BMGT 311: Chapter 13
Implementing Basic Differences Tests
1
Learning Objectives
• To learn how differences are used for market segmentation decisions
• To understand when t tests or z tests are appropriate
• To be able to test the differences between two percentages or means for two
independent groups
• To know what a paired samples difference test is and when to use it
• To comprehend ANOVA and how to interpret ANOVA output
2
3
Why Differences are Important
• Market segmentation is based on differences between groups of consumers.
• One commonly used basis for market segmentation is the discovery of
differences that are the following:
• Statistically significant
• Meaningful
• Stable
• Actionable differences
4
Why Differences Are Important
Market Segmentation
• Differences must be statistically significant: the differences found in the
sample(s) truly exist in the population(s) from which the random samples are
drawn.
• Differences must be meaningful: one that the marketing manager can
potentially use as a basis for marketing decisions.
• Differences should be stable: one that will be in place for the foreseeable
future.
• Differences must be actionable: the marketer can focus various marketing
strategies and tactics, such as product design or advertising, on the market
segments to accentuate the differences between segments.
5
Testing for Significant Differences
Between Two Groups
• Statistical tests are used when researcher wants to compare the means or
percentages of two different groups or samples.
• t Test: statistical inference test to be used with small sample sizes (n ≤ 30)
• z Test: statistical inference test to be used when the sample size is 30 or
greater
• Note: Most computer statistical programs report only the t value because
it is identical to the z value with large samples.
6
Differences Between Percentages with Two Groups
(Independent Samples)
• Independent samples are treated as representing two potentially different
populations.
• Null hypothesis: the hypothesis that the difference in the population
parameters is equal to zero
• With a differences test, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference
between the percentages (or means) being compared.
• Significance of differences between two percentages: alternative to the null
hypothesis is that there is a true difference between the population
parameters.
7
8
Differences Between Percentages with Two Groups
(Independent Samples)
• Formula for Standard Error of Percentages:
• Sp1-p2 = Square Root ((p1 x q1)/n1 + (p2 x q2/n2))
9
How Do You Know When the Results Are
Significant?
• If the null hypothesis is true, we would expect there to be n0 differences
between the two percentages.
• Yet we know that, in any given study, differences may be expected due to
sampling error.
• If the null hypothesis were true, we would expect 95% of the z scores
computed from 100 samples to fall between +1.96 and −1.96 standard errors.
10
How Do You Know When the Results Are
Significant?
• If the computed z value is greater than +1.96 or −1.96, it is not likely that the
null hypothesis of no difference is true. Rather, it is likely that there is a real
statistical difference between the two percentages.
11
Example: Page 330
• Last year a Harris Poll showed 40% of surveyed companies were coming to
college campuses to hire seniors (n = 300 companies surveyed).
• This year, the Harris Poll reported the percentage is 65% (n = 100 companies
surveyed).
• Is this a significant difference?
12
Example: Page 330
• Applying the formula: P1 = 65 and P2 = 40, n1 = 100, n2 = 300
• z = 4.51
• Since the z value is greater than +1.96, the difference between the two
percentages is significant.
13
In Class Example #1
• Is there a significant difference?
• Last year a Point Park Poll showed
75% of surveyed companies were
coming to college campuses to hire
seniors (n = 200 companies
surveyed).
• This year, the Point Park Poll reported
the percentage is 70% (n = 150
companies surveyed).
• Is this a significant difference?
14
In Class Example #1 (Refer to Page 330)
• p1 =
• Q1 =
• n1 =
• p2 =
• Q2 =
• n2 =
• z =
• Last year a Point Park Poll showed
75% of surveyed companies were
coming to college campuses to hire
seniors (n = 200 companies
surveyed).
• This year, the Point Park Poll reported
the percentage is 70% (n = 150
companies surveyed).
• Is this a significant difference?
15
In Class Example #2
16
In Class Example #2
• Is there a significant difference?
• Last year a Point Park Poll showed
80% of surveyed companies were
coming to college campuses to hire
seniors (n = 400 companies
surveyed).
• This year, the Point Park Poll reported
the percentage is 65% (n = 300
companies surveyed).
• Is this a significant difference?
17
In Class Example #2
• Is there a significant difference?
• Last year a Point Park Poll showed
80% of surveyed companies were
coming to college campuses to hire
seniors (n = 400 companies
surveyed).
• This year, the Point Park Poll reported
the percentage is 65% (n = 300
companies surveyed).
• Is this a significant difference?
• p1 =
• Q1 =
• n1 =
• p2 =
• Q2 =
• n2 =
• z =
18
Testing the Difference
Between Means
• Differences between two means from independent samples
• Differences between three or more means from independent samples
• Differences between paired means
19
Differences Between Means with Two Groups
(Independent Samples)
• The procedure for testing the significance of difference between two means
from two different groups is identical to the procedure for testing two
percentages.
• Equations differ due to the use of a metric (interval or ratio) scale.
20
Differences Between Means with Two Groups
(Independent Samples)
21
An Example: Testing the Difference Between Two
Means (Page 333)
• Do male teens and female teens drink different amounts of sports drinks?
22
An Example: Testing the Difference Between Two
Means
• The difference between males (9 bottles) and females (7.5 bottles) is
significant; z =6.43.
23
Example 3: Testing the Difference Between Two
Means
• x1 = 7
• x2 = 7.5
• s1 = 1.5
• s2 = 1
• n1 = 200
• n2 = 200
• z =
24
Example 4: Testing the Difference Between Two
Means
• x1 = 9
• x2 = 9.5
• s1 = 2
• s2 = 2.5
• n1 = 300
• n2 = 300
• z =
25
Analysis of Variance
• Analysis of variance (ANOVA): used when comparing the means of three or
more groups
• ANOVA is an investigation of the differences between the group means to
ascertain whether sampling errors or true population differences explain their
failure to be equal.
• ANOVA will “flag” when at least one pair of means has a statistically
significant difference, but it does not tell which pair.
• Green flag procedure: If at least one pair of means has a statistically
significant difference, ANOVA will signal this by indicating significance
26
27
28
ANOVA Advantages
• ANOVA has two distinct advantages over performing multiple t tests of the
significance of the difference between means.
• Immediately notifies researcher if there is any significant difference
• Arranges the means so the significant differences can be located and
interpreted easily
29
Post Hoc Tests: Detect Statistically Significant
Differences Among Group Means
• Post hoc tests: options that are available to determine where the pair(s) of
statistically significant differences between the means exist(s)
• Duncan’s multiple range test: provides output that is mostly a “picture” of
what means are significantly different
• The Duncan multiple range test’s output is much less statistical than most
other post hoc tests and is easy to interpret.
30
Differences Between Two Means Within the Same
Sample (Paired Sample)
• You can test the significance of the difference between two means for two
different questions answered by the same respondents using the same scale.
• Paired samples test for the differences between two means: a test to
determine if two means of two different questions using the same scale
format and answered by the same respondents in the sample are significantly
different.
31
Reporting Group Differences Tests to Clients
• Differences may not be obvious to the client, especially if the researcher does
not take care to highlight them.
• Group comparison table: summarizes the significant differences in an efficient
manner
• Reporting of findings has a significant ethical burden for marketing
researchers, as they cannot choose to report only “good news” to clients.
32

More Related Content

PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_13
PPT
Chapter 11 Marketing Reserach , Malhotra
PPTX
Hypothesis testing and parametric test
PPT
Marketing research ch 11_malhotra
PPT
Aron chpt 7 ed effect size f2011
PPTX
Basic Concepts of Inferential statistics
PPT
Power, effect size, and Issues in NHST
PPT
Business Basic Statistics
Bmgt 311 chapter_13
Chapter 11 Marketing Reserach , Malhotra
Hypothesis testing and parametric test
Marketing research ch 11_malhotra
Aron chpt 7 ed effect size f2011
Basic Concepts of Inferential statistics
Power, effect size, and Issues in NHST
Business Basic Statistics

What's hot (19)

ODP
Power, Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, & Academic Integrity
PDF
Business Research Methods PPT - III
PDF
Inferential Statistics
PDF
Factor analysis using spss 2005
PPTX
Sampling and statistical inference
PPT
PPT
Inferential statistics
PDF
Koldijk et. al - 2018 - Detecting Work Stress.pdf
PPTX
Experimental Design
PDF
Data Collection, Sampling, Measurement Concept, Questionnaire Designing-Types
PPT
Emil Pulido on Quantitative Research: Inferential Statistics
PPT
Understanding inferential statistics
PPTX
The t Test for Two Independent Samples
PPTX
Data in science
PDF
Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis
PPTX
Statistical tools in research
PDF
Overview of statistics: Statistical testing (Part I)
PPTX
Machine Learning and Causal Inference
PPTX
2016 Symposium Poster - statistics - Final
Power, Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, & Academic Integrity
Business Research Methods PPT - III
Inferential Statistics
Factor analysis using spss 2005
Sampling and statistical inference
Inferential statistics
Koldijk et. al - 2018 - Detecting Work Stress.pdf
Experimental Design
Data Collection, Sampling, Measurement Concept, Questionnaire Designing-Types
Emil Pulido on Quantitative Research: Inferential Statistics
Understanding inferential statistics
The t Test for Two Independent Samples
Data in science
Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis
Statistical tools in research
Overview of statistics: Statistical testing (Part I)
Machine Learning and Causal Inference
2016 Symposium Poster - statistics - Final
Ad

Viewers also liked (9)

PDF
¿ARCHIVO?
PPS
viva el futboll
PPT
PPS
Bebes Nadadores Diapositivas
PDF
Photoshop Guide
PDF
Bmgt 204 chapter_3
PPS
Refleja[2]. Celebra La Vida.
PPS
El Telefono
PPTX
PROGRAMACION NEUROLINGUISTICA
¿ARCHIVO?
viva el futboll
Bebes Nadadores Diapositivas
Photoshop Guide
Bmgt 204 chapter_3
Refleja[2]. Celebra La Vida.
El Telefono
PROGRAMACION NEUROLINGUISTICA
Ad

Similar to Bmgt 311 chapter_13 (20)

PPTX
tests of significance
DOCX
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
PPT
testing the difference between two means
PPT
ch22-130327014547-phpapp01.ppt
PPTX
Parametric tests seminar
PPT
T Test For Two Independent Samples
PDF
inferentialstatistics-210411214248.pdf
PPTX
Inferential statistics
PPTX
TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE.pptx ests of Significance: Process, Example and Type
PPTX
scope and need of biostatics
PPTX
TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE.pptx
PPT
Research_Methodology_Lecture_literature_review.ppt
PPT
Les5e ppt 08
PDF
Statistical inference: Statistical Power, ANOVA, and Post Hoc tests
PPTX
What is the Independent Samples T Test Method of Analysis and How Can it Bene...
PDF
7- Quantitative Research- Part 3.pdf
PPTX
Parametric tests
PDF
Interpretation
PPT
Statistical Tools
tests of significance
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
testing the difference between two means
ch22-130327014547-phpapp01.ppt
Parametric tests seminar
T Test For Two Independent Samples
inferentialstatistics-210411214248.pdf
Inferential statistics
TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE.pptx ests of Significance: Process, Example and Type
scope and need of biostatics
TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE.pptx
Research_Methodology_Lecture_literature_review.ppt
Les5e ppt 08
Statistical inference: Statistical Power, ANOVA, and Post Hoc tests
What is the Independent Samples T Test Method of Analysis and How Can it Bene...
7- Quantitative Research- Part 3.pdf
Parametric tests
Interpretation
Statistical Tools

More from Chris Lovett (20)

PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_16
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_15
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_14
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_17
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_16
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_15
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_14
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_12
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_11
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_10
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_13
PDF
Marketing research plan project project bmgt 311_at
PDF
Marketing research plan project project bmgt 311
PDF
Bmgt 311 lovett fall_2014_sat
PDF
Bmgt 311 lovett fall_2014_wed
PDF
Bmgt 311 chapter_9
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_12
PDF
Bmgt 411 chapter_11
PDF
Strategic marketing plan project individual project bmgt 411
PDF
Bmgt 411 lovett fall_2014
Bmgt 411 chapter_16
Bmgt 411 chapter_15
Bmgt 411 chapter_14
Bmgt 411 chapter_17
Bmgt 311 chapter_16
Bmgt 311 chapter_15
Bmgt 311 chapter_14
Bmgt 311 chapter_12
Bmgt 311 chapter_11
Bmgt 311 chapter_10
Bmgt 411 chapter_13
Marketing research plan project project bmgt 311_at
Marketing research plan project project bmgt 311
Bmgt 311 lovett fall_2014_sat
Bmgt 311 lovett fall_2014_wed
Bmgt 311 chapter_9
Bmgt 411 chapter_12
Bmgt 411 chapter_11
Strategic marketing plan project individual project bmgt 411
Bmgt 411 lovett fall_2014

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
“The Future of Visual AI: Efficient Multimodal Intelligence,” a Keynote Prese...
PDF
INTERSPEECH 2025 「Recent Advances and Future Directions in Voice Conversion」
PDF
Build Real-Time ML Apps with Python, Feast & NoSQL
PDF
IT-ITes Industry bjjbnkmkhkhknbmhkhmjhjkhj
PPTX
AI-driven Assurance Across Your End-to-end Network With ThousandEyes
PDF
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
PPTX
MuleSoft-Compete-Deck for midddleware integrations
PDF
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
PDF
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
PDF
Early detection and classification of bone marrow changes in lumbar vertebrae...
PDF
A hybrid framework for wild animal classification using fine-tuned DenseNet12...
PDF
MENA-ECEONOMIC-CONTEXT-VC MENA-ECEONOMIC
PPTX
agenticai-neweraofintelligence-250529192801-1b5e6870.pptx
PDF
4 layer Arch & Reference Arch of IoT.pdf
PDF
Lung cancer patients survival prediction using outlier detection and optimize...
PDF
EIS-Webinar-Regulated-Industries-2025-08.pdf
PDF
Planning-an-Audit-A-How-To-Guide-Checklist-WP.pdf
PPTX
Training Program for knowledge in solar cell and solar industry
PDF
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PDF
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf
“The Future of Visual AI: Efficient Multimodal Intelligence,” a Keynote Prese...
INTERSPEECH 2025 「Recent Advances and Future Directions in Voice Conversion」
Build Real-Time ML Apps with Python, Feast & NoSQL
IT-ITes Industry bjjbnkmkhkhknbmhkhmjhjkhj
AI-driven Assurance Across Your End-to-end Network With ThousandEyes
CXOs-Are-you-still-doing-manual-DevOps-in-the-age-of-AI.pdf
MuleSoft-Compete-Deck for midddleware integrations
Introduction to MCP and A2A Protocols: Enabling Agent Communication
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
Early detection and classification of bone marrow changes in lumbar vertebrae...
A hybrid framework for wild animal classification using fine-tuned DenseNet12...
MENA-ECEONOMIC-CONTEXT-VC MENA-ECEONOMIC
agenticai-neweraofintelligence-250529192801-1b5e6870.pptx
4 layer Arch & Reference Arch of IoT.pdf
Lung cancer patients survival prediction using outlier detection and optimize...
EIS-Webinar-Regulated-Industries-2025-08.pdf
Planning-an-Audit-A-How-To-Guide-Checklist-WP.pdf
Training Program for knowledge in solar cell and solar industry
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
Transform-Quality-Engineering-with-AI-A-60-Day-Blueprint-for-Digital-Success.pdf

Bmgt 311 chapter_13

  • 1. BMGT 311: Chapter 13 Implementing Basic Differences Tests 1
  • 2. Learning Objectives • To learn how differences are used for market segmentation decisions • To understand when t tests or z tests are appropriate • To be able to test the differences between two percentages or means for two independent groups • To know what a paired samples difference test is and when to use it • To comprehend ANOVA and how to interpret ANOVA output 2
  • 3. 3
  • 4. Why Differences are Important • Market segmentation is based on differences between groups of consumers. • One commonly used basis for market segmentation is the discovery of differences that are the following: • Statistically significant • Meaningful • Stable • Actionable differences 4
  • 5. Why Differences Are Important Market Segmentation • Differences must be statistically significant: the differences found in the sample(s) truly exist in the population(s) from which the random samples are drawn. • Differences must be meaningful: one that the marketing manager can potentially use as a basis for marketing decisions. • Differences should be stable: one that will be in place for the foreseeable future. • Differences must be actionable: the marketer can focus various marketing strategies and tactics, such as product design or advertising, on the market segments to accentuate the differences between segments. 5
  • 6. Testing for Significant Differences Between Two Groups • Statistical tests are used when researcher wants to compare the means or percentages of two different groups or samples. • t Test: statistical inference test to be used with small sample sizes (n ≤ 30) • z Test: statistical inference test to be used when the sample size is 30 or greater • Note: Most computer statistical programs report only the t value because it is identical to the z value with large samples. 6
  • 7. Differences Between Percentages with Two Groups (Independent Samples) • Independent samples are treated as representing two potentially different populations. • Null hypothesis: the hypothesis that the difference in the population parameters is equal to zero • With a differences test, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the percentages (or means) being compared. • Significance of differences between two percentages: alternative to the null hypothesis is that there is a true difference between the population parameters. 7
  • 8. 8
  • 9. Differences Between Percentages with Two Groups (Independent Samples) • Formula for Standard Error of Percentages: • Sp1-p2 = Square Root ((p1 x q1)/n1 + (p2 x q2/n2)) 9
  • 10. How Do You Know When the Results Are Significant? • If the null hypothesis is true, we would expect there to be n0 differences between the two percentages. • Yet we know that, in any given study, differences may be expected due to sampling error. • If the null hypothesis were true, we would expect 95% of the z scores computed from 100 samples to fall between +1.96 and −1.96 standard errors. 10
  • 11. How Do You Know When the Results Are Significant? • If the computed z value is greater than +1.96 or −1.96, it is not likely that the null hypothesis of no difference is true. Rather, it is likely that there is a real statistical difference between the two percentages. 11
  • 12. Example: Page 330 • Last year a Harris Poll showed 40% of surveyed companies were coming to college campuses to hire seniors (n = 300 companies surveyed). • This year, the Harris Poll reported the percentage is 65% (n = 100 companies surveyed). • Is this a significant difference? 12
  • 13. Example: Page 330 • Applying the formula: P1 = 65 and P2 = 40, n1 = 100, n2 = 300 • z = 4.51 • Since the z value is greater than +1.96, the difference between the two percentages is significant. 13
  • 14. In Class Example #1 • Is there a significant difference? • Last year a Point Park Poll showed 75% of surveyed companies were coming to college campuses to hire seniors (n = 200 companies surveyed). • This year, the Point Park Poll reported the percentage is 70% (n = 150 companies surveyed). • Is this a significant difference? 14
  • 15. In Class Example #1 (Refer to Page 330) • p1 = • Q1 = • n1 = • p2 = • Q2 = • n2 = • z = • Last year a Point Park Poll showed 75% of surveyed companies were coming to college campuses to hire seniors (n = 200 companies surveyed). • This year, the Point Park Poll reported the percentage is 70% (n = 150 companies surveyed). • Is this a significant difference? 15
  • 17. In Class Example #2 • Is there a significant difference? • Last year a Point Park Poll showed 80% of surveyed companies were coming to college campuses to hire seniors (n = 400 companies surveyed). • This year, the Point Park Poll reported the percentage is 65% (n = 300 companies surveyed). • Is this a significant difference? 17
  • 18. In Class Example #2 • Is there a significant difference? • Last year a Point Park Poll showed 80% of surveyed companies were coming to college campuses to hire seniors (n = 400 companies surveyed). • This year, the Point Park Poll reported the percentage is 65% (n = 300 companies surveyed). • Is this a significant difference? • p1 = • Q1 = • n1 = • p2 = • Q2 = • n2 = • z = 18
  • 19. Testing the Difference Between Means • Differences between two means from independent samples • Differences between three or more means from independent samples • Differences between paired means 19
  • 20. Differences Between Means with Two Groups (Independent Samples) • The procedure for testing the significance of difference between two means from two different groups is identical to the procedure for testing two percentages. • Equations differ due to the use of a metric (interval or ratio) scale. 20
  • 21. Differences Between Means with Two Groups (Independent Samples) 21
  • 22. An Example: Testing the Difference Between Two Means (Page 333) • Do male teens and female teens drink different amounts of sports drinks? 22
  • 23. An Example: Testing the Difference Between Two Means • The difference between males (9 bottles) and females (7.5 bottles) is significant; z =6.43. 23
  • 24. Example 3: Testing the Difference Between Two Means • x1 = 7 • x2 = 7.5 • s1 = 1.5 • s2 = 1 • n1 = 200 • n2 = 200 • z = 24
  • 25. Example 4: Testing the Difference Between Two Means • x1 = 9 • x2 = 9.5 • s1 = 2 • s2 = 2.5 • n1 = 300 • n2 = 300 • z = 25
  • 26. Analysis of Variance • Analysis of variance (ANOVA): used when comparing the means of three or more groups • ANOVA is an investigation of the differences between the group means to ascertain whether sampling errors or true population differences explain their failure to be equal. • ANOVA will “flag” when at least one pair of means has a statistically significant difference, but it does not tell which pair. • Green flag procedure: If at least one pair of means has a statistically significant difference, ANOVA will signal this by indicating significance 26
  • 27. 27
  • 28. 28
  • 29. ANOVA Advantages • ANOVA has two distinct advantages over performing multiple t tests of the significance of the difference between means. • Immediately notifies researcher if there is any significant difference • Arranges the means so the significant differences can be located and interpreted easily 29
  • 30. Post Hoc Tests: Detect Statistically Significant Differences Among Group Means • Post hoc tests: options that are available to determine where the pair(s) of statistically significant differences between the means exist(s) • Duncan’s multiple range test: provides output that is mostly a “picture” of what means are significantly different • The Duncan multiple range test’s output is much less statistical than most other post hoc tests and is easy to interpret. 30
  • 31. Differences Between Two Means Within the Same Sample (Paired Sample) • You can test the significance of the difference between two means for two different questions answered by the same respondents using the same scale. • Paired samples test for the differences between two means: a test to determine if two means of two different questions using the same scale format and answered by the same respondents in the sample are significantly different. 31
  • 32. Reporting Group Differences Tests to Clients • Differences may not be obvious to the client, especially if the researcher does not take care to highlight them. • Group comparison table: summarizes the significant differences in an efficient manner • Reporting of findings has a significant ethical burden for marketing researchers, as they cannot choose to report only “good news” to clients. 32