An analytical study on investors’ awareness and perception

International Journal of Advanced Research in Management (IJARM), ISSN 0976 –
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED
6324 (Print), ISSN 0976 – 6332 (Online), Volume 3, Issue 1, January- June (2012)
RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT (IJARM)

ISSN 0976 - 6324 (Print)
ISSN 0976 - 6332 (Online)
IJARM
Volume 3, Issue 1, January- June (2012), pp. 01-10
© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijarm.html
©IAEME
Journal Impact Factor (2011): 0.5218 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY ON INVESTORS’ AWARENESS AND
PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE HEDGE FUNDS IN GUJARAT
Dr. Narayan Baser, Associate Professor
Dr. Mamta Brahmbhatt, Associate Professor
Shri Jairambhai Patel Institute of Business Management and Computer Applications-
formerly known as National Institute of cooperative management, (SJPI- NICM)
Gandhinagar, Gujarat
Jay Talati, Assistant Professor
Riddhi Sanghavi, Assistant Professor
Department of Management, Noble Group of Institutions, Junagadh, Gujarat

ABSTRACT

Hedge Funds in India are among relatively new investment opportunities. In spite of
tall claims that Hedge Funds have been demystified, the fact remains that a big
segment of the investment community is not aware of the risk return permutations of
this asset. The Monetary Policy of 2007-08 gave a never-before opportunity to Hedge
Funds- Access to the Indian HNI's and Institutional investor's share of Portfolio Pie.
According to analysts at Singapore’s fund research house Eurekahedge, Indian Hedge
Fund Index returned over 5% in the first eight months of 2010 vis-à-vis 2% gains by
benchmark Sensex in the same period. In modern times, without market research and
without understanding the investors’ needs & desire, it becomes difficult to sell the
investment products. Financial institutions have realized this fact and begin to find out
the needs of investors and tried to satisfy them. An attempt is made here to identify
the awareness and perception of the investors’ towards hedge funds as an investment
avenue with special reference to Gujarat state.

INTRODUCTION
India, fast growing emerging financial market, is very keen for new investment
propositions, particularly investment in hedge funds. Presence of systematic
institutional framework for hedging, regulatory factors, good information disclosure
standards, a well-developed capital market, liberalized stable economy, rapid
economic and social reforms, democratic set-up, better return on capital have rather
favored India score over other competing nations as a superior place for investment in
hedge funds. Investment in hedge funds is becoming more attractive investment
avenue for sophisticated investors, high net worth individuals (HNI) or families and
big institutions. They are class of investors who believe in the finance mantra – “high
risk, and higher return”. Investment in India focused hedge funds - for those with an

1

appetite for risks, most willing to take risks in anticipation of explosive reward. This
study investigates the investors’ awareness level about hedge funds as an investment
avenue and their perception towards the factors challenging the growth of hedge funds
as an investment opportunity.

LITERATURE REVIEW
The study on hedge fund has been undertaken for example by Gavin Cassar and
Joseph Gerakos (2011), Richard W. Sias and David A. Whidbee (2010), Tom Nohel,
Z. Jay Wang and Lu Zheng (2010), David J. Brophy, Paige P. Ouimet and Clemens
Sialm (2009), John M. Griffin and Jin Xu (2009), Benjamin J. Haskin, Joseph G.
Davis and Jocelyn C. Flynn (2009), Vikas Agarwal and Narayan Y. Naik(2004),
Duen-Li Kao (2002) and Simon Firth and Alix Prentice (2002).
Gavin Cassar and Joseph Gerakos (2011) investigated the extent to which hedge
fund managers smooth self-reported returns. In contrast to prior research on the
“anomalous” properties of hedge fund returns, authors observe the mechanisms used
to price the fund’s investment positions and report the fund’s performance to
investors, thereby allowing us to differentiate between asset illiquidity and
misreporting-based explanations. The researchers found that funds using less
verifiable pricing sources and funds that provide managers with greater discretion in
pricing investment positions are more likely to have returns consistent with
intentional smoothing. Traditional controls, however, such as removing the manager
from the setting and reporting of the fund’s net asset value and the use of reputable
auditors and administrators, are not associated with lower levels of smoothing. At the
end the researcher reported that with respect to asset illiquidity versus misreporting,
investment style and portfolio characteristics explain 14.0–24.3% of the variation in
our smoothing measures, and pricing controls explain an additional 4.1–8.8%,
suggesting that asset illiquidity is the major factor driving the anomalous properties of
self-reported hedge fund returns. Richard W. Sias and David A. Whidbee (2010)
attempted to examines the relation between insider (officers and directors)
transactions and trading between institutional and individual investors to better
understand what motivates insiders to trade, the role of institutional investors in
providing liquidity to insiders, and how insiders’ perception of mispricing is related to
net demand by individual investors versus institutional investors. Researchers found
that is a strong inverse relation between insider trading and institutional demand the
same quarter and over the previous year and suggested a combination of factors
contribute to this relation. First, institutional investors are more likely to provide the
liquidity necessary for insiders to trade. Second, insiders are more likely to buy low
valuation and low lag return stocks while institutions are attracted to the opposite
security characteristics. At the end the researchers concluded that insider trading is
inversely related to demand by institutional investors (and positively related to
demand by individual investors) in the same quarter and over the previous year.
Institutional investors providing liquidity to insiders and institutions’ and insiders’
attraction to opposite security characteristics account for most of these relations. Tom
Nohel, Z. Jay Wang and Lu Zheng(2010) attempted to examine situations where the
same fund manager simultaneously manages mutual funds and hedge funds.
Researchers refer to this as side-by-side management. They have documented 344
such cases involving 693 mutual funds and 538 hedge funds. Proponents of this
practice argue that it is essential to hire and retain star performers. Detractors argue
that the temptation for abuse is high, and the practice should be banned. Analysis
based on various performance metrics showed that side-by-side mutual fund managers

2

significantly outperform peer funds, consistent with this privilege being granted
primarily to star performers. Interestingly, side-by-side hedge fund managers are at
best on par with their style category peers, casting further doubt on the idea that
conflicts of interest undermine mutual fund investors. David J. Brophy, Paige P.
Ouimet and Clemens Sialm (2009) discussed Security structures, Characteristics of
PIPE(private investments in public equity) securities, Characteristics of PIPE
companies, Stock price performance, Short-term stock price performance, Long-term
stock price performance, Determinants of stock price performance, Additional
measures of long-term performance, Short interest of PIPE companies and
Performance of hedge funds that invest in PIPEs In his research paper titled research
paper titled ““Hedge Funds as Investors of Last Resort?”. This paper discusses the
role of hedge funds in private placements. At the end the researcher found that
investments by hedge funds are associated with significantly negative long run
performance of the underlying equity, even after controlling for the security type.
John M. Griffin and Jin Xu(2009) sheds some light on hedge funds in the equity
market by examining their trading intensity, their relative weights compared to the
market and mutual funds, and the types of securities they hold. Researchers have also
examined the ability of hedge fund and mutual fund aggregate holdings, changes in
holdings, and large position bets to predict the cross section of future stock returns.
Hedge fund stock picking, sector selection, and average style are compared relative to
mutual funds. Finally, they have examined differences in ability within the hedge fund
industry. Decomposing returns into three components, authors found that hedge funds
are better than mutual funds at stock picking by only 1.32% per year on a value-
weighted basis, and this result is insignificant on an equal-weighted basis or with
price-to-sales benchmarks. Hedge funds exhibit no ability to time sectors or pick
better stock styles. Surprisingly, we find only weak evidence of differential ability
between hedge funds. Overall, our study raises serious questions about the perceived
superior skill of hedge fund managers. Benjamin J. Haskin, Joseph G. Davis and
Jocelyn C. Flynn (2009) seek to examine regulatory and compliance issues for hedge
funds valuing complex assets. Within the context of hedge fund valuation, the paper
provides a general overview of: the regulatory background of hedge funds and the
central role valuation plays in the operation and regulation of such funds; relevant
cases brought by the SEC; and a discussion of valuation best practices. Hedge funds
are not ‘‘unregulated.’’ There is a body of law and accounting standards that applies
to hedge fund valuation. Nevertheless, hedge fund valuation standards are evolving in
this era of heightened regulatory scrutiny. The common concepts that have emerged
from valuation best practices will likely provide the underpinning for any regulatory
initiatives regarding hedge fund valuation. Vikas Agarwal and Narayan Y. Naik
(2004) attempted to characterize the systematic risk exposure of hedge funds using
buy-and hold and option based strategies. Results showed that a large number of
equity- oriented hedge fund strategies exhibits payoffs resembling a short position in a
put option on the market index and therefore bear a left tailed risk. At the end
researchers concluded that with the systematic risk exposure of hedge funds, recent
performance appears significantly better than long run performance. Duen-Li Kao
(2002) empirically examined whether the alphas of hedge funds and those of long-
only portfolios present different distributions and are derived from different risk
factors. The researchers discussed adjusted for return volatility differences, hedge
funds seem to offer more consistent alphas for potential transfer to either equity or
bond asset classes than do long-only portfolios- even under extreme market
conditions. Potential explanations for the findings include lack of data reliability and

3

differences between hedge funds and actively managed long-only funds in
compensation, investment constraints, and structures. Factors related to market index
returns do not adequately detect hedge funds' risk postures beyond a fund's exposure
to the market-directional risk of standard asset classes. Risk factors derived from asset
prices in financial markets do provide timely and systematic descriptions of the risks
underlying trading strategies used by hedge funds. The multifactor style-risk analysis
can effectively monitor a hedge fund's exposure to systematic versus idiosyncratic
risks and volatility-risk factors over time. Hung-Gay Fung, Xiaoqing Eleanor Xu,
Jot Yau(2002) examined the performance of 115 global equity-based hedge funds
with reference to their target geographical markets in the seven-year period 1994-
2000. Several results are noteworthy. First, global hedge fund managers do not show
positive market-timing ability but do demonstrate superior security-selection ability;
the Jensen's alphas we found, before and after controlling for market timing, are
sizable and positive. Second, incentive fees and leverage both have a significant
positive impact on a hedge fund's risk-adjusted return (as demonstrated by Sharpe
ratios and Jensen's alphas) but not on a fund’s "selectivity index" (i.e., its performance
after controlling for market-timing effects). Third, incentive fees can lower the hedge
fund’s up-market and down-market systematic risk. Fourth, the size of a hedge fund is
consistently related to its return performance. Finally, contrary to the general
perception, leverage does not significantly affect the systematic risk of hedge funds.
Simon Firth and Alix Prentice (2002) discussed important issues related to hedge
funds in his paper titled “Legal and regulatory protections for hedge fund
investors”. A common perception is that, as investors in hedge funds are afforded a
lesser level of legal and regulatory protections than investors in regulated products,
there is a deficiency in the degree of transparency and disclosure afforded to them.
This paper examines from a largely UK perspective whether that is, in practice, the
case.

Research objective:
To analyze the awareness level about Hedge Funds as an investment avenue
among the investor community of Gujarat
To study the investor’s perception towards the benefits of investing into hedge
funds
To study the investor’s perception towards the factors that challenges the growth
of Hedge Funds

Hypothesis of the study
There is no association between the Age of the investors and the Awareness for the
Hedge Funds.
There is no association between the Education of the investors and the Awareness
of the Hedge Funds.
Investors’ give equal ratings to the advantages associated with hedge funds.
Investors give equal ratings to the factors that challenge the growth of Hedge
Funds in India.
Methodology
This is an analytical study based on the primary data collected through scientifically
developed questionnaire. The questionnaire has been personally administered on
sample size of 246, chosen on a convenient basis from the cities of Gujarat state. A
literature review was undertaken to identify what parameters to consider in research.
It outlines the previous research with respect to customer satisfaction, awareness in

4

the industry. Second, in-depth interviews were held with customers to establish the
evaluation criteria and the factors which result in customer satisfaction. Third, a
questionnaire was constructed and piloted. Questionnaire was prepared keeping in
mind the various outcomes possible. Care was taken to minimize the possibility of
wrong interpretation and biased views. The five-point likert scale was used to analyze
the different variables and their relationship. For the analysis of data statistical
methods are applied with the aid of SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science)
software, version 16.0 and excel. Sample size was determined using following
formula.

Here Z = 1.96, p = 0.20, q = 0.80, d = 0.05,

n = 245.8624 ≈ 246

Sample
The population comprised investors as defined in similar studied in literature. A
convenience sampling procedure was used on a sample of 246 respondents. The
population of this study was investors of major cities of Gujarat.
Characterstics of the sample
Category Frequency
18-23 46
24-29 63
30-35 49
Age
35-40 41
40+ 47
Total 246
10,000-20,000 58
20,001-30,000 73
Monthly Income 30,001-40,000 41
40,000+ 74
Total 246
Student 33
Professional 109
Businessman 27
Occupation Housewife 17
Govt. employee 32
Others 28
Total 246
Undergraduate 8
Graduate 78
Education Level
Postgraduate 160
Total 246
Male 183
Gender Female 63
Total 246

5

Findings and Analysis
1. Hedge funds are same as Mutual Funds was not believed by majority of the
investors.
2. Looking at the various Advantages of Hedge Funds, investors rated highly for the
advantage of Potential to adopt various Tactics & Strategies, wherein investors
responded between BELEVE and STRONGLY BELIEVE.
3. Looking at the various Challenges that hamper the Growth of Hedge Funds In
India, challenges namely SEBI Regulations, Lack of awareness about Hedge
Funds, Misperceptions about Hedge Funds, Lack of standard Hedge Fund Indices
in India and Lack of transparency and secretive nature of Hedge Funds were
highly rated by the investors.
4. Out of the respondents who were AWARE about the Hedge Funds, 62.3%
believed that Hedge Funds are NOT better option than Mutual Funds.
5. Out of the total 61 respondents, who were AWARE about Hedge Funds, 39
respondents, i.e. 63.9% respondents agreed to invest in Hedge Funds, if they were
an Accredited Investors.
6. 34.4% respondents would invest about 10 to 20% of their total value of the
portfolio in Hedge Funds, followed by 20 to 30% of their portfolio by other 16.4%
respondents.
7. 42.6% of the respondents would like to be stay invested in Hedge Funds for 1 to 3
years
8. 26.2% respondents expected 30 to 40% returns per annum from the investment
they have made in Hedge Funds.
9. From those who were not AWARE about Hedge Funds, majority of them were
eager to know about it and found the concept interesting.

Hypothesis testing:
1. Awareness towards hedge funds and Age
Cross tabulation:
Are you aware about hedge funds? * Age

Age Total
18-23 24-29 30-34 35-40 40+
8 26 12 4 11 61
Awar

17.4 41.3 24.5 9.8 23.4 24.8
e

% % % % % %
38 37 37 37 36 185
Awar
Not

82.6 58.7 75.5 90.2 76.6 75.2
e

% % % % % %
46 63 49 41 47 246
Total

100 100 100 100 100 100
% % % % % %

6

Chi-Square Test

Asymp.
Value df
Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-
15.546 4 0.004
Square
Likelihood Ratio 15.737 4 0.003
Linear-by-Linear
1.372 1 0.241
Association
N of Valid Cases 246
a. = 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is 10.17

It can be inferred from the above table that there is a Strong association between the
Age of the investors and the Awareness for the Hedge Funds. The Asymptotic
Significant value is 0.004, which is less than 0.05; this means that the H0 is rejected.

2. Awareness towards hedge funds*Education
Cross tabulation
Are you aware about hedge funds? * Education

Education Total
UG Grad PG
Ye 2 17 42 61
Aware

s 25.0% 21.8% 26.3% 24.8%
No 6 61 118 185
75.0% 78.2% 73.8% 75.2%
8 78 160 246
100% 100% 100% 100%

Chi-Square Test

Asymp.
Value df
Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .558(a) 2 .756
Likelihood Ratio .567 2 .753
Linear-by-Linear
.384 1 .535
Association
N of Valid Cases 246
a = 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is 1.98.

It can be inferred from the above table that there is NO association between the
Education of the investors and the Awareness for the Hedge Funds. The Asymptotic
Significant value is 0.756, which is more than 0.05; this means that the H0 is not
rejected

7

3. Investors’ give equal ratings to the advantages associated with hedge funds

Sig. 2-
Advantages 0.05
tailed
Potential for positive returns 0.027 < 0.05
Potential to adopt various
0.199 > 0.05
Tactics & Strategies
Minimum volatility risk 0.000 < 0.05
Enhance portfolio
0.000 < 0.05
efficiency and diversification
Alignment of manager
0.001 < 0.05
goals with investors’ goals
Investment in all
0.000 < 0.05
possible avenues
Provide liquidity
0.000 < 0.05
to the market

Most of all the investors give different weightage to the different advantages
associated with hedge funds.

4. Investors give equal ratings to the factors that challenge the growth of Hedge
Funds in Indi

Prospective Advancement Sig. 2
0.05
of HEDGE FUNDS tailed
SEBI providing a Registered & Regulated
0.139 > 0.05
platform to HEDGE FUNDS
HEDGE FUNDS Companies will Increase in
0.008 < 0.05
Size and Offerings
Greater Increase in the Number of HEDGE
0.009 < 0.05
FUNDS playing in the market
Reduced HEDGE FUNDS Fees and Cost,
0.000 < 0.05
against higher returns
More Powerful & Reliable Indices providing
0.210 > 0.05
the accurate data
Improved Transparency in terms of Capital
0.282 > 0.05
Structure, Strategies adopted
Enhanced investor’s Liquidity & Willingness
0.788 > 0.05
to invest In HEDGE FUND
Increase in the level of Awareness about
0.013 < 0.05
HEDGE FUNDS in public

From the above test it can be seen that the null hypothesis is rejected and alternate
hypothesis is not rejected for 4 factors while means that the majority of the
Investors’ responded that they are neutral about the following factors that are the
prospects of Hedge Funds in India namely hedge funds Companies will Increase in
Size and Offerings, Greater Increase in the Number of hedge funds playing in the
market, Reduced hedge funds Fees and Cost, against higher returns and Increase in
the level of Awareness about hedge funds in public. They believe and strongly

8

believed about the following factors that are the prospects of Hedge Funds in India
namely, SEBI providing a Registered & Regulated platform to hedge funds, More
Powerful & Reliable Indices providing the accurate data, Improved Transparency in
terms of Capital Structure, Strategies adopted and Enhanced investor’s Liquidity &
Willingness to invest In hedge fund.
Limitations of research and Future research directions
The present study is based on a moderate sample size and areas covered are major
cities of Gujarat state therefore the results of this study cannot be generalized. The
total sample size was 246 useable questionnaires, after disaggregation into the
demographic categories, a few of subgroups were small in number. For example, the
sample is skewed to a particular gender with 75 Percent of the respondents being
male. Future researcher could make several extensions of the current study. As
mentioned above the research is just a small step in understanding the constructs of
Investor’s awareness and their perception. The causal relationships between the two
have not been investigated. Future research could examine a wider respondent base
across the States of India with more diversified sample in the research. Future
researchers could use quota sampling across the different income groups, gender and
age categories. Hedge fund is such as a wide area of research that no single study can
cover different dimensions related to it. Even primary surveys for studying the
perceptions of investors towards hedge funds time to time is not a regular feature in
India, Hence there is much potential of research on a bigger scale covering wider
area.

CONCLUSIONS

The awareness level regarding hedge funds is very less in area covered for study. The
investors are not aware of the advantage that they can get by investing in hedge funds
nor are they aware of the basic functioning of hedge funds. Investors in Gujarat prefer
to invest in government securities and fixed deposits of nationalize banks were they
can have complete safety of their funds though they get less returns. The investors
willing to take risk invest in equity markets, land, gold etc. Access to financial
consultant for the management of the funds is costly so very few investors prefer to
have their own financial consultant for the management of their funds. Investors
generally see the past performance of the funds for investing their money in it which
is not the right way to analyze the funds portfolio.

REFERENCES

• Benjamin J. Haskin, J. G. (2009), “Under the microscope: valuation and hedge
funds”, Journal of Investment Compliance Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 5-25.
• David J. Brophy, P. P. ((2009)). “Hedge Funds as Investors of Last Resort?”.
The Review of Financial Studies / Vol 22 No. 2 .
• Gerakos, G. C. (2011), “Hedge Funds: Pricing Controls and the Smoothing of
Self-reported Returns”, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 00, No. 00, pp.
1-37.
• Kao, D.L. (2002), “Battle for Alphas: Hedge Funds versus Long-Only
Portfolios” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp.16-36.
• Naik, V. A. (2004), “Risk and portfolio Decisions involving hedge funds”,
The review of Financial Studies, Vol.17, No.1, pp.63-98

9

• Prentice S. F. (2002), “Legal and regulatory protections for hedge fund
investors”, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 10, No. 4,
pp. 336–340
• Tom Nohel, Z. J. (2010), “Side-by-Side Management of Hedge Funds and
Mutual Funds”, The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 2342-
2373.
• Whidbee, R. W(2010), “Insider Trades and Demand by Institutional and
Individual Investors” , The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 23 No. 4, pp.
1544-1595.
• Xu, J. M (2009), “How Smart Are the Smart Guys? A Unique View from
Hedge Fund Stock Holdings”, The Review of Financial Studies vol. 22, No. 7,
pp.2531-2570

10

An analytical study on investors’ awareness and perception

More Related Content

What's hot (16)

Viewers also liked (13)

Similar to An analytical study on investors’ awareness and perception (20)

More from iaemedu (20)

An analytical study on investors’ awareness and perception