Chapter 21
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• Theoretical Foundations
• Using the Method
• Potential Problems
• Conclusion
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• Clayton Christensen proposes that bigger,
better and more and more sophisticated
incremental improvement is not good.
• In contrast, institutions that embrace
disruptive change and fundamentally “change
their DNA” by becoming more nimble and
responsive will survive and thrive
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• As we incorporate the newest technologies
into our teaching, how can we know if we are
making a significant difference that improves
learning instead of simply swapping a digital
teaching tool for its analog predecessor?
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• LMSs – Learning Management Systems were
developed in the early 1990s
– Provide faculty and students with a suite of
password-protected tools especially designed for
learning contexts
– Represented a shift in using technology as a
discrete tool to technology as an online place where
learning could happen
– Provides a virtual classroom
– Can be expensive
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• There is a need for more flexibility to
accommodate a wider range of learning
preferences and scenarios, and less complexity
to shorten the learning curve and lower
barriers to entry.
• Web 2.0 brought social media to life with tools
that are visually engaging, elegantly designed
and easy to use.
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• Social media apps open up possibilities for
learning that engage all types of students in
active and collaborative work.
– Have a strong visual component
– Designed to support networking between
users (vs. teacher directed LMS)
– Shift from information to connections
Social Media as a Context for
Connected Learning
• “When many of us started in this field we were excited about the
possibilities of e-learning, and we still are, but e-learning may be a
term and a concept that’s limited by history and perception …
Initially e-learning was about the digital dissemination of
information. We were in the information age, and e-learning
allowed us to get more information faster and more conveniently.
However, we’ve moved beyond the information age; we are in the
connected age. Everyone and everything is connected. Anyone can
participate, and it isn’t just about being face-to-face or online, it’s
a continuum … What does e-learning look like when it shifts from
being about information to being about connections? The next
step in next generation learning is connected learning. (Oblinger,
2013)
Theoretical Foundations
• How can educators avail themselves of
emerging technologies without sacrificing
precious learning time with their students?
– Many want to select a tool and determine its
educational use, this is inefficient and
ineffective
– Need to develop courses and assignments
in response to and as an investigation of
students’ learning needs and developing
abilities.
Theoretical Foundations
• A problem-based approach helps faculty select
emerging technologies that disrupt or
transcend the confines of course-based
learning in a way that is both meaningful and
productive
Theoretical Foundations
• The disruptive use of emerging technology in
education is grounded in a vision for learning
that:
– Is responsive to learners’ intellectual and
social needs.
– Fosters connections between the course at
hand and students’ life experiences (e.g.,
friends, family, regional, ethnic, and cultural
affinity groups).
Theoretical Foundations
• The disruptive use of emerging technology in
education is grounded in a vision for learning
that:
– Creates a bridge between the course and
students’ larger learning contexts (e.g., other
courses, internships, service learning, and
co-ops).
Theoretical Foundations
• The disruptive use of emerging technology in
education is grounded in a vision for learning
that:
– Taps into diverse preferences and
perspectives, allowing students to play to
their strengths as they grapple with course
concepts.
– Helps students achieve deeper conceptual
understanding and develop core capabilities
in relationship to the course topic or
discipline.
Theoretical Foundations
• Expanded Approaches to Learning
– Historically, higher education has best
served students who learned best through
reading, listening to lectures, note taking,
and sequential problem solving such as
mathematical calculation.
– Logic dictates that if there is more than one
way to be smart, there should also be more
than one way to learn and be taught.
Theoretical Foundations
• Four-part model which is useful in exploring the
relevance of social media for higher education:
1. Reflective and active
• Reflective involves learning by thinking.
• Active involves learning by doing.
2. Sensing and intuitive
• Sensing involves learning by facts and verifiable
experience.
• Intuitive involves learning through innovation
and possibility thinking.
Theoretical Foundations
• Four-part model which is useful in exploring
the relevance of social media for higher
education:
3. Verbal and visual
• Verbal involves learning through the
written and spoken word.
• Visual involves learning through images,
diagrams, and timelines.
Theoretical Foundations
• Four-part model which is useful in exploring
the relevance of social media for higher
education:
4. Sequential and global
• Sequential involves drawing on details
and facts to construct larger
understanding.
• Global involves starting with the big
picture and then analyzing the whole to
understand the sum of its parts.
Using the Method
• Begin by surveying the needs of users, develop
a spec (specifications document that describes
what the product needs to be able to do)
• Questions to ask
– What should my students know and
understand by the end of the course (or
assignment or module)?
– Which skills or capabilities, academic or
disciplinary, are essential to achieving the
goals for learning?
Using the Method
• Questions to ask
– What is the problem (à la Randy Bass) that I
am trying to solve—which of the goals for
learning have been difficult for learners to
achieve when I taught this course in the
past?
– What do I want for myself and for my
students? For example, you may want to
obtain a clearer picture of students’ thought
processes, or you may want your students to
connect course concepts to everyday life.
Using the Method
• Questions to ask
– By the end of the learning sequence, which
evidence will I and my students need to be
confident that learning goals have been
achieved? Along the way, which evidence
would help me and my students identify
trouble spots to address areas of concern
and make adjustments as necessary?
Using the Method
• Questions to ask
– Which modes of learning are particularly
relevant to the topic or leaning goals? For
example, epidemiology may lend itself to
mapping, clinical decision making to visual
and other data analysis, and cultural
competence or medical ethics to multimedia
storytelling (Matthews-DeNatale, 2008).
Using the Method
• The answers to these question provide a spec that can
be used in seeking out emerging technologies that best
align with the learning scenario.
• Can also be called learning design
• Educase series “7 Things You Should Know About…”
provide info on a variety of tools and practices
• Horizon Report – an annual digest of technologies that
are likely to have a significant impact on teaching and
learning in the near future,
Potential Problems
• The tools can be confusing, intimidating and scary.
• Can also be too easy to use, causing people to post
information that they should not.
• Emerging technologies come with no guarantee of
backups, security, or even ongoing existence
• Unlike learning management systems, social media
tools come unbundled, are rarely supported at the
institutional level, and therefore place the onus for
technical orientation and support on the teacher.
Potential Problems
• When using emerging technologies the
students experience each one as a different
tool
• One strategy is to use the LMS as a portal or
door through which students can access all
other tools used in the class.
Conclusion
• Those who want to incorporate emerging
technologies into their teaching are cautioned
to focus on pedagogy first

Chapter 21

  • 1.
    Chapter 21 Social Mediaas a Context for Connected Learning
  • 2.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • Theoretical Foundations • Using the Method • Potential Problems • Conclusion
  • 3.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • Clayton Christensen proposes that bigger, better and more and more sophisticated incremental improvement is not good. • In contrast, institutions that embrace disruptive change and fundamentally “change their DNA” by becoming more nimble and responsive will survive and thrive
  • 4.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • As we incorporate the newest technologies into our teaching, how can we know if we are making a significant difference that improves learning instead of simply swapping a digital teaching tool for its analog predecessor?
  • 5.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • LMSs – Learning Management Systems were developed in the early 1990s – Provide faculty and students with a suite of password-protected tools especially designed for learning contexts – Represented a shift in using technology as a discrete tool to technology as an online place where learning could happen – Provides a virtual classroom – Can be expensive
  • 6.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • There is a need for more flexibility to accommodate a wider range of learning preferences and scenarios, and less complexity to shorten the learning curve and lower barriers to entry. • Web 2.0 brought social media to life with tools that are visually engaging, elegantly designed and easy to use.
  • 7.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • Social media apps open up possibilities for learning that engage all types of students in active and collaborative work. – Have a strong visual component – Designed to support networking between users (vs. teacher directed LMS) – Shift from information to connections
  • 8.
    Social Media asa Context for Connected Learning • “When many of us started in this field we were excited about the possibilities of e-learning, and we still are, but e-learning may be a term and a concept that’s limited by history and perception … Initially e-learning was about the digital dissemination of information. We were in the information age, and e-learning allowed us to get more information faster and more conveniently. However, we’ve moved beyond the information age; we are in the connected age. Everyone and everything is connected. Anyone can participate, and it isn’t just about being face-to-face or online, it’s a continuum … What does e-learning look like when it shifts from being about information to being about connections? The next step in next generation learning is connected learning. (Oblinger, 2013)
  • 9.
    Theoretical Foundations • Howcan educators avail themselves of emerging technologies without sacrificing precious learning time with their students? – Many want to select a tool and determine its educational use, this is inefficient and ineffective – Need to develop courses and assignments in response to and as an investigation of students’ learning needs and developing abilities.
  • 10.
    Theoretical Foundations • Aproblem-based approach helps faculty select emerging technologies that disrupt or transcend the confines of course-based learning in a way that is both meaningful and productive
  • 11.
    Theoretical Foundations • Thedisruptive use of emerging technology in education is grounded in a vision for learning that: – Is responsive to learners’ intellectual and social needs. – Fosters connections between the course at hand and students’ life experiences (e.g., friends, family, regional, ethnic, and cultural affinity groups).
  • 12.
    Theoretical Foundations • Thedisruptive use of emerging technology in education is grounded in a vision for learning that: – Creates a bridge between the course and students’ larger learning contexts (e.g., other courses, internships, service learning, and co-ops).
  • 13.
    Theoretical Foundations • Thedisruptive use of emerging technology in education is grounded in a vision for learning that: – Taps into diverse preferences and perspectives, allowing students to play to their strengths as they grapple with course concepts. – Helps students achieve deeper conceptual understanding and develop core capabilities in relationship to the course topic or discipline.
  • 14.
    Theoretical Foundations • ExpandedApproaches to Learning – Historically, higher education has best served students who learned best through reading, listening to lectures, note taking, and sequential problem solving such as mathematical calculation. – Logic dictates that if there is more than one way to be smart, there should also be more than one way to learn and be taught.
  • 15.
    Theoretical Foundations • Four-partmodel which is useful in exploring the relevance of social media for higher education: 1. Reflective and active • Reflective involves learning by thinking. • Active involves learning by doing. 2. Sensing and intuitive • Sensing involves learning by facts and verifiable experience. • Intuitive involves learning through innovation and possibility thinking.
  • 16.
    Theoretical Foundations • Four-partmodel which is useful in exploring the relevance of social media for higher education: 3. Verbal and visual • Verbal involves learning through the written and spoken word. • Visual involves learning through images, diagrams, and timelines.
  • 17.
    Theoretical Foundations • Four-partmodel which is useful in exploring the relevance of social media for higher education: 4. Sequential and global • Sequential involves drawing on details and facts to construct larger understanding. • Global involves starting with the big picture and then analyzing the whole to understand the sum of its parts.
  • 18.
    Using the Method •Begin by surveying the needs of users, develop a spec (specifications document that describes what the product needs to be able to do) • Questions to ask – What should my students know and understand by the end of the course (or assignment or module)? – Which skills or capabilities, academic or disciplinary, are essential to achieving the goals for learning?
  • 19.
    Using the Method •Questions to ask – What is the problem (à la Randy Bass) that I am trying to solve—which of the goals for learning have been difficult for learners to achieve when I taught this course in the past? – What do I want for myself and for my students? For example, you may want to obtain a clearer picture of students’ thought processes, or you may want your students to connect course concepts to everyday life.
  • 20.
    Using the Method •Questions to ask – By the end of the learning sequence, which evidence will I and my students need to be confident that learning goals have been achieved? Along the way, which evidence would help me and my students identify trouble spots to address areas of concern and make adjustments as necessary?
  • 21.
    Using the Method •Questions to ask – Which modes of learning are particularly relevant to the topic or leaning goals? For example, epidemiology may lend itself to mapping, clinical decision making to visual and other data analysis, and cultural competence or medical ethics to multimedia storytelling (Matthews-DeNatale, 2008).
  • 22.
    Using the Method •The answers to these question provide a spec that can be used in seeking out emerging technologies that best align with the learning scenario. • Can also be called learning design • Educase series “7 Things You Should Know About…” provide info on a variety of tools and practices • Horizon Report – an annual digest of technologies that are likely to have a significant impact on teaching and learning in the near future,
  • 23.
    Potential Problems • Thetools can be confusing, intimidating and scary. • Can also be too easy to use, causing people to post information that they should not. • Emerging technologies come with no guarantee of backups, security, or even ongoing existence • Unlike learning management systems, social media tools come unbundled, are rarely supported at the institutional level, and therefore place the onus for technical orientation and support on the teacher.
  • 24.
    Potential Problems • Whenusing emerging technologies the students experience each one as a different tool • One strategy is to use the LMS as a portal or door through which students can access all other tools used in the class.
  • 25.
    Conclusion • Those whowant to incorporate emerging technologies into their teaching are cautioned to focus on pedagogy first