reek Founded in 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports Named for the Greek goddess of victory Just Do It! Employs 33,000 people worldwide Reported earnings of $19.2b at the end of fiscal year 31-05-2009 Ranked the 31 st  Top Brand (2006) 1 st  Sports Brand on the list
So What Happened?
So What Happened? Salaries less than minimum  wage Poor working environment No overtime pay One bathroom break 2 drinks of water each 8-hour shift Child labor scandal
Child Labour Scandal June 1996
So What Happened? Child Labour in Pakistan 12 year olds were paid 60c/day to make footballs Company had factories in South Korea, Indonesia & Thailand Children worked 12 hour days in sub-standard conditions
Why should Nike be responsible for what happens on the factories that it does not own? Hold the brand name of Nike Protect reputation Pay wages to the workers
Is it ethical for Nike to spend so much on its endorsers? No. 20 million dollars/ endorsement $2.43/person wage
Is it Nike’s responsibility to monitor its subcontracted factories? Yes Environmental, social and economic risks Subcontracted– obligation to perform a specific task
What could Nike have done, if anything to prevent the damage to its corporate reputation? Improve management team– replace or train Provide better facilities Lessen budget allocation on profit-based corporate endeavors Increase priority in corporate social welfare
The Solution Code of Conduct: all suppliers must agree to it Creation of an Excessive Overtime Task Force Wages: Nike, Other Brands, NGOs to effect change Short-term results poor, hope for success in the Long-Term Nike’s CSR website: nikebiz.com
FLA Assessment
Critique “ The CSR cost for Nike is about $10 million to $12 million a year, just for the CSR staff and expenses, to go to these sustainability meetings all over the world. They have two or three Nike people at every meeting. That’s part of the CSR game. “ I figure 75 cents per pair of shoes to the worker would fix the problem. If Nike instead paid workers 75 cents more per pair of shoes, do you know what that would cost Nike compared to the CSR cost? That would cost them $210 million a year.” Jeffrey Ballinger, Anti-sweatshop activist
CSR as Crisis Management? In June 2007,  Nike apparently renounced its use of CSR  as  "a risk and reputation management tool“ It was to become a core  "business objective.“ Source: “ Nike back in responsibility rehab ” by Steve Bruin  The Oregonian , 3 rd  June
So what is CSR? A commonly used term to describe CSR in its current evolutionary state, CSR was mentioned on national television news for the first time in early 2004. Appears to promote the social at the expense of the environmental dimension so Corporate Responsibility has emerged in preference to CSR Source: Rebecca Collings
Discussion Is CSR as a crisis management tool really CSR?
Kantian approach The motive behind the programme matters CSR should be governed by duty not self-interest CSR programmes would exclude evaluation of programme’s benefit to the organisation Focus on Corporate duties & beneficiaries allowed to define scope of the relationship The Public Relations Handbook by Alison Theaker (pp. 115-116)
Friedman Approach Social responsibility of business is to be successful CSR programmes should be governed by the self-interest of the corporation Businesses aren’t governments (risk to democracy) http://www.suite101.com/content/opposition-to-corporate-social-responsibility-a146829
Short Run and Long Run VS
Sources Seeger, M. W.; Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). "Communication, organization and crisis".  Communication Yearbook   21 : 231–275. Macroeconomics by N. Gregory Mankiw The Public Relations Handbook by Alison Theaker (pp. 115-116 http://www.suite101.com/content/opposition-to-corporate-social-responsibility-a146829 “ Nike back in responsibility rehab ” by Steve Bruin  The Oregonian , 3 rd  June http://www.gdc.net/designers/features/articles124.php http://www.slideshare.net/MsNikki/csr-case-study http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Nike#.22Social_Responsibility.22_as_Cheap_PR   Nikebiz: Company Overview: History: 1960s, Nike, Inc., Retrieved on August 12, 2010
Any Questions
Any Questions
Any Questions
Any Questions
Thank You!

Csr Report on Case 17

  • 1.
  • 2.
    reek Founded in1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports Named for the Greek goddess of victory Just Do It! Employs 33,000 people worldwide Reported earnings of $19.2b at the end of fiscal year 31-05-2009 Ranked the 31 st Top Brand (2006) 1 st Sports Brand on the list
  • 3.
  • 4.
    So What Happened?Salaries less than minimum wage Poor working environment No overtime pay One bathroom break 2 drinks of water each 8-hour shift Child labor scandal
  • 5.
  • 6.
    So What Happened?Child Labour in Pakistan 12 year olds were paid 60c/day to make footballs Company had factories in South Korea, Indonesia & Thailand Children worked 12 hour days in sub-standard conditions
  • 7.
    Why should Nikebe responsible for what happens on the factories that it does not own? Hold the brand name of Nike Protect reputation Pay wages to the workers
  • 8.
    Is it ethicalfor Nike to spend so much on its endorsers? No. 20 million dollars/ endorsement $2.43/person wage
  • 9.
    Is it Nike’sresponsibility to monitor its subcontracted factories? Yes Environmental, social and economic risks Subcontracted– obligation to perform a specific task
  • 10.
    What could Nikehave done, if anything to prevent the damage to its corporate reputation? Improve management team– replace or train Provide better facilities Lessen budget allocation on profit-based corporate endeavors Increase priority in corporate social welfare
  • 11.
    The Solution Codeof Conduct: all suppliers must agree to it Creation of an Excessive Overtime Task Force Wages: Nike, Other Brands, NGOs to effect change Short-term results poor, hope for success in the Long-Term Nike’s CSR website: nikebiz.com
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Critique “ TheCSR cost for Nike is about $10 million to $12 million a year, just for the CSR staff and expenses, to go to these sustainability meetings all over the world. They have two or three Nike people at every meeting. That’s part of the CSR game. “ I figure 75 cents per pair of shoes to the worker would fix the problem. If Nike instead paid workers 75 cents more per pair of shoes, do you know what that would cost Nike compared to the CSR cost? That would cost them $210 million a year.” Jeffrey Ballinger, Anti-sweatshop activist
  • 14.
    CSR as CrisisManagement? In June 2007, Nike apparently renounced its use of CSR as "a risk and reputation management tool“ It was to become a core "business objective.“ Source: “ Nike back in responsibility rehab ” by Steve Bruin The Oregonian , 3 rd June
  • 15.
    So what isCSR? A commonly used term to describe CSR in its current evolutionary state, CSR was mentioned on national television news for the first time in early 2004. Appears to promote the social at the expense of the environmental dimension so Corporate Responsibility has emerged in preference to CSR Source: Rebecca Collings
  • 16.
    Discussion Is CSRas a crisis management tool really CSR?
  • 17.
    Kantian approach Themotive behind the programme matters CSR should be governed by duty not self-interest CSR programmes would exclude evaluation of programme’s benefit to the organisation Focus on Corporate duties & beneficiaries allowed to define scope of the relationship The Public Relations Handbook by Alison Theaker (pp. 115-116)
  • 18.
    Friedman Approach Socialresponsibility of business is to be successful CSR programmes should be governed by the self-interest of the corporation Businesses aren’t governments (risk to democracy) http://www.suite101.com/content/opposition-to-corporate-social-responsibility-a146829
  • 19.
    Short Run andLong Run VS
  • 20.
    Sources Seeger, M.W.; Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). "Communication, organization and crisis".  Communication Yearbook   21 : 231–275. Macroeconomics by N. Gregory Mankiw The Public Relations Handbook by Alison Theaker (pp. 115-116 http://www.suite101.com/content/opposition-to-corporate-social-responsibility-a146829 “ Nike back in responsibility rehab ” by Steve Bruin The Oregonian , 3 rd June http://www.gdc.net/designers/features/articles124.php http://www.slideshare.net/MsNikki/csr-case-study http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Nike#.22Social_Responsibility.22_as_Cheap_PR   Nikebiz: Company Overview: History: 1960s, Nike, Inc., Retrieved on August 12, 2010
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.

Editor's Notes

  • #2 John
  • #3 Ann Rayray
  • #4 Melaine
  • #5 Melaine
  • #6 Melaine
  • #7 Melaine
  • #8 Maica
  • #9 Maica
  • #10 Gab
  • #11 Gab
  • #12 Adri For a complete look at Nike’s CSR policy: www.nikebiz.com
  • #13 Adri
  • #14 Caccam Nike accused of using CSR to hide from its problems, rather than solving them. In fact Ballinger is suggesting the company is continuing with its practices and is instead concentrating on obscuring the truth behind its operations. http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/ballinger052407.htm
  • #15 Caccam
  • #16 John Is CSR as a crisis management tool really CSR? Nike uses the term CR.
  • #17 John Companies argue while their activities may seem exploitative their actions are quite beneficial to the communities in which they operate. http://www.mallenbaker.net/csr/page.php?Story_ID=1708
  • #18 John
  • #19 John
  • #20 Caccam