This document discusses the challenges of groundwater depletion in India and the benefits of conjunctive water use. It notes that groundwater irrigation in India has increased from 30% to 60% from 1956-2005, while surface water irrigation has decreased. Conjunctive water use, which involves using surface and groundwater together, can help control waterlogging and salinization while ensuring water supply. Studies discussed found that conjunctive use of canal water and poor quality groundwater in ratios like 1:1 or 1:2 improved crop yields compared to sole use of poor quality water. Proper conjunctive use is important for managing soil salinity and depletion issues depending on groundwater quality.
Highlighting groundwater depletion as a critical issue for India's agriculture and rural development.
Discusses the expansion of irrigation resources, showing a significant increase in irrigated area from 20.85 million ha to 63.20 million ha.
Graph showing the decadal average area irrigated by surface and groundwater from 1956-2005.
Identifies various sources of contamination affecting groundwater quality, including municipal, industrial, agricultural, and individual spills.
Suggests conjunctive use of canal water with poor quality groundwater and various strategies for managing soil salinity. Explains conjunctive use of water sources to fulfill crop irrigation needs, including benefits like cost reduction and water availability.
Identifies causes of groundwater depletion, soil salinization, and deterioration of water quality.
Research findings on the effects of conjunctive use of canal and sodic water on crop growth and yield in rice-based systems.
Methodology and results of managing irrigation with varying quality water focusing on salinity and cropping outcomes.Strategies for improving water management through conjunctive use and cyclic use of groundwater to reduce salinity impacts.
Groundwater depletion willbe the main challenge for
India’s agricultural and rural development in the
coming decades.
-IWMI,2004
3.
In India,the rapid expansion in the use of surface
and ground water, primarily for irrigation, has
contributed significantly to its agricultural &
economical development
The irrigation potential created from the surface and
ground water has increased nearly 8 to 9 times in the
last 60 years
4.
The net areairrigated by different sources in the country
has increased from 20.85 million ha during 1950-51 to
about 63.20 million ha during 2008-09
The average area irrigated from surface water has
decreased from about 70% during 1956-65 to about 40% in
1996-2005, whereas corresponding underground water
irrigation has registered an increase from 30% to about
60% during the period
The extent of poor quality water range from 32 to 84 %
whereas the average extent of sodic and saline waters are
approximately 37 to 43 % respectively
5.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1956-65 1966-75 1976-851986-95 1996-05
PercentArea
Decadal average area irrigated by surface and groundwater
resource in India 1956-2005
surface water
groundwater
Management of PoorQuality Groundwater
Conjunctive use of canal water with poor quality ground water
Technology provides sustainability and high yields compared
to rain fed agriculture. Helps to control water logging and soil
salinization
Number of amendments and bye-products such as gypsum,
pyrites, distillery spent wash and press mud identified
9.
INTRODUCTION
Conjunctive userefers to simultaneous use of surface water
and groundwater to meet crop water requirements
10.
Primary Source SecondarySource Selected Examples
Canal water Groundwater
Groundwater + Rainfall
Western Indo-Gangetic Plain (Rabi)
Western Indo-Gangetic Plain (Kharif)
Groundwater Canal water
Drainage + Rainfall
Tail End of Many Systems
Deltas in Eastern And Southern India,
Bangladesh
Rainfall Canal water
Groundwater
Drainage
Sri Lanka and Southern India
Eastern Gangetic Plain (Kharif)
Bangladesh, Eastern India
Drainage Groundwater
Canal Water
Deltas in Eastern and Southern India,
Bangladesh
Deltas in Eastern and Southern India,
Bangladesh
11.
Simultaneous useof water from different sources is
mixed before application to the crop
Separate use of water from the different sources, relying
for a single source of water for each water application
12.
Use ofgroundwater helps to reduce peak demand for
irrigation, size of canals and hence construction cost
Increases and ensures water resources supply to tail
end areas
It keeps the water table deep enough to avoid danger
of water logging or other hazards arising out of
shallow water table depth
It provides security against any irregularity in supply
of water and ensures crop productivity
13.
Threat Main Causes
Groundwater
depletion
Unregulatedgrowth of shallow tube wells in areas of
fresh groundwater
Soil salinization Excessive recycling of shallow groundwater leading
to salt accumulation in upper layers of soil
Pumping of poor quality groundwater to compensate
for deficiencies in surface water supplies
Deterioration of
groundwater quality
Leaching of salt accumulation into groundwater
Depletion of shallow freshwater overlying saline
groundwater
15.
Influence of ConjunctiveUse of Canal and Sodic Water
on Performance of Crops in Rice Based Cropping
System
(Vaiyapuri et al.,2002)
Journal of Agriculture Biological Sciences, 2(6):498-502, 2006
16.
Objective:
To findout the effect of conjunctive use of canal water and
sodic water in rice based cropping systems on the growth
and yield of crops
Material and methods:
Soil with pH 7.8, EC 0.13d S/m and ESP15.8
Canal water with pH 7.5, EC 0.5 d S/m
Alkali water with pH 8.4, EC 1.9 d S/m
Four treatments with different irrigations viz., continuous use of
alkali water (AW), canal water (CW) alone, conjunctive use of
canal and alkali water in 1:1 and 1:2 ratio for rice were fitted in
the main plot
The sub plot treatment consisted of four rice based cropping
systems viz., rice - fallow, rice - green gram, rice - sunflower and
rice - cotton
Irrigation Mode Cropsfollowing rice
Rice Follow up
crops
Fallow Green
gram
Sunflower Cotton Mean
AW AW 4100 3985 3906 3707 3924
CW AW 5750 5417 5033 4705 5226
1CW:1AW AW 4601 4247 4194 3930 4243
1CW:2AW AW 4328 4211 4054 3830 4106
Mean 4695 4465 4297 4043
19.
Irrigation Mode Cropsfollowing rice
Rice Follow up
crops
Green
gram
sunflower cotton Mean
AW AW 1716(429) 513(308) 1503(451) 1244
CW AW 3860(965) 711(427) 2793(838) 2445
1CW:1AW AW 2904(726) 648(389) 1993(598) 1848
1CW:2AW AW 2628(657) 587(352) 1877(563) 1697
Mean 2777 615 2042
20.
Irrigation Mode Cropsfollowing rice
Rice Follow
up crop
Fallow Green
gram
Sunflower Cotton Mean
AW AW 9.12 9.23 9.33 9.42 9.28
CW AW 8.07 8.40 8.51 8.62 8.40
1CW:1AW AW 8.70 8.75 8.83 8.85 8.78
1CW:2AW AW 8.96 9.08 9.22 9.25 9.13
Mean 8.72 8.87 8.97 9.03
21.
Irrigation Mode Cropsfollowing rice
Rice Follow
up crop
Fallow Green
gram
Sunflower Cotton Mean
AW AW 0.36 0.39 0.45 0.84 0.51
CW AW 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.14
1CW:1AW AW 0.17 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.19
1CW:2AW AW 0.24 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.27
Mean 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.27
23.
The conjunctiveuse of canal water for rice and alkali
water for green gram recorded the highest rice grain
equivalent yield
Continuous use of alkali water for rice and follow up
crops resulted in yield decline of 18–35% of rice and
35–50% of follow up crops
An increase in soil ESP from initial 15.8 to a range of
39-42 depending on cropping system
24.
Managing Soil SalinityThrough Conjunctive Use of
Surface And Groundwater
(Qureshi et al., 2002)
Acting Regional Director and Research Officer, IWMI
25.
Objective:
To evaluate thelong-term effects of different quality irrigation
water (obtained through mixing of poor quality groundwater in
different ratios with the good quality surface water)
Source of Water :
Canal Water, Groundwater.
Water quality standard for irrigation based on electrical
conductivity:
Category ECe(dS/m)
Fresh <1.5
Marginal 1.5-2.7
saline >2.7
Conjunctive watermanagement in fresh groundwater
areas
Conjunctive water management in marginal groundwater
areas
Conjunctive water management in saline groundwater
areas
In freshgroundwater areas (EC=1.0dS/m), FGW_100% and FGW_75%
scenarios showed an increasing trend in root zone salinity, which can
effect crop transpiration in below average rainfall (about 780mm) in a
year
In marginal groundwater areas (EC=1.5dS/m), the risk of salinization
would be much more higher than fresh groundwater areas
The results of long term simulations reveal that irrigation applications
with MGW_100% and MGW_75% scenarios would take 4-5 years to
built up root zone salinity to the level where it will start affecting crop
transpiration
35.
In salinegroundwater (EC=3dS/m), for irrigation either in
isolation or in conjunction with the canal water (by any ratio)
would be a complete disaster and land would become salinized
in just 3-4 years
36.
To optimizeconjunctive use of water, the best way is to
concentrate on capacity building of irrigation system managers
to improve system management and reshape hydraulic
infrastructure of large and small-surface systems
By conjunctive use of groundwater, we can reduce about 50
percent conveyance losses in canals
In present era, the amount of surface water is inadequate to meet
crop water requirements and directly use of poor quality
groundwater is unfit for irrigation so, conjunctive use of water
is adequate for irrigation
37.
Poor qualitygroundwater can be better utilized through its
cyclic use i.e. alternate irrigation of canal and tubewell water
which causes less built of salts in soil profile
Utilize poor quality groundwater in conjunction with canal
water to enhance the crop productivity, crop intensity and
multiple use of irrigation water than single use of water