CENTRAL VENOUS
PRESSURE
Dr. Davis Kurian
 Measure RV filling pressure.
 Estimation of intravascular volume status.
 Assessment of RV function
CVP
 Major procedures involving large fluid shifts and/or blood loss.
 Intravascular volume assessment when urine output is not reliable.
 Major trauma.
 Surgeries with high risk of air embolism.
 Frequent venous blood sampling.
 Venous access for vasoactive/irritating drugs & for long term drug
administration.
 Inadequate IV access
 Rapid infusion of IV fluids.
 Transvenous pacing
 Temporary hemodialysis
INDICATIONS
 The distal end of the catheter – in one of the large
intrathoracic veins/ RA.
 Zero point – taken at the centre of RA – important –
height can influence CVP measurement.
 3 upward deflections : a,c,v
 2 downward deflections : x,y
 Trends are more important than individual values.
 Influenced by IVC thrombosis and alterations of
intrathoracic pressure.
MEASUREMENT
WAVEFORM
 Irregular rhythm with loss of a wave – AF/Afl.
 Cannon a waves – junctional rhythm, complete heart block,
ventricular arrythmias, tricuspid stenosis, RVH, pulmonary stenosis,
Pulmonary hypertension.
 Early/holosystolic cannon v waves – significant TR.
 Large v waves – RVF/incompliant ventricle due to ischemia
 Pericardial constriction – decreased venous return – prominent a and
v waves & steep x and y descents (M /Wconfig).
 RV ischemia – tall a and v waves, steep x and y descent.
 Cardiac tamponade – dominant x descent, attenuated y descent
PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
 Site chosen depends on patient condition, skill and
experience of the personnel and the indication.
 Sites chosen include:
 IJV
 SUBCLAVIAN
 EJV
 ANTECUBITAL APPROACH
 FEMORAL VEIN
TECHNIQUES & INSERTION SITES
 1st described by English et.al (1969)
 Advantages:
 High success rate
 Short straight course of vein
 Easy access from head
 Fewer complications
 Easy compressibility in patients with bleeding diathesis.
IJV APPROACH
 Location – under the medial border of lateral head of SCM.
 Right IJV preferred – leads straight to SVC and RA – minimises
injury to thoracic duct, pneumothorax.
 Position :
 Supine with head down position
 Head turned to opposite side
 Techniques:
 Middle approach
 Anterior high approach
 Posterior approach
 USG guided
IJV APPROACH
IJV APPROACH
IJV APPROACH
IJV APPROACH
IJV APPROACH
 USG guided – advantages :
 Minimises injury to carotid artery
 Helps to identify the anatomy
 Especially advantageous in patients with difficult neck
anatomy, prior neck surgeries and anticoagulated
patients.
IJV APPROACH
 Tortuous path – reduced success rate
 Advantages – avoids advancement of needle into
deeper structures.
EJV APPROACH
 Supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach
 High incidence of complications – esp pneumothorax.
 Site of choice in patients undergoing surgeries of
head and neck and in trauma patients immobilised
with cervical collar
 Useful in parentral nutrition/prolonged CVP
monitoring
SUBCLAVIAN VEIN
INFRACLAVICULAR APPROACH
Supine, head down
Folded sheet between scapulae
Head turned to opposite side
SUPRACLAVICULAR APPROACH
 Advantage –
 Decreased complications
 Ease of access
 Disadvantage –
 Difficult to ensure correct central venous placement of
cathether.
 Caridac perforation and arrythmias
ANTECUBITAL VEINS
 Ideally in SVC – parallel to vessel wall – below the
inferior border of clavicle – above 3rd rib, T4 – T5
interspace, azygos vein, tracheal carina and or above
the take off of the right main bronchus.
CONFIRMING CATHETHER POSITION
 Increased success rate
 2 cm below inguinal ligament – medial to pulsation of
femoral artery.
 Increased chances of infection when placed for a long
time , thromboembolic events & vascular injury.
 Especially indicated in patients with SVC obstruction.
FEMORAL VEIN
 ABSOLUTE
 SVC syndrome – CI to upper extremity placement
 Infection at the site of insertion
 RELATIVE
 Coagulopathies
 Newly inserted pacemaker wires
CONTRAINDICATIONS- CENTRAL
VENOUS CANNULATION
 COMPLICATIONS OF CENTRAL VENOUS
CANNULATION
 Arterial puncture with hematoma
 A-V fistula
 Hemothorax, chylothorax, pneumothorax
 Brachial plexus injury
 Horner’s syndrome
 Air embolism
 Catheter/wire shearing
COMPLICATIONS
 COMPLICATIONS OF CATHETHER PRESENCE
 Thrombosis/thromboembolism
 Infection, sepsis, thromboembolism
 Arrythmias
 Hydrothorax
COMPLICATIONS
 KAPLAN’S TEXTBOOK OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA – 4TH EDN
 MILLER’S TEXTBOOK OF ANAESTHESIA – 8TH EDN
REFERENCES
Central venous pressure

Central venous pressure

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Measure RVfilling pressure.  Estimation of intravascular volume status.  Assessment of RV function CVP
  • 3.
     Major proceduresinvolving large fluid shifts and/or blood loss.  Intravascular volume assessment when urine output is not reliable.  Major trauma.  Surgeries with high risk of air embolism.  Frequent venous blood sampling.  Venous access for vasoactive/irritating drugs & for long term drug administration.  Inadequate IV access  Rapid infusion of IV fluids.  Transvenous pacing  Temporary hemodialysis INDICATIONS
  • 4.
     The distalend of the catheter – in one of the large intrathoracic veins/ RA.  Zero point – taken at the centre of RA – important – height can influence CVP measurement.  3 upward deflections : a,c,v  2 downward deflections : x,y  Trends are more important than individual values.  Influenced by IVC thrombosis and alterations of intrathoracic pressure. MEASUREMENT
  • 7.
  • 8.
     Irregular rhythmwith loss of a wave – AF/Afl.  Cannon a waves – junctional rhythm, complete heart block, ventricular arrythmias, tricuspid stenosis, RVH, pulmonary stenosis, Pulmonary hypertension.  Early/holosystolic cannon v waves – significant TR.  Large v waves – RVF/incompliant ventricle due to ischemia  Pericardial constriction – decreased venous return – prominent a and v waves & steep x and y descents (M /Wconfig).  RV ischemia – tall a and v waves, steep x and y descent.  Cardiac tamponade – dominant x descent, attenuated y descent PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
  • 9.
     Site chosendepends on patient condition, skill and experience of the personnel and the indication.  Sites chosen include:  IJV  SUBCLAVIAN  EJV  ANTECUBITAL APPROACH  FEMORAL VEIN TECHNIQUES & INSERTION SITES
  • 10.
     1st describedby English et.al (1969)  Advantages:  High success rate  Short straight course of vein  Easy access from head  Fewer complications  Easy compressibility in patients with bleeding diathesis. IJV APPROACH
  • 11.
     Location –under the medial border of lateral head of SCM.  Right IJV preferred – leads straight to SVC and RA – minimises injury to thoracic duct, pneumothorax.  Position :  Supine with head down position  Head turned to opposite side  Techniques:  Middle approach  Anterior high approach  Posterior approach  USG guided IJV APPROACH
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
     USG guided– advantages :  Minimises injury to carotid artery  Helps to identify the anatomy  Especially advantageous in patients with difficult neck anatomy, prior neck surgeries and anticoagulated patients. IJV APPROACH
  • 17.
     Tortuous path– reduced success rate  Advantages – avoids advancement of needle into deeper structures. EJV APPROACH
  • 18.
     Supraclavicular andinfraclavicular approach  High incidence of complications – esp pneumothorax.  Site of choice in patients undergoing surgeries of head and neck and in trauma patients immobilised with cervical collar  Useful in parentral nutrition/prolonged CVP monitoring SUBCLAVIAN VEIN
  • 19.
    INFRACLAVICULAR APPROACH Supine, headdown Folded sheet between scapulae Head turned to opposite side
  • 20.
  • 21.
     Advantage – Decreased complications  Ease of access  Disadvantage –  Difficult to ensure correct central venous placement of cathether.  Caridac perforation and arrythmias ANTECUBITAL VEINS
  • 22.
     Ideally inSVC – parallel to vessel wall – below the inferior border of clavicle – above 3rd rib, T4 – T5 interspace, azygos vein, tracheal carina and or above the take off of the right main bronchus. CONFIRMING CATHETHER POSITION
  • 23.
     Increased successrate  2 cm below inguinal ligament – medial to pulsation of femoral artery.  Increased chances of infection when placed for a long time , thromboembolic events & vascular injury.  Especially indicated in patients with SVC obstruction. FEMORAL VEIN
  • 24.
     ABSOLUTE  SVCsyndrome – CI to upper extremity placement  Infection at the site of insertion  RELATIVE  Coagulopathies  Newly inserted pacemaker wires CONTRAINDICATIONS- CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION
  • 25.
     COMPLICATIONS OFCENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION  Arterial puncture with hematoma  A-V fistula  Hemothorax, chylothorax, pneumothorax  Brachial plexus injury  Horner’s syndrome  Air embolism  Catheter/wire shearing COMPLICATIONS
  • 26.
     COMPLICATIONS OFCATHETHER PRESENCE  Thrombosis/thromboembolism  Infection, sepsis, thromboembolism  Arrythmias  Hydrothorax COMPLICATIONS
  • 27.
     KAPLAN’S TEXTBOOKOF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA – 4TH EDN  MILLER’S TEXTBOOK OF ANAESTHESIA – 8TH EDN REFERENCES