Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to Adjacent Implants soft & hard tissue Augmentation.pptx
![NEW dental implant design [Autosaved].pptx](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/newimplantdesignautosaved-250614065418-013f8c1f-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
More from MostafaElGendy37
Adjacent Implants soft & hard tissue Augmentation.pptx
- 1. Adjacent Implants soft andhard tissue augmentation Supervised by: • Prof.Dr. Mohamed Mostafa Presented by: • Mostafa Mohamed Rabie • Raeaa Elsadeq
- 2. Content: 1. Introduction 2. BiologicalConsiderations 3. Soft Tissue Problems 4. Soft Tissue Augmentation Techniques 5. Importance of Bone Augmentation 6. Bone Augmentation Techniques 7. Key Factors Affecting Esthetic Outcome 8. Strategies for Inter-implant Papilla Reconstruction 9. Clinical Workflow 10.Conclusion
- 3. Introduction Adjacent implants referto the strategic placement of two or more dental implants in close proximity within the same edentulous (toothless) span of the jaw. Their increasing prevalence reflects advancements in implantology and patient demand for comprehensive oral rehabilitation. While single-implant restorations have high predictability, adjacent implants introduce complexities because of the shared biological environment, demanding precise planning to mimic natural dentition
- 4. Healthy bacteria supportgum health; unhealthy bacteria cause bone loss. Biological Challenges • Marginal bone loss: A critical aesthetic and functional concern. • Inter-implant papilla regeneration: Predictability remains challenging. • Soft tissue integration: Crucial for long-term peri-implant health. • Biological width considerations: Impacting restorative space and stability.
- 5. Reduced inter-implant papilla The softtissue between implants often fails to regenerate adequately due to limited blood supply and bone support, leading to "black triangles" – esthetic defects that expose dark spaces between teeth, particularly noticeable in the smile line.
- 7. Esthetic Instability Anterior zoneimplants present significant esthetic challenges, demanding precise soft and hard tissue integration. Insufficient bone or gingiva leads to compromised emergence profiles and visible implant components. Augmentation is crucial for achieving natural contours and ensuring high patient satisfaction with the final prosthetic outcome.
- 9. Peri-Implant Biology Unlike naturalteeth, dental implants lack a periodontal ligament, resulting in a direct bone-to- implant interface. This anatomical distinction renders peri-implant tissues more susceptible to bacterial challenges and accelerated bone loss, necessitating meticulous maintenance protocols.
- 11. Inter-Implant Distance • 3mmspacing is crucial. • Preserves interproximal bone, papilla. • Maintains adequate blood supply (vascularization). • Prevents bone resorption, esthetic complications.
- 12. Preoperative Assessment &Outcomes Considering the critical role of biotype evaluation and advanced 3D imaging in adjacent implant cases, how do these diagnostic tools collectively inform treatment planning to proactively mitigate risks and significantly optimize long-term esthetic and functional outcomes for patients?
- 13. Biological Considerations for AdjacentImplant Placement The biology of peri-implant tissues differs from natural teeth, with implants lacking a periodontal ligament, leading to direct bone-implant contact (osseointegration) but increased vulnerability to resorption. Key principles guide placement to optimize healing and esthetics.
- 14. Inter-implant distance • Theideal distance between adjacent implants is at least 3 mm to preserve the inter-implant bone crest and allows for adequate vascularization and prevents horizontal bone loss. • Distances less than 3 mm trigger resorption of the inter- implant bone crest with papilla loss. • In practice, a minimum of 3 mm is recommended, but some protocols suggest 4 mm in thin biotypes for added safety.
- 15. Implant–tooth distance • Theoptimal distance from an implant to an adjacent natural tooth is 1.5–2 mm to avoid pressure on the periodontal ligament and prevent bone loss around the tooth root. • Violations of this can cause root resorption or interproximal bone defects, with research showing increased risks in the anterior mandible where space is limited.
- 17. Platform switching This designfeature uses an abutment diameter smaller than the implant platform, shifting the implant-abutment junction inward. It minimizes bacterial infiltration and inflammatory cell infiltrate, reducing crestal bone loss by 0.5-1 mm compared to non-switched platforms. Platform switching preserves the interproximal bone peak, enhancing papilla support. Long-term studies confirm its role in maintaining bone height, particularly in esthetic zones.
- 19. Emergence profile The emergenceprofile is the transitional contour from the implant platform through the soft tissue to the restoration. In adjacent implants, it must be customized to guide tissue adaptation, promoting convex contours for papilla formation. Poor profiles lead to tissue collapse; provisional restorations are used to "train" the tissue over 3-6 months, with digital workflows aiding precision.
- 21. Additional biological factorsinclude gingival biotype (thick >2 mm resists recession better than thin <2 mm) and implant surface characteristics (e.g., hydrophilic surfaces enhance early healing). The "3x3x3 PIE" rule (Prosthetically driven Implant Esthetics) emphasizes 3 mm apically, 3 mm buccally, and 3 mm inter-implant for optimal outcomes.
- 22. SOFT TISSUE PROCEDURESAROUND IMPLANTS | Pocket Dentistry
- 23. Soft Tissue ProblemsCommon in Adjacent Implant Cases Soft tissue deficiencies arise from extraction trauma, thin biotypes, or improper placement, exacerbating esthetic and functional issues:
- 24. Loss of inter-implantpapilla Caused by inadequate bone support or spacing <3 mm, resulting in black triangles. Prevalence is high (up to 60% in anterior cases without augmentation), leading to food impaction and speech issues.
- 25. Predisposes to recessiondue to poor vascularity and collagen content, exposing implant threads and increasing peri-implantitis risk. Thin periodontal phenotype (<2 mm)
- 26. Mid-facial recession, especiallyin the esthetic zone Often from buccal implant positioning or flap elevation trauma, causing up to 1-2 mm loss within the first year, compromising smile harmony.
- 27. Lack of keratinizedmucosa Width <2 mm hinders plaque control, promoting inflammation and instability. Studies link this to higher bleeding scores and bone loss over time.
- 28. These problems canbe assessed via probing, CBCT, and phenotype mapping, with early intervention critical for
- 29. Indications: Soft TissueAugmentation Esthetic Demands Achieve optimal gingival contours, symmetry, and papilla presence, crucial for a natural-looking emergence profile. Prevents "black triangles" between crowns. Functional & Biological Stability Enhance tissue thickness for improved plaque control and reduce recession risk. Supports long-term implant health and prevents peri- implantitis.
- 30. Thin Biotype Management Athin gingival biotype significantly elevates the risk of implant-related soft tissue recession. Prophylactic soft tissue augmentation is crucial to enhance tissue stability and ensure long-term aesthetic and functional success. This intervention prevents future complications.
- 31. Papilla Loss &Black Triangles • Esthetic challenge: inter- implant papilla deficiency. • Creates "black triangles" due to open embrasures. • Indicates insufficient soft tissue volume. • Requires soft tissue augmentation intervention.
- 32.
- 33. Soft tissue augmentationaims to increase volume, thickness, and keratinization. Techniques are selected based on defect severity, site, and patient factors. Success rates generally exceed 85%, but vary by method.
- 34. Connective Tissue Graft Aconnective tissue graft (CTG) enhances soft tissue volume and achieves root coverage around implants. This procedure improves esthetics, provides biological sealing, and minimizes recession. It is crucial for long-term implant success and peri- implant health.
- 35. oDescription: Harvested fromthe palate, de-epithelialized, and placed subgingivally via envelope or tunnel incision. oAdvantages: Gold standard for thickness gain (1-2 mm), enhances papilla and emergence profile, low resorption. oDisadvantages: Donor morbidity (pain, bleeding), technique-sensitive. oEvidence: Superior for esthetics in maxillary zones; trouser-shaped variant minimizes invasion and augments peri-implant tissue effectively. Compared to xenogenic substitutes, CTG shows better long-term stability.
- 36. Free Gingival Graft Technique Overview Adonor site (e.g., palate) provides epithelium and connective tissue. This graft is then sutured to the recipient site to augment keratinized mucosa. Key Applications for Implants Used to increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants, crucial for long-term peri-implant health and plaque control. Clinical Considerations Ensures stable soft tissue contour, improves hygiene access, and reduces inflammation. Predictability depends on recipient site vascularity.
- 37. oDescription: Full-thickness epithelial-connectivegraft from palate, placed on recipient bed. oAdvantages: Increases keratinized width (2-4 mm gain), durable in non-esthetic areas like mandible. oDisadvantages: Color mismatch, higher shrinkage (20-40%). oEvidence: Effective for mandibular anterior; timing impacts outcomes, with pre-implant grafting preferred.
- 38. Laterally Rotated Flap The laterallyrotated flap is a localized pedicle flap technique for augmenting soft tissue defects immediately adjacent to dental implants. It utilizes a donor site lateral to the defect, providing vascularized tissue for improved esthetics and peri- implant health. This approach minimizes donor site morbidity.
- 39. Tunnel flap oDescription: Minimallyinvasive; create subepithelial tunnel with specialized instruments, insert graft (CTG or matrix), and secure. oAdvantages: Preserves blood supply, reduces scarring, ideal for multiple sites. oDisadvantages: Requires skill, limited for severe defects. oEvidence: Stable keratinized mucosa over 5 years; useful for papilla augmentation.
- 41. Allogeneic/Xenogeneic Grafts Allogeneic Grafts Allogeneicgrafts (allografts) are derived from human donors. They undergo processing to remove cellular components, minimizing immune rejection. Examples include acellular dermal matrices (ADM). These grafts effectively augment soft tissue, avoiding autogenous donor site morbidity. Xenogeneic Grafts Xenogeneic grafts (xenografts) originate from non-human animal sources, typically porcine or bovine. Rigorous processing ensures biocompatibility and safety. They provide a structural scaffold for tissue regeneration. Xenografts also eliminate the need for a separate surgical site on the patient.
- 42. oDescription: Porcine-derived (e.g.,Mucograft, Fibro-Gide) placed similarly to CTG, resorb and integrate. oAdvantages: No donor site, less morbidity, predictable for moderate defects. oDisadvantages: Less volume gain than autogenous, potential inflammation. oEvidence: Comparable to CTG for thickness in thin biotypes, reducing patient discomfort
- 43. Pedicle Grafts • Maintainsblood supply from donor site. • Roll flap: Increases soft tissue thickness. • Rotational flap: Covers adjacent defects. • Ideal for localized soft tissue augmentation.
- 44. Technique Thickness Gain Keratinization Increase MorbiditySuccess Rate CTG High (1-2 mm) Moderate High 90-95% FGG Moderate High (2-4 mm) High 85-90% Tunnel Moderate Moderate Low 88-92% Matrices Moderate Moderate Low 80-90%
- 45. Growth Factors inSoft Tissue Augmentation Other Biologics for Regeneration Growth factors like PDGF and BMPs stimulate cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. They enhance angiogenesis and collagen synthesis, crucial for accelerating soft tissue healing and integration around implants. This minimizes complications and improves aesthetic outcomes. Other biologics include PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) and PRF (Platelet-Rich Fibrin). These autologous concentrates deliver growth factors directly to the surgical site. They promote faster wound healing, reduce inflammation, and enhance tissue regeneration post- implantation, improving long- term success.
- 46.
- 47. Bone cell anatomy:osteogenic, osteoblast, osteocyte, and osteoclast. Hard Tissue Augmentation: Overview • Bone Augmentation: Rebuilding deficient alveolar ridge. • Essential for adequate implant support. • Prevents implant failure due to insufficient bone. • Various techniques: GBR, block grafts.
- 48. Bone Grafting inImplant Dentistry •Utilizing bone graft materials to support healing in bone defects or to build up edentulous ridges for dental implant placement is now a widely accepted standard practice.
- 49. Defect Classification Basedon Alveolar Bone Crest •Type I: Loss of the alveolar ridge width without any loss in height, resulting in a narrow ridge but maintaining the original vertical dimension. •Type II: Vertical loss of the alveolar ridge height with preserved ridge width, leading to a shortened ridge height but normal width. •Type III: Combination of both horizontal and vertical loss, where the alveolar ridge is reduced in both height and width, presenting the most complex defect.
- 51. Essential Steps forSuccessful Bone Augmentation •Designing the incision and managing the flap effectively •Preparing the site to encourage new blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) •Ensuring the space is properly maintained •Securing the graft to prevent movement •Achieving a tension-free, primary closure of the wound
- 52. Indications: Hard TissueAugmentaion Alveolar Ridge Deficiency Insufficient bone height or width post-extraction compromises implant stability. Augmentation restores adequate dimensions for successful osseointegration and prosthetic support. Resorbed Maxilla/Mandible Severe bone loss due to atrophy, trauma, or disease requires significant reconstruction. This ensures proper implant placement and long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.
- 53. Techniques for RidgeAugmentation
- 54. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Alveolarridge preservation (ARP) minimizes post-extraction bone resorption, maintaining ridge volume for optimal implant placement. This technique involves immediate socket grafting with biomaterials, crucial for preserving hard and soft tissue architecture.
- 55. Bone Healing inNewly Extracted Tooth Sockets Protocols involving immediate and early implant placement
- 56. Ridge Split Technique: Usedin the maxilla to widen bone by splitting and pushing the buccal plate outward for implant placement. Indication: For horizontal bone loss needing 2-5 mm of widening.
- 57. Vertical Ridge Augmentation •GuidedBone Regeneration •Onlay Bone Grafting •Distraction Osteogenesis
- 58. Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) GBRPrinciples GBR leverages selective cell proliferation for bone regeneration. It excludes undesirable soft tissue cells, allowing osteogenic cells to colonize and form new bone in a protected space. Barrier Membranes Membranes create a physical barrier preventing soft tissue ingrowth, maintaining space for bone formation. They can be resorbable (e.g., collagen) or non-resorbable (e.g., PTFE). Graft Materials & Clinical Use Autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts provide osteoconductive scaffolds and/or osteoinductive signals. They augment bone volume and stabilize membranes.
- 59.
- 60. Material selection shouldalign with the specific clinical needs:
- 61. Autogenous Bone Grafts:The Gold Standard Osteogenic Potential Osteoinductive Properties Osteoconductive Scaffold
- 62. Autogenous Bone Grafts Advantages:The Gold Standard Autogenous bone is the gold standard due to its osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties. It contains viable osteoblasts and growth factors, ensuring superior integration and minimal immunogenicity. This leads to predictable outcomes in augmentation procedures. Limitations: Clinical Considerations Despite its benefits, autogenous grafting involves donor site morbidity, increasing surgical complexity and patient discomfort. Limited bone volume at donor sites and potential for graft resorption are also significant clinical challenges. These factors necessitate careful patient selection and planning.
- 63. Allografts Allografts (cadaveric bone)are crucial bone graft materials. Processing, including freeze-drying and demineralization, mitigates immunogenicity and disease transmission. Their osteoconductive and sometimes osteoinductive properties make them valuable for augmenting bone volume.
- 64. Xenografts • Biocompatible graftfrom different species (e.g., bovine). • Undergo extensive processing to remove organic components. • Primarily provide an osteoconductive scaffold. • Supports new bone formation during augmentation.
- 65. Alloplasts: Synthetic Graft Materials Alloplastsare synthetic, biocompatible materials used for bone augmentation. Examples include hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), often combined. They provide a scaffold for new bone formation, crucial in implant dentistry for ridge preservation and sinus lifts. Their predictable resorption rates are advantageous.
- 66. Barrier Membranes Barrier membranesare crucial for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR), containing graft materials and promoting osteogenesis by excluding soft tissue infiltration.
- 68. Synergistic Approach EnhancedOutcomes Combined soft and hard tissue augmentation is crucial for achieving predictable, long-term implant success. It addresses both functional stability and aesthetic integration. This holistic approach ensures adequate bone volume and optimal soft tissue contours around the implant. Such synergy prevents complications like peri-implantitis and recession, enhancing prosthetic longevity. Integrating techniques like Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) with connective tissue grafts yields superior results. This strategy establishes a robust biological foundation, promoting natural-looking emergence profiles. It mitigates future soft tissue defects and supports papilla formation. Ultimately, this approach optimizes both biological and esthetic outcomes for the patient.
- 69. Emerging Technologies Growth Factors •Bonevolume growth factors like PDGF and BMPs have advanced. Cell Therapy • Cells help regenerate edentulous ridges by: Delivering growth signals & Differentiating into various cell types Scaffolding Matrices •Provide space and support for cell growth and tissue formation. Computer Applications •Used in scaffold design and fabrication.
- 70. Timing Hard TissueProcedures Simultaneous Augmentation Bone grafting occurs concurrently with implant placement. This is ideal for minor defects and good primary implant stability. Staged Augmentation Grafting precedes implant placement, allowing for graft maturation. Essential for significant bone deficiencies or compromised sites. Decision Factors Consider defect size, bone quality, patient health, and desired aesthetic outcome. Each case demands careful clinical assessment.
- 71. Soft Tissue Augmentation Hard Tissue Augmentation Optimalperi-implant soft tissue volume and quality are critical for long-term stability and esthetics. Augmentation prevents recession and maintains papilla height, crucial for functional and esthetic outcomes. Techniques like connective tissue grafts enhance tissue biotype. This contributes to a robust biological seal, minimizing bacterial ingress and supporting implant longevity. Adequate bone volume and density are foundational for implant osseointegration and mechanical stability. Augmentation procedures, such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), correct defects and establish proper implant positioning. This minimizes stress concentrations and reduces the risk of late implant failure. Long-term predictability hinges on this stable bone-to-implant interface.
- 72. Conclusion • Adjacent implantsdemand meticulous planning. • Soft tissue augmentation prevents recession and papilla loss. • Hard tissue augmentation ensures bone volume. • Combined approaches optimize esthetics and function. • Long-term success hinges on comprehensive augmentation.
- 73. Understanding and integratingboth soft tissue and bone augmentation is essential for achieving predictable, long-term esthetic and functional outcomes. Augmentation techniques not only compensate for deficiencies but also promote tissue health, with evidence showing that combined approaches can improve papilla index scores by up to 50% and maintain bone levels over 5-10 years