorming in  groups  for 15  minutes Each group shall develop questions for interviews/questionnaires measuring 1-2 parameters How to  measure  parameters?
Strategic understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: In your opinion, what is the purpose of the system?  (This question might have a fixed set of alternative answers listing possible purposes, or request an answer in natural language.) What do you gain from using the system when doing your tasks?  (Requires an answer in natural language) What does the organisation gain from the usage of the system?  (Requires an answer in natural language)
Tactical understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: In which of the following situations should you use the system?  (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers, where the alternatives consist of relevant as well as irrelevant situations. If alternative answers are to be provided, they need to be tailored to the specific organisation and system)  Do you know what information you should enter into the system in the work situations when you are supposed to use the system?  (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers) [ ] Yes [ ] Not always [ ] No
Operational understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: How often do you experience uncertainty about how to work in the system?   [ ] Always [ ] Often  [ ] Seldom [ ] Never How often do you ask for help with operating the system?  (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers) [ ] Often  [ ] Seldom [ ] Never
Alignment between system and organization Questions posed to the end user: Are the terms used in the system the same as those used in the business?  [ ] Yes, most of the terms in the system are used in the business [ ] No, several terms used in the system differ from those used in the  business [ ] No, most terms used in the system differ from those used in the  business When the system requires you to categorise or to make a choice, are the alternatives provided understandable and relevant for your task?   [ ] Yes, always [ ] Yes, often [ ] No, seldom [ ] No, never
Alignment between system and organization Questions posed to the end user: When you use the system do you find all the information that you need for you specific tasks that is supposed to be inputted by others?  [ ] Yes [ ] Yes, to some extent [ ] No
Previous   experience   of changes For each previous reorganisation/IT introduction, the following questions (which all require answers in natural language) are  to be posed to end-users  who were affected by the reorganisation/IT introduction: What was the purpose behind the reorganisation/ the introduction of the IT system?  What were the results of the reorganisation/ introduction, specifically: –  were the desired results attained? –  what were the positive consequences? –  what were the negative  consequences?  
Organizational Culture A question to be posed to  management :  Are your subordinates used to being ordered to carry out tasks without being informed about their reason?   [ ] Yes, most orders to subordinates are given without explanations [ ] Yes, some orders to subordinates are given without explanations [ ] No A question to be posed to  end-users : Are you used to receiving orders to carry out tasks without being informed about their reason? [ ] Yes, most orders are given without explanations [ ] Yes, some orders are given without explanations [ ] No  
System use Questions to be posed to end-users are:  How often do you use the system?   [ ] Every day [ ] Three days a week or more [ ] One or two days a week [ ] Less than one day a week For which of the following tasks do you use the system? (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers, where the alternatives consist of relevant as well as irrelevant tasks. These alternatives need to be tailored to the specific organisation and system)  
Attitude and motivation Questions to be posed to end-users: Would you use the system if nobody in management demand that you use it?   [ ] Yes  [ ] Yes if others use it  [ ] No If the answer is yes there is no need to investigate the parameter further.
Individual reactions Performance expectancy.  Performance expectancy means: “the degree to which an individual believes that using the system will help him or her to attain gains in job performance” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).   Effort expectancy. Effort expectancy means: “the degree of ease associated with the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Social influence.   Social influence means: “the degree to which an individual perceives that ‘important others’ believe he or she should use the new system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).  Facilitated conditions . Facilitated conditions means: “the degree to which individual believes that an organisational and technical infrastructure exists to support the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).
How  to   change the values of  parameters? Brainstorming for 5  minutes
Categories of   means  of  control
Which means  of   control ? Brainstorming in groups for 15  minutes. Each group develops means of control for 1-2 parameters
The A3 model
The A3 method
Practical background Real life case  Type of organisation Type of system Type of problems
Type of organization Non-for-profit (interest) organization Association of tenants in West region of Sweden Central office – about 60-70 employees  Democratic type (achieve concensus) with a strong CEO
Type of  system – BPS system based on the collaborative planning Structure of the process case/instance
Type of system - continuing Plans for a particular user
Type of problems General – 'It might be a good system, but I do not understand what shall I use it for?' Collaborative planning – not intuitive New processes  (customer feedback) Previously totally ad-hoc processes (lobbying)
Theoretical background State-oriented view of business processes Kotter’s [1996]  eight   stages  for  change  management Sharma and Yetton [2003] Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology  (U TAUT)
State-oriented view on  business processes For each item  Ordered = Delivered To pay = Total + Freight + Tax Ordered  >  Delivered  shipment  To pay  >  Invoiced   invoicing   Invoiced = To pay Paid = Invoiced
Kotter’s  eight   stages  for  change  management 1. Esta-bilishing a sence of urgency 2.  Crea-ting the guiding coali-tion 3. Devel-oping a vision and strategy 4.  Com-munica-ting a vision and strategy 5. Em- powering broad-based action 6. Gen-erating short-term wins 7. Consoli-dating gains and producing more change 8. Anchor-ing new approach-es in the culture Kotter’s eight staged for change management: A3 model:
Sharma and Yetton  A3 model: Sharma and Yetton: 1.  Instituting new structures 2. Instituting new performance control systems 3. Instituting new coordination mechanisms 4. Instituting changes to performance goals
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Two types of individual reactions influencing the use of system: -  perceived usefulness , defined “as the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance”, and  -  perceived easy-of-use , defined as “the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free from effort” A3 model:
U TAUT – an extended TAM Four types of individual reactions influencing the use of system: Performance expectancy.   Performance expectancy means: “the degree to which an individual believes that using the system will help him or her to attain gains in job performance” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).   Effort expectancy.  Effort expectancy means: “the degree of ease associated with the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Social influence .   Social influence means: “the degree to which an individual perceives that ‘important others’ believe he or she should use the new system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).  Facilitated conditions .  Facilitated conditions means: “the degree to which individual believes that an organisational and technical infrastructure exists to support the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). A3 model:
Thank  you for your  attention ! Corresponding author: Ilia Bider ,  IbisSoft www.ibissoft.se/en Email: ilia@ibissoft.se Additional resources: http://processplatsen.ibissoft.se/en/node/27

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

PPSX
System Analysis & Design - I
Gagan Deep
 
PDF
Sad
learnt
 
PPTX
System Analysis & Designing : Elements of a System [In short]
Abir Maheshwari
 
PPTX
System Analysis and Design
Joel Briza
 
DOC
System analysis and_design
Tushar Rajput
 
PPTX
System analysis and design Part2
Joel Briza
 
PPTX
Lecture # 08 (developing business it solution)
Dynamic Research Centre & institute
 
PDF
A&D - Introduction to Analysis & Design of Information System
vinay arora
 
PDF
Systems Analysis and Design 8th Edition Kendall Solutions Manual
KadenCohen
 
PPTX
System Analysis and Design
Yohan Gunathilaka
 
PPTX
Lesson 1 System Analysis and Design
perly pantojan
 
PPT
St josephs project management
David Terry
 
PPTX
CIS 2303: System Planning Part 1
Ahmad Ammari
 
PPTX
System Analysis and Design
Zakaria Hossain
 
PPTX
System analysis ITM3(1).pptx
Aram Mohammed
 
PPT
SAD Chapter1
ilysantiano
 
PDF
System analysis and design Class 2
Dr. Mazin Mohamed alkathiri
 
PPTX
Sad
pooja_doshi
 
PPTX
System analysis design
Naveen PV
 
PPTX
SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Assignment help
john mayer
 
System Analysis & Design - I
Gagan Deep
 
Sad
learnt
 
System Analysis & Designing : Elements of a System [In short]
Abir Maheshwari
 
System Analysis and Design
Joel Briza
 
System analysis and_design
Tushar Rajput
 
System analysis and design Part2
Joel Briza
 
Lecture # 08 (developing business it solution)
Dynamic Research Centre & institute
 
A&D - Introduction to Analysis & Design of Information System
vinay arora
 
Systems Analysis and Design 8th Edition Kendall Solutions Manual
KadenCohen
 
System Analysis and Design
Yohan Gunathilaka
 
Lesson 1 System Analysis and Design
perly pantojan
 
St josephs project management
David Terry
 
CIS 2303: System Planning Part 1
Ahmad Ammari
 
System Analysis and Design
Zakaria Hossain
 
System analysis ITM3(1).pptx
Aram Mohammed
 
SAD Chapter1
ilysantiano
 
System analysis and design Class 2
Dr. Mazin Mohamed alkathiri
 
System analysis design
Naveen PV
 
SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Assignment help
john mayer
 

Similar to A3 Tutorial Slides (20)

PPTX
Chap3 RE elicitation
Ian Sommerville
 
PPT
Ais 150715071434-lva1-app6891
Bandri Nikhil
 
PPT
Hsc project management
greg robertson
 
PPTX
SDLC
nethisip13
 
DOCX
Running Head DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM PLAN 1DECISION SUPPORT.docx
susanschei
 
PPTX
Feasible
learnt
 
PDF
Ms 04
John Kioko
 
PPTX
Hsc project management 2015
greg robertson
 
DOC
TRADITIONAL DESIGN METHOD
Dr. Solomon Esomu
 
PPTX
System Development Life Cycle(SDLC)
mambopoa
 
DOCX
Feasibility of a project
Bikramjit Singh
 
PPTX
L2 Socio Tech Systems
Ian Sommerville
 
PPT
pertemuan 1.ppt
lumaeducation
 
PPT
Systems_Overview.ppt
DarkNight33350
 
PDF
SDLC slides 1.pdf
Muhammad Huraira
 
PPT
Systems_Overview.ppt
Miftahululumsarolang
 
PPT
SCD2_Systems_Overview.ppt
azeem46gf
 
PPT
Systems_Overview.ppt
ssuser1facb81
 
PPT
Commissioning And Procurement
alecfraher
 
Chap3 RE elicitation
Ian Sommerville
 
Ais 150715071434-lva1-app6891
Bandri Nikhil
 
Hsc project management
greg robertson
 
Running Head DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM PLAN 1DECISION SUPPORT.docx
susanschei
 
Feasible
learnt
 
Ms 04
John Kioko
 
Hsc project management 2015
greg robertson
 
TRADITIONAL DESIGN METHOD
Dr. Solomon Esomu
 
System Development Life Cycle(SDLC)
mambopoa
 
Feasibility of a project
Bikramjit Singh
 
L2 Socio Tech Systems
Ian Sommerville
 
pertemuan 1.ppt
lumaeducation
 
Systems_Overview.ppt
DarkNight33350
 
SDLC slides 1.pdf
Muhammad Huraira
 
Systems_Overview.ppt
Miftahululumsarolang
 
SCD2_Systems_Overview.ppt
azeem46gf
 
Systems_Overview.ppt
ssuser1facb81
 
Commissioning And Procurement
alecfraher
 
Ad

More from Ilia Bider (20)

PPTX
Can an Enterprise Model Help in Mapping Capabilities?
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
On the Concept of Discovery Power of Enterprise Modeling Languages and its Re...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
ICEIS tutorial 2019: BUSINESS PROCESS CANVAS AND ITS USAGE IN IS TEACHING AND...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Linking Autopoiesis to Homeostasis in Socio-Technical Systems
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Value delivered - is it the same or different?
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Defining Transformational Patterns for Business Model Innovation
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using Fractal Enterprise Model to Assist Complexity Management
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using a Socio-Technical Systems Approach for a Sales Process Improvement
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Business Process Canvas and its Usage in IS Teaching and Learning
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Research-Oriented Practical Problem Solving as a Learning Goal for Thesis Cou...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using the Structure of Tacit Knowing for Acquiring a Holistic View on IS Field
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Fractal Enterpise Model (FEM) - a tutorial
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Business Process Canvas as a Process Model in a Nutshell http://bit.ly/2NseOFu
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using Structural Coupling Approach for Defining and Maintaining Identity of a...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using the Process-Assets Framework for Creating a Holistic View over Process ...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Using a Fractal Enterprise Model for Business Model Innovation
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Is People-Structure-Tasks-Technology Matrix Outdated?
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Stray lamb - misalignment in a socio-technical structure of an enterprise whe...
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
YASQLT – Yet Another SQL Tutor. A Pragmatic Approach
Ilia Bider
 
PPTX
Becoming Agile in a Non-Disruptive Way: Is it Possible?
Ilia Bider
 
Can an Enterprise Model Help in Mapping Capabilities?
Ilia Bider
 
On the Concept of Discovery Power of Enterprise Modeling Languages and its Re...
Ilia Bider
 
ICEIS tutorial 2019: BUSINESS PROCESS CANVAS AND ITS USAGE IN IS TEACHING AND...
Ilia Bider
 
Linking Autopoiesis to Homeostasis in Socio-Technical Systems
Ilia Bider
 
Value delivered - is it the same or different?
Ilia Bider
 
Defining Transformational Patterns for Business Model Innovation
Ilia Bider
 
Using Fractal Enterprise Model to Assist Complexity Management
Ilia Bider
 
Using a Socio-Technical Systems Approach for a Sales Process Improvement
Ilia Bider
 
Business Process Canvas and its Usage in IS Teaching and Learning
Ilia Bider
 
Research-Oriented Practical Problem Solving as a Learning Goal for Thesis Cou...
Ilia Bider
 
Using the Structure of Tacit Knowing for Acquiring a Holistic View on IS Field
Ilia Bider
 
Fractal Enterpise Model (FEM) - a tutorial
Ilia Bider
 
Business Process Canvas as a Process Model in a Nutshell http://bit.ly/2NseOFu
Ilia Bider
 
Using Structural Coupling Approach for Defining and Maintaining Identity of a...
Ilia Bider
 
Using the Process-Assets Framework for Creating a Holistic View over Process ...
Ilia Bider
 
Using a Fractal Enterprise Model for Business Model Innovation
Ilia Bider
 
Is People-Structure-Tasks-Technology Matrix Outdated?
Ilia Bider
 
Stray lamb - misalignment in a socio-technical structure of an enterprise whe...
Ilia Bider
 
YASQLT – Yet Another SQL Tutor. A Pragmatic Approach
Ilia Bider
 
Becoming Agile in a Non-Disruptive Way: Is it Possible?
Ilia Bider
 
Ad

A3 Tutorial Slides

  • 1. The A3 method for the Introduction of Business Process Support Systems in Operational Practice Ilia Bider, IbisSoft & Stockholm University & Paul Johannesson, Stockholm University with the help of Erik Perjons, Stockholm University Prepared for BPM 2010: http://www.bpm2010.org/
  • 2. Introduction Introduction of a new BPS system in an organization is difficult Having a good system is no guarantee BPS system usually requires changes in the ways of working and communication between people. What to do when an introduction processes went not exactly according to the plan? A3-method was especially designed to answer this question as it can be applied at any point of an introduction process A3 is a pragmatic approach. It came from practice, but has theoretical grounds Let's reinvent it !
  • 3. Consider a situation A BPS system is installed in your organization The system is good enough for the intended purpose People do not use the system or only only partly use it We can restart the introduction process from the beginning What shall we do? 5 min brainstorming
  • 4. Separate assessment of the situation from the history How to express results without mentioning history ?
  • 5. Parameters Parameter – something that can be measured One (final) parameter is System use Can we suggest other parameters to assess a situation? 10 min brainstorming Parameter: System use Parameter: Parameter: Parameter:
  • 6. Our solution: parameters in A3 Organisational culture Previous experiences of changes Alignment system and organisation Strategic understanding WHY Tactical understanding WHEN Operational understanding HOW Attitude and motivation System use
  • 7. Wh ich relations exist between the parameters? System use Brainstorming for 5 minutes Organisational culture Previous experiences of changes Alignment system and organisation Strategic understanding WHY Tactical understanding WHEN Operational understanding HOW Attitude and motivation
  • 9. Brainstorming in groups for 15 minutes Each group shall develop questions for interviews/questionnaires measuring 1-2 parameters How to measure parameters?
  • 10. Strategic understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: In your opinion, what is the purpose of the system? (This question might have a fixed set of alternative answers listing possible purposes, or request an answer in natural language.) What do you gain from using the system when doing your tasks? (Requires an answer in natural language) What does the organisation gain from the usage of the system? (Requires an answer in natural language)
  • 11. Tactical understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: In which of the following situations should you use the system? (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers, where the alternatives consist of relevant as well as irrelevant situations. If alternative answers are to be provided, they need to be tailored to the specific organisation and system) Do you know what information you should enter into the system in the work situations when you are supposed to use the system? (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers) [ ] Yes [ ] Not always [ ] No
  • 12. Operational understanding Questions to be posed to the end user: How often do you experience uncertainty about how to work in the system? [ ] Always [ ] Often [ ] Seldom [ ] Never How often do you ask for help with operating the system? (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers) [ ] Often [ ] Seldom [ ] Never
  • 13. Alignment between system and organization Questions posed to the end user: Are the terms used in the system the same as those used in the business? [ ] Yes, most of the terms in the system are used in the business [ ] No, several terms used in the system differ from those used in the business [ ] No, most terms used in the system differ from those used in the business When the system requires you to categorise or to make a choice, are the alternatives provided understandable and relevant for your task? [ ] Yes, always [ ] Yes, often [ ] No, seldom [ ] No, never
  • 14. Alignment between system and organization Questions posed to the end user: When you use the system do you find all the information that you need for you specific tasks that is supposed to be inputted by others? [ ] Yes [ ] Yes, to some extent [ ] No
  • 15. Previous experience of changes For each previous reorganisation/IT introduction, the following questions (which all require answers in natural language) are to be posed to end-users who were affected by the reorganisation/IT introduction: What was the purpose behind the reorganisation/ the introduction of the IT system? What were the results of the reorganisation/ introduction, specifically: – were the desired results attained? – what were the positive consequences? – what were the negative consequences?  
  • 16. Organizational Culture A question to be posed to management : Are your subordinates used to being ordered to carry out tasks without being informed about their reason? [ ] Yes, most orders to subordinates are given without explanations [ ] Yes, some orders to subordinates are given without explanations [ ] No A question to be posed to end-users : Are you used to receiving orders to carry out tasks without being informed about their reason? [ ] Yes, most orders are given without explanations [ ] Yes, some orders are given without explanations [ ] No  
  • 17. System use Questions to be posed to end-users are: How often do you use the system? [ ] Every day [ ] Three days a week or more [ ] One or two days a week [ ] Less than one day a week For which of the following tasks do you use the system? (Question with a fixed set of alternative answers, where the alternatives consist of relevant as well as irrelevant tasks. These alternatives need to be tailored to the specific organisation and system)  
  • 18. Attitude and motivation Questions to be posed to end-users: Would you use the system if nobody in management demand that you use it? [ ] Yes [ ] Yes if others use it [ ] No If the answer is yes there is no need to investigate the parameter further.
  • 19. Individual reactions Performance expectancy. Performance expectancy means: “the degree to which an individual believes that using the system will help him or her to attain gains in job performance” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).  Effort expectancy. Effort expectancy means: “the degree of ease associated with the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Social influence.   Social influence means: “the degree to which an individual perceives that ‘important others’ believe he or she should use the new system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Facilitated conditions . Facilitated conditions means: “the degree to which individual believes that an organisational and technical infrastructure exists to support the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).
  • 20. How to change the values of parameters? Brainstorming for 5 minutes
  • 21. Categories of means of control
  • 22. Which means of control ? Brainstorming in groups for 15 minutes. Each group develops means of control for 1-2 parameters
  • 25. Practical background Real life case Type of organisation Type of system Type of problems
  • 26. Type of organization Non-for-profit (interest) organization Association of tenants in West region of Sweden Central office – about 60-70 employees Democratic type (achieve concensus) with a strong CEO
  • 27. Type of system – BPS system based on the collaborative planning Structure of the process case/instance
  • 28. Type of system - continuing Plans for a particular user
  • 29. Type of problems General – 'It might be a good system, but I do not understand what shall I use it for?' Collaborative planning – not intuitive New processes (customer feedback) Previously totally ad-hoc processes (lobbying)
  • 30. Theoretical background State-oriented view of business processes Kotter’s [1996] eight stages for change management Sharma and Yetton [2003] Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (U TAUT)
  • 31. State-oriented view on business processes For each item Ordered = Delivered To pay = Total + Freight + Tax Ordered > Delivered shipment To pay > Invoiced invoicing Invoiced = To pay Paid = Invoiced
  • 32. Kotter’s eight stages for change management 1. Esta-bilishing a sence of urgency 2. Crea-ting the guiding coali-tion 3. Devel-oping a vision and strategy 4. Com-munica-ting a vision and strategy 5. Em- powering broad-based action 6. Gen-erating short-term wins 7. Consoli-dating gains and producing more change 8. Anchor-ing new approach-es in the culture Kotter’s eight staged for change management: A3 model:
  • 33. Sharma and Yetton A3 model: Sharma and Yetton: 1. Instituting new structures 2. Instituting new performance control systems 3. Instituting new coordination mechanisms 4. Instituting changes to performance goals
  • 34. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Two types of individual reactions influencing the use of system: - perceived usefulness , defined “as the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance”, and - perceived easy-of-use , defined as “the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free from effort” A3 model:
  • 35. U TAUT – an extended TAM Four types of individual reactions influencing the use of system: Performance expectancy. Performance expectancy means: “the degree to which an individual believes that using the system will help him or her to attain gains in job performance” (Venkatesh et al., 2003).  Effort expectancy. Effort expectancy means: “the degree of ease associated with the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Social influence .   Social influence means: “the degree to which an individual perceives that ‘important others’ believe he or she should use the new system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Facilitated conditions . Facilitated conditions means: “the degree to which individual believes that an organisational and technical infrastructure exists to support the use of the system” (Venkatesh et al., 2003). A3 model:
  • 36. Thank you for your attention ! Corresponding author: Ilia Bider , IbisSoft www.ibissoft.se/en Email: [email protected] Additional resources: http://processplatsen.ibissoft.se/en/node/27