International Perspectives on
Technology-Enhanced Learning
OER: Innovation for
Development?
Professor Asha Kanwar & Dr. K. Balasubramanian
Commonwealth of Learning
UBC, 13 July, 2013
Plan
 Context
 OER as an innovation
 Are OER addressing some of the challenges?
 Strategies to harness OER4D
 The COL Approach
CONTEXT
COL Vision
Intergovernmental Organization
1987 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), Vancouver, Canada
Created by the Heads of
Commonwealth at CHOGM 1987
© Commonwealth Secretariat
WHAT IS IT FOR?
To help Commonwealth governments
and institutions use various
technologies to improve and expand
learning for development
Access to Learning
is the Key to Development
Commonwealth
 60% of the population
under 25
 1/3 of the world’s poor, 2/3
of them are women (ODI, 2009)
 23.3 million primary age
children out of school
 460 million illiterate adults
Education for All
(The Dakar Goals)
Peace
Democracy
Equality
Good governance
Development
Challenges
Development
Challenges
 Universal Primary
Education
 Gender Equality
 Health
 Poverty
 Universal Primary
Education
 Gender Equality
 Health
 Poverty
PHOTO: David Walker, PNG
CW Countries off track to
achieve MDGs
 MDG 1: poverty reduction: 14 (6 on track for 2020)
 MDG 2: universal primary education: 7 (12 on track for
2020)
 MDG 3: gender equality: 3 (4 on track for 2020)
Source:
– World bank MDG dataset (Last updated in April 2013):
http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/millennium-
development-indicators
400 million children (12-17) out of secondary school
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Access to Higher Education
Sub-
Saharan
Africa 10%
South Asia
15%
OECD
Average
40-50%
HIGHER EDUCATION
Caribbean
25%
Source: The Economist Dec 1st – 7th, 2012, Higher education, Not what it used to be.
Can technology help?
 Distance learning
 Online learning
 OER
OER AS AN INNOVATION
‘…the lack of content …[is] the
major barrier[s] that
governments need to tackle….’
The world telecommunications/ICT Development report,
ITU, 2010
Open Educational Resources (OER)
OER are teaching, learning and
research materials in any medium
that reside in the public domain or
have been released under an open
license that permits their free use
and in some instances, re-purposing
by others
Atkins, Brown & Hammond, 2007
Why OER?
 Reduces costs
 Enhance access
 Improve quality
Can OER reduce Costs?
 20 teacher education programmes in
12 countries
 Materials available in 4 languages
 In 2010, 320,000 teachers benefited
$$
$
$
OER and Textbooks
Brazil: for 75% of students at
University of São Paulo, the cost of
acquiring books was higher than the
family’s monthly income.
Research Group for Public Policies for Access to Information,
qtd in Butcher & Hoosen, Business Case for OER, COL:
Vancouver, 2012, p. 17
OERU
 University of
Southern Queensland
 Otago Polytechnic
 Athabasca University
The OER university concept. Adapted from Taylor (2007)
James
Taylor
Access: Malawi
 Bunda College of Agriculture
 102 page Communications Skills textbook
 75% OER
 Adapted by adding contextually relevant
materials, activities, assignments
Access: translation
CORE
COL ID template
translated and adapted by
Open University of China
COL materials
in Ukrainian
Can OER contribute to Quality?
 611 institutions in India
– KSS Women’s Engineering College, Andhra Pradesh
– Maya Devi Educational Foundation, Uttarakhand
– Bhilai Institute of Technology, Chattisgarh
CAN OER ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES?
What of Social
Dimensions?
OER cannot be viewed
only from the economic
and financial perspective
The Digital Divide (Commonwealth countries)
Source: Latest data from International Telecommunications Union Database
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reporting/DynamicReportWizard.aspx
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Africa Asia Caribbean Europe North America Pacific
Proportion of households with Internet access Proportion of households with Computer access
the network society….
is a major source of
the structuration of
power relationships.
Manuel Castells
Divides
Knowledge
Prosperity
Inclusion Geography
Race
Gender
Economic
Disability
Digital Divide
Social Exclusion of Education in
India: By Caste and Gender
http://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/4562.pdf?expires=1372886270&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=361D2E69B7AECC03686D
0FE1AFEEB730
OER by itself will not
be able to address
inequality
Justin Reich in https://edutechdebate.org/oer-and-digital-divide/open-educational-resources-expand-educational-
inequalities/
Open Educational Resources Expand
Educational Inequalities
Open Educational Resources Expand
Educational Inequalities
 … teachers working in schools serving low
income students simply can't make as much
use of…. the technology ….. because they
lack the planning time, broadband access,
etc. In this model, schools with greater
fiscal and human resources have more
capacity to take advantage of even free and
open resources.
Justin Reich in https://edutechdebate.org/oer-and-digital-divide/open-educational-resources-expand-educational-
inequalities/
Teacher as a stakeholder
Teachers who come to rural
schools, hungry
 Zambia: 57%
 Sierra Leone: 100%
 Ghana: 36%
 Lesotho: 59%
 India: 12%
Source: Bennell and Akyeampong (2007)
DFID
Being a Woman Teacher in Nepal
Social Exclusion of Women Teachers at
the Entry Level
Factors of Social Exclusion
Non-Local
Dalit woman
Disabled Woman
Unmarried
Source: Laxmi Paudyal, 2012
http://www.socialinclusion.org.np/new/files/Laxmi%20Paudyal_1365492827dWdb.pdf
Education in many countries
 Based on centralised systems with limited
academic freedom
 Poor governance
 Teachers as stakeholders have limited voice
 Lack of stakeholder involvement
 Minimal dialogues
44% of the countries have low level
of freedom and 33% moderate
freedom in managing non-
governmental schools.
Can Open Educational Resources
thrive in closed educational settings?
STRATEGIES TO HARNESS
OER4D
Strategies should
address both economic
and social issues
Process-oriented approach
“Opening educational resources is
an action that will cause
education to move to a new
place”. (Breck, 2007:3).
and not just as a product
Mobilizing stakeholders
Phases Characteristics
1 Appropriation ability of every stakeholder to have access to the
tools of OER. This would not only include the
availability of infrastructure, but also the social
access to every stakeholder irrespective of class,
gender and ethnicity
2 Localization reflects the meaning, position and physical space
given to OERs vis-à-vis social, political and cultural
values.
3 Incorporation Every stakeholder should have the ability to interact
with OER and use them for strengthening the
educational goals of the community.
4 Conversion The stakeholder is encouraged to look beyond the
community and enter into a relationship with the
global community. In addition, the stakeholder is
also influencing the structure and functions of
OER.
Domestication of OER
Localisation: principles
 Involve locals
 A community of practice bolsters localisation
 Must be done in appropriate formats
 Understand local contexts
http://gradworks.umi.com/3450142.pdf
Localization of Open Educational Resources
(OER) in Nepal: Strategies of Himalayan
Knowledge-Workers
Tiffany Zenith Ivins
March 2011
Emphasis on Governance
People have a say in the development
of these ideas and meanings because
they are able to participate in their
creation, growth, and spread.
 Participatory approach
 Decentralised organisational structures
 Learner centricity
Re-defining OER
 The phenomenon of OER/OLR is an
empowerment process, facilitated by
technology in which various types of
stakeholders are able to interact,
collaborate, create and use materials and
pedagogic practices, that are freely
available, for enhancing access, reducing
costs and improving the quality of education
and learning at all levels.
From ‘divide’ to ‘dividend’
 emphasis on people, rather than on
technologies
 knowledge as a social product emerging as an
interface of machine, individual, society
 learning as a process of knowledge creation
THE COL APPROACH
Paris Declaration on OER
Advocacy
Capacity
Policy
Research
Photo:CC-BYDavideStorti
The 2012 Paris OER
Declaration drafting group at
UNESCO Headquarters,
Paris, France
OER : open schooling
Schools Teachers Consultants
Ministries
of Education
Frances Ferreira
Teacher Education
Global Demand for Teachers: 1.7 million
 strengthening teacher education through the use of
technology and distance learning.
 350,000 teachers and teacher educators trained in
24 countries.
 reaching teachers in marginalised groups including
nomadic communities
Dr. Abdurrahman Umar
Education for All
(The Dakar Goals)
The Virtual University for Small States of the Commonwealth
Disaster management
Sustainable agriculture
Business &
Entrepreneurship
John Lesperance
Technical & Vocational
Skills Development
Impact – 150% increase in income
Alison Mead
Richardson
TVET
Institutions
TVET
Teachers
TVET
Students
Outcomes
Dr. K. Balasubramanian
Ian Pringle
The COL Approach
 Encourages participation and wider
stakeholder engagement
 Uses a range of appropriate technologies
 Takes a holistic approach
How can technology-enhanced
learning
 reach the digitally deprived and socially
excluded?
 transform closed educational systems?
 accelerate progress towards achieving
development goals such as MDGs and EFAs?
THANK YOU
www.col.org

Open Education Resources: Innovation for Development

  • 1.
    International Perspectives on Technology-EnhancedLearning OER: Innovation for Development? Professor Asha Kanwar & Dr. K. Balasubramanian Commonwealth of Learning UBC, 13 July, 2013
  • 2.
    Plan  Context  OERas an innovation  Are OER addressing some of the challenges?  Strategies to harness OER4D  The COL Approach
  • 3.
  • 4.
    COL Vision Intergovernmental Organization 1987Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), Vancouver, Canada Created by the Heads of Commonwealth at CHOGM 1987 © Commonwealth Secretariat
  • 5.
    WHAT IS ITFOR? To help Commonwealth governments and institutions use various technologies to improve and expand learning for development Access to Learning is the Key to Development
  • 7.
    Commonwealth  60% ofthe population under 25  1/3 of the world’s poor, 2/3 of them are women (ODI, 2009)  23.3 million primary age children out of school  460 million illiterate adults
  • 8.
    Education for All (TheDakar Goals) Peace Democracy Equality Good governance
  • 9.
    Development Challenges Development Challenges  Universal Primary Education Gender Equality  Health  Poverty  Universal Primary Education  Gender Equality  Health  Poverty PHOTO: David Walker, PNG
  • 10.
    CW Countries offtrack to achieve MDGs  MDG 1: poverty reduction: 14 (6 on track for 2020)  MDG 2: universal primary education: 7 (12 on track for 2020)  MDG 3: gender equality: 3 (4 on track for 2020) Source: – World bank MDG dataset (Last updated in April 2013): http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/millennium- development-indicators
  • 11.
    400 million children(12-17) out of secondary school
  • 12.
    70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Access to HigherEducation Sub- Saharan Africa 10% South Asia 15% OECD Average 40-50% HIGHER EDUCATION Caribbean 25%
  • 13.
    Source: The EconomistDec 1st – 7th, 2012, Higher education, Not what it used to be.
  • 14.
    Can technology help? Distance learning  Online learning  OER
  • 15.
    OER AS ANINNOVATION
  • 16.
    ‘…the lack ofcontent …[is] the major barrier[s] that governments need to tackle….’ The world telecommunications/ICT Development report, ITU, 2010
  • 17.
    Open Educational Resources(OER) OER are teaching, learning and research materials in any medium that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits their free use and in some instances, re-purposing by others Atkins, Brown & Hammond, 2007
  • 18.
    Why OER?  Reducescosts  Enhance access  Improve quality
  • 20.
    Can OER reduceCosts?  20 teacher education programmes in 12 countries  Materials available in 4 languages  In 2010, 320,000 teachers benefited
  • 21.
    $$ $ $ OER and Textbooks Brazil:for 75% of students at University of São Paulo, the cost of acquiring books was higher than the family’s monthly income. Research Group for Public Policies for Access to Information, qtd in Butcher & Hoosen, Business Case for OER, COL: Vancouver, 2012, p. 17
  • 22.
    OERU  University of SouthernQueensland  Otago Polytechnic  Athabasca University
  • 23.
    The OER universityconcept. Adapted from Taylor (2007) James Taylor
  • 24.
    Access: Malawi  BundaCollege of Agriculture  102 page Communications Skills textbook  75% OER  Adapted by adding contextually relevant materials, activities, assignments
  • 25.
    Access: translation CORE COL IDtemplate translated and adapted by Open University of China COL materials in Ukrainian
  • 26.
    Can OER contributeto Quality?  611 institutions in India – KSS Women’s Engineering College, Andhra Pradesh – Maya Devi Educational Foundation, Uttarakhand – Bhilai Institute of Technology, Chattisgarh
  • 27.
  • 28.
    What of Social Dimensions? OERcannot be viewed only from the economic and financial perspective
  • 29.
    The Digital Divide(Commonwealth countries) Source: Latest data from International Telecommunications Union Database http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Reporting/DynamicReportWizard.aspx 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Africa Asia Caribbean Europe North America Pacific Proportion of households with Internet access Proportion of households with Computer access
  • 30.
    the network society…. isa major source of the structuration of power relationships. Manuel Castells
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Social Exclusion ofEducation in India: By Caste and Gender http://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/4562.pdf?expires=1372886270&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=361D2E69B7AECC03686D 0FE1AFEEB730
  • 33.
    OER by itselfwill not be able to address inequality
  • 34.
    Justin Reich inhttps://edutechdebate.org/oer-and-digital-divide/open-educational-resources-expand-educational- inequalities/ Open Educational Resources Expand Educational Inequalities
  • 35.
    Open Educational ResourcesExpand Educational Inequalities  … teachers working in schools serving low income students simply can't make as much use of…. the technology ….. because they lack the planning time, broadband access, etc. In this model, schools with greater fiscal and human resources have more capacity to take advantage of even free and open resources. Justin Reich in https://edutechdebate.org/oer-and-digital-divide/open-educational-resources-expand-educational- inequalities/
  • 36.
    Teacher as astakeholder
  • 37.
    Teachers who cometo rural schools, hungry  Zambia: 57%  Sierra Leone: 100%  Ghana: 36%  Lesotho: 59%  India: 12% Source: Bennell and Akyeampong (2007) DFID
  • 38.
    Being a WomanTeacher in Nepal Social Exclusion of Women Teachers at the Entry Level Factors of Social Exclusion Non-Local Dalit woman Disabled Woman Unmarried Source: Laxmi Paudyal, 2012 http://www.socialinclusion.org.np/new/files/Laxmi%20Paudyal_1365492827dWdb.pdf
  • 39.
    Education in manycountries  Based on centralised systems with limited academic freedom  Poor governance  Teachers as stakeholders have limited voice  Lack of stakeholder involvement  Minimal dialogues
  • 40.
    44% of thecountries have low level of freedom and 33% moderate freedom in managing non- governmental schools.
  • 41.
    Can Open EducationalResources thrive in closed educational settings?
  • 42.
  • 43.
    Strategies should address botheconomic and social issues
  • 44.
    Process-oriented approach “Opening educationalresources is an action that will cause education to move to a new place”. (Breck, 2007:3). and not just as a product
  • 45.
  • 46.
    Phases Characteristics 1 Appropriationability of every stakeholder to have access to the tools of OER. This would not only include the availability of infrastructure, but also the social access to every stakeholder irrespective of class, gender and ethnicity 2 Localization reflects the meaning, position and physical space given to OERs vis-à-vis social, political and cultural values. 3 Incorporation Every stakeholder should have the ability to interact with OER and use them for strengthening the educational goals of the community. 4 Conversion The stakeholder is encouraged to look beyond the community and enter into a relationship with the global community. In addition, the stakeholder is also influencing the structure and functions of OER. Domestication of OER
  • 47.
    Localisation: principles  Involvelocals  A community of practice bolsters localisation  Must be done in appropriate formats  Understand local contexts http://gradworks.umi.com/3450142.pdf Localization of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Nepal: Strategies of Himalayan Knowledge-Workers Tiffany Zenith Ivins March 2011
  • 48.
    Emphasis on Governance Peoplehave a say in the development of these ideas and meanings because they are able to participate in their creation, growth, and spread.
  • 49.
     Participatory approach Decentralised organisational structures  Learner centricity
  • 50.
    Re-defining OER  Thephenomenon of OER/OLR is an empowerment process, facilitated by technology in which various types of stakeholders are able to interact, collaborate, create and use materials and pedagogic practices, that are freely available, for enhancing access, reducing costs and improving the quality of education and learning at all levels.
  • 51.
    From ‘divide’ to‘dividend’  emphasis on people, rather than on technologies  knowledge as a social product emerging as an interface of machine, individual, society  learning as a process of knowledge creation
  • 52.
  • 54.
    Paris Declaration onOER Advocacy Capacity Policy Research Photo:CC-BYDavideStorti The 2012 Paris OER Declaration drafting group at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France
  • 55.
    OER : openschooling Schools Teachers Consultants Ministries of Education Frances Ferreira
  • 56.
    Teacher Education Global Demandfor Teachers: 1.7 million  strengthening teacher education through the use of technology and distance learning.  350,000 teachers and teacher educators trained in 24 countries.  reaching teachers in marginalised groups including nomadic communities Dr. Abdurrahman Umar Education for All (The Dakar Goals)
  • 57.
    The Virtual Universityfor Small States of the Commonwealth Disaster management Sustainable agriculture Business & Entrepreneurship John Lesperance
  • 58.
    Technical & Vocational SkillsDevelopment Impact – 150% increase in income Alison Mead Richardson TVET Institutions TVET Teachers TVET Students Outcomes
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 61.
    The COL Approach Encourages participation and wider stakeholder engagement  Uses a range of appropriate technologies  Takes a holistic approach
  • 62.
    How can technology-enhanced learning reach the digitally deprived and socially excluded?  transform closed educational systems?  accelerate progress towards achieving development goals such as MDGs and EFAs?
  • 63.