Advancing adaptation through climate information services

Advancing adaptation
through climate
information services
Results of a global survey
on the information requirements
of the financial sector
January 2011

Contents
Foreword by the UNEP Finance Initiative Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) 3
Foreword by Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany 5
1 Executive summary 6
2 Introduction 8
3 Climate change: Affecting financial service providers differently 10
3.1 Insurance and reinsurance
3.2 Lending
3.3 Asset management
4 Information needs of financial service providers 14
4.1 Importance of historical weather data and climate change predictions
4.2 Regional focus
4.3 Sectoral focus
5 Jointly developing climate information and services 17
5.1 The format of improved information services
5.2 The role of public and private actors
5.3 Directions for further action
Annex: The Climate Change Finance Forum, Germany 21
Glossary 23
Acknowledgements 24

Published in January, 2011 by SBI and UNEP FI
Sustainable Business Institute (SBI) e.V.
Burgstraße 4
D-65375 Oestrich-Winkel
Tel: +49 (0) 6723 99 63-0
Fax: +49 (0) 6723 99 63-21
mailbox@sbi21.de
www.sbi21.org
UNEP Finance Initiative
International Environment House
15 Chemin des Anémones
CH-1219 Chatelaine, Geneva
Tel: +41 (0) 22 917 8178
Fax: +41 (0) 22 796 9240
fi@unep.org
www.unepfi.org
The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the
publishers or their signatories, nor do the publishers or their signatories take
any responsibility for actions as a result of the views or opinions expressed
in this document.
This project was undertaken as part of the 2010 work programme of
UNEP FI’s Climate Change Working Group (CCWG). For more information
on the CCWG, please visit: www.unepfi.org/climate
The following financial institutions are members of UNEP FI’s CCWG:
Access Bank, Allianz, Aviva, Axa, BoA Merril Lynch, Calvert, CarbonRe, Chartis
Insurance, Deutsche Bank (Co-Chair), Development Bank of Southern Africa,
Ecobank, HSBC (Co-Chair), IL&FS, ING, JBIC, KfW, La Compagnie Benjamin
de Rothschild, Munich Re, Pax World, SAM, Societe Generale, Standard
Bank, Standard Chartered Bank, Swiss Re, UBS.
This study has been carried out as part of the project
“CFI – Climate Change, Financial Markets and Innovation”, sponsored
by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (BMBF).
For more information please visit www.cfi21.org
Authors/Team
Sustainable Business Institute
Dr Paschen von Flotow
Dr Lutz Cleemann
Anke Hummel
Marco Ludolph
UNEP Finance Initiative
Paul Clements-Hunt, Head of Unit
Remco Fischer, Programme Officer
Jenny Lopez
Editorial assistance:
Peter Cole
Dr Andrew Dlugolecki
Barb Petruzzi
Design: Rebus (rebusparis.com)
Printed in the EU using vegetable oil based inks
on FSC-certified, elemental chlorine free paper
Copyright © 2011
Front cover image: NOAA
Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 14 (GOES-14)
is an earth observation satellite built for the US National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA. Launched in June 2009,
GOES-14 can perform climate studies, cryosphere detection and remote
sensing, and is used to forecast storms and monitor weather conditions,
ocean temperatures, land temperatures and moisture locations.
2 Advancing adaptation through climate information services

Foreword by the UNEP Finance Initiative
Climate Change Working Group (CCWG)
In the past when businesses, governments or civil society spoke about action on climate change,
they usually spoke about reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While the reasons for focusing
on climate change mitigation are manifold and convincing, it appears true that the urgent need to
seriously think about, and take action on, adapting to climate change has been somewhat neglected.
The relationship between mitigation and adaptation should not be seen as a trade-off: We know with
the highest degree of scientific certainty that if we do not seriously reduce global emissions soon,
climate change will be too strong to adapt to; but we know also that, at this stage, the climate will
change no matter what we do. While shifting towards low-carbon and resource-efficient economies,
we therefore need to ensure by all means, that the economies we build are resilient to what will
likely be the significant impacts and financial ramifications of a changing climate.
Shifting to climate-change resilient economies will not be achieved only by governments building
dams, improved water systems, and similar large-scale infrastructure. As with the move to a green
economy, effective adaptation, in a systemic sense, will only occur if the millions of dispersed
business decisions taken every day start to account for climate change factors and impacts. Within
the group of private sector decision-makers, representatives of the financial services sector – banks,
investors and insurers – stand out in the commercial landscape essentially because of their ability
to effectively influence business practice and emerging trends in the real economy: Their daily
engagement with clients and investees of all types and sizes and across virtually all sectors of the
economy shapes the current and future reality of production processes and services. As such, the
financial services sector can be a powerful conduit towards economic systems that are better prepared
for the challenges of climate change.
A financial services sector that understands climate change and pro-actively drives adaptation is not
only in the highest interest of broader economic stability and the societal well-being it underpins;
it is clear that it will increasingly be in the very interest of financial institutions themselves. Banks,
investors, and insurers that get ahead of the curve in understanding and managing the risks linked
with the physical impacts of climate change will build a strong competitive advantage relative to
lagging competitors. The central role of financial institutions in advancing the climate resilience of
societies is not only a matter of leverage and necessity, but also a matter of ability and expertise.
Adapting to climate change boils down to identifying, quantifying, pricing, and mitigating the
financial risks linked with climate change impacts: Risk management is and has always been core
to the business of all financial institutions. The key point is that effective risk management requires
appropriate information input on all parameters that are relevant for business as well as forecasts
of the future development of such factors.
The aim of this study and its underlying survey was to determine, when it comes to the issue of
a changing climate, precisely what the types of information input are that financial institutions
require to put their risk management expertise at the service of broader adaptation and to provide
a first assessment of the current provision to the sector with such information. We believe that this
is a critical step in advancing a process, led by decision-makers in policy and industry, aimed at
improving the provision of climate change information to financial institutions and its systematic
integration into financial decision-making. We also hope that the clear results of this survey will be
a wake-up call to those organisations that have to date failed to pay attention to this issue of utmost
urgency – within the financial sector and beyond.
Results of a global survey on the information requirements of the financial sector 3

UNEP Finance Initiative and its Climate Change Working Group remain ready to continue gathering,
formulating, and channelling international finance input into processes that will improve the
consideration of climate change impacts into financial decision-making. The need for further work
is vast. In particular, large gaps appear to remain in our ability to forecast the impacts of climate
change at levels of high-enough geographic granularity. Therefore, the quality and accessibility
of historic climate data needs to be enhanced and so does the accuracy of climate models as well
as the capacity to translate climate information into financial interpretations. We look forward to
supporting these explorations going forward.
Nick Robins
Head of the Climate Change Centre of Excellence, HSBC holdings plc;
Co-chair UNEP FI Climate Change Working Group
Mark Fulton
Managing Director, Global Head of Climate Change Investment Research, Deutsche Bank;
Co-chair UNEP FI Climate Change Working Group
January 2011

Foreword by Federal Ministry of Education
and Research (BMBF), Germany
The work of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the area of global change
research traditionally focuses on: The study of climate change and its consequences; research
on the technological, economic and social options for climate protection and for adaptation to climate
change; and the dissemination of the resulting knowledge. The BMBF is involved in collaborations
with the research community, public institutions, and the private sector in Germany as well as on
the international level.
The further development of regional climate models and forecasts, of models to assess the regional
impact of climate change, and of information services forms an important basis for climate protection
and for the development of efficient adaptation strategies. For this reason, the BMBF established the
Climate Service Center (CSC) in Hamburg and is supporting the establishment and further development
of similar institutions and networks across the world through international collaborations.
The study “Advancing Adaptation through CLIMATE INFORMATION SERVICES – Results of a
global survey on the information requirements of the financial sector”, which was carried out by the
Sustainable Business Institute (SBI) and the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative
(UNEP FI), underlines the importance of developing climate information services in international
networks. This will only be possible through cooperation between the research community, the
finance industry, and other private- and public-sector institutions.
Insurers, banks, asset managers, and other stakeholders in the financial sector will need more and
better climate information in future. They play an important role as partners in developing such
systems, generating data, and interpreting and using the information. Their cooperation is needed
when it comes to financing innovative solutions for climate protection, managing the consequences
of climate change, and financing the adaptation to climate change.
That is why the BMBF initiated a research and dialogue process on this subject with the financial
sector (organized in the “Climate Change Finance Forum”). The fact that this dialogue is now being
extended to the international level through the collaboration with the UNEP Finance Initiative offers
an excellent outlook.
Berlin/Bonn, January 2011

1 Executive summary
This study focuses on the information needs of the financial sector with respect to direct physical
risks of climate change impacts. Clearly, there are many issues for the sector relating to mitigation
(i.e. the control of greenhouse gas emissions). Mitigation continues to be the top priority. However,
that is not the subject of this study. This survey focuses on the climate information requirements of
the financial sector as part of their and their customers’ adaptation strategies. The evidence comes
from sixty financial service providers, through a survey conducted by the UNEP Finance Initiative,
and the Sustainable Business Institute (SBI), Germany.
To be able to manage climatic risks affecting their business portfolios, financial institutions need
information – in the form of predictions, analyses, and interpretation – that is relevant for their
decisions. It needs to be appropriate to the duration of contracts, the regions where customers hold
assets or undertake operations, and the hazards that are material to the operations of borrowers,
investees, and the insured.
The key challenge for insurers and reinsurers in serving these demands and seizing these new
opportunities lies in adequately identifying, quantifying, and pricing such risks amidst a dynamic
environment. At the same time changing patterns of weather hazards also create new demand for
risk transfer and can thus become a key business opportunity for the insurance sector, as they will
provide space for new insurance markets and products.
A different situation holds for the credit and asset management branches. They are less familiar with
climate change because the physical effects of climate change have not yet systematically turned
into financially relevant consequences. Only just over one-quarter of lenders surveyed claim to
“systematically always” integrate direct effects of climate change in their operations now. Direct risks
like accumulation of risks, changing risk patterns, and increasing credit losses caused by physical
impacts are expected to gain importance in the future (by about 80% of respondents).
The main findings of this survey are as follows:
n The majority of the survey participants expects that both direct as well as indirect risks related to
climate change will increase and will be more relevant in the future for the financial sector.
n The highest importance regarding the significance of information is attached to the category “advice
on reliability of predictions” (around 80% of the participants).
n The majority of respondents rated historical weather data nearly as important information as climate
predictions.
n Overall, less than half of the respondents feel they are sufficiently well-informed. Just one-third feels
“sufficiently informed” on climate change. Even for historical weather data, less than half (43%) feel
adequately informed.
n Climate change predictions for the local and regional level and the time horizon of the next 10 to 30
years are not available or reliable enough for many purposes of the financial sector and the available
information is not in a user-friendly state.
n The survey results show an immense information gap for continents with a high number of developing
countries, but the demand for better climate information applies to all regions, not only those where
the information infrastructure is less developed.

n The respondents require climate-impact information focussed on client sectors. Only one sector
of 13 which the survey considered (healthcare) falls below 50% in terms of being regarded as very
important, and for every sector there is a lack of information.
n Respondents favour a wide range of information in terms of content and media with respect to
regions, sectors, and so forth.
n There is no unanimity between respondents, or even opinions in some cases, about the quality,
timeliness, and value-for-money of current data provision. This might not only reflect the wide range
of different information needs about the impact of climate change, but also the range of familiarity
with these issues among the respondents.
n Most participants in the survey (62 out of 65) are willing to cooperate with data providers, research
institutes, and other partners regarding the further development of different types of information
services. Predominantly, the interest of insurers and reinsurers is higher than average.
From the results of the study it can be assumed that climate expertise is an emerging factor in
competition and success within the financial sector. The need for applied research and information
will lead to new information value chains with public and private partners.
This international survey has provided valuable indications of the information requirements of the
finance sector on climate variability and climate change. In addition, these studies have yielded a
number of key insights:
n Preferences about the format of improved information services
n General willingness of financial institutions to cooperate
n First indications regarding the roles of public and private actors
n Major knowledge gaps and directions for further action

2 Introduction
The commercial success of insurers, reinsurers, lenders, and asset managers relies on their
ability to identify, quantify, and manage risks. It is, therefore, crucial for decision makers
of the financial services industry to improve their understanding about the risks related to climate
change as well as about the roles of the industry and best practice in climate change mitigation and
adaptation. From a broader, societal perspective the financial services sector can serve as an effective
conduit to foster awareness of climate change in most other sectors of the economy; it can indeed
also act as a multiplier of knowledge and expertise.
The World Climate Conference 3 “Better climate information for a better future” has led to the “Global
Framework for Climate Services” including a “Global Climate Observing System”. The framework
will link science-based predictions and information on climate change with the management of
related risks and opportunities in order to support adaptation to climate change. The current report
is a contribution towards the development of such climate information services and a respective
framework.
This study aims to initiate a discussion on the information needs of the international financial services
sector regarding the medium and long term physical impacts of climate change at local level. Their
needs are surveyed on a worldwide basis – as well as across financial business lines. As such, this
report is a step towards determining how such information needs could best be met.
For this purpose, the information needs and perceptions of financial institutions are examined
separately according to the respective business field. The three categories analysed are: (i) insurers
and reinsurers, (ii) lenders, and (iii) asset managers.
The report presents the results of an international survey undertaken by the Climate Change Working
Group (CCWG) of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) and
the Sustainable Business Institute (SBI) (see back cover for more information). This report is part
of the project “Climate Change, Financial Markets and Innovation (CFI)”, sponsored by the Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, and supported by the German “Climate
Change Finance Forum” (for more information see page 21).
A total of 60 institutions from all continents (approximately one third of total UNEP FI member
institutions), including developed as well as developing countries, responded to the questionnaire.
(Several of these financial service providers operate worldwide). Some of them - institutions with
activities in more than one of the business lines - completed more than one of the three sections.
The resulting 65 responses are split as follows: Insurers and reinsurers (11 responses), lenders (35
responses), and asset managers (19 responses).1 Most of the participating financial institutions are
members of UNEP Finance Initiative.
The distribution of respondents among continents is shown in Figure 1. The survey was conducted
during the period February through April 2010. In view of the exploratory nature of this exercise,
quantitative analysis is not the main focus, but where appropriate, reference is made to the statistics
of the survey. Importantly, the respondents were asked to comment wherever possible, not simply
to ‘check the boxes’, and these comments are a valuable source of insights into the industry’s
perceptions and practices.
1. Total numbers may differ in some cases due to the fact that not every question of the survey was responded to by each of the participating financial institutions.

Figure 1
Regional
make-up
of survey
respondents
(based on HQ
location)
32
Europe
5
Africa
5
North America
2
South America
13
Asia
3
Australia / South Pacific
The key findings of the survey are summarised in the following sections. The first part of the survey
examined the extent to which financial service providers feel they are affected by the direct risks
and physical impacts of climate change today, and how they expect that exposure to develop in
the future. An investigation of the information needs of international financial service providers was
conducted in the second part of the survey. The report concludes by raising some of the key issues
in developing improved information systems.

3 Climate change:
Affecting financial service providers differently
A changing climate will lead to changes in temperatures, increases in the frequencies and intensities
of extreme weather events such as storms, heavy rainfall, hail, lightning, droughts and floods,
as well as triggering slow-onset events like sea-level rise and desertification. These trends are already
increasing the risk of economic losses. The international efforts of climate change mitigation will
probably lessen these effects, but significant impacts from climate change are unavoidable.
This section sets out the views of financial institutions on the effects of climate change to date, and
what they are doing about it. The respondents are already aware of certain types of climate change
impacts and the resultant risks, both direct as well as indirect. The issue of water scarcity, for instance,
was mentioned as an example of a direct risk by several of the participating institutions. Reputational
risks, which are of indirect character, were referred to by several survey participants as well. These
can materialise not just in a mitigation context – where a financial institution is seen as a polluter
in light of the GHG emissions for which it is responsible – but also in an adaptation context where
financial institutions might be seen as incapable of adapting to new and relevant circumstances such
as changed weather patterns or shifting stakeholder expectations.
Nearly all survey participants share the expectation that both direct as well as indirect risks related
to climate change will increase, and will be more material in the future and / or they recognise the
need to extend risk assessment and due diligence practice to explicitly cover climate change related
risks, including those generated by the physical impacts of climate change.
However, given the high degree of uncertainty concerning the possible physical impacts and economic
consequences of climate change, survey participants are unsure about the nature and implications
of how exactly climate change related risks will affect financial firms and their clients.
This uncertainty needs to be reduced which means that climate change induced changes have to be
predicted as reliably as possible, so that the resultant impacts on economic actors can be analysed.
On the basis of such information, financial institutions will be able to improve their risk identification,
assessment and management systems.
Furthermore, predictions and analyses will have to be customised to the type, location, and customer
base of the financial institution concerned. The individual financial branches differ significantly in
terms of their types of risks (insurance, credit and investment risks) and time horizons (ranging
from hours and days to years and decades), and accordingly, their information needs regarding
climate change, also differ significantly. Survey respondents as well as their customers and investee
companies operate in different regions of the world. The survey confirms that location plays an
important role; not only with regards to the factual predictions required of physical climate change
impacts at the local level, but also in terms of the subjective perception of climate change risks by
companies. In part, this can be explained by differences in the extent to which climate change is
already apparent in different parts of the world.
In the following sections, the main take-aways are presented in more detail for each of the business
fields investigated: insurance (with reinsurance); lending; and asset management.

3.1 Insurance and reinsurance
Providing risk transfer products covering losses from natural disasters is a traditional business area
for insurance companies. They are expert at identifying, quantifying, and pricing weather-related
risks. However, despite this expertise, the insurance industry is facing new challenges as a result
of shifting climate patterns, especially regarding variations in frequency, intensity, and regional
occurrence of extreme weather events. Already insurers are recording variations which are quite
different from historical experience and data (see Figure 2) – and they expect these changes will
increase in future.
Eleven insurers from eight countries and three continents participated in this survey. They
n recorded an increase in weather-related damages (10), and expect these to increase (11)
n reported an accumulation of such risks (8), and expect accumulation risks to increase (9)
n expect risks to change (8), and anticipate these changes will accelerate in future (9)
What are the impacts of these developments and changes on the insurance industry?
n Already, insurers have recorded a demand for additional risk transfer (or risk absorption) capacity
(7) and they expect that this demand will continue to grow (10)
n Amendments to insurance products are happening (7) or will become unavoidable (11)
n They are developing new insurance products (9) or plan to do so in future (11)
The response of insurers and reinsurers to climate change – modifying insurance products and
developing new ones – is still at an early stage, but the survey highlights that the insurance industry is
taking a systematic and proactive stance. Therefore, it is likely that business development and strategy
in the insurance industry will increasingly be influenced by climate change-related factors.
Changing and increasing weather-related risks are also an opportunity for the insurance sector as
they will provide space for new insurance markets and products. The key challenge for insurers
and reinsurers in seizing these new opportunities lies in adequately identifying, quantifying, and
pricing such risks amidst a dynamic environment.
How an individual insurance company will be affected by climate change depends on its unique
circumstances, including factors such as the location, type and structure of its customer base (for a
more detailed consideration of these factors, refer to section 4).
Figure 2
Overall losses
and insured
losses –
absolute values
and long-term
trends of major
weather-related
catastrophes
1950-2009
Source: Munich Re
2009
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Overall losses (in 2009 values)
Insured losses (in 2009 values)
Trend overall losses
Trend insured losses
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
USD billion

3.2 Lending
Lenders provide finance to households, public agencies, individual firms or specific projects.
Credit risk assessment and due diligence are core elements of conventional lending. However, the
identification and management of new, direct as well as indirect, climate-change-related risks that
are often complex as well as uncertain, are not traditional competences found in banks. Indeed,
as the survey revealed from comments, often lenders rely upon insurers to accept these risks on
their behalf.
Regarding direct climate-change-induced risks, less than half of the 35 lending institutions that
participated in this survey feel that “already today” their credit transactions are affected by:
n An accumulation of risks (17 out of 35)
n Changing risk patterns (15 out of 35), and
n Increased credit losses due to direct, physical effects of climate change (12 out of 35)
However, about 80% (28 of 35) feel they will be more important in the future. It must be noted that
there is some confusion as to the definition of ‘direct risks’ with some respondents including carbon-related
issues in their comments. This is indicative of the lenders’ preoccupation with emissions
policy, rather than climate impacts.
As many as two-thirds of the participants see reputational risks linked with climate change as
“relevant today” (25 out of 35). As with direct risks, 80% (28 of 35) expect this kind of risk to gain
importance in the future.
Strong agreement (far more than two-thirds) also exists regarding the need to modify and/or extend
credit risk assessment practice to address those risks – now, not just in future. A minority considers
that the direct and indirect risks of climate change “will not be more relevant in the future” or that
they “don’t know” (6 or less of the 35 participating institutions for each of the risk categories).
On the issue of integrating climate change into due diligence and risk management procedures,
about one-quarter of the participants claim to “systematically always” integrate direct, physical effects
of climate change already, more than one-third does, “but only in exceptional cases”, and another
quarter plans “to do so in the future.” A minority (4 out of 34 respondents) answered “currently
not” (see Figure 3 below).
Figure 3
Lenders’
current
practice on
treating climate
change as a
risk factor
24% Yes,
systematically always
40% Yes, but only
in exceptional cases
24% No, but we plan
to do so in the future
12% No, currently not

In addition to the climate change impacts on credit transactions, lenders were asked about the risk
exposure of their own operations (e.g., regarding effects on own buildings, infrastructure, employees
etc.). Half of the survey participants feel this is material (17 out of 35). About the same number expect
an increasing direct exposure in the future. This question was only addressed to lenders because, in
contrast to insurers and asset managers, they usually posses a dense network of branch offices.
These results highlight the awareness among lenders of the potential risks of climate change; direct
and indirect, as well as through client exposure and ‘own estate’. Many institutions have already started
adapting to and mitigating such risks with appropriate strategies or measures, e.g. formulating policies
and response plans. Awareness-raising among stakeholders was also identified as an important step.
At the same time, it should be noted that even among lenders, understanding is sometimes lacking;
a minority of respondents appear to confuse climate change impacts with emissions policy.
3.3 Asset management
Asset managers that buy securities linked with listed companies (usually in the form of shares and
bonds, often of multinationals) cannot really analyse the physical risks of the multiple individual
locations that a listed company operates in. Therefore, analysts and asset managers in these markets
rely on highly aggregated information, or self-reporting by companies.
Asked about the integration of direct effects of climate change when conducting due diligence and stock
picking processes in active portfolio management, seven out of the 19 asset managers answered: “Yes,
systematically always”. A further nine replied “Yes, but only in exceptional cases”. One of the three asset
managers not considering direct impacts at the moment is planning to do so in future.
There is little difference in the consideration of either direct or indirect risks of climate change among
the 19 asset managers, as observed with lenders. They are either already incorporating these indirect
risks systematically (8), in exceptional cases (8), or planning to do so in the future (3).
Some of the participating asset managers incorporate the sustainability performance or environmental
impact of a firm in their investment process. However, aspects of climate change are usually just a small
element within the universe of corporate sustainability performance indicators. Other asset managers
have integrated a “Climate Change Risk Scoring” system into their own portfolio management.
Finally, a caveat is necessary on the data from this field, because the respondents are not typical of
the universe of asset managers, where generally speaking climate change impacts are ignored. The
comments within the responses also indicate that there is some confusion between the direct and
indirect effects of climate change, as with lenders.

4 Information needs of financial service providers
T
his section aims to shed light on:
n The relevance of certain data and information categories for financial institutions in general and the
respective level of information / data supply now
n Respondents’ estimates of their own knowledge regarding regional climate change-related information
in their own country as well as internationally, and the availability of information
n The exposure to the direct impacts of climate change of different sectors / client groups and the
corresponding level of information / data supply now
Much of the information was gathered in a subjective, commentary style, which is not suitable for
statistical tabulation, but can provide valuable insights into the current state of play in this area.
Today, financial service providers use a variety of different sources to access relevant information
about climate change and its impacts. These include in-house research, academic research, consultants,
seminars, specialized analysts / third-party service providers, trade networks and international
organisations (e.g., IPCC, UNEP, NGOs, etc.), government agencies and the media and news agencies
(news, radio, internet, technical publications etc.). Additionally, insurance companies often receive
information from insurance associations and reinsurance companies, and the insurance sector has
developed its own in-house weather models.
Nevertheless, financial institutions feel that there is a lack of user-oriented information (some mention
”too generic to be used for specific decisions” or consider them being of “limited applicability”).
There is great inconsistency in the perception of the quality of data; it ranges from “good quality”
to “qualities vary greatly” and “need for more information.” This inconsistency also applies to the
timely availability of the data and the value-for-money factor. Some participants also find it difficult to
comment on factors such as quality, timely availability and value-for-money. This lack of unanimity
or even opinion might not only reflect the wide range of different information needs about the impact
of climate change, but also the range of familiarity with these issues among the respondents.
The majority of the 65 respondents – across the three different business fields – state that it is necessary
(27) or at least advantageous (28) if the data provider is familiar with the nature of their (insurance
/ credit / asset management) business.
4.1 Importance of historical weather data
and climate change predictions
More than half of the respondents feel that the level of information today is not sufficient.2
Survey participants were asked about the relevance of six different features of weather and climate
change information and the adequacy of the current data.
2 It is interesting that a similar view was noted by the UK Government‘s advisory body, the Committee on Climate Change in its first report on adaptation How well
prepared is the UK for climate change? published on September 16, 2010. It states on pg. 54 ‘many businesses do not think they have access to adequate weather
data and climate projections, preventing them from assessing risks from current and future climate.’

On historical weather they were asked about:
I. High definition data on observed changes in temperatures, in frequency and intensity of extreme
events like storms, heavy rain, hail and lightning, as well as too much water (floods) or too little
water (droughts) on the regional level
II. High definition data on changes in the frequency of extreme values of the parameters above
III. Interpretation and evaluation of the validity, credibility, and reliability of available data
On climate change predictions they were asked about:
IV. Concrete statements about expected changes for a certain location and a defined 5-10 year time
horizon
V. Concrete statements about expected changes for a certain location and a defined 10-30 year time
horizon
VI. Interpretation and evaluation of the quality and confidence of statements and predictions
The significance of information in each of the six information features mentioned above ranges from
“average importance” to “greatest importance” for the majority of the financial service providers
(from 69% for feature I, up to 82% for feature VI).
Most important are predictions and their interpretation. The “interpretation and evaluation of the
quality and confidence of statements and predictions” (information category VI) was considered
most significant with 51 out of 62 respondents (82%) deeming it important (“greatest importance,”
“great importance” or “average importance”). This is closely followed by information category IV
“Concrete statements about expected changes for a certain location and a defined 5-10 years time
horizon” (49 out of 62 participants) and category V which refers to corresponding information for
a 10-30 year horizon (47 out of 62 participants).
Regarding the availability of information, very few of the respondents feel “very well informed”
on any of the six dimensions. Only 43% of the respondents feel “sufficiently informed” regarding
information on historical weather (features I to III). Just one-third feels “sufficiently informed” on
climate change (features IV to VI).
4.2 Regional focus
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate change is affecting and
will affect the various regions and landforms of the Earth in different ways. It is, therefore, crucial
that climate information systems are structured spatially down to sub-country level for information
such as features I to VI discussed in section 6.1.
Figure 4 below shows the proportion of respondents that are “badly informed and/or would like to
be better informed” about climatic risks in six macro-regions:
Figure 4
Proportion of
respondents
inadequately
informed
about regional
climatic risks
Europe (27 of 48 operating in Europe)
North America (27 of 40 operating in North America)
56%
68%
Australia/South Pacific (29 of 39 operating in Australia/South Pacific)
Asia (33 of 44 operating in Asia)
South America (35 of 40 operating in South America)
Africa (33 of 37 operating in Africa)
74%
75%
88%
89%
0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

The results show a large information gap for continents with a high number of developing countries,
but the demand for better climate information refers to all macro-regions of the world, not only
those where information infrastructure is less developed.
Nearly half the respondents (26 out of 55) are “badly informed” and/or “would like to be better
informed” about their own country, with about two-thirds wishing for better information concerning
sensitive areas (river catchments, coastal areas, mountainous landscapes).
4.3 Sectoral focus
A key question for financial services providers is how exactly different client segments and economic
sectors will be affected by climate change. For instance, there are industries where value creation
depends highly on geographical factors, or that are especially affected by climate change (e.g. real
estate, agriculture and forestry, tourism, etc.). With such information, financial service providers and
their clients can assess whether these industries are taking appropriate adaptive measures.
Figure 5 below shows two aspects. Firstly, what proportion of respondents view a sector as being
very important (of “great” or “greatest importance“) regarding its exposure to the direct effects of
climate change. Secondly, how many feel there is a significant lack of information about the sector’s
exposure to climate change (“poorly informed” and/or “would like to be better informed”). (N.B. not
all service providers operate in every sector.)
Figure 5
Respondents’
view
concerning
economic
sectors
(% of
correspondents)
Agriculture
Power
Buildings
Infrastucture
Renewables
Oil & gas
Utilities
Mining
Tourism
Automobile
Chemicals
Financial
Healthcare
Very important
Information gap
0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Only one sector (healthcare) falls below 50% in terms of being regarded as very important. Even
for those sectors that are considered to be less critical regarding their exposure to the direct effects
of climate change, financial service providers feel there is a big information gap. In fact, the gap is
almost constant throughout all sectors.
The general demand for specific sector and industry-related climate change information is also
confirmed by the high readiness to cooperate with climate service institutions in the development
of industry analyses (see section 5).

5 Jointly developing climate information
and services
The survey confirmed that climate change impacts are economically highly relevant for the
financial sector and the private sector in general. Improved climate change information will
enable the financial sector and its clients to better calculate risks and also will help policy makers
to better weigh the costs of prediction-based adaptation measures against the costs of inaction from
a macroeconomic perspective.
This requires greater climate expertise within the private sector; a process already under way, but
needing further development. Also, the evolution of climate information services more scientific
research on climate (impact) models and efforts to translate scientific knowledge and existing
information into user-orientated information, applied information, and consulting services. In
addition, there is a strong need for more extensive co-operation between users and suppliers, public
and private actors, scientists, and decision makers. They have different competencies which can be
used to build more efficient and effective value chains for climate information services.
The survey revealed:
n Preferences about the format of improved information systems, and the general willingness of
financial institutions to collaborate in developing them (5.1)
n First indications regarding the roles of public and private actors (5.2)
n Major knowledge gaps and directions for further action (5.3)
5.1 The format of improved information services
There is a preference for ‘applied’ research and information, tailored to specific sectors or geographies;
financial institutions are primarily not interested in pure climate information, but in a wide range of
information services for specific purposes as listed below.
For many of these applications, leading insurers and other financial service providers have developed
statistics and models and generated the relevant competencies.
The further improvements of information services can thus build on co-operation between partners
with different experience and knowledge: The respondents (62 of 65) expressed a broad and strong
interest to collaborate with weather and climate data and information providers, research institutes, and
other partners regarding the (further) development of various information services and formats:
n sectoral analyses (54)
n regional scenarios (40)
n project databases (e.g. for renewable energy projects) (39)
n databases on weather/extreme events (26)
n loss and catastrophe models (24)
n loss databases (21)
In addition, insurers are interested in studies about market potential for new and / or modified
insurance products.

In terms of the format for information, again survey respondents are interested in a wide range of
media, as below (figures are for the 65 institutions that answered this question):
n Periodical reports about the effects of climate change on certain sectors and companies (61)
n Best practice cases on tackling risks and opportunities in the financial services industry (60)
n Periodical reports about the effects of climate change on certain regions (51)
n Further training (seminars / conferences) (33)
n Online services (FAQ etc.) (27)
n Ad hoc statements / Expert opinions (27)
n Periodical reports about the state of the art in climate science (27)
From a market perspective the information services and formats mentioned above are (business)
opportunities for applied research institutes, information providers, risk management and adaptation
consultants, environmental experts, financial analysts, and other private and public actors.
5.2 The role of public and private actors
The survey confirmed that improved and applied climate information is of high economic value
for the financial sector and the private sector in general. Insurers and to some degree lenders and
asset managers have already developed many relevant competencies, and so they are in a better
position to manage the climate change related risks of their business and their clients. Insofar climate
expertise is an emerging factor of competition. For this reason financial service providers, as well as
other actors in the private sector certainly have information needs at a very granular level regarding
specific business decisions. Some of this information partly can be generated privately – and therefore
might be seen as a private good.
Today these information needs and the need for expertise are more obvious for the insurance markets
as insurance of such weather- or climate change-related risks is a market of increasing importance
and at the same time of increasing uncertainty. Therefore especially leading (re-)insurers have
built up respective competencies, developed loss databases for their markets (in some countries as
database of their industry associations), conducted regional and sector-specific studies with research
institutes and have developed (internal) competence or service centres. Based on their expertise
leading (re-)insurers not only improve their own risk management, but also can help their clients
within different sectors and regions to assess and minimise their risks, adapt to changing risks, and
insure remaining risks.
For most lenders and asset managers worldwide these weather and climate change related risks
are emerging risks – already relevant today, but expected to increase in the future. Some of them
have already adapted their risk management, have conducted studies and have improved research
tools for their asset management.
To what extent insurers, lenders, and asset managers will have to improve their in-house expertise
or can utilise external consultants and re-insurers will depend on the type of risks of their clients and
investments and the regions they are active in, the effectiveness of adaptation strategies, the quality
of public information, and last but not least, the expertise they can buy from external experts.
Leading financial service providers also go beyond their direct business and help build (independent)
risk management capacities and work with national governments and international organisations
on adaptation strategies.
Nevertheless, reliable climate change information for risk management and adaptation measures
within the private sector needs a long “value chain” of research, public climate (impact) models,
open debates on and interpretation of quality and confidence of these models and their predictions.

Crucially, also access to standardised (historical) weather information is necessary in order to ensure
a common reference framework for the private and the public sector at all levels.
Because of the potentially serious consequences of the economic and social impacts of climate
change and the uncertainness of these impacts, the development of such common knowledge is
considered a public task. It serves both, the public and private interest – even more today than in
the past. Without information transparency, stakeholders, in both private and public sector, will fail
to develop economically efficient responses for climate change adaptation and risk management.
Prevention of losses through improved climate information systems is also significant for the
economy at large, particularly in smaller countries and at a local level, not just for individual firms
and households.
Already national and international initiatives are on the way to address these challenges. However, it
is time for a broader national and international discussion on the different roles and responsibilities
of the public and the private sector actors – along the climate information value chain – to develop
and provide appropriate climate knowledge and information. These efforts should include other
economic sectors and industries (e.g. energy, agriculture, real estate, utilities, and tourism) which
rely on weather and climate-related information and have specific expertise and information needs.
Models of such public/private value chains should be developed in stages, with particular attention
to conditions of use, stakeholders’ interests, and the risks to be addressed.
5.3 Directions for further action
The study clearly showed that there is a need for more precise knowledge about the impact of
climate change at the regional level within a time horizon of 10 to 30 years. Access to existing
information and/or availability at all, are not sufficient. This indicates a need for research to provide
more precise climate predictions. The reliability of climate model predictions at the regional level
is still problematical for many important parameters like storms and precipitation. A key question
is, what can be achieved realistically and when? It is a matter of real concern to the finance sector
and other stakeholders.
Furthermore, there is the ongoing challenge of providing public platforms which are able to explain
the remaining key uncertainties and give advice on the reliability of predictions.
Regarding general access to all historical and future weather data, the respondents’ answers indicate
significant deficiencies. Consequently, standardisation of weather observation data and the provision
of general access is an urgent need.
These challenges are considered as basically public tasks and are a relevant part of the agenda of
international and national public institutions responsible for climate change research and weather
observation.
The efficiency and effectiveness of national and international adaptation strategies builds on the
expertise of private actors and the development of specific information value chains and markets.
Therefore, it is of private as well as of public interest to observe and understand to what degree
private actors will pick up the results of (applied) research and make use of such information. Hence,
it is the purpose of this study to raise awareness within the financial sector and beyond about the
increasing need for climate change expertise.
The knowledge gaps that have been identified, the discussion about the roles of the private and
public sector, and the format of improved climate information services all reflect the responses from
three financial service sectors: Insurance, lending and asset management, and further discussions
with industry experts. The results are based on the respondents’ experience of interaction with a
wide range of different client sectors in all five continents. Moreover, the study provides insights
which go beyond the boundaries of the financial sector. Nevertheless, certainly the questions of how

to design, organise, and finance a worldwide information architecture and related services drawing
on public and private actors needs much more discussion and step by step development – bottom
up from interaction on a regional and national level and top down from a global perspective.
Better climate information for a better future:
Developments on the international agenda
The results of this study accords with, and at the same time is a contribution to, the
international efforts regarding “Better climate information for a better future”. At the World
Climate Conference 3 (WCC-3), which took place August 31 - September 4, 2009 in Geneva
(Switzerland), the need for global climate information services was particularly emphasised.
A central outcome of the conference was the need for a Global Framework for Climate
Services including a Global Climate Observing System (see following figure) in order to
better link science-based regional climate forecasts and information with the management
of climate-related risks and opportunities by practitioners and real-world decision makers:
http://www.wmo.int/wcc3/page_en.php.
Figure:
Global
Framework
for Climate
Services
(Source: The Vision
for World Climate
Conference-3
(WCC-3), Zillman
2009 p. 8)
According to the decision of WCC-3, a High-level taskforce (HLT) for the Global Framework
for Climate Services (GFCS) was established to strengthen the production, availability, delivery
and application of science-based climate prediction and services. Among others, its scope of
work contains the development of the components of the GFCS, the development of options for
its governance and the outlining of a plan for its implementation. For more information please see
http://www.wmo.int/hlt-gfcs/.

Annex The Climate Change Finance Forum, Germany
The “Climate Change Finance Forum” is a central research and dialogue platform for the
effective implementation of the climate policy of the German Federal Government. The
Forum serves for the development and the implementation of research initiatives and
the systematic cooperation with the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
The members of the ”Climate Change Finance Forum“ are: Altira AG, Axa Versicherung
AG, BayernLB, Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V.,
Bundesverband Deutscher Kapitalbeteiligungsgesellschaften e.V., Commerzbank AG,
Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Postbank AG, Deutscher Sparkassen- und Giroverband e.V.,
Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e.V., Munich Re, UniCredit Bank AG
(HypoVereinsbank).
The activities of the forum are coordinated by the Sustainable Business Institute (SBI) as part of the project
“CFI - Climate Change, Financial Markets and Innovation” funded by the Federal Ministry of Education
and Research (BMBF), Germany. For more information about the project see: www.cfi21.org.
Climate change and information needs
A first survey was conducted by SBI with the “Climate Change Finance Forum” in 2009 to determine the
specific information needs of financial service providers in Germany on the occasion of the creation of
the Climate Service Center (CSC) in Hamburg, Germany (2009). The CSC is funded by the German Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Together with a network of partners, it works towards
narrowing the gap between existing scientific climate knowledge and data on the one hand and its
practical application in industry, economy, policy, and society on the other. The results of this survey are
summarised in the report “Jointly Developing Climate Information Systems: Requirements for the Climate
Service Center (CSC) from the perspective of the financial sector,” which can be downloaded from:
http://www.cfi21.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CSC-Bericht_englisch_web.pdf.
Comparing results of the international survey with the national one conducted in Germany, it seems
that more of the respondents to the international survey observe and expect risks regarding climate
change impacts. One reason for the difference may be that some of the financial service providers
operate in regions where climate change impacts are more obvious than in Germany. Another reason
may be that in the international survey, only those answered the questionnaire who are already
aware of these risks, whereas in the German survey, all major insurers and lenders were involved,
no matter what their involvement with climatic risks is.

The development of information systems requires further applied research into the information needs
of decision-makers. In the context of the survey among financial service providers in Germany in
2009, and additional personal interviews, the needs for research and development were particularly
centred on the following topics:
n Climate impact research to assess the effects of convective extreme weather events (such as hail
and heavy rainfall etc.) on the loss potential
n Climate impact research in the fields of agriculture and forestry (multi-peril insurance), the water
sector, land use planning and the built environment
n Assessment of extreme events with a ‘return period’ greater than 1,000 years
n Loss prevention, adaptation (e.g. land use planning and the built environment, investigation of the
adaptation needs of drainage systems
So far, two workshops have been organised by the Climate Service Center (CSC) (http://www.
climate-service-center.de) and the Sustainable Business Institute (SBI) with support from the German
Insurance Association (GDV) (http://www.gdv.de) on the following topics:
January 2010: “Climate impact research to assess the effects of convective extreme weather
events on the loss potential in Germany”
Participants from meteorological research institutes, insurance companies, water management
companies, as well as from the competence centre on flood hydrology in Cologne, jointly determined
the State of the Art and the Needs for Further Research and Development within the Framework of
three Working Groups: “Analysis” “Modelling” and “Risk Management.”
April 2010: “Regionalised Assessment and Modelling of Revenue Losses in Crop Farming due to
Climate Change-induced Increase of Extreme Weather Events”
The aims of the workshop included: The identification of further research; networking of potential
partners from policymaking, administration, the professions and the insurance sector on pure and
applied research; analysis of verified research results; and identification of the needs and possibilities
regarding long-term climate information services in public-private partnerships.

Glossary
Accumulation of risks
Very large number of risks that may materialise due to one single event
CDP Carbon Disclosure Project (independent organization gathering and publishing primary corporate
climate change information)
Climate change refers to a significant shift in typical weather conditions
Climate Change Finance Forum
Research and dialogue platform for the effective implementation of the climate policy of the
German Federal Government
CSC Climate Service Center, Germany (intended to connect existing institutions and networks to
provide better climate change related information)
Direct effects (of climate change)
Physical consequences like a shift in temperatures, sea level rise or an increase in intensity,
severity, and variability of extreme weather events
GHG emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Indirect effects (of climate change): The political, regulatory, social, and legal or market reactions to and
consequences of climate change
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Prediction Statement of future conditions, (in this case the climate), dependent on specified assumptions.
This differs from a forecast, which is a definite statement of what future conditions will be.
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (environmental organisation in the United Nations
system)
UNEP FI United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (global partnership between UNEP
and the financial sector)
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (international system to tackle global
warming)
WCC-3 World Climate Conference 3 (organized by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
aims to advance the development of climate services and to enhance their application to socio-economic
planning)

Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the following participants:
• Allianz (Germany)
• ASN Bank (Netherlands)
• Association of Development Financing Institutions in Asia & the Pacific (ADFIAP) (Philippines)
• Aviva (UK)
• AXA (France)
• BAGER Safe Environment for Health Services P.L.C (Ethiopia)
• Banco Santander (Spain)
• Bank Sarasin (Switzerland)
• Bayerische Landesbank (Germany)
• Caledonia Wealth Management (USA)
• CarbonRe (Switzerland)
• Citigroup (USA)
• Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Australia)
• Deutsche Asset Management (USA) / Deutsche Bank
• Development Bank of Southern Africa (South Africa)
• Development Bank of the Philippines (Philippines)
• DnB NOR (Norway)
• EIC Environmental Investment Network (UK)
• European Investment Bank (Luxembourg)
• Henderson Global Investors (UK)
• HypoVereinsbank / UniCredit Bank AG (Germany)
• Interamerican Hellenic Insurance (Greece)
• Intesa Sanpaolo (Italy)
• Kookmin Bank (South Korea)
• KPA (Sweden)
• Land Bank of the Philippines (Philippines)
• Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (Germany)
• Meta Asset Management (Sweden)
• Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation (Japan)
• Munich Re (Germany)
• Natixis Asset Management (France)
• Nedbank Group (South Africa)
• Nikko Asset Management (Japan)
• Nollen Group – Prime Energy Investment Fund (Thailand)
• RMB Asset Management (South Africa)
• Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (Sweden)
• Société Générale (France)
• Standard Chartered (UK)
• Svenska Handelsbanken (Sweden)
• Swiss Re (Switzerland)
• Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance (Japan)
• Turkiye Sinai Kalkinma Bankasi (Turkey)
• UBS (Switzerland)
• Vancity Group of Companies (Canada)
• VicSuper (Australia)
• WestLB (Germany)
• Yes Bank Limited (India)
• Zürcher Kantonalbank (Switzerland)
Twelve further institutions participated that prefer their names not to be disclosed.
We wish to thank all the other parties involved. Special thanks to Prof Dr Dr Peter Höppe, Munich Re, for initial
discussions on climate change information as well as Sabine Schlüter-Mayr, Munich Re, for invaluable support
in the review process. We also thank Dr Lutz Cleeman, Remco Fischer, Dr Andrew Dlugolecki, Peter Cole,
Marco Ludolph and Anke Hummel for their support in the evaluation of questionnaires and their assistance in
writing this report, as well as the following CCWG institutions for their feedback: AXA and Standard Chartered
Bank. Last but not least we thank Dr Regina Eich-Brod, Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF),
Germany, and Dr Horst Steg, German Aerospace Center, for their support.
Paul Clements-Hunt Paschen von Flotow
Head UNEP Finance Initiative Head Sustainable Business Institute (SBI)

UNEP Finance Initiative (UNEP FI)
The United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) is a strategic
public-private partnership between UNEP and the global financial sector. UNEP works with
nearly 200 banks, investment firms, insurers and a range of partner organisations, to understand
the impacts of environmental, social and governance issues on financial performance and
sustainable development. Through a global programme encompassing research, training,
events and regional activities, UNEP FI identifies, promotes and realises the adoption of best
environmental and sustainability practice at all levels of institutional operations. Through its
Climate Change Working Group (CCWG), UNEP FI aims to understand the roles of the finance
sector in addressing climate change, as well as to advance the integration of climate change
factors – both risks and opportunities – into financial decision- making.
The following financial institutions are members of UNEP FI’s CCWG: Access Bank, Allianz,
Aviva, Axa, BoA Merril Lynch, Calvert, CarbonRe, Chartis Insurance, Deutsche Bank (Co-
Chair), Development Bank of Southern Africa, Ecobank, HSBC (Co-Chair), IL&FS, ING, JBIC,
KfW, La Compagnie Benjamin de Rothschild, Munich Re, Pax World, SAM, Societe Generale,
Standard Bank, Standard Chartered Bank, Swiss Re, UBS.
Sustainable Business Institute (SBI)
The Sustainable Business Institute (SBI), Germany, is a research center founded in 1987 –
the year in which “Our Common Future”, the Brundtland Report, was published by the
United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. Since then, we have
been working on a wide spectrum of issues and conducted studies with several national and
international stakeholders including United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
(UNCTAD) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the German Government.
Among these were studies on sustainable and responsible investment, Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI), voluntary agreements and environmental management. Furthermore, we are publisher
of www.sustainable-investment.org.
We are currently focussed on the role of financial service providers regarding climate change
adaptation and mitigation.

Advancing adaptation through climate information services

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Advancing adaptation through climate information services

Recently uploaded

Advancing adaptation through climate information services