DEGENERATIVE
spine
DISEASE
ANATOMY OF SPINE
1). INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
2). VERTEBRAL BODY/ END
PLATE CHANGES
3). DEGENERATIVE CHANGES OF
POSTERIOR ELEMENTS
1. INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Anatomy of the intervertebral disc
The Intervertebral Disc
Two major components
 Annulus fibrosis: thick, fibrous
“radial tire” called lamellae
 Nucleus pulposus: ball-like gel
The disc
intervertebral disc
In 2001, the Combined Task Forces of the North
American Spine Society, American Society of Spine
Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology
proposed a new nomenclature and consistent
classification system, intended for the reporting of
imaging studies.
(Fardon and Milette 2001; Milette 2001).
CLASSIFICATION & NOMENCLATURE
DEGENERATIVE
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISEASE
A. ) - DISC BULGE
B. ) - ANNULAR TEAR
C. ) - HERNIATION
PROTUSION
EXTRUSION
INTRAVERTEBRAL
Degenerative changes of the disc
Pathological changes
 Water and proteoglycan content decreases
 Collagen fibers of AF become distorted
 Tears may occur in the lamellae
 Results in:
 Decreased disc height and volume
 Decreased resistance to loads
• X-ray: show spinal degenerative changes but
not a herniated disc; rule out obvious
underlying problems;
• CT: relatively less used;
• MRI: The best;
Imaging
A ) DISC BULGE
Generalized or circumferential disc displacement (involving 50% to 100%
of the disc circumference) is known as “bulging”, and is not considered a
form of herniation. Bulging can be symmetrical (displacement of disc
material is equal in all directions) or asymmetrical (frequently associated
with scoliosis)
The term bulge refers to a morphologic characteristic and is not
correlated with etiology or symptomatology. Bulging can be physiologic
(e.g. in the mid-cervical spine and at L5–S1), can reflect advanced
degenerative disc disease, can be associated with bone remodeling (as
in advanced osteoporosis), occur with ligamentous laxity, or can be a
“pseudo image” due to partial volume averaging
(Fardon and Milette 2001).
a–c. Symmetrical and asymmetrical bulging disc on transverse CT or MRI
scans.
a ) - Normally the intervertebral disc (gray) does not extend beyond the edges
of the ring apophyses (black line).
b ) - In a symmetrically bulging disc, the disc tissue extends concentrically
beyond the edges of the ring apophyses (50%–100% of disc circumference).
c ) - An asymmetrical bulging disc can be associated with scoliosis. Bulging
discs are not considered a form of herniation
a b c
B ). ANNULAR TEAR
Disruption of concentric collagenous fibers comprising
the anulus fibrosus
MR Findings
• T1WI: Contrast-enhancing nidus in disc margin
• T2WI: High signal zone at edge of disc which has low intrinsic
signal
Concentric tearsare circumferential lesions which are found in the outer
layers of the annular wall (Martin et al. 2002). They represent splitting between
adjacent lamellae of the annulus, like onion rings. Concentric tears are most
commonly encountered in the outer annulus fibrosus, and are believed to be of
traumatic origin especially from torsion overload injuries.
Radial tears are characterized by an annular tear which permeates from the
deep central part of the disc (nucleus pulposus) and extends outward toward the
annulus, in either a transverse or cranial-caudal plane.
Transverse tears, also known as “peripheral tears” or “rim lesions,” are
horizontal ruptures of fibers, near the insertion in the bony ring apophyses. Their
clinical significance remains unclear. Transverse tears are believed to be traumatically
induced and are often associated with small osteophytes.
TYPES
CONCENTRIC TEARS
TRANSVERSE TEARS /
PERIPHERAL TEARS
RIM LESIONS
RADIAL TEARS
On a CT discography. The black arrows
point to the concentric anular tear in the
periphery of the anulus. The white arrows
points to the central radial tear.
In Fig. #1 the injected dye (black) does not
leak out of the nucleus. This is normal.
Fig.#2 demonstrates a massive Grade 4
radial disc tear. Note how the contrast
(black) has leaked out from the center of the
disc through a massive complete radial tear.
L4-L5 CT diskogram demonstrating
a large left posterolateral radial
anular tear associated with a left
foraminal and extraforaminal
herniaton
C). DISC HERNIATION
Herniation is defined as a localized displacement of
disc material (nucleus, cartilage, fragmented
apophyseal bone, fragmented annular tissue) beyond
the limits of the intervertebral disc space.
(Fardon and Milette 2001).
 Intravertebral Herniations
 Protruded Disc
 Extruded Disc
Herniated discs in the cranio-caudal (vertical)
direction through a break in one or both of the
vertebral body endplates are referred to as
“intravertebral herniations” (also known as Schmorl’s
nodes). They are often surrounded by reactive bone
marrow changes.
Nutrient vascular canals may leave scars in the
endplates, which are weak spots representing a route
for the early formation of intrabody nuclear
herniations
(Chandraraj et al. 1998).
INTRAVERTEBRAL HERNIATIONS
Protrusions
Extruded
Sequestered
The terminology “protruded disc” is used when the base
of the disc is broader than any other diameter of the
displaced material.
Based on a two-dimensional assessment of the disc
contour in the transverse plane, a protruded disc can be
focal (involving <25% of the disc circumference) or
broad-based (involving 25%–50% of the disc circumference).
“PROTRUDED DISC
Types of disc herniation as seen on transverse CT or MRI
scans.
a, b Protrusions: the base of the herniated disc material is
broader than the apex. Protrusions can be broad-based (a) or
focal (b)
The terminology “extruded disc” is used for a focal disc
extension of which the base against the parent disc is
narrower than the diameter of the extruded disc material,
measured in the same plane.
EXTRUDED DISC HERNIATIONS
Extrusion: the base of the herniation is
narrower than the apex (toothpaste sign)
Massive lumbar disc extrusion at L5–S1 in a 44-year-old man. Sagittal (a)
and axial (b) T1-weighted images; sagittal (c) and axial (d) T2-weighted
images. The extruded disc compresses and displaces the right S1 nerve
root. On the sagittal T1-weighted image, the continuity between the
extruding portion and the parent disc can clearly be identified.
Extrusion is also used when there is no continuity between the
herniated disc material beyond the disc space and that within the disc
space
If the displaced disc material has no connection with the parent disc, it
is called a “sequestrated fragment” (Fig. 6.19). This is synonymous with
a “free fragment”.
MIGRATION – SEQUESTRATION
Migration
indicates displacement of disc material away from the site of extrusion, regardless of whether
sequestrated or not.
Sequestration
indicate that the displaced disc material has lost completely any continuity with the parent disc
A,- Small subligamentous herniation (protrusion) without significant disk material migration.
B, - Subligamentous herniation with downward migration of disk material under the PLLC.
C, - Sub-ligamentous herniation with downward migration of disk material and sequestered
fragment (arrow).
3) . Vertebral Endplates and Bone Marrow
Changes
three degenerative stages of vertebral endplates and subchondral
bone (Modic et al. 1988a,b)
• Modic type 1 changes - acute inflammatory stage, and can
be associated with substantial functional disability.
• naturally transform into type 2 lesions (Mitra et al. 2004).
• The transformation usually takes place over a time course
of 1–2 years, and can relate to a change in patient’s
symptoms (Parizel et al. 1999).
Degenerative Changes of the
Posterior Elements
1. Facet Joints
2. Ligamentum Flavum
3. Spinal Canal
4. Spinous Process
5. Nerve root
The double obliquity of the facet joints in transverse and sagittal
planes, and the curvature of the articular surfaces makes plain films
less suited to the evaluation of facet joint degeneration.
(Grenier et al. 1987)
Only the portion of each joint that is oriented parallel to the X-ray
beam is visible. Although it is a moderately insensitive technique
compared to CT, it may be valuable in screening for facet joint
osteoarthritis.
(Pathria et al. 1987).
Osteophytes, hyperostosis and facet joint narrowing may be
observed on plain film; also concomitant spondylolisthesis may be
demonstrated by standard radio-of posterior soft tissue elements
(i.e. ligamentum flavum) and measurement of the transverse
diameter of the spinal canal.
(Grenier et al. 1987).
MODALITY OF CHOICE
More subtle changes, e.g. cartilage changes, and subchondral erosions
can be better analyzed on axial CT and MR imaging. Both techniques
have intrinsic high spatial and contrast resolution. In general there is
moderate to good agreement between MR imaging and CT in the
assessment of facet joint osteoarthritis. Therefore, in the presence of
an MR examination,CT is not required for the evaluation of facet joint
degeneration. Conversely, it was demonstrated that CT was superior
to MR imaging in the depiction of joint space narrowing and
subchondral sclerosis.
(Weishaupt et al. 1999).
Using MR imaging, sagittal views are preferred for identifying the
pathological level(s), measuring the sagittal diameter of the spinal
canal, and for grading foraminal stenosis. Axial images at appropriate
levels are preferred for a more precise analysis of the facet joints
(cartilage, osteophytes)
Facet Joints
Degenerative changes of the facet
joint
Degenerative Changes
 Cartilage lining loses
water content
 Cartilage wears away
 Facets override each
other
 Leads to abnormal
function of motion
segment
Osteoarthritis of the Facet Joints
Osteophyte is excrescent new bone formation, lacking a medullary
space, arsing from the margin of the joint. Osteophytes protruding
ventrally from the anteromedial aspect of the facet joints may narrow
the lateral recesses and intervertebral foramina causing central or
lateral spinal canal stenosis .
(Wybier 2001).
Hypertrophy was defined as enlargement of an articular process with
normal proportions of its medullary cavity and cortex .
(Carrera et al. 1980).
Pathria et al. (1987) used a four-point scale to grade facet joint
osteoarthritis on oblique radiographs and CT scans. These criteria were
refined by Weishaupt et al. (1999) who used these criteria for grading
osteoarthritis of the facet joints on CT and MR imaging.
GRADE CRITERIA
0 Normal facet joint space (2–4 mm width)
1 Narrowing of the facet joint space (<2 mm) and/or small osteophytes and/or
mild hypertrophy of the articular processes
2 Narrowing of the facet joint space and/or moderate osteophytes and/or
moderate hypertrophy of the articular processes and/or mild subarticular
bone erosions
3 Narrowing of the facet joint space and/or large osteophytes and/or severe
hypertrophy of the articular processes and/or severe subarticular bone
erosions and/or subchondral cysts
(a)
(b)
VACUUM PHENOMENA
Involving the intervertebral disc relate to the
accumulation of gas, principally nitrogen, in crevices
within the intervertebral disk or vertebra. While they
can commonly occur with intervertebral disc
degerative disease, their appearance does not
uniformly indicate "degenerative" disc disease, as
gaseous collections may accompany other processes
(vertebral osteomyelitis, Schmorl node formation,
spondylosis deformans, vertebral collapse with
osteonecrosis) affecting the disc and adjacent
vertebral bodies.
(b)
(a)
Associated Soft Tissue Changes
Soft tissue changes associated with facet joint degeneration
include: degenerative cysts arising from the facet joints (so-
called Juxtafacet cysts), ligamentum flavum cysts, and
hypertrophy and/or calcification of the ligamentum flavum
Degenerative cysts arising from the facet
joints: juxtafacet cysts
Synovial cysts are periarticular cysts of the synovial membrane, with a
membrane attached to the joint capsule. They contain clear or yellow
mucinous fluid or gas. The walls are of loose myxoid connective or
fibrocollagenous tissue with a synovial lining. In contrast, ganglion cysts
have no connection to the joint and no synovial lining. They contain
myxoid material. The consistency of fluid within the cysts varies greatly
because of hemorrhage and inflammation.
(Stoodley et al. 2000).
The signal intensity of the cysts is equal to or slightly
greater than that of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on both T1-
and T2-weighted images. Synovial cysts with high signal on
T1- and T2-weighted images indicate the presence of
subacute breakdown products of blood. All synovial cysts
have a low signal intensity rim at the periphery that is
accentuated on long TR/TE sequences. After administration
of gadolinium these cysts show rim enhancement.
( Tillich et al. 2001).
a
b
d
c
The typical appearance on CT is of a rounded mass of low
attenuation adjacent to the facet joint. CT may show egg-shell
calcifications of the wall of the cyst (Lunardi et al. 1999) and gas
inside the cyst.
(Stoodley et al. 2000).
2). LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM
 Degenerative Changes
 Partial ruptures, necrosis
and calcifications
 Negatively impact function
of motion segment
CYSTS OF THE LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM
The development of these cysts may be related to necrosis or
myxoid degeneration occurring in a hypertrophied
ligamentum flavum.
(Cakir et al. 2004).
Chronic degenerative changes in the ligamentum flavum,
followed by (repeated) hemorrhage gives rise to small
degenerative cysts which enlarge and coalesce to form a large
cyst.
( Cakir et al. 2004).
On imaging, an intraspinal, extradural mass adjacent
to the ligamentum flavum is found. On CT, the lesion
has a low density attenuation. Unlike in synovial or
ganglion cysts, rim calcification has not been
reported.
(Terada et al. 2001)
On MRI, a well defined, round to ovoid cystic mass
lesion is observed. It has a high signal intensity on T2-
weighted images with a low signal intensity rim. Thick
peripheral enhancement after gadolinium injection is
seen.
( Mahalatti et al. 1999).
LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM HYPERTROPHY
Symmetrical thickening of the ligamentum flavam is a frequently
observed finding in facet joint arthropathy. It results from joint
effusion, progressive ligamentousfibrosis, calcification and/or
ossification.
(Wybier 2001).
Calcifications of the ligamentum flavam have been observed in
patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis(DISH) and
ankylosing spondylitis. Calcifications are also associated with metabolic
diseases such as renal failure, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism,
hemochromatosis, and pseudogout. At the periarticular level, however,
it is generally considered a sign of degenerative disease, whereas at
the levels of insertions, it is considered a normal variant related to
traction.
(Ruiz Santiago et al. 1997).
MRI of spinal stenosis: arrow points to the
moderately stenotic spinal canal caused by
hypertrophic facets and ligament flavum
Histopathological examination of OLF typically shows mature
bone. The ligamentum flavum is progressively replaced by
lamellar bone through a process of endochondral ossification.
This process appears to begin near the facet joint, at the
junction between the joint capsule and the ligamentum fl
avum, where a proliferation of cartilaginous tissue triggers the
ossification.
(Pascal-Moussellard et al. 2005).
Calcification and/or ossification of the thoracic
ligamentum flava (OLF)
Spinal involvement with calcification of the ligamenta flava due to
calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) deposition disease, also known
as pseudogout, is rare, but may also lead to spinal stenosis and spinal
cord compression. When involved, the cervical and lumbar regions are
commonly affected.
(Muthukumar et al. 2000).
CPPD deposition may be associated with hyperparathyroidism and
haemochromatosis.
(Brown et al. 1991).
DISH
Bulky flowing ossification of anterior
longitudinal Ligament (ALL) diffuse
idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH),
ALSO calledsenile ankylosing hyperostosis,
asymmetrical skeletal hyperostosis,
forestier disease
OPLL
Ossification
of posterior
longitudinal
ligament
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
Spondylolisthesis (also known as anterolisthesis) is defined as an
anterior displacement of a vertebra relative to the vertebra below,
whereas the reverse, i.e. when the superior vertebra slips posterior to
that below, is called retrolisthesis
(Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
Degenerative spondylolisthesis, first described by Newman
(Newman 1955), most frequently is found at the lumbar and
cervical level. In contrast to what happens in isthmic
spondylolisthesis, particularly if bilateral, there is a spinal
canal stenosis due to arthritic facet joints and hypertrophic
yellow ligaments with associated narrowing of the neural
foramen and the lateral recess (Fig. 8.8). Obliterated anterior
fat tissue, lost periradicular tissue, and compression of the
dural sac are observed. If unilateral, the side of the
degenerated facet joints is mostly stressed (Osborn 1994).
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
GRADING OF LUMBAR
SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
The forward slip of the upper vertebra is measured using the
method of Meyerding, or the method described by Taillard.
Using the method of Meyerding, the anteroposterior (AP)
diameter of the superior surface of the lower vertebra is
divided into quarters and a grade of I– IV is assigned to slips
of one, two, three or four quarters of the superior vertebra,
respectively. The other method, described by Taillard,
expresses the degree of slip as a percentage of the AP
diameter of the top of the lower vertebra .
(Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
Type Cause
1. Dysplastic Congenital dysplasia of the articular processes
2. Isthmic Defect in the pars articularis
3. Degenerative Degenerative changes in the facet joints
4. Traumatic Fracture of the neural arch other than the pars articularis
5. Pathological Weakening of the neural arch due to disorders of the bone
6. Iatrogenic Excessive removal of bone following spinal decompression
BASED ON ETIOLOGY, SPONDYLOLISTHESIS HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED BY
WILTSE ET AL.(1976)
A REVISED VERSION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION
Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurs when a bilateral defect in the
pars interarticularis is present. The pars interarticularis (also
known as the isthmus) is the part of the neural arch that joins
the superior and inferior articular processes. A defect at this
point functionally separates the vertebral body, pedicle, and
superior articular process from the inferior articular process
and remainder of the vertebra.
TYPE 2, ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS:
SPONDYLOLYSIS
As the neural arch is intact, even a small progression in the slip may
cause cauda equina syndrome. Women are four times more affected
than men. Most commonly, the L4–L5 level is involved and its
incidence increases four times if there is a sacralized L5. Clinical
symptoms include low-back pain and leg pain as a result of disc and
facet joint degeneration, lateral recess and foraminal stenosis
leading to nerve root compression. With progression of the
spondylolisthesis, the symptoms may change from low-back pain to
neurogenic claudication due to central canal stenosis .
(Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
Lateral plain fi lm shows anterolisthesis, degenerative changes of the
facet joints, and disc space narrowing. Malalignment of the spinous
processes with anterior slip of the spinous process relative to the
spinous process of the lower vertebra allows differentiation from
isthmic spondylolisthesis (Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
Type 3, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
(a)
(b)
(d)(c)
Spinous Process Abnormalities (Baastrup’s Disease)and
Associated Ligamentous Changes
Baastrup’s disease, also known as kissing spine, has been
described as a cause of low-back pain. It is characterized by close
approximation and contact of adjacent spinous processes with
resultant enlargement, flattening and reactive sclerosis of the
apposing interspinous surfaces (Chen et al. 2004).
Neoarthrosis between the spinous processes has been
described. Patients with Baastrup’s disease may experience pain
owing to irritation of the periosteum or adventitial bursae between
abutting spinous processes (Pinto et al. 2004).
Interspinous bursitis may communicate with the facet joints at
the same intervertebral level. They may be treated with steroid
injections (Wybier 2001).
(a) (b)
THANK YOU
The normal intervertebral foramen is shaped like an inverted
teardrop, and its height and crosssectionalarea vary from 11
to 19 m.m. and from 40 to 160 mm2, respectively. The
intervertebral foramen of the lumbar spine changes
significantly not only on fl exion-extension but also on lateral
bending and axial rotation (Fujiwara et al. 2001b). Foraminal
height ranges between 19 mm and 21 mm and the superior
and inferior sagittal diameter of the foramen ranges between
7 mm and 8 mm and between 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively.
(Cinotti et al. 2002).
Instead of measuring the dimensions of the intervertebral
foramen, a qualitative scoring system introduced by
Wildermuth et al.(1998) can be used to determine foraminal
narrowing.
CRITERIA FOR GRADING FORAMINAL OF THE FACET JOINTS
(AFTER WILDERMUTH ET AL. 1998)
GRADE Criteria
0 Normal intervertebral foramina; normal dorsolateral border of the intervertebral
disc and normal form at the foraminal epidural fat (oval or inverted pear shape)
1 Slight foraminal stenosis and deformity of the epidural fat, with the remaining fat
still completely surrounding the exiting nerve root.
2 Marked foraminal stenosis, with epidural fat only partially surrounding the nerve
root.
3 Advanced stenosis with obliteration of the epidural fat.
1. DEGENERATIVE END PLATE CHANGES
2. DISC BULGE
3. ANNULAR TEAR
4. DISC HERNIATION
5. I. V. D. EXTRUSION / PROTRUSION
6. FACET ARTHROPATHY
7. FACET JOINT SYNOVIAL CYST
8. BAASTRUP DIEASE
9. BERTOLOTTI SYNDROME
10. SCHEUERMANN DIEASE
11. STENOSIS
12. D.I.S.H.
13. O.P.L.L.
14. OSSIFICATION LIGAMENTUM
15. PERIODONTOID PSEUTUMOR
NEURAL ARCH
Excessive lumbar lordosis is frequently associated
with spine degeneration, especially in women
after menopause. Approximation of adjacent
vertebral neural arches may result in abnormal
bony contacts in different areas and may even
result in a neoarthrosis
(Wybier 2001).
Associated remodelling or bony sclerosis of the
NEURAL ARCH INTERVERTEBRAL NEOARTH
annular tears
rim lesion
concentric tear
radial tear
Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, et al. “Annular Tears & Disc Degeneration” J Bone Joint Surg.
[Br] 1992; 74-B:678-82
Gordon SJ, Yang KH, Mayer PJ, et al: Mechanism of disc rupture. A preliminary report.
Spine 16:450-456, 1991
internal disruption
Crock HV, Internal disc disruption. A challenge to disc prolapse fifty years on. Spine
1986 ;11:650-3
Pathology of Intervertebral Disc Injury
• Annular Injury
– Annular rings
• Softened
• Overstretched
• Torn
– Normal viscoelasticity is exceeded
– Cannot stabilize or limit motion
– Nucleus pulposus exerts pressure on weak part
– Buckling occurs - Disc Bulge
Pathology of Intervertebral Disc Injury
• Extrusion
– Fragmentation of
nucleus pulposus
– Nuclear material
dissects its way through
breaches in annulus
fibrosus
Pathology of Intervertebral Disc Injury
• Prolapses
– Fissures provide
pathway for irritating
nuclear fluid to escape
onto perineural tissue *
• Persistent and chronic
back pain
*- Hampton et al
(a)
(b)1
(d)(c)
Classification
 Central stenosis;
 Lateral recess stenosis;
 Foramen stenosis;

Degenerative spine

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 4.
    1). INTERVERTEBRAL DISC 2).VERTEBRAL BODY/ END PLATE CHANGES 3). DEGENERATIVE CHANGES OF POSTERIOR ELEMENTS
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Anatomy of theintervertebral disc The Intervertebral Disc Two major components  Annulus fibrosis: thick, fibrous “radial tire” called lamellae  Nucleus pulposus: ball-like gel
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    In 2001, theCombined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology proposed a new nomenclature and consistent classification system, intended for the reporting of imaging studies. (Fardon and Milette 2001; Milette 2001). CLASSIFICATION & NOMENCLATURE
  • 11.
    DEGENERATIVE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISEASE A.) - DISC BULGE B. ) - ANNULAR TEAR C. ) - HERNIATION PROTUSION EXTRUSION INTRAVERTEBRAL
  • 12.
    Degenerative changes ofthe disc Pathological changes  Water and proteoglycan content decreases  Collagen fibers of AF become distorted  Tears may occur in the lamellae  Results in:  Decreased disc height and volume  Decreased resistance to loads
  • 13.
    • X-ray: showspinal degenerative changes but not a herniated disc; rule out obvious underlying problems; • CT: relatively less used; • MRI: The best; Imaging
  • 14.
    A ) DISCBULGE Generalized or circumferential disc displacement (involving 50% to 100% of the disc circumference) is known as “bulging”, and is not considered a form of herniation. Bulging can be symmetrical (displacement of disc material is equal in all directions) or asymmetrical (frequently associated with scoliosis) The term bulge refers to a morphologic characteristic and is not correlated with etiology or symptomatology. Bulging can be physiologic (e.g. in the mid-cervical spine and at L5–S1), can reflect advanced degenerative disc disease, can be associated with bone remodeling (as in advanced osteoporosis), occur with ligamentous laxity, or can be a “pseudo image” due to partial volume averaging (Fardon and Milette 2001).
  • 15.
    a–c. Symmetrical andasymmetrical bulging disc on transverse CT or MRI scans. a ) - Normally the intervertebral disc (gray) does not extend beyond the edges of the ring apophyses (black line). b ) - In a symmetrically bulging disc, the disc tissue extends concentrically beyond the edges of the ring apophyses (50%–100% of disc circumference). c ) - An asymmetrical bulging disc can be associated with scoliosis. Bulging discs are not considered a form of herniation a b c
  • 18.
    B ). ANNULARTEAR Disruption of concentric collagenous fibers comprising the anulus fibrosus MR Findings • T1WI: Contrast-enhancing nidus in disc margin • T2WI: High signal zone at edge of disc which has low intrinsic signal
  • 20.
    Concentric tearsare circumferentiallesions which are found in the outer layers of the annular wall (Martin et al. 2002). They represent splitting between adjacent lamellae of the annulus, like onion rings. Concentric tears are most commonly encountered in the outer annulus fibrosus, and are believed to be of traumatic origin especially from torsion overload injuries. Radial tears are characterized by an annular tear which permeates from the deep central part of the disc (nucleus pulposus) and extends outward toward the annulus, in either a transverse or cranial-caudal plane. Transverse tears, also known as “peripheral tears” or “rim lesions,” are horizontal ruptures of fibers, near the insertion in the bony ring apophyses. Their clinical significance remains unclear. Transverse tears are believed to be traumatically induced and are often associated with small osteophytes. TYPES
  • 21.
    CONCENTRIC TEARS TRANSVERSE TEARS/ PERIPHERAL TEARS RIM LESIONS RADIAL TEARS
  • 23.
    On a CTdiscography. The black arrows point to the concentric anular tear in the periphery of the anulus. The white arrows points to the central radial tear. In Fig. #1 the injected dye (black) does not leak out of the nucleus. This is normal. Fig.#2 demonstrates a massive Grade 4 radial disc tear. Note how the contrast (black) has leaked out from the center of the disc through a massive complete radial tear.
  • 24.
    L4-L5 CT diskogramdemonstrating a large left posterolateral radial anular tear associated with a left foraminal and extraforaminal herniaton
  • 25.
    C). DISC HERNIATION Herniationis defined as a localized displacement of disc material (nucleus, cartilage, fragmented apophyseal bone, fragmented annular tissue) beyond the limits of the intervertebral disc space. (Fardon and Milette 2001).  Intravertebral Herniations  Protruded Disc  Extruded Disc
  • 26.
    Herniated discs inthe cranio-caudal (vertical) direction through a break in one or both of the vertebral body endplates are referred to as “intravertebral herniations” (also known as Schmorl’s nodes). They are often surrounded by reactive bone marrow changes. Nutrient vascular canals may leave scars in the endplates, which are weak spots representing a route for the early formation of intrabody nuclear herniations (Chandraraj et al. 1998). INTRAVERTEBRAL HERNIATIONS
  • 28.
  • 29.
    The terminology “protrudeddisc” is used when the base of the disc is broader than any other diameter of the displaced material. Based on a two-dimensional assessment of the disc contour in the transverse plane, a protruded disc can be focal (involving <25% of the disc circumference) or broad-based (involving 25%–50% of the disc circumference). “PROTRUDED DISC
  • 30.
    Types of discherniation as seen on transverse CT or MRI scans. a, b Protrusions: the base of the herniated disc material is broader than the apex. Protrusions can be broad-based (a) or focal (b)
  • 32.
    The terminology “extrudeddisc” is used for a focal disc extension of which the base against the parent disc is narrower than the diameter of the extruded disc material, measured in the same plane. EXTRUDED DISC HERNIATIONS Extrusion: the base of the herniation is narrower than the apex (toothpaste sign)
  • 34.
    Massive lumbar discextrusion at L5–S1 in a 44-year-old man. Sagittal (a) and axial (b) T1-weighted images; sagittal (c) and axial (d) T2-weighted images. The extruded disc compresses and displaces the right S1 nerve root. On the sagittal T1-weighted image, the continuity between the extruding portion and the parent disc can clearly be identified.
  • 36.
    Extrusion is alsoused when there is no continuity between the herniated disc material beyond the disc space and that within the disc space If the displaced disc material has no connection with the parent disc, it is called a “sequestrated fragment” (Fig. 6.19). This is synonymous with a “free fragment”.
  • 37.
    MIGRATION – SEQUESTRATION Migration indicatesdisplacement of disc material away from the site of extrusion, regardless of whether sequestrated or not. Sequestration indicate that the displaced disc material has lost completely any continuity with the parent disc
  • 38.
    A,- Small subligamentousherniation (protrusion) without significant disk material migration. B, - Subligamentous herniation with downward migration of disk material under the PLLC. C, - Sub-ligamentous herniation with downward migration of disk material and sequestered fragment (arrow).
  • 40.
    3) . VertebralEndplates and Bone Marrow Changes three degenerative stages of vertebral endplates and subchondral bone (Modic et al. 1988a,b)
  • 44.
    • Modic type1 changes - acute inflammatory stage, and can be associated with substantial functional disability. • naturally transform into type 2 lesions (Mitra et al. 2004). • The transformation usually takes place over a time course of 1–2 years, and can relate to a change in patient’s symptoms (Parizel et al. 1999).
  • 45.
    Degenerative Changes ofthe Posterior Elements 1. Facet Joints 2. Ligamentum Flavum 3. Spinal Canal 4. Spinous Process 5. Nerve root
  • 46.
    The double obliquityof the facet joints in transverse and sagittal planes, and the curvature of the articular surfaces makes plain films less suited to the evaluation of facet joint degeneration. (Grenier et al. 1987) Only the portion of each joint that is oriented parallel to the X-ray beam is visible. Although it is a moderately insensitive technique compared to CT, it may be valuable in screening for facet joint osteoarthritis. (Pathria et al. 1987). Osteophytes, hyperostosis and facet joint narrowing may be observed on plain film; also concomitant spondylolisthesis may be demonstrated by standard radio-of posterior soft tissue elements (i.e. ligamentum flavum) and measurement of the transverse diameter of the spinal canal. (Grenier et al. 1987). MODALITY OF CHOICE
  • 47.
    More subtle changes,e.g. cartilage changes, and subchondral erosions can be better analyzed on axial CT and MR imaging. Both techniques have intrinsic high spatial and contrast resolution. In general there is moderate to good agreement between MR imaging and CT in the assessment of facet joint osteoarthritis. Therefore, in the presence of an MR examination,CT is not required for the evaluation of facet joint degeneration. Conversely, it was demonstrated that CT was superior to MR imaging in the depiction of joint space narrowing and subchondral sclerosis. (Weishaupt et al. 1999). Using MR imaging, sagittal views are preferred for identifying the pathological level(s), measuring the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal, and for grading foraminal stenosis. Axial images at appropriate levels are preferred for a more precise analysis of the facet joints (cartilage, osteophytes)
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Degenerative changes ofthe facet joint Degenerative Changes  Cartilage lining loses water content  Cartilage wears away  Facets override each other  Leads to abnormal function of motion segment
  • 50.
    Osteoarthritis of theFacet Joints Osteophyte is excrescent new bone formation, lacking a medullary space, arsing from the margin of the joint. Osteophytes protruding ventrally from the anteromedial aspect of the facet joints may narrow the lateral recesses and intervertebral foramina causing central or lateral spinal canal stenosis . (Wybier 2001). Hypertrophy was defined as enlargement of an articular process with normal proportions of its medullary cavity and cortex . (Carrera et al. 1980).
  • 53.
    Pathria et al.(1987) used a four-point scale to grade facet joint osteoarthritis on oblique radiographs and CT scans. These criteria were refined by Weishaupt et al. (1999) who used these criteria for grading osteoarthritis of the facet joints on CT and MR imaging. GRADE CRITERIA 0 Normal facet joint space (2–4 mm width) 1 Narrowing of the facet joint space (<2 mm) and/or small osteophytes and/or mild hypertrophy of the articular processes 2 Narrowing of the facet joint space and/or moderate osteophytes and/or moderate hypertrophy of the articular processes and/or mild subarticular bone erosions 3 Narrowing of the facet joint space and/or large osteophytes and/or severe hypertrophy of the articular processes and/or severe subarticular bone erosions and/or subchondral cysts
  • 54.
  • 55.
    VACUUM PHENOMENA Involving theintervertebral disc relate to the accumulation of gas, principally nitrogen, in crevices within the intervertebral disk or vertebra. While they can commonly occur with intervertebral disc degerative disease, their appearance does not uniformly indicate "degenerative" disc disease, as gaseous collections may accompany other processes (vertebral osteomyelitis, Schmorl node formation, spondylosis deformans, vertebral collapse with osteonecrosis) affecting the disc and adjacent vertebral bodies.
  • 57.
  • 58.
    Associated Soft TissueChanges Soft tissue changes associated with facet joint degeneration include: degenerative cysts arising from the facet joints (so- called Juxtafacet cysts), ligamentum flavum cysts, and hypertrophy and/or calcification of the ligamentum flavum
  • 59.
    Degenerative cysts arisingfrom the facet joints: juxtafacet cysts Synovial cysts are periarticular cysts of the synovial membrane, with a membrane attached to the joint capsule. They contain clear or yellow mucinous fluid or gas. The walls are of loose myxoid connective or fibrocollagenous tissue with a synovial lining. In contrast, ganglion cysts have no connection to the joint and no synovial lining. They contain myxoid material. The consistency of fluid within the cysts varies greatly because of hemorrhage and inflammation. (Stoodley et al. 2000).
  • 60.
    The signal intensityof the cysts is equal to or slightly greater than that of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Synovial cysts with high signal on T1- and T2-weighted images indicate the presence of subacute breakdown products of blood. All synovial cysts have a low signal intensity rim at the periphery that is accentuated on long TR/TE sequences. After administration of gadolinium these cysts show rim enhancement. ( Tillich et al. 2001).
  • 61.
  • 63.
    The typical appearanceon CT is of a rounded mass of low attenuation adjacent to the facet joint. CT may show egg-shell calcifications of the wall of the cyst (Lunardi et al. 1999) and gas inside the cyst. (Stoodley et al. 2000).
  • 65.
  • 66.
     Degenerative Changes Partial ruptures, necrosis and calcifications  Negatively impact function of motion segment
  • 67.
    CYSTS OF THELIGAMENTUM FLAVUM The development of these cysts may be related to necrosis or myxoid degeneration occurring in a hypertrophied ligamentum flavum. (Cakir et al. 2004). Chronic degenerative changes in the ligamentum flavum, followed by (repeated) hemorrhage gives rise to small degenerative cysts which enlarge and coalesce to form a large cyst. ( Cakir et al. 2004).
  • 68.
    On imaging, anintraspinal, extradural mass adjacent to the ligamentum flavum is found. On CT, the lesion has a low density attenuation. Unlike in synovial or ganglion cysts, rim calcification has not been reported. (Terada et al. 2001) On MRI, a well defined, round to ovoid cystic mass lesion is observed. It has a high signal intensity on T2- weighted images with a low signal intensity rim. Thick peripheral enhancement after gadolinium injection is seen. ( Mahalatti et al. 1999).
  • 70.
    LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM HYPERTROPHY Symmetricalthickening of the ligamentum flavam is a frequently observed finding in facet joint arthropathy. It results from joint effusion, progressive ligamentousfibrosis, calcification and/or ossification. (Wybier 2001). Calcifications of the ligamentum flavam have been observed in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis(DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis. Calcifications are also associated with metabolic diseases such as renal failure, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, hemochromatosis, and pseudogout. At the periarticular level, however, it is generally considered a sign of degenerative disease, whereas at the levels of insertions, it is considered a normal variant related to traction. (Ruiz Santiago et al. 1997).
  • 71.
    MRI of spinalstenosis: arrow points to the moderately stenotic spinal canal caused by hypertrophic facets and ligament flavum
  • 72.
    Histopathological examination ofOLF typically shows mature bone. The ligamentum flavum is progressively replaced by lamellar bone through a process of endochondral ossification. This process appears to begin near the facet joint, at the junction between the joint capsule and the ligamentum fl avum, where a proliferation of cartilaginous tissue triggers the ossification. (Pascal-Moussellard et al. 2005). Calcification and/or ossification of the thoracic ligamentum flava (OLF)
  • 75.
    Spinal involvement withcalcification of the ligamenta flava due to calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) deposition disease, also known as pseudogout, is rare, but may also lead to spinal stenosis and spinal cord compression. When involved, the cervical and lumbar regions are commonly affected. (Muthukumar et al. 2000). CPPD deposition may be associated with hyperparathyroidism and haemochromatosis. (Brown et al. 1991).
  • 76.
    DISH Bulky flowing ossificationof anterior longitudinal Ligament (ALL) diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), ALSO calledsenile ankylosing hyperostosis, asymmetrical skeletal hyperostosis, forestier disease
  • 79.
  • 82.
    SPONDYLOLISTHESIS Spondylolisthesis (also knownas anterolisthesis) is defined as an anterior displacement of a vertebra relative to the vertebra below, whereas the reverse, i.e. when the superior vertebra slips posterior to that below, is called retrolisthesis (Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
  • 83.
    Degenerative spondylolisthesis, firstdescribed by Newman (Newman 1955), most frequently is found at the lumbar and cervical level. In contrast to what happens in isthmic spondylolisthesis, particularly if bilateral, there is a spinal canal stenosis due to arthritic facet joints and hypertrophic yellow ligaments with associated narrowing of the neural foramen and the lateral recess (Fig. 8.8). Obliterated anterior fat tissue, lost periradicular tissue, and compression of the dural sac are observed. If unilateral, the side of the degenerated facet joints is mostly stressed (Osborn 1994). SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
  • 84.
    GRADING OF LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS Theforward slip of the upper vertebra is measured using the method of Meyerding, or the method described by Taillard. Using the method of Meyerding, the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the superior surface of the lower vertebra is divided into quarters and a grade of I– IV is assigned to slips of one, two, three or four quarters of the superior vertebra, respectively. The other method, described by Taillard, expresses the degree of slip as a percentage of the AP diameter of the top of the lower vertebra . (Butt and Saifuddin 2005).
  • 86.
    Type Cause 1. DysplasticCongenital dysplasia of the articular processes 2. Isthmic Defect in the pars articularis 3. Degenerative Degenerative changes in the facet joints 4. Traumatic Fracture of the neural arch other than the pars articularis 5. Pathological Weakening of the neural arch due to disorders of the bone 6. Iatrogenic Excessive removal of bone following spinal decompression BASED ON ETIOLOGY, SPONDYLOLISTHESIS HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED BY WILTSE ET AL.(1976) A REVISED VERSION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION
  • 87.
    Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurswhen a bilateral defect in the pars interarticularis is present. The pars interarticularis (also known as the isthmus) is the part of the neural arch that joins the superior and inferior articular processes. A defect at this point functionally separates the vertebral body, pedicle, and superior articular process from the inferior articular process and remainder of the vertebra. TYPE 2, ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: SPONDYLOLYSIS
  • 90.
    As the neuralarch is intact, even a small progression in the slip may cause cauda equina syndrome. Women are four times more affected than men. Most commonly, the L4–L5 level is involved and its incidence increases four times if there is a sacralized L5. Clinical symptoms include low-back pain and leg pain as a result of disc and facet joint degeneration, lateral recess and foraminal stenosis leading to nerve root compression. With progression of the spondylolisthesis, the symptoms may change from low-back pain to neurogenic claudication due to central canal stenosis . (Butt and Saifuddin 2005). Lateral plain fi lm shows anterolisthesis, degenerative changes of the facet joints, and disc space narrowing. Malalignment of the spinous processes with anterior slip of the spinous process relative to the spinous process of the lower vertebra allows differentiation from isthmic spondylolisthesis (Butt and Saifuddin 2005). Type 3, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
  • 91.
  • 92.
    Spinous Process Abnormalities(Baastrup’s Disease)and Associated Ligamentous Changes Baastrup’s disease, also known as kissing spine, has been described as a cause of low-back pain. It is characterized by close approximation and contact of adjacent spinous processes with resultant enlargement, flattening and reactive sclerosis of the apposing interspinous surfaces (Chen et al. 2004). Neoarthrosis between the spinous processes has been described. Patients with Baastrup’s disease may experience pain owing to irritation of the periosteum or adventitial bursae between abutting spinous processes (Pinto et al. 2004). Interspinous bursitis may communicate with the facet joints at the same intervertebral level. They may be treated with steroid injections (Wybier 2001).
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 98.
    The normal intervertebralforamen is shaped like an inverted teardrop, and its height and crosssectionalarea vary from 11 to 19 m.m. and from 40 to 160 mm2, respectively. The intervertebral foramen of the lumbar spine changes significantly not only on fl exion-extension but also on lateral bending and axial rotation (Fujiwara et al. 2001b). Foraminal height ranges between 19 mm and 21 mm and the superior and inferior sagittal diameter of the foramen ranges between 7 mm and 8 mm and between 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively. (Cinotti et al. 2002). Instead of measuring the dimensions of the intervertebral foramen, a qualitative scoring system introduced by Wildermuth et al.(1998) can be used to determine foraminal narrowing.
  • 99.
    CRITERIA FOR GRADINGFORAMINAL OF THE FACET JOINTS (AFTER WILDERMUTH ET AL. 1998) GRADE Criteria 0 Normal intervertebral foramina; normal dorsolateral border of the intervertebral disc and normal form at the foraminal epidural fat (oval or inverted pear shape) 1 Slight foraminal stenosis and deformity of the epidural fat, with the remaining fat still completely surrounding the exiting nerve root. 2 Marked foraminal stenosis, with epidural fat only partially surrounding the nerve root. 3 Advanced stenosis with obliteration of the epidural fat.
  • 100.
    1. DEGENERATIVE ENDPLATE CHANGES 2. DISC BULGE 3. ANNULAR TEAR 4. DISC HERNIATION 5. I. V. D. EXTRUSION / PROTRUSION 6. FACET ARTHROPATHY 7. FACET JOINT SYNOVIAL CYST
  • 101.
    8. BAASTRUP DIEASE 9.BERTOLOTTI SYNDROME 10. SCHEUERMANN DIEASE 11. STENOSIS 12. D.I.S.H. 13. O.P.L.L. 14. OSSIFICATION LIGAMENTUM 15. PERIODONTOID PSEUTUMOR
  • 103.
    NEURAL ARCH Excessive lumbarlordosis is frequently associated with spine degeneration, especially in women after menopause. Approximation of adjacent vertebral neural arches may result in abnormal bony contacts in different areas and may even result in a neoarthrosis (Wybier 2001). Associated remodelling or bony sclerosis of the NEURAL ARCH INTERVERTEBRAL NEOARTH
  • 105.
    annular tears rim lesion concentrictear radial tear Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, et al. “Annular Tears & Disc Degeneration” J Bone Joint Surg. [Br] 1992; 74-B:678-82 Gordon SJ, Yang KH, Mayer PJ, et al: Mechanism of disc rupture. A preliminary report. Spine 16:450-456, 1991
  • 106.
    internal disruption Crock HV,Internal disc disruption. A challenge to disc prolapse fifty years on. Spine 1986 ;11:650-3
  • 107.
    Pathology of IntervertebralDisc Injury • Annular Injury – Annular rings • Softened • Overstretched • Torn – Normal viscoelasticity is exceeded – Cannot stabilize or limit motion – Nucleus pulposus exerts pressure on weak part – Buckling occurs - Disc Bulge
  • 108.
    Pathology of IntervertebralDisc Injury • Extrusion – Fragmentation of nucleus pulposus – Nuclear material dissects its way through breaches in annulus fibrosus
  • 109.
    Pathology of IntervertebralDisc Injury • Prolapses – Fissures provide pathway for irritating nuclear fluid to escape onto perineural tissue * • Persistent and chronic back pain *- Hampton et al
  • 110.
  • 116.
    Classification  Central stenosis; Lateral recess stenosis;  Foramen stenosis;