CES 2016.02: Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers
Mauricio Lema Medina MD
Mauricio Luján Piedrahíta, MD
Acknowledgments
Second cause of cancer death in the US
The incidence has decreased recently (in the US) due to screening
Mortality has decreased by about 25%
POLYPS
Grossly visible protrusion fro the mucosal surface
Nonneoplastic hamartoma
Hyperplastic mucosal proliferation (hyperplastic polyp)
Adenomatous polyps
Clearly preneoplastic
Only a minority of polyps progress to cancer
High prevalence: 30% and 50% in middle-aged and elderly adults
Only 1% become malignant
Multistep molecular evolution through cancer
Colon cancer is thought to arise from sequential DNA derrangements in a polyp
These may include: Point mutations in the K-ras (KRAS) oncogene
Hypomethylation of DNA
Allelic loss of a TSG like 5q (APC), 18q (DCC), 17p (p53)
Oncogene activation
Loss of tumor suppression activity
Multi-stage carcinogenesis in colon cancer
Inspired on: Vogelstein B, 1990
MAPK pathway (activating) mutations occur in about 60% CRC
KRAS: 40-50%
NRAS: 10%
BRAF: 8%
POLYPS
Pedunculated
Flat-based: sessile Higher risk of cancer development
Tubular
Villous
Tubulovillous
Higher risk of cancer development (3x)
Small (1.5 cm, or less)
Intermediate (1.5-2.5 cm)
Substantial (2.5 cm, or more)
(2-10% cancer risk)
(10% cancer risk or more)
The entire bowel should be visualized (1-3 risk of synchronous polyps).
Follow-up with colonoscopies: 30-50% risk of another adenoma
Adenomas become cancer in about 5 years
Colonoscopy need not be more frequent than every 3 years
Once a poly is found
Risk factors for the development of colorectal cancer
Diet: animal fat Hereditary syndromes
Inflammatory bowel diseaseStreptococcus bovis bacteremia
Upper socioeconomic populations
Correlates with per capita consumption of calories,
meat protein, dietary fat and oil, high cholesterol,
high coronary artery disease
Dietary fats change in the microbiome (anaerobes),
converting bile-acids into carcinogens
High-calorie intake / inactivity cause obesity: insulin
resistance, increase in IGF-1, more polyps (and
cancer)
Fibers and vegetable intake have no been proven to
prevent CRC development
Up to 25% have a family history
Polyposis coli
MYH-associated polyposis
Nonpolyposis syndromes (Lynch)
More with ulcerative colitis
Rare during first 10 years
Thereafter: 1%/yr incidence
Prophylactic colectomy for long active IBD
For unknown reason
Consider upper and lower GI endoscopies
Hereditary syndromes
Polyposis coli
Thousands of adenomatous polyps through the large bowel
Autosomal dominant
Deletion of 5q
Loss of the APC gene (a TSG)
Gardner’s syndrome
Soft-tissue and bony tumors
Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal epithelium
Mesenteric desmoid tumors
Ampullary carcinomas
Polyposis coli
Turcot’s syndrome
Malignant tumors of the Central Nervous system
Polyposis coli
Polyps are rare before puberty
But are detectable in most by age 25
Cancer will develop in (almost) all by 40
Once multiple polyps develop, total colectomy must be performed
Offspring of affected patients have 50% risk of disease
Flexible sigmoidoscopy until 35 should be performed
Germ-line APC mutation detection should be considered
Hereditary syndromes
Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) - Lynch’s syndrome
Three or more relatives with documented colorectal cancer;
one who is a first-degree relative of the other two;
CRC before 50 in at least one;
Spanning at least 2 generations.
Autosomal dominant
Median-age at CRC diagnosis: less than 50
Screening colonoscopy starting on age 25 (q1 to 2 years),
with pelvic US/endometrial biopsy for women
Poorly-differentiated
Mucinous histologies
Right-sided preference
BETER PROGNOSIS
Association with other malignancies (in the family)
Ovarian or endometrial carcinomas in women
Gastric, small-bowel, pancreaticobiliary, genitourinary cancers
sebaceus skin tumors
Lynch’s syndrome is associated with mutations of several genes
hMSH2 (chromosome 2)
hMLH1 (chromosome 3), and others
Unable to repair DNA mismatches (MMR)
High frequency of microsatellite instability
Colorectal cancer: presenting symptoms
Right-sided colon tumors
May be very large without symptoms
Iron-deficiency anemia is characteristic
Left-sided tumors
Abdominal cramping
Intestinal obstruction
Intestinal perforation
Rectosigmoid tumors
Hematochezia
tenesmus
narrowing of the caliber of stool
(similar to hemorrhoids)
Anemia is rare
CRC: Staging, prognostic factors, and pattern of spread
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Predictors of poor outcome following total surgical resection in CRC
Tumor spread to regional lymph nodes
Number of lymph nodes involved
Tumor penetration to through the bowel wall
Poorly differentiated histology
Perforation
Tumor adherence to adjacent organs
Venous invasion
Preoperative CEA elevation
Aneuploidy
Specific chromosomal deletion (BRAF mutation, absence of MSI)
CRC: Staging, prognostic factors, and pattern of spread
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Adenocarcinoma
CRC: Staging
AJCC TNM, 7th Ed, 2010
CRC: Staging
AJCC TNM, 7th Ed, 2010
CRC: Staging, prognostic factors, and pattern of spread
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
High-risk stage II
T4
Perforation
Obstruction
Lymphovascular invasion
non-R0 resection
Less than 12 lymph nodes evaluated
High-risk recurrence score (in MSS)
CRC: pattern of spread
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Most recurrences occur within 4 years of surgery
At least 12 lymph nodes need to be evaluated to establish prognosis
TNM/Stage is prognostic
Regional
lymph nodes
Supraclavicular
lymph nodes
Liver metastases
Initial site of spread in 1/3
Involved at death in 2/3
Median survival of metastatic CRC is
improving: about 2-3 years (2016)
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Pre-surgical work-up
H&P
Basic labs, including LFTs, CEA
Thorax, abdomen and pelvis contrast-enhanced CT
Full-length colonoscopy
Surgery
Colectomy with regional lymph-node dissection
Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with regional lymph-node dissection
At least 12 lymph-nodes need to be assessed
Surgery in symptomatic patients, regardless of metastases
Adequate surgical margins needed to avoid recurrence in the anastomotic site
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Colon cancer (non-rectal)
Surgery
Stage I
Follow-up
Low-Risk
Stage II
Follow-up
High-Risk
Stage II/Stage III
Stage IVa
Resectable
Stage IVa
Convertible
Stage IVb
Surgery
ChemoT PalliativeCT
Follow-up Follow-up Follow-up
AdjChemoT
Surgery
AdjChemoT
Surgery Surgery
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer
Ideally, start within 1 month of surgery, for 6 months
Improves survival by 30% in stage III CRC patients
May improve survival in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients
Based on Fluorouracil (5-FU)
Infusional 5-FU both more effective, and less toxic, than bolus
Modulation with Folinate (Leucovorin, LV) improves outcomes
Addition of Oxaliplatin improves DFS and OS in stage III patients (ie, FOLFOX)
Unclear benefit of Oxaliplatin in stage II and older than 70
No benefit of adjuvant 5-FU alone in stage II patients with microsatellite instability
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Rectal cancer
Surgery
Stage I
Follow-up
Low-Risk
Stage II
Follow-up
High-Risk
Stage II/Stage III
Stage IVa
Resectable
Stage IVa
Convertible
Stage IVb
Surgery
ChemoT PalliativeCT
Follow-up Follow-up Follow-up
AdjChemoT
Surgery
AdjChemoT
Surgery Surgery
ChemoRT ChemoRT
ChemoRT
ChemoRT
Pelvic radiation (with radiosensitizing chemotherapy) decreases local-
recurrence, but has no impact in overall survival in rectal cancer
AdjChemoT
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer
Ideally, start within 1 month of surgery, for 6 months
Improves survival in stage II-III CRC patients
Based on Fluorouracil (5-FU)
Infusional 5-FU both more effective, and less toxic, than bolus
Modulation with Folinate (Leucovorin, LV) improves outcomes
Unclear benefit of Oxaliplatin in stage II and older than 70
Oxaliplatin reasonable in high-risk stage II rectal cancer (ie, FOLFOX)
No benefit of adjuvant 5-FU alone in stage II patients with microsatellite instability
CRC: Treatment
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Systemic therapy for metastatic CRC
5-FU-based (or Capecitabine)
Each, oxaliplatin and irinotecan improve overall survival
Bevacizumab increases overall survival in first- and second-line always with CT
Other antiangiogenic agents can be used in second-line (aflibercept, ramicirumab)
Anti-EGFR agents are active as single-agents and combination in unmutated RAS
Left-sided colon cancer appear to derive greater benefit from anti-EGFR therapy
Multikinase inhibitors may afford benefit after all other agents have been used
With current therapies, median overall survival for metastatic CRC is abotu 39 mo
CRC: Clinical pathway - stage III colon cancer
Screening
Symptoms
Colonoscopy / Biopsy
Staging
CT/CEA/labs
Surgery
6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, FOLFOX)
CRC: Clinical pathway - stage III colon cancer
Screening
Symptoms
Colonoscopy / Biopsy
Staging
CT/CEA/labs
Surgery
6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, FOLFOX)
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer
Surgery
4-6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX)
ChemoRT
(ie, 5FU/LV)
CRC: Clinical pathway - stage III colon cancer
Screening
Symptoms
Colonoscopy / Biopsy
Staging
CT/CEA/labs
Surgery
6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, FOLFOX)
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer
Surgery
4-6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX)
ChemoRT
(ie, 5FU/LV)
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS
Bevacizumab
FOLFIRI
Bevacizumab
FOLFOX
Regorafenib
CRC: Clinical pathway - stage III colon cancer
Screening
Symptoms
Colonoscopy / Biopsy
Staging
CT/CEA/labs
Surgery
6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, FOLFOX)
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer
Surgery
4-6 months adjuvant CT
(ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX)
ChemoRT
(ie, 5FU/LV)
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS
Bevacizumab
FOLFIRI
Bevacizumab
FOLFOX
Regorafenib
CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS
Cetuximab
FOLFIRI
Bevacizumab
FOLFOX
Regorafenib
CRC: Follow-up
Harrison’s, 19th Ed.
Post-treatment follow-up
3-5% life-time risk of a second CRC, 15% risk of polyps
5-year follow-up
H&P q12w x2-3 years. Thereafter, semi-annually until year 5
Triennial colonoscopy
CEA q12w x2-3 years. Thereafter, semi-annually until year 5
Contrast-enhanced thorax, abdomen and pelvis CT q1yr until year 3
CRC: Prognosis

CES 2016 02 - Colorectal cancer

  • 1.
    CES 2016.02: LowerGastrointestinal Cancers Mauricio Lema Medina MD
  • 2.
    Mauricio Luján Piedrahíta,MD Acknowledgments
  • 3.
    Second cause ofcancer death in the US The incidence has decreased recently (in the US) due to screening Mortality has decreased by about 25% POLYPS Grossly visible protrusion fro the mucosal surface Nonneoplastic hamartoma Hyperplastic mucosal proliferation (hyperplastic polyp) Adenomatous polyps Clearly preneoplastic Only a minority of polyps progress to cancer High prevalence: 30% and 50% in middle-aged and elderly adults Only 1% become malignant Multistep molecular evolution through cancer Colon cancer is thought to arise from sequential DNA derrangements in a polyp These may include: Point mutations in the K-ras (KRAS) oncogene Hypomethylation of DNA Allelic loss of a TSG like 5q (APC), 18q (DCC), 17p (p53) Oncogene activation Loss of tumor suppression activity
  • 4.
    Multi-stage carcinogenesis incolon cancer Inspired on: Vogelstein B, 1990
  • 5.
    MAPK pathway (activating)mutations occur in about 60% CRC KRAS: 40-50% NRAS: 10% BRAF: 8%
  • 6.
    POLYPS Pedunculated Flat-based: sessile Higherrisk of cancer development Tubular Villous Tubulovillous Higher risk of cancer development (3x) Small (1.5 cm, or less) Intermediate (1.5-2.5 cm) Substantial (2.5 cm, or more) (2-10% cancer risk) (10% cancer risk or more) The entire bowel should be visualized (1-3 risk of synchronous polyps). Follow-up with colonoscopies: 30-50% risk of another adenoma Adenomas become cancer in about 5 years Colonoscopy need not be more frequent than every 3 years Once a poly is found
  • 7.
    Risk factors forthe development of colorectal cancer Diet: animal fat Hereditary syndromes Inflammatory bowel diseaseStreptococcus bovis bacteremia Upper socioeconomic populations Correlates with per capita consumption of calories, meat protein, dietary fat and oil, high cholesterol, high coronary artery disease Dietary fats change in the microbiome (anaerobes), converting bile-acids into carcinogens High-calorie intake / inactivity cause obesity: insulin resistance, increase in IGF-1, more polyps (and cancer) Fibers and vegetable intake have no been proven to prevent CRC development Up to 25% have a family history Polyposis coli MYH-associated polyposis Nonpolyposis syndromes (Lynch) More with ulcerative colitis Rare during first 10 years Thereafter: 1%/yr incidence Prophylactic colectomy for long active IBD For unknown reason Consider upper and lower GI endoscopies
  • 8.
    Hereditary syndromes Polyposis coli Thousandsof adenomatous polyps through the large bowel Autosomal dominant Deletion of 5q Loss of the APC gene (a TSG) Gardner’s syndrome Soft-tissue and bony tumors Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal epithelium Mesenteric desmoid tumors Ampullary carcinomas Polyposis coli Turcot’s syndrome Malignant tumors of the Central Nervous system Polyposis coli Polyps are rare before puberty But are detectable in most by age 25 Cancer will develop in (almost) all by 40 Once multiple polyps develop, total colectomy must be performed Offspring of affected patients have 50% risk of disease Flexible sigmoidoscopy until 35 should be performed Germ-line APC mutation detection should be considered
  • 9.
    Hereditary syndromes Hereditary nonpolyposiscolon cancer (HNPCC) - Lynch’s syndrome Three or more relatives with documented colorectal cancer; one who is a first-degree relative of the other two; CRC before 50 in at least one; Spanning at least 2 generations. Autosomal dominant Median-age at CRC diagnosis: less than 50 Screening colonoscopy starting on age 25 (q1 to 2 years), with pelvic US/endometrial biopsy for women Poorly-differentiated Mucinous histologies Right-sided preference BETER PROGNOSIS Association with other malignancies (in the family) Ovarian or endometrial carcinomas in women Gastric, small-bowel, pancreaticobiliary, genitourinary cancers sebaceus skin tumors Lynch’s syndrome is associated with mutations of several genes hMSH2 (chromosome 2) hMLH1 (chromosome 3), and others Unable to repair DNA mismatches (MMR) High frequency of microsatellite instability
  • 10.
    Colorectal cancer: presentingsymptoms Right-sided colon tumors May be very large without symptoms Iron-deficiency anemia is characteristic Left-sided tumors Abdominal cramping Intestinal obstruction Intestinal perforation Rectosigmoid tumors Hematochezia tenesmus narrowing of the caliber of stool (similar to hemorrhoids) Anemia is rare
  • 11.
    CRC: Staging, prognosticfactors, and pattern of spread Harrison’s, 19th Ed. Predictors of poor outcome following total surgical resection in CRC Tumor spread to regional lymph nodes Number of lymph nodes involved Tumor penetration to through the bowel wall Poorly differentiated histology Perforation Tumor adherence to adjacent organs Venous invasion Preoperative CEA elevation Aneuploidy Specific chromosomal deletion (BRAF mutation, absence of MSI)
  • 12.
    CRC: Staging, prognosticfactors, and pattern of spread Harrison’s, 19th Ed. Adenocarcinoma
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    CRC: Staging, prognosticfactors, and pattern of spread Harrison’s, 19th Ed. High-risk stage II T4 Perforation Obstruction Lymphovascular invasion non-R0 resection Less than 12 lymph nodes evaluated High-risk recurrence score (in MSS)
  • 16.
    CRC: pattern ofspread Harrison’s, 19th Ed. Most recurrences occur within 4 years of surgery At least 12 lymph nodes need to be evaluated to establish prognosis TNM/Stage is prognostic Regional lymph nodes Supraclavicular lymph nodes Liver metastases Initial site of spread in 1/3 Involved at death in 2/3 Median survival of metastatic CRC is improving: about 2-3 years (2016)
  • 17.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Pre-surgical work-up H&P Basic labs, including LFTs, CEA Thorax, abdomen and pelvis contrast-enhanced CT Full-length colonoscopy Surgery Colectomy with regional lymph-node dissection Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with regional lymph-node dissection At least 12 lymph-nodes need to be assessed Surgery in symptomatic patients, regardless of metastases Adequate surgical margins needed to avoid recurrence in the anastomotic site
  • 18.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Colon cancer (non-rectal) Surgery Stage I Follow-up Low-Risk Stage II Follow-up High-Risk Stage II/Stage III Stage IVa Resectable Stage IVa Convertible Stage IVb Surgery ChemoT PalliativeCT Follow-up Follow-up Follow-up AdjChemoT Surgery AdjChemoT Surgery Surgery
  • 19.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer Ideally, start within 1 month of surgery, for 6 months Improves survival by 30% in stage III CRC patients May improve survival in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients Based on Fluorouracil (5-FU) Infusional 5-FU both more effective, and less toxic, than bolus Modulation with Folinate (Leucovorin, LV) improves outcomes Addition of Oxaliplatin improves DFS and OS in stage III patients (ie, FOLFOX) Unclear benefit of Oxaliplatin in stage II and older than 70 No benefit of adjuvant 5-FU alone in stage II patients with microsatellite instability
  • 20.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Rectal cancer Surgery Stage I Follow-up Low-Risk Stage II Follow-up High-Risk Stage II/Stage III Stage IVa Resectable Stage IVa Convertible Stage IVb Surgery ChemoT PalliativeCT Follow-up Follow-up Follow-up AdjChemoT Surgery AdjChemoT Surgery Surgery ChemoRT ChemoRT ChemoRT ChemoRT Pelvic radiation (with radiosensitizing chemotherapy) decreases local- recurrence, but has no impact in overall survival in rectal cancer AdjChemoT
  • 21.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer Ideally, start within 1 month of surgery, for 6 months Improves survival in stage II-III CRC patients Based on Fluorouracil (5-FU) Infusional 5-FU both more effective, and less toxic, than bolus Modulation with Folinate (Leucovorin, LV) improves outcomes Unclear benefit of Oxaliplatin in stage II and older than 70 Oxaliplatin reasonable in high-risk stage II rectal cancer (ie, FOLFOX) No benefit of adjuvant 5-FU alone in stage II patients with microsatellite instability
  • 22.
    CRC: Treatment Harrison’s, 19thEd. Systemic therapy for metastatic CRC 5-FU-based (or Capecitabine) Each, oxaliplatin and irinotecan improve overall survival Bevacizumab increases overall survival in first- and second-line always with CT Other antiangiogenic agents can be used in second-line (aflibercept, ramicirumab) Anti-EGFR agents are active as single-agents and combination in unmutated RAS Left-sided colon cancer appear to derive greater benefit from anti-EGFR therapy Multikinase inhibitors may afford benefit after all other agents have been used With current therapies, median overall survival for metastatic CRC is abotu 39 mo
  • 23.
    CRC: Clinical pathway- stage III colon cancer Screening Symptoms Colonoscopy / Biopsy Staging CT/CEA/labs Surgery 6 months adjuvant CT (ie, FOLFOX)
  • 24.
    CRC: Clinical pathway- stage III colon cancer Screening Symptoms Colonoscopy / Biopsy Staging CT/CEA/labs Surgery 6 months adjuvant CT (ie, FOLFOX) CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer Surgery 4-6 months adjuvant CT (ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX) ChemoRT (ie, 5FU/LV)
  • 25.
    CRC: Clinical pathway- stage III colon cancer Screening Symptoms Colonoscopy / Biopsy Staging CT/CEA/labs Surgery 6 months adjuvant CT (ie, FOLFOX) CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer Surgery 4-6 months adjuvant CT (ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX) ChemoRT (ie, 5FU/LV) CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS Bevacizumab FOLFIRI Bevacizumab FOLFOX Regorafenib
  • 26.
    CRC: Clinical pathway- stage III colon cancer Screening Symptoms Colonoscopy / Biopsy Staging CT/CEA/labs Surgery 6 months adjuvant CT (ie, FOLFOX) CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage II/III rectal cancer Surgery 4-6 months adjuvant CT (ie, 5-FULV/FOLFOX) ChemoRT (ie, 5FU/LV) CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS Bevacizumab FOLFIRI Bevacizumab FOLFOX Regorafenib CRC: Clinical pathway - Stage IVb CRC mutated RAS Cetuximab FOLFIRI Bevacizumab FOLFOX Regorafenib
  • 27.
    CRC: Follow-up Harrison’s, 19thEd. Post-treatment follow-up 3-5% life-time risk of a second CRC, 15% risk of polyps 5-year follow-up H&P q12w x2-3 years. Thereafter, semi-annually until year 5 Triennial colonoscopy CEA q12w x2-3 years. Thereafter, semi-annually until year 5 Contrast-enhanced thorax, abdomen and pelvis CT q1yr until year 3
  • 28.