EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT
Incorporating Risks and integrated
Master-EVM models
Muhammad Iftikhar Anjum
“You cannot manage what you
cannot measure…and what
gets measured gets done.”
Bill Hewlett,
Co-founder Hewlett Packard
INTRODUCTION
 Earned Value Management (EVM) is an effective
tool for project performance measurement on
Time, Cost & Scope baselines
 If used properly, EVM can ensure project success
without major delays
 EVM models are mainly effective for Predictive Life
Cycle Projects
 Certain limitations are associated with use of EVM,
for which different extensions have been proposed
by various researchers
INTRODUCTION
In this Study
 EVM models (Task-EVM) for each task is proposed
that are to be integrated for Project or Master-EVM
 Risk Costs and Time Buffers are added in Planned
Value (PV) calculations based on probability-impact
factors for Risk
 In order to apply the proposed EVM extensions, a
hypothetical tourism facility project is taken as a
model
AIM OF STUDY
Aim of the study is to propose techniques for
addressing EVM model limitations based on a
Hypothetical Tourism Facility Project
BASIC CONCEPTS - EVM
PV: Planned Value
EV: Earned Value
AC: Actual Cost
SV: Schedule
Variance
SV = EV – PV
CV: Cost Variance
CV = EV – AC
Cost
TimeTime t
PV
EV
AC
Schedule
Variance
Management Reserve
Cost
Variance
COST & SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE INDICES
Excellent
Bad
Cost Performance Index
CPI = EV/AC
Schedule Performance Index
SPI = EV/PV
1 or 100%
CPI, SPI = 1, Cost & Schedule are as planned
BASIC CONCEPTS - EVM
Cost
TimeTime t
PV
EV
AC
Schedule
Variance
Management Reserve
Cost
Variance
BAC
EAC
LIMITATIONS OF EVM
 Risks are not accounted for in EVM model
 Exact measurement of Earned Value (Physical
work completed) may not be accurate
 There may be variations in Cumulative Earned
Value and Physical work done on individual tasks
HYPOTHETICAL MODEL
Vash-Rung Makran
Tourism Facility Project
HYPOTHETICAL MODEL FOR RESEARCH
 A Tourism Business Company planned for establishing a
tourism facility at Kund Malir, Balochistan
 Tourism attractions include, Beach, Landscape, Hangol
River, Nani mandar, graves of Bin Qasim’s soldiers,
Princes of Hope, Star-sighting etc
 Project is named as Vash-Rung Makran (VRM)
 Company believes in use of sustainable energy, clean
environment and use of local human resource
TASKS
Task Time (weeks) Cost (million of rupees)
Hotel Renovation 13 13
Security 12 10
Training 26 10
Patrol Pump 12 20
Shuttle Service 12 40
Wind-Solar Energy System 20 40
Marketing 26 20
Hospital 12 10
Seawater Treatment 24 40
Sewerage Treatment 24 20
Trial Trip 1 1
Plan for Expansion 1 1
Total 50 (based on PERT) 225
Project Vash Rung
PERT/CPM FOR THE MODEL
PROPOSED EVM
MODELS
to address the limitations
TASK-EVMS INTO MASTER-EVM MODEL
 In order to get the real time data of AC and EV a
separate EVM for each task is to be planned and
maintained
 Task manager, with assistance of accounting/
stores professionals should keep his Task-EVM
updated
 Data for each Task-EVM is to be communicated to
Master-EVM, by a network or data link
 Periodicity of update of EVM is to be planned and
same is to be used for keeping every concerned
onboard of actual project performance
EXAMPLE
At time t, there are 3 parallel tasks A, B & C
Cumulative Calculations for Master-EVM
EVP = EVA + EVB + EVC
ACP = ACA + ACB + ACC + Ο
Ο is other associated costs, that does not add to the
Physical Work done in terms of cost
TASK & MASTER EVM
*Calculations were made from POM-QM software PERT cost-budgeting module
INCORPORATION OF RISK FACTORS
 Project Risk Management is a factor that assures a
project performance and completion as per
schedule
 PMs usually avoid maintaining a Risk Register
 A conflict situation may occur or project
performance may be affected badly, if risk
management is not done properly
 In order to avoid this situation, it is proposed that
risks are to be added to EVM planned value (PV)
INCORPORATION OF RISK FACTORS
0.36 here is Probability-Impact Factor
INCORPORATION OF RISK FACTORS
 All other Risks can be converted in terms of Cost
and Schedule
 In the model, only Cost & Schedule risks are
proposed for incorporation into EVM
 For calculation of risk values, Probability-Impact
factor (PI) is used in proposed EVM model
SCHEDULE RISKS
 It is proposed that for schedule risks, buffer times
are to be added to all tasks
 Calculations of buffer times are on the basis of PI
factors for proposed model
PIp: Probability-Impact factor (positive risks)
RVp : Risk Value (positive risks) RVp
PIn : Probability-Impact factor (negative risks)
RVn : Risk Value (negative risks)
TB: Time Buffer
Equation for Buffer Time:
TB = (PIn)*(RVn) – (PIp)*(RVp)
SCHEDULE RISKS - CALCULATIONS
 Following table, taking hypothetical values of risks,
in 4 tasks was created
RV, PS, PR in weeks
Petrol
Pump
Energy
Plant
Seawater
Plant
Sewerage
Plant
PIp 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7
RVp 1 1 2 1
(PIn)*(RVn) 0.4 0.2 0.86 0.7
PIn 0.68 0.74 0.7 0.9
RVn 5 7 3 4
(PIp)*(RVp) 3.4 5.2 2.6 3.7
Time Buffer 3 5 4 3
Planned Schedule 12 20 24 24
Planned Schedule with Risks 15 25 28 27
SCHEDULE RISKS – PERT/CPM
SCHEDULE RISKS – EVM
COST RISKS
 It is proposed that for cost risks, additional cost,
based on PI factor is to be added to tasks
PIp: Probability-Impact factor (positive risks)
RVp : Risk Value (positive risks) RVp
PIn : Probability-Impact factor (negative risks)
RVn : Risk Value (negative risks)
RC: Risk Cost (in million of rupees)
Equation for Risk Cost:
RC = (PIn)*(RVn) – (PIp)*(RVp)
COST RISKS - CALCULATIONS
 Following table, taking hypothetical values of risks,
in 4 tasks was created
RV, PB, PR in million of Rupees Training
Shuttle
Service Marketing
Sewerage
Plant
PIp 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7
RVp 1 1 2 1
(PIn)*(RVn) 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7
PIn 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9
RVn 2 2 3 2
(PIp)*(RVp) 1.4 1.2 2.1 1.8
Risk Costs 1 1 1.5 1.1
Planned Cost 12 20 24 24
Planned Cost with Risks 13 21 25.5 25.1
COST RISKS – EVM
EVM WITH ALL RISKS
IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY
 In practical approach, some risks cannot be quantified and are
based on previous experience and expert judgment of PM.
 There are Force Majeure Risks, like natural disasters, those
can only be dealt with by a project team’s efficiency,
experience, knowledge and resources.
 Efficiency in upkeep of Task EVMs by Task-Managers can
vary as per the priority of the task itself, associated works,
time and expertise in finance/management.
 Model of Vash-Rung tourism facility project is based on
hypothetical company, costs, schedules, team members and
potential for revenue in the project. It is not to be used for any
practical approaches, except for getting an idea for such
projects.
CONCLUSION
 Earned value management methodology takes into account
all three triple constraints that may delay a project or cost
extra expenditure.
 There always remain an element of error and difference
between on-ground project status and management level
documentation and tools like EVM. Proposed model for
dividing Master-EVM into task-EVMs will keep all stakeholders
onboard at any instant of time and real-time project
performance will be measured affectively.
 Project Risk Management is another major factor that assures
project performance and efficiency of team. Project Managers
generally avoid maintaining a risk register. Proposed model
for incorporating risks into EVM at planning level will give a
clear insight to all stakeholders. Moreover, during the project
life cycle, clear visibility of forthcoming risks will ensure early
risk responses.
FUTURE RESEARCHES
 Future researches can target reducing the gap between
theoretical/financial models and practice/physical status
of a Project.
 Identifying and quantifying risks is core competency of
any project management organization. Project Risk
Management integration with planning, execution and
monitoring & controlling of a project can be another area
of research.
 Hypothetical model of a tourism facility in Kund Malir
can be a full fledge research and business project, that
can be studied and implemented practically.
 Use of sustainable energy resources, capacity building
of local population and self-sufficiency in water
resources are few other areas that can be researched
for business as well as for poverty alleviation.
REFERENCES
 PMI’s Project Management Body of Knowledge
PMBOK®.
 Practice Standard for Earned Value Management.
 Practice Standard for Project Risk management.
 "Technical Performance Measurement, Earned Value, and Risk
Management: An Integrated Diagnostic Tool for Program
Management". Defense Acquisition University Acquisition
Research Symposium, 1999.
 "ANSI EIA-748 Standard - Earned Value Management Systems",
Electronic Industries Alliance. 1998.
 F. T. Anbari, “Earned value management: method and
extensions”, Project Management Journal, Dec 2003; 34:4.
 Andrzej Czemplik, “Application of Earned Value Method to
Progress Control of Construction projects”, seminar, Theoretical
Foundation of Civil Engineering, 2014.
 Quentin W. F., Joel M. K., “Earned Value Management: Mitigating
the Risks Associated with Construction Projects” Project
Management March-April 2002.
 Azeem S.A., Hossam E. Hosny, Ahmed H. Ibrahim, “Forecasting
project schedule performance using probabilistic and
deterministic models” HBRC Journal (2014)10, 35–42.
 Fernando A., Javier P., José M. G. & Adolfo L. P.,
“Beyond Earned Value Management: A Graphical
Framework for Integrated Cost, Schedule and Risk
Monitoring”, 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete, Greece,
2012.
 Robert T., Shaw C. & Mark B., “Earned Value
Management: Moving towards government-wide
implementation”, Acquisition Advisory, August 2005.
 Quentin W. F. & Joel M. K., “Earned Value Project
Management: A Powerful Tool for Software Projects”,
Crosstalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering,
July 1998, 19-23.
 A. Naderpour & M. Mofid, “Improving Construction
Management of an Educational Center by Applying
Earned Value Technique”, The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific
Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction,
2011.
THANK YOU
Dedicated to:
Dr. Muhammad Zaki Rashidi
Mr. Syed Ahsan Rizvi
Mr. Kashif Siddiqui
Mr. Muhammad Iftikhar Mubashir

Earned Value Management (EVM) Limitations

  • 1.
    EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT IncorporatingRisks and integrated Master-EVM models Muhammad Iftikhar Anjum
  • 2.
    “You cannot managewhat you cannot measure…and what gets measured gets done.” Bill Hewlett, Co-founder Hewlett Packard
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION  Earned ValueManagement (EVM) is an effective tool for project performance measurement on Time, Cost & Scope baselines  If used properly, EVM can ensure project success without major delays  EVM models are mainly effective for Predictive Life Cycle Projects  Certain limitations are associated with use of EVM, for which different extensions have been proposed by various researchers
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION In this Study EVM models (Task-EVM) for each task is proposed that are to be integrated for Project or Master-EVM  Risk Costs and Time Buffers are added in Planned Value (PV) calculations based on probability-impact factors for Risk  In order to apply the proposed EVM extensions, a hypothetical tourism facility project is taken as a model
  • 5.
    AIM OF STUDY Aimof the study is to propose techniques for addressing EVM model limitations based on a Hypothetical Tourism Facility Project
  • 6.
    BASIC CONCEPTS -EVM PV: Planned Value EV: Earned Value AC: Actual Cost SV: Schedule Variance SV = EV – PV CV: Cost Variance CV = EV – AC Cost TimeTime t PV EV AC Schedule Variance Management Reserve Cost Variance
  • 7.
    COST & SCHEDULEPERFORMANCE INDICES Excellent Bad Cost Performance Index CPI = EV/AC Schedule Performance Index SPI = EV/PV 1 or 100% CPI, SPI = 1, Cost & Schedule are as planned
  • 8.
    BASIC CONCEPTS -EVM Cost TimeTime t PV EV AC Schedule Variance Management Reserve Cost Variance BAC EAC
  • 9.
    LIMITATIONS OF EVM Risks are not accounted for in EVM model  Exact measurement of Earned Value (Physical work completed) may not be accurate  There may be variations in Cumulative Earned Value and Physical work done on individual tasks
  • 10.
  • 11.
    HYPOTHETICAL MODEL FORRESEARCH  A Tourism Business Company planned for establishing a tourism facility at Kund Malir, Balochistan  Tourism attractions include, Beach, Landscape, Hangol River, Nani mandar, graves of Bin Qasim’s soldiers, Princes of Hope, Star-sighting etc  Project is named as Vash-Rung Makran (VRM)  Company believes in use of sustainable energy, clean environment and use of local human resource
  • 12.
    TASKS Task Time (weeks)Cost (million of rupees) Hotel Renovation 13 13 Security 12 10 Training 26 10 Patrol Pump 12 20 Shuttle Service 12 40 Wind-Solar Energy System 20 40 Marketing 26 20 Hospital 12 10 Seawater Treatment 24 40 Sewerage Treatment 24 20 Trial Trip 1 1 Plan for Expansion 1 1 Total 50 (based on PERT) 225 Project Vash Rung
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    TASK-EVMS INTO MASTER-EVMMODEL  In order to get the real time data of AC and EV a separate EVM for each task is to be planned and maintained  Task manager, with assistance of accounting/ stores professionals should keep his Task-EVM updated  Data for each Task-EVM is to be communicated to Master-EVM, by a network or data link  Periodicity of update of EVM is to be planned and same is to be used for keeping every concerned onboard of actual project performance
  • 16.
    EXAMPLE At time t,there are 3 parallel tasks A, B & C Cumulative Calculations for Master-EVM EVP = EVA + EVB + EVC ACP = ACA + ACB + ACC + Ο Ο is other associated costs, that does not add to the Physical Work done in terms of cost
  • 17.
    TASK & MASTEREVM *Calculations were made from POM-QM software PERT cost-budgeting module
  • 18.
    INCORPORATION OF RISKFACTORS  Project Risk Management is a factor that assures a project performance and completion as per schedule  PMs usually avoid maintaining a Risk Register  A conflict situation may occur or project performance may be affected badly, if risk management is not done properly  In order to avoid this situation, it is proposed that risks are to be added to EVM planned value (PV)
  • 19.
    INCORPORATION OF RISKFACTORS 0.36 here is Probability-Impact Factor
  • 20.
    INCORPORATION OF RISKFACTORS  All other Risks can be converted in terms of Cost and Schedule  In the model, only Cost & Schedule risks are proposed for incorporation into EVM  For calculation of risk values, Probability-Impact factor (PI) is used in proposed EVM model
  • 21.
    SCHEDULE RISKS  Itis proposed that for schedule risks, buffer times are to be added to all tasks  Calculations of buffer times are on the basis of PI factors for proposed model PIp: Probability-Impact factor (positive risks) RVp : Risk Value (positive risks) RVp PIn : Probability-Impact factor (negative risks) RVn : Risk Value (negative risks) TB: Time Buffer Equation for Buffer Time: TB = (PIn)*(RVn) – (PIp)*(RVp)
  • 22.
    SCHEDULE RISKS -CALCULATIONS  Following table, taking hypothetical values of risks, in 4 tasks was created RV, PS, PR in weeks Petrol Pump Energy Plant Seawater Plant Sewerage Plant PIp 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7 RVp 1 1 2 1 (PIn)*(RVn) 0.4 0.2 0.86 0.7 PIn 0.68 0.74 0.7 0.9 RVn 5 7 3 4 (PIp)*(RVp) 3.4 5.2 2.6 3.7 Time Buffer 3 5 4 3 Planned Schedule 12 20 24 24 Planned Schedule with Risks 15 25 28 27
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    COST RISKS  Itis proposed that for cost risks, additional cost, based on PI factor is to be added to tasks PIp: Probability-Impact factor (positive risks) RVp : Risk Value (positive risks) RVp PIn : Probability-Impact factor (negative risks) RVn : Risk Value (negative risks) RC: Risk Cost (in million of rupees) Equation for Risk Cost: RC = (PIn)*(RVn) – (PIp)*(RVp)
  • 26.
    COST RISKS -CALCULATIONS  Following table, taking hypothetical values of risks, in 4 tasks was created RV, PB, PR in million of Rupees Training Shuttle Service Marketing Sewerage Plant PIp 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7 RVp 1 1 2 1 (PIn)*(RVn) 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 PIn 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 RVn 2 2 3 2 (PIp)*(RVp) 1.4 1.2 2.1 1.8 Risk Costs 1 1 1.5 1.1 Planned Cost 12 20 24 24 Planned Cost with Risks 13 21 25.5 25.1
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY In practical approach, some risks cannot be quantified and are based on previous experience and expert judgment of PM.  There are Force Majeure Risks, like natural disasters, those can only be dealt with by a project team’s efficiency, experience, knowledge and resources.  Efficiency in upkeep of Task EVMs by Task-Managers can vary as per the priority of the task itself, associated works, time and expertise in finance/management.  Model of Vash-Rung tourism facility project is based on hypothetical company, costs, schedules, team members and potential for revenue in the project. It is not to be used for any practical approaches, except for getting an idea for such projects.
  • 30.
    CONCLUSION  Earned valuemanagement methodology takes into account all three triple constraints that may delay a project or cost extra expenditure.  There always remain an element of error and difference between on-ground project status and management level documentation and tools like EVM. Proposed model for dividing Master-EVM into task-EVMs will keep all stakeholders onboard at any instant of time and real-time project performance will be measured affectively.  Project Risk Management is another major factor that assures project performance and efficiency of team. Project Managers generally avoid maintaining a risk register. Proposed model for incorporating risks into EVM at planning level will give a clear insight to all stakeholders. Moreover, during the project life cycle, clear visibility of forthcoming risks will ensure early risk responses.
  • 31.
    FUTURE RESEARCHES  Futureresearches can target reducing the gap between theoretical/financial models and practice/physical status of a Project.  Identifying and quantifying risks is core competency of any project management organization. Project Risk Management integration with planning, execution and monitoring & controlling of a project can be another area of research.  Hypothetical model of a tourism facility in Kund Malir can be a full fledge research and business project, that can be studied and implemented practically.  Use of sustainable energy resources, capacity building of local population and self-sufficiency in water resources are few other areas that can be researched for business as well as for poverty alleviation.
  • 32.
    REFERENCES  PMI’s ProjectManagement Body of Knowledge PMBOK®.  Practice Standard for Earned Value Management.  Practice Standard for Project Risk management.
  • 33.
     "Technical PerformanceMeasurement, Earned Value, and Risk Management: An Integrated Diagnostic Tool for Program Management". Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Research Symposium, 1999.  "ANSI EIA-748 Standard - Earned Value Management Systems", Electronic Industries Alliance. 1998.  F. T. Anbari, “Earned value management: method and extensions”, Project Management Journal, Dec 2003; 34:4.  Andrzej Czemplik, “Application of Earned Value Method to Progress Control of Construction projects”, seminar, Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering, 2014.  Quentin W. F., Joel M. K., “Earned Value Management: Mitigating the Risks Associated with Construction Projects” Project Management March-April 2002.  Azeem S.A., Hossam E. Hosny, Ahmed H. Ibrahim, “Forecasting project schedule performance using probabilistic and deterministic models” HBRC Journal (2014)10, 35–42.
  • 34.
     Fernando A.,Javier P., José M. G. & Adolfo L. P., “Beyond Earned Value Management: A Graphical Framework for Integrated Cost, Schedule and Risk Monitoring”, 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete, Greece, 2012.  Robert T., Shaw C. & Mark B., “Earned Value Management: Moving towards government-wide implementation”, Acquisition Advisory, August 2005.  Quentin W. F. & Joel M. K., “Earned Value Project Management: A Powerful Tool for Software Projects”, Crosstalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, July 1998, 19-23.  A. Naderpour & M. Mofid, “Improving Construction Management of an Educational Center by Applying Earned Value Technique”, The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, 2011.
  • 35.
    THANK YOU Dedicated to: Dr.Muhammad Zaki Rashidi Mr. Syed Ahsan Rizvi Mr. Kashif Siddiqui Mr. Muhammad Iftikhar Mubashir