DevOps vs. ShadowOps (Pulse 2013)

DevOps vs. ShadowOps
Bala Rajaraman, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Michael D. Elder, IBM Senior Technical Staff Member

© 2012 IBM Corporation

Please note

IBM’s statements regarding its plans, directions, and intent are subject to change or
withdrawal without notice at IBM’s sole discretion.
Information regarding potential future products is intended to outline our general product
direction and it should not be relied on in making a purchasing decision.
The information mentioned regarding potential future products is not a commitment, promise,
or legal obligation to deliver any material, code or functionality. Information about potential
future products may not be incorporated into any contract. The development, release, and
timing of any future features or functionality described for our products remains at our sole
discretion.

Performance is based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in
a controlled environment. The actual throughput or performance that any user will experience
will vary depending upon many factors, including considerations such as the amount of
multiprogramming in the user’s job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration,
and the workload processed. Therefore, no assurance can be given that an individual user
will achieve results similar to those stated here.

2

DevOps vs. ShadowOps

 How do business challenges motivate behavior?

 What do we mean by “Shadow Ops”?

 How do you enable DevOps to be more attractive than
ShadowOps?

3

How do business challenges motivate behavior?

Adapt or Disappear

4

4

IT leaders are leveraging the transformational
power of cloud to balance optimization of existing
systems and innovation

IT Innovation
Optimization

• Improve agility & dexterity of • Enable mobile, intelligent
business infrastructure, rapid
development
• Deliver secure IT without Cloud
• Speed delivery of new
boundaries
products & services
• Reduce Risk
• Drive new business models &
client relationships

Processes New models of
client engagement
5
5

Systems of Engagement and Systems of Record

6
6

10 years ago - Then and Now

 Web sites augmented  Web, Mobile, & Social
business revenue, but platforms differentiate,
brick and mortar still engage, and permeate the
dominated customer relationship

 Borders (Bookstore) had  Borders (Bookstore)
revenue of $3.39bln2 doesn’t exist1
– But Amazon still has
great deals!

 Facebook is moving to
 Web sites could be
release to production twice
released over a period of
a day3
months

7

Motivating Use Cases
• LOB need for new solutions to “..get closer to their customers…”
INSURANCE • Address millennial generation of customers and interaction models (social, mobile)
• Enhance current Sales System with a multi-channel integration system that provides for sales (quoting) and
service of all products to Agents, Call Centers and direct to Policyholders

• LOB need for new solutions to engage customers in-store and over web channels
RETAIL • Address customer acquisition, customer retention, customers interaction in-store (coupons, promotions) and metrics
such as average revenue per user (social, mobile, analytics)
• Enhance current retail systems with a multi-channel interaction

• New solutions to engage citizens driven by Smarter Cities & Government
GOVERNMENT
• Address citizen interaction with local government resources (social, mobile, analytics)
& PUBLIC
• Integrate current systems (e.g. work order management systems) with a multi-channel interaction leveraging GPS, GIS and
SECTOR mobile devices

• Making the work environment for sellers & sales managers simpler, social, more integrated, and insightful…”
IBM Social • Applications that utilize CRM tools and integrates IBM Sales tools to deliver an integrated solution
Business • Enhanced with social network mapping and expertise location (e.g. LinkedIn)
• Integrating CRM applications with social, mobile and analytical capabilities

• LOB capabilities for short-term marketing campaigns aligned to events (e.g. sporting events)
MARKETING • Dynamic engagement of customers and end-users (e.g. ASICS “Support Your Marathoner” multimedia campaign at the ING
& SALES NY City marathon)
• Rapid creation of applications and integration with variable demands leveraging social, mobile, multi-media and analytical
capabilities
8

Line of Business Expectations
Search Algorithm Release Process at Google
Release Process at Wealthfront

Release Automation at Etsy
Release Automation at flipkart

9

What is “Shadow Ops”?

Circumventing Central IT
Regardless of Risk
10

10

Ops
Safe
Enterprise
Traditional IT DevOps

Developer

Slow Fast

Public Cloud
“End Around”

Risky
11

Problem: Disparate notions of quality

Ops Developer

Did deployment succeed? Did the app compile?

Are transactions succeeding? Did unit tests pass?

Is performance OK? Did the app get packaged OK?

Any new errors in the logs?

12

Shadow Op 1: Public Infrastructure as a Svc
Use Case Potential Risks
 LOB wants to deliver a new end  Is the remote dev environment
user capability and fast secured?
 Work Request to IT returned with  Has a VPN tunnel been opened
long estimate to stand up OS back into the company network?
 LOB opens account with cloud
 Who handles the outage?
platform
 Do the images in use meet company
 LOB leverages public cloud to
deliver new capability firewall requirements?

Causes Our Point of View
 Image catalog improves time to  Provide a reusable image catalog of
delivery is faster than Work Request compliant OSes to enable
to IT innovation internally
 Leverage configuration scripts to  Support on-demand requests for
automate deployment cloud patterns
 LOB uses OpEx instead of CapEx to  Apply automation to provide re-
control budgets short-term usable services without waiting for
people
13

Shadow Op 2: Public Platform as a Svc
 LOB wants to deliver a new analytic  Is customer data properly secured?
capability capability  Was any security testing done
 LOB wants to leverage Hadoop to against the architecture?
look for user buying trends in  Will we have a bad PR experience
customer data in the event of a breech?
 Developer builds a prototype
leveraging Platform as a Service
on top of Hadoop

 LOB needs to deliver more revenue  Provide a catalog of services to
this quarter provide specific capabilities based
 Not delivering may mean a new GM on business need: Hadoop, Web
next quarter Containers, etc
 Developers unfamiliar with how to  Where it makes sense, ensure any
setup the platform, but know SPI data externally is obfuscated
programming model
14

Shadow Op 3: Public Software as a Svc
 LOB has low survey results from  Is this consistent with the internal
customer interactions CRM solution? (If there was one
 Need a better CRM solution to before this)
improve sales results  Are all SOX-404 rules met w.r.t SPI
 Sign contract with a SaaS CRM  Are other LOBs doing similar
provider things? Same contract terms?

 Long lead time to evaluate,  Apply rigorous automation to help
purchase, and roll out CRM solution roll out new capabilities faster
 We need to drive better results this  Evaluate whether a public SaaS
quarter, not just this year option makes sense for the overall
business and Central IT strategy
and set policies around it

15

Shadow Op 4…n: Your Use Case
 What use cases have you  What risks did you encounter?
observed?

 What were the motivating factors?  Central IT must adopt techniques to
 How much was business driven vs. streamline the delivery process;
technology driven? without these improvements, LOB
will continue doing more “end-
arounds” to meet the business
pressure

16

How can you compete with “Shadow Ops”?

Software Defined Environment

17

17

Enabling DevOps from Central IT

Capabilities and User Experience Today Emerging

Primary Workload Types Transactional Transactional +
Big Data, Analytics, Mobile/Social Channels

Delivery Model Planned Incremental (DevOps)
Development and Operations
Team Sizes 100s and Costly 10s with built-in DevOps automation

Release Frequency Months to Years Days to Weeks, based on business opportunity
Integration Frequency Weeks Continuous

Infrastructure Deployment Days Minutes

Time to Value Planned Opportunistic
Built in to application, Recovery Oriented
Operational Model Systems Management Computing, Continuous Availability
Consume and Assemble
Service Sourcing Develop (Public and Private) 18

Streamline Delivery

Apply changes to deliverables (code, config, patterns, workflows)
Best Practice
Deliver Changes Workflow
Automation

Test
Automation

Production
Configuration
(Code/Scripts)

Virtual Patterns

19

19

Streamline Delivery

Manage Deliverables in a Definitive Media Library
Best Practice
Automation

Test
Automation Manage
Manage
Deliverables
Deliverables

Repository

Production
Configuration
(Code/Scripts)

Virtual Patterns

20

20

Streamline Delivery

Deploy and configure a virtual environment

Manage
Manage Provision
Provision
Deliverables
Deliverables Environments
Environments

Repository Private Cloud

21

21

Streamline Delivery

Test to ensure delivered changes don’t break the application

Provision
Provision Verify
Verify
Environments
Environments Changes
Changes

Private Cloud

22

22

Streamline Delivery

Dashboard test results in common location

Verify
Verify
Changes
Changes

23

23

Streamline Delivery

Promote to production using best practice workflow automation

Monitor &
Monitor &
Maintain
Maintain

24

24

Streamline Delivery

Deliver Changes, Manage Deliverables, Provision, Test, Dashboard, Monitor
Best Practice
Automation

Test
Automation Manage
Manage Provision
Provision Verify
Verify Monitor &
Monitor &
Deliverables
Deliverables Environments
Environments Changes
Changes Maintain
Maintain

Repository Private Cloud

Production
Configuration
(Code/Scripts)

Virtual Patterns

25

25

Where do I start?

Specific Techniques

26

26

Traditional Hand-off – Written Instructions

Installation Instructions

RedHat Linux
1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore
et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut
aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

2. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est
laborum.

Apache Web Server
1. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium
doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore
veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo.

2. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed
quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque
porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur,

3. adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore
magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Python

1. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit
laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur?

2. Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil
molestiae consequatur,

3. vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?

27

Provisioning using a Software Defined Environment

.jsp .html
Infrastructure
.java as Code
.sh chef
recipes

Source Artifacts
Source Control
Management

28

Virtual Images in the Catalog

29

29

Leveraging Reusable Automation

30

30

Conclusion

 Central IT must adapt in order to support business needs

 X as a Service (Infrastructure, Platform, Software etc)
provides greater flexibility to support rapid prototyping and
delivery

 We’re on this journey together

31

Acknowledgements and Disclaimers:
Availability. References in this presentation to IBM products, programs, or services do not imply that they will be available in all
countries in which IBM operates.

The workshops, sessions and materials have been prepared by IBM or the session speakers and reflect their own views. They are
provided for informational purposes only, and are neither intended to, nor shall have the effect of being, legal or other guidance or
advice to any participant. While efforts were made to verify the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in this
presentation, it is provided AS-IS without warranty of any kind, express or implied. IBM shall not be responsible for any damages
arising out of the use of, or otherwise related to, this presentation or any other materials. Nothing contained in this presentation is
intended to, nor shall have the effect of, creating any warranties or representations from IBM or its suppliers or licensors, or altering
the terms and conditions of the applicable license agreement governing the use of IBM software.

All customer examples described are presented as illustrations of how those customers have used IBM products and the results they
may have achieved. Actual environmental costs and performance characteristics may vary by customer. Nothing contained in these
materials is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, stating or implying that any activities undertaken by you will result in any specific
sales, revenue growth or other results.

© Copyright IBM Corporation 2013. All rights reserved.
 U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule
Contract with IBM Corp.
 Please update paragraph below for the particular product or family brand trademarks you mention such as WebSphere,
DB2, Maximo, Clearcase, Lotus, etc

IBM, the IBM logo, ibm.com, [IBM Brand, if trademarked], and [IBM Product, if trademarked] are trademarks or registered trademarks
of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. If these and other IBM trademarked
terms are marked on their first occurrence in this information with a trademark symbol (® or ™), these symbols indicate U.S.
registered or common law trademarks owned by IBM at the time this information was published. Such trademarks may also be
registered or common law trademarks in other countries. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and
trademark information” at www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml
If you have mentioned trademarks that are not from IBM, please update and add the following lines:
[Insert any special 3rd party trademark names/attributions here]
Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.
32

DevOps vs. ShadowOps (Pulse 2013)

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to DevOps vs. ShadowOps (Pulse 2013) (20)

More from Michael Elder (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

DevOps vs. ShadowOps (Pulse 2013)

Editor's Notes