MARTIJN OUWEHAND & ROBERT SCHUWER
Connecting OER to teachers via open
pedagogy
Cape Town, 8 March 2017
Agenda
Background
Content of the toolkit
Experiences
Future work
CC0 moritz320 https://pixabay.com/p-1138187/
© http://www.panoramio.com/photo/28790899
Background: why this toolkit? (1)
•Context: Dutch SURF SIG Open Education
•Higher Education
-Primarily for Dutch HE
-Suited for other countries?
-Suited for other sectors (Primary and secondary education)?
•Broad view on adoption
-Not only developing and reusing OER and open online
courses
-But also integration in day-to-day practices
Background: why this toolkit? (2)
•Why open education?
-OER, (M)OOC, open tools,…
•Adoption by innovators and early adopters
•Adoption seem lacking by early majority of teachers
•Target group workshop: teachers
Restriction
© European Union 2016 - Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2016) Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher
Education Institutions. JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 27938 EN; doi:10.2791/293408
Point of departure
Day-to-day
educational
practice
Content of the toolkit
•Two parts
-Basics of open
-Applying open education
Content of the toolkit (2)
•Basics of open: self-paced (4 hours)
•Applying open education:
-Bring your own case
-Apply theory on own case
Content toolkit (3)
•A script
•A course manual “Basics of open”
•Slides “Workshop Implementing open education”
•Two inspirational models
•All materials are available under CC-BY
-To organize the workshop in own institution
-In several adaptable formats
•Download: http://bit.ly/surfopentoolkitEN
•More info: https://www.surfspace.nl/sig/5-open-
education/130-tools/
Applying open education
•Especially:
-Create awareness on opportunities of openness
-Inspire (by providing good practices)
•Starting point: pedagogical teaching methods
-Connecting different gradations of openness to
pedagogy
Two approaches
•Connecting the 5R on what to achieve
-Full potential of openness not always necessary
•Use some form of an open pedagogy
-Adapted definition of (Hegarty, 2015)
Hegarty, B.(2015). Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational
Resources. Educational technology, July– August 2015, 3-13.
Key figure
Integral adaptation education (open
practice)
Reuse with adapted
learning materials (revise,
remix)
Reuse ‘as is’
(reuse)
Inspiration
(retain)
Open Pedagogy Hegarty
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Ed_Tech_Hegarty_2015_article_attributes_of_open_pedagog
y.pdf
# Feature Description
1 Participatory
Technologies
Learners are connected via social media and share
their ideas, knowledge and resources
2 People, Openness, Trust Develops self-confidence through working with
others in an open environment
3 Innovation and Creativity Encourages spontaneous innovation and creativity
4 Sharing Ideas and
Resources
Shares ideas freely for knowledge development
5 Connected Community Part of a community of professionals
6 Learner-Generated Facilitates contributions to OER by learners
7 Reflective Practice Uses reflective practices such as peer feedback
8 Peer Review Contributes to peer review
Experiences (1)
•A wide variety of cases
-Within institution probably more homogeneous
•Basic knowledge of course design was weak
-E.g. to start with formulating learning goals was not
common practice
CC0 https://pixabay.com/p-889219/ Johnhein
Experiences (2)
•Basics of open is satisfactory
-Self study
-Short test at the start of part 2
•Part 2 has a lot of information
-Probably better to spread over 2 sessions?
CC0 https://pixabay.com/p-889219/ Johnhein
Future work
•Improve toolkit based on feedback of users
-http://bit.ly/opentoolkitfeedbackEN
•Research on influence of toolkit on adoption of
openness
•Use the toolkit and provide feedback!!
-Download: http://bit.ly/surfopentoolkitEN
JC Awe https://www.flickr.com/photos/qqjawe/6511141237
CC0 Devanath https://pixabay.com/nl/hand-ja-ok-ge%C3%AFsoleerde-achtergrond-1209591/
•Martijn Ouwehand
-G.M.Ouwehand@tudelft.nl
•Robert Schuwer
-r.schuwer@fontys.nl

Connecting OER to teachers via open pedagogy

  • 1.
    MARTIJN OUWEHAND &ROBERT SCHUWER Connecting OER to teachers via open pedagogy Cape Town, 8 March 2017
  • 2.
    Agenda Background Content of thetoolkit Experiences Future work CC0 moritz320 https://pixabay.com/p-1138187/
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Background: why thistoolkit? (1) •Context: Dutch SURF SIG Open Education •Higher Education -Primarily for Dutch HE -Suited for other countries? -Suited for other sectors (Primary and secondary education)? •Broad view on adoption -Not only developing and reusing OER and open online courses -But also integration in day-to-day practices
  • 5.
    Background: why thistoolkit? (2) •Why open education? -OER, (M)OOC, open tools,… •Adoption by innovators and early adopters •Adoption seem lacking by early majority of teachers •Target group workshop: teachers
  • 6.
    Restriction © European Union2016 - Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2016) Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher Education Institutions. JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 27938 EN; doi:10.2791/293408
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Content of thetoolkit •Two parts -Basics of open -Applying open education
  • 9.
    Content of thetoolkit (2) •Basics of open: self-paced (4 hours) •Applying open education: -Bring your own case -Apply theory on own case
  • 10.
    Content toolkit (3) •Ascript •A course manual “Basics of open” •Slides “Workshop Implementing open education” •Two inspirational models •All materials are available under CC-BY -To organize the workshop in own institution -In several adaptable formats •Download: http://bit.ly/surfopentoolkitEN •More info: https://www.surfspace.nl/sig/5-open- education/130-tools/
  • 11.
    Applying open education •Especially: -Createawareness on opportunities of openness -Inspire (by providing good practices) •Starting point: pedagogical teaching methods -Connecting different gradations of openness to pedagogy
  • 12.
    Two approaches •Connecting the5R on what to achieve -Full potential of openness not always necessary •Use some form of an open pedagogy -Adapted definition of (Hegarty, 2015) Hegarty, B.(2015). Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational Resources. Educational technology, July– August 2015, 3-13.
  • 13.
    Key figure Integral adaptationeducation (open practice) Reuse with adapted learning materials (revise, remix) Reuse ‘as is’ (reuse) Inspiration (retain)
  • 14.
    Open Pedagogy Hegarty https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Ed_Tech_Hegarty_2015_article_attributes_of_open_pedagog y.pdf #Feature Description 1 Participatory Technologies Learners are connected via social media and share their ideas, knowledge and resources 2 People, Openness, Trust Develops self-confidence through working with others in an open environment 3 Innovation and Creativity Encourages spontaneous innovation and creativity 4 Sharing Ideas and Resources Shares ideas freely for knowledge development 5 Connected Community Part of a community of professionals 6 Learner-Generated Facilitates contributions to OER by learners 7 Reflective Practice Uses reflective practices such as peer feedback 8 Peer Review Contributes to peer review
  • 15.
    Experiences (1) •A widevariety of cases -Within institution probably more homogeneous •Basic knowledge of course design was weak -E.g. to start with formulating learning goals was not common practice CC0 https://pixabay.com/p-889219/ Johnhein
  • 16.
    Experiences (2) •Basics ofopen is satisfactory -Self study -Short test at the start of part 2 •Part 2 has a lot of information -Probably better to spread over 2 sessions? CC0 https://pixabay.com/p-889219/ Johnhein
  • 17.
    Future work •Improve toolkitbased on feedback of users -http://bit.ly/opentoolkitfeedbackEN •Research on influence of toolkit on adoption of openness •Use the toolkit and provide feedback!! -Download: http://bit.ly/surfopentoolkitEN
  • 18.
    JC Awe https://www.flickr.com/photos/qqjawe/6511141237 CC0Devanath https://pixabay.com/nl/hand-ja-ok-ge%C3%AFsoleerde-achtergrond-1209591/ •Martijn Ouwehand [email protected] •Robert Schuwer [email protected]

Editor's Notes