 
1
-Sapate P D, 
Student(ABW/34/2011), 
Lokmangal Agril biotech college, 
Wadala. 
2
INTRODUCTION 
 
 Antisense RNA is a single-stranded RNA that is 
complementary to a messenger RNA (mRNA) strand 
transcribed within a cell 
 Antisense RNA introduced into a cell to inhibit 
translation of a complementary mRNA by base 
pairing to it and creating barrier to the translation 
machinery. 
 E.g. 
hok/sok system of the E. coli R1 plasmid. 
3
 
 This translational arrest causes reduced amount of 
protein expression. 
 Well-known examples of GM plants produced by 
this technology- 
The Flavr Savr tomato , 
Two cultivars of ring spot-resistant papaya. 
4 
After 45 days….
General outline 
 
5
Diff. between antisense 
technology & RNAi 
 
 The intended effect in both will be same i.e. gene 
silencing but the processing is little but different. 
 Antisense technology degrades RNA by enzymes 
RNaseH while RNAi employed the enzyme DICER 
to degrade the m RNA. 
 RNAi are twice larger than the antisense 
oligonucleotide. 
6
HISTORY 
 
 First time at “ free university of Amsterdam”, used 
antisense RNA technology against the gene 
determining flower color of petunia . 
 Antisense effect first demonstrated by zemencnick & 
Stephenson in 1970 on “Rous sarcoma virus”. 
 First time antisense oligonucleotides are synthesized 
by Eckstein and colleagues. 
7
 
 In 1995 Guo and Kemp hues: 
injection of either antisense or sense RNAs in the 
germ line of C. elegans was equally effective at 
silencing homologous target genes. 
8
Nature’s antisense system 
 
 There is HOK(host killing)/SOK(suppress killing) system 
in R1 plasmid in E.Coli. 
 when E. coli cell undergoes division , daughter cell inherit 
hok gene & sok gene from parent. But due to short life of 
cell, the sok gene is get degraded. So in normal cell, hok 
gene get over expressed & cell get die. 
 But when R1 plasmid is get inherited , it having the sok 
gene & sok promoter. 
 Then it transcripts sok gene & it is get overexpressed 
against hok gene. 
9
HOW VIRUS REPLICATE ? 
 
10
MECHANISM 
 
 In this technique, Short segments of single stranded 
RNA are introduced. 
 These oligonucleotides are complementary to the 
mRNA, which physically bind to the mRNA. 
 So , they block the expression of particular gene. 
 In case of viruses, antisense oligonucleotides inhibit 
viral replication with blocking expression of 
integrated proviral genes. 
 Usually consist of 15–20 nucleotides. 
11
 
 Translation of mRNA may be blocked by two 
possible mechanisms , These are:- 
1] by base specific hybridization – which prevents 
access by translation machinery i.e. “hybridization 
arrest”. 
2] by forming RNA/DNA duplex which is 
recognized by nuclease RNaseH , specific for digesting 
RNA in an RNA/DNA duplex. 
12
 
 RNaseH is a non-specific endonuclease, catalyzes the 
cleavage of RNA via hydrolytic mechanism. 
 RNaseH has ribonuclease activity cleaves the 3’-O-P 
bond of RNA in a DNA/RNA duplex. 
13
 
 Unique DNA sequence 
 Efficient cellular uptake 
 Minimal nonspecific binding 
 Target specific hybridization 
 Non-toxic antisense construct 
14 
Characteristics of antisense 
oligonucleotides
 
 The antisense technology can be modified in THREE 
modes because of chemical modifications of the 
oligonucleotides. 
 These modes are due to activation of RNaseH & 
internucleotides linkages which do not activate 
enzyme. 
15 
Approaches
 
 The antisense oligonucleotides binds the target 
sequence causing both “hybridisation arrest ” & 
“RNaseH activation”. 
 Degradation of mRNA by RNaseH results into 
release of oligonucleotides. 
 They may bind to other copies of target mRNA. 
 These oligonucleotides are also susceptible to other 
nucleases. 
 This a major parameter affecting catalytic mode of 
degradation. 
16 
1st approach
 
 In this, antisense oligonucleotides binds to target 
sequence result in translation arrest but they do not 
activate enzyme RNaseH. 
 Oligoribonucleotides & there analogues , 
oligodeoxyribonucleotides , various non phosphate 
& phosphate internucleotides linkages fall in this 
category. 
 They show resistance against nucleuses enzyme and 
never get degraded by them. 
17 
2nd approach
 
 They also show effective translational arrest . 
 But the major problem is that they are generally 
required higher molar concentrations than those 
which activate RNaseH. 
18
 
 It combines features of both previous approaches. 
 They contains both internucleotides linkages which 
are responsible for RNaseH activation & which 
shows resistance against them. 
 Digestion of mRNA target in RNA-DNA duplex 
releases oligonucleotides which are resistance 
against nuclease enzyme, hence are more effective 
than oligonucleotides in 1st approach. 
19 
3rd approach
 
 They may form hybrids of 
oligodeoxyribonucleotides & Oligoribonucleotides. 
 The antiviral activity of an antisense oligonucleotides 
depends usually on specific binding to a target 
nucleic acid. 
20
 
Over view 
21
 
 Thomas and coworkers coined the term ‘ribozymes’. 
 These are RNA molecules which have catalytic 
activity which degrade nucleotides . 
 Ribozyme Bind to the target RNA moiety and 
inactivate it by cleaving the phosphodiester 
backbone at a specific cutting site. 
 Ribozyme destroy RNA that carries the massage of 
disease. 
 These are effectively used against HIV virus. 
22 
Ribozymes
 
23 
Mechanism of ribozyme
APPLICATION 
 
1. Flavr Savr tomato-antisense 
RNA used against an enzyme 
polygalacturonase, an softening enzyme which is responsible 
for ripening. 
2. Transgenic ACMV-resistant cassava plants* – 
Used against African cassava mosaic virus 
(ACMV) which causes cassava mosaic disease causing major 
economic loss in Africa. 
3. Formivirsen-is 
the first antiviral drug developed against CMV. 
24
 
25 
Antisense as drug
conclusion 
 
 Antisense technology shows potential for diverse 
application to field of basic research & therapy. 
 One of the most approved approaches for inactivating a 
single specific gene. 
 But it may sometime give undesirable effect. 
 Generally , antisense RNA still lack effective design, 
biological activity, and efficient route of administration. 
 Antisense technologies form a very powerful weapon for 
studying gene function and for discovering more specific 
treatments of disease. 
26
 
 Attempts are made to genetically engineer transgenic 
plants to express antisense RNA instead activate the 
RNAi pathway, although the processes result in 
“gene silencing”. 
27
References :- 
 
 A textbook of biotechnology 2nd edition by H. D. 
Kumar 
www.youtube.com 
 Nature biotechnology. 
 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.com (PubMed ID 17173627)* 
www.google.com 
28
 
Queries ? 
(If any) 
29
 
THANKs FOR YOUR 
KIND ATTENSION 
30

Antisense RNA technology

  • 1.
  • 2.
    -Sapate P D, Student(ABW/34/2011), Lokmangal Agril biotech college, Wadala. 2
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION  Antisense RNA is a single-stranded RNA that is complementary to a messenger RNA (mRNA) strand transcribed within a cell  Antisense RNA introduced into a cell to inhibit translation of a complementary mRNA by base pairing to it and creating barrier to the translation machinery.  E.g. hok/sok system of the E. coli R1 plasmid. 3
  • 4.
      Thistranslational arrest causes reduced amount of protein expression.  Well-known examples of GM plants produced by this technology- The Flavr Savr tomato , Two cultivars of ring spot-resistant papaya. 4 After 45 days….
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Diff. between antisense technology & RNAi   The intended effect in both will be same i.e. gene silencing but the processing is little but different.  Antisense technology degrades RNA by enzymes RNaseH while RNAi employed the enzyme DICER to degrade the m RNA.  RNAi are twice larger than the antisense oligonucleotide. 6
  • 7.
    HISTORY  First time at “ free university of Amsterdam”, used antisense RNA technology against the gene determining flower color of petunia .  Antisense effect first demonstrated by zemencnick & Stephenson in 1970 on “Rous sarcoma virus”.  First time antisense oligonucleotides are synthesized by Eckstein and colleagues. 7
  • 8.
      In1995 Guo and Kemp hues: injection of either antisense or sense RNAs in the germ line of C. elegans was equally effective at silencing homologous target genes. 8
  • 9.
    Nature’s antisense system   There is HOK(host killing)/SOK(suppress killing) system in R1 plasmid in E.Coli.  when E. coli cell undergoes division , daughter cell inherit hok gene & sok gene from parent. But due to short life of cell, the sok gene is get degraded. So in normal cell, hok gene get over expressed & cell get die.  But when R1 plasmid is get inherited , it having the sok gene & sok promoter.  Then it transcripts sok gene & it is get overexpressed against hok gene. 9
  • 10.
  • 11.
    MECHANISM  In this technique, Short segments of single stranded RNA are introduced.  These oligonucleotides are complementary to the mRNA, which physically bind to the mRNA.  So , they block the expression of particular gene.  In case of viruses, antisense oligonucleotides inhibit viral replication with blocking expression of integrated proviral genes.  Usually consist of 15–20 nucleotides. 11
  • 12.
      Translationof mRNA may be blocked by two possible mechanisms , These are:- 1] by base specific hybridization – which prevents access by translation machinery i.e. “hybridization arrest”. 2] by forming RNA/DNA duplex which is recognized by nuclease RNaseH , specific for digesting RNA in an RNA/DNA duplex. 12
  • 13.
      RNaseHis a non-specific endonuclease, catalyzes the cleavage of RNA via hydrolytic mechanism.  RNaseH has ribonuclease activity cleaves the 3’-O-P bond of RNA in a DNA/RNA duplex. 13
  • 14.
      UniqueDNA sequence  Efficient cellular uptake  Minimal nonspecific binding  Target specific hybridization  Non-toxic antisense construct 14 Characteristics of antisense oligonucleotides
  • 15.
      Theantisense technology can be modified in THREE modes because of chemical modifications of the oligonucleotides.  These modes are due to activation of RNaseH & internucleotides linkages which do not activate enzyme. 15 Approaches
  • 16.
      Theantisense oligonucleotides binds the target sequence causing both “hybridisation arrest ” & “RNaseH activation”.  Degradation of mRNA by RNaseH results into release of oligonucleotides.  They may bind to other copies of target mRNA.  These oligonucleotides are also susceptible to other nucleases.  This a major parameter affecting catalytic mode of degradation. 16 1st approach
  • 17.
      Inthis, antisense oligonucleotides binds to target sequence result in translation arrest but they do not activate enzyme RNaseH.  Oligoribonucleotides & there analogues , oligodeoxyribonucleotides , various non phosphate & phosphate internucleotides linkages fall in this category.  They show resistance against nucleuses enzyme and never get degraded by them. 17 2nd approach
  • 18.
      Theyalso show effective translational arrest .  But the major problem is that they are generally required higher molar concentrations than those which activate RNaseH. 18
  • 19.
      Itcombines features of both previous approaches.  They contains both internucleotides linkages which are responsible for RNaseH activation & which shows resistance against them.  Digestion of mRNA target in RNA-DNA duplex releases oligonucleotides which are resistance against nuclease enzyme, hence are more effective than oligonucleotides in 1st approach. 19 3rd approach
  • 20.
      Theymay form hybrids of oligodeoxyribonucleotides & Oligoribonucleotides.  The antiviral activity of an antisense oligonucleotides depends usually on specific binding to a target nucleic acid. 20
  • 21.
  • 22.
      Thomasand coworkers coined the term ‘ribozymes’.  These are RNA molecules which have catalytic activity which degrade nucleotides .  Ribozyme Bind to the target RNA moiety and inactivate it by cleaving the phosphodiester backbone at a specific cutting site.  Ribozyme destroy RNA that carries the massage of disease.  These are effectively used against HIV virus. 22 Ribozymes
  • 23.
     23 Mechanismof ribozyme
  • 24.
    APPLICATION  1.Flavr Savr tomato-antisense RNA used against an enzyme polygalacturonase, an softening enzyme which is responsible for ripening. 2. Transgenic ACMV-resistant cassava plants* – Used against African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) which causes cassava mosaic disease causing major economic loss in Africa. 3. Formivirsen-is the first antiviral drug developed against CMV. 24
  • 25.
  • 26.
    conclusion  Antisense technology shows potential for diverse application to field of basic research & therapy.  One of the most approved approaches for inactivating a single specific gene.  But it may sometime give undesirable effect.  Generally , antisense RNA still lack effective design, biological activity, and efficient route of administration.  Antisense technologies form a very powerful weapon for studying gene function and for discovering more specific treatments of disease. 26
  • 27.
      Attemptsare made to genetically engineer transgenic plants to express antisense RNA instead activate the RNAi pathway, although the processes result in “gene silencing”. 27
  • 28.
    References :-   A textbook of biotechnology 2nd edition by H. D. Kumar www.youtube.com  Nature biotechnology.  www.ncbi.nlm.nih.com (PubMed ID 17173627)* www.google.com 28
  • 29.
     Queries ? (If any) 29
  • 30.
     THANKs FORYOUR KIND ATTENSION 30