EFFECT OF ANESTHETIC AGENTS
ON CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY
ZIKRULLAH
CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE: (CPP)
 CPP = difference b/w mean arterial pressure
(MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) or central
venous pressure (CVP) , whichever is greater.
 MAP – ICP (or CVP) = CPP
 Normally CPP = 80- 100 mm Hg
 ICP normally is ≤ 10 mm Hg, so , CPP depends
primarily on MAP
CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE: (CPP)
 Moderate to severe ↑ ICP (≥ 30 mm Hg) - impairs
CPP and CBF even in presence of normal MAP.
 CPP ≤ 50 mm Hg – slowing on EEG
 CPP 25 - 40 mm Hg – flat EEG
 CPP ≤ 25 mm Hg – irreversible brain damage
SOME FACTS…….
 Adult human brain weighs approx : 1350 gm
about 2% of body weight
 Cranial vault – rigid structure with a fixed total volume
Brain Tissue (80 %)
Blood (12%)
CSF (8%)
 Receives 12-15% of cardiac output
Reflects brain’s high metabolic rate
Intracranial compliance
• increase in volume are initially well
compensated.
• Later a point is eventually reached, at
which precipitous rises in ICP occurs.
Importance of the effect of anaesthetic
drugs on ICP
• Most of the neurosurgery cases have ↑ ICP.
• Various compensatory mechanisms are
exhausted.
• Small change in cerebral volume produces large
change in ICP.
Features of raised ICP
• Headache
• Vomiting
• Visual disturbance
• Decreased cognition
• Bradycardia
• Hypertension
• Irregular respiration
• unconsciousness
• Coma
CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW:
 Varies with metabolic activity
 CBF can vary from 10 -300ml/100 g/min
 Total CBF: on an average 50 ml/100g/min OR
750ml/min
Approx 15% of total cardiac output
Gray matter: 80ml/100g/min
White matter:20ml/100g/min
 CBF < 20 – 25 ml/100 g/min - cognitive impairment
 CBF < 15 – 20 ml/100 g/min - isoelectric EEG
 CBF < 1o ml/100 g/min – irreversible brain damage
FACTORS EFFECTING CBF:
1. Chemical/ metabolic/ humoral:
1. CMR – depends on :anesthetic agents
temperature & seizures
2. PaCO₂
3. PaO₂
4. Vasoactive drugs: vasopressors & vasodilators
2. Myogenic :
1. Autoregulation/ MAP
3. Rheologic: blood viscosity
4. Neurogenic
CEREBRAL METABOLISM:
 Normally brain consumes- 20% of total body O₂
60% - to support neuronal activity
to generate ATP’S
 Cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) measured in terms of
O₂ consumption (CMRO₂)
Approx 3- 3.8mL/100g/min OR 50mL/min
Greatest in gray matter of cerebral cotrex
CEREBRAL METABOLISM:
 high O₂ consumption & absence of significant O₂ reserves
So, interrurption of perfusion → unconsciousness
within 10 sec (as O₂ tension falls below 30 mm hg)
 Within 3-8 min: (if blood supply not re- established)
ATP stores deplete
Irreversible cellular injury begins to occur
 HIPPOCAMPUS
 CEREBELLUM most sensitive to hypoxic injury
AUTOREGULATION:
 Normally, brain tolerates wide swings in BP
 Cerebral vasculature adapts rapidly (10-60 sec) to change in
CPP.
 But , abrupt changes in MAP, even with intact autoregulation,
lead to transient changes in CBF.
↓ CPP- cerebral vasodilation
↑ CPP- cerebral vasoconstriction
 CBF nearly remains constant b/w MAP of about 60- 160 mm
Hg
beyond these limits, CBF becomes pressure dependent
MAP ↑ 150-160 mm Hg – disruption of BBB & cerebral
edema
AUTOREGULATION:
RESPIRATORY GAS TENSIONS:
 Most imp. extrinsic influences on CBF – esp. PaCO₂
 CBF directly propotional to PaCO₂ b/w tensions of 20-80
mm Hg
 CBF changes 1-2 ml/100g/min/mmHg change in PaCO2.
 Change occurs very quickly – almost immediate
Results from CO₂ readily crossing BBB
Acute changes in PaCO₂, but not HCO3,⁻affect CBF
So, acute metabolic acidosis- little effect on CBF
 Chronic Changes (24 – 48 hrs) offset by HCO3⁻ in CSF.
CSF:
 21ml/hr or 500 ml/day
 Total volume 150ml
 CSF turnover 4-5 hrs
 CSF formation is independent of ICP
 CSF absorbtion is directly proportional to ICP and
inversely proportional to venous pressure
EFFECT OF ANESTHETIC AGENTS
ON CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY
 Anesthetic drugs cause dose-related and reversible
alterations in many aspects of cerebral physiology,
including CBF, cerebral metabolic rate (CMR), and
electrophysiologic function.
 The effects of anesthetic drugs and techniques
have the potential to adversely affect the diseased
brain and conduct of the neurosurgical procedure
and are thus of clinical importance in patients with
neurosurgical disease.
 The effects of general anesthesia on CBF and CMR
can be manipulated to improve both the operative
course and the clinical outcome of patients with
neurologic disorders.
INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS:
INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS:
 Generally, CMRO₂ and CBF decrease
KETAMINE is an exception.
 Changes in CBF generally parallel those in CMR
 Cerebral autoregulation and CO₂ responsivenes-
preserved with all agents
 Increasing plasma concentrations cause progressive
suppression of EEG activity and a concomitant reduction
in CMR.
 Increasing the plasma level beyond what is required to
first achieve suppression of the EEG results in no further
depression of CMR.
 The component of CMR required for maintenance of
cellular integrity, the “housekeeping” component, is
unaltered by intravenous anesthetic drugs
BARBITURATES:
4 major actions on CNS:
Hypnosis
Depression of CMR
↓ CBF, due to ↑ cerebral vascular resistance
Anticonvulsant activity
make thiopental ‘the most commonly used’ induction
agent in neuroanesthesia
Dose dependent reduction in CBF& CMR, until EEG
becomes isoelectric
max. reduction of nearly 50% is observed
BARBITURATES:
 CMR reduction is uniform – throughout the whole brain
 CMR decreased more than CBF
So, supply exceeds demand
 barbiturate induced cerebral vasoconstriction occurs
only in normal areas
Vasculature in ischemic areas remain maximally
dilated & unaffected by barbiturates
 Net result is : redistribution of blood flow
From normal to ischemic areas
Called as – ROBIN HOOD or REVERSE STEAL
phenomenon
 Facilitate CSF absorption
 Highly effective in lowering ICP
 Autoregulation is maintained
 CO2 responsiveness also persists.
 Other possible actions:
Blockade of sodium channels
↓ intracellular calcium influx
Decrease ATP consumption
Scavenging/ suppression of free radical formation
Retardation of cerebral edema
 Acc. To studies:
Effective in preventing brain injury during focal ,
but not, global ischemia
ABOUT METHOHEXITAL…
 Myoclonic activity
 Pts with seizures of temporal lobe- specifically at risk
Small doses activate seizure foci
Higher doses- anticonvulsant like thiopental
 Used to activate seizure foci during cortical mapping
 Myoclonic activity
 Pts with seizures of temporal lobe- specifically at risk
Small doses activate seizure foci
Higher doses- anticonvulsant like thiopental
 Used to activate seizure foci during cortical mapping
PROPOFOL:
 Effects on CBF and CMR are quite similar to those of
barbiturates.
 Reduce CMR  vasoconstriction decrease CBF & ICP
 Fentanyl + propofol  ablates increase in ICP at
intubation
 CO2 responsiveness preserved
 Autoregulation preserved
 Short elimination half life
 Excessive hypotension & cardiac depression – in
elderly/ unstable pts can compromise CPP
PROPOFOL AND SEIZURE INCIDENCE:
 dystonic & choriform movements, opisthotonus etc have
been reported with its use,
SYSTEMATIC STUDIES FAILED TO CONFIRM THAT
PROPOFOL IS PROCONVULSANT
 Appears to be anticonvulsant in animals
PROPOFOL & BRAIN PROTECTION:
ETOMIDATE :
 Parallel reductions in CBF, CMR & ICP
 Effect on CMR variable: more in cortex than brainstem
May be responsible for greater hemodynamic stability
in unstable pts.
 ↓ CSF production & ↑ absorption
Concerns …………
ADRENOCORTICAL
SUPPRESSION
ETOMIDATE :
 High incidence of myoclonic movements
 May precipitate generalized epileptic EEG activity in
epileptic patients..avoided here
 Activate seizure foci and low doses used for intra op EEG
localization
 When used in ECT longer seizures compared to
Thiopentone and Propofol
 But used in refractory status epilepticus
OPIOIDS:
 In general, little effects in normal brain
 When occur, modest reduction in CBF& CMR, unless
PaCO₂ ↑ 2° to respiratory depression
 Morphine, generally not considered optimal, due to poor
lipid solubility and prolonged sedation
FENTANYL & ALFENTANYL:
 FENTANYL
modest reduction CBF & CMR in
quiescent brain
Larger reduction during arousal
 ALFENTANYL
 No significant changes
Small doses <50 mg/kg) can activate
seizure foci in pts with epilepsy
SUFENTANYL :
 Either reduction or no change in CMR&CBF
 But sometimes in pts with intracranial tumors:
 Sudden precipitous fall in MAP  decrease
in CPP  autoregulation small increase in
ICP
 So be cautious…..
REMIFENTANYL:
 Low sedative doses cause minor increase in
CBF
 Along with other anesthetics / higher doses 
modest reduction or no change in CBF
BENZODIAZEPINES:
 Modest reduction in CBF
 The reduction attained is intermediate b/w that
caused by
opioids (modest)
barbiturates (substantial)
 Midazolam preferred- short half life
 Useful as anticonvulsant also
 Remember they can produce
respiratory depression increase in paCO2
 If we avoid this… BENZODIAZEPINES
appear safe
DROPERIDOL:
 Little or no effect on CMR
 minimally reduces CBF
 Can cause abrupt fall in MAP vasodilation increase in
ICP (occasional)
 When used with opioids as part of neuroleptic technique-
may cause prolonged sedation – UNDESIRABLE
KETAMINE:
 Only IV agent to cause VASODILATAION ↑CBF
(50-60%)
 Effect is regionally variable
limbic system & reticular formation are activated
Somatosensory & auditory areas are depressed
Total CMR doesn’t change
 Seizure activity in thalamus and limbic area.
KETAMINE:
 May impede absorption of CSF
↑CBF, CBV & CSF volume : ↑ ICP (potentially)
 Better to avoid as sole agent…
 Diazepam , Midazolam ,Isoflurane /N2O, Propofol
…. They blunt its effects
 Reasonable to use it along with the above drugs…
cautiously
LIDOCAINE:
 Reduce CMR, CBF & ICP, but to a lesser degree
 Decreses CBF without other major hemodynamic
effects
 membrane stabilizing effect of lignocaine also
reduces energy needs for membrane integrity
 Rx & prevention of acute rise in ICP, also during
laryngoscopy , intubation & ETT suctioning
 Risk of systemic toxicity and seizures – limit the
usefulness of repeated dosing
INHALED ANAESTHETICS:
VOLATILE AGENTS….
Reduce CMR
• .
Cerebral vasodilation
augment CBF
• .
VOLATILE AGENTS & CMR:
 ↓ CMR- dose dependent
 Max depression – isoflurane (about 50%)
 Least effect – halothane (less than 25%)
 No further decrease in reduction in CMR is observed once
EEG is isoelectric. (Unlike hypothermia)
 Reduction in CMR – not uniform
Mainly in neocortex
VOLATILE AGENTS & CBF:
 Dilate blood vessels & impair auto regulation - in a dose
dependent manner
 Greatest effect – halothane
Conc >1%- nearly abolishes auto regulation
Blood flow increase - generalized throughout brain
At equivalent MAC – halothane ↑ CBF 200%, compared
to 20% for isoflurane.
 Isoflurane increases blood flow mainly in subcortical ares &
hindbrain (unlike halothane)
 Qualitatively & quantitatively – des/sevoflurane closest to
isoflurane
EFFECTS @ DIFFERENT MACs:
D o s e b e y o n d 1 M A C
CMR reduced; but vasodilatory
effect predominates
CBF increases
@ 1 M A C
CMR suppression = vasodilation CBF unchanged
@ 0 . 5 M A C
CMR suppression predominates So net CBF decreases
VOLATILE AGENTS:
 The vasodilator effect usually appear rapidly than the
effects on CMR.
 The CBF also appears to be time dependent
Returns to almost normal after continued admn (2-5
hrs)
 If antecedent lowering of CMR by drugs/disease, then
vasodilator effect may predominate
 ↑ in CBV (10-12%) generally parallels CBF
But relation is not necessarily linear
VOLATILE AGENTS & PaCO₂:
 CO2 responsiveness of vasculature - preserved
Hyperventilation can therfore abolish/blunt the effects on
CBF
Timing is important
Effect is observed only if hyperventilation is initiated prior
to admn of halothane
In contrast, simultaneous hyperventilation with
iso/sevoflurane- can prevent ↑ in ICP
 Hypocapnia most effective during isoflurane admn.
HALOTHANE:
 CBF  dramatic increase in CBF with a
simultaneous modest reduction in CMR
 CMR suppression is less compared to other agents
↓ CMR with ↑CBF- termed as luxury perfusion
may be desirable during induced hypotension
Beneficial during global ischemia
HALOTHANE:
 Circulatory steal phenomenon:
In setting of focal ischemia, ↑CBF in normal
areas of but not in ischemic areas- where
arterioles are already maximally vasodilated
End result- redistribution of blood away from
ischemic areas
ENFLURANE
 CBF dramatic increase in CBF with a simultaneous
modest reduction in CMR
 Potentially epileptogenic
hypocapnea potentiates this effect
 Seizure activity elevate brain metabolism by as much as
400%
 Will you prefer?
So avoid: if seizure predisposition
ISOFLURANE:
 CBF increases CBF; but to a lesser extent
20% (halothane increases by 200%)
 CMR decreases CMRO₂
maximal reduction is attained simultaneously with EEG
suppression (at clinically relevant 1.5-2.0 MAC)
1 MAC decrease CMRO2 by 25%
Max depression upto 50%
 Distribution of CBF/CMR changes:
CBF increases are greater in subcortical and hindbrain
areas than neocortex
CMR suppression is greater in the neocortex than
subcortex
 Isoflurane facilitates absorption and is the only volatile
agent with favorable effects on CSF dynamics.
 Institution of hyperventilation :
Simultaneous, with its introduction can prevent increase
in ICP
SEVOFLURANE:
 Reduce CBF
 Reduce CMRO2
by 38% at 1 MAC
Max at EEG suppression at 1.5-2.0 MAC
 Distribution in CBF
Reduction in cortex
Increase in cerebellum
 Has small potential to evoke epileptiform activity
use with caution in patients with epilepsy
DESFLURANE:
 Reduce CBF
 Decrease CMRO2 by 22% @ 1 MAC
 In general:
the effect of Isoflurane , Desflurane and Sevoflurane
on CBF are modest
SUMMARY OF VOLATILE AGENTS:
MAJOR IMPACT ON CBF/CBV & ICP OCCURS WHEN > 1 MAC
BECOMES SIGNIFICANT IF - INTRACRANIAL COMPLIANCE IS
ABNORMAL
HERE, BETTER TO USE A MAINLY IV TECHNIQUE – UNTIL OPENING
OF CRANIUM & DURA
NET VASODILATORY EFFECT OF ISO/DES & SEVO <HALOTHANE- SO
PREFER THE FORMER
ENFLURANE IS EPILEPTOGENIC & SLIGHT RISK WITH
SEVOFLURANE
CO2 REACTIVITY PRESERVED
NITROUS OXIDE:
 When given alone: increase in CBF,CMR & ICP
(sympathoadrenal stimulating effect)
 Effects easily overcome by other agents or
CO2
 With IV agents: effect on CBF considerably reduced
 With Volatile Agents: CBF increase is exaggerated
NITROUS OXIDE:
 Vasodilator effect clinically significant in those with abnormal
intracranial compliance
 so add IV agents
 Surgical field persistently “tight”?
N2O may be a culprit????
 should be avoided in cases, where a closed intracranial gas
space may exist
it can enter and expand it
NITROUS OXIDE:
 CBF response to CO2 preserved
 No uniform agreement reached on its
effect on CMR
MUSCLE RELAXANTS:
NON DEPOLARIZING RELAXANTS:
 Lack direct action, but have 2° effects
 Main effect is via Histamine release
Cerebral vasodilation
increase ICP
 Simultaneous ↓in systemic BP
histamine/ganglion blockade
↓ CPP
NON DEPOLARIZING RELAXANTS-
HISTAMINE RELEASE
Cisatracurium:
Least
Also :metocurine
atracurium
mivacurium
D-tubocurarine
NDMR:
 Pancuronium- large bolus : abrupt increase in
BP
if autoregulation defective - increase ICP
 metabolite of atracurium- Laudanosine:
 epileptogenic properties in trials
But” it appears highly unlikely that
epileptogenesis will occur in humans with
atracurium”
MESSAGE…. NDMR USE:
 All are reasonable in I.C. hypertension
 Avoid hypotension:
Metocurine/Atracurium/Mivacurium
 Anticonvulsant drug decrease the effect of NDMR
SUCCINYLCHOLINE:
 Increases ICP in lightly anaesthetized- small and
transient.
Possibly result of cerebral activation
Enhanced muscle spindle activity- Increases
metabolic rate and thus CBF
 Prevention by:
Adequate dose of inducing agent- deep plane
Institute hyperventilation at induction
Defasciculating dose of non depolarizing NMBA
 With normal autoregulation & intact BBB
 CBF↑, only when MAP <50-60 mmHg or >150-
160 mm Hg
 CMR generally parallels changes in CBF
 Excessive elevation in BP can disrupt BBB
VASOPRESSORS:
VASODILATORS:
 In absence of hypotension:
 cause cerebral vasodilation and ↑CBF in a dose
related fashion
 When the ↓ syetemic BP:
CBF either maintained or increases
Can significantly raise ICP in pt with ↓ intracranial
compliance
VASODILATORS:
 Sodium nitroprusside is a direct-acting smooth
muscle relaxant that produces arteriolar and
venous dilatation, acts as cerebral vasodilator
 Cerebral blood volume is increased and ICP may
be elevated.
 It is best avoided if ICP is high.
VASODILATORS:
 Nitroglycerin is primarily a venodilator and coronary
vasodilator
 It acts by relaxing smooth muscle and works on the
intracerebral venous capacitance vessels.
 It increases cerebral blood volume and may
increase ICP
VASODILATORS:
 Propofol, lidocaine or labetalol should be preferred
instead.
 Labetalol, a mixed α- and β- blocker, lowers MAP
by lowering systemic vascular resistance and
depressing cardiac output.
 It has no direct effect on cerebral blood vessels.
VASODILATORS:
 Only trimethaphan has no or little effect on CBF
But it constricts pupils
May interfere with neurological examination
No longer available in USA
REFERENCES
MILLER’S ANESTHESIA,6/e
ANESTHESIA &COEXISTING
DISEASE,4e
WYLIE & CHURCHILL DAVIDSONS’
APRACTICE OF ANESTHESIA
TEXTBOOK OF NEUROANESTHESIA
AND CRITICAL CARE Basil F. Matta,
David K. Menon, John M. Turner
THANKYOU…

Effects of anesthetics on cerebral blood flow

  • 1.
    EFFECT OF ANESTHETICAGENTS ON CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY ZIKRULLAH
  • 2.
    CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE:(CPP)  CPP = difference b/w mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) or central venous pressure (CVP) , whichever is greater.  MAP – ICP (or CVP) = CPP  Normally CPP = 80- 100 mm Hg  ICP normally is ≤ 10 mm Hg, so , CPP depends primarily on MAP
  • 3.
    CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE:(CPP)  Moderate to severe ↑ ICP (≥ 30 mm Hg) - impairs CPP and CBF even in presence of normal MAP.  CPP ≤ 50 mm Hg – slowing on EEG  CPP 25 - 40 mm Hg – flat EEG  CPP ≤ 25 mm Hg – irreversible brain damage
  • 4.
    SOME FACTS…….  Adulthuman brain weighs approx : 1350 gm about 2% of body weight  Cranial vault – rigid structure with a fixed total volume Brain Tissue (80 %) Blood (12%) CSF (8%)  Receives 12-15% of cardiac output Reflects brain’s high metabolic rate
  • 5.
    Intracranial compliance • increasein volume are initially well compensated. • Later a point is eventually reached, at which precipitous rises in ICP occurs.
  • 7.
    Importance of theeffect of anaesthetic drugs on ICP • Most of the neurosurgery cases have ↑ ICP. • Various compensatory mechanisms are exhausted. • Small change in cerebral volume produces large change in ICP.
  • 8.
    Features of raisedICP • Headache • Vomiting • Visual disturbance • Decreased cognition • Bradycardia • Hypertension • Irregular respiration • unconsciousness • Coma
  • 9.
    CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW: Varies with metabolic activity  CBF can vary from 10 -300ml/100 g/min  Total CBF: on an average 50 ml/100g/min OR 750ml/min Approx 15% of total cardiac output Gray matter: 80ml/100g/min White matter:20ml/100g/min  CBF < 20 – 25 ml/100 g/min - cognitive impairment  CBF < 15 – 20 ml/100 g/min - isoelectric EEG  CBF < 1o ml/100 g/min – irreversible brain damage
  • 10.
    FACTORS EFFECTING CBF: 1.Chemical/ metabolic/ humoral: 1. CMR – depends on :anesthetic agents temperature & seizures 2. PaCO₂ 3. PaO₂ 4. Vasoactive drugs: vasopressors & vasodilators 2. Myogenic : 1. Autoregulation/ MAP 3. Rheologic: blood viscosity 4. Neurogenic
  • 11.
    CEREBRAL METABOLISM:  Normallybrain consumes- 20% of total body O₂ 60% - to support neuronal activity to generate ATP’S  Cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) measured in terms of O₂ consumption (CMRO₂) Approx 3- 3.8mL/100g/min OR 50mL/min Greatest in gray matter of cerebral cotrex
  • 12.
    CEREBRAL METABOLISM:  highO₂ consumption & absence of significant O₂ reserves So, interrurption of perfusion → unconsciousness within 10 sec (as O₂ tension falls below 30 mm hg)  Within 3-8 min: (if blood supply not re- established) ATP stores deplete Irreversible cellular injury begins to occur  HIPPOCAMPUS  CEREBELLUM most sensitive to hypoxic injury
  • 13.
    AUTOREGULATION:  Normally, braintolerates wide swings in BP  Cerebral vasculature adapts rapidly (10-60 sec) to change in CPP.  But , abrupt changes in MAP, even with intact autoregulation, lead to transient changes in CBF. ↓ CPP- cerebral vasodilation ↑ CPP- cerebral vasoconstriction  CBF nearly remains constant b/w MAP of about 60- 160 mm Hg beyond these limits, CBF becomes pressure dependent MAP ↑ 150-160 mm Hg – disruption of BBB & cerebral edema
  • 14.
  • 15.
    RESPIRATORY GAS TENSIONS: Most imp. extrinsic influences on CBF – esp. PaCO₂  CBF directly propotional to PaCO₂ b/w tensions of 20-80 mm Hg  CBF changes 1-2 ml/100g/min/mmHg change in PaCO2.  Change occurs very quickly – almost immediate Results from CO₂ readily crossing BBB Acute changes in PaCO₂, but not HCO3,⁻affect CBF So, acute metabolic acidosis- little effect on CBF  Chronic Changes (24 – 48 hrs) offset by HCO3⁻ in CSF.
  • 17.
    CSF:  21ml/hr or500 ml/day  Total volume 150ml  CSF turnover 4-5 hrs  CSF formation is independent of ICP  CSF absorbtion is directly proportional to ICP and inversely proportional to venous pressure
  • 18.
    EFFECT OF ANESTHETICAGENTS ON CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY
  • 19.
     Anesthetic drugscause dose-related and reversible alterations in many aspects of cerebral physiology, including CBF, cerebral metabolic rate (CMR), and electrophysiologic function.  The effects of anesthetic drugs and techniques have the potential to adversely affect the diseased brain and conduct of the neurosurgical procedure and are thus of clinical importance in patients with neurosurgical disease.
  • 20.
     The effectsof general anesthesia on CBF and CMR can be manipulated to improve both the operative course and the clinical outcome of patients with neurologic disorders.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS:  Generally,CMRO₂ and CBF decrease KETAMINE is an exception.  Changes in CBF generally parallel those in CMR  Cerebral autoregulation and CO₂ responsivenes- preserved with all agents
  • 23.
     Increasing plasmaconcentrations cause progressive suppression of EEG activity and a concomitant reduction in CMR.  Increasing the plasma level beyond what is required to first achieve suppression of the EEG results in no further depression of CMR.  The component of CMR required for maintenance of cellular integrity, the “housekeeping” component, is unaltered by intravenous anesthetic drugs
  • 25.
    BARBITURATES: 4 major actionson CNS: Hypnosis Depression of CMR ↓ CBF, due to ↑ cerebral vascular resistance Anticonvulsant activity make thiopental ‘the most commonly used’ induction agent in neuroanesthesia Dose dependent reduction in CBF& CMR, until EEG becomes isoelectric max. reduction of nearly 50% is observed
  • 26.
    BARBITURATES:  CMR reductionis uniform – throughout the whole brain  CMR decreased more than CBF So, supply exceeds demand  barbiturate induced cerebral vasoconstriction occurs only in normal areas Vasculature in ischemic areas remain maximally dilated & unaffected by barbiturates  Net result is : redistribution of blood flow From normal to ischemic areas Called as – ROBIN HOOD or REVERSE STEAL phenomenon
  • 27.
     Facilitate CSFabsorption  Highly effective in lowering ICP  Autoregulation is maintained  CO2 responsiveness also persists.  Other possible actions: Blockade of sodium channels ↓ intracellular calcium influx Decrease ATP consumption Scavenging/ suppression of free radical formation Retardation of cerebral edema  Acc. To studies: Effective in preventing brain injury during focal , but not, global ischemia
  • 28.
    ABOUT METHOHEXITAL…  Myoclonicactivity  Pts with seizures of temporal lobe- specifically at risk Small doses activate seizure foci Higher doses- anticonvulsant like thiopental  Used to activate seizure foci during cortical mapping  Myoclonic activity  Pts with seizures of temporal lobe- specifically at risk Small doses activate seizure foci Higher doses- anticonvulsant like thiopental  Used to activate seizure foci during cortical mapping
  • 29.
    PROPOFOL:  Effects onCBF and CMR are quite similar to those of barbiturates.  Reduce CMR  vasoconstriction decrease CBF & ICP  Fentanyl + propofol  ablates increase in ICP at intubation  CO2 responsiveness preserved  Autoregulation preserved  Short elimination half life  Excessive hypotension & cardiac depression – in elderly/ unstable pts can compromise CPP
  • 30.
    PROPOFOL AND SEIZUREINCIDENCE:  dystonic & choriform movements, opisthotonus etc have been reported with its use, SYSTEMATIC STUDIES FAILED TO CONFIRM THAT PROPOFOL IS PROCONVULSANT  Appears to be anticonvulsant in animals
  • 31.
    PROPOFOL & BRAINPROTECTION:
  • 32.
    ETOMIDATE :  Parallelreductions in CBF, CMR & ICP  Effect on CMR variable: more in cortex than brainstem May be responsible for greater hemodynamic stability in unstable pts.  ↓ CSF production & ↑ absorption Concerns ………… ADRENOCORTICAL SUPPRESSION
  • 33.
    ETOMIDATE :  Highincidence of myoclonic movements  May precipitate generalized epileptic EEG activity in epileptic patients..avoided here  Activate seizure foci and low doses used for intra op EEG localization  When used in ECT longer seizures compared to Thiopentone and Propofol  But used in refractory status epilepticus
  • 34.
    OPIOIDS:  In general,little effects in normal brain  When occur, modest reduction in CBF& CMR, unless PaCO₂ ↑ 2° to respiratory depression  Morphine, generally not considered optimal, due to poor lipid solubility and prolonged sedation
  • 35.
    FENTANYL & ALFENTANYL: FENTANYL modest reduction CBF & CMR in quiescent brain Larger reduction during arousal  ALFENTANYL  No significant changes Small doses <50 mg/kg) can activate seizure foci in pts with epilepsy
  • 36.
    SUFENTANYL :  Eitherreduction or no change in CMR&CBF  But sometimes in pts with intracranial tumors:  Sudden precipitous fall in MAP  decrease in CPP  autoregulation small increase in ICP  So be cautious…..
  • 37.
    REMIFENTANYL:  Low sedativedoses cause minor increase in CBF  Along with other anesthetics / higher doses  modest reduction or no change in CBF
  • 38.
    BENZODIAZEPINES:  Modest reductionin CBF  The reduction attained is intermediate b/w that caused by opioids (modest) barbiturates (substantial)  Midazolam preferred- short half life  Useful as anticonvulsant also  Remember they can produce respiratory depression increase in paCO2  If we avoid this… BENZODIAZEPINES appear safe
  • 39.
    DROPERIDOL:  Little orno effect on CMR  minimally reduces CBF  Can cause abrupt fall in MAP vasodilation increase in ICP (occasional)  When used with opioids as part of neuroleptic technique- may cause prolonged sedation – UNDESIRABLE
  • 40.
    KETAMINE:  Only IVagent to cause VASODILATAION ↑CBF (50-60%)  Effect is regionally variable limbic system & reticular formation are activated Somatosensory & auditory areas are depressed Total CMR doesn’t change  Seizure activity in thalamus and limbic area.
  • 41.
    KETAMINE:  May impedeabsorption of CSF ↑CBF, CBV & CSF volume : ↑ ICP (potentially)  Better to avoid as sole agent…  Diazepam , Midazolam ,Isoflurane /N2O, Propofol …. They blunt its effects  Reasonable to use it along with the above drugs… cautiously
  • 42.
    LIDOCAINE:  Reduce CMR,CBF & ICP, but to a lesser degree  Decreses CBF without other major hemodynamic effects  membrane stabilizing effect of lignocaine also reduces energy needs for membrane integrity  Rx & prevention of acute rise in ICP, also during laryngoscopy , intubation & ETT suctioning  Risk of systemic toxicity and seizures – limit the usefulness of repeated dosing
  • 44.
  • 45.
    VOLATILE AGENTS…. Reduce CMR •. Cerebral vasodilation augment CBF • .
  • 46.
    VOLATILE AGENTS &CMR:  ↓ CMR- dose dependent  Max depression – isoflurane (about 50%)  Least effect – halothane (less than 25%)  No further decrease in reduction in CMR is observed once EEG is isoelectric. (Unlike hypothermia)  Reduction in CMR – not uniform Mainly in neocortex
  • 47.
    VOLATILE AGENTS &CBF:  Dilate blood vessels & impair auto regulation - in a dose dependent manner  Greatest effect – halothane Conc >1%- nearly abolishes auto regulation Blood flow increase - generalized throughout brain At equivalent MAC – halothane ↑ CBF 200%, compared to 20% for isoflurane.  Isoflurane increases blood flow mainly in subcortical ares & hindbrain (unlike halothane)  Qualitatively & quantitatively – des/sevoflurane closest to isoflurane
  • 48.
    EFFECTS @ DIFFERENTMACs: D o s e b e y o n d 1 M A C CMR reduced; but vasodilatory effect predominates CBF increases @ 1 M A C CMR suppression = vasodilation CBF unchanged @ 0 . 5 M A C CMR suppression predominates So net CBF decreases
  • 50.
    VOLATILE AGENTS:  Thevasodilator effect usually appear rapidly than the effects on CMR.  The CBF also appears to be time dependent Returns to almost normal after continued admn (2-5 hrs)  If antecedent lowering of CMR by drugs/disease, then vasodilator effect may predominate  ↑ in CBV (10-12%) generally parallels CBF But relation is not necessarily linear
  • 51.
    VOLATILE AGENTS &PaCO₂:  CO2 responsiveness of vasculature - preserved Hyperventilation can therfore abolish/blunt the effects on CBF Timing is important Effect is observed only if hyperventilation is initiated prior to admn of halothane In contrast, simultaneous hyperventilation with iso/sevoflurane- can prevent ↑ in ICP  Hypocapnia most effective during isoflurane admn.
  • 52.
    HALOTHANE:  CBF dramatic increase in CBF with a simultaneous modest reduction in CMR  CMR suppression is less compared to other agents ↓ CMR with ↑CBF- termed as luxury perfusion may be desirable during induced hypotension Beneficial during global ischemia
  • 53.
    HALOTHANE:  Circulatory stealphenomenon: In setting of focal ischemia, ↑CBF in normal areas of but not in ischemic areas- where arterioles are already maximally vasodilated End result- redistribution of blood away from ischemic areas
  • 54.
    ENFLURANE  CBF dramaticincrease in CBF with a simultaneous modest reduction in CMR  Potentially epileptogenic hypocapnea potentiates this effect  Seizure activity elevate brain metabolism by as much as 400%  Will you prefer? So avoid: if seizure predisposition
  • 55.
    ISOFLURANE:  CBF increasesCBF; but to a lesser extent 20% (halothane increases by 200%)  CMR decreases CMRO₂ maximal reduction is attained simultaneously with EEG suppression (at clinically relevant 1.5-2.0 MAC) 1 MAC decrease CMRO2 by 25% Max depression upto 50%
  • 56.
     Distribution ofCBF/CMR changes: CBF increases are greater in subcortical and hindbrain areas than neocortex CMR suppression is greater in the neocortex than subcortex  Isoflurane facilitates absorption and is the only volatile agent with favorable effects on CSF dynamics.  Institution of hyperventilation : Simultaneous, with its introduction can prevent increase in ICP
  • 57.
    SEVOFLURANE:  Reduce CBF Reduce CMRO2 by 38% at 1 MAC Max at EEG suppression at 1.5-2.0 MAC  Distribution in CBF Reduction in cortex Increase in cerebellum  Has small potential to evoke epileptiform activity use with caution in patients with epilepsy
  • 58.
    DESFLURANE:  Reduce CBF Decrease CMRO2 by 22% @ 1 MAC  In general: the effect of Isoflurane , Desflurane and Sevoflurane on CBF are modest
  • 59.
    SUMMARY OF VOLATILEAGENTS: MAJOR IMPACT ON CBF/CBV & ICP OCCURS WHEN > 1 MAC BECOMES SIGNIFICANT IF - INTRACRANIAL COMPLIANCE IS ABNORMAL HERE, BETTER TO USE A MAINLY IV TECHNIQUE – UNTIL OPENING OF CRANIUM & DURA NET VASODILATORY EFFECT OF ISO/DES & SEVO <HALOTHANE- SO PREFER THE FORMER ENFLURANE IS EPILEPTOGENIC & SLIGHT RISK WITH SEVOFLURANE CO2 REACTIVITY PRESERVED
  • 60.
    NITROUS OXIDE:  Whengiven alone: increase in CBF,CMR & ICP (sympathoadrenal stimulating effect)  Effects easily overcome by other agents or CO2  With IV agents: effect on CBF considerably reduced  With Volatile Agents: CBF increase is exaggerated
  • 61.
    NITROUS OXIDE:  Vasodilatoreffect clinically significant in those with abnormal intracranial compliance  so add IV agents  Surgical field persistently “tight”? N2O may be a culprit????  should be avoided in cases, where a closed intracranial gas space may exist it can enter and expand it
  • 62.
    NITROUS OXIDE:  CBFresponse to CO2 preserved  No uniform agreement reached on its effect on CMR
  • 64.
  • 65.
    NON DEPOLARIZING RELAXANTS: Lack direct action, but have 2° effects  Main effect is via Histamine release Cerebral vasodilation increase ICP  Simultaneous ↓in systemic BP histamine/ganglion blockade ↓ CPP
  • 66.
    NON DEPOLARIZING RELAXANTS- HISTAMINERELEASE Cisatracurium: Least Also :metocurine atracurium mivacurium D-tubocurarine
  • 67.
    NDMR:  Pancuronium- largebolus : abrupt increase in BP if autoregulation defective - increase ICP  metabolite of atracurium- Laudanosine:  epileptogenic properties in trials But” it appears highly unlikely that epileptogenesis will occur in humans with atracurium”
  • 68.
    MESSAGE…. NDMR USE: All are reasonable in I.C. hypertension  Avoid hypotension: Metocurine/Atracurium/Mivacurium  Anticonvulsant drug decrease the effect of NDMR
  • 69.
    SUCCINYLCHOLINE:  Increases ICPin lightly anaesthetized- small and transient. Possibly result of cerebral activation Enhanced muscle spindle activity- Increases metabolic rate and thus CBF  Prevention by: Adequate dose of inducing agent- deep plane Institute hyperventilation at induction Defasciculating dose of non depolarizing NMBA
  • 70.
     With normalautoregulation & intact BBB  CBF↑, only when MAP <50-60 mmHg or >150- 160 mm Hg  CMR generally parallels changes in CBF  Excessive elevation in BP can disrupt BBB VASOPRESSORS:
  • 71.
    VASODILATORS:  In absenceof hypotension:  cause cerebral vasodilation and ↑CBF in a dose related fashion  When the ↓ syetemic BP: CBF either maintained or increases Can significantly raise ICP in pt with ↓ intracranial compliance
  • 72.
    VASODILATORS:  Sodium nitroprussideis a direct-acting smooth muscle relaxant that produces arteriolar and venous dilatation, acts as cerebral vasodilator  Cerebral blood volume is increased and ICP may be elevated.  It is best avoided if ICP is high.
  • 73.
    VASODILATORS:  Nitroglycerin isprimarily a venodilator and coronary vasodilator  It acts by relaxing smooth muscle and works on the intracerebral venous capacitance vessels.  It increases cerebral blood volume and may increase ICP
  • 74.
    VASODILATORS:  Propofol, lidocaineor labetalol should be preferred instead.  Labetalol, a mixed α- and β- blocker, lowers MAP by lowering systemic vascular resistance and depressing cardiac output.  It has no direct effect on cerebral blood vessels.
  • 75.
    VASODILATORS:  Only trimethaphanhas no or little effect on CBF But it constricts pupils May interfere with neurological examination No longer available in USA
  • 76.
    REFERENCES MILLER’S ANESTHESIA,6/e ANESTHESIA &COEXISTING DISEASE,4e WYLIE& CHURCHILL DAVIDSONS’ APRACTICE OF ANESTHESIA TEXTBOOK OF NEUROANESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE Basil F. Matta, David K. Menon, John M. Turner
  • 77.