Network
Measurements &
Internet Freedom
by
Mahmood Enayat &
Moses Karanja
Our Objectives
● To map the state of internet freedom across the East Africa region - specifically
in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania and South Sudan.
● To explore the relationship between internet freedom, digital security, and the
work of East African civil society.
● To begin to assess the relationship between internet infrastructure and internet
freedom.
Using the African
Declaration
Rating Digital
Resilience
Network Measurements // Key Findings
● Using the network-monitoring tools OONI Probe and Centinel on
selected ISPs in the four countries, we tested for censorship and
surveillance for 90 days between 1 December 2016 and 28
February 2017.
● Using the data collected, we classified the findings to get a better
understanding of how information controls in the research countries
compare.
○ ‘Websites Blocked’ captures the total number of websites that
are unavailable on the networks tested during the research
period.
○ ‘Middle Boxes Discovered is the cumulative instances in
which we detected internet traffic manipulation tools on the
tested networks.
Network Measurements // Key Findings
0
9
9
What Are Middle Boxes?
Governments, ISPs and Information Controls
Lessons Learnt
Positives
Huge demand for evidence-led work on Internet, public policy and human rights.
Mobile network testing now a possibility.
Negatives
Very few volunteers for this kind of research.
Self-censorship affects commentary of results from affected organizations
Recommendations
Improved monitoring tools: Research quality depends on consistency of many
moving parts.
Intuitive data analysis functions a clear need in the ecosystem: Access to raw
data still limited to technical researchers.
More investment in this research: volunteers to host probes, ISPs and business
community to support researchers and other relevant partners. The health of the
Internet affects all of us.
Conclusions
● This report has demonstrated the necessity for civil society to mobilise
itself in defence of internet freedom across East Africa.
● There is a clear need to continue to establish and foster a strong digital
security community that CSOs can turn to to receive training and
support.
● Private sector stakeholders will be central to the struggle for freedom of
expression online - they are the ones who ultimately will be responsible
for enforcing any internet control mechanisms.

Assessing Internet Freedom and the Digital Resilience

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Our Objectives ● Tomap the state of internet freedom across the East Africa region - specifically in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania and South Sudan. ● To explore the relationship between internet freedom, digital security, and the work of East African civil society. ● To begin to assess the relationship between internet infrastructure and internet freedom.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Network Measurements //Key Findings ● Using the network-monitoring tools OONI Probe and Centinel on selected ISPs in the four countries, we tested for censorship and surveillance for 90 days between 1 December 2016 and 28 February 2017. ● Using the data collected, we classified the findings to get a better understanding of how information controls in the research countries compare. ○ ‘Websites Blocked’ captures the total number of websites that are unavailable on the networks tested during the research period. ○ ‘Middle Boxes Discovered is the cumulative instances in which we detected internet traffic manipulation tools on the tested networks.
  • 7.
    Network Measurements //Key Findings 0 9 9
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Governments, ISPs andInformation Controls
  • 10.
    Lessons Learnt Positives Huge demandfor evidence-led work on Internet, public policy and human rights. Mobile network testing now a possibility. Negatives Very few volunteers for this kind of research. Self-censorship affects commentary of results from affected organizations
  • 11.
    Recommendations Improved monitoring tools:Research quality depends on consistency of many moving parts. Intuitive data analysis functions a clear need in the ecosystem: Access to raw data still limited to technical researchers. More investment in this research: volunteers to host probes, ISPs and business community to support researchers and other relevant partners. The health of the Internet affects all of us.
  • 12.
    Conclusions ● This reporthas demonstrated the necessity for civil society to mobilise itself in defence of internet freedom across East Africa. ● There is a clear need to continue to establish and foster a strong digital security community that CSOs can turn to to receive training and support. ● Private sector stakeholders will be central to the struggle for freedom of expression online - they are the ones who ultimately will be responsible for enforcing any internet control mechanisms.