Channel Plan Forms/Pattern
• Straight Channel
– Water moves parallel to the channel banks
– Sinuosity varies from 1 – 1.05
• Meandering Channel
– Follow the sinuous path
• Braided Channel
– Channels flows in more than one sub-channels, because
the natural topography does not match the hydraulics
conditions of a river.
Sinuosity
• The meander ratio or sinuosity index is the ratio of actual
length along a meandering river (Lm) to the straight
distance S between the end points (AB).
• It is an indication of quantification of meandering.
• For a straight river course this ratio is equal to unity. A
ratio varying from 1 to 1.5 defines the river course as
sinuous and from 1.5 to 4 as meandering.
Geometric features of meander
Meande
r Belt
Straight Channel
Meandering Channel
Braided Channel
Earthen Channel Design
Introduction
• The efficiency of the canal design has a bearing on its working
• The canal efficiency suffers from silting and scouring of the canal
due to faulty design necessitating heavy maintenance and at time
even remodeling if the original design is past redemption.
• The other worse problems whose origin lies in faulty design are;
weed growth infection, heavy seepage losses entitling development
of water-logging alongside the canal.
Introduction
• Canal design also depend on:
soil formation,
sediment transport characteristics,
operational needs and
desired standards of maintenance
• Usually irrigation canals are constructed in alluvial soils and the supplies
are essentially from river and carry silt.
• The sediment passed on into the off-taking channel of low velocity,
deposits in the canal bed resulting in silting up and consequently causing
loss of discharge carrying capacity necessitating frequent silt clearing.
• On the other hand a high velocity in channel cause erosion/scouring
thereby lowering Full Supply Level resulting in loss of command.
Types of Canal Sections
• There are two types of canals sections
– Unlined channels, most of our main irrigation canals are
unlined/earthen canals which cause seepage and result in losses and
raising in the W/T of the adjoining area.
– Lined channels, lined with RC, PCC, Bricks, Stones etc, to minimize the
seepage losses and increase the efficiency of the system.
• Recently irrigation canals are built with lining
Factors affecting the Design of Canals
• Main factors:
– Water discharge, Q
– Sediment Discharge, Qs
– Sediment size, d
– Slope of canal
– Bed width, depth and velocity
Factors affecting the Design of Canals
• Secondary factors:
– Acceleration due to gravity, g
– Shear stress
– Viscosity
– Temperature
– Sediment density etc.
Design of irrigation canals
• It is the process to obtain a cross-section, slope and geometry of
channel/canal which should not have objectionable siltation and
scouring.
– Determining (1) depth, (2) bed width, (3) side slope and (4)
longitudinal slope of the channel so as to produce a non-silting
and non-scouring velocity for the given discharge and sediment
load.
Approaches used for Design of Earthen
Canals
• Empirical
• Semi empirical
• Rational
Empirical Approaches
Empirical Approaches (Regime Theories):
• These methods are based on those canals which were working
reasonably well and they were not having any objectionable silting
and scouring and having stable cross-sections. These channels were
fulfilling the requirements to carry designed water and silt
discharge.
• These theories are not dimensionally homogenous and do not
follow any laws or theories.
Concept of Channel in Regime
• Channel in Regime (Stable Channel)
– Lindley (1919): When an artificial channel is constructed in
alluvium to carry silty water, its bed and banks would silt or
scour until the depth, slope and width attain a state of balance,
to which he designated as channel in regime.
– Lane (1953) defined stable channel as
• Which carries water
• The banks and bed of which are not scoured objectionably by
moving water and
• In which objectionable deposit of sediment do not occur.

Eearthen channel design

  • 1.
    Channel Plan Forms/Pattern •Straight Channel – Water moves parallel to the channel banks – Sinuosity varies from 1 – 1.05 • Meandering Channel – Follow the sinuous path • Braided Channel – Channels flows in more than one sub-channels, because the natural topography does not match the hydraulics conditions of a river.
  • 2.
    Sinuosity • The meanderratio or sinuosity index is the ratio of actual length along a meandering river (Lm) to the straight distance S between the end points (AB). • It is an indication of quantification of meandering. • For a straight river course this ratio is equal to unity. A ratio varying from 1 to 1.5 defines the river course as sinuous and from 1.5 to 4 as meandering.
  • 3.
    Geometric features ofmeander Meande r Belt
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Introduction • The efficiencyof the canal design has a bearing on its working • The canal efficiency suffers from silting and scouring of the canal due to faulty design necessitating heavy maintenance and at time even remodeling if the original design is past redemption. • The other worse problems whose origin lies in faulty design are; weed growth infection, heavy seepage losses entitling development of water-logging alongside the canal.
  • 9.
    Introduction • Canal designalso depend on: soil formation, sediment transport characteristics, operational needs and desired standards of maintenance • Usually irrigation canals are constructed in alluvial soils and the supplies are essentially from river and carry silt. • The sediment passed on into the off-taking channel of low velocity, deposits in the canal bed resulting in silting up and consequently causing loss of discharge carrying capacity necessitating frequent silt clearing. • On the other hand a high velocity in channel cause erosion/scouring thereby lowering Full Supply Level resulting in loss of command.
  • 10.
    Types of CanalSections • There are two types of canals sections – Unlined channels, most of our main irrigation canals are unlined/earthen canals which cause seepage and result in losses and raising in the W/T of the adjoining area. – Lined channels, lined with RC, PCC, Bricks, Stones etc, to minimize the seepage losses and increase the efficiency of the system. • Recently irrigation canals are built with lining
  • 11.
    Factors affecting theDesign of Canals • Main factors: – Water discharge, Q – Sediment Discharge, Qs – Sediment size, d – Slope of canal – Bed width, depth and velocity
  • 12.
    Factors affecting theDesign of Canals • Secondary factors: – Acceleration due to gravity, g – Shear stress – Viscosity – Temperature – Sediment density etc.
  • 13.
    Design of irrigationcanals • It is the process to obtain a cross-section, slope and geometry of channel/canal which should not have objectionable siltation and scouring. – Determining (1) depth, (2) bed width, (3) side slope and (4) longitudinal slope of the channel so as to produce a non-silting and non-scouring velocity for the given discharge and sediment load.
  • 14.
    Approaches used forDesign of Earthen Canals • Empirical • Semi empirical • Rational
  • 15.
    Empirical Approaches Empirical Approaches(Regime Theories): • These methods are based on those canals which were working reasonably well and they were not having any objectionable silting and scouring and having stable cross-sections. These channels were fulfilling the requirements to carry designed water and silt discharge. • These theories are not dimensionally homogenous and do not follow any laws or theories.
  • 16.
    Concept of Channelin Regime • Channel in Regime (Stable Channel) – Lindley (1919): When an artificial channel is constructed in alluvium to carry silty water, its bed and banks would silt or scour until the depth, slope and width attain a state of balance, to which he designated as channel in regime. – Lane (1953) defined stable channel as • Which carries water • The banks and bed of which are not scoured objectionably by moving water and • In which objectionable deposit of sediment do not occur.