Distance Algorithm for Transmission Line with Mid-Point Connected STATCOM

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July-2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1000
Distance algorithm for Transmission Line with Mid-Point Connected
STATCOM
Jyoti Verma1, Reshmita Sharma2
1M. Tech Scholar, Department of EE, SSTC & SSGI, JUNWANI, BHILAI, 490020 (C. G.), INDIA
2Assistant Professor, Department of EEE, SSTC & SSGI, JUNWANI, BHILAI, 490020 (C. G.), INDIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - This paper presents an adaptive zone selection
algorithm for the transmission line with midpoint connected
STATCOM. The objective of this paper is to investigate the
performance of transmission line distance protection with
shunt connected FACT device (STATCOM). The impact of
STATCOM on distance protection is investigated for different
types of fault, different fault resistances and load angles. The
studied power system and STATCOM with their associate
elements and controllers are modelled using EMTDC/PSCAD
software. Numerous number of fault scenarios are simulated
and the strength of the proposedadaptivezonesettingmethod
is verified.
Key Words: Flexible ac transmission system (FACTS),
Power system protection, distance relay, midpoint static
synchronous compensator (STATCOM), adaptive zone.
1. INTRODUCTION
The use of FACTS controllers increases the power transfer
capability, improves the voltage stability, enhances the
transientstabilityanddampsthesub-synchronousoscillation
[1-4]. FACTS devices enhances the power transfer capability
by fully utilizing the existing transmission assets. Theimpact
of FACTS controllers on transmission system is significantas
they consist of high speed switching device that can handle
power of megawatt level and modern control schemes.
Among the various FACTS controllers, Static Synchronous
Compensators (STATCOMs) are device that support the
reactive power at the point of the connection to maintain the
voltage profile and boost up the power transfer capability.
This study investigates the challenges to distance protection
of transmission line equipped with STATCOM.
In this work a 230 kV-50 Hz, three phase power system as
shown in Fig. 1. The instrument transformers are connected
at bus M. The current transformer (CT) and CCVT are having
ratios of 1000:1 A and 230 kV: 115 V respectively. The line
between bus M and N is 300 km. Distributed parameter line
model is considered. The sampling rate is maintained at 1
kHz. The systemissimulatedinEMTDC/PSCADenvironment.
2. Modelling of 100 MVA, 12 pulse STATCOM
2.1 STATCOM controller model
The single line diagram of 100 MVA, 12 pulse voltage source
converter (VSC) based STATCOM connected to the
transmissionlineisshowninfig.1.STATCOMgeneratesthree
phase controllable voltage output similar to system
frequency. The dc input to the STATCOM is provided by the
capacitor. The function of the couplingcapacitoristoconnect
the ac power system with the STATCOM at point of the
connection. The reactive and real power flow exchange
between the ac system and STATCOM can be varied just by
varying the output of the converter. The STATCOM midpoint
reference voltage and its characteristic slopeare set to 1 p. u.
and 3% respectively.
A pulse width modulation (PWM) control scheme is adopted
in this study to generate balanced three phase firing signals
i.e. all the three phases signals are 1200 apart from each
other.
2.2 STATCOM voltage controller model
The STATCOM voltage controller regulates transmissionline
voltage at the point of connection by injecting or absorbing
the reactive power. The schematic block diagram of the
STATCOM controller is shown in the fig. 3. The voltage
controller consists of positive sequence component block,
quadrature current block, PI controllers and phase locked
loop (PLL) block. The positive sequence of the midpoint
Fig. 2. Basic Structure of STATCOM
Voltage
Source
Converter
Bus Voltage (V)
Coupling
Transformer
Vdc
Q
Fig.1. Power system model with
midpoint STATCOM
~
~
~
~
Transformer
STATCOM
S1
M P N
S2

voltage using the three phasevoltageiscomputedbypositive
sequence component block, this measured voltage (Vmes) is
compared withthereferencevoltage(Vref)toproducedesired
change in the voltagesimplycallederrorvoltage(Verror).Now,
the erroneous voltage signal is fed to a proportional integral
controller-1 (PI-1) whose function is to regulate the voltage
and produces the change in angle between the reference and
measured voltage. However, this can be achieved by two sub
processes. The output of the PI controller-1 produces the
reference quadrature current (Iqref) which is compared with
the measured quadrature current (Iqmes) produced by the
quadraturecurrent computation block. The error of both the
current (Iqerror) again fed to PI controller-2 to produce the
desired phase shift (α). The error in α indicates the variation
of the DC capacitor voltage in order to vary the reactive
power between converter and ac power system. A step
response voltage signal is used to tune the PI controllers in
order to produce the desire outputs.
3. Apparent Impedance CalculationWithSTATCOM
In thissegment mathematical representationoftheapparent
impedance seen by the relay in presence of the midpoint
connected STATCOM is formulated. The equivalent network
of system shown in fig. 1. is represented in fig. 4.
where,
Vs1, Vs2 = Equivalent voltages of two source S1and S2
Zs1, Zs2 = Equivalent source impedances of two source S1and
S2
Is1, Is2 = Currents from two source S1and S2 end
rf = Fault resistance in ohm
if = Fault current in ampere
Xsh = Equivalent reactance of STATCOM
Ish = STATCOM injected current in ampere
VF = Fault voltage
k = Fault location in percentage (%)
Zl = Transmission line impedance in ohm
1, 2 = Source end buses
V1, V2 = Source end bus voltages
Zapp = Zr= Apparent or relay impedance seen by the relay at
the point of connection
The mathematical representation of the impedance seen by
the relay following to a single line to ground (SLG) and three
phase fault is shown below
3.1 Single Line to Ground Fault (SLG)
Fault occurs beyond the STATCOM (k ≥ 50%), the voltage
seen by the relay can be formulated as (1)
   012 x x x x x
1 s1 sh s1 F FV =0.5Z I + Κ-0.5 Z I +I +il l r (1)
where,
x; suffix represents the sequence component
V1 = Voltage at relay point
Zl = Transmission line impedance
Is1 = relay current
Ish = STATCOM injected current
If = fault current
rf = fault resistance
The apparent impedance of relay is given by (2)
r 1
r
r 1
V V
Ζ = =
I I
(2)
By simply adding the three sequence components of
corresponding voltage and current signals, the relay voltage
and current (Vr and Ir) is given by (3)
   1 0 1 0
L s1 s sh f fshV =kZ I +kI + Κ-0.5 Z I +mI +ir l r 
  
(3)
where,
s1 s2 shi =I +I +If represents the total fault current
0 1
1
Z -Z
m=
Z
ll
l
= compensation factor
In this work, the relay is connected at bus ‘1’, positive and
negative sequence impedances are assumed to be equal. In
eqn. (2) the relay current is calculated as Ir = Is1+kIs1
0. The
relay impedance is shown in (4)
Il1
rfXsh
0.5Zl (K-0.5)Zl (1-k)Zl
Vs1 Vs2V1
Zs1 Zs2
V2
STATCOM
VF
VP
S2 ~S1~
Fig. 4. Equivalent faulted circuit
Fig. 3. STATCOM controller
Vmes.
Verror
Iqerror
Iqmes
.
α+ +
+
+
- -
θ
Reference
Voltage
(Vref)
PI
Controlle
r2
Calculation of
Positive Sequence
Component of
Voltage Signal
Compute
Quadrature
Current
Phase
Locked
Loop
PI
Controller
1
∑
∑
∑

0
sh1 1 sh
r F
relay relay
I +kI
Z =kZ +(k-0.5)Z +R
I I
f
l l
i   
   
     
(4)
Where Ish0 is the zero sequence component of current
injected by the STATCOM. But, its effect is not considered to
be significant as one side of the coupling transformer is delta
connectedand can be neglected. So, eqn (4) can be writtenas
 1 1 sh
app. r F
relay relay
I
Z =Z =kZ + k-0.5 Z +r
I I
f
l l
i   
   
   
   
(5)
3.2 Three Phase Fault
Following a three phase fault at k ≥ 50% of the transmission
line, the apparent impedance seen by the relay can derived
and finally given in (6)
 1 1 sh
app. r F
s1 s1
I
Z =Z =kZ + k-0.5 Z +r
I I
f
l l
i  
    
   
(6)
4. PROPOSED ADAPTIVE METHOD
Distance relay issues trip signal based on the comparison of
setting impedanceandapparentimpedancevalues.Innormal
operating condition both the impedances are equal.
Considering the setting impedance value to be 85% of line,
the apparent impedance can be written as:
1
app. r lZ =Z =0.85Z (7)
Comparing eqs. (6) and (7)
 1 1 sh
app. r
r
I
Z =Z =kZ + k-0.5 Z
I
l l
 
 
 
(8)
Solving eq. (8), final equation for new setting zoneisgivenby
1
n
0.35
Z =0.5+Z
1+
l

 
 
 
(9)
where,
comp sh
r
Z I
= =
Z Il

   
    
  
= compensation factor (10)
Ish = current injected by STATCOM, Irelay = relay current at
bus M, Zcomp = compensated impedance and Zl =transmission
line impedance.
5. PERFORMANCE OF THE PROPOSED TECHNIQUE
5.1. Single Line to Ground (SLG) Fault
5.1.1. During Underreach
Underreach occurs due to capacitive mode operation of
STATCOM as a result of which the net impedance seen by the
relay increases. Therefore,theconventionalrelaydoesn’ttrip
for a fault near the boundary of zone 1. Fig. 5(a) shows
impedance trajectoryforsystemwithandwithoutSTATCOM.
Conventional relays for the transmission line without
STATCOM operates correctly and with STATCOM it
maloperates. However, with new adaptive zone setting this
maloperation can be prevented. Single line to ground fault is
createdat remoteend (255 km) of the transmissionlinewith
STATCOM connected at the midpoint.
5.1.1.1. Performance for different fault locations
Faults occurring at the boundary of zone 1 hinders the
performance of the relay. However, for an in-zone fault the
relay should operate correctly with adaptive zone setting.
Single line to ground fault is created at 255 km from relay
location with fault resistanceof 1Ω and load angle of 200.The
corresponding results with and without STATCOM is shown
in Fig. 5(b).
5.1.1.2. Performance for different fault resistance
In this section performance of the proposed method is
analyzed for different fault resistance values. Single line to
ground fault is created near the zone 1 reach. Fig. 5(c) shows
the impedance trajectory with and without STATCOM. The
fault resistance and load angle is set to 30Ω and 300
respectively.
5.1.1.3. Performance for different load angle
To investigate the impact of variation in load angle and
performance of proposed method during such system
condition, singleline to ground fault iscreated at remoteend
of the transmissionline. In this sectionloadangleof500 anda
low fault resistance of Rf =0.01Ω is considered. From this
analysis it has been found that increasing the load angle of
the system the relay calculated impedance is increased. The
corresponding result is shown in Fig. 5(d).
5.1.2. During Overreach
Overreach occurs when the STATCOM is operated in
inductive mode. The primary causes are when STATCOM
compensates a weak systemand the reference voltage is less
than 1 p. u. To observe the relay overreach condition
reference voltage of 0.85 p. u. is considered. Single line to
ground fault is created a remote end (260 km) of the
transmission line with midpoint connected STATCOM and
proposed adaptive method is applied with different power
system scenarios to mitigate the condition of overreach.
Relay measured impedance without STATCOM is correct
while with STATCOM for an out of section fault the
impedance trajectory enters into the Zone-1.
However, proposed technique evaluates the new zone for
which the relay operation is accurate. The corresponding
result is shown in Fig. 6(a).
5.1.2.1. Performance for different fault locations
To examine the performance of the proposed adaptive
method a singleline to ground faultiscreatedat200kmfrom
the relay location. The case is simulated with fault resistance
Rf = 1Ω and load angle of 300. The proposed algorithm not
only operates correctly for out of section faults but also
operate correctly for an in-zone fault. The corresponding
result is shown in Fig. 6(b).

5.1.2.2. Performance for different fault resistance
The performance of proposed algorithm is evaluated for
different fault resistances. Single line to ground fault is
createdat remoteend of the transmissionline(beyondZone-
1) with a high fault resistance of Rf = 30Ω and load angle of
300. Fig. 6(c) shows the impedance seen by relay with
conventional zone-1 setting, which leads to maloperation.
However, operation of the relay is correct with proposed
adaptive zone.
5.1.2.3. Performance for different load angle
To investigate the impact of variation in load angle and
performance of proposed method during such system
condition, singleline to ground fault iscreated at remoteend
of the transmissionline. In this sectionloadangleof500 anda
low fault resistance of Rf =0.01Ω is considered. Henceforth,it
has been found that by increasing the load angle of system
the relay calculated impedance also increases. The
corresponding result is shown in Fig. 6(d).
5.2. Line to Line (LL) Fault
Performance of proposed adaptive zone based distance
algorithm is evaluated for several line to line fault scenarios,
assuming the capacitive mode operation of the STATCOM.
Line to Line faults (phase A to Phase B) are created at
distance 255 km (boundary of the zone1 reach), considering
variations in fault resistance (0.01 Ω to 30 Ω).
The proposed adaptive relay is also tested during the
variation of load angle (100 to 500). The corresponding
results with variousfaultresistanceandloadangleareshown
in Fig.6. It is observed that the conventional distance relay
doesn’t operate correctly with mid-point connected
STATCOM whereas proposed adaptive zone based distance
relay correctly operates.
During the STATCOM infeed, LL fault at the boundary of the
zone 1 leads to maloperation of distance relay (underreach
effect). However, proposed algorithm computes a new
adaptive zone for which relay operation is correct, shown in
Fig. 7(a). Fig. 7(b) shows the accuracy of the proposed
method for an in-zone fault (at 200 km). Functionality of the
proposed method is also verified for low to high fault
Fig.5. Adaptive Mho relay for LG fault (a) load angle 200 and Rf =1 Ω, (b) load angle 100 and Rf =10 Ω, (c) load angle 300
and Rf =30 Ω, (d) load angle 500 and Rf =50 Ω
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
X(Ω)X(Ω)
X(Ω)X(Ω)
R (Ω)
R (Ω) R (Ω)
R (Ω)
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
Zone 1 setting Adaptive Zone
Adaptive Zone
Zone1 setting
Adaptive ZoneZone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting

Fig.8. Adaptive Mho relay for LL fault (a) load angle 20◦
and Rf =1 Ω, (b) load angle 10◦
and Rf =10 Ω, (c) load angle 30◦
and Rf =30 Ω, (d) load angle 50◦
and Rf =50 Ω
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
(a) R (Ω)
X(Ω)
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
(b)
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
R (Ω)
X(Ω)
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting
(d)
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
R (Ω)
X(Ω)
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
(c) R (Ω)
X(Ω)
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting
Fig.7. Adaptive Mho relay for LG fault (a) load angle 20◦
and Rf =50 Ω
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
0 10 20 30
0
5
10
15
20
-5 0 5 10 15 20
0
5
10
15
20
-5 0 5 10 15 20
0
5
10
15
20
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 settingAdaptive ZoneZone 1 setting Adaptive
Zone
R (Ω) R (Ω)
R (Ω) R (Ω)(a) (b)
(c) (d)
)
X(Ω)X(Ω)
X(Ω)X(Ω)

Fig.10. Adaptive Mho relay for LLL fault (a) load angle 20◦
and Rf =60 Ω
Fig.9. Adaptive Mho relay for LLL fault (a) load angle 20◦
and Rf =60 Ω
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
R (Ω)
R (Ω) R (Ω)
R (Ω)
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
0
5
10
15
20
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
5
10
15
20
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
Zone 1 settingAdaptive Zone
Adaptive ZoneZone 1 setting
Zone 1
setting
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
X(Ω)
R (Ω)
R (Ω)R (Ω)
R (Ω)
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
-10 0 10 20
0
5
10
15
20
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting
Adaptive Zone
Zone 1 setting

resistance of 0.01 Ω, 10 Ω and 30 Ω and for different load
angle of 100, 200 and 500 shown in Fig. 7(c) and Fig. 7(d).
To examine the performance of proposed method, Line to
Line fault (Phase A to Phase B) is created outside the zone 1
(260 km) from relay location. The STACOM is set to be
operated in an inductive mode.Foranoutofsectionfault,due
to presence of midpoint connected STATCOM the
conventional distance relay recognizes it as an in zone fault
and maloperates. However, with proposed algorithm the
relay calculates new zonesettingforwhichtherelayoperates
correctly. The corresponding result is shown in Fig. 8(a).
To validatethe efficiencyofproposedmethodvarioussystem
conditions with different fault resistances and load angle
have been simulated on power system. Fig. 8 (b) shows, the
impedance trajectory corresponding to an inzone fault (200
km from bus M) with load angle 100 and Rf =10 Ω. It can be
concluded from Fig. 8 (b) that both the distance relay
operates correctly for an inzone fault.
To study the impact of fault resistance and load angle on
midpoint connected STATCOM,LinetoLinefaultsarecreated
beyond zone 1 setting with fault resistance of 50 Ω and 30 Ω
and load angles of 300 and 500. With conventional zone 1
setting relay maloperates as the fault resistance increases.
However, proposedtechniquecomputesthenewsettingzone
for which the operation of relay is correct and reliable. The
corresponding results are shown in Fig. 8(c). Now, the load
angle and fault resistance is incremented to 500 and 50 Ω
respectively and simulated. As earlier discussed apparent
impedance increases with increase in load angle. Faults
beyond the zone 1 cause overreach and the conventional
relay maloperates. In Fig. 8(d), impedance trajectory enters
into the trip region of the conventional distance relay
characteristics even though the fault is out of zone 1 limit.
However, the operation of the conventional distance relay is
reliable when STATCOM is out of service. In ordertomitigate
this problem the proposed adaptive algorithm computes the
new setting zone.
From Fig. 8(d), it is observed that the impedance trajectory
lies outside for new setting zone. Therefore, proposed
algorithm successfully mitigates the overreach issue
associated with midpoint connected STATCOM.
5.3. Triple Line Fault (LLL)
To illustratethe performanceof proposedmethod,LLLfaults
are created at boundary of zone 1 reach (255 km). Fault
resistances are varied within the range of 0.01Ω to a higher
value of 60 Ω. Different load angles are taken into the
consideration to evaluate the strength of the proposed
technique.
It is observed that both conventional and proposed relay
operates correctly forin-zonefaults.However,faultsnearthe
boundary causes maloperation of the conventional relay for
different scenarios but, proposed method is highly reliable,
accurate in operation and is efficient in mitigating the
underreach effect. The efficiency of the proposed method as
compared to conventional relayingalgorithmisshowninFig.
9.
In this section, performance of proposed method is analyzed
for triple line (LLL) fault. LLL faults are created beyond the
zone 1 setting of the distance relay connected at bus M.
During simulation, efficiency of proposed technique and
impact of various systemparametersondistancerelayingare
investigated. Fault resistance is varied from a lower value of
0.01Ω to a higher value of 60 Ω. The load angle is varied
within the range of 100-500.
It is observed that proposed adaptive zone selection
algorithm operates correctly for all the scenarios. For an in-
zone fault (200 km) the conventional MHO relay and
proposed method operates correctly as shown in Fig. 10 (b).
On the other hand, for out of section faults the trajectory
enters into the trip region of conventional MHO relay
characteristic in presence of STATCOM. This effect remains
samefordifferent loadanglesandfaultresistances.However,
proposed method is capable of mitigating this problem with
different power system conditions.
6. CONCLUSIONS
This paper addresses the impacts of midpoint connected
STATCOM on distance protection and also reports the
limitationofconventionaldistancerelay.Thispaperproposes
a new adaptive zone selection algorithm based on the
calculation of compensating impedance. However, this
compensating impedance is calculated depending upon the
current injected or absorbed by the STATCOM. Simulation
and analysis of the proposed method is performed in
EMTDC/PSCAD environment. Proposed algorithm is tested
under different fault conditions, with wide variation in fault
resistances and load angles. Both underreach and overreach
effects are analyzed and the related issues can be mitigated
using proposed adaptive zone algorithm. From the results
and analysis it can be concluded that proposed technique is
accurate, highly reliable, robust, secureand fast in operation.
It can be installed with the conventional distance relay for
midpoint connected STATCOM and for any shunt connected
FACTS devices.
REFERENCES
[1] N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS:
Concepts & Technology of Flexible AC Transmission
Systems. New York: Wiley, 1999.
[2] E. Larsen et al., Basic aspect of applying SVCs to series-
compensated AC transmission lines, IEEE Trans. Power
Del., (5) (July) (1990) 689–686.
[3] L. Gyugyi, Converter-based FACTS Controllers, IEE
Colloquium on Flexible AC Transmission Systems - The
FACTS, 23 Nov. 1998, Pages: 1/1-111 , Ref. No.
1998/500.

[4] R. M. Mathur and R. K. Varma, Thyristor-Based FACTS
Controllers for Electrical Transmission Systems: Wiley-
IEEE Press, Feb. 2002.
[5] P. Moore and P. Ashmole, Flexible AC Transmission
Systems. II. Methods of Transmission Line
Compensation, IEE Power Engineering Journal. 10 (6)
(Dec.) (1996) 273 – 278.
[6] J. V. V. N. Bapiraju, J. U. Shenoy, K. G. Sheshadri, H. P.
Khincha, D. Thukaram, Implementation of DSP based
relaying with particular reference to effect of STATCOM
on transmission line protection,inProc.Int.Conf.Power
Syst. Technol. (2) (Nov.) (2004) 1381–1385.
[7] Amir Ghorbani, Mojtaba Khederzadeh, Babak Mozafari,
Impact of SVC on the protection of transmission lines,
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy
Systems. 42 (1) (2012) 702-709.
[8] Amir Ghorbani, An adaptive distance protectionscheme
in the presence of phase shifting transformer, Electric
Power Systems Research. (129) (2015) 170-177.
[9] Thakre, P. Mohan, Vijay S. Kale, An adaptive approach
for three zone operation of digital distance relay with
Static Var Compensator using PMU, International
Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. (77)
(2016) 327-336.
[10] X. Zhou, H. Wang, R. K. Aggarwal, P. Beaumont,
Performance evaluation of a distance relay as appliedto
a transmission system with UPFC, IEEE Trans. Power
Deliv. 21 (3) (July) (2006) 1137–1147.
[11] T. Manokaran, V. Karpagam, Performance of distance
relay estimation in transmission line with UPFC, Int. J.
Comput. Elect. Eng. 2 (1) (Feb.) (2010) 158–161.
[12] J. U. Lim, J. N. Jiang, A refined differential current
protection method in the FACTS-compensated line,
Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/PES General Meeting, pp.
1–6, Pittsburgh, PA, (July) (2008) 20–24.
[13] A. Manori, M. Tripathy M, HO. Gupta, Advance
compensated Mho relay algorithm for a transmission
system with shunt flexible AC transmission system
device, ElectricPowerCompoSyst.42(16)(2014)1802–
1810.
[14] AR. Singh, NR. Patne, VS. Kale, Adaptive distance
protection setting in presence of mid-point {STATCOM}
using synchronized measurement, Int J Electr Power
Energy Syst. 67 (2015) 252–260.
[15] K. El-Arroudi, G. Joos, D. T. McGillis, Operation of
impedance protection relays with the STATCOM, IEEE
Trans. Power Del. 17 (2) (Apr.) (2002) 381–387.
[16] F. A. Albasri, T. S. Sidhu, R. K. Varma, Performance
comparison of distance protection schemes for shunt-
FACTS compensated transmission lines, IEEE Trans.
Power Del. 22 (4) (Oct.) (2007) 2116–2125.
[17] T. S. Sidhu, R. K. Verma, P. K. Gangadharan, F. A. Albasri,
G.R. Ortiz, Performance of distance relays on shunt—
FACTS compensated transmission lines, IEEE Trans.
Power Del. 20 (3) (Jul.) (2005) 1837–1845.
[18] F. A. Albasri, T. S. Sidhu, R. K. Varma, Impact of shunt-
FACTS on distance protection of transmission lines, in
Proc. Power SystemsConf. Clemson, SC, Mar. 14–17
(2006).
[19] H. K. Alan, R. Johnston, G. D. Allen, Designconsiderations
for a fiber optic communications network for power
system, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. (1)(Jan.) (1994) 510-
518.
[20] PSCAD/EMTDC User’s Guide. Winnipeg, MB, Canada:
Manitoba HVDC Res. Ctr., 2005.
BIOGRAPHIES
Ms. Jyoti Verma was born in
Chhattisgarh, India in 1989. She
received the B.E. degree in
Electrical and Electronics
Engineering from Shri
Shankracharya Group of
Institutions, Junwani Bhilai, India
in 2011. Pursuing M.Tech.
Electrical Specialization: Power
System Engineering from SSTC &
SSGI junwani Bhilai, India.
Ms. Reshmita Sharma (B.E.
M.Tech) has 8 years teaching
experience and serving as Asst.
prof. in SSTC & SSGI junwani,
bhilai, India. She is awarded as
POSOCO power system award
(PPSA 2013) by IIT Delhi for
distinguished M.Tech project. Her
research interest area is power
system protection, Artificial neural
network, and fuzzy logic
application to transmission line
protection.

Distance Algorithm for Transmission Line with Mid-Point Connected STATCOM

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Distance Algorithm for Transmission Line with Mid-Point Connected STATCOM (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Distance Algorithm for Transmission Line with Mid-Point Connected STATCOM