1 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
Briefing Note
Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on
TANGEDCO’s Finances
Date: February 2021
Author: Martin Scherer
Email: martin@aurovilleconsulting.com
To assess the commercial impact of consumer category solar energy systems (rooftop solar under
net feed-in mechanism) by commercial and industrial consumers (C&I) on TANGEDCO as per data
available for FY 2018-19.
All average billing rates for C&I consumers (tariff rates LT V, LT III B, HT I-A and HT II) except for HT
III (commercial) are below TANGEDCO’s average cost of supply.
The current solar net feed-in tariff for consumer category solar energy systems of 2.28 INR/kWh is
60% lower than TANGEDCO’s Average Power Purchase cost with 5.81 INR/kWh (TANGEDCO 2018).
Surplus solar energy from consumer category solar systems avoids transmission costs, contributes
to voltage stability, and possibly defers upgradation of distribution and transmission infrastructure
(CEEW 2019).
Consumer category solar energy systems for all HT and LT C&I consumers reduce TANGEDCO’s cost
of supply. TANGEDCO’s Average Cost of Supply (including Power Purchase Cost, Transmission and
Distribution losses, and fixed costs) for FY 2018-19 stood at INR 8.04 whereas surplus solar energy
supplied to TANGEDCO from consumer category solar energy systems (including Power Purchase
Cost, Distribution losses, and fixed costs) comes at a cost of supply of 3.86 INR/kWh. Solar energy
sourced from consumer category solar energy systems, therefore, represents a reduction in the cost
of supply to TANGEDCO of 52% (refer to Figure 1). This savings are expected to higher in the current
financial year (FY 2020-21) as the Average Cost of Supply for TANGEDCO will have increased. This
assumes that TANGEDCO is recovering its fixed cost of generation for its ongoing power purchase
agreements (PPAs) from demand/fixed charges or that rooftop solar capacity added by C&I consumers
is avoiding the signing of new PPA’s or the addition of TANGEDCO owned new generation capacity.
Purpose
Key messages
2
Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
Figure 1Comparison average cost of supply vs cost of supply of solar energy export to grid from rooftop solar systems
The Tamil Nadu Solar Energy Policy 2019 excludes HT consumers from availing the net feed-in
metering mechanism. This discourages a large segment of industrial, commercial, and institutional
consumers from installing consumer category solar PV plants. The only option available for these HT
consumers for generating solar energy on their premises is to operate the plant under paralleling, in
which any excess generation has to be either curtailed or stored. Further, the parallel operation of a
rooftop solar plant attracts a monthly parallel operation charge (TNERC 2019).
One key driver for excluding HT consumers from the net feed-in mechanism was a perceived revenue
loss in the case of HT consumers installing rooftop solar energy systems. Under the existing cross-
subsidy scheme higher tariff paying consumers are cross-subsidizing lower tariff paying consumers.
The Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (EA 2003) under section 61(g) states that the appropriate Commission
must be guided with the fact that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and,
reduces cross-subsidies. Other sections in the Act (38, 39, 40, 42, 178 (2) (k), (m) & (r) 181 (2) (j), (m),
(p) & (zc)) also refer to cross-subsidies pointing out that cross-subsidies shall be progressively reduced
in the manner as may be specified by the Central Commission or State Commission. Similarly, the
National Tariff Policy 2016 under section 8.3 recommends that ‘subsidies should be targeted effectively
and in a transparent manner’(Ministry of Power 2018).
In the period from 2010 to 2020, tariff petitions were not submitted by TANGEDCO to TNERC for the
years 2011, 2015, 2016, and 2020. The TNERC tariff order of 2017 includes tariffs for the years 2018
and 2019 as well. However, the 2017 tariff order has kept energy and demand/fixed charges stable and
now tariff increase was implemented for 2018 and 2019 (TNERC 2017).
Currently, TANGEDCO recovers its cost of supply from a few consumer tariff categories only. For the
majority of consumers, TANGEDCO bears a loss on every kWh of electricity supplied. In the FY 2012-
13 to FY 2017-18, the average billing rate (ABR) has been consistently lower than the average cost of
supply (ACoS) (Auroville Consulting 2020a).
The Tamil Nadu Solar Energy Policy sets a consumer category solar energy target of 3,600 MW by
2023. As of December 2020 6.87% of this target has been achieved. If the target of 3,600 MW is
achieved by 2023 the solar energy from consumer category solar energy will represent an approximate
4% of the total electricity consumption in Tamil Nadu only (Auroville Consulting 2020b).
Background
3 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
1 
These values have been derived by taking the average annual consumption for each LT and HT consumer category in the
state and simulating the monthly Average Billing Cost.
The impact on TANGEDCO’s net revenue for different solar energy penetration scenarios (25% 50%
and 100% in energy terms) of CI consumers is explored.
A comparison of the financial impact on TANGEDCO between paralleling mechanism and solar net
feed-in mechanism for HT CI consumers is undertaken.
Zero export of surplus solar energy under the paralleling mechanism is assumed.
As per the TANGEDCO, the Average Cost of Supply for FY 2018-19 stood at 8.04 INR/kWh. Assuming
average LT and HT CI consumers the Average Billing Rate (including energy and fixed/demand
charges) for 2 out of the 4 CI consumer categories (tariff rates LT V, LT III B, HT I-A, and HT II) is
below the Average Cost of Supply (refer to Figure 2). The Average Billing Rate includes both electricity
charges and demand/fixed charges.1
The average revenue loss per kWh supplied is highest for the LT III B consumer category with a loss of
INR 1.67 per kWh. For HT III TANGEDCO receives a net billing gain of 1.16 INR/kWh (refer to Figure 3).
Considerations
Results
Figure 2 Comparison TANGEDCOs Average Cost of Supply (ACoS) vs Average Billing Rate (ABR) for CI consumer categories
Figure 3 TANGEDCO’s average revenue gains/losses per kWh supplied to CI consumer categories
4
Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
Figure 4 Impact of different solar energy penetrations of CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s net billing revenue
Comparing the financial impacts on TANGEDCO’s billing revenue between supply from the grid only
(BAU), with the currently available paralleling mechanism and with the net feed-in mechanisms for HT
CI consumer categories for the 100% solar energy penetration scenario, indicates that TANGEDCO
clearly benefits from consumer category solar energy systems for CI consumers. The financially least
attractive option to TANGEDCO is the Busines as Usual case (supply from the grid only). The benefits
to TANGEDCO are the highest, if the paralleling mechanism were to be replaced with a net feed-in
mechanism (refer to Figure 5).
If the solar net feed-in mechanism with the current net feed-in tariff of 2.28 INR/kWh were made
available for all CI consumers including the HT consumer categories, then TANGEDCO will benefit
from consumer category solar energy systems installed on the premises of CI consumers by reducing
its Average Cost of Supply and by increasing is net billing revenue. The analysis shows, that the higher
the solar energy penetration, the higher the benefits to TANGEDCO (refer to Figure 4). This is on
account of the fact that:
(i) 
for 2 out of the 4 C I consumer categories the Average Cost of Supply is higher than the
Average Billing Rate,
(ii) 
surplus solar energy exported by consumer category solar systems and delivered to another
consumer comes at a cost of 3.86 INR/kWh. This is 52% % below TANGEDCO’s Average Cost
of Supply of 8.04 INR/kWh (refer to Figure 1).
(iii) 
with higher solar energy penetration the units of surplus solar from the consumer category
solar energy systems injected into the grid are expected to increase, thereby increasing the
volume of low-cost solar energy available to TANGEDCO.
The benefits to TANGDCO are the highest for HT CI Consumers, this is on account of the higher
demand charges levied on HT CI consumers as compared to LT CI consumers.
Additional technical and commercial benefits to TANGEDCO such as voltage improvements,
avoided or deferred infrastructure upgradation, reduced working capital requirement or avoided
generation capacity cost has not been quantified in this note.
5 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
Figure 5 Comparison benefits to TANGEDCO for the BAU scenario compared to the 100% solar penetration with paralleling
and with net feed-in mechanism
Under the current schedule of tariffs, the adaptation of consumer category solar energy systems by CI
consumers presents an opportunity rather than a threat to TANGEDCO to reduce its cost of supply and
improve its billing revenue. Therefore, TANGEDCO is advised to actively facilitate consumer category
solar energy systems for all consumer categories.
In order to make consumer category rooftop solar a winning proposition to TANGEDCO the following
is recommended:
• 
Petition with TNERC to permit all consumers at all voltage levels under the net feed-in mechanism;
• Ensure that the fixed/demand charges cover TANGEDCO’s fixed cost for generation and distribution;
• 
Introduced Time of the Day (ToD) tariffs for both generation (export of surplus solar from consumer
category systems) and consumption;
• Develop a methodology to comprehensively assess the locational benefits and costs of consumer
category solar energy on TANGEDCO;
• Develop utility driven or supported rooftop solar programs (e.g. Utility as RESCO for CI consumers);
• Forecast consumer category solar energy capacity addition and including this forecast in the State’s
generation capacity addition planning;
Conclusions  Recommendations:
6
Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances
/ , Auroville Consulting (2020a). Assessing the impact of Tamil Nadu’s tariff policy on TANGECO’s
financial performance. Sustainable Energy Transformation Series. Available at: https://www.
aurovilleconsulting.com/assessing-the-impact-of-tamil-nadus-electricity-tariff-policy-on-tangedos-
financial-performance/ (Accessed on: 12rf January 20201).
0, Auroville Consulting (2020b). Status of Distributed Solar Energy in Tamil Nadu. Challenges
and Roadmap 2025. Sustainable Energy Transformation Series. Available at: https://www.
aurovilleconsulting.com/roadmap-2025-for-distributed-solar-energy-in-tamil-nadu/ (Accessed on:
12rf January 20201).
1, CEEW. Valuing Grid-connected Rooftop Solar. A Framework to Assess Cost and Benefits to
DISCOMS. Available at: https://www.ceew.in/publications/valuing-grid-connected-rooftop-solar-
framework-assess-cost-and-benefits-discoms (Accessed on 20th January 2021)
2, CERC (2003). The Electricity Act 2003. Available at http://www.cercind.gov.in/act-with-amendment.
pdf (Accessed on 14th January 2021.
3, Ministry of Power (2018). Tariff Policy Resolution. Available at: https://powermin.nic.in/sites/ default/
files/webform/notices/Proposed_amendments_in_Tariff_Policy_0.pdf (Accessed on: 12rf c
January 2021).
4, TANGEDCO (2018). Revenue Account for the Year 2017-18 Available at: https://www.tangedco.
gov.in/linkpdf/profitloss2017-18.pdf (Accessed on: 11rf January 2021)
5, TNERC (2017a). Order in T.P. No.1 of 2017. Determination of Tariff for Generation and
Distribution, Chennai. Available at: http://www.tnerc.gov.in/orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2017/
Tariff Order/TANGEDCO-11-08-2017.pdf (orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2017/TariffOrder/
TANGEDCO-11-08-2017.pdf (Accessed m
l / 2rf H
_l s_p
w0. 0/ ).
6, TNERC (2019b). Order on generic tariff for solar power and related issues. Order No. 5 of 2019
dated 29-03-2019. Available at: http://www.tnerc.gov.in/orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2019/
So¬lar-5-29-03-2019.pdf (accessed on 11rf January 2021)
References

More Related Content

PDF
Making tariff rationalization for domestic consumers a winning proposition fo...
PDF
IMPLEMENTATION MODELS FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR IN TAMIL NADU
PDF
BRIEFING NOTE: COMMUNITY SOLAR FOR DOMESTIC CONSUMERS AS ALTERNATIVE TO ELECT...
PPTX
Attractive Alternative - High grid tariffs drive commercial and industrial us...
PPTX
Ahmendabd presentation 28th nov workshop
PDF
Financing Distributed Solar Energy in Tamil Nadu
PDF
Sustainability 12-10365-v4
PDF
Assessing the techno-commercial impact of distributed solar energy generation.
Making tariff rationalization for domestic consumers a winning proposition fo...
IMPLEMENTATION MODELS FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR IN TAMIL NADU
BRIEFING NOTE: COMMUNITY SOLAR FOR DOMESTIC CONSUMERS AS ALTERNATIVE TO ELECT...
Attractive Alternative - High grid tariffs drive commercial and industrial us...
Ahmendabd presentation 28th nov workshop
Financing Distributed Solar Energy in Tamil Nadu
Sustainability 12-10365-v4
Assessing the techno-commercial impact of distributed solar energy generation.

Similar to BRIEFING NOTE: IMPACT OF ROOFTOP SOLAR BY C&I CONSUMERS ON TANGEDCO’S FINANCES (20)

PPTX
NCSP Community Solar
PPTX
Rooftop Solar: The eco-friendly way to cut your electricity bill
PDF
energies-17-06358-v2.pdfenergies-17-06358-v2.pdf
PDF
energies-17-06358-v2.pdfclass introduction
PDF
BRIEFING NOTE: RECOVERY OF TANGEDCO’S FIXED COSTS FOR GENERATION, DISTRIBUTIO...
PDF
Lazard Levelized cost-of-energy-v100
DOCX
Solar Energy Technology and Incentives
PPTX
Sustainable Development of Taiwan Energy Policy
PDF
Techno_Economic_Analysis_of_Solar_Hybrid_System_for_Residential_Sector.pdf
PDF
Future of solar_power
PDF
Spring 2015 JP Dolphin Final Capstone Project Submission
PDF
Natural group presentation tamil nadu solar energy policy devising cost effec...
PDF
Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Grid Integration Issues
PDF
Study of Grid Integrated SPV System
PPTX
Hannah Masterjohn | Innovation Showcase | 2014 Solar Symposium
PDF
Developing Country Case Study: Retail Pricing and Efficient Deployment of Dis...
DOCX
Renewable Energy Policy Overview
PDF
Community Solar: Overview of an Emerging Growth Market
PDF
Grid Connected Roof Top Solar Power Generation: A Review
PDF
rice_solar_panels
NCSP Community Solar
Rooftop Solar: The eco-friendly way to cut your electricity bill
energies-17-06358-v2.pdfenergies-17-06358-v2.pdf
energies-17-06358-v2.pdfclass introduction
BRIEFING NOTE: RECOVERY OF TANGEDCO’S FIXED COSTS FOR GENERATION, DISTRIBUTIO...
Lazard Levelized cost-of-energy-v100
Solar Energy Technology and Incentives
Sustainable Development of Taiwan Energy Policy
Techno_Economic_Analysis_of_Solar_Hybrid_System_for_Residential_Sector.pdf
Future of solar_power
Spring 2015 JP Dolphin Final Capstone Project Submission
Natural group presentation tamil nadu solar energy policy devising cost effec...
Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Grid Integration Issues
Study of Grid Integrated SPV System
Hannah Masterjohn | Innovation Showcase | 2014 Solar Symposium
Developing Country Case Study: Retail Pricing and Efficient Deployment of Dis...
Renewable Energy Policy Overview
Community Solar: Overview of an Emerging Growth Market
Grid Connected Roof Top Solar Power Generation: A Review
rice_solar_panels
Ad

More from AurovilleConsulting (20)

PDF
Auroville Consulting Annual Sustainability Report (FY 2023-2024)
PDF
Modelling Time-of-Use Electricity Tariffs for Tamil Nadu
PDF
Auroville Consulting Annual Sustainability Report (FY 2022-2023)
PDF
Rajapalayam LPA GHG Emissions Inventory (FY 2021-22)
PDF
ELECTRICITY SUBSIDY AND A JUST ENERGY TRANSITION IN TAMIL NADU
PDF
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRIC...
PDF
MAXIMISING THE BENEFITS OF DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY: AN EVALUATION
PDF
THE CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL OF AUROVILLE
PDF
REACHING 50% ENERGY FROM RENEWABLES BY 2030
PDF
CLEAN ENERGY ACCESS FOR TAMIL NADU’S MSMES
PDF
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT
PDF
THE SOLAR ENERGY-LAND NEXUS SUSTAINABLE LAND USE STRATEGY FOR SOLAR ENERGY IN...
PDF
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR FORESTATION, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU
PDF
PATHWAYS TO DECARBONISATION – MODELLING TAMIL NADU’S POWER SECTOR DECARBONISA...
PDF
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY MAYILADUTHURAI DISTR...
PDF
UNLOCKING OFFSHORE WIND IN TAMIL NADU
PDF
BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIESEL GENERATORS – A COM...
PDF
BRIEFING NOTE: ELECTRIFICATION OF TOP-PERFORMING INDUSTRIES IN TAMIL NADU
PDF
AUROVILLE SMART MINI-GRID | PHASE 2
PDF
MONITORING KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF TANGEDCO
Auroville Consulting Annual Sustainability Report (FY 2023-2024)
Modelling Time-of-Use Electricity Tariffs for Tamil Nadu
Auroville Consulting Annual Sustainability Report (FY 2022-2023)
Rajapalayam LPA GHG Emissions Inventory (FY 2021-22)
ELECTRICITY SUBSIDY AND A JUST ENERGY TRANSITION IN TAMIL NADU
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRIC...
MAXIMISING THE BENEFITS OF DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY: AN EVALUATION
THE CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL OF AUROVILLE
REACHING 50% ENERGY FROM RENEWABLES BY 2030
CLEAN ENERGY ACCESS FOR TAMIL NADU’S MSMES
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT
THE SOLAR ENERGY-LAND NEXUS SUSTAINABLE LAND USE STRATEGY FOR SOLAR ENERGY IN...
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR FORESTATION, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU
PATHWAYS TO DECARBONISATION – MODELLING TAMIL NADU’S POWER SECTOR DECARBONISA...
LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED SOLAR ENERGY MAYILADUTHURAI DISTR...
UNLOCKING OFFSHORE WIND IN TAMIL NADU
BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIESEL GENERATORS – A COM...
BRIEFING NOTE: ELECTRIFICATION OF TOP-PERFORMING INDUSTRIES IN TAMIL NADU
AUROVILLE SMART MINI-GRID | PHASE 2
MONITORING KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF TANGEDCO
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Housing principles for different species of poultry.pptx
PPTX
Noise Pollution and its effects on health and Enviroment
PDF
Impact of tillage methods and nitrogen application rates on soil physical hea...
PPTX
Zero Waste Philippines Recycling and Material Sustainability Programs
PPTX
795585699-Drug-interactiokkkkkkkkkkkkkns.pptx
PPTX
Black Minimal Nature Beautiful Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Env107 Presentation Slides done under NLQ
PDF
Ethiopia's third national communication to UNFCCC.pdf
PDF
ENVIRONMENT & ECOLOGY with MCQ with newdata
PPTX
Ecological Agriculture principles...pptx
PDF
Environment_Ecology_and_Biodiversity_for_all_competitive_exams.pdf
PPTX
climate change (environmental studies).pptx
PPTX
Forest and wildlife Presentation for the students
PPT
vdocument.in_site-planning-by-kevin-lynch.ppt
PPTX
MITIGATION OF HUMAN – WILDLIFE CONFLICT - Copy.pptx
PPTX
Flood management in Bangladesh with respect to the disaster management cycle
PDF
Basics of Toxicology in environmental health perspective.pdf
PPT
地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt
PDF
climate change , causes , effects and mitigation pdf
PPTX
Introduction to ecosystem basics - Module 1
Housing principles for different species of poultry.pptx
Noise Pollution and its effects on health and Enviroment
Impact of tillage methods and nitrogen application rates on soil physical hea...
Zero Waste Philippines Recycling and Material Sustainability Programs
795585699-Drug-interactiokkkkkkkkkkkkkns.pptx
Black Minimal Nature Beautiful Presentation.pptx
Env107 Presentation Slides done under NLQ
Ethiopia's third national communication to UNFCCC.pdf
ENVIRONMENT & ECOLOGY with MCQ with newdata
Ecological Agriculture principles...pptx
Environment_Ecology_and_Biodiversity_for_all_competitive_exams.pdf
climate change (environmental studies).pptx
Forest and wildlife Presentation for the students
vdocument.in_site-planning-by-kevin-lynch.ppt
MITIGATION OF HUMAN – WILDLIFE CONFLICT - Copy.pptx
Flood management in Bangladesh with respect to the disaster management cycle
Basics of Toxicology in environmental health perspective.pdf
地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt地信专业英语.ppt
climate change , causes , effects and mitigation pdf
Introduction to ecosystem basics - Module 1

BRIEFING NOTE: IMPACT OF ROOFTOP SOLAR BY C&I CONSUMERS ON TANGEDCO’S FINANCES

  • 1. 1 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances Briefing Note Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances Date: February 2021 Author: Martin Scherer Email: [email protected] To assess the commercial impact of consumer category solar energy systems (rooftop solar under net feed-in mechanism) by commercial and industrial consumers (C&I) on TANGEDCO as per data available for FY 2018-19. All average billing rates for C&I consumers (tariff rates LT V, LT III B, HT I-A and HT II) except for HT III (commercial) are below TANGEDCO’s average cost of supply. The current solar net feed-in tariff for consumer category solar energy systems of 2.28 INR/kWh is 60% lower than TANGEDCO’s Average Power Purchase cost with 5.81 INR/kWh (TANGEDCO 2018). Surplus solar energy from consumer category solar systems avoids transmission costs, contributes to voltage stability, and possibly defers upgradation of distribution and transmission infrastructure (CEEW 2019). Consumer category solar energy systems for all HT and LT C&I consumers reduce TANGEDCO’s cost of supply. TANGEDCO’s Average Cost of Supply (including Power Purchase Cost, Transmission and Distribution losses, and fixed costs) for FY 2018-19 stood at INR 8.04 whereas surplus solar energy supplied to TANGEDCO from consumer category solar energy systems (including Power Purchase Cost, Distribution losses, and fixed costs) comes at a cost of supply of 3.86 INR/kWh. Solar energy sourced from consumer category solar energy systems, therefore, represents a reduction in the cost of supply to TANGEDCO of 52% (refer to Figure 1). This savings are expected to higher in the current financial year (FY 2020-21) as the Average Cost of Supply for TANGEDCO will have increased. This assumes that TANGEDCO is recovering its fixed cost of generation for its ongoing power purchase agreements (PPAs) from demand/fixed charges or that rooftop solar capacity added by C&I consumers is avoiding the signing of new PPA’s or the addition of TANGEDCO owned new generation capacity. Purpose Key messages
  • 2. 2 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances Figure 1Comparison average cost of supply vs cost of supply of solar energy export to grid from rooftop solar systems The Tamil Nadu Solar Energy Policy 2019 excludes HT consumers from availing the net feed-in metering mechanism. This discourages a large segment of industrial, commercial, and institutional consumers from installing consumer category solar PV plants. The only option available for these HT consumers for generating solar energy on their premises is to operate the plant under paralleling, in which any excess generation has to be either curtailed or stored. Further, the parallel operation of a rooftop solar plant attracts a monthly parallel operation charge (TNERC 2019). One key driver for excluding HT consumers from the net feed-in mechanism was a perceived revenue loss in the case of HT consumers installing rooftop solar energy systems. Under the existing cross- subsidy scheme higher tariff paying consumers are cross-subsidizing lower tariff paying consumers. The Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (EA 2003) under section 61(g) states that the appropriate Commission must be guided with the fact that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and, reduces cross-subsidies. Other sections in the Act (38, 39, 40, 42, 178 (2) (k), (m) & (r) 181 (2) (j), (m), (p) & (zc)) also refer to cross-subsidies pointing out that cross-subsidies shall be progressively reduced in the manner as may be specified by the Central Commission or State Commission. Similarly, the National Tariff Policy 2016 under section 8.3 recommends that ‘subsidies should be targeted effectively and in a transparent manner’(Ministry of Power 2018). In the period from 2010 to 2020, tariff petitions were not submitted by TANGEDCO to TNERC for the years 2011, 2015, 2016, and 2020. The TNERC tariff order of 2017 includes tariffs for the years 2018 and 2019 as well. However, the 2017 tariff order has kept energy and demand/fixed charges stable and now tariff increase was implemented for 2018 and 2019 (TNERC 2017). Currently, TANGEDCO recovers its cost of supply from a few consumer tariff categories only. For the majority of consumers, TANGEDCO bears a loss on every kWh of electricity supplied. In the FY 2012- 13 to FY 2017-18, the average billing rate (ABR) has been consistently lower than the average cost of supply (ACoS) (Auroville Consulting 2020a). The Tamil Nadu Solar Energy Policy sets a consumer category solar energy target of 3,600 MW by 2023. As of December 2020 6.87% of this target has been achieved. If the target of 3,600 MW is achieved by 2023 the solar energy from consumer category solar energy will represent an approximate 4% of the total electricity consumption in Tamil Nadu only (Auroville Consulting 2020b). Background
  • 3. 3 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by C&I consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances 1 These values have been derived by taking the average annual consumption for each LT and HT consumer category in the state and simulating the monthly Average Billing Cost. The impact on TANGEDCO’s net revenue for different solar energy penetration scenarios (25% 50% and 100% in energy terms) of CI consumers is explored. A comparison of the financial impact on TANGEDCO between paralleling mechanism and solar net feed-in mechanism for HT CI consumers is undertaken. Zero export of surplus solar energy under the paralleling mechanism is assumed. As per the TANGEDCO, the Average Cost of Supply for FY 2018-19 stood at 8.04 INR/kWh. Assuming average LT and HT CI consumers the Average Billing Rate (including energy and fixed/demand charges) for 2 out of the 4 CI consumer categories (tariff rates LT V, LT III B, HT I-A, and HT II) is below the Average Cost of Supply (refer to Figure 2). The Average Billing Rate includes both electricity charges and demand/fixed charges.1 The average revenue loss per kWh supplied is highest for the LT III B consumer category with a loss of INR 1.67 per kWh. For HT III TANGEDCO receives a net billing gain of 1.16 INR/kWh (refer to Figure 3). Considerations Results Figure 2 Comparison TANGEDCOs Average Cost of Supply (ACoS) vs Average Billing Rate (ABR) for CI consumer categories Figure 3 TANGEDCO’s average revenue gains/losses per kWh supplied to CI consumer categories
  • 4. 4 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances Figure 4 Impact of different solar energy penetrations of CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s net billing revenue Comparing the financial impacts on TANGEDCO’s billing revenue between supply from the grid only (BAU), with the currently available paralleling mechanism and with the net feed-in mechanisms for HT CI consumer categories for the 100% solar energy penetration scenario, indicates that TANGEDCO clearly benefits from consumer category solar energy systems for CI consumers. The financially least attractive option to TANGEDCO is the Busines as Usual case (supply from the grid only). The benefits to TANGEDCO are the highest, if the paralleling mechanism were to be replaced with a net feed-in mechanism (refer to Figure 5). If the solar net feed-in mechanism with the current net feed-in tariff of 2.28 INR/kWh were made available for all CI consumers including the HT consumer categories, then TANGEDCO will benefit from consumer category solar energy systems installed on the premises of CI consumers by reducing its Average Cost of Supply and by increasing is net billing revenue. The analysis shows, that the higher the solar energy penetration, the higher the benefits to TANGEDCO (refer to Figure 4). This is on account of the fact that: (i) for 2 out of the 4 C I consumer categories the Average Cost of Supply is higher than the Average Billing Rate, (ii) surplus solar energy exported by consumer category solar systems and delivered to another consumer comes at a cost of 3.86 INR/kWh. This is 52% % below TANGEDCO’s Average Cost of Supply of 8.04 INR/kWh (refer to Figure 1). (iii) with higher solar energy penetration the units of surplus solar from the consumer category solar energy systems injected into the grid are expected to increase, thereby increasing the volume of low-cost solar energy available to TANGEDCO. The benefits to TANGDCO are the highest for HT CI Consumers, this is on account of the higher demand charges levied on HT CI consumers as compared to LT CI consumers. Additional technical and commercial benefits to TANGEDCO such as voltage improvements, avoided or deferred infrastructure upgradation, reduced working capital requirement or avoided generation capacity cost has not been quantified in this note.
  • 5. 5 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances Figure 5 Comparison benefits to TANGEDCO for the BAU scenario compared to the 100% solar penetration with paralleling and with net feed-in mechanism Under the current schedule of tariffs, the adaptation of consumer category solar energy systems by CI consumers presents an opportunity rather than a threat to TANGEDCO to reduce its cost of supply and improve its billing revenue. Therefore, TANGEDCO is advised to actively facilitate consumer category solar energy systems for all consumer categories. In order to make consumer category rooftop solar a winning proposition to TANGEDCO the following is recommended: • Petition with TNERC to permit all consumers at all voltage levels under the net feed-in mechanism; • Ensure that the fixed/demand charges cover TANGEDCO’s fixed cost for generation and distribution; • Introduced Time of the Day (ToD) tariffs for both generation (export of surplus solar from consumer category systems) and consumption; • Develop a methodology to comprehensively assess the locational benefits and costs of consumer category solar energy on TANGEDCO; • Develop utility driven or supported rooftop solar programs (e.g. Utility as RESCO for CI consumers); • Forecast consumer category solar energy capacity addition and including this forecast in the State’s generation capacity addition planning; Conclusions Recommendations:
  • 6. 6 Briefing Note : Impact of Rooftop Solar by CI consumers on TANGEDCO’s Finances / , Auroville Consulting (2020a). Assessing the impact of Tamil Nadu’s tariff policy on TANGECO’s financial performance. Sustainable Energy Transformation Series. Available at: https://www. aurovilleconsulting.com/assessing-the-impact-of-tamil-nadus-electricity-tariff-policy-on-tangedos- financial-performance/ (Accessed on: 12rf January 20201). 0, Auroville Consulting (2020b). Status of Distributed Solar Energy in Tamil Nadu. Challenges and Roadmap 2025. Sustainable Energy Transformation Series. Available at: https://www. aurovilleconsulting.com/roadmap-2025-for-distributed-solar-energy-in-tamil-nadu/ (Accessed on: 12rf January 20201). 1, CEEW. Valuing Grid-connected Rooftop Solar. A Framework to Assess Cost and Benefits to DISCOMS. Available at: https://www.ceew.in/publications/valuing-grid-connected-rooftop-solar- framework-assess-cost-and-benefits-discoms (Accessed on 20th January 2021) 2, CERC (2003). The Electricity Act 2003. Available at http://www.cercind.gov.in/act-with-amendment. pdf (Accessed on 14th January 2021. 3, Ministry of Power (2018). Tariff Policy Resolution. Available at: https://powermin.nic.in/sites/ default/ files/webform/notices/Proposed_amendments_in_Tariff_Policy_0.pdf (Accessed on: 12rf c January 2021). 4, TANGEDCO (2018). Revenue Account for the Year 2017-18 Available at: https://www.tangedco. gov.in/linkpdf/profitloss2017-18.pdf (Accessed on: 11rf January 2021) 5, TNERC (2017a). Order in T.P. No.1 of 2017. Determination of Tariff for Generation and Distribution, Chennai. Available at: http://www.tnerc.gov.in/orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2017/ Tariff Order/TANGEDCO-11-08-2017.pdf (orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2017/TariffOrder/ TANGEDCO-11-08-2017.pdf (Accessed m l / 2rf H _l s_p w0. 0/ ). 6, TNERC (2019b). Order on generic tariff for solar power and related issues. Order No. 5 of 2019 dated 29-03-2019. Available at: http://www.tnerc.gov.in/orders/Tariff%20Order%202009/2019/ So¬lar-5-29-03-2019.pdf (accessed on 11rf January 2021) References