Reviewing Industrial Extension
Whenwe review industrial extension core process in
terms of provision of office performance result dominated
it illegally. Which means they didn’t learnt from past
mistakes as a whole. “Getting something wrong is not a
crime. Failing to learn from past mistakes because you
are not monitoring and evaluating is.” this is our office
problem they almost always attack enthusiastic worker
rather than giving lesson to reluctant. Although you have
evidence what you accomplished your works successfully,
almost always give to efficient workers deaf ear. Are the
above criteria being based on the review executives
scheduled on experts’ at one office? Or do they blindly
rendering workers' by friend / tenderness group thought,
receiving best result without doing tangible evidence /
achievements in order to create chip popularity? Whether
by knowingly, voting, racial, village thinking, paranoid/
hostility, personal or to get group benefit, etc. which all
are illegal and opposing code of conduct? Which means
2.
make sure thatwhether or not they use discriminatory,
dishonest, corrupt, using legal authority,
accountability/responsibility for personal benefit? How is
the status of the work organs doing the job?) Yes,
whether or not this is what the office profiles are describe
it?