DEFECT BASED RECONSTRUCTION : EAR
Dr.Ajay Manickam
Junior Resident ENT & Head neck surgery
R. G. Kar Medical College
The Auricle
 The complex 3 dimensional shapes of any
human appendages – skin & cartilage
 Emotional & psychological distress
The auricle
 Cosmetically important structure
History
 Susruta reconstructed ear lobules using local
flaps 600BC
 Autogenous costal cartilages – modern era –
Harold Gillies 1920
 RanfordTanzer 1950 laid foundation for
current ear technique.
Anatomy
 Blood supply (1) posterior branch of
superficial temporal artery & (2) posterior
auricular artery
 Anatomy of periauricular area – most
important
Anatomic axis of the ear
Ear anomalies
 Congenital
 Acquired
Congenital ear anomalies
Tanzer’s classification Cosman’s classification
 Anotia
 Complete hypoplasia
 Hypoplasia of middle third
of auricle
 Hypoplasia of superior
third of auricle
 Prominent ears
 Lidding
 Smaller ear
 Low ear position
Reconstruction of ear
 Stick on ear prosthesis
 Osseo integerated ear prosthesis
 Use of synthetic auricular frames
 Total autologous reconstruction
Stick on ear prosthesis
 Prosthetic pieces
attached using skin
adhesives
 Limitations – may not
attach strongly in mean
time, skin reaction
Osseontegerated ear
prosthesis
 Pliable silicone – shaped &
colour matched with
opposite ear
 Anchorage by bone
anchored osseointegerated
titanium plates
 Limitations – daily cleaning,
risk of local tissue
unflamation
Synthetic auricular frames
 Synthetic frame used to recreate shape of ear
 Frames burried in subcutaneous pocket or
covered with superficial temporal fascia
 Silicone or PTFE
 Better success with temporalis fascia flap
 Significant risk of infection
Total autologous
reconstruction
 Ear frames from autologous costal cartilage
 Burried in subcutaneous pocket or temporalis
fascial flap
 Popular methods are BRENT and NAGATA
Microtia
 Nagata’s
classification
 Lobule type
 Concha type
 Small concha
type
 Anotia
 Atypical
microtia
Microtia repair
Brent technique Nagata technique
 5 years of age
 Four stages
 6th, 7th, 8th, costal cartilages
harvested
 Nylon sutures
 Auricular projection
involves only skin graft
 10 – 12 years of age
 Two stages
 6th, 7th, 8th, costal cartilages
harvested
 Stainless steel sutures
 Auricular projection
involves cartilage wedge
sup temporal artery flap
Acquired ear defects
 Partial defects – direct closure, local tissues,
autologous reconstruction
 Total defects – congenital total defect
 Skin only defects – full thickness skin flap,
local flaps
Reconstructive options
 Upper third – local flaps –VY technique . Post
auricular flap defects involving helical rims
 Middle third – Antia Buch reconstruction &
dieffenbach flap
 Lower third – lobule. Local flaps are used
 Defects of the concha – trapdoor flaps
Defects upto 1.5cm wide can be excised as a
wedge and closed directly
Upper third local flaps
VY flaps – helical rims or marginal
reconstruction defect
Pedicled flap based on post auricular
artery
Middle third
We can use post auricular artery
based flaps
Dieffenbach flap – staged
reconstruction of pinna
Antia buch advancement flap –
incorporates chondrocutaneous
segment – but smaller ear
Lower third
Local flaps are used one or two stage
procedure
Often Non anatomical cartilage graft can
give support for reconstructed ear lobule
Defects of concha
 Trapdoor flaps are used for this purpose
 Flap is inset after tunnelling through post part
of the auricular defect
Partial ear defects
 Local flaps , skin only flaps may not deliver
best results
 Bespoke cartilage frames are increasingly
used in reconstruction.
Cartilage framework for
pinna reconstruction upper
1/3
Middle third recontruction
Conclusion
 There is yet no ideal alloplastic implant
 Scalp skin grafts provide best texture and
colour match
 Costal cartilage provide best framework
reconstruction
Thank you

Defect based reconstruction of ear

  • 1.
    DEFECT BASED RECONSTRUCTION: EAR Dr.Ajay Manickam Junior Resident ENT & Head neck surgery R. G. Kar Medical College
  • 2.
    The Auricle  Thecomplex 3 dimensional shapes of any human appendages – skin & cartilage  Emotional & psychological distress
  • 3.
    The auricle  Cosmeticallyimportant structure
  • 4.
    History  Susruta reconstructedear lobules using local flaps 600BC  Autogenous costal cartilages – modern era – Harold Gillies 1920  RanfordTanzer 1950 laid foundation for current ear technique.
  • 5.
    Anatomy  Blood supply(1) posterior branch of superficial temporal artery & (2) posterior auricular artery  Anatomy of periauricular area – most important
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Congenital ear anomalies Tanzer’sclassification Cosman’s classification  Anotia  Complete hypoplasia  Hypoplasia of middle third of auricle  Hypoplasia of superior third of auricle  Prominent ears  Lidding  Smaller ear  Low ear position
  • 9.
    Reconstruction of ear Stick on ear prosthesis  Osseo integerated ear prosthesis  Use of synthetic auricular frames  Total autologous reconstruction
  • 10.
    Stick on earprosthesis  Prosthetic pieces attached using skin adhesives  Limitations – may not attach strongly in mean time, skin reaction
  • 11.
    Osseontegerated ear prosthesis  Pliablesilicone – shaped & colour matched with opposite ear  Anchorage by bone anchored osseointegerated titanium plates  Limitations – daily cleaning, risk of local tissue unflamation
  • 12.
    Synthetic auricular frames Synthetic frame used to recreate shape of ear  Frames burried in subcutaneous pocket or covered with superficial temporal fascia  Silicone or PTFE  Better success with temporalis fascia flap  Significant risk of infection
  • 13.
    Total autologous reconstruction  Earframes from autologous costal cartilage  Burried in subcutaneous pocket or temporalis fascial flap  Popular methods are BRENT and NAGATA
  • 14.
    Microtia  Nagata’s classification  Lobuletype  Concha type  Small concha type  Anotia  Atypical microtia
  • 15.
    Microtia repair Brent techniqueNagata technique  5 years of age  Four stages  6th, 7th, 8th, costal cartilages harvested  Nylon sutures  Auricular projection involves only skin graft  10 – 12 years of age  Two stages  6th, 7th, 8th, costal cartilages harvested  Stainless steel sutures  Auricular projection involves cartilage wedge sup temporal artery flap
  • 16.
    Acquired ear defects Partial defects – direct closure, local tissues, autologous reconstruction  Total defects – congenital total defect  Skin only defects – full thickness skin flap, local flaps
  • 17.
    Reconstructive options  Upperthird – local flaps –VY technique . Post auricular flap defects involving helical rims  Middle third – Antia Buch reconstruction & dieffenbach flap  Lower third – lobule. Local flaps are used  Defects of the concha – trapdoor flaps Defects upto 1.5cm wide can be excised as a wedge and closed directly
  • 18.
    Upper third localflaps VY flaps – helical rims or marginal reconstruction defect Pedicled flap based on post auricular artery
  • 19.
    Middle third We canuse post auricular artery based flaps Dieffenbach flap – staged reconstruction of pinna Antia buch advancement flap – incorporates chondrocutaneous segment – but smaller ear
  • 20.
    Lower third Local flapsare used one or two stage procedure Often Non anatomical cartilage graft can give support for reconstructed ear lobule
  • 21.
    Defects of concha Trapdoor flaps are used for this purpose  Flap is inset after tunnelling through post part of the auricular defect
  • 22.
    Partial ear defects Local flaps , skin only flaps may not deliver best results  Bespoke cartilage frames are increasingly used in reconstruction.
  • 23.
    Cartilage framework for pinnareconstruction upper 1/3
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Conclusion  There isyet no ideal alloplastic implant  Scalp skin grafts provide best texture and colour match  Costal cartilage provide best framework reconstruction
  • 26.