MVNO Opportunity –
Everywhere but Romania?
• Overview
• MVNO Types
• MVNO MNO Relationship
• MNO Perspective
• Cannibalization
• Conclusions
Summary
“A MVNO is a company that provides mobile phone services but
does not have its own licensed frequency allocation of radio
spectrum, […]” - Wikipedia
“Almost one third of mobile subscribers in the Netherlands are
customers of virtual operators…” - Dutch analyst house Telecom Paper
“The MVNO business continues to exceed expectations. In 2010,
the four alliances combined nearly doubled their contribution to
the total Celcom revenue, […]” - Source: Axiata 2010 Annual report
Overview
“MVNOs' share in Bulgaria, Hungary and Poland rather small -
MVNOs unable to compete with MNOs in terms of pricing, service
offering and quality - In Poland, MVNOs struggle with churn and
high mobile termination rates - In Hungary, bundling of mobile
with fixed, cable TV and Internet helped reduce churn. “
Infocom
Overview
Current status on Eastern European countries
• 550 Active MVNOs with
over 85 million subscribers
• Global MVNO markets will
reach 186 million
subscribers by 2015
• Highest growth in Western
Europe & LATAM;
Overview
Western
Europe, 45%
Eastern Europe,
14%
Africa, 2%
Middle East, 2%
North America,
21%
Latin America,
3%
Asia Pacific,
12%
Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
Differentiation
MVNO Types
Distribution
Segmentation
Expats/
foreign workers
Religious
interests
Enterprise
verticals
M2M apps
Ethnic
VAS
Data/Content
Roaming
Brand
Lifestyle
Captive
audience
Existing
customers
for other
products
POS
MVNO’s Challenges
Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
What are the top business challenges for MVNOs?
Top business challenges
• Thin Margins (10%-40% of price)
• 80% of the success is dependent on
the MNO buy price
• MVNO agreements – complex
• Convergence and Bundling
• favor large operators
MVNO’s Challenges
Business challenges
• Contract period and exclusivity
• Prepaid, postpaid or both
• Equity participation and cost-sharing
• Minimum revenue commitment
• Infrastructure leasing / outsourced back-end support
• SIM card production
• Portal and 3rd-party content development and sales
• Guaranteed Traffic / Usage levels
• Distribution channels and commissions
• Inbound and outbound roaming
• Service level agreements
• Dispute resolution framework
• Numbering blocks
MVNO – MNO Relationship
Value for MNOs through well managed partnerships
MVNO – MNO Relationship
Radio
Access
Core
Network
Application and
Services
Billing Customer Care Marketing Sales
MNO Reseller (Thin/Light MVNO)
MNO Service Provider MVNO
MNO Enhanced Service Provider
MNO Full Infrastructure MVNO (Thick/Heavy MVNO)
MVNE
MNO
MVNO
MVNE MVNO
What’s in it for MNOs?
MVNO – MNO Relationship
• Drive revenue to offset the enormous cost of
building 3G/LTE networks
• Opportunity to partner with profitable
MVNOs with strong brands and distribution
channel to turn unprofitable customer segments
into profitable ones
• Use multiple brands to address different
segments
• New revenue streams: focus on profit from
MVNOs success rather than ARPU
• Focus on personalization (large operators
usually offer one size fits all packages)
• Gain strength – from non telco MVNOs’
customers segments, content, brand loyalty and
possibly more money to invest in building future
mobile networks and applications infrastructure
• Broaden the customer base and/or increase volume:
• Address untapped niche markets (sell additional MOU's) without costs
• Use an alternative distribution channel or a different brand
• Expand in other countries starting from an MVNO
• Overcome IT bottlenecks
MVNOs cannot enter the market by force!
MVNO – MNO Relationship
Nowhere did the regulators manage to force
operators accept MVNOs against operator’s will!
• MNOs increasingly see the marketing value that well chosen
MVNOs bring to them
• Increase in market size through better targeting / segmentation
• Incremental revenues in ‘weak segments’ for the MNO
• The economics of mobile data are incentivizing more network
sharing
• Spectrum scarcity is an issue for successful MNOs, leading to more network
sharing (inc. active)
• This may well lead to the de facto ‘virtualization’ of many MNOs
• Successful MNOs are starting to see the benefit of MVNOs for
growth
• MVNOs can increase market size with products targeted to
specific audiences
MVNO as opportunity
Cannibalization. Reality or just a myth?
MVNOs carry strategic risks and advantages for host MNOs
Address
impenetrable
market
Attack
competitors key
segments more
effectively
Cannibalization of
existing
customers
Overall margin
erosion
• Reach customers outside the Operator’s core markets without damaging own
brand
• Reach customers who would never become your customers, for whatever reason
• Attack new segments without costly development of new sub-brands
• Drive net additions, revenue and traffic without high acquisition costs
• Ineffective targeting or fencing of MVNO propositions may lead to mass churn
• Intentional abuse of loopholes by partners to attack beyond agreed segments
• Risk to stimulate competition by other MNOs, resulting in Operators rate
reductions
• Additional CAPEX and OPEX may be required to successfully support MVNOs
Rewards
Risks
Cannibalization. Reality or just a myth?
Use case: Major SE Asian Operator weaknesses
• The operator has strong
position/high segment market share
 MVNO partnership not suitable given
small potential and opportunity costs
• The operator currently has low
segment market share
 Small base but high ARPU, requiring
customized propositions, marketing
and channels
• The operator currently has high
segment market share
 Only consider if MVNO can reduce cost
to serve and increase margins, with
impositions of tight controls
• The Operator currently has low
segment market share
 Large opportunity and ideal for
MVNOs if the operator is truly
unable to effectively capture using
own brands
Cannibalization. Reality or just a myth?
Use case: Major SE Asian Operator weaknesses
• Will compete directly with the
Operator and may not be worthwhile
given limited returns
 Offer basic reseller model with very
low margins
• Partner must have strong segment
expertise and differentiated services
 Offer flexible model depending on
type of service (e.g. voice, VAS, IDD)
and inherent partner strengths
• High risk of cannibalization requires
the Operator management and back
end control
• JV model for control with low
margins to MVNO
• Attack MVNOs, requiring compelling
propositions and strong segment
focus
 Strong fencing to avoid churn from
high risk segments; JV model for
management control
• Price war?
• No regulation?
• No trusted partners?
• No real interest from entrepreneurs?
• How can someone else do this better than the big ones?
Why not Romania?
Opportunities
• MVNOs can bring a completely new perspective to the market
• MVNO cannot succeed without full support from MNOs
• MNOs cannot give support to MVNOs unless they believe in this
business model
• Regulator can ease the licensing but cannot force MVNOs setup
• Hopefully there will be some MVNOs in Romania in the next 5
years
Conclusions
MVNO OPPORTUNITY
– EVERYWHERE BUT ROMANIA?
Thank you!
marketing@computaris.com
www.computaris.com

Computaris mvno-opportunity

  • 1.
  • 2.
    • Overview • MVNOTypes • MVNO MNO Relationship • MNO Perspective • Cannibalization • Conclusions Summary
  • 3.
    “A MVNO isa company that provides mobile phone services but does not have its own licensed frequency allocation of radio spectrum, […]” - Wikipedia “Almost one third of mobile subscribers in the Netherlands are customers of virtual operators…” - Dutch analyst house Telecom Paper “The MVNO business continues to exceed expectations. In 2010, the four alliances combined nearly doubled their contribution to the total Celcom revenue, […]” - Source: Axiata 2010 Annual report Overview
  • 4.
    “MVNOs' share inBulgaria, Hungary and Poland rather small - MVNOs unable to compete with MNOs in terms of pricing, service offering and quality - In Poland, MVNOs struggle with churn and high mobile termination rates - In Hungary, bundling of mobile with fixed, cable TV and Internet helped reduce churn. “ Infocom Overview Current status on Eastern European countries
  • 5.
    • 550 ActiveMVNOs with over 85 million subscribers • Global MVNO markets will reach 186 million subscribers by 2015 • Highest growth in Western Europe & LATAM; Overview Western Europe, 45% Eastern Europe, 14% Africa, 2% Middle East, 2% North America, 21% Latin America, 3% Asia Pacific, 12% Source: Informa Telecoms & Media
  • 6.
    Differentiation MVNO Types Distribution Segmentation Expats/ foreign workers Religious interests Enterprise verticals M2Mapps Ethnic VAS Data/Content Roaming Brand Lifestyle Captive audience Existing customers for other products POS
  • 7.
    MVNO’s Challenges Source: InformaTelecoms & Media 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% What are the top business challenges for MVNOs? Top business challenges
  • 8.
    • Thin Margins(10%-40% of price) • 80% of the success is dependent on the MNO buy price • MVNO agreements – complex • Convergence and Bundling • favor large operators MVNO’s Challenges Business challenges
  • 9.
    • Contract periodand exclusivity • Prepaid, postpaid or both • Equity participation and cost-sharing • Minimum revenue commitment • Infrastructure leasing / outsourced back-end support • SIM card production • Portal and 3rd-party content development and sales • Guaranteed Traffic / Usage levels • Distribution channels and commissions • Inbound and outbound roaming • Service level agreements • Dispute resolution framework • Numbering blocks MVNO – MNO Relationship Value for MNOs through well managed partnerships
  • 10.
    MVNO – MNORelationship Radio Access Core Network Application and Services Billing Customer Care Marketing Sales MNO Reseller (Thin/Light MVNO) MNO Service Provider MVNO MNO Enhanced Service Provider MNO Full Infrastructure MVNO (Thick/Heavy MVNO) MVNE MNO MVNO MVNE MVNO
  • 11.
    What’s in itfor MNOs? MVNO – MNO Relationship • Drive revenue to offset the enormous cost of building 3G/LTE networks • Opportunity to partner with profitable MVNOs with strong brands and distribution channel to turn unprofitable customer segments into profitable ones • Use multiple brands to address different segments • New revenue streams: focus on profit from MVNOs success rather than ARPU • Focus on personalization (large operators usually offer one size fits all packages) • Gain strength – from non telco MVNOs’ customers segments, content, brand loyalty and possibly more money to invest in building future mobile networks and applications infrastructure • Broaden the customer base and/or increase volume: • Address untapped niche markets (sell additional MOU's) without costs • Use an alternative distribution channel or a different brand • Expand in other countries starting from an MVNO • Overcome IT bottlenecks
  • 12.
    MVNOs cannot enterthe market by force! MVNO – MNO Relationship Nowhere did the regulators manage to force operators accept MVNOs against operator’s will!
  • 13.
    • MNOs increasinglysee the marketing value that well chosen MVNOs bring to them • Increase in market size through better targeting / segmentation • Incremental revenues in ‘weak segments’ for the MNO • The economics of mobile data are incentivizing more network sharing • Spectrum scarcity is an issue for successful MNOs, leading to more network sharing (inc. active) • This may well lead to the de facto ‘virtualization’ of many MNOs • Successful MNOs are starting to see the benefit of MVNOs for growth • MVNOs can increase market size with products targeted to specific audiences MVNO as opportunity
  • 14.
    Cannibalization. Reality orjust a myth? MVNOs carry strategic risks and advantages for host MNOs Address impenetrable market Attack competitors key segments more effectively Cannibalization of existing customers Overall margin erosion • Reach customers outside the Operator’s core markets without damaging own brand • Reach customers who would never become your customers, for whatever reason • Attack new segments without costly development of new sub-brands • Drive net additions, revenue and traffic without high acquisition costs • Ineffective targeting or fencing of MVNO propositions may lead to mass churn • Intentional abuse of loopholes by partners to attack beyond agreed segments • Risk to stimulate competition by other MNOs, resulting in Operators rate reductions • Additional CAPEX and OPEX may be required to successfully support MVNOs Rewards Risks
  • 15.
    Cannibalization. Reality orjust a myth? Use case: Major SE Asian Operator weaknesses • The operator has strong position/high segment market share  MVNO partnership not suitable given small potential and opportunity costs • The operator currently has low segment market share  Small base but high ARPU, requiring customized propositions, marketing and channels • The operator currently has high segment market share  Only consider if MVNO can reduce cost to serve and increase margins, with impositions of tight controls • The Operator currently has low segment market share  Large opportunity and ideal for MVNOs if the operator is truly unable to effectively capture using own brands
  • 16.
    Cannibalization. Reality orjust a myth? Use case: Major SE Asian Operator weaknesses • Will compete directly with the Operator and may not be worthwhile given limited returns  Offer basic reseller model with very low margins • Partner must have strong segment expertise and differentiated services  Offer flexible model depending on type of service (e.g. voice, VAS, IDD) and inherent partner strengths • High risk of cannibalization requires the Operator management and back end control • JV model for control with low margins to MVNO • Attack MVNOs, requiring compelling propositions and strong segment focus  Strong fencing to avoid churn from high risk segments; JV model for management control
  • 17.
    • Price war? •No regulation? • No trusted partners? • No real interest from entrepreneurs? • How can someone else do this better than the big ones? Why not Romania? Opportunities
  • 18.
    • MVNOs canbring a completely new perspective to the market • MVNO cannot succeed without full support from MNOs • MNOs cannot give support to MVNOs unless they believe in this business model • Regulator can ease the licensing but cannot force MVNOs setup • Hopefully there will be some MVNOs in Romania in the next 5 years Conclusions
  • 19.
    MVNO OPPORTUNITY – EVERYWHEREBUT ROMANIA? Thank you! [email protected] www.computaris.com