Approach & management (11/09/2018)
Dr. Asif Mian Ansari
DNB resident
Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mohali
Punjab
Moderator: Dr. Gaurav
Kaushal
 Inflammation of appendix
 All layers of colon
 Additionally B & T lymphocytes in mucosa &
submucosa IgA GALS
 Main precipitating factor is obstruction of
lumen
 Fecalith, lymphoid hyperplasia, calculi, infections,
benign or malignant tumors and paracites in
endemic regions
 Obstruction  rise in intraluminal pressure
 obstruction of venous outflow & lymphatic
stasis engorgement of appendix 
appendicular walls ischemia & necrosis 
bacterial overgrowth  neutrophils
infiltration  invasion of walls  perforation
 localised peritonitis and abscess formation
 Age : 2nd
and 3rd
decade most common
 Migratory right lower quadrant abdominal
pain
 Anorexia
 Nausea & vomiting
 Non specific symptoms like fever,
Indigestion, Flatulence, Bowel irregularity,
Diarrhea, Generalized malaise etc.
 Symptmes may vary according to tip position
Inflamed anterior appendix:
Marked pain & tenderness
in RIF
Inflamed retrocaecal
appendix:
Dull aching pain
Inflamed pelvic appendix:
Tenderness at McBurney’s
point , increased urinary
frequency, dysuria and
rectal symptoms
 Elevated temperature and tachycardia
 Per abdomen findings:
 Tenderness in RIF region
 Rebound tenderness
 Guarding & rigidity
 Accessory signs:
▪ Rovsing sign
▪ Dunphy sign
▪ Obturator sign
▪ Psoas sign
 Leukocytosis (80%) with shift to left
 Mild hyperbilirubinemia
 Raised C- reactive protein
 Modified Alvarado score
 Score </= 3 appendicitis unlikely
 Score 4-6 needs further evaluation
 Score >/= 7 appendicitis (78%)
1 point 2 points
Migratory right lower quadrant pain Tenderness in the right lower quadrant
Anorexia
Leukocytosis of white blood cell count
>10 x 109
/liter
Nausea or vomiting
Fever >37.5°C (>99.5°F)
Rebound tenderness in the right lower
quadrant
 Imaging techniques for acute appendicitis:
 CT scan:
 Preferred imaging, imaging features are:
▪ Enlarged appendiceal dilatation (>6 mm)
▪ Appendiceal wall thickening (>2 mm)
▪ Periappendiceal fat stranding
▪ Appendiceal wall enhancement
▪ Appendicolith
 Normal appendix and appedicitis in CT scan
 Ultrasonography : preferred in children and
pregnancy or if CT is not rapidly available
 Findings are:
▪ Noncompressible appendix with double-wall thickness
diameter of >6 mm
▪ Probe tenderness with compression
▪ Appendicolith
▪ Increased echogenicity of inflamed periappendiceal fat
▪ Fluid in the right lower quadrant
 Normal appendix and acute appendicitis on
USG
 Magnetic resonance imaging: preferred in
pregnancy.
 Findings are comparable to CT
  Advantages Disadvantages
US
No ionizing radiation Lower diagnostic accuracy than CT or MRI
Widely available, including at the bedside
Operator-dependent variability in
diagnostic performance
High rates of indeterminate exams with
50 to 85% of normal appendices not
visualized
CT
High diagnostic accuracy Ionizing radiation
Lowest rates of indeterminate exams with
80 to 90% of normal appendix visualized
Intravenous iodinated contrast needed for
optimum diagnostic performance
MRI
No ionizing radiation Limited availability
High diagnostic accuracy
Requires patient lie still in an enclosed
scanner for 10 to 30 minutes
Moderates rates of nondiagnostic exams
with 20 to 30% normal appendices not
visualized
 Test performance for diagnosis of
appendicitis
Test Sensitivity Specificity
WBC 0.84 (0.73 to 0.92) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.81)
CRP 0.81 (0.74 to 0.87) 0.54 (0.42 to 0.64)
WBC & CRP 0.93 (0.86 to 1.00) 0.62 (0.37 to 0.86)
CT 0.96 (0.95 to 0.97) 0.96 (0.93 to 0.97)
US 0.85 (0.79 to 0.90) 0.90 (0.83 to 0.95)
MRI 0.95 (0.88 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95)
 Appendix without pathological evidence of
acute inflammation
 Decreased in last 10 years
•Nonperforated appendicitis
•Perforated appendicitis
 Appendicitis without clinical or radiographic
signs of perforation (eg, inflammatory mass,
phlegmon, or abscess)
 Timely appendectomy is recommended by :
 American College of Surgeons
 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
 Society of American Gastrointestinal and
Endoscopic Surgeons
 European Association of Endoscopic Surgery
 World Society of Emergency Surgery
 Antibiotics are only for augmentation of
surgery
 Nonoperative treatment: favourable evidences from 6 RCTs
 Conclusions :
 Patients treated with antibiotics have lower or
similar pain scores, require fewer doses of
narcotics, have a quicker return to work and do
not have a higher perforation rate
 90 percent of patients treated successfully with
antibiotics, 10 % non responders require surgery
 70% patients are able to avoid surgery during the
first year
 Issues about non-operative treatment:
 Preoperative abdominal CT cannot reliably
distinguish uncomplicated appendicitis from
complicated disease. False negative CT will cause
increased morbidity due to nonsurgical
management
 Patient with fecaliths have higher complication
rates nonsurgical treatment is not
recommended
 Nonoperative management poses a greater risk
for patients who are older, immunocompromised,
or have medical comorbidities
 These groups of patients were excluded from
trials  efficacy of non operative treatment is
unknown
 Standard treatment for appendicitis is
appendectomy; either open or laparoscopic
 Timing of appendectomy:
 Patients are acutely ill and have significant
dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities
 Pain is localised to RLQ (if walled off by
omentum) or diffused (if generalized
peritonitis )
 On imaging, contained perforation
(phlegmon), abscess or rarely free
perforation may be seen
 12-20% of all acute appendicitis cases
 Stable patients : immediate surgery versus
initial non operative treatment
 Stable patients with abscess antibiotics
and image guided drainage of abscess
 Responders  7-10 days antibiotic treatment
and to be followed up after 6-8 weeks
 Stable patients with phlegmon (Lump)
 Ochsner-Sherren regimen
 Rescue appendectomy for non responders
 Rising temperature/pulse
 Increased size of lump
 Abscess formation
 Antibiotics choice:
 carbepenems, piperacillin-tazobactum or
ticarcilline-clavulanate are single-agent regimen
 Cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefazoline, cefotaxime
or ciprofloxacin is used with metronidazole
 Amikacin or vancomycin may be added for
enterococcal coverage
 Follow up after 6-8 weeks
 Colonoscopy (if age >40 years)
 Interval appendectomy
 Prevents recurrent appendicitis
 excludes appendiceal neoplasms
Appendicitis
Appendicitis

Appendicitis

  • 1.
    Approach & management(11/09/2018) Dr. Asif Mian Ansari DNB resident Max Superspeciality Hospital, Mohali Punjab Moderator: Dr. Gaurav Kaushal
  • 2.
     Inflammation ofappendix  All layers of colon  Additionally B & T lymphocytes in mucosa & submucosa IgA GALS  Main precipitating factor is obstruction of lumen  Fecalith, lymphoid hyperplasia, calculi, infections, benign or malignant tumors and paracites in endemic regions
  • 3.
     Obstruction rise in intraluminal pressure  obstruction of venous outflow & lymphatic stasis engorgement of appendix  appendicular walls ischemia & necrosis  bacterial overgrowth  neutrophils infiltration  invasion of walls  perforation  localised peritonitis and abscess formation
  • 4.
     Age :2nd and 3rd decade most common  Migratory right lower quadrant abdominal pain  Anorexia  Nausea & vomiting  Non specific symptoms like fever, Indigestion, Flatulence, Bowel irregularity, Diarrhea, Generalized malaise etc.  Symptmes may vary according to tip position
  • 5.
    Inflamed anterior appendix: Markedpain & tenderness in RIF Inflamed retrocaecal appendix: Dull aching pain Inflamed pelvic appendix: Tenderness at McBurney’s point , increased urinary frequency, dysuria and rectal symptoms
  • 6.
     Elevated temperatureand tachycardia  Per abdomen findings:  Tenderness in RIF region  Rebound tenderness  Guarding & rigidity  Accessory signs: ▪ Rovsing sign ▪ Dunphy sign ▪ Obturator sign ▪ Psoas sign
  • 7.
     Leukocytosis (80%)with shift to left  Mild hyperbilirubinemia  Raised C- reactive protein
  • 8.
     Modified Alvaradoscore  Score </= 3 appendicitis unlikely  Score 4-6 needs further evaluation  Score >/= 7 appendicitis (78%) 1 point 2 points Migratory right lower quadrant pain Tenderness in the right lower quadrant Anorexia Leukocytosis of white blood cell count >10 x 109 /liter Nausea or vomiting Fever >37.5°C (>99.5°F) Rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant
  • 9.
     Imaging techniquesfor acute appendicitis:  CT scan:  Preferred imaging, imaging features are: ▪ Enlarged appendiceal dilatation (>6 mm) ▪ Appendiceal wall thickening (>2 mm) ▪ Periappendiceal fat stranding ▪ Appendiceal wall enhancement ▪ Appendicolith
  • 10.
     Normal appendixand appedicitis in CT scan
  • 11.
     Ultrasonography :preferred in children and pregnancy or if CT is not rapidly available  Findings are: ▪ Noncompressible appendix with double-wall thickness diameter of >6 mm ▪ Probe tenderness with compression ▪ Appendicolith ▪ Increased echogenicity of inflamed periappendiceal fat ▪ Fluid in the right lower quadrant
  • 12.
     Normal appendixand acute appendicitis on USG
  • 13.
     Magnetic resonanceimaging: preferred in pregnancy.  Findings are comparable to CT
  • 14.
      Advantages Disadvantages US Noionizing radiation Lower diagnostic accuracy than CT or MRI Widely available, including at the bedside Operator-dependent variability in diagnostic performance High rates of indeterminate exams with 50 to 85% of normal appendices not visualized CT High diagnostic accuracy Ionizing radiation Lowest rates of indeterminate exams with 80 to 90% of normal appendix visualized Intravenous iodinated contrast needed for optimum diagnostic performance MRI No ionizing radiation Limited availability High diagnostic accuracy Requires patient lie still in an enclosed scanner for 10 to 30 minutes Moderates rates of nondiagnostic exams with 20 to 30% normal appendices not visualized
  • 15.
     Test performancefor diagnosis of appendicitis Test Sensitivity Specificity WBC 0.84 (0.73 to 0.92) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.81) CRP 0.81 (0.74 to 0.87) 0.54 (0.42 to 0.64) WBC & CRP 0.93 (0.86 to 1.00) 0.62 (0.37 to 0.86) CT 0.96 (0.95 to 0.97) 0.96 (0.93 to 0.97) US 0.85 (0.79 to 0.90) 0.90 (0.83 to 0.95) MRI 0.95 (0.88 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95)
  • 17.
     Appendix withoutpathological evidence of acute inflammation  Decreased in last 10 years
  • 18.
  • 19.
     Appendicitis withoutclinical or radiographic signs of perforation (eg, inflammatory mass, phlegmon, or abscess)  Timely appendectomy is recommended by :  American College of Surgeons  Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract  Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
  • 20.
     European Associationof Endoscopic Surgery  World Society of Emergency Surgery  Antibiotics are only for augmentation of surgery
  • 21.
     Nonoperative treatment:favourable evidences from 6 RCTs
  • 22.
     Conclusions : Patients treated with antibiotics have lower or similar pain scores, require fewer doses of narcotics, have a quicker return to work and do not have a higher perforation rate  90 percent of patients treated successfully with antibiotics, 10 % non responders require surgery  70% patients are able to avoid surgery during the first year
  • 23.
     Issues aboutnon-operative treatment:  Preoperative abdominal CT cannot reliably distinguish uncomplicated appendicitis from complicated disease. False negative CT will cause increased morbidity due to nonsurgical management  Patient with fecaliths have higher complication rates nonsurgical treatment is not recommended
  • 24.
     Nonoperative managementposes a greater risk for patients who are older, immunocompromised, or have medical comorbidities  These groups of patients were excluded from trials  efficacy of non operative treatment is unknown
  • 25.
     Standard treatmentfor appendicitis is appendectomy; either open or laparoscopic  Timing of appendectomy:
  • 26.
     Patients areacutely ill and have significant dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities  Pain is localised to RLQ (if walled off by omentum) or diffused (if generalized peritonitis )  On imaging, contained perforation (phlegmon), abscess or rarely free perforation may be seen  12-20% of all acute appendicitis cases
  • 27.
     Stable patients: immediate surgery versus initial non operative treatment
  • 28.
     Stable patientswith abscess antibiotics and image guided drainage of abscess  Responders  7-10 days antibiotic treatment and to be followed up after 6-8 weeks
  • 29.
     Stable patientswith phlegmon (Lump)  Ochsner-Sherren regimen  Rescue appendectomy for non responders  Rising temperature/pulse  Increased size of lump  Abscess formation
  • 30.
     Antibiotics choice: carbepenems, piperacillin-tazobactum or ticarcilline-clavulanate are single-agent regimen  Cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefazoline, cefotaxime or ciprofloxacin is used with metronidazole  Amikacin or vancomycin may be added for enterococcal coverage
  • 31.
     Follow upafter 6-8 weeks  Colonoscopy (if age >40 years)  Interval appendectomy  Prevents recurrent appendicitis  excludes appendiceal neoplasms