Curriculum Development and 
Instruction 
Chapter 1
Meaning of Curriculum 
In formal education, a curriculum (/kəˈrɪkjʉləm/; 
plural: curricula( /kəˈrɪkjʉlə/ or curriculums) 
It is the planned interaction of pupils with 
instructional content,(paraprofessional's ability) 
materials, 
resources, and 
processes for evaluating the attainment of 
educational objectives.
definitions combine various 
elements to describe curriculum 
• All the learning which is planned and guided by the school, whether it is carried 
on in groups or individually, inside or outside the school. (John Kerr) 
• Outlines the skills, performances, attitudes, and values pupils are expected to 
learn from schooling. It includes statements of desired pupil outcomes, 
descriptions of materials, and the planned sequence that will be used to help 
pupils attain the outcomes. 
• The total learning experience provided by a school. It includes the content of 
courses (the syllabus), the methods employed (strategies), and other aspects, 
like norms and values, which relate to the way the school is organized. 
• The aggregate of courses of study given in a learning environment. The courses 
are arranged in a sequence to make learning a subject easier. In schools, a 
curriculum spans several grades. 
• The aggregate of courses of study given in a learning environment. The courses 
are arranged in a sequence to make learning a subject easier. In schools, a 
curriculum spans several grades. 
• Curriculum can refer to the entire program provided by a classroom, school, 
district, state, or country. A classroom is assigned sections of the curriculum as 
defined by the school.
Etymology 
As an idea, curriculum came from the Latin word which 
means a race or the course of a race (which in turn derives 
from the verb "currere" meaning to run/to proceed). 
1. As early as the seventeenth century, the University of 
Glasgow referred to its "course of study” as a curriculum. 
2. The nineteenth century European universities routinely 
referred to their curriculum to describe both the complete 
course of study (as for a degree in Surgery) and particular 
courses and their content. 
3. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the related 
term curriculum vitae "course of one's life" became a 
common expression to refer to a brief account of the 
course of one's life.
- cont - 
A curriculum is prescriptive, and is based on 
a more general syllabus which merely 
specifies what topics must be understood and 
to what level to achieve a particular grade or 
standard. Curriculum has numerous 
definitions, which can be slightly confusing. In 
its broadest sense a curriculum may refer to 
all courses offered at a school. This is 
particularly true of schools at the university 
level, where the diversity of a curriculum 
might be an attractive point to a potential 
student.
cont 
A curriculum may also refer to a 
defined and prescribed course of studies, 
which students must fulfill in order to pass a certain 
level of education. 
For example, an elementary school might discuss how 
its curriculum, or 
its entire sum of lessons and teachings, 
is designed to improve national testing scores or help 
students learn the basics. 
An individual teacher might also refer to his or her 
curriculum, meaning all the subjects that will be taught 
during a school year.
cont 
On the other hand, a high school might refer 
to a curriculum as 
the courses required in order to receive one’s 
diploma. 
They might also refer to curriculum in exactly 
the same way as the elementary school, and 
use curriculum to mean both individual 
courses needed to pass, and the overall 
offering of courses, which help prepare a 
student for life after high school.
Beliefs 
The fundamental beliefs and principles underlying a 
curriculum are very important. 
Traditionally, high school prepared students for 
college. Those students who did not intend to go to 
college often dropped out of high school. 
During the middle of the 20th century, it was believed 
that high school was valuable for all students so the 
high schools began tracking students. Some took 
more rigorous classes to prepare for college while 
others took a general track. 
Later high schools added courses to prepare for 
vocations that did not require college. Now high school 
is desired for all students.
cont 
Should curriculum be designed as pieces or as a 
whole? 
One concern in the 1990s and after is the fragmented 
curriculum. This has resulted from adding courses and 
content without aligning them to what is already being 
taught. 
The curriculum today has many pieces, but seems not 
to have a wholeness about it. 
For example, even in the primary grades, there may 
be classes in phonetics, reading, language arts, and 
writing. 
This is very fragmented as reading and writing are part 
of the whole system of communicating with symbols.
cont 
What is a good balance between academic 
achievement and developmentally appropriate 
curriculum is an ongoing question. 
Academic achievement sets levels of standards to 
meet in certain grade levels which is advocated by 
those who believe all students should attain the 
same skills; however, those who are aware of 
developmental stages and the problems of late 
development believe that levels of standards 
should be more flexible and compared over 
multiage levels.
cont 
Should it be a spiral or mastery curriculum is a major 
design question. 
The American curriculum has been a spiral curriculum 
in which many ideas are introduced at each grade and 
then repeated at following grades to add depth of 
understanding. 
The Outcome Based curriculum advocated by Spady 
used a different approach, that of mastery. 
For this, the students study a topic in depth until it is 
mastered. The question of “what is mastery?” has 
been discussed by many curriculum committees as 
they implement this type of curriculum.
Traditional Points of View of 
Curriculum 
In the early years of the 20th century, 
the traditional concepts held of the 
"curriculum is that it is a body of subjects 
or subject matter prepared by the teachers 
for the students to learn." 
It was synonymous to the "course of 
study" and "syllabus".
cont 
Robert M. Hutchins views curriculum as "permanent 
studies" where the rules of grammar, rhetoric and logic 
and mathematics for basic education are emphasized. 
Basic education should emphasize 3 Rs and college 
education should be grounded on liberal education. 
On the other hand, Arthur Bestor as an essentialist, 
believes that the mission of the school should be 
intellectual training, hence curriculum should focus on 
the fundamental intellectual disciplines of grammar, 
literature and writing. It should also include 
mathematics, science, history and foreign language.
cont 
This definition leads us to the view of Joseph 
Schwab that discipline is the sole source of 
curriculum. 
Thus in our education system, curriculum is 
divided into chunks of knowledge we call subject 
areas in basic education such as English, 
Mathematics, Science, Social Studies and others. 
In college, discipline may include humanities, 
sciences, languages and many more. 
To Phenix, curriculum should consist entirely of 
knowledge which comes from various disciplines.
cont 
Thus curriculum can be viewed as a field of 
study. 
It is made up of its foundations (philosophical, 
historical, psychological, and social 
foundations); domains of knowledge as well 
as its research theories and principles. 
Curriculum is taken as scholarly and 
theoretical. It is concerned with broad 
historical, philosophical and social issues and 
academics.
Progressive Points of View of 
Curriculum 
On the other hand, to a progressivist, a listing of school 
subjects, syllabi, course of study, and list of courses of 
specific discipline do not make a curriculum. 
These can only be called curriculum if the written materials 
are actualized by the learner. 
Broadly speaking, curriculum is defined as 
total learning experiences of the individual. 
This definition is anchored on John Dewey's definition of 
experience and education. He believed that reflective 
thinking is a means that unifies curricular elements. 
Thought is not derived from action but tested by 
application.
cont 
Caswell and Campbell viewed curriculum as 
"all experiences children have under the 
guidance of teachers." 
This definition is shared by Smith, Stanley and 
shores when they defined 
"curriculum as a sequence of potential 
experiences set up in schools for the purpose 
of disciplining children and youth in group 
ways of thinking and acting."
cont 
Marsh and Willis on the other hand view 
curriculum as all the 
"experiences in the classroom which are 
planned and enacted by teacher, and also 
learned by the students”
Historical conception 
In The Curriculum, the first textbook published on the 
subject, in 1918, John Franklin Bobbitt said that 
curriculum, as an idea, has its roots in the Latin word 
for race-course, explaining the curriculum as the 
course of deeds and experiences through which 
children become the adults they should be, for 
success in adult society. 
Furthermore, the curriculum encompasses the entire 
scope of formative deed and experience occurring in 
and out of school, and not only experiences occurring 
in school; experiences that are unplanned and 
undirected, and experiences intentionally directed for 
the purposeful formation of adult members of society.
To Bobbitt, the curriculum is a social 
engineering arena. Per his cultural presumptions 
and social definitions, his curricular formulation 
has two notable features: 
(i) that scientific experts would best be qualified to 
and justified in designing curricula based upon 
their expert knowledge of what qualities are 
desirable in adult members of society, and which 
experiences would generate said qualities; and 
(ii) curriculum defined as the deeds-experiences 
the student ought to have to become the adult he 
or she ought to become.
Hence, he defined the curriculum as an 
ideal, rather than as the concrete reality of 
the deeds and experiences that form 
people to who and what they are
Contemporary views of curriculum reject 
these features of Bobbitt's postulates, but 
retain the basis of curriculum as the course of 
experience(s) that forms human beings into 
persons. Personal formation via curricula is 
studied at the personal level and at the group 
level, i.e. cultures and societies 
(e.g. professional formation, academic 
discipline via historical experience). 
The formation of a group is reciprocal, with 
the formation of its individual participants.
Although it formally appeared in 
Bobbitt's definition, curriculum as a course of 
formative experience also pervades John 
Dewey's work (who disagreed with Bobbitt on 
important matters). 
Although Bobbitt's and Dewey's idealistic 
understanding of "curriculum" is different from 
current, restricted uses of the word, 
curriculum writers and researchers generally 
share it as common, substantive 
understanding of curriculum.
Primary and Secondary Education 
In the U.S., each state, with the individual school districts, 
establishes the curricula taught. 
Each state, however, builds its curriculum with great 
participation of national academic subject groups selected by 
the United States Department of Education, 
e.g. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) 
nctm.org for mathematical instruction. 
In Australia each state's Education Department establishes 
curricula with plans for a National Curriculum in 2011. 
UNESCO's International Bureau of Education has the primary 
mission of studying curricula and their implementation 
worldwide.
Curriculum means two things: 
(i) the range of courses from which 
students choose what subject matters to 
study, and 
(ii) a specific learning program. 
In the latter case, the curriculum 
collectively describes the teaching, 
learning, and assessment materials 
available for a given course of study.
Currently, a spiral curriculum is promoted 
as allowing students to revisit a subject 
matter's content at the different levels of 
development of the subject matter being 
studied. The constructivist approach 
proposes that children learn best via pro-active 
engagement with the educational 
environment, 
i.e. learning throw discovery.
Crucial to the curriculum is the definition of the 
course objectives that usually are expressed 
as learning outcomes' and normally include the 
program's assessment strategy. These 
outcomes and assessments are grouped 
as units (or modules), and, therefore, the 
curriculum comprises a collection of such units, 
each, in turn, comprising a specialized, specific 
part of the curriculum. So, a typical curriculum 
includes communications, numeracy, information 
technology, and social skills units, with specific, 
specialized teaching of each.
A core curriculum is a curriculum, or course of 
study, which is deemed central and usually made 
mandatory for all students of a school or school 
system. However, this is not always the case. For 
example, a school might mandate a music 
appreciation class, but students may opt out if they 
take a performing musical class, such as 
orchestra, band, chorus, etc. Core curricula are 
often instituted, at 
the primary and secondary levels, by school 
boards, Departments of Education, or other 
administrative agencies charged with overseeing 
education.
In the United States, the Common Core 
State Standards Initiative promulgates a 
core curriculum for states to adopt and 
optionally expand upon. This coordination 
is intended to make it possible to use more 
of the same textbooks across states, and 
to move toward a more uniform minimum 
level of educational attainment.
• Many educational institutions are currently trying 
to balance two opposing forces. On the one hand, 
some believe students should have a common 
knowledge foundation, often in the form of a core 
curriculum; on the other hand, others want 
students to be able to pursue their own 
educational interests, often through early specialty 
in a major, however, other times through the free 
choice of courses. This tension has received a 
large amount of coverage due to Harvard 
University's reorganization of its core 
requirements.
An essential feature of curriculum design, seen in every 
college catalog and at every other level of schooling, is the 
identification of prerequisites for each course. These 
prerequisites can be satisfied by taking particular courses, 
and in some cases by examination, or by other means, such 
as work experience. In general, more advanced courses in 
any subject require some foundation in basic courses, but 
some coursework requires study in other departments, as in 
the sequence of math classes required for a physics major, or 
the language requirements for students preparing in literature, 
music, or scientific research. A more detailed curriculum 
design must deal with prerequisites within a course for each 
topic taken up. This in turn leads to the problems of course 
organization and scheduling once the dependencies between 
topics are known.
Core curriculum in USA 
At the undergraduate level, 
individual college and university administrations 
and faculties sometimes mandate core curricula, 
especially in the liberal arts. But because of 
increasing specialization and depth in the 
student's major field of study, a typical core 
curriculum in higher education mandates a far 
smaller proportion of a student's course work than 
a high school or elementary school core 
curriculum prescribes.
Amongst the best known and most expansive 
core curricula programs at leading American 
colleges are that of Columbia 
College at Columbia University, as well as 
the University of Chicago's. Both can take up 
to two years to complete without advanced 
standing, and are designed to foster critical 
skills in a broad range of academic 
disciplines, including: the social sciences, 
humanities, physical and biological sciences, 
mathematics, writing and foreign languages.
• In 1999, the University of Chicago announced plans to reduce and 
modify the content of its core curriculum, including lowering the number 
of required courses from 21 to 15 and offering a wider range of content. 
When The New York Times, The Economist, and other major news 
outlets picked up this story, the University became the focal point of a 
national debate on education. The National Association of Scholars 
released a statement saying, "It is truly depressing to observe a steady 
abandonment of the University of Chicago's once imposing 
undergraduate core curriculum, which for so long stood as the 
benchmark of content and rigor among American academic institutions. 
Simultaneously, however, a set of university administrators, notably 
then-President Hug Sonnenschein, argued that reducing the core 
curriculum had become both a financial and educational imperative, as 
the university was struggling to attract a commensurate volume of 
applicants to its undergraduate division compared to peer schools as a 
result of what was perceived by the pro-change camp as a reaction by 
“the average eighteen-year-old” to the expanse of the collegiate core.
Further, as core curricula began to be 
diminished over the course of the twentieth 
century at many American schools, several 
smaller institutions became famous for 
embracing a core curriculum that covers 
nearly the student’s entire undergraduate 
education, often utilizing classic texts of 
the western canon to teach all subjects 
including science. St. John’s College in the 
United States is one example of this 
approach.
Distribution requirements 
Some colleges opt for the middle ground 
of the continuum between specified and 
unspecified curricula by using a system of 
distribution requirements. In such a 
system, students are required to take 
courses in particular fields of learning, but 
are free to choose specific courses within 
those fields.
• Other institutions have largely done away with core 
requirements in their entirety. Brown University offers 
the "New Curriculum," implemented after a student-led 
reform movement in 1969, which allows students to 
take courses without concern for any requirements 
except those in their chosen concentrations (majors), 
plus two writing courses. In this vein it is certainly 
possible for students to graduate without taking 
college-level science of mathematics or math courses, 
or to take only science or math courses. Amherst 
College requires that students take one of a list of first-year 
seminars, but has no required classes or 
distribution requirements. Others include Evergreen 
State College, Hamilton College, and Smith College.
Wesleyan University is another school that 
has not and does not require any set 
distribution of courses. However, 
Wesleyan does make clear "General 
Education Expectations" such that if a 
student does not meet these expectations, 
he/she would not be eligible for academic 
honors upon graduation.

Curriculum Development

  • 1.
    Curriculum Development and Instruction Chapter 1
  • 2.
    Meaning of Curriculum In formal education, a curriculum (/kəˈrɪkjʉləm/; plural: curricula( /kəˈrɪkjʉlə/ or curriculums) It is the planned interaction of pupils with instructional content,(paraprofessional's ability) materials, resources, and processes for evaluating the attainment of educational objectives.
  • 3.
    definitions combine various elements to describe curriculum • All the learning which is planned and guided by the school, whether it is carried on in groups or individually, inside or outside the school. (John Kerr) • Outlines the skills, performances, attitudes, and values pupils are expected to learn from schooling. It includes statements of desired pupil outcomes, descriptions of materials, and the planned sequence that will be used to help pupils attain the outcomes. • The total learning experience provided by a school. It includes the content of courses (the syllabus), the methods employed (strategies), and other aspects, like norms and values, which relate to the way the school is organized. • The aggregate of courses of study given in a learning environment. The courses are arranged in a sequence to make learning a subject easier. In schools, a curriculum spans several grades. • The aggregate of courses of study given in a learning environment. The courses are arranged in a sequence to make learning a subject easier. In schools, a curriculum spans several grades. • Curriculum can refer to the entire program provided by a classroom, school, district, state, or country. A classroom is assigned sections of the curriculum as defined by the school.
  • 4.
    Etymology As anidea, curriculum came from the Latin word which means a race or the course of a race (which in turn derives from the verb "currere" meaning to run/to proceed). 1. As early as the seventeenth century, the University of Glasgow referred to its "course of study” as a curriculum. 2. The nineteenth century European universities routinely referred to their curriculum to describe both the complete course of study (as for a degree in Surgery) and particular courses and their content. 3. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the related term curriculum vitae "course of one's life" became a common expression to refer to a brief account of the course of one's life.
  • 5.
    - cont - A curriculum is prescriptive, and is based on a more general syllabus which merely specifies what topics must be understood and to what level to achieve a particular grade or standard. Curriculum has numerous definitions, which can be slightly confusing. In its broadest sense a curriculum may refer to all courses offered at a school. This is particularly true of schools at the university level, where the diversity of a curriculum might be an attractive point to a potential student.
  • 6.
    cont A curriculummay also refer to a defined and prescribed course of studies, which students must fulfill in order to pass a certain level of education. For example, an elementary school might discuss how its curriculum, or its entire sum of lessons and teachings, is designed to improve national testing scores or help students learn the basics. An individual teacher might also refer to his or her curriculum, meaning all the subjects that will be taught during a school year.
  • 7.
    cont On theother hand, a high school might refer to a curriculum as the courses required in order to receive one’s diploma. They might also refer to curriculum in exactly the same way as the elementary school, and use curriculum to mean both individual courses needed to pass, and the overall offering of courses, which help prepare a student for life after high school.
  • 8.
    Beliefs The fundamentalbeliefs and principles underlying a curriculum are very important. Traditionally, high school prepared students for college. Those students who did not intend to go to college often dropped out of high school. During the middle of the 20th century, it was believed that high school was valuable for all students so the high schools began tracking students. Some took more rigorous classes to prepare for college while others took a general track. Later high schools added courses to prepare for vocations that did not require college. Now high school is desired for all students.
  • 9.
    cont Should curriculumbe designed as pieces or as a whole? One concern in the 1990s and after is the fragmented curriculum. This has resulted from adding courses and content without aligning them to what is already being taught. The curriculum today has many pieces, but seems not to have a wholeness about it. For example, even in the primary grades, there may be classes in phonetics, reading, language arts, and writing. This is very fragmented as reading and writing are part of the whole system of communicating with symbols.
  • 10.
    cont What isa good balance between academic achievement and developmentally appropriate curriculum is an ongoing question. Academic achievement sets levels of standards to meet in certain grade levels which is advocated by those who believe all students should attain the same skills; however, those who are aware of developmental stages and the problems of late development believe that levels of standards should be more flexible and compared over multiage levels.
  • 11.
    cont Should itbe a spiral or mastery curriculum is a major design question. The American curriculum has been a spiral curriculum in which many ideas are introduced at each grade and then repeated at following grades to add depth of understanding. The Outcome Based curriculum advocated by Spady used a different approach, that of mastery. For this, the students study a topic in depth until it is mastered. The question of “what is mastery?” has been discussed by many curriculum committees as they implement this type of curriculum.
  • 12.
    Traditional Points ofView of Curriculum In the early years of the 20th century, the traditional concepts held of the "curriculum is that it is a body of subjects or subject matter prepared by the teachers for the students to learn." It was synonymous to the "course of study" and "syllabus".
  • 13.
    cont Robert M.Hutchins views curriculum as "permanent studies" where the rules of grammar, rhetoric and logic and mathematics for basic education are emphasized. Basic education should emphasize 3 Rs and college education should be grounded on liberal education. On the other hand, Arthur Bestor as an essentialist, believes that the mission of the school should be intellectual training, hence curriculum should focus on the fundamental intellectual disciplines of grammar, literature and writing. It should also include mathematics, science, history and foreign language.
  • 14.
    cont This definitionleads us to the view of Joseph Schwab that discipline is the sole source of curriculum. Thus in our education system, curriculum is divided into chunks of knowledge we call subject areas in basic education such as English, Mathematics, Science, Social Studies and others. In college, discipline may include humanities, sciences, languages and many more. To Phenix, curriculum should consist entirely of knowledge which comes from various disciplines.
  • 15.
    cont Thus curriculumcan be viewed as a field of study. It is made up of its foundations (philosophical, historical, psychological, and social foundations); domains of knowledge as well as its research theories and principles. Curriculum is taken as scholarly and theoretical. It is concerned with broad historical, philosophical and social issues and academics.
  • 16.
    Progressive Points ofView of Curriculum On the other hand, to a progressivist, a listing of school subjects, syllabi, course of study, and list of courses of specific discipline do not make a curriculum. These can only be called curriculum if the written materials are actualized by the learner. Broadly speaking, curriculum is defined as total learning experiences of the individual. This definition is anchored on John Dewey's definition of experience and education. He believed that reflective thinking is a means that unifies curricular elements. Thought is not derived from action but tested by application.
  • 17.
    cont Caswell andCampbell viewed curriculum as "all experiences children have under the guidance of teachers." This definition is shared by Smith, Stanley and shores when they defined "curriculum as a sequence of potential experiences set up in schools for the purpose of disciplining children and youth in group ways of thinking and acting."
  • 18.
    cont Marsh andWillis on the other hand view curriculum as all the "experiences in the classroom which are planned and enacted by teacher, and also learned by the students”
  • 19.
    Historical conception InThe Curriculum, the first textbook published on the subject, in 1918, John Franklin Bobbitt said that curriculum, as an idea, has its roots in the Latin word for race-course, explaining the curriculum as the course of deeds and experiences through which children become the adults they should be, for success in adult society. Furthermore, the curriculum encompasses the entire scope of formative deed and experience occurring in and out of school, and not only experiences occurring in school; experiences that are unplanned and undirected, and experiences intentionally directed for the purposeful formation of adult members of society.
  • 20.
    To Bobbitt, thecurriculum is a social engineering arena. Per his cultural presumptions and social definitions, his curricular formulation has two notable features: (i) that scientific experts would best be qualified to and justified in designing curricula based upon their expert knowledge of what qualities are desirable in adult members of society, and which experiences would generate said qualities; and (ii) curriculum defined as the deeds-experiences the student ought to have to become the adult he or she ought to become.
  • 21.
    Hence, he definedthe curriculum as an ideal, rather than as the concrete reality of the deeds and experiences that form people to who and what they are
  • 22.
    Contemporary views ofcurriculum reject these features of Bobbitt's postulates, but retain the basis of curriculum as the course of experience(s) that forms human beings into persons. Personal formation via curricula is studied at the personal level and at the group level, i.e. cultures and societies (e.g. professional formation, academic discipline via historical experience). The formation of a group is reciprocal, with the formation of its individual participants.
  • 23.
    Although it formallyappeared in Bobbitt's definition, curriculum as a course of formative experience also pervades John Dewey's work (who disagreed with Bobbitt on important matters). Although Bobbitt's and Dewey's idealistic understanding of "curriculum" is different from current, restricted uses of the word, curriculum writers and researchers generally share it as common, substantive understanding of curriculum.
  • 24.
    Primary and SecondaryEducation In the U.S., each state, with the individual school districts, establishes the curricula taught. Each state, however, builds its curriculum with great participation of national academic subject groups selected by the United States Department of Education, e.g. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) nctm.org for mathematical instruction. In Australia each state's Education Department establishes curricula with plans for a National Curriculum in 2011. UNESCO's International Bureau of Education has the primary mission of studying curricula and their implementation worldwide.
  • 25.
    Curriculum means twothings: (i) the range of courses from which students choose what subject matters to study, and (ii) a specific learning program. In the latter case, the curriculum collectively describes the teaching, learning, and assessment materials available for a given course of study.
  • 26.
    Currently, a spiralcurriculum is promoted as allowing students to revisit a subject matter's content at the different levels of development of the subject matter being studied. The constructivist approach proposes that children learn best via pro-active engagement with the educational environment, i.e. learning throw discovery.
  • 27.
    Crucial to thecurriculum is the definition of the course objectives that usually are expressed as learning outcomes' and normally include the program's assessment strategy. These outcomes and assessments are grouped as units (or modules), and, therefore, the curriculum comprises a collection of such units, each, in turn, comprising a specialized, specific part of the curriculum. So, a typical curriculum includes communications, numeracy, information technology, and social skills units, with specific, specialized teaching of each.
  • 28.
    A core curriculumis a curriculum, or course of study, which is deemed central and usually made mandatory for all students of a school or school system. However, this is not always the case. For example, a school might mandate a music appreciation class, but students may opt out if they take a performing musical class, such as orchestra, band, chorus, etc. Core curricula are often instituted, at the primary and secondary levels, by school boards, Departments of Education, or other administrative agencies charged with overseeing education.
  • 29.
    In the UnitedStates, the Common Core State Standards Initiative promulgates a core curriculum for states to adopt and optionally expand upon. This coordination is intended to make it possible to use more of the same textbooks across states, and to move toward a more uniform minimum level of educational attainment.
  • 30.
    • Many educationalinstitutions are currently trying to balance two opposing forces. On the one hand, some believe students should have a common knowledge foundation, often in the form of a core curriculum; on the other hand, others want students to be able to pursue their own educational interests, often through early specialty in a major, however, other times through the free choice of courses. This tension has received a large amount of coverage due to Harvard University's reorganization of its core requirements.
  • 31.
    An essential featureof curriculum design, seen in every college catalog and at every other level of schooling, is the identification of prerequisites for each course. These prerequisites can be satisfied by taking particular courses, and in some cases by examination, or by other means, such as work experience. In general, more advanced courses in any subject require some foundation in basic courses, but some coursework requires study in other departments, as in the sequence of math classes required for a physics major, or the language requirements for students preparing in literature, music, or scientific research. A more detailed curriculum design must deal with prerequisites within a course for each topic taken up. This in turn leads to the problems of course organization and scheduling once the dependencies between topics are known.
  • 32.
    Core curriculum inUSA At the undergraduate level, individual college and university administrations and faculties sometimes mandate core curricula, especially in the liberal arts. But because of increasing specialization and depth in the student's major field of study, a typical core curriculum in higher education mandates a far smaller proportion of a student's course work than a high school or elementary school core curriculum prescribes.
  • 33.
    Amongst the bestknown and most expansive core curricula programs at leading American colleges are that of Columbia College at Columbia University, as well as the University of Chicago's. Both can take up to two years to complete without advanced standing, and are designed to foster critical skills in a broad range of academic disciplines, including: the social sciences, humanities, physical and biological sciences, mathematics, writing and foreign languages.
  • 34.
    • In 1999,the University of Chicago announced plans to reduce and modify the content of its core curriculum, including lowering the number of required courses from 21 to 15 and offering a wider range of content. When The New York Times, The Economist, and other major news outlets picked up this story, the University became the focal point of a national debate on education. The National Association of Scholars released a statement saying, "It is truly depressing to observe a steady abandonment of the University of Chicago's once imposing undergraduate core curriculum, which for so long stood as the benchmark of content and rigor among American academic institutions. Simultaneously, however, a set of university administrators, notably then-President Hug Sonnenschein, argued that reducing the core curriculum had become both a financial and educational imperative, as the university was struggling to attract a commensurate volume of applicants to its undergraduate division compared to peer schools as a result of what was perceived by the pro-change camp as a reaction by “the average eighteen-year-old” to the expanse of the collegiate core.
  • 35.
    Further, as corecurricula began to be diminished over the course of the twentieth century at many American schools, several smaller institutions became famous for embracing a core curriculum that covers nearly the student’s entire undergraduate education, often utilizing classic texts of the western canon to teach all subjects including science. St. John’s College in the United States is one example of this approach.
  • 36.
    Distribution requirements Somecolleges opt for the middle ground of the continuum between specified and unspecified curricula by using a system of distribution requirements. In such a system, students are required to take courses in particular fields of learning, but are free to choose specific courses within those fields.
  • 37.
    • Other institutionshave largely done away with core requirements in their entirety. Brown University offers the "New Curriculum," implemented after a student-led reform movement in 1969, which allows students to take courses without concern for any requirements except those in their chosen concentrations (majors), plus two writing courses. In this vein it is certainly possible for students to graduate without taking college-level science of mathematics or math courses, or to take only science or math courses. Amherst College requires that students take one of a list of first-year seminars, but has no required classes or distribution requirements. Others include Evergreen State College, Hamilton College, and Smith College.
  • 38.
    Wesleyan University isanother school that has not and does not require any set distribution of courses. However, Wesleyan does make clear "General Education Expectations" such that if a student does not meet these expectations, he/she would not be eligible for academic honors upon graduation.