Economy Profile: Doing business 2013

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

© 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /
The World Bank
1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433
Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org
All rights reserved.
1 2 3 4 15 14 13 12
A copublication of The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation.
This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions.
Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content
included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the
content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk
of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you.
The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not
necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or
the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of
the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other
information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of
The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or
acceptance of such boundaries.
Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of
the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically
reserved.
Rights and Permissions

This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
(CC BY 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. Under the Creative
Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt
this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions:
Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2013. Doing Business 2013:
Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World
Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9615-5. License: Creative Commons
Attribution CC BY 3.0
Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following
disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World
Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank
shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation.
All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher,
The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625;
e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org.
Additional copies of all 10 editions of Doing Business may be purchased at
www.doingbusiness.org.
Cover design: Corporate Visions, Inc.

2

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

3

CONTENTS
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4
The business environment .......................................................................................................... 5
Starting a business ..................................................................................................................... 14
Dealing with construction permits ........................................................................................... 23
Getting electricity ....................................................................................................................... 33
Registering property .................................................................................................................. 40
Getting credit .............................................................................................................................. 50
Protecting investors ................................................................................................................... 57
Paying taxes ................................................................................................................................ 66
Trading across borders .............................................................................................................. 74
Enforcing contracts .................................................................................................................... 83
Resolving insolvency .................................................................................................................. 93
Employing workers .................................................................................................................... 99
Data notes ................................................................................................................................. 106
Resources on the Doing Business website ............................................................................ 111

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

4

INTRODUCTION
Doing Business sheds light on how easy or difficult it is
for a local entrepreneur to open and run a small to
medium-size business when complying with relevant
regulations. It measures and tracks changes in
regulations affecting 11 areas in the life cycle of a
business: starting a business, dealing with construction
permits, getting electricity, registering property,
getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes,
trading across borders, enforcing contracts, resolving
insolvency and employing workers.
In a series of annual reports Doing Business presents
quantitative indicators on business regulations and the
protection of property rights that can be compared
across 185 economies, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe,
over time. The data set covers 46 economies in SubSaharan Africa, 33 in Latin America and the Caribbean,
24 in East Asia and the Pacific, 24 in Eastern Europe
and Central Asia, 19 in the Middle East and North
Africa and 8 in South Asia, as well as 31 OECD highincome economies. The indicators are used to analyze
economic outcomes and identify what reforms have
worked, where and why.
This economy profile presents the Doing Business
indicators for Mongolia. To allow useful comparison, it
also provides data for other selected economies
(comparator economies) for each indicator. The data in
this report are current as of June 1, 2012 (except for

the paying taxes indicators, which cover the period
January–December 2011).
The Doing Business methodology has limitations. Other
areas important to business—such as an economy’s
proximity to large markets, the quality of its
infrastructure services (other than those related to
trading across borders and getting electricity), the
security of property from theft and looting, the
transparency
of
government
procurement,
macroeconomic conditions or the underlying strength
of institutions—are not directly studied by Doing
Business. The indicators refer to a specific type of
business, generally a local limited liability company
operating in the largest business city. Because
standard assumptions are used in the data collection,
comparisons and benchmarks are valid across
economies. The data not only highlight the extent of
obstacles to doing business; they also help identify the
source of those obstacles, supporting policy makers in
designing regulatory reform.
More information is available in the full report. Doing
Business 2013 presents the indicators, analyzes their
relationship with economic outcomes and presents
business regulatory reforms. The data, along with
information on ordering Doing Business 2013, are
available on the Doing Business website at
http://www.doingbusiness.org.

Doing Business 2013

5

Mongolia

THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
For policy makers trying to improve their economy’s
regulatory environment for business, a good place to
start is to find out how it compares with the regulatory
environment in other economies. Doing Business
provides an aggregate ranking on the ease of doing
business based on indicator sets that measure and
benchmark regulations applying to domestic small to
medium-size businesses through their life cycle.
Economies are ranked from 1 to 185 by the ease of
doing business index. For each economy the index is
calculated as the ranking on the simple average of its
percentile rankings on each of the 10 topics included in
the index in Doing Business 2013: starting a business,
dealing with construction permits, getting electricity,
registering property, getting credit, protecting
investors, paying taxes, trading across borders,
enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The
ranking on each topic is the simple average of the
percentile rankings on its component indicators (see
the data notes for more details). The employing workers
indicators are not included in this year’s aggregate ease
of doing business ranking, but the data are presented
in this year’s economy profile.
The aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business
benchmarks each economy’s performance on the
indicators against that of all other economies in the
Doing Business sample (figure 1.1). While this ranking
tells much about the business environment in an
economy, it does not tell the whole story. The ranking on
the ease of doing business, and the underlying
indicators, do not measure all aspects of the business
environment that matter to firms and investors or that
affect the competitiveness of the economy. Still, a high
ranking does mean that the government has created a
regulatory environment conducive to operating a
business.

ECONOMY OVERVIEW

Region: East Asia & Pacific
Income category: Lower middle income
Population: 2,800,114
GNI per capita (US$): 2,320
DB2013 rank: 76
DB2012 rank: 88*
Change in rank: 12
* DB2012 ranking shown is not last year’s published
ranking but a comparable ranking for DB2012 that
captures the effects of such factors as data
corrections and the addition of 2 economies
(Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. See
the data notes for sources and definitions.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Figure 1.1 Where economies stand in the global ranking on the ease of doing business

Source: Doing Business database.

6

Doing Business 2013

7

Mongolia

For policy makers, knowing where their economy
stands in the aggregate ranking on the ease of
doing business is useful. Also useful is to know how
it ranks relative to comparator economies and

relative to the regional average (figure 1.2). The
economy’s rankings on the topics included in the
ease of doing business index provide another
perspective (figure 1.3).

Figure 1.2 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of doing business


Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Figure 1.3 How Mongolia ranks on Doing Business topics


8

Doing Business 2013

9

Mongolia

Just as the overall ranking on the ease of doing business
tells only part of the story, so do changes in that ranking.
Yearly movements in rankings can provide some indication
of changes in an economy’s regulatory environment for
firms, but they are always relative. An economy’s ranking
might change because of developments in other
economies. An economy that implemented business
regulation reforms may fail to rise in the rankings (or may
even drop) if it is passed by others whose business
regulation reforms had a more significant impact as
measured by Doing Business.

year Doing Business introduced the distance to frontier
measure. This measure shows how far each economy is
from the best performance achieved by any economy since
2005 on each indicator in 9 Doing Business indicator sets.

Comparing the measure for an economy at 2 points in
time allows users to assess how much the economy’s
regulatory environment as measured by Doing Business
has changed over time—how far it has moved toward (or
away from) the most efficient practices and strongest
regulations in areas covered by Doing Business (figure 1.4).
The results may show that the pace of change varies widely
Moreover, year-to-year changes in the overall rankings do across the areas measured. They also may show that an
not reflect how the business regulatory environment in an economy is relatively close to the frontier in some areas
economy has changed over time—or how it has changed and relatively far from it in others.
in different areas. To aid in assessing such changes, last
Figure 1.4 How far has Mongolia come in the areas measured by Doing Business?

Note: The distance to frontier measure shows how far on average an economy is from the best performance achieved by any
economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing
the best performance (the frontier). The overall distance to frontier is the average of the distance to frontier in the 9 indicator sets
shown in the figure. See the data notes for more details on the distance to frontier measure.

Doing Business 2013

10

Mongolia

The absolute values of the indicators tell another part
of the story (table 1.1). The indicators, on their own or
in comparison with the indicators of a good practice
economy or those of comparator economies in the
region, may reveal bottlenecks reflected in large
numbers of procedures, long delays or high costs. Or
they may reveal unexpected strengths in an area of

business regulation—such as a regulatory process that
can be completed with a small number of procedures
in a few days and at a low cost. Comparison of the
economy’s indicators today with those in the previous
year may show where substantial bottlenecks persist—
and where they are diminishing.

Mongolia DB2013

Mongolia DB2012

China DB2013

Japan DB2013

Kazakhstan DB2013

Korea, Rep. DB2013

Russian Federation
DB2013

Taiwan, China DB2013

Best performer globally
DB2013

Table 1.1 Summary of Doing Business indicators for Mongolia

Starting a Business
(rank)

39

95

151

114

25

24

101

16

New Zealand (1)

Procedures (number)

7

7

13

8

6

5

8

3

New Zealand (1)*

Time (days)

12

13

33

23

19

7

18

10

New Zealand (1)

Cost (% of income per
capita)

2.4

2.9

2.1

7.5

0.6

14.6

2.0

2.4

Slovenia (0.0)

Paid-in Min. Capital (%
of income per capita)

0.0

36.0

85.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.4

0.0

91 Economies (0.0)*

Dealing with
Construction Permits
(rank)

121

121

181

72

155

26

178

9

Hong Kong SAR,
China (1)

Procedures (number)

19

19

28

14

32

11

42

11

Hong Kong SAR,
China (6)*

Time (days)

208

208

270

193

189

29

344

94

Singapore (26)

capita)

39.2

50.1

375.3

28.5

103.5

127.2

129.2

16.3

Qatar (1.1)

Indicator

11

Mongolia DB2012

China DB2013

Japan DB2013

Kazakhstan DB2013

Korea, Rep. DB2013

Russian Federation
DB2013


DB2013

Mongolia

Mongolia DB2013

Doing Business 2013

169

168

114

27

80

3

184

6

Iceland (1)

8

8

5

3

6

4

10

4

Germany (3)*

126

126

145

105

88

28

281

24

Germany (17)

1,012.6

1,104.6

547.0

0.0

71.1

33.3

1,573.7

50.4

Japan (0.0)

Registering Property
(rank)

22

24

44

64

28

75

46

32

Georgia (1)

Procedures (number)

5

5

4

6

4

7

5

3

Georgia (1)*

Time (days)

11

11

29

14

40

11

44

5

Portugal (1)

Cost (% of property
value)

2.1

2.1

3.6

5.8

0.1

5.1

0.2

6.2

Belarus (0.0)*

Getting Credit (rank)

53

67

70

23

83

12

104

70

United Kingdom (1)*

Strength of legal rights
index (0-10)

6

6

6

7

4

8

3

5

Malaysia (10)*

Depth of credit
information index (0-6)

5

4

4

6

5

6

5

5

United Kingdom (6)*

Public registry coverage
(% of adults)

58.9

51.4

27.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Portugal (90.7)

Private bureau
coverage (% of adults)

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.0

39.3

100.0

45.4

94.1

United Kingdom
(100.0)*

Protecting Investors
(rank)

25

29

100

19

10

49

117

32

New Zealand (1)

Extent of disclosure

6

5

10

7

9

7

6

9

Hong Kong SAR,

Indicator

Getting Electricity
(rank)
Procedures (number)
Time (days)
capita)

12

index (0-10)

DB2013


Russian Federation
DB2013

Korea, Rep. DB2013

Kazakhstan DB2013

Japan DB2013

China DB2013

Mongolia

Mongolia DB2012

Indicator

Mongolia DB2013

Doing Business 2013

China (10)*

Extent of director
liability index (0-10)

8

8

1

6

6

4

2

5

Singapore (9)*

Ease of shareholder
suits index (0-10)

6

6

4

8

9

7

6

5

New Zealand (10)*

Strength of investor
protection index (0-10)

6.7

6.3

5.0

7.0

8.0

6.0

4.7

6.3

New Zealand (9.7)

Paying Taxes (rank)

70

65

122

127

17

30

64

54

United Arab Emirates
(1)

Payments (number per
year)

41

41

7

14

7

10

7

12

Hong Kong SAR,
China (3)*

Time (hours per year)

192

192

338

330

188

207

177

221

United Arab Emirates
(12)

Trading Across Borders
(rank)

175

174

68

19

182

3

162

23

Singapore (1)

Documents to export
(number)

10

10

8

3

9

3

8

6

France (2)

Time to export (days)

49

46

21

10

81

7

21

10

Singapore (5)*

2,555

2,265

580

880

4,685

665

2,820

655

Malaysia (435)

Documents to import
(number)

11

11

5

5

12

3

11

6

France (2)

Time to import (days)

50

47

24

11

69

7

36

10

Singapore (4)

2,710

2,400

615

970

4,665

695

2,920

720

Malaysia (420)

Cost to export (US$ per
container)

Cost to import (US$ per
container)

13

Japan DB2013

Kazakhstan DB2013

Korea, Rep. DB2013

DB2013

China DB2013

Enforcing Contracts
(rank)

29

29

19

35

28

2

11

90

Luxembourg (1)

Time (days)

314

314

406

360

370

230

270

510

Singapore (150)

Cost (% of claim)

30.6

30.6

11.1

32.2

22.0

10.3

13.4

17.7

Bhutan (0.1)

Procedures (number)

32

32

37

30

37

33

36

45

Ireland (21)*

Resolving Insolvency
(rank)

127

130

82

1

55

14

53

15

Japan (1)

Time (years)

4.0

4.0

1.7

0.6

1.5

1.5

2.0

1.9

Ireland (0.4)

Cost (% of estate)

8

8

22

4

15

4

9

4

Singapore (1)*

Outcome (0 as
piecemeal sale and 1 as
going concern)

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

Recovery rate (cents on
the dollar)

22.7

35.7

92.8

43.1

81.8

43.4

81.8

Indicator

21.1

Russian Federation
DB2013

Mongolia DB2012


Mongolia

Mongolia DB2013

Doing Business 2013

Japan (92.8)

Note: DB2012 rankings shown are not last year’s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of
such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. The ranking
methodology for the paying taxes indicators changed in Doing Business 2013; see the data notes for details. For more information

on “no practice” marks, see the data notes. Data for the outcome of the resolving insolvency indicator are not available for
DB2012.
* Two or more economies share the top ranking on this indicator. A number shown in place of an economy’s name indicates the
number of economies that share the top ranking on the indicator. For a list of these economies, see the Doing Business website
(http://www.doingbusiness.org).

Doing Business 2013

14

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
Formal registration of companies has many
immediate benefits for the companies and for
business owners and employees. Legal entities can
outlive their founders. Resources are pooled as
several shareholders join forces to start a company.
Formally registered companies have access to
services and institutions from courts to banks as
well as to new markets. And their employees can
benefit from protections provided by the law. An
additional benefit comes with limited liability
companies. These limit the financial liability of
company owners to their investments, so personal
assets of the owners are not put at risk. Where
governments make registration easy, more
entrepreneurs start businesses in the formal sector,
creating more good jobs and generating more
revenue for the government.

WHAT THE STARTING A BUSINESS
INDICATORS MEASURE
Procedures to legally start and operate a
company (number)
Preregistration (for example, name
verification or reservation, notarization)
Registration in the economy’s largest
business city
Postregistration (for example, social security
registration, company seal)
Time required to complete each procedure
(calendar days)
Does not include time spent gathering
information

What do the indicators cover?

Each procedure starts on a separate day

Doing Business measures the ease of starting a
business in an economy by recording all
procedures officially required or commonly done in
practice by an entrepreneur to start up and
formally operate an industrial or commercial
business—as well as the time and cost required to
complete these procedures. It also records the
paid-in minimum capital that companies must
deposit before registration (or within 3 months).
The ranking on the ease of starting a business is
the simple average of the percentile rankings on
the 4 component indicators: procedures, time, cost
and paid-in minimum capital requirement.

Procedure completed once final document is
received
No prior contact with officials
Cost required to complete each procedure
(% of income per capita)
Official costs only, no bribes
No professional fees unless services required
by law
Paid-in minimum capital (% of income
per capita)

To make the data comparable across economies,
Doing Business uses several assumptions about the
business and the procedures. It assumes that all
information is readily available to the entrepreneur
and that there has been no prior contact with
officials. It also assumes that the entrepreneur will
pay no bribes. And it assumes that the business:



Has a start-up capital of 10 times income per
capita.





Is a limited liability company, located in the
largest business city.

Has a turnover of at least 100 times income per
capita.



Does not qualify for any special benefits.



Has between 10 and 50 employees.



Does not own real estate.



Conducts general commercial or industrial
activities.



Is 100% domestically owned.

Deposited in a bank or with a notary before
registration (or within 3 months)

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

15

STARTING A BUSINESS
Where does the economy stand today?
What does it take to start a business in Mongolia?
According to data collected by Doing Business, starting
a business there requires 7 procedures, takes 12 days,

costs 2.4% of income per capita and requires paid-in
minimum capital of 0.0% of income per capita (figure
2.1).

Figure 2.1 What it takes to start a business in Mongolia
Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita): 0.0

Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of
the starting a business indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the
procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

Doing Business 2013

16

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
Globally, Mongolia stands at 39 in the ranking of 185
economies on the ease of starting a business (figure
2.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the

regional average ranking provide other useful
information for assessing how easy it is for an
entrepreneur in Mongolia to start a business.

Figure 2.2 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of starting a business


Doing Business 2013

17

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
What are the changes over time?
While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how
easy (or difficult) it is to start a business in Mongolia
today, data over time show which aspects of the

process have changed—and which have not (table 2.1).
That can help identify where the potential for
improvement is greatest.

Table 2.1 The ease of starting a business in Mongolia over time
By Doing Business report year
Indicator

DB2004 DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013

Rank

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

95

39

Procedures
(number)

8

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

Time (days)

20

13

13

13

13

13

13

13

13

12

Cost (% of
income per
capita)

16.1

12.5

9.6

7.9

6.6

4.0

3.0

3.2

2.9

2.4

Paid-in Min.
Capital (% of
income per
capita)

197.0

182.1

140.2

115.3

96.3

58.5

44.0

46.8

36.0

0.0

Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last
year’s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the
addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year.

Doing Business 2013

18

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by
the economies that over time have had the best
performance regionally or globally on the procedures,
time, cost or paid-in minimum capital required to start
a business (figure 2.3). These benchmarks help show

what is possible in making it easier to start a business.
And changes in regional averages can show where
Mongolia is keeping up—and where it is falling
behind.

Figure 2.3 Has starting a business become easier over time?
Procedures (number)

Time (days)

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
Cost (% of income per capita)

Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)

Note: Ninety-one economies globally have no paid-in minimum capital requirement.

19

Doing Business 2013

20

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
Economies around the world have taken steps making
it easier to start a business—streamlining procedures
by setting up a one-stop shop, making procedures
simpler or faster by introducing technology and
reducing or eliminating minimum capital requirements.
Many have undertaken business registration reforms in
stages—and they often are part of a larger regulatory
reform program. Among the benefits have been

greater firm satisfaction and savings and more
registered businesses, financial resources and job
opportunities.
What business registration reforms has Doing Business
recorded in Mongolia (table 2.2)?

Table 2.2 How has Mongolia made starting a business easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008

No reform as measured by Doing Business.

DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013

Mongolia made starting a business easier by eliminating the
minimum capital requirement for limited liability companies.

Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports
for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org.

Doing Business 2013

21

Mongolia

STARTING A BUSINESS
What are the details?
Underlying the indicators shown in this chapter for
Mongolia is a set of specific procedures—the
bureaucratic and legal steps that an entrepreneur
must complete to incorporate and register a new
firm. These are identified by Doing Business
through
collaboration
with
relevant
local
professionals and the study of laws, regulations and
publicly available information on business entry in
that economy. Following is a detailed summary of
those procedures, along with the associated time
and cost. These procedures are those that apply to
a company matching the standard assumptions
(the “standardized company”)﴿ used by Doing
Business in collecting the data (see the section in
this chapter on what the indicators measure).

STANDARDIZED COMPANY
City: Ulaanbaatar
Legal Form: Limited Liability Company (HHK)
Paid in Minimum Capital Requirement: None
Start-up Capital: 10 times GNI per capita

Summary of procedures for starting a business in Mongolia—and the time and cost
No.

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

1 day

MNT 500

1 day

no charge

1 day

MNT 15,000

6 days

MNT 22,000

Check name for uniqueness at the State Registration Department
of the Tax Authority.
1

Once the name has been checked, the State Registration Office gives
the entrepreneur a card authorizing him or her to open a bank account.
The entrepreneur opens a temporary account at the bank and, at the
same time, can instruct the bank to make a payment to the account of
the Tax Authority.
Pay the registration fee

2
Notarize the statutes and charters of the company; notarize the
schedule showing the equity share held by each partner

3

4

The new Law on State Registration of Legal Entities (Resolution No.123
by the Minister of Justice and Internal Affairs dated July 5, 2011)
requires that the decision to found the company and its charter to be
either originals or notarized copies. Under the Resolution No.123 by the
Minister of Justice and Internal Affairs dated July 5, 2011, notary fees for
certifying the charter of the company is MNT 15,000 and MNT 2,500 for
certifying the equity schedule. However, the LERO does not require the
company's charter to be notarized for local companies although it is
common practice for documents to be notarized to prevent future
shareholder disputes.
Register at the State Registration Office, under the General
Department of State Taxation

Doing Business 2013

No.

22

Mongolia

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

1 day

MNT 2,000

1 day

no charge

1 day

MNT 46,000 rush
delivery fee

By registering at the State Registration Office, the company also
registers for VAT and corporate income tax. The Registry automatically
publishes a notice of company formation. The Registry issues a letter of
approval to open bank accounts. The legal time limit is 5 days (Law on
State Registration of Legal Entities of May 23, 2003). There is no
regulated fee/payment for registration office. However, some district
tax offices requires to pay some small account for their internal file
keeping expenses.
Register at local Tax Office

5

After the account is opened, an officer of the State Registration Office
will assign a company registration number and give the applicant
approval to register with the relevant district tax office, which will open
a file for the new company. Henceforth, one tax officer will be
responsible this company (for example, serving as a point-of contact for
submission of financial reports). The district tax office registers the
company based on the letter issued by State Registration Office.
Apply for social security with the Social Insurance Department

6

Registration for social security with the social insurance department at
the district is free (There is no regulated fee/payment for registration
with social insurance office).
Even though its free, the cost to pay for Social Insurance Certificate (
paper certificate ) for the legal entity is MNT5000.
Make a seal

7
* Takes place simultaneously with another procedure.

Doing Business 2013

23

Mongolia

DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
Regulation of construction is critical to protect the
public. But it needs to be efficient, to avoid
excessive constraints on a sector that plays an
important part in every economy. Where complying
with building regulations is excessively costly in
time and money, many builders opt out. They may
pay bribes to pass inspections or simply build
illegally, leading to hazardous construction that
puts public safety at risk. Where compliance is
simple, straightforward and inexpensive, everyone
is better off.
Doing Business records the procedures, time and
cost for a business to obtain all the necessary
approvals to build a simple commercial warehouse
in the economy’s largest business city, connect it to
basic utilities and register the property so that it
can be used as collateral or transferred to another
entity.
The ranking on the ease of dealing with
construction permits is the simple average of the
percentile rankings on its component indicators:
procedures, time and cost.
business and the warehouse, including the utility
connections.
The business:


Is a limited liability company operating in
the construction business and located in
the largest business city.



PERMITS INDICATORS MEASURE
Procedures to legally build a warehouse
(number)
Submitting all relevant documents and
obtaining all necessary clearances, licenses,
permits and certificates
Completing all required notifications and
receiving all necessary inspections
Obtaining utility connections for water,
sewerage and a fixed telephone line
Registering the warehouse after its
completion (if required for use as collateral or
for transfer of the warehouse)
(calendar days)
information
received
Cost required to complete each procedure (%
of income per capita)

Is domestically owned and operated.



WHAT THE DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION

Has 60 builders and other employees.

The warehouse:


Is a new construction (there was no
previous construction on the land).



Has complete architectural and technical
plans prepared by a licensed architect.



Will be connected to water, sewerage
(sewage system, septic tank or their
equivalent) and a fixed telephone line. The
connection to each utility network will be 10
meters (32 feet, 10 inches) long.



Will be used for general storage, such as of
books or stationery (not for goods requiring
special conditions).



Will take 30 weeks to construct (excluding all
delays due to administrative and regulatory
requirements).

Doing Business 2013

24

Mongolia

What does it take to comply with the formalities to
build a warehouse in Mongolia? According to data
collected by Doing Business, dealing with construction

permits there requires 19 procedures, takes 208 days
and costs 39.2% of income per capita (figure 3.1).

Figure 3.1 What it takes to comply with formalities to build a warehouse in Mongolia

the dealing with construction permits indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on
the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

Doing Business 2013

25

Mongolia

economies on the ease of dealing with construction
permits (figure 3.2). The rankings for comparator
economies and the regional average ranking provide

other useful information for assessing how easy it is for
an entrepreneur in Mongolia to legally build a
warehouse.

Figure 3.2 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of dealing with construction permits


Doing Business 2013

26

Mongolia

easy (or difficult) it is to deal with construction permits
in Mongolia today, data over time show which aspects

of the process have changed—and which have not
(table 3.1). That can help identify where the potential
for improvement is greatest.

Table 3.1 The ease of dealing with construction permits in Mongolia over time
DB2006

DB2007

DB2008

DB2009

DB2010

DB2011

DB2012

DB2013

..

..

..

..

..

..

121

121

Procedures (number)

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

Time (days)

208

208

208

208

208

208

208

208

194.9

160.3

133.9

81.3

61.2

65.1

50.1

39.2

Indicator
Rank

Cost (% of income
per capita)

year’s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and
the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. For more information on “no practice” marks, see the
data notes.

Doing Business 2013

27

Mongolia

time or cost required to deal with construction permits
(figure 3.3). These benchmarks help show what is

possible in making it easier to deal with construction
permits. And changes in regional averages can show
where Mongolia is keeping up—and where it is falling
behind.

Figure 3.3 Has dealing with construction permits become easier over time?
Procedures (number)

Time (days)

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Cost (% of income per capita)


28

Doing Business 2013

29

Mongolia

Smart regulation ensures that standards are met while
making compliance easy and accessible to all.
Coherent and transparent rules, efficient processes and
adequate allocation of resources are especially
important in sectors where safety is at stake.
Construction is one of them. In an effort to ensure

building safety while keeping compliance costs
reasonable, governments around the world have
worked on consolidating permitting requirements.
What construction permitting reforms has Doing
Business recorded in Mongolia (table 3.2)?

Table 3.2 How has Mongolia made dealing with construction permits easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

30

Mongolia

The indicators reported here for Mongolia are
based on a set of specific procedures—the steps
that a company must complete to legally build a
warehouse—identified by Doing Business through
information collected from experts in construction
licensing,
including
architects,
construction
lawyers, construction firms, utility service providers
and public officials who deal with building
regulations. These procedures are those that apply
to a company and structure matching the standard
assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting
the data (see the section in this chapter on what
the indicators cover).

BUILDING A WAREHOUSE
City :

Ulaanbaatar

Estimated
Warehouse Value :

MNT 478,542,956

The procedures, along with the associated time and
cost, are summarized below.

Summary of procedures for dealing with construction permits in Mongolia —and the time and cost
No.

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

28 days

no charge

15 days

no charge

14 days

MNT 60,000

14 days

no charge

Request and obtain environmental impact assessment from the
City Environmental Office

1

2

Article 4.6 of the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, adopted in
1998 and amended on July 20, 2006, provided that authorized
investigators will make a general environmental impact assessment
within 12 working days. If necessary, the related state authority may
extend this time. However, in practice, this takes on average 28 -- 30
days.
Request and obtain land possession agreement and permission to
build.
This agreement can be obtained from the Land Department of the
Office of the Capital City Governor.
Request and obtain approval of preliminary drawings from the
Urban Development Department

3

One letter with drawings is sent to the Urban Development Department
and it is first approved by the Capital City General Architect (within the
Urban Development Department, UDD), then the District Architect, a
member of UDD, approves the drawings and both approvals are
stamped on the same page and sent back to the architect.
Request and obtain approval of preliminary drawings from the
Technical Commission

4

The company must obtain an approval from the Technical Commission
stating that the proposed construction work will not affect any heating,
electrical power, water, sewage or telecommunication lines. The
Technical Commission consists of members from the Heating Network
Authority, Electric Power Network Authority, Water Use Authority,
Telecom Mongolia, Radio Network Authority, Housing and Public

Doing Business 2013

No.

31

Mongolia

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

24 days

MNT 290,601

1 day

MNT 150,000

14 days

MNT 25,000

7 days

MNT 60,000

30 days

MNT 756,949

21 days

no charge

2 days

no charge

1 day

no charge

2 days

no charge

1 day

no charge

Utilities Authority, Environmental Protection Authority, Hygiene and
Sanitation Control Authority, and Fire Fighting Department. There is no
need for the company to visit each authority separately.
* Request and obtain technical conditions from the following
agencies through the Technical Commission:
5

The company must submit a letter of application to receive technical
specifications from the agencies. No other procedures are necessary for
obtaining power connection. Obtaining all technical conditions take on
average 24 -- 30 days. The fee is estimated to vary from MNT 75,000.00
to MNT 390,000.00.
Request and obtain approval of final drawings from the Fire
Department

6

7

For a building of less than 3000 sq. m., this is obtained from the City
Fire Department. Project drawings are inspected and a fee is calculated
based on a schedule set by the Organization of Special Emergencies.
Request and obtain approval of final drawings from the Sanitation
Department

Request and obtain approval of final drawings from the Chief
Architect
8

Submit a copy of the sketch, working drawing, certificate from the Fire
Department and certificate from the Sanitation department to the Chief
Architect to approve.
Request and obtain permission from the State Technical Expert.

9

The expert examination of a construction drawing shall be made by a
consultant selected by Agency of Land Affairs, Geodesy and
Cartography trough a tender. The cost might vary according to the
consultant (MNT 9,700 per sq. m. * 1300.6 sq. m. * 0.06).
Request and obtain a license “to engage in the construction
works” (﴾permission to build)﴿

10

To start the actual construction, BuildCo must obtain a license “to
engage in the construction works” (﴾permission to build)﴿ from the
Ministry of Construction and Town Planning. The law authorizes a
period of 21 business days to issue the license. In practice, however, it
varies.
Request and receive inspection from the Water Use Authority

11
Request and receive inspection from telecom services
12
Connect to water services through the Water Use Authority
13
14

Connect to telecom services

Doing Business 2013

No.

Procedure

Request on-site inspection from the Technical Commission.
15

16

Receive on-site inspection from the Technical Commission and
approval

Request on-site inspection by the State Inspection Authority
17

18

32

Mongolia

Receive on-site inspection and obtain approval of the building by
the State Commission

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

14 days

no charge

1 day

no charge

1 day

no charge

17 days

no charge

14 days

MNT 47,854

After the inspection has been completed, the company waits on
average 10 days for approval.
Register the building in the real estate registry
The Office for Registration of Ownership and Related Rights registers
the right of ownership within 14 days of the application date, and
issues a certificate of ownership. The registration fees to be paid are
equal to 0.01% of the value of the real property.
19

Doing Business 2013

33

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
Access to reliable and affordable electricity is vital
for businesses. To counter weak electricity supply,
many firms in developing economies have to rely
on self-supply, often at a prohibitively high cost.
Whether electricity is reliably available or not, the
first step for a customer is always to gain access by
obtaining a connection.

WHAT THE GETTING ELECTRICITY
INDICATORS MEASURE
Procedures to obtain an electricity
connection (number)
Submitting all relevant documents and
obtaining all necessary clearances and permits

Doing Business records all procedures required for
a local business to obtain a permanent electricity
connection and supply for a standardized
warehouse, as well as the time and cost to
complete them. These procedures include
applications and contracts with electricity utilities,
clearances from other agencies and the external
and final connection works. The ranking on the
ease of getting electricity is the simple average of
the percentile rankings on its component
indicators: procedures, time and cost. To make the
data comparable across economies, several
assumptions are used.

Completing all required notifications and
receiving all necessary inspections
Obtaining external installation works and
possibly purchasing material for these works
Concluding any necessary supply contract and
obtaining final supply
(calendar days)
Is at least 1 calendar day
information

The warehouse:


Is located in the economy’s largest
business city, in an area where other
warehouses are located.



Is not in a special economic zone where
the connection would be eligible for
subsidization or faster service.



Has road access. The connection works
involve the crossing of a road or roads but
are carried out on public land.



Is a new construction being connected to
electricity for the first time.



(% of income per capita)
Excludes value added tax


Is 150 meters long.



Is to either the low-voltage or the mediumvoltage distribution network and either overhead
or underground, whichever is more common in
the economy and in the area where the
warehouse is located. The length of any
connection in the customer’s private domain is
negligible.



Involves installing one electricity meter. The
monthly electricity consumption will be 0.07
gigawatt-hour (GWh). The internal electrical
wiring has been completed.

Has 2 stories, both above ground, with a
total surface of about 1,300.6 square
meters (14,000 square feet), and is built on
a plot of 929 square meters (10,000 square
feet).

The electricity connection:


Reflects the time spent in practice, with little
follow-up and no prior contact with officials

Is a 3-phase, 4-wire Y, 140-kilovolt-ampere
(kVA) (subscribed capacity) connection.

Doing Business 2013

34

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
What does it take to obtain a new electricity
connection in Mongolia? According to data collected
by Doing Business, getting electricity there requires 8

procedures, takes 126 days and costs 1012.6% of
income per capita (figure 4.1).

Figure 4.1 What it takes to obtain an electricity connection in Mongolia

the getting electricity indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the procedures
reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

Doing Business 2013

35

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
economies on the ease of getting electricity (figure

regional average ranking provide another perspective
in assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in
Mongolia to connect a warehouse to electricity.

Figure 4.2 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting electricity


Doing Business 2013

36

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
Even more helpful than rankings on the ease of getting
electricity may be the indicators underlying those
rankings (table 4.1). And regional and global best

performers on these indicators may provide useful
benchmarks.

Table 4.1 The ease of getting electricity in Mongolia

Mongolia DB2013

Mongolia DB2012

Best performer in
East Asia & Pacific
DB2013

Best performer
globally DB2013

169

168

Hong Kong SAR,
China (4)

Iceland (1)

Procedures
(number)

8

8

Timor-Leste (3)

Germany (3)*

Time (days)

126

126

Taiwan, China (24)

Germany (17)

1,012.6

1,104.6

Hong Kong SAR,
China (1.6)

Japan (0.0)

Indicator

Rank

Cost (% of income
per capita)

Note: DB2012 rankings shown are not last year’s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the
effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year.
* Two or more economies share the top ranking on this indicator. For a list of these economies, see the Doing Business website

Doing Business 2013

37

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
Obtaining an electricity connection is essential to
enable a business to conduct its most basic operations.
In many economies the connection process is
complicated by the multiple laws and regulations
involved—covering service quality, general safety,
technical standards, procurement practices and
internal wiring installations. In an effort to ensure

safety in the connection process while keeping
connection costs reasonable, governments around the
world have worked to consolidate requirements for
obtaining an electricity connection. What reforms in
getting electricity has Doing Business recorded in
Mongolia (table 4.2)?

Table 4.2 How has Mongolia made getting electricity easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

38

Mongolia

GETTING ELECTRICITY
The indicators reported here for Mongolia are based
on a set of specific procedures—the steps that an
entrepreneur must complete to get a warehouse
connected to electricity by the local distribution
utility—identified by Doing Business. Data are collected
from the distribution utility, then completed and
verified by electricity regulatory agencies and
independent professionals such as electrical engineers,
electrical contractors and construction companies. The
electricity distribution utility surveyed is the one
serving the area (or areas) in which warehouses are
located. If there is a choice of distribution utilities, the
one serving the largest number of customers is
selected.

OBTAINING AN ELECTRICITY CONNECTION
City:

Ulaanbaatar

Ulaanbaatar Electricity
Distribution Network
(UBEDN)
The procedures are those that apply to a warehouse
and electricity connection matching the standard
assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the
data (see the section in this chapter on what the
indicators cover). The procedures, along with the
associated time and cost, are summarized below.
Name of Utility:

Summary of procedures for getting electricity in Mongolia—and the time and cost
No.

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

37 calendar days

MNT 156,000.0

1 calendar day

no charge

22 calendar days

MNT 2,500,000.0

30 calendar days

MNT 2,000,000.0

Apply to Ulaanbaatar Electricity Distribution Network (UBEDN) for
an electricity connection and await technical conditions
1

Required documents: application, registration of the company, license of
the company, land ownership documents, required load. A 4- or 5member commission within the UEDN meets to consider the request.

* Await and obtain an external inspection from UBEDN for
preparation of technical conditions
2
The utility has to visit the site to determine the best way to connect the
warehouse before the technical conditions can be prepared.
Await completion and approval of the project design of the external
connection completed by a private project design firm

3

The customer hires a specially licensed project design firm which
develops design of the external connection. Once the design is
completed the project design firm makes an appointment at the utility
and takes the design for approval.
In case that the connection crosses a public road, the project design
company should also approve the project at the Road Department of
Ulaanbaatar City.

4

Obtain an excavation permit at the Road Police and at the
Organization for Maintenance and Repair of Roads
If the works involve crossing a road then the customer has to obtain

Doing Business 2013

No.

39

Mongolia

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

30 calendar days

USD 20,000.0

4 calendar days

MNT 680,000.0

2 calendar days

no charge

1 calendar day

no charge

permission for these works in 2 government organizations. The first
organization is called Road Police and the second is Organization for
Maintenance and Repair of Roads.
Await completion of the external connection works by a private
electrical contractor.
5

The customer hires a licensed electrical contractor who installs a
transformer which is required in the assumed case. The electrical
contractor also installs the meter.
Await external inspection of the completed works by a special
committee

6

A committee consisting of an employee of the utility and an employee of
the department specializing in electrical issues at government
organization which includes all inspectorates for various industries visits
the site. At this point the electrical contractor presents his/her license for
the electrical works and technical reports on the installation ((1) working
drawings (showing the electricity connections and cable layouts); (2) a
statement of whether there have been any changes from the original
drawings submitted; (3) a statement listing all persons that have worked
on installing the electrical equipment. The purpose of this statement is to
check whether the work has been done by properly licensed electricians;
(4) a statement certifying that all technical work complies with safety and
technical regulations). Internal wiring is also checked at this point.
If everything is in order during the inspection then the electrical
contractor usually but sometimes the customer has to receive a final
permission for a power turn on at the utility. This involves taking a
special form to 5-7 people to be signed.
Customer signs a supply contract for consumption of electricity at
UBEDN

7

Once the customer has permission for power turn on, he/she can visit
the supply department at the utility and sign a supply contract for
consumption of electricity.
Await for the meter to be sealed by UBEDN and electricity starts
flowing.

8

When the permission for a power turn on is completed, a utility
employee comes to the sight to seal the meter and electricity starts
flowing.


Doing Business 2013

40

Mongolia

REGISTERING PROPERTY
Ensuring formal property rights is fundamental.
Effective administration of land is part of that. If
formal property transfer is too costly or
complicated, formal titles might go informal
again. And where property is informal or poorly
administered, it has little chance of being
accepted as collateral for loans—limiting access to
finance.
Doing Business records the full sequence of
procedures necessary for a business to purchase
property from another business and transfer the
property title to the buyer’s name. The transaction
is considered complete when it is opposable to
third parties and when the buyer can use the
property, use it as collateral for a bank loan or
resell it. The ranking on the ease of registering
property is the simple average of the percentile
rankings on its component indicators: procedures,
time and cost.
several assumptions about the parties to the
transaction, the property and the procedures are
used.
The parties (buyer and seller):


Are limited liability companies, 100%
domestically and privately owned.



Are located in the periurban area of the
economy’s largest business city.



Perform general commercial activities.

INDICATORS MEASURE
Procedures to legally transfer title on
immovable property (number)
Preregistration (for example, checking for liens,
notarizing sales agreement, paying property
transfer taxes)
Registration in the economy’s largest business
city
Postregistration (for example, filing title with
the municipality)
(calendar days)
information
received
(% of property value)
No value added or capital gains taxes included



Has no mortgages attached and has been
under the same ownership for the past 10
years.



Consists of 557.4 square meters (6,000 square
feet) of land and a 10-year-old, 2-story
warehouse of 929 square meters (10,000
square feet). The warehouse is in good
condition and complies with all safety
standards, building codes and legal
requirements. The property will be transferred
in its entirety.

Have 50 employees each, all of whom are
nationals.



WHAT THE REGISTERING PROPERTY

The property (fully owned by the seller):


Has a value of 50 times income per capita.
The sale price equals the value.



Is registered in the land registry or
cadastre, or both, and is free of title
disputes.



Is located in a periurban commercial zone,
and no rezoning is required.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

41

What does it take to complete a property transfer in
Mongolia? According to data collected by Doing
Business, registering property there requires 5

procedures, takes 11 days and costs 2.1% of the
property value (figure 5.1).

Figure 5.1 What it takes to register property in Mongolia

the registering property indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the
procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

Doing Business 2013

42

Mongolia

economies on the ease of registering property (figure

information for assessing how easy it is for an
entrepreneur in Mongolia to transfer property.

Figure 5.2 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of registering property


Doing Business 2013

43

Mongolia

easy (or difficult) it is to register property in Mongolia


Table 5.1 The ease of registering property in Mongolia over time
Indicator

DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013

Rank

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

24

22

Procedures
(number)

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Time (days)

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

Cost (% of property
value)

2.4

2.3

2.2

2.2

2.1

2.1

2.2

2.1

2.1

the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. For more information on “no practice” marks, see
the data notes.

Doing Business 2013

44

Mongolia

time or cost required to complete a property transfer

possible in making it easier to register property. And
changes in regional averages can show where
Mongolia is keeping up—and where it is falling
behind.

Figure 5.3 Has registering property become easier over time?
Procedures (number)

Time (days)

Doing Business 2013

Cost (% of property value)


Mongolia

45

Doing Business 2013

46

Mongolia

Economies worldwide have been making it easier for
entrepreneurs to register and transfer property—such
as by computerizing land registries, introducing time
limits for procedures and setting low fixed fees. Many

have cut the time required substantially—enabling
buyers to use or mortgage their property earlier. What
property registration reforms has Doing Business

Table 5.2 How has Mongolia made registering property easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013


Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business
reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org.

Doing Business 2013

47

Mongolia

The indicators reported here are based on a set of
specific procedures—the steps that a buyer and
seller must complete to transfer the property to the
buyer’s name—identified by Doing Business
through information collected from local property
lawyers, notaries and property registries. These
procedures are those that apply to a transaction
matching the standard assumptions used by Doing
Business in collecting the data (see the section in
this chapter on what the indicators cover).

STANDARD PROPERTY TRANSFER
City:
Property Value:

Ulaanbaatar
MNT 177,217,338

The procedures, along with the associated time and
cost, are summarized below.

Summary of procedures for registering property in Mongolia—and the time and cost
No.

Procedure

Time to
complete

Cost to complete

1 day

MNT 5, 000 (regular)
obtained in 3 days,
MNT 10, 000
(expedited)obtained
in 1 day or 8
business hours

Obtain a non-encumbrance certificate from the Immovable Property
Registration Office

1

The seller obtains, before signing the contract, the mortgage-free
certification from the Immovable Property Registration Office.
Administrative fees of General Authority for State Registration is
determined by the Government Resolution No. 234 dated September 15,
2010. According to the Government Resolution providing “detailed
reference” relating to immovable property the fees are as follows: MNT
5, 000 to obtain a non-encumbrance certificate within 3 days, expedited
service MNT 10, 000 (to obtain a non-encumbrance certificate within 1
day or 8 business hours).

Notary fees
according to the
following schedule:

Notarization of the contract of purchase

2

The contract must be certified by the notary public who is authorized to
operate in the district in which the immovable property is situated. The
contract is prepared by the parties. The authorized representatives of the
parties must be present at the notary office. In Mongolia, a legal entity
cannot own land, only real estate. Thus calculation shall be made only for
the building. As to the land ownership the purchaser after the transfer of
the title of the immovable property, shall make an application to the
Land department of the relevant district to transfer the Land use right to
the purchaser's name. The documentation shall include:
• Non-encumbrance certificate (obtained in Procedure 1)
• Immovable property registration certificate (already in possession of
seller)
• ID card number and registration number of citizen or name, address
and state registration number of legal entity who is certifying
documents.
• Permission of citizen, legal entity and authorized organization if
required by law

1 day

Value of contract (in
MNT): Notary fees
(in MNT)
• 1.000,001 to
10.000,000: MNT
10,000
• 10.000,001 to
25.000,000: MNT
25,000
• 25.000,001 to
100.000,000: MNT
50,000
• 100.000,001 to
300.000,000: MNT

Doing Business 2013

No.

48

Mongolia

Procedure

Time to
complete

• Copy of contract
• Copy of power of attorney, if required
• All documents shall be in original or notarized--Notary Law of February
10, 2011 established that the ID cards and the permission of citizen, legal
entity and authorized organization do not need to be notarized any
longer. The originals can be shown and the officer or related agencies
will only keep a copy.

Cost to complete
100,000
• 300.000,001 to
500.000,000: MNT
200,000
• 500.000,001 or
above: MNT 300,000

Payment of Income or Transfer Tax at a commercial bank

3

Pursuant to Article 21.6 of the Corporate Income Tax Law, the seller shall
withhold the tax imposed on income from the sale of immovable
property and transfer the withholding to the Budget (relevant local tax
authority) within 10 business days upon the sale of the property.
However, in practive, this tax has to be paid and a receipt acknowledging
the payment of income tax has to be submitted to the Immovable
Property Rights Registration Office for the Procedure 4.

1 day

Pursuant to the State
Stamp Law
November 25, 2010.
Art. 38.1.4, the new
fee schedule for
property transfer is
as follows:

Submit application to the Immovable Property Registration Agency

4

2% of property value

Parties submit relevant materials to the Immovable Property Registration
Agency. At the desk, the officer will check all documents and if satisfied
will receive the application; if not he will note the missing documents
and reject the application. The certificate of ownership will be issued
within 7 days after the Registration Agency analyzes all the
• 0.01% fee for
documentation presented, if the normal procedure is followed but in 1
7 days (regular
contract value up to
day if the urgent procedure is chosen. The documentation shall include: procedure) or 1 day MNT 10.000,000
• A request for registration (﴾fill an application form)﴿
(urgent procedure)
• 0.02% fee for
• Original immovable property registration certificate.
contract value
• A notarized copy of the contract (﴾obtained in Procedure 2)﴿
between
• Notarized permission of a citizen, legal entity and authorized
MNT10.000,001organization if required by law
MNT100.000,000
• The origial tax paid slip for income taxes paid at the district tax office
• 0.015% fee for
• Receipt of acknowledgement for the tax payment for immovable
contract value of
property sale as discussed in the Procedure 3.
over
MNT100.000,000
Transfer of the land use right

5

Ownership of the land belongs to the state. It is prohibited to possess
land without valid land certificate. Land use certificates can only be
issued to the Citizens of Mongolia and legal entities established
organized under the laws of Mongolia. Land authorieis of relevant
districts of Ulaanbaatar deal with land management including issuance,
renewal and transfer of land use right certificate within their districts.

7 days

MNT 350,000 fee for
new certificate

Doing Business 2013

No.

49

Mongolia

Procedure
The documentation shall include:
• A request for registration from both parties.
• Copy of the immovable property registration certificate.
• A notarized copy of the contract (﴾obtained in Procedure 2)﴿
• Notarized permission of a citizen, legal entity and authorized
organization if required by law
• The original tax paid slip for income taxes paid at the district tax office
• Receipt acjnowleding the payment of income tax


Time to
complete

Cost to complete

Doing Business 2013

50

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
Two types of frameworks can facilitate access to
credit and improve its allocation: credit information
systems and the legal rights of borrowers and
lenders in collateral and bankruptcy laws. Credit
information systems enable lenders to view a
potential borrower’s financial history (﴾positive or
negative)—valuable information to consider when
assessing risk. And they permit borrowers to
establish a good credit history that will allow easier
access to credit. Sound collateral laws enable
businesses to use their assets, especially movable
property, as security to generate capital—while
strong creditors’ rights have been associated with
higher ratios of private sector credit to GDP.
Doing Business assesses the sharing of credit
information and the legal rights of borrowers and
lenders with respect to secured transactions
through 2 sets of indicators. The depth of credit
information index measures rules and practices
affecting the coverage, scope and accessibility of
credit information available through a public credit
registry or a private credit bureau. The strength of
legal rights index measures whether certain features
that facilitate lending exist within the applicable
collateral and bankruptcy laws. Doing Business uses
case scenarios to determine the scope of the
secured transactions system, involving a secured
borrower and a secured lender and examining legal
restrictions on the use of movable collateral. These
scenarios assume that the borrower:


Is a private, limited liability company.



Has its headquarters and only base of
operations in the largest business city.

WHAT THE GETTING CREDIT INDICATORS
MEASURE
Strength of legal rights index (0–10)
Protection of rights of borrowers and lenders
through collateral laws
Protection of secured creditors’ rights through
bankruptcy laws
Depth of credit information index (0–6)
Scope and accessibility of credit information
distributed by public credit registries and
private credit bureaus
Public credit registry coverage (% of adults)
Number of individuals and firms listed in
public credit registry as percentage of adult
population
Private credit bureau coverage (% of adults)
Number of individuals and firms listed in
largest private credit bureau as percentage of
adult population



Has 100 employees.



Is 100% domestically owned, as is the lender.

The ranking on the ease of getting credit is based on
the percentile rankings on the sum of its component
indicators: the depth of credit information index and
the strength of legal rights index.

Doing Business 2013

51

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
How well do the credit information system and
collateral and bankruptcy laws in Mongolia facilitate
access to credit? The economy has a score of 5 on the
depth of credit information index and a score of 6 on
the strength of legal rights index (see the summary of
scoring at the end of this chapter for details). Higher
scores indicate more credit information and stronger
legal rights for borrowers and lenders.

economies on the ease of getting credit (figure 6.1).
The rankings for comparator economies and the
information for assessing how well regulations and
institutions in Mongolia support lending and
borrowing.

Figure 6.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting credit


Doing Business 2013

52

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
well the credit information system and collateral and
bankruptcy laws in Mongolia support lending and
borrowing today, data over time can help show where

institutions and regulations have been strengthened—
and where they have not (table 6.1). That can help
identify where the potential for improvement is
greatest.

Table 6.1 The ease of getting credit in Mongolia over time
Indicator

DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013

Rank

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

67

53

Strength of legal rights
index (0-10)

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

Depth of credit
information index (0-6)

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

4

5

Public registry

2.3

4.7

10.2

10.8

22.7

22.2

19.2

51.4

58.9

Private bureau

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year.

Doing Business 2013

53

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
One way to put an economy’s score on the getting
credit indicators into context is to see where the
economy stands in the distribution of scores across
economies. Figure 6.2 highlights the score on the
strength of legal rights index for Mongolia in 2012 and

shows the number of economies with this score in
2012 as well as the regional average score. Figure 6.3
shows the same thing for the depth of credit
information index.

Figure 6.2 How strong are legal rights for borrowers
and lenders?

Figure 6.3 How much credit information is shared—
and how widely?

Number of economies with each score on strength of legal
rights index (0–10), 2012

Number of economies with each score on depth of credit
information index (0–6), 2012

Note: Higher scores indicate that collateral and bankruptcy
laws are better designed to facilitate access to credit.

Note: Higher scores indicate the availability of more credit
information, from either a public credit registry or a private
credit bureau, to facilitate lending decisions. Regional
averages for the depth of credit information index exclude
economies with no public registry or private bureau.

Doing Business 2013

54

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
When economies strengthen the legal rights of lenders
and borrowers under collateral and bankruptcy laws,
and increase the scope, coverage and accessibility of

credit information, they can increase entrepreneurs’
access to credit. What credit reforms has Doing

Table 6.2 How has Mongolia made getting credit easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012

Mongolia improved its credit information system by eliminating
the minimum threshold for loans included in the database.

DB2013

Mongolia improved access to credit information by
guaranteeing borrowers’ right to inspect their personal data.


Doing Business 2013

55

Mongolia

GETTING CREDIT
The getting credit indicators reported here for
Mongolia are based on detailed information collected
in that economy. The data on credit information
sharing are collected through a survey of a public
credit registry or private credit bureau (if one exists).
To construct the depth of credit information index, a
score of 1 is assigned for each of 6 features of the
public credit registry or private credit bureau (see
summary of scoring below).

The data on the legal rights of borrowers and lenders
are gathered through a survey of financial lawyers and
verified through analysis of laws and regulations as
well as public sources of information on collateral and
bankruptcy laws. For the strength of legal rights index,
a score of 1 is assigned for each of 8 aspects related to
legal rights in collateral law and 2 aspects in
bankruptcy law.

Summary of scoring for the getting credit indicators in Mongolia
Indicator

Mongolia

East Asia &
OECD high income
Pacific average
average

Strength of legal rights index (0-10)

6

7

7

Depth of credit information index (0-6)

5

4

5

Public registry coverage (% of adults)

58.9

36.4

31.5

Private bureau coverage (% of adults)

0.0

51.2

74.6

Note: In cases where an economy’s regional classification is “OECD high income,” regional averages above are only displayed
once. Regional averages for the depth of credit information index exclude economies with no public registry or private bureau.
Regional averages for the public registry coverage exclude economies with no public registry. Regional averages for the private
bureau coverage exclude economies with no private bureau.


Index score: 6

Can any business use movable assets as collateral while keeping possession of the assets;
and any financial institution accept such assets as collateral ?

Yes

Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in a single category
of movable assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral?

Yes

Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in substantially all of
its assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral?

Yes

May a security right extend to future or after-acquired assets, and may it extend
automatically to the products, proceeds or replacements of the original assets ?

Yes

Is a general description of debts and obligations permitted in collateral agreements; can all
types of debts and obligations be secured between parties; and can the collateral agreement
include a maximum amount for which the assets are encumbered?

Yes

Is a collateral registry in operation, that is unified geographically and by asset type, with an
electronic database indexed by debtor's names?

No

Doing Business 2013

56

Mongolia


Index score: 6

Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before general tax claims and employee claims) when a
debtor defaults outside an insolvency procedure?

No

Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before general tax claims and employee claims) when a
business is liquidated?

No

Are secured creditors either not subject to an automatic stay or moratorium on enforcement
procedures when a debtor enters a court-supervised reorganization procedure, or the law
provides secured creditors with grounds for relief from an automatic stay or

No

Does the law allow parties to agree in a collateral agreement that the lender may enforce its
security right out of court, at the time a security interest is created?

Yes

Private credit
bureau

Public credit
registry

Index score: 5

Are data on both firms and individuals distributed?

No

Yes

1

Are both positive and negative data distributed?

No

Yes

1

Does the registry distribute credit information from
retailers, trade creditors or utility companies as well
as financial institutions?

No

No

0

Are more than 2 years of historical credit information
distributed?

No

Yes

1

Is data on all loans below 1% of income per capita
distributed?

No

Yes

1

Is it guaranteed by law that borrowers can inspect
their data in the largest credit registry?

No

Yes

1

Depth of credit information index (0–6)

Note: An economy receives a score of 1 if there is a "yes" to either private bureau or public registry.

Coverage

Private credit bureau Public credit registry

Number of firms

0

13,309

Number of individuals

0

1,114,275


Doing Business 2013

57

Mongolia

PROTECTING INVESTORS
Investor protections matter for the ability of
companies to raise the capital they need to grow,
innovate, diversify and compete. If the laws do not
provide such protections, investors may be reluctant
to invest unless they become the controlling
shareholders. Strong regulations clearly define
related-party transactions, promote clear and efficient
disclosure
requirements,
require
shareholder
participation in major decisions of the company and
set clear standards of accountability for company
insiders.
Doing Business measures the strength of minority
shareholder protections against directors’ use of
corporate assets for personal gain—or self-dealing.
The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor
protections:
transparency
of
related-party
transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for
self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and
shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for
misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The
ranking on the strength of investor protection index is
these 3 indices. To make the data comparable across
economies, a case study uses several assumptions
about the business and the transaction.
The business (Buyer):
 Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the
economy’s most important stock exchange (﴾or
at least a large private company with multiple
shareholders).
 Has a board of directors and a chief executive
officer (CEO) who may legally act on behalf of
Buyer where permitted, even if this is not
specifically required by law.
The transaction involves the following details:
 Mr. James, a director and the majority
shareholder of the company, proposes that

WHAT THE PROTECTING INVESTORS
INDICATORS MEASURE
Extent of disclosure index (0–10)
Who can approve related-party transactions
Disclosure requirements in case of relatedparty transactions
Extent of director liability index (0–10)
Ability of shareholders to hold interested
parties and members of the approving body
liable in case of related-party transactions
Available legal remedies (damages, repayment
of profits, fines, imprisonment and rescission
of the transaction)
Ability of shareholders to sue directly or
derivatively
Ease of shareholder suits index (0–10)
Access to internal corporate documents
(directly or through a government inspector)
Documents and information available during
trial
Strength of investor protection index (0–10)
Simple average of the extent of disclosure,
extent of director liability and ease of
shareholder suits indices

the company purchase used trucks from another
company he owns.
 The price is higher than the going price for used
trucks, but the transaction goes forward.
 All required approvals are obtained, and all
required disclosures made, though the transaction
is prejudicial to Buyer.
 Shareholders sue the interested parties and the
members of the board of directors.

Doing Business 2013

58

Mongolia

How strong are investor protections in Mongolia? The
economy has a score of 6.7 on the strength of investor
protection index, with a higher score indicating
stronger protections (see the summary of scoring at
the end of this chapter for details).

index (figure 7.1). While the indicator does not
measure all aspects related to the protection of
minority investors, a higher ranking does indicate that
an economy’s regulations offer stronger investor
protections against self-dealing in the areas measured.

economies on the strength of investor protection
Figure 7.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the strength of investor protection index


Doing Business 2013

59

Mongolia

well regulations in Mongolia protect minority investors
today, data over time show whether the protections
have been strengthened (table 7.1). And the global

ranking on the strength of investor protection index
over time shows whether the economy is slipping
behind other economies in investor protections—or
surpassing them.

Table 7.1 The strength of investor protections in Mongolia over time
DB2006

DB2007

DB2008

DB2009

DB2010

DB2011

DB2012

DB2013

Rank

..

..

..

..

..

..

29

25

Extent of disclosure
index (0-10)

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

6

Extent of director
liability index (010)

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

Ease of shareholder
suits index (0-10)

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

Strength of
investor protection
index (0-10)

6.3

6.3

6.3

6.3

6.3

6.3

6.3

6.7

Indicator


Doing Business 2013

60

Mongolia

One way to put an economy’s scores on the protecting
investors indicators into context is to see where the
economy stands in the distribution of scores across
economies. Figure 7.2 highlights the score on the
extent of disclosure index for Mongolia in 2012 and

shows the number of economies with this score in
2012 as well as the regional average score. Figure 7.3
shows the same thing for the extent of director liability
index, and figure 7.4 for the ease of shareholder suits
index.

Figure 7.2 How strong are disclosure requirements?

Figure 7.3 How strong is the liability regime for directors?

Number of economies with each score on extent of
disclosure index (0–10), 2012

Note: Higher scores indicate greater disclosure.

Number of economies with each score on extent of
director liability index (0–10), 2012

Note: Higher scores indicate greater liability of directors.
No economy receives a score of 10 on the extent of
director liability index.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Figure 7.4 How easy is access to internal corporate documents?
Number of economies with each score on ease of
shareholder suits index (0–10), 2012

Note: Higher scores indicate greater powers of shareholders
to challenge the transaction.

61

Doing Business 2013

62

Mongolia

The scores recorded over time for Mongolia on the
strength of investor protection index may also be
revealing (figure 7.5). Equally interesting may be the

changes over time in the regional average score on
this index.

Figure 7.5 Have investor protections become stronger over time?
Strength of investor protection index (0–10)

Note: The higher the score, the stronger the investor protections.

Doing Business 2013

63

Mongolia

Economies with the strongest protections of minority
investors from self-dealing require more disclosure
and define clear duties for directors. They also have
well-functioning courts and up-to-date procedural
rules that give minority investors the means to prove
their case and obtain a judgment within a reasonable

time. So reforms to strengthen investor protections
may move ahead on different fronts—such as through
new or amended company laws or civil procedure
rules. What investor protection reforms has Doing

Table 7.2 How has Mongolia strengthened investor protections—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013

Mongolia strengthened investor protections by increasing the
disclosure requirements for related-party transactions.

Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for
these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org.

Doing Business 2013

64

Mongolia

The protecting investors indicators reported here for
Mongolia are based on detailed information collected
through a survey of corporate and securities lawyers as
well as on securities regulations, company laws and
court rules of evidence. To construct the extent of
disclosure, extent of director liability and ease of

shareholder suits indices, a score is assigned for each
of a range of conditions relating to disclosure, director
liability and shareholder suits in a standard case study
transaction (see the notes at the end of this chapter).
The summary below shows the details underlying the
scores for Mongolia.

Summary of scoring for the protecting investors indicators in Mongolia
Indicator

Mongolia

East Asia &
OECD high income
Pacific average
average

Extent of disclosure index (0-10)

6

5

6

Extent of director liability index (0-10)

8

5

5

Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)

6

6

7

6.7

5.4

6.1

Strength of investor protection index (0-10)

once.

Score

Score description

Extent of disclosure index (0-10)

6

What corporate body provides legally sufficient
approval for the transaction?

3

Shareholders meeting and Mr. James
is not allowed to vote

Whether disclosure of the conflict of interest by Mr.
James to the board of directors is required?

2

Full disclosure of all material facts

Whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to
the public and/or shareholders is required?

0

No disclosure obligation

Whether disclosure of the transaction in published
periodic filings (annual reports) is required?

1

Disclosure on the transaction only

Whether an external body must review the terms of
the transaction before it takes place?

0

No

Extent of director liability index (0-10)

8

Whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively
for the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction
causes to the company?

1

Yes

Doing Business 2013

65

Mongolia

Score

Score description

Whether shareholders can hold Mr. James liable for
the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction causes
to the company?

2

Liable for unfair/oppressive
transaction or prejudicial to minority
shareholders

Whether shareholders can hold members of the
approving body liable for the damage that the BuyerSeller transaction causes to the company?

2

Liable for unfair/oppressive
transaction or prejudicial to minority
shareholders

Whether a court can void the transaction upon a
successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff?

2

Possible when the transaction is unfair
or entails a conflict of interest

Whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm
caused to the company upon a successful claim by
the shareholder plaintiff?

1

Yes

Whether Mr. James repays profits made from the
transaction upon a successful claim by the
shareholder plaintiff?

0

No

Whether fines and imprisonment can be applied
against Mr. James?

0

No

Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)

6

Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's
shares can inspect transaction documents before
filing suit?

1

Yes

Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's
shares can request an inspector to investigate the
transaction?

0

No

Whether the plaintiff can obtain any documents from
the defendant and witnesses during trial?

4

Any information that may lead to the
discovery of relevant information

Whether the plaintiff can request categories of
documents from the defendant without identifying
specific ones?

0

No

Whether the plaintiff can directly question the
defendant and witnesses during trial?

0

No

Whether the level of proof required for civil suits is
lower than that of criminal cases?

1

Yes

Strength of investor protection index (0-10)

6.7

Doing Business 2013

66

Mongolia

PAYING TAXES
Taxes are essential. They fund the public amenities,
infrastructure and services that are crucial for a
properly functioning economy. But the level of tax
rates needs to be carefully chosen—and needless
complexity in tax rules avoided. According to
Doing Business data, in economies where it is more
difficult and costly to pay taxes, larger shares of
economic activity end up in the informal sector—
where businesses pay no taxes at all.
Using a case scenario, Doing Business measures
the taxes and mandatory contributions that a
medium-size company must pay in a given year as
well as the administrative burden of paying taxes
and contributions. This case scenario uses a set of
financial statements and assumptions about
transactions made over the year. Information is
also compiled on the frequency of filing and
payments as well as time taken to comply with tax
laws. The ranking on the ease of paying taxes is
its component indicators: number of annual
payments, time and total tax rate, with a threshold
1
being applied to the total tax rate. To make the
data comparable across economies, several
assumptions about the business and the taxes and
contributions are used.

WHAT THE PAYING TAXES INDICATORS
MEASURE
Tax payments for a manufacturing company
in 2011 (number per year adjusted for
electronic or joint filing and payment)
Total number of taxes and contributions paid,
including consumption taxes (value added tax,
sales tax or goods and service tax)
Method and frequency of filing and payment
Time required to comply with 3 major taxes
(hours per year)
Collecting information and computing the tax
payable
Completing tax return forms, filing with
proper agencies
Arranging payment or withholding
Preparing separate tax accounting books, if
required
Total tax rate (% of profit before all taxes)
Profit or corporate income tax
Social contributions and labor taxes paid by
the employer
Property and property transfer taxes



TaxpayerCo is a medium-size business that
started operations on January 1, 2010.

Dividend, capital gains and financial
transactions taxes



The business starts from the same financial
position in each economy. All the taxes
and mandatory contributions paid during
the second year of operation are recorded.

Waste collection, vehicle, road and other taxes



1

Taxes and mandatory contributions are
measured at all levels of government.



Taxes and mandatory contributions include
corporate income tax, turnover tax and all
labor taxes and contributions paid by the
company.



A range of standard deductions and
exemptions are also recorded.

The threshold is defined as the highest total tax rate among the top 15% of economies in the ranking on the total tax rate. It is calculated and
adjusted on a yearly basis. The threshold is not based on any economic theory of an “optimal tax rate” that minimizes distortions or maximizes
efficiency in the tax system of an economy overall. Instead, it is mainly empirical in nature, set at the lower end of the distribution of tax rates
levied on medium-size enterprises in the manufacturing sector as observed through the paying taxes indicators. This reduces the bias in the
indicators toward economies that do not need to levy significant taxes on companies like the Doing Business standardized case study company
because they raise public revenue in other ways—for example, through taxes on foreign companies, through taxes on sectors other than
manufacturing or from natural resources (all of which are outside the scope of the methodology). This year’s threshold is 25.7%.

Doing Business 2013

67

Mongolia

PAYING TAXES
What is the administrative burden of complying with
taxes in Mongolia—and how much do firms pay in
taxes? On average, firms make 41 tax payments a year,
spend 192 hours a year filing, preparing and paying
taxes and pay total taxes amounting to 24.6% of profit
(see the summary at the end of this chapter for
details).

economies on the ease of paying taxes (figure 8.1). The
rankings for comparator economies and the regional
average ranking provide other useful information for
assessing the tax compliance burden for businesses in
Mongolia.

Figure 8.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of paying taxes

Note: DB2013 rankings reflect changes to the methodology. For all economies with a total tax rate below the threshold of
25.7% applied in DB2013, the total tax rate is set at 25.7% for the purpose of calculating the ranking on the ease of paying
taxes.

Doing Business 2013

68

Mongolia

PAYING TAXES
easy (or difficult) it is to comply with tax rules in
Mongolia today, data over time show which aspects of

the process have changed — and which have not
(table 8.1). That can help identify where the potential
for easing tax compliance is greatest.

Table 8.1 The ease of paying taxes in Mongolia over time
DB2006

DB2007

DB2008

DB2009

DB2010

DB2011

DB2012

DB2013

..

..

..

..

..

..

65

70

Payments (number per
year)

41

41

41

41

41

41

41

41


204

204

204

204

192

192

192

192

Total tax rate (% profit)

39.8

39.8

39.8

33.8

24.3

24.3

24.6

24.6

Indicator
Rank

the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. DB2013 rankings reflect changes to the
methodology. For all economies with a total tax rate below the threshold of 25.7% applied in DB2013, the total tax rate is set at
25.7% for the purpose of calculating the ranking on the ease of paying taxes.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

69

PAYING TAXES
performance regionally or globally on the number of
payments or the time required to prepare and file
taxes (figure 8.2). These benchmarks help show what is
Figure 8.2 Has paying taxes become easier over time?
Payments (number per year)


possible in easing the administrative burden of tax
compliance. And changes in regional averages can
show where Mongolia is keeping up—and where it is
falling behind.

Doing Business 2013

PAYING TAXES
Total tax rate (% of profit)


Mongolia

70

Doing Business 2013

71

Mongolia

PAYING TAXES
Economies around the world have made paying taxes
faster and easier for businesses—such as by
consolidating filings, reducing the frequency of
payments or offering electronic filing and payment.
Many have lowered tax rates. Changes have brought

concrete results. Some economies simplifying tax
payment and reducing rates have seen tax revenue
rise. What tax reforms has Doing Business recorded in
Mongolia (table 8.2)?

Table 8.2 How has Mongolia made paying taxes easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008

Mongolia made major revisions in the tax code and reduced
profit tax making paying taxes easier and less costly for
companies. In particular, Mongolia put in place new laws for the
corporate income tax, the value added tax and the personal
income tax, including a new flat tax for individual income.

DB2009

The employer’s contribution for social insurance has been
reduced from 19% to 11%, effective as of January 1, 2008.

DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

72

Mongolia

PAYING TAXES
based on a standard set of taxes and contributions
that would be paid by the case study company
used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see
the section in this chapter on what the indicators
cover). Tax practitioners are asked to review
standard financial statements as well as a standard
list of transactions that the company completed
during the year. Respondents are asked how much
in taxes and mandatory contributions the business
must pay and what the process is for doing so.

LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY
City: Ulaanbaatar

The taxes and contributions paid are listed in the
summary below, along with the associated number of
payments, time and tax rate.

Summary of tax rates and administrative burden in Mongolia
Indicator

East Asia &
OECD high income
Pacific average
average

Mongolia

Payments (number per year)

41

25

12


192

209

176

Profit tax (%)

10.2

16.7

15.2

Labor tax and contributions (%)

12.4

10.9

23.8

Other taxes (%)

2.0

6.9

3.7

Total tax rate (% profit)

24.6

34.5

42.7

once.

Tax or mandatory
contribution
Employer paid - Social
insurance contributions

Payments
(number)

Notes on
payments

Property transfer tax

0

paid jointly

Tax base

11%

gross
salaries

12.4

57

12

Statutory
tax rate

63

12

Corporate income tax

Total tax
Notes on
rate (% of
total tax rate
profit)

Time
(hours)

10% (25% for
taxable profit
exceeding
3,000,000,00
0 togrogs)

taxable
profit

10.2

0

2%

gross sales
price

1.2

Doing Business 2013

Tax or mandatory
contribution

73

Mongolia

Payments
(number)

Notes on
payments

Statutory
tax rate

Tax base

0

1%

property
value

0.6

0

10%

interest
income

0.3

0

varies up to
MNT 100,000

0

10%

gross
salaries

0

withheld

10%

value added
and land
sale

0

not included

Property tax

1

Interest tax

0

Vehicle tax

4

Employee paid - Social
insurance contributions

0

Value added tax (VAT)

12

72

Totals

41

192


Total tax
Notes on
rate (% of
total tax rate
profit)

Time
(hours)

paid jointly

paid jointly

included in
other taxes

0.2

24.6

Doing Business 2013

74

Mongolia

TRADING ACROSS BORDERS
In today’s globalized world, making trade between
economies easier is increasingly important for
business. Excessive document requirements,
burdensome customs procedures, inefficient port
operations and inadequate infrastructure all lead to
extra costs and delays for exporters and importers,
stifling trade potential. Research shows that
exporters in developing countries gain more from
a 10% drop in their trading costs than from a
similar reduction in the tariffs applied to their
products in global markets.
Doing Business measures the time and cost
(excluding tariffs and the time and cost for sea
transport) associated with exporting and importing
a standard shipment of goods by sea transport,
and the number of documents necessary to
complete the transaction. The indicators cover
procedural requirements such as documentation
requirements and procedures at customs and other
regulatory agencies as well as at the port. They also
cover trade logistics, including the time and cost of
inland transport to the largest business city. The
ranking on the ease of trading across borders is
the simple average of the percentile rankings on its
component indicators: documents, time and cost
to export and import.
business and the traded goods.

WHAT THE TRADING ACROSS BORDERS
INDICATORS MEASURE
Documents required to export and import
(number)
Bank documents
Customs clearance documents
Port and terminal handling documents
Transport documents
Time required to export and import (days)
Obtaining, filling out and submitting all the
documents
Inland transport and handling
Customs clearance and inspections
Port and terminal handling
Does not include sea transport time
Cost required to export and import (US$ per
container)
All documentation
Inland transport and handling
Customs clearance and inspections
Port and terminal handling

The business:


Is of medium size and employs 60 people.





Is located in the periurban area of the

Do not require refrigeration or any other
special environment.



Do not require any special phytosanitary or
environmental safety standards other than
accepted international standards.



Are one of the economy’s leading export or
import products.



Are transported in a dry-cargo, 20-foot full
container load.



Is a private, limited liability company,
domestically owned, formally registered
and operating under commercial laws and
regulations of the economy.

The traded goods:


Are not hazardous nor do they include
military items.

Doing Business 2013

75

Mongolia

What does it take to export or import in Mongolia?
According to data collected by Doing Business,
exporting a standard container of goods requires 10
documents, takes 49 days and costs $2555. Importing
the same container of goods requires 11 documents,
takes 50 days and costs $2710 (see the summary of
procedures and documents at the end of this chapter
for details).

economies on the ease of trading across borders
(figure 9.1). The rankings for comparator economies
and the regional average ranking provide other useful
information for assessing how easy it is for a business
in Mongolia to export and import goods.

Figure 9.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of trading across borders


Doing Business 2013

76

Mongolia

easy (or difficult) it is to export or import in Mongolia


Table 9.1 The ease of trading across borders in Mongolia over time
DB2006

DB2007

DB2008

DB2009

DB2010

DB2011

DB2012

DB2013

..

..

..

..

..

..

174

175

Documents to export
(number)

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10


33

33

33

49

46

46

46

49

1,807

1,807

1,807

2,131

2,131

2,131

2,265

2,555

Documents to import
(number)

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11


33

33

33

49

47

47

47

50

2,274

2,274

2,274

2,274

2,274

2,274

2,400

2,710

Indicator
Rank

Cost to export (US$ per
container)

Cost to import (US$ per
container)


Doing Business 2013

77

Mongolia

performance regionally or globally on the documents,
time or cost required to export or import (figure 9.2).

These benchmarks help show what is possible in
making it easier to trade across borders. And changes
in regional averages can show where Mongolia is
keeping up—and where it is falling behind.

Figure 9.2 Has trading across borders become easier over time?
Documents to export (number)


Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Cost to export (US$ per container)

Documents to import (number)

78

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia


Cost to import (US$ per container)


79

Doing Business 2013

80

Mongolia

In economies around the world, trading across borders
as measured by Doing Business has become faster and
easier over the years. Governments have introduced
tools to facilitate trade—including single windows,
risk-based inspections and electronic data interchange

systems. These changes help improve the trading
environment
and
boost
firms’
international
competitiveness. What trade reforms has Doing

Table 9.2 How has Mongolia made trading across borders easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009

A single window, simplifications of customs procedures, partial
introduction of risk management systems, and implementation
of post clearance audits have led to a decrease in time and
documents for export and import.

DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

81

Mongolia

based on a set of specific procedural requirements
for trading a standard shipment of goods by ocean
transport (see the section in this chapter on what
the indicators cover). Information on the
procedures as well as the required documents and
the time and cost to complete each procedure is
collected from local freight forwarders, shipping
lines, customs brokers, port officials and banks.

LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY
City: Ulaanbaatar

The procedural requirements, and the associated time
and cost, for exporting and importing a standard
shipment of goods are listed in the summary below,
along with the required documents.

Summary of procedures and documents for trading across borders in Mongolia
Indicator

Mongolia

East Asia &
OECD high income
Pacific average
average

Documents to export (number)

10

6

4


49

21

10

2,555

923

1,028

Documents to import (number)

11

7

5


50

22

10

2,710

958

1,080

Cost to export (US$ per container)

Cost to import (US$ per container)

once.

Procedures to export

Time (days)

Cost (US$)

Documents preparation

28

145

Customs clearance and technical control

2

160

Ports and terminal handling

5

150

Inland transportation and handling

14

2,100

Totals

49

2,555

Procedures to import

Time (days)

Cost (US$)

Documents preparation

28

110

Customs clearance and technical control

4

150

Doing Business 2013

82

Mongolia

Procedures to import

Time (days)

Cost (US$)

Ports and terminal handling

5

150

Inland transportation and handling

13

2,300

Totals

50

2,710

Documents to export

Documents to import

Bill of lading

Bill of lading

Certificate of origin

Certificate of origin

Commercial invoice

Commercial invoice

Customs export declaration

Customs import declaration

Export certificate

Import permit

Insurance certificate

Insurance certificate

Packing List

Letter of Credit

Railway Bill

Packing list

Technical standard/health certificate

Railway bill (Transport document)

Transit document (for Chinese customs)

Technical standard/health certificate


Transit customs declaration (for Chinese customs)

Doing Business 2013

83

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
Well-functioning courts help businesses expand
their network and markets. Without effective
contract enforcement, people might well do
business only with family, friends and others with
whom they have established relationships. Where
contract enforcement is efficient, firms are more
likely to engage with new borrowers or customers,
and they have greater access to credit.
Doing Business measures the efficiency of the
judicial system in resolving a commercial dispute
before local courts. Following the step-by-step
evolution of a standardized case study, it collects
data relating to the time, cost and procedural
complexity of resolving a commercial lawsuit. The
ranking on the ease of enforcing contracts is the
simple average of the percentile rankings on its
component indicators: procedures, time and cost.
The dispute in the case study involves the breach
of a sales contract between 2 domestic businesses.
The case study assumes that the court hears an
expert on the quality of the goods in dispute. This
distinguishes the case from simple debt
enforcement. To make the data comparable across
economies,
Doing
Business
uses
several
assumptions about the case:

WHAT THE ENFORCING CONTRACTS
INDICATORS MEASURE
Procedures to enforce a contract through
the courts (number)
Any interaction between the parties in a
commercial dispute, or between them and
the judge or court officer
Steps to file and serve the case
Steps for trial and judgment
Steps to enforce the judgment
Time required to complete procedures
(calendar days)
Time to file and serve the case
Time for trial and obtaining judgment
Time to enforce the judgment
Cost required to complete procedures (% of
claim)
No bribes
Average attorney fees
Court costs
Enforcement costs



The seller and buyer are located in the



The buyer orders custom-made goods,
then fails to pay.





The seller sues the buyer before a
competent court.

The dispute on the quality of the goods
requires an expert opinion.





The value of the claim is 200% of income
per capita.

The judge decides in favor of the seller; there
is no appeal.





The seller requests a pretrial attachment to
secure the claim.

The seller enforces the judgment through a
public sale of the buyer’s movable assets.

Doing Business 2013

84

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
How efficient is the process of resolving a commercial
dispute through the courts in Mongolia? According to
data collected by Doing Business, enforcing a contract
takes 314 days, costs 30.6% of the value of the claim
and requires 32 procedures (see the summary at the
end of this chapter for details).

economies on the ease of enforcing contracts (figure
benchmarks for assessing the efficiency of contract
enforcement in Mongolia.

Figure 10.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of enforcing contracts


Doing Business 2013

85

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
easy (or difficult) it is to enforce a contract in Mongolia
today, data on the underlying indicators over time help

identify which areas have changed and where the
potential for improvement is greatest (table 10.1).

Table 10.1 The ease of enforcing contracts in Mongolia over time
Indicator
Rank

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

29

29

Time (days)

314

314

314

314

314

314

314

314

314

314

Cost (% of claim)

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

30.6

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

32

Procedures (number)

Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year’s
published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of
2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year.

Doing Business 2013

86

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
performance regionally or globally on the number of
steps, time or cost required to enforce a contract
through the courts (figure 10.2). These benchmarks

help show what is possible in improving the efficiency
of contract enforcement. And changes in regional
averages can show where Mongolia is keeping up—
and where it is falling behind.

Figure 10.2 Has enforcing contracts become easier over time?
Time (days)

Cost (% of claim)

Doing Business 2013

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
Procedures (number)


Mongolia

87

Doing Business 2013

88

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
Economies in all regions have improved contract
enforcement in recent years. A judiciary can be
improved in different ways. Higher-income economies
tend to look for ways to enhance efficiency by
introducing new technology. Lower-income economies

often work on reducing backlogs by introducing
periodic reviews to clear inactive cases from the docket
and by making procedures faster. What reforms
making it easier (or more difficult) to enforce contracts
has Doing Business recorded in Mongolia (table 10.2)?

Table 10.2 How has Mongolia made enforcing contracts easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

89

Mongolia

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
based on a set of specific procedural steps
required to resolve a standardized commercial
dispute through the courts (see the section in this
chapter on what the indicators cover). These
procedures, and the time and cost of completing
them, are identified through study of the codes of
civil procedure and other court regulations, as well
as through surveys completed by local litigation
lawyers (and, in a quarter of the economies
covered by Doing Business, by judges as well).

COMPETENT COURT
City:

Ulaanbaatar

Court Name:

Ulaanbaatar District
Court

The procedures for resolving a commercial lawsuit, and
the associated time and cost, are listed in the summary
below.

Summary of procedures for enforcing a contract in Mongolia—and the time and cost
Indicator

Mongolia

Time (days)

314

Filing and service

14

Trial and judgment

120

Enforcement of judgment

180

Cost (% of claim)

30.6

Attorney cost (% of claim)

14.9

Court cost (% of claim)

7.2

Enforcement Cost (% of claim)

8.5

Procedures (number)

32

East Asia &
OECD high income
Pacific average
average
522

510

48.6

20.1

37

31

once.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

90

ENFORCING CONTRACTS
No.

Procedure
Filing and service:

1

Plaintiff requests payment: Plaintiff or his lawyer asks Defendant orally or in writing to comply with the contract.

2

Plaintiff’s hiring of lawyer: Plaintiff hires a lawyer to represent him before the court.

*

Plaintiff’s filing of summons and complaint: Plaintiff files his summons and complaint with the court, orally or in
writing.

*

Plaintiff’s payment of court fees: Plaintiff pays court duties, stamp duties, or any other type of court fee.

3

Registration of court case: The court administration registers the lawsuit or court case. This includes assigning a
reference number to the lawsuit or court case.

*

Assignment of court case to a judge: The court case is assigned to a specific judge through a random procedure,
automated system, ruling of an administrative judge, court officer, etc.

*

Judge admits summons and complaint: After verifying the formal requirements, the judge decides to admit
Plaintiff’s summons and complaint.

*

Mailing of summons and complaint: Court or process server, including (private) bailiff, mails summons and
complaint to Defendant.

4

First attempt at physical delivery: A first attempt to physically deliver summons and complaint to Defendant is
successful in the majority of cases.

5

Substituted service: Substituted service is accomplished by publication in newspapers, by affixing a notice in court
or on public bulletin boards, etc.

*

Proof of service: Plaintiff submits proof of service to court.

*

Application for pre-judgment attachment: Plaintiff submits an application in writing for the attachment of
Defendant's property prior to judgment. (see assumption 5)

*

Decision on pre-judgment attachment: The judge decides whether to grant Plaintiff’s request for pre-judgment
attachment of Defendant’s property and notifies Plaintiff and Defendant of the decision. This step may include
requesting that Plaintiff submit guarantees or bonds to secure Defendant

6

Pre-judgment attachment.: Defendant's property is attached prior to judgment. Attachment is either physical or
achieved by registering, marking, debiting or separating assets. (see assumption 5)

7

Report on pre-judgment attachment: Court enforcement officer or (private) bailiff issues and delivers a report on
the attachment of Defendant’s property to the judge. (﴾see assumption 5)﴿
Trial and judgment:

8

Defendant’s filing of defense or answer to Plaintiff’s claim: Defendant files a written pleading which includes his
defense or answer on the merits of the case. Defendant's written answer may or may not include witness statements,
expert statements, the documents Defendant relies on as evidence and the legal authori

Doing Business 2013

No.

Mongolia

91

Procedure

9

Filing of pleadings: Plaintiff and Defendant file written pleadings and submissions with the court and transmit
copies of the written pleadings or submissions to one another. The pleadings may or may not include witness
statements or expert (witness) statements.

*

Court appointment of independent expert: Judge appoints, either at the parties' request or at his own initiative,
an independent expert to decide whether the quality of the goods Plaintiff delivered to Defendant is adequate. (see
assumption 6-b of this case)

10

Notification of court-appointment of independent expert: The court notifies both parties that the court is
appointing an independent expert. (see assumption 6-b of this case)

*

Delivery of expert report by court-appointed expert: The independent expert appointed by the court delivers his
or her expert report to the court. (see assumption 6-b of this case)

*

Setting of date(s) for oral hearing or trial: The judge sets the date(s) for the oral hearing or trial.

*

List of (expert) witnesses: The parties file a list of (expert) witnesses with the court. (see assumption 6-a)

11

Summoning of (expert) witnesses: The court summons (expert) witnesses to appear in court for the oral hearing
or trial. (see assumption 6-a)

12

Oral hearing (prevalent in civil law): The parties argue the merits of the case at an oral hearing before the judge.
Witnesses and a court-appointed independent expert may be heard and questioned at the oral hearing.

*

Final arguments: The parties present their final factual and legal arguments to the court either by oral presentation
or by a written submission.

13

Judgment date: The judge sets a date for delivery of the judgment.

14

Notification of judgment in court: The parties are notified of the judgment at a court hearing.

15

Writing of judgment: The judge produces a written copy of the judgment.

16

Registration of judgment: The court office registers the judgment after receiving a written copy of the judgment.

17

Court notification of availability of the written judgment: The court notifies the parties that the written
judgment is available at the courthouse.

18

Plaintiff's receipt of a copy of written judgment: Plaintiff receives a copy of the written judgment.

19

Notification of Defendant of judgment: Plaintiff or court formally notifies the Defendant of the judgment. The
appeal period starts to run the day the Defendant is formally notified of the judgment.

20

Appeal period: By law, Defendant has the opportunity to appeal the judgment during a period specified in the law.
Defendant decides not to appeal. Judgment becomes final the day the appeal period ends.

21

Reimbursement by Defendant of Plaintiff's court fees: The judgment obliges Defendant to reimburse Plaintiff for
the court fees Plaintiff has advanced, because Defendant has lost the case.
Enforcement of judgment:

*

Plaintiff’s hiring of lawyer: Plaintiff hires a lawyer to enforce the judgment or continues to be represented by a
lawyer during the enforcement of judgment phase.

*

Plaintiff’s request for enforcement order: Plaintiff applies to the court to obtain the enforcement order ('seal' on
judgment).

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

No.

Procedure

22

Plaintiff’s advancement of enforcement fees: Plaintiff pays the fees related to the enforcement of the judgment.

23

92

Attachment of enforcement order to judgment: The judge attaches the enforcement order (﴾‘seal’)﴿ to the
judgment.

*

Delivery of enforcement order: The court's enforcement order is delivered to a court enforcement officer or a
(private) bailiff.

*

Plaintiff’s request for physical enforcement: As Plaintiff fears that Defendant might physically resist the
attachment of its movable goods, Plaintiff addresses a request to the judge or to the police authorities to obtain
police assistance during the attachment of Defendant's movable goods.

24

Judge's order for physical enforcement: The judge orders the police to assist with the physical enforcement of the
attachment of Defendant's movable goods.

25

Identification of Defendant's assets for attachment by court official or Defendant: Judge, a court enforcement
officer, a (private) bailiff or the Defendant himself identifies Defendant's movable assets for attachment.

26

Contestation of selection of assets identified for attachment: The party, Plaintiff or Defendant, who was not
involved in the designation of the assets to be attached, contests the selection of assets for attachment.

27

Attachment: Defendant’s movable goods are attached (physically or by registering, marking or separating assets).

28

Report on execution of attachment: A court enforcement officer or private process server delivers a report on the
attachment of Defendant's movable goods to the judge.

29

Sale through public auction: The Defendant’s movable property is sold at public auction.

30

Judge's decision on bids: The judge determines the adequacy of the bids presented at public auction.

31

Reimbursement of Plaintiff’s enforcement fees: Defendant reimburses Plaintiff's enforcement fees which Plaintiff
had advanced previously.

32

Payment: Court orders that the proceeds of the public auction or the direct sale be delivered to Plaintiff.


Doing Business 2013

93

Mongolia

RESOLVING INSOLVENCY
A robust bankruptcy system functions as a filter,
ensuring the survival of economically efficient
companies and reallocating the resources of
inefficient ones. Fast and cheap insolvency
proceedings result in the speedy return of
businesses to normal operation and increase
returns to creditors. By improving the expectations
of creditors and debtors about the outcome of
insolvency
proceedings,
well-functioning
insolvency systems can facilitate access to finance,
save more viable businesses and thereby improve
growth and sustainability in the economy overall.
Doing Business studies the time, cost and outcome
of insolvency proceedings involving domestic
entities. It does not measure insolvency
proceedings
of
individuals
and
financial
institutions. The data are derived from survey
responses by local insolvency practitioners and
verified through a study of laws and regulations as
well as public information on bankruptcy systems.

WHAT THE RESOLVING INSOLVENCY
INDICATORS MEASURE
Time required to recover debt (years)
Measured in calendar years
Appeals and requests for extension are
included
Cost required to recover debt (﴾% of debtor’s
estate)
Measured as percentage of estate value
Court fees
Fees of insolvency administrators
Lawyers’ fees
Assessors’ and auctioneers’ fees
Other related fees
Recovery rate for creditors (cents on the
dollar)

The ranking on the ease of resolving insolvency is
based on the recovery rate, which is recorded as
cents on the dollar recouped by creditors through
reorganization, liquidation or debt enforcement
(foreclosure) proceedings. The recovery rate is a
function of time, cost and other factors, such as
lending rate and the likelihood of the company
continuing to operate.

Measures the cents on the dollar recovered
by creditors

business and the case. It assumes that the
company:

Outcome for the business (survival or not)
affects the maximum value that can be
recovered



Is a domestically owned, limited liability
company operating a hotel.



Operates in the economy’s largest business
city.

Present value of debt recovered
Official costs of the insolvency proceedings
are deducted
Depreciation of furniture is taken into
account



Has 201 employees, 1 main secured creditor
and 50 unsecured creditors.



Has a higher value as a going concern—and
the efficient outcome is either reorganization
or sale as a going concern, not piecemeal
liquidation.

Doing Business 2013

94

Mongolia

Speed, low costs and continuation of viable businesses
characterize the top-performing economies. How
efficient are insolvency proceedings in Mongolia?
According to data collected by Doing Business,
resolving insolvency takes 4.0 years on average and
costs 8% of the debtor’s estate, with the most likely
outcome being that the company will be sold as

piecemeal sale. The average recovery rate is 22.7 cents
on the dollar.
economies on the ease of resolving insolvency (figure
benchmarks for assessing the efficiency of insolvency
proceedings in Mongolia.

Figure 11.1 How Mongolia and comparator economies rank on the ease of resolving insolvency


Doing Business 2013

95

Mongolia

While the most recent Doing Business data reflect the
efficiency of insolvency proceedings in Mongolia
today, data over time show where the efficiency has

changed—and where it has not (table 11.1). That can
help identify where the potential for improvement is
greatest.

Table 11.1 The ease of resolving insolvency in Mongolia over time
Indicator
Rank
Time (years)
Cost (% of estate)
Recovery rate
(cents on the
dollar)

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

130

127

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

16.8

16.5

17.0

18.0

20.1

22.0

22.0

20.0

21.1

22.7

year’s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the
addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. “No practice” indicates that in each of the previous 5 years
the economy had no cases involving a judicial reorganization, judicial liquidation or debt enforcement procedure (foreclosure). This
means that creditors are unlikely to recover their money through a formal legal process (in or out of court). The recovery rate for
“no practice” economies is 0.

Doing Business 2013

96

Mongolia

performance regionally or globally on the time or cost
of insolvency proceedings or on the recovery rate

possible in improving the efficiency of insolvency
proceedings. And changes in regional averages can
show where Mongolia is keeping up—and where it is
falling behind.

Figure 11.2 Has resolving insolvency become easier over time?
Time (years)

Cost (% of estate)

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

Recovery rate (cents on the dollar)

Note: Regional averages on time and cost exclude economies with a “no practice” mark.

97

Doing Business 2013

98

Mongolia

A well-balanced bankruptcy system distinguishes
companies that are financially distressed but
economically viable from inefficient companies that
should be liquidated. But in some insolvency systems
even viable businesses are liquidated. This is starting to

change. Many recent reforms of bankruptcy laws have
been aimed at helping more of the viable businesses
survive. What insolvency reforms has Doing Business

Table 11.2 How has Mongolia made resolving insolvency easier—or not?
DB year

Reform

DB2008


DB2009


DB2010


DB2011


DB2012


DB2013



Doing Business 2013

99

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
Doing Business measures flexibility in the regulation of
employment, specifically as it affects the hiring and
redundancy of workers and the rigidity of working
hours. From 2007 to 2011 improvements were made to
align the methodology for the employing workers
indicators with the letter and spirit of the International
Labour Organization (ILO) conventions. Only 4 of the
188 ILO conventions cover areas measured by Doing
Business: employee termination, weekend work,
holiday with pay and night work. The Doing Business
methodology is fully consistent with these 4
conventions. The ILO conventions covering areas
related to the employing workers indicators do not
include the ILO core labor standards—8 conventions
covering the right to collective bargaining, the
elimination of forced labor, the abolition of child labor
and equitable treatment in employment practices.
Between 2009 and 2011 the World Bank Group worked
with a consultative group—including labor lawyers,
employer and employee representatives, and experts
from the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, civil society and the
private sector—to review the employing workers
methodology and explore future areas of research.
A full report with the conclusions of the consultative
group is available at http://www.doingbusiness.org/
methodology/employing-workers.
Doing Business 2013 does not present rankings of
economies on the employing workers indicators or
include the topic in the aggregate ranking on the ease
of doing business. The report does present the data on
the employing workers indicators in an annex. Detailed
data collected on labor regulations are available on the
Doing Business website (http://www.doing business.org).

Particular data for Mongolia are presented here
without scoring.
To make the data on employing workers comparable
across economies, several assumptions about the
worker and the business are used.
The worker:








Earns a salary plus benefits equal to the
economy’s average wage during the entire
period of his employment.
Has a pay period that is the most common for
workers in the economy.
Is a lawful citizen who belongs to the same
race and religion as the majority of the
economy’s population.
Resides in the economy’s largest business city.
Is not a member of a labor union, unless
membership is mandatory.

The business:









Is a limited liability company.
Operates in the economy’s largest business
city.
Is 100% domestically owned.
Operates in the manufacturing sector.
Has 60 employees.
Is subject to collective bargaining agreements
in economies where such agreements cover
more than half the manufacturing sector and
apply even to firms not party to them.
Abides by every law and regulation but does
not grant workers more benefits than
mandated by law, regulation or (if applicable)
collective bargaining agreement.

Doing Business 2013

100

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
What do some of the data show?
One of the employing workers indicators is the
difficulty of hiring index. This measure assesses, among
other things, the minimum wage for a 19-year-old

worker in his or her first job. Doing Business data show
the trend in the minimum wage applied by Mongolia
(figure 12.1).

Figure 12.1 Has the minimum wage for a 19-year-old worker or an apprentice increased over time?
Minimum wage (US$ per month)

Note: A horizontal line along the x-axis of the figure indicates that the economy has no minimum wage.

Doing Business 2013

101

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
Employment laws are needed to protect workers from
arbitrary or unfair treatment and to ensure efficient
contracting between employers and workers. Many
economies that changed their labor regulations in the

past 4 years did so in ways that increased labor market
flexibility. What changes did Mongolia adopt that
affected the Doing Business indicators on employing
workers (table 12.1)?

Table 12.1 What changes did Mongolia make in employing workers in 2012?
Reform

Doing Business 2013

102

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
The data on employing workers reported here for
Mongolia are based on a detailed survey of
employment regulations that is completed by local

lawyers and public officials. Employment laws and
regulations as well as secondary sources are reviewed
to ensure accuracy.

Rigidity of employment index
The rigidity of employment index measures 3 areas of labor regulation: difficulty of hiring, rigidity of hours and
difficulty of redundancy.

Difficulty of hiring index
The difficulty of hiring index measures whether fixedterm contracts are prohibited for permanent tasks; the
maximum cumulative duration of fixed-term contracts;
and the ratio of the minimum wage for a trainee or
first-time employee to the average value added per

worker. (The average value added per worker is the
ratio of an economy’s gross national income per capita
to the working-age population as a percentage of the
total population.)

Difficulty of hiring index
Fixed-term contracts prohibited for permanent tasks?
Maximum length of a single fixed-term contract (months)

Data
No
60 (Sect. 25(2))
[If "no limit", please provide the legal
basis]

Maximum length of fixed-term contracts, including renewals (months)

No limit

Minimum wage for a 19-year old worker or an apprentice (US$/month)

91.9

Ratio of minimum wage to value added per worker

0.32


Doing Business 2013

103

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
Rigidity of hours index
The rigidity of hours index has 5 components: whether
there are restrictions on night work; whether there are
restrictions on weekly holiday work; whether the
workweek can consist of 5.5 days or is more than 6
days; whether the workweek can extend to 50 hours or
more (including overtime) for 2 months a year to

respond to a seasonal increase in production; and
whether the average paid annual leave for a worker
with 1 year of tenure, a worker with 5 years and a
worker with 10 years is more than 26 working days or
fewer than 15 working days.

Rigidity of hours index
Standard workday in manufacturing (hours)

Data
8 hours (Sect.70.2)

50-hour workweek allowed for 2 months a year in case of a seasonal
increase in production?

Yes

Maximum working days per week

5.0

Premium for night work (% of hourly pay) in case of continuous
operations
Premium for work on weekly rest day (% of hourly pay) in case of
continuous operations

0%
50%

Major restrictions on night work in case of continuous operations?

No

Major restrictions on weekly holiday in case of continuous operations?

No

Paid annual leave for a worker with 1 year of tenure (in working days)

15.0

Paid annual leave for a worker with 5 years of tenure (in working days)

15.0

Paid annual leave for a worker with 10 years of tenure (in working days)

18.0

Paid annual leave (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure, in
working days)

16.0


Doing Business 2013

104

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
Difficulty of redundancy index
The difficulty of redundancy index has 8 components:
whether redundancy is disallowed as a basis for
terminating workers; whether the employer needs to
notify a third party (such as a government agency) to
terminate 1 redundant worker; whether the employer
needs to notify a third party to terminate a group of 9
redundant workers; whether the employer needs
approval from a third party to terminate 1 redundant

worker; whether the employer needs approval from a
third party to terminate a group of 9 redundant
workers; whether the law requires the employer to
reassign or retrain a worker before making the worker
redundant; whether priority rules apply for
redundancies; and whether priority rules apply for
reemployment.

Difficulty of redundancy index

Data

Dismissal due to redundancy allowed by law?

Yes

Third-party notification if 1 worker is dismissed?

No

Third-party approval if 1 worker is dismissed?

No

Third-party notification if 9 workers are dismissed?

No

Third-party approval if 9 workers are dismissed?

No

Retraining or reassignment obligation before redundancy?

No

Priority rules for redundancies?

No

Priority rules for reemployment?

No


Doing Business 2013

105

Mongolia

EMPLOYING WORKERS
Redundancy cost
The redundancy cost indicator measures the cost of
advance notice requirements, severance payments and
penalties due when terminating a redundant worker,
expressed in weeks of salary. The average value of

notice requirements and severance payments
applicable to a worker with 1 year of tenure, a worker
with 5 years and a worker with 10 years is used to
assign the score.

Redundancy cost indicator
Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 1 year of tenure, in salary
weeks)
Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 5 years of tenure, in
salary weeks)
Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 10 years of tenure, in
salary weeks)
Notice period for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years
of tenure, in salary weeks)
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 1 year of tenure, in
salary weeks)
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 5 years of tenure, in
salary weeks)
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 10 years of tenure, in
salary weeks)
Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years
of tenure, in salary weeks)

Data
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3

Doing Business 2013

106

Mongolia

DATA NOTES
The indicators presented and analyzed in Doing
Business measure business regulation and the
protection of property rights—and their effect on
businesses, especially small and medium-size domestic
firms. First, the indicators document the complexity of
regulation, such as the number of procedures to start a
business or to register and transfer commercial
property. Second, they gauge the time and cost of
achieving a regulatory goal or complying with
regulation, such as the time and cost to enforce a
contract, go through bankruptcy or trade across
borders. Third, they measure the extent of legal
protections of property, for example, the protections
of investors against looting by company directors or
the range of assets that can be used as collateral
according to secured transactions laws. Fourth, a set of
indicators documents the tax burden on businesses.
Finally, a set of data covers different aspects of
employment regulation.
The data for all sets of indicators in Doing Business
2
2013 are for June 2012.

Methodology
The Doing Business data are collected in a
standardized way. To start, the Doing Business team,
with academic advisers, designs a questionnaire. The
questionnaire uses a simple business case to ensure
comparability across economies and over time—with
assumptions about the legal form of the business, its
size, its location and the nature of its operations.
Questionnaires are administered through more than
9,600 local experts, including lawyers, business
consultants,
accountants,
freight
forwarders,
government officials and other professionals routinely
administering or advising on legal and regulatory
requirements. These experts have several rounds of
interaction with the Doing Business team, involving
conference calls, written correspondence and visits by
the team. For Doing Business 2013 team members
visited 24 economies to verify data and recruit
respondents. The data from questionnaires are
subjected to numerous rounds of verification, leading
to revisions or expansions of the information collected.
2

The data for paying taxes refer to January – December 2011.

ECONOMY CHARACTERISTICS

Gross national income per capita
Doing Business 2013 reports 2011 income per capita
as published in the World Bank’s World Development
Indicators 2012. Income is calculated using the Atlas
method (current US$). For cost indicators expressed
as a percentage of income per capita, 2011 gross
national income (GNI) in U.S. dollars is used as the
denominator. GNI data were not available from the
World Bank for Afghanistan; Australia; The Bahamas;
Bahrain; Barbados; Brunei Darussalam; Cyprus;
Djibouti; Guyana; the Islamic Republic of Iran;
Kuwait; Malta; New Zealand; Oman; Puerto Rico
(territory of the United States); Sudan; Suriname; the
Syrian Arab Republic; Timor-Leste; West Bank and
Gaza; and the Republic of Yemen. In these cases
GDP or GNP per capita data and growth rates from
the International Monetary Fund’s World Economic
Outlook database and the Economist Intelligence
Unit were used.
Region and income group
Doing Business uses the World Bank regional and
income
group
classifications,
available
at
http://data.worldbank.org/about/countryclassifications. The World Bank does not assign
regional classifications to high-income economies.
For the purpose of the Doing Business report, highincome OECD economies are assigned the “regional”
classification OECD high income. Figures and tables
presenting regional averages include economies
from all income groups (low, lower middle, upper
middle and high income).
Population
Doing Business 2013 reports midyear 2011
population statistics as published in World
Development Indicators 2012.
The Doing Business methodology offers several
advantages. It is transparent, using factual information
about what laws and regulations say and allowing
multiple interactions with local respondents to clarify
potential misinterpretations of questions. Having

Doing Business 2013

107

Mongolia

representative samples of respondents is not an issue;
Doing Business is not a statistical survey, and the texts
of the relevant laws and regulations are collected and
answers checked for accuracy. The methodology is
inexpensive and easily replicable, so data can be
collected in a large sample of economies. Because
standard assumptions are used in the data collection,
comparisons and benchmarks are valid across
economies. Finally, the data not only highlight the
extent of specific regulatory obstacles to business but
also identify their source and point to what might be
reformed.
Information on the methodology for each Doing
Business topic can be found on the Doing Business
website at http://www.doingbusiness.org/methodology/.

Limits to what is measured
The Doing Business methodology has 5 limitations that
should be considered when interpreting the data. First,
the collected data refer to businesses in the economy’s
largest business city (which in some economies differs
from the capital) and may not be representative of
regulation in other parts of the economy. To address
this limitation, subnational Doing Business indicators
were created (see the section on subnational Doing
Business indicators). Second, the data often focus on a
specific business form—generally a limited liability
company (or its legal equivalent) of a specified size—
and may not be representative of the regulation on
other businesses, for example, sole proprietorships.
Third, transactions described in a standardized case
scenario refer to a specific set of issues and may not
represent the full set of issues a business encounters.
Fourth, the measures of time involve an element of
judgment by the expert respondents. When sources
indicate different estimates, the time indicators
reported in Doing Business represent the median
values of several responses given under the
assumptions of the standardized case.
Finally, the methodology assumes that a business has
full information on what is required and does not
waste time when completing procedures. In practice,
completing a procedure may take longer if the
business lacks information or is unable to follow up
promptly. Alternatively, the business may choose to
disregard some burdensome procedures. For both
reasons the time delays reported in Doing Business

2013 would differ from the recollection of
entrepreneurs reported in the World Bank Enterprise
Surveys or other perception surveys.

Subnational Doing Business indicators
This year Doing Business completed subnational
studies for Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, the Russian
Federation and the United Arab Emirates. Each of
these countries had already asked to have subnational
data in the past, and this year Doing Business updated
the indicators, measured improvements over time and
expanded geographic coverage to additional cities or
added additional indicators. Doing Business also
published regional studies for the Arab world, the East
African Community and member states of the
Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in
Africa (OHADA).
The subnational studies point to differences in
business regulation and its implementation—as well as
in the pace of regulatory reform—across cities in the
same economy. For several economies subnational
studies are now periodically updated to measure
change over time or to expand geographic coverage
to additional cities. This year that is the case for all the
subnational studies published.

Changes in what is measured
The ranking methodology for paying taxes was
updated this year. The threshold for the total tax rate
introduced last year for the purpose of calculating the
ranking on the ease of paying taxes was updated. All
economies with a total tax rate below the threshold
(which is calculated and adjusted on a yearly basis)
receive the same ranking on the total tax rate
indicator. The threshold is not based on any economic
theory of an “optimal tax rate” that minimizes
distortions or maximizes efficiency in the tax system of
an economy overall. Instead, it is mainly empirical in
nature, set at the lower end of the distribution of tax
rates levied on medium-size enterprises in the
manufacturing sector as observed through the paying
taxes indicators. This reduces the bias in the indicators
toward economies that do not need to levy significant
taxes on companies like the Doing Business
standardized case study company because they raise
public revenue in other ways—for example, through

Doing Business 2013

108

Mongolia

taxes on foreign companies, through taxes on sectors
other than manufacturing or from natural resources
(all of which are outside the scope of the
methodology). Giving the same ranking to all
economies whose total tax rate is below the threshold
avoids awarding economies in the scoring for having
an unusually low total tax rate, often for reasons
unrelated to government policies toward enterprises.
For example, economies that are very small or that are
rich in natural resources do not need to levy broadbased taxes.

Data challenges and revisions
Most laws and regulations underlying the Doing
Business data are available on the Doing Business
website at http://www.doingbusiness.org. All the
sample questionnaires and the details underlying the
indicators are also published on the website. Questions
on the methodology and challenges to data can be
submitted through the website’s “Ask a Question”
function at http://www.doingbusiness.org.

Ease of doing business and distance to
frontier
Doing Business 2013 presents results for 2 aggregate
measures: the aggregate ranking on the ease of doing
business and the distance to frontier measure. The
ease of doing business ranking compares economies
with one another, while the distance to frontier
measure benchmarks economies to the frontier in
regulatory practice, measuring the absolute distance to
the best performance on each indicator. Both
measures can be used for comparisons over time.
When compared across years, the distance to frontier
measure shows how much the regulatory environment
for local entrepreneurs in each economy has changed
over time in absolute terms, while the ease of doing
business ranking can show only relative change.
Ease of doing business
The ease of doing business index ranks economies
from 1 to 185. For each economy the ranking is
calculated as the simple average of the percentile
rankings on each of the 10 topics included in the index
in Doing Business 2013: starting a business, dealing
with construction permits, getting electricity,
registering property, getting credit, protecting

investors, paying taxes, trading across borders,
enforcing contracts, and resolving insolvency. The
employing workers indicators are not included in this
year’s aggregate ease of doing business ranking. In
addition to this year’s ranking, Doing Business presents
a comparable ranking for the previous year, adjusted
for any changes in methodology as well as additions of
3
economies or topics.
Construction of the ease of doing business index
Here is one example of how the ease of doing business
index is constructed. In Finland it takes 3 procedures,
14 days and 4% of annual income per capita in fees to
register a property. On these 3 indicators Finland ranks
in the 6th, 16th and 39th percentiles. So on average
Finland ranks in the 20th percentile on the ease of
registering property. It ranks in the 30th percentile on
th
starting a business, 28 percentile on getting credit,
24th percentile on paying taxes, 13th percentile on
enforcing contracts, 5th percentile on trading across
borders and so on. Higher rankings indicate simpler
regulation and stronger protection of property rights.
The simple average of Finland’s percentile rankings on
all topics is 21st. When all economies are ordered by
their average percentile rankings, Finland stands at 11
in the aggregate ranking on the ease of doing
business.
More complex aggregation methods—such as
principal components and unobserved components—
yield a ranking nearly identical to the simple average
4
used by Doing Business. Thus, Doing Business uses
the simplest method: weighting all topics equally and,

In case of revisions to the methodology or corrections to the
underlying data, the data are back-calculated to provide a
comparable time series since the year the relevant economy or topic
was first included in the data set. The time series is available on the
Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). Six topics
and more than 50 economies have been added since the inception
of the project. Earlier rankings on the ease of doing business are
therefore not comparable.
4
See Simeon Djankov, Darshini Manraj, Caralee McLiesh and Rita
Ramalho, “Doing Business Indicators: Why Aggregate, and How to
Do It” (﴾World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005)﴿. Principal components
and unobserved components methods yield a ranking nearly
identical to that from the simple average method because both
these methods assign roughly equal weights to the topics, since the
pairwise correlations among indicators do not differ much. An
alternative to the simple average method is to give different weights
to the topics, depending on which are considered of more or less
importance in the context of a specific economy.
3

Doing Business 2013

109

Mongolia

within each topic, giving equal weight to each of the
5
topic components.

ability of different government agencies to deliver
tangible results in their area of responsibility.

If an economy has no laws or regulations covering a
specific area—for example, insolvency—it receives a
“no practice” mark. Similarly, an economy receives a
“no practice” or “not possible” mark if regulation exists
but is never used in practice or if a competing
regulation prohibits such practice. Either way, a “no
practice” mark puts the economy at the bottom of the
ranking on the relevant indicator.

Economies that improved the most across 3 or more
Doing Business topics in 2011/12

The ease of doing business index is limited in scope. It
does not account for an economy’s proximity to large
markets, the quality of its infrastructure services (other
than services related to trading across borders and
getting electricity), the strength of its financial system,
the security of property from theft and looting,
macroeconomic conditions or the strength of
underlying institutions.
Variability of economies’ rankings across topics
Each indicator set measures a different aspect of the
business regulatory environment. The rankings of an
economy can vary, sometimes significantly, across
indicator sets. The average correlation coefficient
between the 10 indicator sets included in the
aggregate ranking is 0.37, and the coefficients
between any 2 sets of indicators range from 0.19
(between dealing with construction permits and
getting credit) to 0.60 (between starting a business
and protecting investors). These correlations suggest
that economies rarely score universally well or
universally badly on the indicators.
Consider the example of Canada. It stands at 17 in the
aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business. Its
ranking is 3 on starting a business, and 4 on both
resolving insolvency and protecting investors. But its
ranking is only 62 on enforcing contracts, 69 on
dealing with construction permits and 152 on getting
electricity.
Variation in performance across the indicator sets is
not at all unusual. It reflects differences in the degree
of priority that government authorities give to
particular areas of business regulation reform and the

5

A technical note on the different aggregation and weighting
methods is available on the Doing Business website

Doing Business 2013 uses a simple method to calculate
which economies improved the most in the ease of
doing business. First, it selects the economies that in
2011/12 implemented regulatory reforms making it
easier to do business in 3 or more of the 10 topics
6
included in this year’s ease of doing business ranking.
Twenty-three economies meet this criterion: Benin,
Burundi, Costa Rica, the Czech Republic, Georgia,
Greece, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Korea, the Lao People’s
Democratic
Republic,
Liberia,
Mongolia,
the
Netherlands, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, the
Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, the
United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan. Second, Doing
Business ranks these economies on the increase in
their ranking on the ease of doing business from the
previous year using comparable rankings.
Selecting the economies that implemented regulatory
reforms in at least 3 topics and improved the most in
the aggregate ranking is intended to highlight
economies with ongoing, broad-based reform
programs.
Distance to frontier measure
A drawback of the ease of doing business ranking is
that it can measure the regulatory performance of
economies only relative to the performance of others.
It does not provide information on how the absolute
quality of the regulatory environment is improving
over time. Nor does it provide information on how
large the gaps are between economies at a single
point in time.
The distance to frontier measure is designed to
address both shortcomings, complementing the ease
of doing business ranking. This measure illustrates the
distance of an economy to the “frontier,” and the
change in the measure over time shows the extent to
which the economy has closed this gap. The frontier is
a score derived from the most efficient practice or
highest score achieved on each of the component
indicators in 9 Doing Business indicator sets (excluding
6

Doing Business reforms making it more difficult to do business are
subtracted from the total number of those making it easier to do
business.

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

the employing workers and getting electricity
indicators) by any economy since 2005. In starting a
business, for example, New Zealand has achieved the
highest performance on the time (1 day), Canada and
New Zealand on the number of procedures required
(1), Slovenia on the cost (0% of income per capita) and
Australia and 90 other economies on the paid-in
minimum capital requirement (0% of income per
capita). Calculating the distance to frontier for each
economy involves 2 main steps. First, individual
indicator scores are normalized to a common unit:
except for the total tax rate. To do so, each of the 28
component indicators y is rescaled to (max − y)/(max
− min), with the minimum value (min) representing the
frontier—the highest performance on that indicator
across all economies since 2005. For the total tax rate,
consistent with the calculation of the rankings, the
frontier is defined as the total tax rate corresponding
th
to the 15 percentile based on the overall distribution
of total tax rates for all years. Second, for each
economy the scores obtained for individual indicators
are aggregated through simple averaging into one
distance to frontier score. An economy’s distance to
frontier is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0
represents the lowest performance and 100 the
frontier.
The difference between an economy’s distance to
frontier score in 2005 and its score in 2012 illustrates
the extent to which the economy has closed the gap to
the frontier over time. And in any given year the score
measures how far an economy is from the highest
performance at that time.

110

The maximum (max) and minimum (min) observed
values are computed for the 174 economies included
in the Doing Business sample since 2005 and for all
years (from 2005 to 2012). The year 2005 was chosen
as the baseline for the economy sample because it was
the first year in which data were available for the
majority of economies (a total of 174) and for all 9
indicator sets included in the measure. To mitigate the
effects of extreme outliers in the distributions of the
rescaled data (very few economies need 694 days to
complete the procedures to start a business, but many
th
need 9 days), the maximum (max) is defined as the 95
percentile of the pooled data for all economies and all
years for each indicator. The exceptions are the getting
credit, protecting investors and resolving insolvency
indicators, whose construction precludes outliers.
Take Ghana, which has a score of 67 on the distance to
frontier measure for 2012. This score indicates that the
economy is 33 percentage points away from the
frontier constructed from the best performances
across all economies and all years. Ghana was further
from the frontier in 2005, with a score of 54. The
difference between the scores shows an improvement
over time.
The distance to frontier measure can also be used for
comparisons across economies in the same year,
complementing the ease of doing business ranking.
For example, Ghana stands at 64 this year in the ease
of doing business ranking, while Peru, which is 29
percentage points from the frontier, stands at 43.

Doing Business 2013

111

Mongolia

RESOURCES ON THE DOING BUSINESS WEBSITE
Current features
News on the Doing Business project
http://www.doingbusiness.org
Rankings
How economies rank—from 1 to 185
http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings/
Data
All the data for 185 economies—topic rankings,
indicator values, lists of regulatory procedures and
details underlying indicators
http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/
Reports
Access to Doing Business reports as well as
subnational and regional reports, reform case
studies and customized economy and regional
profiles
http://www.doingbusiness.org/reports/
Methodology
The methodologies and research papers
underlying Doing Business
http://www.doingbusiness.org/methodology/
Research
Abstracts of papers on Doing Business topics and
related policy issues
http://www.doingbusiness.org/research/

Doing Business reforms
Short summaries of DB2013 business regulation
reforms, lists of reforms since DB2008 and a
ranking simulation tool
http://www.doingbusiness.org/reforms/
Historical data
Customized data sets since DB2004
http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query/
Law library
Online collection of business laws and regulations
relating to business and gender issues
http://www.doingbusiness.org/law-library/
http://wbl.worldbank.org/
Contributors
More than 9,600 specialists in 185 economies who
participate in Doing Business
http://www.doingbusiness.org/contributors/doingbusiness/
NEW! Entrepreneurship data
Data on business density for 130 economies
http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/e
ntrepreneurship
More to come
Coming soon—information on good practices and
data on transparency and on the distance to
frontier

Doing Business 2013

Mongolia

112

Economy Profile: Doing business 2013

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Economy Profile: Doing business 2013

More from Mr Nyak

Recently uploaded

Economy Profile: Doing business 2013