Download to read offline
Uploaded byAFC Leuven
AFC Café STST - Bart De Moor (KU Leuven)
The document discusses the challenges and strategies related to the exploitation of research and technology transfer, highlighting the disparity between excellent research output and insufficient technology transfer in Europe. It presents data on R&D investment percentages, the number of patents filed, and the establishment of spin-off companies from research collaborations. The document emphasizes the importance of partnerships and funding in promoting innovation and effective tech transfer within various sectors.
More Related Content
![[H2020] New Horizon of European Robotics and Cognitive Systems](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/iarp-iros2013-ec-1-131202035159-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Similar to AFC Café STST - Bart De Moor (KU Leuven)
AFC Café STST - Bart De Moor (KU Leuven)
- 3. “Exploitation of research, technologyand know how transfer” Bart De Moor, chairman IRF (IOF)
- 4. General Assembly IndustrialResearch Fund Fuel for Future Tech Transfer 29 May 2009
- 5. Lisbon: R&D investmentsin % GRP 1% 2% 1,03 DE BE 0,40 1,75 DE 1,52 FL 1,33 BE 0,69 EU25 1,84 DK 0,57 0,56 FL 2,45 FI 0,80 0,77 DK 1,34 FR FI 0,20 0,77 IE 0,81 FR 0,00 1,01 NL 0,40 IE 1,30 UK 0,75 NL 1,91 US 0,68 UK 2,65 JP 0,89 0,86 JP US 0,60 1,26 EU25 0,80 1,00 1,20 0,00 Public investment in R&D in % GRP 0,50 1 ,00 1 ,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 Companies investment in R&D in % GRP 1.600 miljoen euro 1.400 If in 2014: 1 % GRP to public R&D Then needed +230 mio euro/year from 2010 ! 1.200 1.000 800 600 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 jaar 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
- 6. Human research potential JP 5,5 NL 5,0 16,2 DK FI 8,6 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0 14,0 16,0 18,0 21,0 UK 7,3 IE 24,2 22,2 FR 12,5 DK 8,4 BE 11,0 EU25 12,2 0,0 5,0 1 0,0 1 5,0 20,0 5,0 1 0,0 1 5,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 Highereducation share / 100 adults (25-64) (2003) 10,9 US 21,3 0,0 13,2 JP DE 29,0 EU25 # researchers / 1000 employees (2003) NL 24,0 BE 5,4 4,0 31,9 DE 7,9 BE 33,2 DK 6,3 DE 23,2 FR FI 2,0 26,3 IE 6,8 0,0 27,5 NL FR EU25 29,2 UK 5,1 IE 38,4 US 9,0 UK 37,4 JP 10,1 US 25,0 STEM masters / 1000 20-29 year (2003) 30,0
- 7. Entrepreneurship 14,0 12,0 VL 10,0 BE 8,0 DU FR 6,0 NL UK 4,0 USA 2,0 0,0 2001 2002 2004 2005 Total Entrepreneurial Activity(GEM) European paradox: Research excellent, Tech transfer insufficient !
- 9. From basic researchto tech transfer Fase 1 Direct Contract Research Fase 2 FFF spinoff NV KUL Research group Research Basic BOF Strategic IOF BA/VC Valorisation Patents Licenses FP6/7 SME founders employees
- 10. IPTEC Award 2006 Stanford 2007Tsinghua 2008 Leuven
- 11. Examples of technologytransfer
- 12. Research collaboration: results •95 million euro income from research collaboration • 1,263 new agreements (2010) 1400 1263 1200 1051 981 1000 812 800 598 600 463 400 200 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
- 13. Intellectual property: results •146 patent applications in 2010 – 454 active patent families – 44 PCTs In numbers 2010 Reported findings 180 Priority submissions 146 New patents 22 • 53 million euro license-income
- 14. Spin-off companies: results(1) Cumulative number of spin-offs created 100 90 80 70 60 50 Total no. of active spinoffs 40 30 Total no. of spin-offs 20 10 0 • 92 spin-off companies started, 80 still active; together +/- 3,000 employees (numbers 2010) • 6 successful flotations (IPOs)
- 15. Spin-off companies: results(2) Euro
- 16. Networks • Stimulating knowledgeexchange and partnering with other high-tech businesses (both SMEs and large companies) and innovation actors
- 17. Networks • Vertical networks: –DSP Valley – LSEC • Thematic centres: – – – – – – CD3 L-MRC L-MTC LICT PharmAbs NERF
- 18. Science parks, businesscentres & incubators • • • • • • • • • • • • Science Park Arenberg Science Park Haasrode Science Park Termunck Science Park Waterschei - Genk Science Park Tienen Ubicenter Campus Remy Business Centre Leuven Bio-Incubator Leuven Biogenerator Tienen Innovation- & Incubation Centre KU Leuven (I&I) Innovation- & Incubation Centre Kortrijk (IICK)
- 20. Funding FP7 Size of project(small to large) IDEAS PEOPLE FWO GOA IDO COOPERATION IWT - SBO Innovation-project EU IWT – O&O IWT – SBO IOF voortraject (m. f.) OT Type of research (basic to applied) SMEs CIP Kennisplatformen Hefboomprojecten Mandaten IWT - OZM
- 21. General: IOF -parameters Decree Flemish Government IOF Parameters Weight ’04 % Doctorates 25 Public/cit. 25 IWT projects 10 EU FP 10 Patents 10 Spin-offs 10 Scientific. Staff 10
- 22. General: IOF -parameters Decree Flemish Government IOF Parameters Weight ’04 % Weight ’12 % Doctorates 25 15 Public/cit. 25 15 IWT projects 10 30* EU FP 10 10 Patents 10 15 Spin-offs 10 15 Scientific. Staff 10 0
- 23. IOF / IRF Projecttypes: - leverage platforms - knowledge building platforms People: - industrial research fellows
- 25. Industrial Research Fellows •Support strategic basic research, research plan with valorisation initiatives, industry bridger, TTO - research group(s) linker • PhD, preferably 2 years postdoc experience • Valorization expertise and support Networking, IP follow up, innovation initiator, negotiations • Project application and management – IWT projects with industry – EU projects (7th FP) Specific Period Permanent position Next submission date Budget 2 x / year € 125 000 / year, benchfee incl.
- 26. Industrial Research Fellows •New type of long-term research/management profile ! • Support innovative research • Undertake valorization initiatives which lead to – Patent applications and grants – Spin-off creation – Contract / licensing / service agreements ~ industrial revenues – Contacts and collaboration with industry • Guarantee continuity via project financing en follow-up – Industrial and IWT projects – EU projects … in agreement with promoter
- 27. Industrial Research Fellows •Selection – Call • General application procedure • IOF-vacancy call – Criteria – Pre-selection – Defence & final selection • Permanent position – Evaluation procedures – Promotion possibilities (up to high level ~ professorship)
- 28. Leverage projects • Short-termfeasability studies • Bringing scientific concept or technology to point of transferability • Focused and Feasible • Clear valorization potential • Direct follow-up financing or return – Patent application - licensing – Spinoff : ready to start business plan – Create potential for industrial collaboration or large EU initiative – Leverage to Knowledge Platform – Other Specific Period 1 year Next submission date Budget X 2 / year € 50 000 - 100 000
- 29. Knowledge Platforms • Multidisciplinaryconsortia • High level strategic basic research • Knowledge consortium with valorisation potential • Answer to industrial demand or new market • Interaction platform with market / users • Role postdoc(s) Specific Period 4 years Next submission date Budget € 150 000-200.000 / year Intention & Application: 2 x / year
- 30. Calls vs Grants Applications Grants Leverageprojects Applications Grants IOF Fellows Call 2006 41 14 Call 2005 40 8 Call 2007 54 16 Call 2006 6 3 Call 2008 30 10 Call 2007 9 4 Call 2009 17 4 Call 2008 14 7 Total Leverage Projects 142 48 Total M 69 21 ° one terminated due to ZAP position Knowledge Platforms Appl Projects Approx. budget % Call 2006 21 6 Call 2007 10 4 LP 142 48 16 Call 2008 10 5 KP 41 15 47 Total KP 41 15 M Total 69 252 21 84 37 100 Total budget 2004-2008: 23,5 Mj Euro
- 33. The 7 spheresof succesful products Information Energy Culture Social Materials Life Environment
- 34.
- 36.
- 53.