SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Chapter 7: Deadlocks
7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Chapter 7: Deadlocks
● The Deadlock Problem
● System Model
● Deadlock Characterization
● Methods for Handling Deadlocks
● Deadlock Prevention
● Deadlock Avoidance
● Deadlock Detection
● Recovery from Deadlock
7.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Chapter Objectives
● To develop a description of deadlocks, which prevent sets of
concurrent processes from completing their tasks
● To present a number of different methods for preventing or
avoiding deadlocks in a computer system.
7.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
The Deadlock Problem
● A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to
acquire a resource held by another process in the set.
● Example
● System has 2 disk drives.
● P1
and P2
each hold one disk drive and each needs another one.
● Example
● semaphores A and B, initialized to 1
P0
P1
wait (A); wait(B)
wait (B); wait(A)
7.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Bridge Crossing Example
● Traffic only in one direction.
● Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource.
● If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car backs up
(preempt resources and rollback).
● Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock occurs.
● Starvation is possible.
7.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
System Model
● Resource types R1
, R2
, . . ., Rm
CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices
● Each resource type Ri
has Wi
instances.
● Each process utilizes a resource as follows:
● request
● use
● release
7.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Deadlock Characterization
● Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource.
● Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting
to acquire additional resources held by other processes.
● No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by
the process holding it, after that process has completed its task.
● Circular wait: there exists a set {P0
, P1
, …, P0
} of waiting
processes such that P0
is waiting for a resource that is held by P1
,
P1
is waiting for a resource that is held by
P2
, …, Pn–1
is waiting for a resource that is held by
Pn
, and P0
is waiting for a resource that is held by P0
.
Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
7.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph
● V is partitioned into two types:
● P = {P1
, P2
, …, Pn
}, the set consisting of all the processes in
the system.
● R = {R1
, R2
, …, Rm
}, the set consisting of all resource types
in the system.
● request edge – directed edge P1
→ Rj
● assignment edge – directed edge Rj
→ Pi
A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
7.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph (Cont.)
● Process
● Resource Type with 4 instances
● Pi
requests instance of Rj
● Pi
is holding an instance of Rj
P
i
P
i
Rj
Rj
7.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example of a Resource Allocation Graph
7.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock
7.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Graph With A Cycle But No Deadlock
7.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Basic Facts
● If graph contains no cycles ⇒ no deadlock.
● If graph contains a cycle ⇒
● if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock.
● if several instances per resource type, possibility of
deadlock.
7.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
● Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state.
● Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover.
● Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur in the
system; used by most operating systems, including UNIX.
7.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Deadlock Prevention
● Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must
hold for nonsharable resources.
● Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process
requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources.
● Require process to request and be allocated all its resources
before it begins execution, or allow process to request
resources only when the process has none.
● Low resource utilization; starvation possible.
Restrain the ways request can be made.
7.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Deadlock Prevention (Cont.)
● No Preemption –
● If a process that is holding some resources requests another
resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all
resources currently being held are released.
● Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which
the process is waiting.
● Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old
resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting.
● Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource types, and
require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of
enumeration.
7.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Deadlock Avoidance
● Simplest and most useful model requires that each process declare
the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need.
● The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the
resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a
circular-wait condition.
● Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available
and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the
processes.
Requires that the system has some additional a priori information
available.
7.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Safe State
● When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if
immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state.
● System is in safe state if there exists a sequence <P1
, P2
, …, Pn
> of ALL
the processes is the systems such that for each Pi
, the resources that Pi
can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources +
resources held by all the Pj
, with j < i.
● That is:
● If Pi
resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi
can wait
until all Pj
have finished.
● When Pj
is finished, Pi
can obtain needed resources, execute, return
allocated resources, and terminate.
● When Pi
terminates, Pi +1
can obtain its needed resources, and so on.
7.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Basic Facts
● If a system is in safe state ⇒ no deadlocks.
● If a system is in unsafe state ⇒ possibility of deadlock.
● Avoidance ⇒ ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe
state.
7.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State
7.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Avoidance algorithms
● Single instance of a resource type. Use a resource-allocation
graph
● Multiple instances of a resource type. Use the banker’s algorithm
7.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph Scheme
● Claim edge Pi
→ Rj
indicated that process Pj
may request resource
Rj
; represented by a dashed line.
● Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a
resource.
● Request edge converted to an assignment edge when the resource
is allocated to the process.
● When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge
reconverts to a claim edge.
● Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
7.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph
7.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Unsafe State In Resource-Allocation Graph
7.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm
● Suppose that process Pi
requests a resource Rj
● The request can be granted only if converting the request
edge to an assignment edge does not result in the formation
of a cycle in the resource allocation graph
7.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Banker’s Algorithm
● Multiple instances.
● Each process must a priori claim maximum use.
● When a process requests a resource it may have to wait.
● When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a
finite amount of time.
7.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm
● Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are k
instances of resource type Rj
available.
● Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi
may request
at most k instances of resource type Rj
.
● Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi
is
currently allocated k instances of Rj.
● Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi
may need k more
instances of Rj
to complete its task.
Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j].
Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
7.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Safety Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively.
Initialize:
Work = Available
Finish [i] = false for i = 0, 1, …, n- 1.
2. Find and i such that both:
(a) Finish [i] = false
(b) Needi
≤ Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state.
7.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Request Algorithm for Process Pi
Request = request vector for process Pi
. If Requesti
[j] = k then process
Pi
wants k instances of resource type Rj.
1. If Requesti
≤ Needi
go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition,
since process has exceeded its maximum claim.
2. If Requesti
≤ Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi
must wait,
since resources are not available.
3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi
by modifying the
state as follows:
Available = Available – Request;
Allocationi
= Allocationi
+ Requesti
;
Needi
= Needi
– Requesti
;
● If safe ⇒ the resources are allocated to Pi.
● If unsafe ⇒ Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state
is restored
7.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example of Banker’s Algorithm
● 5 processes P0
through P4
;
3 resource types:
A (10 instances), B (5instances), and C (7 instances).
● Snapshot at time T0
:
Allocation Max Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0
0 1 0 7 5 3 3 3 2
P1
2 0 0 3 2 2
P2
3 0 2 9 0 2
P3
2 1 1 2 2 2
P4
0 0 2 4 3 3
7.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example (Cont.)
● The content of the matrix Need is defined to be Max – Allocation.
Need
A B C
P0
7 4 3
P1
1 2 2
P2
6 0 0
P3
0 1 1
P4
4 3 1
● The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1
, P3
, P4
, P2
, P0
> satisfies
safety criteria.
7.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example: P1
Request (1,0,2)
● Check that Request ≤ Available (that is, (1,0,2) ≤ (3,3,2) ⇒ true.
Allocation Need Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0
0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0
P1
3 0 2 0 2 0
P2
3 0 1 6 0 0
P3
2 1 1 0 1 1
P4
0 0 2 4 3 1
● Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence < P1
, P3
, P4
, P0
, P2
> satisfies
safety requirement.
● Can request for (3,3,0) by P4
be granted?
● Can request for (0,2,0) by P0
be granted?
7.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Deadlock Detection
● Allow system to enter deadlock state
● Detection algorithm
● Recovery scheme
7.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Single Instance of Each Resource Type
● Maintain wait-for graph
● Nodes are processes.
● Pi
→ Pj
if Pi
is waiting for Pj
.
● Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the
graph. If there is a cycle, there exists a deadlock.
● An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an order of n2
operations, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
7.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Resource-Allocation Graph and Wait-for Graph
Resource-Allocation Graph Corresponding wait-for graph
7.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Several Instances of a Resource Type
● Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of available
resources of each type.
● Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of
each type currently allocated to each process.
● Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each
process. If Request [ij
] = k, then process Pi
is requesting k more
instances of resource type. Rj
.
7.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Detection Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively Initialize:
(a) Work = Available
(b)For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocationi
≠ 0, then
Finish[i] = false;otherwise, Finish[i] = true.
2. Find an index i such that both:
(a)Finish[i] == false
(b)Requesti
≤ Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
7.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Detection Algorithm (Cont.)
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then the system is in deadlock
state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then Pi
is deadlocked.
Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n2)
operations to detect whether the
system is in deadlocked state.
7.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example of Detection Algorithm
● Five processes P0
through P4
; three resource types
A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances).
● Snapshot at time T0
:
Allocation Request Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P1
2 0 0 2 0 2
P2
3 0 3 0 0 0
P3
2 1 1 1 0 0
P4
0 0 2 0 0 2
● Sequence <P0
, P2
, P3
, P1
, P4
> will result in Finish[i] = true for all i.
7.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Example (Cont.)
● P2
requests an additional instance of type C.
Request
A B C
P0
0 0 0
P1
2 0 1
P2
0 0 1
P3
1 0 0
P4
0 0 2
● State of system?
● Can reclaim resources held by process P0
, but insufficient resources
to fulfill other processes; requests.
● Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1
, P2
, P3
, and P4
.
7.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Detection-Algorithm Usage
● When, and how often, to invoke depends on:
● How often a deadlock is likely to occur?
● How many processes will need to be rolled back?
4 one for each disjoint cycle
● If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be many cycles in
the resource graph and so we would not be able to tell which of the many
deadlocked processes “caused” the deadlock.
7.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination
● Abort all deadlocked processes.
● Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated.
● In which order should we choose to abort?
● Priority of the process.
● How long process has computed, and how much longer to
completion.
● Resources the process has used.
● Resources process needs to complete.
● How many processes will need to be terminated.
● Is process interactive or batch?
7.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operating System Concepts - 7th
Edition, Feb 14, 2005
Recovery from Deadlock: Resource Preemption
● Selecting a victim – minimize cost.
● Rollback – return to some safe state, restart process for that state.
● Starvation – same process may always be picked as victim, include
number of rollback in cost factor.
End of Chapter 7

More Related Content

PPT
Lecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.ppt
RiaanSadiq
 
PDF
dead lock & condition in operating system
ATS SBGI MIRAJ
 
PDF
Deadlock chapter ppt....................
deepikam681248
 
PPT
An brief introduction to Deadlocks in OS
RaviKiranVarma4
 
PPT
Deadlock in OS
KioRox
 
PPTX
deadlock.pptx
VishnuDubey14
 
PPT
ch7Deadlock.ppt
FamilyAdmin
 
PPT
Deadlocks PPT Presentation from galvin book
rajinooka
 
Lecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.ppt
RiaanSadiq
 
dead lock & condition in operating system
ATS SBGI MIRAJ
 
Deadlock chapter ppt....................
deepikam681248
 
An brief introduction to Deadlocks in OS
RaviKiranVarma4
 
Deadlock in OS
KioRox
 
deadlock.pptx
VishnuDubey14
 
ch7Deadlock.ppt
FamilyAdmin
 
Deadlocks PPT Presentation from galvin book
rajinooka
 

Similar to APznzaZenBvMrFxaXzEJxdrVUNNyE0fr00QtsSxUlaP4S8BlbdSE_Orvlh8uM-L7GkOENfMiqmxPmFCZrasYhForPFDqQ2YJiGbKwP884VNUmLPA1EBFgyHxL1RBHz8Hmn9N2iCGLGwKybDvLHNzRvFnCJFma3rNajyukK5QLLo85-u.pdf (20)

PPT
ch7.ppt deadlocks operating systems- ppt
geetanjaligarg3
 
PPT
chapter 7 operating system introducution and brief of memory managemnt
shettymanvi
 
PPT
ch7.ppt bjhef er4wr wer t4wrt r3 rt rr tw
geetanjaligarg3
 
PPT
ch7 powerpoint presentation introduction.ppt
Rahul Borate
 
PPT
operating system concepts of deadlocks detection
fouziasulthanak
 
PPT
Unit3-ch7.ppt operating systems basics, theory
mallichettusairahul
 
PPT
System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadloc...
mukulbishoyee
 
PPT
MPMC chapter
subhamsriramka
 
PPT
ch7.ppt
Sami Mughal
 
PPT
Galvin Operating Systems of deadlock.ppt
ranjithasr8
 
PPT
ch7.ppt
DrMajidMumtaz
 
PPT
ch7.ppt
KamranAli649587
 
PPT
ch7- Deadlock.ppt
Hiteshchauhan84
 
PPTX
Deadlocks in Opearting Systems, detection, handling, recovery
salmanchaudhry909
 
PPT
Chapter 7fvsdfghjksdfghjkfghjsdfghjdfghjsdfghjk.ppt
ASMAAKTER221154636
 
PPT
Deadlocks
ssuser351f7b
 
PDF
ch07.pdf
sharada3
 
PPT
Chapter 7
Amin Omi
 
PPT
Deadlocks
SyedTalhaBukhari2
 
PPT
Galvin-operating System(Ch8)
dsuyal1
 
ch7.ppt deadlocks operating systems- ppt
geetanjaligarg3
 
chapter 7 operating system introducution and brief of memory managemnt
shettymanvi
 
ch7.ppt bjhef er4wr wer t4wrt r3 rt rr tw
geetanjaligarg3
 
ch7 powerpoint presentation introduction.ppt
Rahul Borate
 
operating system concepts of deadlocks detection
fouziasulthanak
 
Unit3-ch7.ppt operating systems basics, theory
mallichettusairahul
 
System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadloc...
mukulbishoyee
 
MPMC chapter
subhamsriramka
 
ch7.ppt
Sami Mughal
 
Galvin Operating Systems of deadlock.ppt
ranjithasr8
 
ch7.ppt
DrMajidMumtaz
 
ch7- Deadlock.ppt
Hiteshchauhan84
 
Deadlocks in Opearting Systems, detection, handling, recovery
salmanchaudhry909
 
Chapter 7fvsdfghjksdfghjkfghjsdfghjdfghjsdfghjk.ppt
ASMAAKTER221154636
 
Deadlocks
ssuser351f7b
 
ch07.pdf
sharada3
 
Chapter 7
Amin Omi
 
Galvin-operating System(Ch8)
dsuyal1
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Research about a FoodFolio app for personalized dietary tracking and health o...
AustinLiamAndres
 
PPTX
Trading Procedures (1).pptxcffcdddxxddsss
garv794
 
PDF
Linux OS guide to know, operate. Linux Filesystem, command, users and system
Kiran Maharjan
 
PDF
A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness.pdf
Epistamai
 
PDF
Company Profile 2023 PT. ZEKON INDONESIA.pdf
hendranofriadi26
 
PPTX
Data Security Breach: Immediate Action Plan
varmabhuvan266
 
PDF
Mastering Financial Analysis Materials.pdf
SalamiAbdullahi
 
PPTX
Web_Engineering_Assignment_Clean.pptxfor college
HUSNAINAHMAD39
 
PDF
Technical Writing Module-I Complete Notes.pdf
VedprakashArya13
 
PPTX
Economic Sector Performance Recovery.pptx
yulisbaso2020
 
PDF
Data_Cleaning_Infographic_Series_by_CA_Suvidha_Chaplot.pdf
CA Suvidha Chaplot
 
PDF
blockchain123456789012345678901234567890
tanvikhunt1003
 
PPTX
Web dev -ppt that helps us understand web technology
shubhragoyal12
 
PPTX
Purple and Violet Modern Marketing Presentation (1).pptx
SanthoshKumar229321
 
PPTX
Introduction to Data Analytics and Data Science
KavithaCIT
 
PPTX
Future_of_AI_Presentation for everyone.pptx
boranamanju07
 
PPTX
Measurement of Afordability for Water Supply and Sanitation in Bangladesh .pptx
akmibrahimbd
 
PPTX
Analysis of Employee_Attrition_Presentation.pptx
AdawuRedeemer
 
PPTX
Decoding Physical Presence: Unlocking Business Intelligence with Wi-Fi Analytics
meghahiremath253
 
PPT
Grade 5 PPT_Science_Q2_W6_Methods of reproduction.ppt
AaronBaluyut
 
Research about a FoodFolio app for personalized dietary tracking and health o...
AustinLiamAndres
 
Trading Procedures (1).pptxcffcdddxxddsss
garv794
 
Linux OS guide to know, operate. Linux Filesystem, command, users and system
Kiran Maharjan
 
A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness.pdf
Epistamai
 
Company Profile 2023 PT. ZEKON INDONESIA.pdf
hendranofriadi26
 
Data Security Breach: Immediate Action Plan
varmabhuvan266
 
Mastering Financial Analysis Materials.pdf
SalamiAbdullahi
 
Web_Engineering_Assignment_Clean.pptxfor college
HUSNAINAHMAD39
 
Technical Writing Module-I Complete Notes.pdf
VedprakashArya13
 
Economic Sector Performance Recovery.pptx
yulisbaso2020
 
Data_Cleaning_Infographic_Series_by_CA_Suvidha_Chaplot.pdf
CA Suvidha Chaplot
 
blockchain123456789012345678901234567890
tanvikhunt1003
 
Web dev -ppt that helps us understand web technology
shubhragoyal12
 
Purple and Violet Modern Marketing Presentation (1).pptx
SanthoshKumar229321
 
Introduction to Data Analytics and Data Science
KavithaCIT
 
Future_of_AI_Presentation for everyone.pptx
boranamanju07
 
Measurement of Afordability for Water Supply and Sanitation in Bangladesh .pptx
akmibrahimbd
 
Analysis of Employee_Attrition_Presentation.pptx
AdawuRedeemer
 
Decoding Physical Presence: Unlocking Business Intelligence with Wi-Fi Analytics
meghahiremath253
 
Grade 5 PPT_Science_Q2_W6_Methods of reproduction.ppt
AaronBaluyut
 
Ad

APznzaZenBvMrFxaXzEJxdrVUNNyE0fr00QtsSxUlaP4S8BlbdSE_Orvlh8uM-L7GkOENfMiqmxPmFCZrasYhForPFDqQ2YJiGbKwP884VNUmLPA1EBFgyHxL1RBHz8Hmn9N2iCGLGwKybDvLHNzRvFnCJFma3rNajyukK5QLLo85-u.pdf

  • 2. 7.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Chapter 7: Deadlocks ● The Deadlock Problem ● System Model ● Deadlock Characterization ● Methods for Handling Deadlocks ● Deadlock Prevention ● Deadlock Avoidance ● Deadlock Detection ● Recovery from Deadlock
  • 3. 7.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Chapter Objectives ● To develop a description of deadlocks, which prevent sets of concurrent processes from completing their tasks ● To present a number of different methods for preventing or avoiding deadlocks in a computer system.
  • 4. 7.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 The Deadlock Problem ● A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in the set. ● Example ● System has 2 disk drives. ● P1 and P2 each hold one disk drive and each needs another one. ● Example ● semaphores A and B, initialized to 1 P0 P1 wait (A); wait(B) wait (B); wait(A)
  • 5. 7.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Bridge Crossing Example ● Traffic only in one direction. ● Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource. ● If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car backs up (preempt resources and rollback). ● Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock occurs. ● Starvation is possible.
  • 6. 7.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 System Model ● Resource types R1 , R2 , . . ., Rm CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices ● Each resource type Ri has Wi instances. ● Each process utilizes a resource as follows: ● request ● use ● release
  • 7. 7.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Deadlock Characterization ● Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource. ● Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other processes. ● No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has completed its task. ● Circular wait: there exists a set {P0 , P1 , …, P0 } of waiting processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P1 , P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P2 , …, Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by Pn , and P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P0 . Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
  • 8. 7.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph ● V is partitioned into two types: ● P = {P1 , P2 , …, Pn }, the set consisting of all the processes in the system. ● R = {R1 , R2 , …, Rm }, the set consisting of all resource types in the system. ● request edge – directed edge P1 → Rj ● assignment edge – directed edge Rj → Pi A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
  • 9. 7.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph (Cont.) ● Process ● Resource Type with 4 instances ● Pi requests instance of Rj ● Pi is holding an instance of Rj P i P i Rj Rj
  • 10. 7.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example of a Resource Allocation Graph
  • 11. 7.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock
  • 12. 7.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Graph With A Cycle But No Deadlock
  • 13. 7.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Basic Facts ● If graph contains no cycles ⇒ no deadlock. ● If graph contains a cycle ⇒ ● if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock. ● if several instances per resource type, possibility of deadlock.
  • 14. 7.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Methods for Handling Deadlocks ● Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state. ● Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover. ● Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur in the system; used by most operating systems, including UNIX.
  • 15. 7.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Deadlock Prevention ● Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must hold for nonsharable resources. ● Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources. ● Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it begins execution, or allow process to request resources only when the process has none. ● Low resource utilization; starvation possible. Restrain the ways request can be made.
  • 16. 7.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) ● No Preemption – ● If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources currently being held are released. ● Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the process is waiting. ● Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting. ● Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration.
  • 17. 7.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Deadlock Avoidance ● Simplest and most useful model requires that each process declare the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need. ● The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a circular-wait condition. ● Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the processes. Requires that the system has some additional a priori information available.
  • 18. 7.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Safe State ● When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state. ● System is in safe state if there exists a sequence <P1 , P2 , …, Pn > of ALL the processes is the systems such that for each Pi , the resources that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources + resources held by all the Pj , with j < i. ● That is: ● If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi can wait until all Pj have finished. ● When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute, return allocated resources, and terminate. ● When Pi terminates, Pi +1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on.
  • 19. 7.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Basic Facts ● If a system is in safe state ⇒ no deadlocks. ● If a system is in unsafe state ⇒ possibility of deadlock. ● Avoidance ⇒ ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe state.
  • 20. 7.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State
  • 21. 7.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Avoidance algorithms ● Single instance of a resource type. Use a resource-allocation graph ● Multiple instances of a resource type. Use the banker’s algorithm
  • 22. 7.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph Scheme ● Claim edge Pi → Rj indicated that process Pj may request resource Rj ; represented by a dashed line. ● Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource. ● Request edge converted to an assignment edge when the resource is allocated to the process. ● When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge. ● Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
  • 23. 7.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph
  • 24. 7.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Unsafe State In Resource-Allocation Graph
  • 25. 7.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm ● Suppose that process Pi requests a resource Rj ● The request can be granted only if converting the request edge to an assignment edge does not result in the formation of a cycle in the resource allocation graph
  • 26. 7.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Banker’s Algorithm ● Multiple instances. ● Each process must a priori claim maximum use. ● When a process requests a resource it may have to wait. ● When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a finite amount of time.
  • 27. 7.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm ● Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are k instances of resource type Rj available. ● Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may request at most k instances of resource type Rj . ● Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is currently allocated k instances of Rj. ● Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k more instances of Rj to complete its task. Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j]. Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
  • 28. 7.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Safety Algorithm 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively. Initialize: Work = Available Finish [i] = false for i = 0, 1, …, n- 1. 2. Find and i such that both: (a) Finish [i] = false (b) Needi ≤ Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. 3. Work = Work + Allocationi Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state.
  • 29. 7.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Request Algorithm for Process Pi Request = request vector for process Pi . If Requesti [j] = k then process Pi wants k instances of resource type Rj. 1. If Requesti ≤ Needi go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim. 2. If Requesti ≤ Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi must wait, since resources are not available. 3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by modifying the state as follows: Available = Available – Request; Allocationi = Allocationi + Requesti ; Needi = Needi – Requesti ; ● If safe ⇒ the resources are allocated to Pi. ● If unsafe ⇒ Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is restored
  • 30. 7.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example of Banker’s Algorithm ● 5 processes P0 through P4 ; 3 resource types: A (10 instances), B (5instances), and C (7 instances). ● Snapshot at time T0 : Allocation Max Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 7 5 3 3 3 2 P1 2 0 0 3 2 2 P2 3 0 2 9 0 2 P3 2 1 1 2 2 2 P4 0 0 2 4 3 3
  • 31. 7.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example (Cont.) ● The content of the matrix Need is defined to be Max – Allocation. Need A B C P0 7 4 3 P1 1 2 2 P2 6 0 0 P3 0 1 1 P4 4 3 1 ● The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1 , P3 , P4 , P2 , P0 > satisfies safety criteria.
  • 32. 7.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example: P1 Request (1,0,2) ● Check that Request ≤ Available (that is, (1,0,2) ≤ (3,3,2) ⇒ true. Allocation Need Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0 P1 3 0 2 0 2 0 P2 3 0 1 6 0 0 P3 2 1 1 0 1 1 P4 0 0 2 4 3 1 ● Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence < P1 , P3 , P4 , P0 , P2 > satisfies safety requirement. ● Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted? ● Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
  • 33. 7.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Deadlock Detection ● Allow system to enter deadlock state ● Detection algorithm ● Recovery scheme
  • 34. 7.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Single Instance of Each Resource Type ● Maintain wait-for graph ● Nodes are processes. ● Pi → Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj . ● Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the graph. If there is a cycle, there exists a deadlock. ● An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an order of n2 operations, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
  • 35. 7.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Resource-Allocation Graph and Wait-for Graph Resource-Allocation Graph Corresponding wait-for graph
  • 36. 7.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Several Instances of a Resource Type ● Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of available resources of each type. ● Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of each type currently allocated to each process. ● Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each process. If Request [ij ] = k, then process Pi is requesting k more instances of resource type. Rj .
  • 37. 7.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Detection Algorithm 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively Initialize: (a) Work = Available (b)For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocationi ≠ 0, then Finish[i] = false;otherwise, Finish[i] = true. 2. Find an index i such that both: (a)Finish[i] == false (b)Requesti ≤ Work If no such i exists, go to step 4.
  • 38. 7.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Detection Algorithm (Cont.) 3. Work = Work + Allocationi Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then the system is in deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then Pi is deadlocked. Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n2) operations to detect whether the system is in deadlocked state.
  • 39. 7.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example of Detection Algorithm ● Five processes P0 through P4 ; three resource types A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances). ● Snapshot at time T0 : Allocation Request Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P1 2 0 0 2 0 2 P2 3 0 3 0 0 0 P3 2 1 1 1 0 0 P4 0 0 2 0 0 2 ● Sequence <P0 , P2 , P3 , P1 , P4 > will result in Finish[i] = true for all i.
  • 40. 7.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Example (Cont.) ● P2 requests an additional instance of type C. Request A B C P0 0 0 0 P1 2 0 1 P2 0 0 1 P3 1 0 0 P4 0 0 2 ● State of system? ● Can reclaim resources held by process P0 , but insufficient resources to fulfill other processes; requests. ● Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1 , P2 , P3 , and P4 .
  • 41. 7.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Detection-Algorithm Usage ● When, and how often, to invoke depends on: ● How often a deadlock is likely to occur? ● How many processes will need to be rolled back? 4 one for each disjoint cycle ● If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be many cycles in the resource graph and so we would not be able to tell which of the many deadlocked processes “caused” the deadlock.
  • 42. 7.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination ● Abort all deadlocked processes. ● Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated. ● In which order should we choose to abort? ● Priority of the process. ● How long process has computed, and how much longer to completion. ● Resources the process has used. ● Resources process needs to complete. ● How many processes will need to be terminated. ● Is process interactive or batch?
  • 43. 7.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 14, 2005 Recovery from Deadlock: Resource Preemption ● Selecting a victim – minimize cost. ● Rollback – return to some safe state, restart process for that state. ● Starvation – same process may always be picked as victim, include number of rollback in cost factor.