The Humanitarian IP Program
OVERVIEW

The United States Patent & Trademark
Office (USPTO) has developed a
voluntary, pro-business pilot program to
incentivize the development and
distribution of technology that addresses
humanitarian needs.
BACKGROUND
   Greatest need of humanitarian support
    coincides with breakdowns in the
    market or government structure,
    specifically:
     Impoverished   populations with insufficient
      capital to provide the needed ROI
     Areas lacking appropriate infrastructure

     Countries lacking adequate protection for
      inventions
WHY THE USPTO?
    USPTO is uniquely positioned to help
          address these problems
   Respected leading voice on IP matters
   Working relationship with the authors of
    technological progress
   History of cooperation with industry
   Leverage contacts to develop win-win
    solutions
   Highlight the benefits IP has for
    developing regions
PROPOSAL
   Incentivize and reward patent owners who
    make meaningful contributions to
    humanitarian needs.

   Provide a transferrable voucher for expedited
    processing at the USPTO.

   Recipients may apply the voucher to one of
    their own patents or sell it on the open
    market.
EXTERNAL SUPPORT
USPTO issued a public Request For Comments in Sept
2010. Respondents from industry, academia, and NGOs
were very supportive of the program. USPTO continues
to solicit feedback from stakeholders to address
concerns and ensure success.

   "BIO commends the USPTO for likewise exploring creative and
market-oriented ways to incentivize the development and distribution
of humanitarian technologies, a goal that BIO and its members have
           long shared and are working hard to achieve."

                                   -James Greenwood
                      BIO’s President & CEO
EXTERNAL SUPPORT

  “I enthusiastically support the exploration and intent
 behind the ‘Humanitarian IP program’, as I view it as a
   critical component in a system for accelerating the
delivery of inclusive (pro-poor) innovations (in health and
           agriculture to developing countries).”

                             -Stanley Kowalski
            Professor of Law and Director of
     The International Technology Transfer Institute
              University of New Hampshire
DEFINITIONS
   Humanitarian issue – one significantly
    affecting the public health or quality of
    life of an impoverished population
   Qualifying criteria (roughly):
     Actions that significantly increase usage of
      the technology by an impoverished group to
      address a humanitarian issue
     Actions that make the technology available
      to others for research on a humanitarian
      issue
APPROACH
   Focus on actually delivering life-altering
    treatments/products/services to suffering
    people in need
   Triple Neutral Approach:
       Technology – open to all fields
       Geography – help impoverished people
        anywhere
       Finance – focus on results achieved, not $$
          accommodates all business models
ELIGIBLE TECHNOLOGIES
   Any technology used for humanitarian
    purposes may qualify, such as:
       Health/Life Sciences (e.g. medicines, medical
        devices)
       Chemical (e.g. water purification)
       Mechanical (e.g. mine detector)
       Agriculture (e.g. enhanced crops)
       Energy (e.g. hazardous waste treatment)
       IT (Hardware and Software) (e.g. malaria
        zapper)
       And others…
PROCESS
   Participants will submit prize
    applications describing how they
    have made significant contributions
    to humanitarian goals with their
    patented technology according to
    the program criteria
   Expert judges will evaluate the
    applications
JUDGING MECHANISM
   2-Round Review Process

     Evaluation
               by outside experts with
     backgrounds in technology and
     humanitarian aid

     Finalselections performed by the Patent
     Public Advisory Committee
TIMELINE
   FRN to be published May 2011
   Pilot rollout in 2nd half of FY 2011
PERCEIVED BENEFITS FROM
               IMPACT INVESTING
                INCENTIVIZATION
Average Return Expectations by instrument and region




  “Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class.” J.P.Morgan, Global Research. 29 Nov 2010
SUMMARY
   USPTO program to reward
    humanitarian use of intellectual
    property
   Opportunity to advance U.S. and
    world interests in humanitarian aid
   USPTO uniquely positioned to lead
   Leverages existing forces in
    industry and academia to greater
    effect
CONCLUSION

    In our global economy, progress in even the poorest
countries can advance the prosperity and security of people
  far beyond their borders, including my fellow Americans.
       -President Barack Obama, September 22, 2010
         U.N. Millenium Development Goals Summit

Case For Humanitarian IP Program

  • 1.
  • 2.
    OVERVIEW The United StatesPatent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has developed a voluntary, pro-business pilot program to incentivize the development and distribution of technology that addresses humanitarian needs.
  • 3.
    BACKGROUND  Greatest need of humanitarian support coincides with breakdowns in the market or government structure, specifically:  Impoverished populations with insufficient capital to provide the needed ROI  Areas lacking appropriate infrastructure  Countries lacking adequate protection for inventions
  • 4.
    WHY THE USPTO? USPTO is uniquely positioned to help address these problems  Respected leading voice on IP matters  Working relationship with the authors of technological progress  History of cooperation with industry  Leverage contacts to develop win-win solutions  Highlight the benefits IP has for developing regions
  • 5.
    PROPOSAL  Incentivize and reward patent owners who make meaningful contributions to humanitarian needs.  Provide a transferrable voucher for expedited processing at the USPTO.  Recipients may apply the voucher to one of their own patents or sell it on the open market.
  • 6.
    EXTERNAL SUPPORT USPTO issueda public Request For Comments in Sept 2010. Respondents from industry, academia, and NGOs were very supportive of the program. USPTO continues to solicit feedback from stakeholders to address concerns and ensure success. "BIO commends the USPTO for likewise exploring creative and market-oriented ways to incentivize the development and distribution of humanitarian technologies, a goal that BIO and its members have long shared and are working hard to achieve." -James Greenwood BIO’s President & CEO
  • 7.
    EXTERNAL SUPPORT “I enthusiastically support the exploration and intent behind the ‘Humanitarian IP program’, as I view it as a critical component in a system for accelerating the delivery of inclusive (pro-poor) innovations (in health and agriculture to developing countries).” -Stanley Kowalski Professor of Law and Director of The International Technology Transfer Institute University of New Hampshire
  • 8.
    DEFINITIONS  Humanitarian issue – one significantly affecting the public health or quality of life of an impoverished population  Qualifying criteria (roughly):  Actions that significantly increase usage of the technology by an impoverished group to address a humanitarian issue  Actions that make the technology available to others for research on a humanitarian issue
  • 9.
    APPROACH  Focus on actually delivering life-altering treatments/products/services to suffering people in need  Triple Neutral Approach:  Technology – open to all fields  Geography – help impoverished people anywhere  Finance – focus on results achieved, not $$  accommodates all business models
  • 10.
    ELIGIBLE TECHNOLOGIES  Any technology used for humanitarian purposes may qualify, such as:  Health/Life Sciences (e.g. medicines, medical devices)  Chemical (e.g. water purification)  Mechanical (e.g. mine detector)  Agriculture (e.g. enhanced crops)  Energy (e.g. hazardous waste treatment)  IT (Hardware and Software) (e.g. malaria zapper)  And others…
  • 11.
    PROCESS  Participants will submit prize applications describing how they have made significant contributions to humanitarian goals with their patented technology according to the program criteria  Expert judges will evaluate the applications
  • 12.
    JUDGING MECHANISM  2-Round Review Process  Evaluation by outside experts with backgrounds in technology and humanitarian aid  Finalselections performed by the Patent Public Advisory Committee
  • 13.
    TIMELINE  FRN to be published May 2011  Pilot rollout in 2nd half of FY 2011
  • 14.
    PERCEIVED BENEFITS FROM IMPACT INVESTING INCENTIVIZATION Average Return Expectations by instrument and region “Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class.” J.P.Morgan, Global Research. 29 Nov 2010
  • 15.
    SUMMARY  USPTO program to reward humanitarian use of intellectual property  Opportunity to advance U.S. and world interests in humanitarian aid  USPTO uniquely positioned to lead  Leverages existing forces in industry and academia to greater effect
  • 16.
    CONCLUSION In our global economy, progress in even the poorest countries can advance the prosperity and security of people far beyond their borders, including my fellow Americans. -President Barack Obama, September 22, 2010 U.N. Millenium Development Goals Summit