Developing Lasting Visions of Effective
Teaching:
Professional Learning Communities
Supporting Learning Across the
Professional Continuum
Nicole Miller Rigelman and Barbara Ruben
Portland State University
March 4, 2011
Session Overview
• Problem Statement
• Conceptual Framework
o Partnership Learning Triangle
o Professional Learning Design Principles
•
•
•
•

Research Questions
Context, Data Collection, and Analysis
Findings and Next Steps
Questions and Discussion
Characteristics of Partner
Schools
• Shared vision of effective teaching and learning.
• Structures that support collaborative professional
learning.
• Recognition of the reciprocal benefits of partnerships
between the university and school.
Design Principles
1. Establish professional learning communities.
2. Connect theory and practice.
3. Elicit student thinking to further learning.
Research Questions
In what ways does collaborative professional learning in a
university/school partnership, focused on deepening student
thinking and reasoning,
o influence the learning of K-8 students, teacher candidates,
mentor teachers, principals, and university faculty; and
o support the development of the teacher candidates’ vision
of what it means to be a teacher (e.g., seek opportunities
to deprivatize their practice and refine their teaching in
collaboration with others and with a focus on student
thinking).
Cohort Structure
• Worked in partnership with two schools.
• Clustered 23 student teachers (n1=9 and n2=14).
• Used primarily a triad model for field placement, forming
classroom-based PLCs.
• Utilized site-based and university-based supervisors.
• Managed dual authorization levels through main and “guest”
placement.
Learning Context
• Engaged in collaborative lesson planning cycles (school
and classroom).
• Teacher candidates completed field-based assignments
and reflective writing and dialogue.
• Established cohort-wide PLC and cohort-based PLCs
(i.e., Critical Friends Groups).
School-based
School-based
Professional Learning
Professional Learning
Community
Community

School-based
School-based
Professional Learning
Professional Learning
Community
Community

ClassroomClassroombased
based
Professional
Professional
Learning
Learning
Community
Community
ClassroomClassroombased
based
Professional
Professional
Learning
Learning
Community
Community

ClassroomClassroombased
based
Professional
Professional
Learning
Learning
Community
Community
ClassroomClassroombased
based
Professional
Professional
Learning
Learning
Community
Community

Cohort Professional
Cohort Professional
Learning Community
Learning Community
CF
CF
G
G
CF
CF
G
G

CF
CF
G
G

CF
CF
G
G
Collaborative Professional
Learning
• Formative Assessment/Collaborative Examination of
Student Work
• Collaborative Lesson Planning through Tuning
Protocol
• Debrief a collaboratively planned lesson using a
process similar to “video club” (c.f. Sherin, Linsenmeier, & van Es, 2006)
The purpose across these sessions was to provide teams
with protocols and tools to support their ongoing
collaboration.
Data Sources – Teacher
Candidates
• Individual written reflections (quarterly)
o summative reflection focused on collaboration
o log reflections focused on connecting field- and
course-based learning
o consultancy group reflections
• Focus group interviews (March and June)
• Observations of the work within the various PLCs
(ongoing)
Data Sources
Mentor Teachers
• Focus group interviews (March and June)
• Observations of the work within the various PLCs
(ongoing)
Principal and Supervisors
• Ongoing conversations
• Interview (June)
Findings: K-8 Student Learning
We’re able to give each other
We’re able to give each other
aa lot of ideas about how to
lot of ideas about how to
take scripted lesson from the
take scripted lesson from the
curriculum and add our own
curriculum and add our own
spin on them to make more
spin on them to make more
meaningful for students.
meaningful for students.

[The students learned]
[The students learned]
flexibility. [They had] aa lot
flexibility. [They had] lot
more individual attention,
more individual attention,
small group attention, ...
small group attention, ...
writing feedback, many
writing feedback, many
adults caring about them.
adults caring about them.

Lower students get
Lower students get
help, higher students
help, higher students
get challenge – good
get challenge – good
model for
model for
differentiated
differentiated
instruction.
instruction.
Findings: K-8 Student Learning
Teacher candidates, mentor teachers, and principals alike
agreed that
o K-8 student learning opportunities were enhanced
through this collaboration.
o increasing the number of adults in the classroom
brought multiple perspectives to the teaching and
learning process allowing adaptations and enhancements
to lessons, differentiation, and attention to individual
student learning.
o multiple adults in the classroom had a positive impact
on relationships with students.
Findings: Teacher Candidate
Learning
IIthink that my favorite part is when we talk
think that my favorite part is when we talk
after teaching. We try to talk after every class
after teaching. We try to talk after every class
to debrief pedagogical moves. It doesn’t
to debrief pedagogical moves. It doesn’t
matter who teaches the lesson, we talk about
matter who teaches the lesson, we talk about
what went on in the classroom, students’
what went on in the classroom, students’
discussions, a-ha moments, or hurdles.
discussions, a-ha moments, or hurdles.
As aastudent myself, IIhave spent the past year
As student myself, have spent the past year
studying about collaboration, meaningful learning,
studying about collaboration, meaningful learning,
and best practice, but IIdon’t think those things
and best practice, but don’t think those things
really sunk in until IIhad the chance to use them in
really sunk in until had the chance to use them in
my classroom every single day, and genuinely
my classroom every single day, and genuinely
understand what it was like to work with other
understand what it was like to work with other
people to make everything IIwas teaching relevant
people to make everything was teaching relevant
and meaningful to each one of my students.
and meaningful to each one of my students.
Findings: Teacher Candidate
Learning
In math class, we have been learning about an inquiry-based
In math class, we have been learning about an inquiry-based
curriculum and how to really allow students to own their
curriculum and how to really allow students to own their
thinking. Through completing assignments such as Inquiring
thinking. Through completing assignments such as Inquiring
to Understand and the Math Talks, IIhave been able to
to Understand and the Math Talks, have been able to
incorporate some of this in the classroom. This not only
incorporate some of this in the classroom. This not only
has shown me what an inquiry-based classroom might look
has shown me what an inquiry-based classroom might look
like, but has given me the chance to understand how my
like, but has given me the chance to understand how my
students think in math, which will only help in future
students think in math, which will only help in future
instruction. Our language arts class has also given me the
instruction. Our language arts class has also given me the
opportunity to understand student thinking through
opportunity to understand student thinking through
conducting reading and writing conferences. Assignments
conducting reading and writing conferences. Assignments
such as these really taught me that the more you know
such as these really taught me that the more you know
about your students, the more effective you will be when
about your students, the more effective you will be when
teaching lessons
teaching lessons
Findings: Teacher Candidate
Learning
Perhaps the biggest effect of this collaborative
Perhaps the biggest effect of this collaborative
model is that what effects one of us effects
model is that what effects one of us effects
the rest of us. If we see someone’s success
the rest of us. If we see someone’s success
we learn from them. If we see someone fail
we learn from them. If we see someone fail
we learn from them too. The more people
we learn from them too. The more people
that are in the mix, the more potential
that are in the mix, the more potential
learning experiences arise. This allow us twice
learning experiences arise. This allow us twice
the experience in the same amount of time.
the experience in the same amount of time.
Findings: Teacher Candidate
Learning
Teacher candidates stated that
o collaboration was central to their learning.
o by deprivatizing their practice, they learned through
their collective successes and failures.
o it was when they were able to implement the
learning from their courses in the field that they
really learned.
o the field based assignments required them
implement strategies in their classrooms that
allowed deep examination of student thinking.
Findings: Teacher Candidate
Learning through Collaborative
Professional Learning
• Teacher candidates described ways that their
mentor’s instructional practice was influenced by…
o thinking more deeply about actions/decisions and
s/he had to articulate reasoning, and
o a willingness to tweak scripted curriculum and
implement innovations due to the extra eyes,
ears, hands…
Findings: Mentor Teacher
Learning
The most common learnings that mentor teachers
identified were
o increased flexibility and
o enhanced communication skills.
Both improved their abilities as a mentor.
Findings: Mentor Teacher
Learning
With regard to their teaching, mentor teachers
o acknowledged alternative approaches to reaching
students, and
o increased their use of technology.
Findings: Mentor Teaching
Learning through Collaborative
Professional Learning
Mentor teachers in focus groups with their peers did
not articulate much learning…
An explanation, offered by each principal
independently, was mentor teachers may not want
to claim learning in front of colleagues/principal.
Findings: Principal Learning
• Clustering student teachers from only one university
allows consistent communication and expectations.
• Mentor teachers need choice in selection and number
of teacher candidates to determine “fit.”
• Field-based assignments should be coordinated with
mentor teachers (i.e., communicate purpose, timing,
results).
• Set parameters for individual versus collaborative
mentoring so that the time is not a burden.
Findings: Teacher Candidate Vision of
What it Means to Teach
Throughout this term, IIhave come to
Throughout this term, have come to
realize that it is my responsibility as aa
realize that it is my responsibility as
teacher to adjust and develop curriculum
teacher to adjust and develop curriculum
that is accessible to every single one of my
that is accessible to every single one of my
students. Although this sounds somewhat
students. Although this sounds somewhat
idealistic, being in the classroom every day
idealistic, being in the classroom every day
has made me see that it is not only totally
has made me see that it is not only totally
possible --it is also totally necessary
possible it is also totally necessary

Because IIam so used
Because am so used
to collaboration, IIam
to collaboration, am
sure IIwill seek it out
sure will seek it out
and try to incorporate
and try to incorporate
it into my future
it into my future
teaching
teaching

This is what IIneed in
This is what need in
my teaching community,
my teaching community,
all of us working hard
all of us working hard
to accomplish goals for
to accomplish goals for
our students, the school
our students, the school
and supporting each
and supporting each
other.
other.
Findings: Teacher Candidate Vision of
What it Means to Teach
[Videorecording] provided an invaluable opportunity to not only
[Videorecording] provided an invaluable opportunity to not only
look at our own teaching, but also to see and hear the interactions
look at our own teaching, but also to see and hear the interactions
of the students as they engaged with each other. This is an
of the students as they engaged with each other. This is an
important experience that I Iwill take with me into my own
important experience that will take with me into my own
classroom. A teacher cannot see and hear all and though much can
classroom. A teacher cannot see and hear all and though much can
be inferred by our informal observations of groups at work and
be inferred by our informal observations of groups at work and
our evaluations and observations of student work and on
our evaluations and observations of student work and on
assessments, video provides aatool to see students behavior when
assessments, video provides tool to see students behavior when
the teacher isn’t next to them and to gain insight into their
the teacher isn’t next to them and to gain insight into their
interactions, their teamwork and communication, and their
interactions, their teamwork and communication, and their
understanding based on aamuch longer period of time. This seems
understanding based on much longer period of time. This seems
especially important with aateacher working alone in aaroom. There
especially important with teacher working alone in room. There
is no way that I Iwould be able to pull away from my teaching
is no way that would be able to pull away from my teaching
responsibilities within aalesson to just watch and listen to aagroup
responsibilities within lesson to just watch and listen to group
for 10 or more minutes, but aavideo camera can be that observer
for 10 or more minutes, but video camera can be that observer
for me. This also is aavaluable tool for collaboration as aa
for me. This also is valuable tool for collaboration as
colleague(s) could be invited to watch the video with or without
colleague(s) could be invited to watch the video with or without
me and to provide their thoughts and feedback based on their
me and to provide their thoughts and feedback based on their
observations.
observations.
Findings: Teacher Candidate Vision of
What it Means to Teach
• Teach each student for understanding
• Form relationships and build learning communities with
students and with colleagues
• Become a reflective practitioner as an individual and
with others
• Collaborate with a common focus on student learning
Next Steps
• Deepen partnership
o Guest and main placements take advantage of
existing pairings within the building
o Mentor teachers and faculty coordinate fieldbased assignments
o Increase access to tools that support examination
of student thinking/reasoning
Next Steps
• Communicate potential power of this model at
secondary level
o Multiple sections of the same course natural site
for coplanning, coteaching, and debriefing
Next Steps
• View collaboration as a co-inquiry where we cross
typical boundaries in the interest of learning across
the partnership.
o Faculty join triad for collaborative lesson study
(planning-observation-debrief cycles)
o Faculty “guest teach” in K-8 classrooms
o Mentor teachers “guest teach” in GTEP courses
How can we learn to work closely with our professional peers, to
How can we learn to work closely with our professional peers, to
seek help and advice, to not only learn from, but to actively seek
seek help and advice, to not only learn from, but to actively seek
critical feedback if we never experience this kind of environment
critical feedback if we never experience this kind of environment
during our teacher training? By learning with and from one
during our teacher training? By learning with and from one
another we build the kind of community in which we learn
another we build the kind of community in which we learn
deeper and grow stronger in our abilities as teachers. Most
deeper and grow stronger in our abilities as teachers. Most
importantly we build aa support system in which we can feel safe
importantly we build support system in which we can feel safe
to take risks, to learn from both our successes and our failures.
to take risks, to learn from both our successes and our failures.
The result is that the novices leave this program equipped for the
The result is that the novices leave this program equipped for the
kind of team work and collaboration that is the model in many
kind of team work and collaboration that is the model in many
schools/districts and prepared to help build this model in those
schools/districts and prepared to help build this model in those
places where it does not exist. Yes, novices can and should learn
places where it does not exist. Yes, novices can and should learn
not only from, but with other novices, thereby improving the
not only from, but with other novices, thereby improving the
teaching and learning for teachers and students alike.
teaching and learning for teachers and students alike.
Questions?

Nicole Miller Rigelman – rigelman@pdx.edu
Barbara Ruben – rubenb@pdx.edu
Lesson Planning Cycle
Developing Lasting Visions of Effective Teaching

Developing Lasting Visions of Effective Teaching

  • 1.
    Developing Lasting Visionsof Effective Teaching: Professional Learning Communities Supporting Learning Across the Professional Continuum Nicole Miller Rigelman and Barbara Ruben Portland State University March 4, 2011
  • 2.
    Session Overview • ProblemStatement • Conceptual Framework o Partnership Learning Triangle o Professional Learning Design Principles • • • • Research Questions Context, Data Collection, and Analysis Findings and Next Steps Questions and Discussion
  • 3.
    Characteristics of Partner Schools •Shared vision of effective teaching and learning. • Structures that support collaborative professional learning. • Recognition of the reciprocal benefits of partnerships between the university and school.
  • 5.
    Design Principles 1. Establishprofessional learning communities. 2. Connect theory and practice. 3. Elicit student thinking to further learning.
  • 6.
    Research Questions In whatways does collaborative professional learning in a university/school partnership, focused on deepening student thinking and reasoning, o influence the learning of K-8 students, teacher candidates, mentor teachers, principals, and university faculty; and o support the development of the teacher candidates’ vision of what it means to be a teacher (e.g., seek opportunities to deprivatize their practice and refine their teaching in collaboration with others and with a focus on student thinking).
  • 7.
    Cohort Structure • Workedin partnership with two schools. • Clustered 23 student teachers (n1=9 and n2=14). • Used primarily a triad model for field placement, forming classroom-based PLCs. • Utilized site-based and university-based supervisors. • Managed dual authorization levels through main and “guest” placement.
  • 8.
    Learning Context • Engagedin collaborative lesson planning cycles (school and classroom). • Teacher candidates completed field-based assignments and reflective writing and dialogue. • Established cohort-wide PLC and cohort-based PLCs (i.e., Critical Friends Groups).
  • 9.
    School-based School-based Professional Learning Professional Learning Community Community School-based School-based ProfessionalLearning Professional Learning Community Community ClassroomClassroombased based Professional Professional Learning Learning Community Community ClassroomClassroombased based Professional Professional Learning Learning Community Community ClassroomClassroombased based Professional Professional Learning Learning Community Community ClassroomClassroombased based Professional Professional Learning Learning Community Community Cohort Professional Cohort Professional Learning Community Learning Community CF CF G G CF CF G G CF CF G G CF CF G G
  • 12.
    Collaborative Professional Learning • FormativeAssessment/Collaborative Examination of Student Work • Collaborative Lesson Planning through Tuning Protocol • Debrief a collaboratively planned lesson using a process similar to “video club” (c.f. Sherin, Linsenmeier, & van Es, 2006) The purpose across these sessions was to provide teams with protocols and tools to support their ongoing collaboration.
  • 13.
    Data Sources –Teacher Candidates • Individual written reflections (quarterly) o summative reflection focused on collaboration o log reflections focused on connecting field- and course-based learning o consultancy group reflections • Focus group interviews (March and June) • Observations of the work within the various PLCs (ongoing)
  • 14.
    Data Sources Mentor Teachers •Focus group interviews (March and June) • Observations of the work within the various PLCs (ongoing) Principal and Supervisors • Ongoing conversations • Interview (June)
  • 15.
    Findings: K-8 StudentLearning We’re able to give each other We’re able to give each other aa lot of ideas about how to lot of ideas about how to take scripted lesson from the take scripted lesson from the curriculum and add our own curriculum and add our own spin on them to make more spin on them to make more meaningful for students. meaningful for students. [The students learned] [The students learned] flexibility. [They had] aa lot flexibility. [They had] lot more individual attention, more individual attention, small group attention, ... small group attention, ... writing feedback, many writing feedback, many adults caring about them. adults caring about them. Lower students get Lower students get help, higher students help, higher students get challenge – good get challenge – good model for model for differentiated differentiated instruction. instruction.
  • 16.
    Findings: K-8 StudentLearning Teacher candidates, mentor teachers, and principals alike agreed that o K-8 student learning opportunities were enhanced through this collaboration. o increasing the number of adults in the classroom brought multiple perspectives to the teaching and learning process allowing adaptations and enhancements to lessons, differentiation, and attention to individual student learning. o multiple adults in the classroom had a positive impact on relationships with students.
  • 17.
    Findings: Teacher Candidate Learning IIthinkthat my favorite part is when we talk think that my favorite part is when we talk after teaching. We try to talk after every class after teaching. We try to talk after every class to debrief pedagogical moves. It doesn’t to debrief pedagogical moves. It doesn’t matter who teaches the lesson, we talk about matter who teaches the lesson, we talk about what went on in the classroom, students’ what went on in the classroom, students’ discussions, a-ha moments, or hurdles. discussions, a-ha moments, or hurdles. As aastudent myself, IIhave spent the past year As student myself, have spent the past year studying about collaboration, meaningful learning, studying about collaboration, meaningful learning, and best practice, but IIdon’t think those things and best practice, but don’t think those things really sunk in until IIhad the chance to use them in really sunk in until had the chance to use them in my classroom every single day, and genuinely my classroom every single day, and genuinely understand what it was like to work with other understand what it was like to work with other people to make everything IIwas teaching relevant people to make everything was teaching relevant and meaningful to each one of my students. and meaningful to each one of my students.
  • 18.
    Findings: Teacher Candidate Learning Inmath class, we have been learning about an inquiry-based In math class, we have been learning about an inquiry-based curriculum and how to really allow students to own their curriculum and how to really allow students to own their thinking. Through completing assignments such as Inquiring thinking. Through completing assignments such as Inquiring to Understand and the Math Talks, IIhave been able to to Understand and the Math Talks, have been able to incorporate some of this in the classroom. This not only incorporate some of this in the classroom. This not only has shown me what an inquiry-based classroom might look has shown me what an inquiry-based classroom might look like, but has given me the chance to understand how my like, but has given me the chance to understand how my students think in math, which will only help in future students think in math, which will only help in future instruction. Our language arts class has also given me the instruction. Our language arts class has also given me the opportunity to understand student thinking through opportunity to understand student thinking through conducting reading and writing conferences. Assignments conducting reading and writing conferences. Assignments such as these really taught me that the more you know such as these really taught me that the more you know about your students, the more effective you will be when about your students, the more effective you will be when teaching lessons teaching lessons
  • 19.
    Findings: Teacher Candidate Learning Perhapsthe biggest effect of this collaborative Perhaps the biggest effect of this collaborative model is that what effects one of us effects model is that what effects one of us effects the rest of us. If we see someone’s success the rest of us. If we see someone’s success we learn from them. If we see someone fail we learn from them. If we see someone fail we learn from them too. The more people we learn from them too. The more people that are in the mix, the more potential that are in the mix, the more potential learning experiences arise. This allow us twice learning experiences arise. This allow us twice the experience in the same amount of time. the experience in the same amount of time.
  • 20.
    Findings: Teacher Candidate Learning Teachercandidates stated that o collaboration was central to their learning. o by deprivatizing their practice, they learned through their collective successes and failures. o it was when they were able to implement the learning from their courses in the field that they really learned. o the field based assignments required them implement strategies in their classrooms that allowed deep examination of student thinking.
  • 21.
    Findings: Teacher Candidate Learningthrough Collaborative Professional Learning • Teacher candidates described ways that their mentor’s instructional practice was influenced by… o thinking more deeply about actions/decisions and s/he had to articulate reasoning, and o a willingness to tweak scripted curriculum and implement innovations due to the extra eyes, ears, hands…
  • 22.
    Findings: Mentor Teacher Learning Themost common learnings that mentor teachers identified were o increased flexibility and o enhanced communication skills. Both improved their abilities as a mentor.
  • 23.
    Findings: Mentor Teacher Learning Withregard to their teaching, mentor teachers o acknowledged alternative approaches to reaching students, and o increased their use of technology.
  • 24.
    Findings: Mentor Teaching Learningthrough Collaborative Professional Learning Mentor teachers in focus groups with their peers did not articulate much learning… An explanation, offered by each principal independently, was mentor teachers may not want to claim learning in front of colleagues/principal.
  • 25.
    Findings: Principal Learning •Clustering student teachers from only one university allows consistent communication and expectations. • Mentor teachers need choice in selection and number of teacher candidates to determine “fit.” • Field-based assignments should be coordinated with mentor teachers (i.e., communicate purpose, timing, results). • Set parameters for individual versus collaborative mentoring so that the time is not a burden.
  • 26.
    Findings: Teacher CandidateVision of What it Means to Teach Throughout this term, IIhave come to Throughout this term, have come to realize that it is my responsibility as aa realize that it is my responsibility as teacher to adjust and develop curriculum teacher to adjust and develop curriculum that is accessible to every single one of my that is accessible to every single one of my students. Although this sounds somewhat students. Although this sounds somewhat idealistic, being in the classroom every day idealistic, being in the classroom every day has made me see that it is not only totally has made me see that it is not only totally possible --it is also totally necessary possible it is also totally necessary Because IIam so used Because am so used to collaboration, IIam to collaboration, am sure IIwill seek it out sure will seek it out and try to incorporate and try to incorporate it into my future it into my future teaching teaching This is what IIneed in This is what need in my teaching community, my teaching community, all of us working hard all of us working hard to accomplish goals for to accomplish goals for our students, the school our students, the school and supporting each and supporting each other. other.
  • 27.
    Findings: Teacher CandidateVision of What it Means to Teach [Videorecording] provided an invaluable opportunity to not only [Videorecording] provided an invaluable opportunity to not only look at our own teaching, but also to see and hear the interactions look at our own teaching, but also to see and hear the interactions of the students as they engaged with each other. This is an of the students as they engaged with each other. This is an important experience that I Iwill take with me into my own important experience that will take with me into my own classroom. A teacher cannot see and hear all and though much can classroom. A teacher cannot see and hear all and though much can be inferred by our informal observations of groups at work and be inferred by our informal observations of groups at work and our evaluations and observations of student work and on our evaluations and observations of student work and on assessments, video provides aatool to see students behavior when assessments, video provides tool to see students behavior when the teacher isn’t next to them and to gain insight into their the teacher isn’t next to them and to gain insight into their interactions, their teamwork and communication, and their interactions, their teamwork and communication, and their understanding based on aamuch longer period of time. This seems understanding based on much longer period of time. This seems especially important with aateacher working alone in aaroom. There especially important with teacher working alone in room. There is no way that I Iwould be able to pull away from my teaching is no way that would be able to pull away from my teaching responsibilities within aalesson to just watch and listen to aagroup responsibilities within lesson to just watch and listen to group for 10 or more minutes, but aavideo camera can be that observer for 10 or more minutes, but video camera can be that observer for me. This also is aavaluable tool for collaboration as aa for me. This also is valuable tool for collaboration as colleague(s) could be invited to watch the video with or without colleague(s) could be invited to watch the video with or without me and to provide their thoughts and feedback based on their me and to provide their thoughts and feedback based on their observations. observations.
  • 28.
    Findings: Teacher CandidateVision of What it Means to Teach • Teach each student for understanding • Form relationships and build learning communities with students and with colleagues • Become a reflective practitioner as an individual and with others • Collaborate with a common focus on student learning
  • 29.
    Next Steps • Deepenpartnership o Guest and main placements take advantage of existing pairings within the building o Mentor teachers and faculty coordinate fieldbased assignments o Increase access to tools that support examination of student thinking/reasoning
  • 30.
    Next Steps • Communicatepotential power of this model at secondary level o Multiple sections of the same course natural site for coplanning, coteaching, and debriefing
  • 31.
    Next Steps • Viewcollaboration as a co-inquiry where we cross typical boundaries in the interest of learning across the partnership. o Faculty join triad for collaborative lesson study (planning-observation-debrief cycles) o Faculty “guest teach” in K-8 classrooms o Mentor teachers “guest teach” in GTEP courses
  • 32.
    How can welearn to work closely with our professional peers, to How can we learn to work closely with our professional peers, to seek help and advice, to not only learn from, but to actively seek seek help and advice, to not only learn from, but to actively seek critical feedback if we never experience this kind of environment critical feedback if we never experience this kind of environment during our teacher training? By learning with and from one during our teacher training? By learning with and from one another we build the kind of community in which we learn another we build the kind of community in which we learn deeper and grow stronger in our abilities as teachers. Most deeper and grow stronger in our abilities as teachers. Most importantly we build aa support system in which we can feel safe importantly we build support system in which we can feel safe to take risks, to learn from both our successes and our failures. to take risks, to learn from both our successes and our failures. The result is that the novices leave this program equipped for the The result is that the novices leave this program equipped for the kind of team work and collaboration that is the model in many kind of team work and collaboration that is the model in many schools/districts and prepared to help build this model in those schools/districts and prepared to help build this model in those places where it does not exist. Yes, novices can and should learn places where it does not exist. Yes, novices can and should learn not only from, but with other novices, thereby improving the not only from, but with other novices, thereby improving the teaching and learning for teachers and students alike. teaching and learning for teachers and students alike.
  • 33.
  • 34.

Editor's Notes

  • #5 Learning for ALL participants in the project Influence ways in which interns view teaching… site for collaborative inquiry “learning, thinking, and knowing are relations among people engaged in activity in, with, and arising from the socially and culturally structured world” (Lave, 1991, p. 67) view teachers’ collective inquiry within schools and within their classrooms as forming overlapping communities of practice (Wenger, 1998)
  • #8 Improving student learning by carefully examining student thinking and the teaching and learning process
  • #9 Improving student learning by carefully examining student thinking and the teaching and learning process
  • #10 Nested learning communities across the partnership
  • #11 Learning for ALL participants in the project Influence ways in which interns view teaching… site for collaborative inquiry “learning, thinking, and knowing are relations among people engaged in activity in, with, and arising from the socially and culturally structured world” (Lave, 1991, p. 67) view teachers’ collective inquiry within schools and within their classrooms as forming overlapping communities of practice (Wenger, 1998)
  • #26 Schools also need a choice in how to engender the collaboration among teacher candidates and mentor teachers. Offer examples from this year’s cohort (paired dyads and triads among teams)
  • #29 Influence on teacher candidate’s vision of what it means to teach as a result of this focus on collaboration
  • #32 Ken Zeichner, 2010 7/8 grade math at Winterhaven 2nd grade Number of the Day at Winterhaven 5th grade implementation of new curriculum at Jason Lee
  • #36 Carefully constructed field experiences coordinated with campus courses are more influential and effective in supporting intern learning… I would also argue there is a potentially to positively influence student learning and mentor learning (Darling-Hammond, 2006; Tatto, 1996) Advantage for Barb and I is that we are serving as both the instructors and the field supervisors