The document discusses areas that are assessed to evaluate intellectual disability. A thorough assessment involves comprehensive medical exams, genetic/neurological testing, educational/family histories, psychological testing of intellectual and adaptive functioning, and interviews. Psychological tests assess IQ, learning abilities, and behaviors using standardized tests. Commonly used IQ tests include the Wechsler scales, Stanford-Binet, and McCarthy scales. Tests of adaptive functioning evaluate social/emotional maturity. Vocational assessments evaluate skills and capacities to identify strengths/weaknesses for vocational programming. The goal is to improve quality of life.
Overview of intellectual disabilities assessment covering physical and behavioral evaluation, limitations in intellectual and adaptive functioning.
Discussion of various standardized IQ tests for different age groups, including WISC, WAIS, and Stanford-Binet, assessing verbal and spatial abilities.
Introduction of adaptive functioning tests, such as Vineland and Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale, evaluating social and practical life skills.
Emphasis on cognitive assessments for measuring children's learning capabilities, including different assessment tools like Wechsler and Stanford-Binet.
Explanation of vocational assessments, aiming to analyze individual skills and prepare for employment, highlighting ecological and qualitative approaches.
Description of traditional and contemporary approaches in vocational assessment for intellectually disabled individuals, focusing on psychological and adaptive skills.
Call to action for enhancing the quality of life for individuals with disabilities through human service programs.
AREAS OF ASSESSMENT
FORINTELLETUAL
DISABILITY
Dr (Mrs) P. Jeeva Shanthi
Assistant Professor,
Department of Special Education,
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher
Education for Women, Coimbatore.
2.
Introduction:
The firstindication of an intellectual disability is usually a child’s
physical & behavioral characteristics.
Once an intellectual disability is suspected ,a formal evaluation &
assessment begins.
The evaluation begins with a complete physical examination.
The intellectual disabilities are defined by two major symptoms
1. Limitations in intellectual functioning
2. Limitations in adaptive functioning (include conceptual , social &
practical skills)
3.
A thorough assessmentinvolves the
following:
Comprehensive medical exam
Possible genetic and neurological testing
Social & family history
Educational history
Psychological testing to assess intellectual functioning
Testing to adaptive functioning
Interviews with primary caregivers
Interviews with teachers
Social & behavioral observation of a child in natural environment.
4.
Psychological assessment:
Varioustypes of standardized psychological tests are used during the
assessment of intellectual functioning.
These tests assess intelligence(IQ),Learning abilities, and behavioral
skills.
A standardized test is uniformly designed and consistently
administered.
The test of intellectual functioning are designed to measure different
mental abilities are called IQ Tests.
Previously an IQ score of 70 or below was the recommended cut
off score
5.
The IQScores falling between 85 & 115 are common
Only 2.5% will be below a score of 130
This group represents people with an unusually high IQ.They are
often termed “GIFTED”
Historically,scores below 70 indicated an intellectual disability.
The IQ tests has two parts
one part measures verbal abilities
Other part measures spatial abilities (performance skills)
6.
Some of themore commonly used IQ tests
:
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children:
this is an IQ test for children ages 6 to 16.
The test has several subtests
There are verbal skills & spatial skills
The verbal skills include :vocabulary, comprehension,
math,& informational knowledge
The performance test include: picture completion &
arrangement; block design; object assembly; and coding.
7.
Wechsler Pre-school andPrimary scale of
intelligence:
This is an IQ tests for children 3 to 7 years old.
This test is organized like WISC.
It measures two key aspects of intelligence:
• Verbal skills
• Spatial (performance) skills
• This test is not appropriate for individuals with severe
intellectual disability.
8.
Wechsler adult intelligencescale(WAIS):
This is an IQ tests for people over sixteen years of age.
This is similar to the WISC
The questions are more difficult since it tests adult
It also measures the two areas of intelligence.
9.
Stanford-Binet intelligence scale:
This is an IQ tests for people between 2 to 23 years of age
There are fifteen subtests for older groups
Six subtests are administered to all the age groups
These are vocabulary, comprehension ,pattern analysis ,
quantitative, bead memory,& memory for sentences.
10.
McCarthy scales ofchildren’s abilities:
this test measures the cognitive & motor abilities of children
between the ages of 2.5 to 8.5 years old.
There are six sections to this test
These are: verbal scale ; perceptual-performance scale; quantitative
scale; memory scale; motor scale ;and general cognitive scale.
This also tests individual ability scores.
11.
Bayley scales ofinfant development:
These tests are used to assess the development of infants and
toddlers ages 1-42 months
This tests is also used with older children who are unable to take
age-appropriate tests.
There are three sections :
Mental abilities- object performance;attention;non-verbal
communication & vocalization.
Motor abilities -fine & gross motor skills
Behavioural abilities –social &emotional behaviour
12.
Tests of adaptivefunctioning:
Tests of adaptive functioning evaluate the social 7 emotional
maturity of a child ,relative to his or her peers.
They also help to evaluate life skills and abilities.
Commonly used tests of adaptive functioning are described below:
Woodcock Johnson Scales Of Independent Behavior:
This test measures independent behavior in children.
13.
Vineland Adaptive BehaviourScale(VABS):
This test measures the social skills of people from birth to 19 years
of age.
This test is not administered directly to the child.
Instead, questions are directed to primary caregivers and other
people familiar with the child
The test contains four sections:
communication
Daily living skills
Socialization and
Motor skills.
14.
The Diagnostic AdaptiveBehavior Scale:
This tests measures adaptive behavioural skills
These are three main categories of these skills:
Conceptual
Social and
Practical life skills
This test is very helpful for determining the intensity and maximize
quality of life.
15.
Cognitive assessments:
Cognitiveassessment or intelligence tests are used to determine a
child’s learning capability by identifying their cognitive strengths &
weaknesses.
cognitive assessments with children require the administration of
standardized psychometric tools by experienced and accredited
psychologists
These tools assess various areas of cognitive capacity.
16.
Examples of assessingvarious areas of
cognitive capacity
Verbal comprehension:
the ability to use a range of vocabulary to understand and
express general knowledge and explain concepts.
Perceptual reasoning:
the ability to solve complex non- verbal problems.
Working memory:
the ability to learn ,manipulate, and retain information
to complete new tasks.
Processing speed:
the ability to quickly process & make judgments about
visual information.
17.
Assessment tools:
Thereare various cognitive assessment tools that are used for
various purposes and age groups are:
Wechsler Intelligence scales children- fourth edition
Stanford Binet – fifth edition
Wechsler Pre-school & primary scale of intelligence –
fourth edition.
18.
Vocational assessment:
Vocationalassessment can be broadly defined as the “process of
obtaining information about a worker’s skills and performance in
order to makeappropriate training decisions”(Bellamy,Horner and
Inamn,1979)
AIM OF VOCATIONAL ASSESSMENT:
The main aim of vocational assessment is to help in
assessing the individual’s skills and capacities and in pin-pointing the
strengths and weakness for eventual vocational programming.
19.
Principles of vocationalassessment:
The vocational assessment must be ecological.
Vocational assessment must include both quantitative & qualitative components.
Vocational assessment should have predictive validity for dertermining the
individual’s ability to perform equally well in almost all instances.
Vocational assessment instruments must reflect placement opportunities in present
and subsequent work setting.
Vocational assessment should focus on work related skills and behaviors that
could impede the employment opportunities.
He assessment must proceed from global to specific measures as the individual
prepares for gainful employment
20.
Approaches of vocationalassessment:
The vocational assessments has two approaches
The traditional approach &
Contemporary assessment approach
21.
Traditional approach tovocational
assessment:
The traditional approach to vocational assessment mainly encompasses
psychological measurement approach, assessment of psychomotor skills and
work sample.
Several psychological variables like intelligence, vocational aptitudes ,occupational
interests have been used to predict performance of Id child.
The commonly used intelligence tests: Wechsler Adult intelligence scale –R, Binet
Scales and maze tests for predicting performance of Id workers.
Psychological measures which have been used to assess are aptitude tests, like
Minnesota Paper Form Board , opinion tests, and picture interest inventory.
The work sample approach represents the most popular assessment strategy used
in vocational assessment.
22.
Contemporary approach tovocational
assessment
Contemporary approach include three newly developed areas to
vocational assessment of Id persons
These are assessment of adaptive behavior , survival skills and
process assessment approach.
Adaptive behaviour refers to a wide range of appropriate behaviours
in diverse social contexts.
The most commonly used adaptive behaviour are AAMD Adaptive
Behaviour Scale ,Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale and
Vocational Behavior checklist.
23.
Conclusions:
Improving qualityof life for handicapped individuals should be
overriding concern of all human service programmes & measures of
life-style.