IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS)
e-ISSN: 2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 10, Issue 6 Ver. II (Nov - Dec. 2015), PP 01-10
www.iosrjournals.org
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 1 | Page
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex
pipiens Complex Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)
1
Martha W. Kiarie-Makara*
, 2
Philip M. Ngumbi, 3
Dong-Kyu Lee
1
School of Science, Engineering and Health Daystar University, P.O Box 44400-00100, GPO, Ngong Rd
Nairobi, Kenya
2
Center for Biotechnology Research and Development, Kenya Medical Research Institute,
P.O. BOX 54840 - 00200 Mbagathi Rd. Nairobi, Kenya
3
School of Environment and Health, Kosin University, Busan 606-701 Korea
*Corresponding author: Martha W. Kiarie-Makara, School of Science, Engineering and Health Daystar
University P.O Box 44400 -00100 GPO, Ngong Rd Nairobi, Kenya;
Abstract: This study sought to establish the direct effects of varying temperatures on the growth and
development of the two members of the domestic mosquito, Culex pipiens complex; Culex pipiens pallens
Coquillett and Culex pipiens molestus Forskal. The methods used were similar to those used by [18]. The
mosquitoes used were obtained from colonies reared at the Kosin University; south Korea, Insectary at a
temperature and relative humidity regime of 27 ± 1 o
C and 75 ± 5% RH, respectively and a 13:11 light and dark
photoperiod. The effects were evaluated in terms of embryonation times, length of the larval and pupal stages,
the survival rates and maximum longevity of the female. Varying temperatures were found to have effects on
egg embryonation, the lengths of the pupal and larval periods and the survival and longevity of the female
mosquitoes. The results showed that in lower temperatures embryonation took longer among the 20o
C and 24o
C
the larval and pupal stages were longer and the female mosquitoes lived longer. In higher temperatures (28o
C),
embryonation was faster, the larval and pupal stages were shorter and the females did not live for as long as
they did at 20o
C and 24o
C. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in egg embryonation times between
the two subspecies, at the three temperatures used in the study. There were no significant differences in the
larval period between the two subspecies between 24o
C and 28o
C. However, the length of the pupal period in
the two subspecies differed significantly (p < 0.05), at the three experimental temperatures. The pupal period of
Cx. Pipiens pallens averaged 5.5, 6.5 and 2.7 days while that of Cx. pipiens molestus averaged 6.4, 4.3 and 2.28
days at 20o
C, 24o
C and 28o
C temperatures, respectively.
Key word: Culex pipiens, Culex molestus, Embryonation, longevity, survival
I. Introduction
Weather can influence physiological events in insect populations by modifying the activity of the
endocrine system, which then influences survival, development and reproduction [1]. The study provided
information on the direct influence of temperature on the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae of two species
of Culex pipiens pipiens and Culex pipiens molestus, members of Culex pipiens complex. Mosquitoes are
known to have slow development but live long in low temperatures, fast development in summer and in certain
cases stop growth and development and go into diapause when the temperatures become unfavorable [2].
Many studies on the effects of temperature on mosquitoes have tended to concentrate on the study of
diapause, freezing tolerance and mosquito ecology with a few studies focusing on the direct effects of
temperatures on the active stages of the mosquitoes’ life cycle [1]. Temperature effects on growth and
development vary greatly on the different zoogeographical regions of mosquito distribution with temperature
being favorable throughout the year in the Afro-tropical zone. In the cool temperate zone, breeding and disease
transmission are limited to the warm spring and the hot summer [3].
As the human population in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world continue to increase, large
portions of the tropical forests are being cleared for settlement and farming. For industrial and technological
advancement, the developed countries cause huge increases in the burning of fossil fuels. The total results of the
ongoing change in the poor and developed countries are the huge additions of greenhouse gases like methane,
carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide into the earth’s, atmosphere [4]. Global temperatures are likely to rise as
predicated due to global warming caused by human activities on the earth’s surface [5]. This rise in temperature
could have the effect of increasing the range and land surface over which mosquitoes can survive with the
overall result of expanding the range of transmission of mosquito borne diseases [6].
Increased temperatures are also suspected to be associated with greater desiccation which could cause
higher mortality of the eggs, larvae and adult mosquitoes [7; 8; 9; 10]. Temperatures may affect egg viability
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 2 | Page
and subsequent embryonation [11], larval development [12], blood feeding behaviour [13], female fecundity
[14], survival and longevity [15; 16]. This would have a total effect on the population dynamics of the
mosquitoes. For example, mosquitoes reared at high temperature tend to develop faster but also tend to be
smaller in body size [16; 12] and this is important because the female size is related positively to fecundity [16].
Experimentation on the effects of rearing temperatures on mortality, developmental rates and female
adult sizes and survival rates is important as it helps understand the relationship between varying ambient
temperatures and population dynamics of the mosquito species[12], The information helps to predict how
regional differences in temperatures, seasonal differences within the same area and possible global warming due
to climate change that can affect the range of mosquito expansion and disease transmission. The area of
existence of dengue virus and its vector; Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus have extended to relatively
formerly colder areas of Asia and North America creating a potential for outbreak of dengue fever in these new
regions [17].The distribution and performance of the members of the Cx. pipiens complex are influenced by the
ambient temperature as shown by the results of this study.
II. Materials And Methods
Experimental Mosquitoes
The methods used were similar to those used by [18]. The two members of the domestic mosquito,
Culex pipiens complex; Culex pipiens pallens Coquillett and Culex pipiens molestus Forskal used in the tests
were obtained from colonies reared at the Kosin University Insectary for several years now. The mosquitoes
were reared and maintained at a temperature and relative humidity regime of 27 ± 1 o
C and 75 ± 5% RH,
respectively and a 13:11 light and dark photoperiod. The larvae were fed on a mixture of laboratory chow and
brewer’s yeast at a ratio of 2:1. The adults were fed and maintained on 10% sucrose solution presented using
methods described by [19]. The mosquitoes were reared and maintained free from insecticides and repellents.
The performance of Cx. Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus was evaluated under three different
temperature regimes. The tests were carried out in growth chambers/incubators (Model MIR 152, Sanyo
Electronic Co, Tokyo, Japan) set at 20o
C, 24o
C and 28o
C and daily light and dark cycles of 12:12 hours to
simulate the fall, spring and summer conditions. The humidity levels inside the growth chambers were
monitored by placing a battery-powered temperature and humidity digital meter inside each growth chamber.
This was necessary because like temperature, humidity influences growth and development in mosquitoes and
also modifies the effects of temperatures. The performance of the two Culex species was evaluated in terms of
their embryonation period, larval and pupal periods in three temperatures. Twelve hours before the start of the
experimentation, the three growth chambers were set at their respective temperature of 20o
C, 24o
C and 28o
C to
ensure they were in good working condition and to preset the temperature before inserting the eggs.
Tests for embryonation periods
The newly laid eggs, white in colour, were collected from the respective adult mosquito species for
setting up the experiments in the morning. For embryonation, the fresh eggs were placed in the eighteen 2,000
ml clear/colorless hard plastic hatching containers. The18 containers were divided into three groups of 6
containers, to go into each of the growth chambers. Each growth chamber held three containers of Cx. Pipiens
pallens and three of Cx. Pipiens molestus eggs at the specified temperature. A single raft of eggs (approximate
100-150 eggs) was placed in each of the 6 egg-hatching plastic containers with about 1,000 ml of dechlorinated
water (Fig. 6.1). Each of the 18 egg-hatching containers was labeled with the full name of the species, the
temperature at which the test was set, and the date of the starting of the test and given an identifying number
(e.g. Cx. Pipiens pallens 2009/June/1st
, 20o
C, Container 1, 2 or 3).Observations were made at intervals of six
hours and the numbers of larvae hatching from the eggs were recorded. The recording was made on a prepared
data entry form and each test was replicated three times.
A record of the number of larvae hatching was taken until maximum hatching was attained, and this
was indicated by lack of further increase in larval numbers in each of the hatching containers. The embryonation
period was calculated by multiplying the number of larvae by the number of days taken to hatch and then
divided by the maximum number of larvae hatched for that replicate. This was done for all the hatchings prior to
the maximum hatching and added to give the total hatching period in days.
For example, if replicate 1 at 20o
C for Cx. Pipiens pallens hatched 59 larvae in 2.5 days, to get the
embryonation period, (2.5 x 59)/59 to give 2.5 days as the embryonation period. If replicate 2 of the same
species at the same temperature hatched 40 larvae after 2 days and then after 2.5 the number increased to 47, 47
is the maximum hatching. To get the embryonation period, (2.0 x40)/47 + (2.5 x47)/47=2.25(Same as taking the
average of the two replicates) is the embryonation period in days. These calculations were repeated with all the
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 3 | Page
replicates at the three temperatures at which the experimentation was done. The average embryonation period
was obtained by adding up the total for the three replicates and dividing by three. The embryonation periods
were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for
Windows, to find out if there were significant differences in embryonation period between the two species and
within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests.
Fig1The arrangement of egg-hatching containers in the growth chamber for development under controlled
temperature with aeration system shown
Tests for the length of the larval period
Once hatching had taken place, aeration system was put in place to stop scumming and frothing of the
larvae rearing water (Fig.6.1). The larvae were fed with a mixture of laboratory chow and yeast at a ratio of 2:1,
respectively.
Observations made at six hour intervals and the numbers of pupae forming in each of the egg-hatching
container were recorded. The larval period was calculated by multiplying the number of pupae at each
observation point by the number of days since the larvae were hatched. For example, if at 14.5 days after larvae
hatching, 6 pupae had formed the total period is 14.5 x 6= 87, this was done for all the observations, totaled up
and divided by the total number of pupae from that particular replicate (container). For example, if in replicate 2
at 20o
C a total of 39 pupae formed in a cumulative duration of 608.5 days, the actual larval period for each larva
was obtained by 608.5/39= 15.6 days. This means each larva at 20o
C lived an average of 15.6 days before
pupation set in. This was done for all the replicates at three temperatures. An average larval period at each
temperature was calculated by adding up the totals for the three replicates and dividing by three. The larval
periods were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc.
2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the larval periods between the two species
and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests.
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 4 | Page
Tests for the length of the pupal period
The pupae were moved from the breeding water into beakers within the same growth chamber.
Eighteen 2,000 ml and eighteen 10 ml glass beakers were used for the tests. They were divided into three groups
of twelve beakers per chamber (six 2,000 ml and six 10 ml beakers). The 12 beakers in each chamber were then
divided in two groups each of three 2,000ml and three 10 ml beakers, one group of beakers to hold pupae of Cx.
Pipiens pallens and the other pupae of Cx. Pipiens molestus. The 10 ml beaker with about 5.0 ml of clean water
was placed inside the 2,000ml beaker. The 2,000ml beakers were then tightly and covered with a piece of cotton
cloth and a small slit made in the middle to allow for insertion of an aspirator into the beaker. A ball of cotton
wool was used to close the slit to prevent adults from escaping out of the beaker once eclosion occurred. The
beaker was then labeled with the name of the species, date of the test, temperature of the chamber, a number
corresponding to that of the hatching-container from which the pupae were being transferred and the number of
pupae placed therein (e.g. Cx. Pipiens pallens 2009/June/1st
, 20o
C, beaker 1, 2 or 3, 159 pupae). The pupae
were collected with a little water using a large pipette and moved into the 10ml beaker inside the 2,000 ml
beaker and then placed inside the growth chamber at the correct test temperature. To feed the emerging adults,
the feeding cotton swab used to close the slit was irrigated with 10% sugar water and covered with clear para-
film to prevent evaporation and drying up.
Observations were made at intervals of six hours and the number of adults emerging recorded until all
the pupae underwent eclosion. The length of the pupal period was obtained by adding up the total numbers of
adults emerged, in each replicate divided by the total period in days in which all the adults emerged. For
example, if at 20o
C on day 20, 3.5 days after the pupae were placed in the beaker only 1 adult had emerged the
total pupal period is given by 3.5 x 1=3.5 days. This was done for each observation period through the days until
no more adults emerged. For example, if a total of 150 adults emerged over an accumulative period of 75 days,
the actual pupal period was obtained by 150/75=2.0 days, meaning it took an average 2.0 days for each larva at
20o
C to emerge into an adult. This was calculated for all the three replicates at each of the three temperatures.
An average for each temperature was obtained by adding up the pupal periods for the three replicates and
dividing by three. The pupal periods were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using
SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the pupal
periods between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests.
Tests on survival and maximum longevity of Culex pipiens female mosquitoes
After the adults emerged, a new set of experiments was initiated at each temperature to compare
survival rates and maximum longevity of the females of Cx. Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus at the
three temperatures of 20o
C, 24o
C and 28o
C. Six 500ml beakers were used in each growth chamber. The beakers
top was tightly covered with a piece of cotton material with a small slit made at the middle to allow for the
insertion of the aspirator to place the females into the beaker. A feeding swab irrigated with 10% sugar water
was placed over the slit at the top of the beaker and covered with clear Para film to prevent drying up due to
evaporation. Each beaker was labeled with the species name, the date, the temperature and number of adults
introduced inside. Females were transferred from the 2,000 ml beakers with an aspirator to the 500ml beakers.
The beakers were then placed into the growth chambers. Each test was replicated three times.
Observations were made at intervals of 12 hours and the number of dead and live females recorded.
These observations were continued for the three temperatures until all the females in all the replicates died. To
work out the survival period for the females, the point at which the females died was considered as indicating
the number of days they have lived since emergence from pupae. For example if at 28o
C, in replicate 2, three
females died at day 2, they were considered to have lived for a total of 2 x 3= 6 days. This was calculated for all
the days until all the females died. If in replicate 2 of the test at 28o
C, had 78 females all dying after an
accumulative period of 633 days, average survival in days is given by 663/78= 8.1 days. This means that each
female in the replicate lived an average of 8.1 days then died. This was calculated for all the replicates in the
three temperatures. An average for each temperature was calculated by adding the survival number of days for
the three replicates and then dividing by three. It was taken as longest period in days over which the females in
each replicate survived. Maximum longevity was calculated by taking the point of death of the longest surviving
females in each replicate and working out an average for the three replicates at each temperature.
Statistical Analysis
The survival and longevity data were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using
SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the
survival periods between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests.
III. Results
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 5 | Page
The results showed that temperature has effects on embryonation, larval and pupal periods as well as
the length of survival time in mosquitoes. The results of embryonation periods, larval and pupal period, survival
and maximum longevity are given in Tables 1 to 5 below.
Table1. Comparison of embryonation periods between Culex pipiens pallens and Culex
pipiens molestus eggs under three different temperatures
Mean day ± S.D
Temp(o
C)
Cx. pipiens pallens Cx. pipiens molestus
20 2.19 ± 0.27a*A** 2.18 ± 0.28aA
24 1.60 ± 0.23 aA 1.50 ± 0.00aB
28 1.12 ± 0.21aB 1.16 ± 0.28aB
*means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different
At the 5% level of probability.
**means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.
.
There were no significant differences in the embryonation periods between the two species under each
of the three experimental temperatures at p > 0.05. At 20o
C, the eggs of Cx. Pipiens pallens took an average of
2.19 days for embryonation while those of Cx. Pipiens pallens took 2.18 days. At 24o
C, the eggs of the Cx.
Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average of 1.6 and 1.5 days, respectively. At 28o
C, the eggs of
the two species of Cx. pallens and Cx. molestus took 1.1 and 1.16 days, respectively (Table 1).
Within each species, there while no significant differences (p >0.05) in embryonation period between 20o
C and
24o
C in Cx. Pallens pipiens but there were significant differences between the embryonation period at 20o
C and
24o
C, and that of 28o
C (p < 0.05). In Cx. Pipiens molestus, there were no significant difference in the
embryonation period between 28o
C and 24o
C but the embryonation periods at the two temperatures significantly
differed with that at 20o
C (Table 1).
Table 2. Comparison of the length of the larval period in Culex pipiens pallens and Culex
pipiens molestus under three different temperatures
Mean day ± S.D
Temperature
(o
C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus
20 16.35 ± 2.20a*A** 17.70 ± 0.60aA
24 9.50 ± 0.70bB 13.60 ± 0.60aB
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 6 | Page
28 7.90 ± 0.85aB 9.40 ± 0.40aC
*Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different at 5 % level of probability.
**Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significantly different at 5 % level of
probability.
Temperature was found to affect the length of the larval period. There were no significant differences in the
larval period between the two species at 20o
C with the larvae of Cx. Pipiens pallens living for an average of
16.35 days before undergoing pupation, while those of Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average 17.70days. At
24o
C, the larval period for the two species differed significantly with the larvae of Cx. Pipiens pallens
taking an average of 9.5 days before pupation, whiles those of Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average of 13.6
days (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the length of the larval stage at 28o
C for the
species. Within the Cx. Pipiens pallens, there were significant differences in the larval periods between
20o
C and 24o
C but there were no significant difference between 24o
C and 28o
C. The length of the larval
period differed significantly between 20o
C and 28o
C. Within the Cx. Pipiens molestus, the length of the
larval period differed significantly at all the three temperatures.
Table 3. Comparison of the length of the pupal period in Culex pipiens pallens
And Culex pipiens molestus at three different temperatures
Mean day ±S.D
Temperature
(
o
C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus
20 5.54 ± 0.25b*A** 6.40 ± 0.40aA
24 6.53 ± 0.60aA 4.34 ± 0.32bB `
28 2.73 ± 0.20bB 2.28 ± 0.67aB
*Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different at the 5 % level
of probability
**Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significant different at the 5 %
level of probability
The pupal period seems to have more influence from temperatures. The length of the larval period
differed significantly between the two species at all the three temperatures at p < 0.05 (Table 3).
Within the individual species, there were no significant differences in the length of the pupal at
20o
C and 24o
C but the two differed significantly with the pupal period at 28o
C in Cx. Pipiens pallens.
In Cx. Pipiens molestus, there were no significant differences between the pupal periods at 28o
C
and 24o
C (p> 0.05) but the two differed significantly with the pupal period at 20o
C (p < 0.05).
Table4. Survival in days of females of two of Culex pipiens complex species at 3 different temperature regimes
Mean day ± S.D
Temperature
(
o
C) Cx. pipiens pallens Cx. pipiens molestus
20 18.9 ± 1.6aA 29.2 ± 9.3aA
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 7 | Page
24 13.5 ± 4.1aA 9.7 ± 2.2aB
28 7.7 ± 1.1aB 8.6 ± 0.7aB
*Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly
different at the 5 % level of probability.
**Means in the same column followed by the upper case letter are not significantly
different at the 5 % level of probability.
There were no significant differences in the survival rates between the two species at all three temperatures (p>
0.0. Within the species there were no significant differences in the survival of the Cx. Pipiens pallens at 20o
C
and 24o
C but the two differed significantly with the survival at 28o
C. In the Cx. Pipiens molestus the survival
differed significantly between 20o
C and 24o
C but it did not differ significantly between 24o
C and 28o
C (Table
5and Figs. 2, 3 &4).
Fig 2Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 20o
C.
The survival in the females of the two Cx. pipiens species was inversely proportional to the
temperature. More females survived in the lower temperatures than those at higher temperatures while fewer
females survived in high temperatures.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
%survival
Survival period in Days
Culex
pipiens
molestus
Culex
pipiens
pallens
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 8 | Page
Fig 3Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 24o
C.
Fig. 4.Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 28o
C.
Table5. Maximum longevity in days by female mosquitoes of two species of
Culex pipiens complex
Max longevity in days ± S.D
Temp (o
C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus
20 37.3 ± 0.6aA 38.3 ± 0.6aA
24 26.3 ± 0.6aB 27.3 ± 0.6aB
28 14.3 ± 0.6a*C** 15.3 ± 0.6aC
*Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not different significantly
at the 5 % level of probability.
**Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
%Survival
Survival period in days
Culex
pipiens
molestus
Culex
pipiens
pallens
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 9 | Page
significantly different at the 5 % of probability
The maximum longevity was inversely proportional to the temperatures; as the temperature increases
the females of both species of Cx. pipiens tended to live for shorter periods. The longest living females were
those reared at 20o
C and the shortest living those reared at 28o
C.
The shortest periods of immature development were observed at 28o
C with averages of 7.9 ± 0.9 days (Cx.
pipiens pallens) and 9.4 days (Cx. Pipiens molestus), while the longest periods were at 20o
C with averages of
16.4 days (Cx. pipiens pallens) and 17.7 days (Cx. pipiens molestus). There were significant differences (p <
0.05) in the length of both the larval and pupae periods at the three temperatures in each subspecies. However,
there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the length of the larval period between Cx. pipiens pallens and
Cx. pipiens molestus at 20o
C and 28o
C although these were significantly different at 24o
C. The length of the
pupal stage differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the two subspecies. These results indicate the ability of
the members of theCx. pipiens complex to survive over wide range of temperatures.
IV. Discussion
From the results, it was evident that temperatures influence egg embryonation, the length of the larval
and pupal stages of the mosquito as well as their survival and maximum longevity of the two species of Cx.
pipiens. Temperatures have been shown to affect both the biology and the ecology of the Cx. Pipiens complex
[20]. The results of this study seem to fall in agreement that at higher temperatures, the mosquitoes’
performance in terms of embryonation, larval and pupal growth is faster yet the mosquitoes generally live for a
shorter period. At low temperatures, the mosquitoes took long to go through their life cycle and lived for long.
In many parts of the world, the transmission of mosquito borne diseases is seasonal and is linked to rainfall and
temperature patterns. Temperature is a key determinant of boundaries of disease transmission and distribution.
This is achieved either by limiting the distribution of the vectors or because below certain temperature the
pathogen cannot complete its life cycle within the vector. Temperatures have effects on the emergence, survival
and the subsequent behavior of the adult Cx. pipiens mosquitoes [21]. This agrees with the findings of our study
where in higher temperatures the mosquitoes complete their life cycle faster but also died earlier with the
females living for an average of 7.7-8.6 days at 28o
C.
Higher temperatures are known to shorten the extrinsic incubation period of pathogens within their
mosquito vectors [22]. The rearing temperatures influence the vector competence of the mosquitoes [23] as
vector’s competence tends to be depressed by decreasing the temperature for adult mosquitoes. In summer when
temperatures are high within the tropics, the water temperatures in the containers where the domestic
mosquitoes like Cx. Pipiens complex breed tend to increase. This increase as long as it is tolerable, tends to
favour their role as disease vectors but certain temperature rises may go way beyond the levels at which the
mosquito immature stages can survive [18]. When the larvae of Aedes aegypti were exposed to a range of
varying temperatures, mortality was observed to increase with increase with temperatures above certain levels
with the temperature being completely lethal at 43o
C [18]. Adults reared at higher temperatures tend to be more
susceptible to pathogens such as arbovirus and temperature has been thought to act as a selection factor for the
mosquitoes responsible for the transmission of diseases like Chikungunya virus.
High temperatures induce formation of heat shock proteins in certain mosquitoes such as Anopheles
which have been found to contribute to their success as disease pathogen vectors [24]. Similar heat shock
proteins induced by rearing mosquitoes under high temperatures have been observed in Ae. aegypti and Ae.
albopictus [25]. In tropical regions, where temperatures are often high, the mosquitoes breed in water containers
whose water temperature rearing goes beyond the 41o
C [18] but supports the disease transmission by
mosquitoes in the region. An increase in temperature above the average in an area, where mosquito borne
diseases are endemic, could result in a number of events. It could enhance the selection of temperature-tolerant
mosquitoes within the mosquitoes’ population with a long longevity. It could also reduce the intrinsic incubation
period of the pathogen within the vector mosquitoes which could result in epidemic outbreaks. It could also
cause increased susceptibility of the mosquitoes to the pathogens like virus hence increasing their vector
competence [26]. Studies using Ochlerotatus albifasciatus mosquitoes showed that the life cycle in these
mosquitoes is directly influenced by the ambient temperatures. The length of its life cycle varied from a
minimum of 6 days at 24o
C to a maximum of 32 days at 13o
C [27].
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Kosin University for funding support used in this study, professor Lee Dong
Kyu, in whose laboratory this work was done. The authors are also grateful to Daystar University and Kenya
Medical Research Institute for their support.
Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes…
DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 10 | Page
References
[1]. O’Meara GF, Evans LF, Getman AD Jr, Cuda JP. 1995. Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. Aegypti(Diptera: Culicidae)
in Florida. J Med Entomol 32: 554 - 562.
[2]. Gilbert N, Raworth, DA. 1996. Canadian Entomologist 128 (1): 1-13.
[3]. Toma T, Sakamoto S, Miyagi I. 1982. The seasonal abundance of Aedes albopictus in Okinawajima, the Ryukyu archipelago,
Japan.Mosq News 42: 179 - 183.
[4]. Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75: 1861-1876.
[5]. Patz JA, Epstein PR, Burke TA, Balbus J.M. 1996.Global climate change and emerging infectious diseases. JAMA 275: 217 -223.
[6]. Hien DS. 1975.Biology of Aedes aegypti(L., 1762) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1865) (Diptera, Culicidae). Acta Parasitol Pol 23:
553 - 568.
[7]. Sota T, Mogi M. 1992a. Survival time and resistance to desiccation of diapause and non-diapause eggs of temperate
Aedes(Stegomyia) mosquitoes. Entomol Exp Appl 63: 155-161.
[8]. Sota T, Mogi M. 1992b.Interspecific variation in desiccation survival time of Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito eggs is correlated with
habitat and egg size. Oecologia 90: 353 -358.
[9]. Reeves WC, Hardy JL, Reisen WK, Milby MM. 1994. Potential effect of global warming on mosquito-borne arboviruses. J Med
Entomol 31: 323 - 332.
[10]. Mogi M, Miyagi I, Abadi K, Syafruddin K. 1996. Inter and intraspecific variation in resistance to desiccation by adult
Aedes(Stegomyia) spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) from Indonesia. J Med Entomol 33: 53 - 57.
[11]. Parker M.B. 1986. Hatchability of eggs of Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae): effects of different temperatures and
photoperiods during embryogenesis. Ann EntomolSoc Am 79: 925 - 930.
[12]. Rueda LM, Patel KJ, Axtell RC, Stinner RE 1990. Temperature-dependent development and survival rates of Culex
quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti(Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 27: 892-898.
[13]. Crans WJ, Sprenger DA, Mahmood F. 1996. The blood-feeding habits of Aedes sollicitans (Walker) in relation to Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus in coastal areas of New Jersey, II. Results of experiments with caged mosquitoes and the effects of temperature
and physiological age on host selection.J Vector Ecol 21: 1 - 5.
[14]. Hurlbut HS. 1973. The effect of environmental temperature upon the transmission of St. Louis encephalitis virus by Culex pipiens
quinquefasciatus. J Med Entomol 10: 1-12.
[15]. Hawley WA. 1985. The effect of larval density on adult longevity of a mosquito, Aedes sierrensis: epidemiological consequences. J
AnimEcol 54: 955 - 964.
[16]. Day JF, Ramsey AM, Zhang J. 1990.Environmentally mediated seasonal variation in mosquito body size.J Environ Entomol 19:
469 - 473.
[17]. Majumdar, SK., LS. Kalkstein et al. (1992). Impact of global climate change on human health: spread of infectious disease. Global
climate change: Implications, Challenges and mitigation measures. Easton PA, The Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences: 367-370.
[18]. Mourya TD, Yadav P, Mishra AC. 2004. Effects of temperature stress on immature stages and susceptibility of Aedes aegypti
mosquitoes to Chikungunya virus. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7 (4): 346 - 350.
[19]. Gerberg, EJ, Bernard DR, Ward RA (1994). Manual for Mosquito Rearing and Experimental techniques; American Mosquito
Control Association Bulletin No. 5: 61-62.
[20]. Lee DK, Lee WJ. 1992. Overwintering mosquito population of Culex pipiens molestus in the underground structures in Pusan.
Korean Journal of Entomology 22: 273 - 279.
[21]. Oda T, Uchida K, Mori A. 1999. Effects of high temperature on the emergence and survival of adult Culex pipiens molestus and
Culex quinquefasciatus in Japan.J Am Mosq Contr Assoc 15: 153 - 156.
[22]. Chamberlin RW, Sudia WD, 1955. The effect of temperature upon the extrinsic incubation of eastern equine encephalitis in
mosquitoes. Am J Hyg62: 295 - 305.
[23]. Kay BH, Fanning ID, Mottram P, 1989. Rearing temperature influences flavivirus vector competence of mosquitoes. Med Vet
Entomol3: 415–422.
[24]. Nath BB, Lakhotia SC, 1989. Heat shock response in ovarian nurse cells of Anopheles stephensi. J Biosci14: 143–153.
[25]. Lan Q, Fallon AM, 1990. Small heat shock proteins distinguishing between two mosquito species and confirm identity of their cell
lines. Am J Trop Med Hyg43: 669- 676.
[26]. Hardy JL, Houk EJ, Kramer LD, Reeves WC, 1983. Intrinsic factors affecting vector competence of mosquitoes for arboviruses.
Annu Rev Entomol28: 229–262.
[27]. Soledad FM, Cristina MM, Fischer S, Pablo WO, Schweigmann N. 2000. Effects of flooding and temperature on Aedes
albifasciatus development time and larval density in two rain pools at Bueno Aires University City. Mem Inst Cruz 95 (6): 787 –
793.

Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • 1.
    IOSR Journal ofPharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) e-ISSN: 2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 10, Issue 6 Ver. II (Nov - Dec. 2015), PP 01-10 www.iosrjournals.org DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 1 | Page Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) 1 Martha W. Kiarie-Makara* , 2 Philip M. Ngumbi, 3 Dong-Kyu Lee 1 School of Science, Engineering and Health Daystar University, P.O Box 44400-00100, GPO, Ngong Rd Nairobi, Kenya 2 Center for Biotechnology Research and Development, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P.O. BOX 54840 - 00200 Mbagathi Rd. Nairobi, Kenya 3 School of Environment and Health, Kosin University, Busan 606-701 Korea *Corresponding author: Martha W. Kiarie-Makara, School of Science, Engineering and Health Daystar University P.O Box 44400 -00100 GPO, Ngong Rd Nairobi, Kenya; Abstract: This study sought to establish the direct effects of varying temperatures on the growth and development of the two members of the domestic mosquito, Culex pipiens complex; Culex pipiens pallens Coquillett and Culex pipiens molestus Forskal. The methods used were similar to those used by [18]. The mosquitoes used were obtained from colonies reared at the Kosin University; south Korea, Insectary at a temperature and relative humidity regime of 27 ± 1 o C and 75 ± 5% RH, respectively and a 13:11 light and dark photoperiod. The effects were evaluated in terms of embryonation times, length of the larval and pupal stages, the survival rates and maximum longevity of the female. Varying temperatures were found to have effects on egg embryonation, the lengths of the pupal and larval periods and the survival and longevity of the female mosquitoes. The results showed that in lower temperatures embryonation took longer among the 20o C and 24o C the larval and pupal stages were longer and the female mosquitoes lived longer. In higher temperatures (28o C), embryonation was faster, the larval and pupal stages were shorter and the females did not live for as long as they did at 20o C and 24o C. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in egg embryonation times between the two subspecies, at the three temperatures used in the study. There were no significant differences in the larval period between the two subspecies between 24o C and 28o C. However, the length of the pupal period in the two subspecies differed significantly (p < 0.05), at the three experimental temperatures. The pupal period of Cx. Pipiens pallens averaged 5.5, 6.5 and 2.7 days while that of Cx. pipiens molestus averaged 6.4, 4.3 and 2.28 days at 20o C, 24o C and 28o C temperatures, respectively. Key word: Culex pipiens, Culex molestus, Embryonation, longevity, survival I. Introduction Weather can influence physiological events in insect populations by modifying the activity of the endocrine system, which then influences survival, development and reproduction [1]. The study provided information on the direct influence of temperature on the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae of two species of Culex pipiens pipiens and Culex pipiens molestus, members of Culex pipiens complex. Mosquitoes are known to have slow development but live long in low temperatures, fast development in summer and in certain cases stop growth and development and go into diapause when the temperatures become unfavorable [2]. Many studies on the effects of temperature on mosquitoes have tended to concentrate on the study of diapause, freezing tolerance and mosquito ecology with a few studies focusing on the direct effects of temperatures on the active stages of the mosquitoes’ life cycle [1]. Temperature effects on growth and development vary greatly on the different zoogeographical regions of mosquito distribution with temperature being favorable throughout the year in the Afro-tropical zone. In the cool temperate zone, breeding and disease transmission are limited to the warm spring and the hot summer [3]. As the human population in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world continue to increase, large portions of the tropical forests are being cleared for settlement and farming. For industrial and technological advancement, the developed countries cause huge increases in the burning of fossil fuels. The total results of the ongoing change in the poor and developed countries are the huge additions of greenhouse gases like methane, carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide into the earth’s, atmosphere [4]. Global temperatures are likely to rise as predicated due to global warming caused by human activities on the earth’s surface [5]. This rise in temperature could have the effect of increasing the range and land surface over which mosquitoes can survive with the overall result of expanding the range of transmission of mosquito borne diseases [6]. Increased temperatures are also suspected to be associated with greater desiccation which could cause higher mortality of the eggs, larvae and adult mosquitoes [7; 8; 9; 10]. Temperatures may affect egg viability
  • 2.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 2 | Page and subsequent embryonation [11], larval development [12], blood feeding behaviour [13], female fecundity [14], survival and longevity [15; 16]. This would have a total effect on the population dynamics of the mosquitoes. For example, mosquitoes reared at high temperature tend to develop faster but also tend to be smaller in body size [16; 12] and this is important because the female size is related positively to fecundity [16]. Experimentation on the effects of rearing temperatures on mortality, developmental rates and female adult sizes and survival rates is important as it helps understand the relationship between varying ambient temperatures and population dynamics of the mosquito species[12], The information helps to predict how regional differences in temperatures, seasonal differences within the same area and possible global warming due to climate change that can affect the range of mosquito expansion and disease transmission. The area of existence of dengue virus and its vector; Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus have extended to relatively formerly colder areas of Asia and North America creating a potential for outbreak of dengue fever in these new regions [17].The distribution and performance of the members of the Cx. pipiens complex are influenced by the ambient temperature as shown by the results of this study. II. Materials And Methods Experimental Mosquitoes The methods used were similar to those used by [18]. The two members of the domestic mosquito, Culex pipiens complex; Culex pipiens pallens Coquillett and Culex pipiens molestus Forskal used in the tests were obtained from colonies reared at the Kosin University Insectary for several years now. The mosquitoes were reared and maintained at a temperature and relative humidity regime of 27 ± 1 o C and 75 ± 5% RH, respectively and a 13:11 light and dark photoperiod. The larvae were fed on a mixture of laboratory chow and brewer’s yeast at a ratio of 2:1. The adults were fed and maintained on 10% sucrose solution presented using methods described by [19]. The mosquitoes were reared and maintained free from insecticides and repellents. The performance of Cx. Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus was evaluated under three different temperature regimes. The tests were carried out in growth chambers/incubators (Model MIR 152, Sanyo Electronic Co, Tokyo, Japan) set at 20o C, 24o C and 28o C and daily light and dark cycles of 12:12 hours to simulate the fall, spring and summer conditions. The humidity levels inside the growth chambers were monitored by placing a battery-powered temperature and humidity digital meter inside each growth chamber. This was necessary because like temperature, humidity influences growth and development in mosquitoes and also modifies the effects of temperatures. The performance of the two Culex species was evaluated in terms of their embryonation period, larval and pupal periods in three temperatures. Twelve hours before the start of the experimentation, the three growth chambers were set at their respective temperature of 20o C, 24o C and 28o C to ensure they were in good working condition and to preset the temperature before inserting the eggs. Tests for embryonation periods The newly laid eggs, white in colour, were collected from the respective adult mosquito species for setting up the experiments in the morning. For embryonation, the fresh eggs were placed in the eighteen 2,000 ml clear/colorless hard plastic hatching containers. The18 containers were divided into three groups of 6 containers, to go into each of the growth chambers. Each growth chamber held three containers of Cx. Pipiens pallens and three of Cx. Pipiens molestus eggs at the specified temperature. A single raft of eggs (approximate 100-150 eggs) was placed in each of the 6 egg-hatching plastic containers with about 1,000 ml of dechlorinated water (Fig. 6.1). Each of the 18 egg-hatching containers was labeled with the full name of the species, the temperature at which the test was set, and the date of the starting of the test and given an identifying number (e.g. Cx. Pipiens pallens 2009/June/1st , 20o C, Container 1, 2 or 3).Observations were made at intervals of six hours and the numbers of larvae hatching from the eggs were recorded. The recording was made on a prepared data entry form and each test was replicated three times. A record of the number of larvae hatching was taken until maximum hatching was attained, and this was indicated by lack of further increase in larval numbers in each of the hatching containers. The embryonation period was calculated by multiplying the number of larvae by the number of days taken to hatch and then divided by the maximum number of larvae hatched for that replicate. This was done for all the hatchings prior to the maximum hatching and added to give the total hatching period in days. For example, if replicate 1 at 20o C for Cx. Pipiens pallens hatched 59 larvae in 2.5 days, to get the embryonation period, (2.5 x 59)/59 to give 2.5 days as the embryonation period. If replicate 2 of the same species at the same temperature hatched 40 larvae after 2 days and then after 2.5 the number increased to 47, 47 is the maximum hatching. To get the embryonation period, (2.0 x40)/47 + (2.5 x47)/47=2.25(Same as taking the average of the two replicates) is the embryonation period in days. These calculations were repeated with all the
  • 3.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 3 | Page replicates at the three temperatures at which the experimentation was done. The average embryonation period was obtained by adding up the total for the three replicates and dividing by three. The embryonation periods were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows, to find out if there were significant differences in embryonation period between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests. Fig1The arrangement of egg-hatching containers in the growth chamber for development under controlled temperature with aeration system shown Tests for the length of the larval period Once hatching had taken place, aeration system was put in place to stop scumming and frothing of the larvae rearing water (Fig.6.1). The larvae were fed with a mixture of laboratory chow and yeast at a ratio of 2:1, respectively. Observations made at six hour intervals and the numbers of pupae forming in each of the egg-hatching container were recorded. The larval period was calculated by multiplying the number of pupae at each observation point by the number of days since the larvae were hatched. For example, if at 14.5 days after larvae hatching, 6 pupae had formed the total period is 14.5 x 6= 87, this was done for all the observations, totaled up and divided by the total number of pupae from that particular replicate (container). For example, if in replicate 2 at 20o C a total of 39 pupae formed in a cumulative duration of 608.5 days, the actual larval period for each larva was obtained by 608.5/39= 15.6 days. This means each larva at 20o C lived an average of 15.6 days before pupation set in. This was done for all the replicates at three temperatures. An average larval period at each temperature was calculated by adding up the totals for the three replicates and dividing by three. The larval periods were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the larval periods between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests.
  • 4.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 4 | Page Tests for the length of the pupal period The pupae were moved from the breeding water into beakers within the same growth chamber. Eighteen 2,000 ml and eighteen 10 ml glass beakers were used for the tests. They were divided into three groups of twelve beakers per chamber (six 2,000 ml and six 10 ml beakers). The 12 beakers in each chamber were then divided in two groups each of three 2,000ml and three 10 ml beakers, one group of beakers to hold pupae of Cx. Pipiens pallens and the other pupae of Cx. Pipiens molestus. The 10 ml beaker with about 5.0 ml of clean water was placed inside the 2,000ml beaker. The 2,000ml beakers were then tightly and covered with a piece of cotton cloth and a small slit made in the middle to allow for insertion of an aspirator into the beaker. A ball of cotton wool was used to close the slit to prevent adults from escaping out of the beaker once eclosion occurred. The beaker was then labeled with the name of the species, date of the test, temperature of the chamber, a number corresponding to that of the hatching-container from which the pupae were being transferred and the number of pupae placed therein (e.g. Cx. Pipiens pallens 2009/June/1st , 20o C, beaker 1, 2 or 3, 159 pupae). The pupae were collected with a little water using a large pipette and moved into the 10ml beaker inside the 2,000 ml beaker and then placed inside the growth chamber at the correct test temperature. To feed the emerging adults, the feeding cotton swab used to close the slit was irrigated with 10% sugar water and covered with clear para- film to prevent evaporation and drying up. Observations were made at intervals of six hours and the number of adults emerging recorded until all the pupae underwent eclosion. The length of the pupal period was obtained by adding up the total numbers of adults emerged, in each replicate divided by the total period in days in which all the adults emerged. For example, if at 20o C on day 20, 3.5 days after the pupae were placed in the beaker only 1 adult had emerged the total pupal period is given by 3.5 x 1=3.5 days. This was done for each observation period through the days until no more adults emerged. For example, if a total of 150 adults emerged over an accumulative period of 75 days, the actual pupal period was obtained by 150/75=2.0 days, meaning it took an average 2.0 days for each larva at 20o C to emerge into an adult. This was calculated for all the three replicates at each of the three temperatures. An average for each temperature was obtained by adding up the pupal periods for the three replicates and dividing by three. The pupal periods were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the pupal periods between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests. Tests on survival and maximum longevity of Culex pipiens female mosquitoes After the adults emerged, a new set of experiments was initiated at each temperature to compare survival rates and maximum longevity of the females of Cx. Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus at the three temperatures of 20o C, 24o C and 28o C. Six 500ml beakers were used in each growth chamber. The beakers top was tightly covered with a piece of cotton material with a small slit made at the middle to allow for the insertion of the aspirator to place the females into the beaker. A feeding swab irrigated with 10% sugar water was placed over the slit at the top of the beaker and covered with clear Para film to prevent drying up due to evaporation. Each beaker was labeled with the species name, the date, the temperature and number of adults introduced inside. Females were transferred from the 2,000 ml beakers with an aspirator to the 500ml beakers. The beakers were then placed into the growth chambers. Each test was replicated three times. Observations were made at intervals of 12 hours and the number of dead and live females recorded. These observations were continued for the three temperatures until all the females in all the replicates died. To work out the survival period for the females, the point at which the females died was considered as indicating the number of days they have lived since emergence from pupae. For example if at 28o C, in replicate 2, three females died at day 2, they were considered to have lived for a total of 2 x 3= 6 days. This was calculated for all the days until all the females died. If in replicate 2 of the test at 28o C, had 78 females all dying after an accumulative period of 633 days, average survival in days is given by 663/78= 8.1 days. This means that each female in the replicate lived an average of 8.1 days then died. This was calculated for all the replicates in the three temperatures. An average for each temperature was calculated by adding the survival number of days for the three replicates and then dividing by three. It was taken as longest period in days over which the females in each replicate survived. Maximum longevity was calculated by taking the point of death of the longest surviving females in each replicate and working out an average for the three replicates at each temperature. Statistical Analysis The survival and longevity data were statistically analyzed using t-tests and ANOVAR at p=0.05 using SPSS 12.0 program (SPSS Inc. 2005) for Windows to find out if there were significant differences in the survival periods between the two species and within the same species at the three temperatures used in the tests. III. Results
  • 5.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 5 | Page The results showed that temperature has effects on embryonation, larval and pupal periods as well as the length of survival time in mosquitoes. The results of embryonation periods, larval and pupal period, survival and maximum longevity are given in Tables 1 to 5 below. Table1. Comparison of embryonation periods between Culex pipiens pallens and Culex pipiens molestus eggs under three different temperatures Mean day ± S.D Temp(o C) Cx. pipiens pallens Cx. pipiens molestus 20 2.19 ± 0.27a*A** 2.18 ± 0.28aA 24 1.60 ± 0.23 aA 1.50 ± 0.00aB 28 1.12 ± 0.21aB 1.16 ± 0.28aB *means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different At the 5% level of probability. **means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. . There were no significant differences in the embryonation periods between the two species under each of the three experimental temperatures at p > 0.05. At 20o C, the eggs of Cx. Pipiens pallens took an average of 2.19 days for embryonation while those of Cx. Pipiens pallens took 2.18 days. At 24o C, the eggs of the Cx. Pipiens pallens and Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average of 1.6 and 1.5 days, respectively. At 28o C, the eggs of the two species of Cx. pallens and Cx. molestus took 1.1 and 1.16 days, respectively (Table 1). Within each species, there while no significant differences (p >0.05) in embryonation period between 20o C and 24o C in Cx. Pallens pipiens but there were significant differences between the embryonation period at 20o C and 24o C, and that of 28o C (p < 0.05). In Cx. Pipiens molestus, there were no significant difference in the embryonation period between 28o C and 24o C but the embryonation periods at the two temperatures significantly differed with that at 20o C (Table 1). Table 2. Comparison of the length of the larval period in Culex pipiens pallens and Culex pipiens molestus under three different temperatures Mean day ± S.D Temperature (o C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus 20 16.35 ± 2.20a*A** 17.70 ± 0.60aA 24 9.50 ± 0.70bB 13.60 ± 0.60aB
  • 6.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 6 | Page 28 7.90 ± 0.85aB 9.40 ± 0.40aC *Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different at 5 % level of probability. **Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significantly different at 5 % level of probability. Temperature was found to affect the length of the larval period. There were no significant differences in the larval period between the two species at 20o C with the larvae of Cx. Pipiens pallens living for an average of 16.35 days before undergoing pupation, while those of Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average 17.70days. At 24o C, the larval period for the two species differed significantly with the larvae of Cx. Pipiens pallens taking an average of 9.5 days before pupation, whiles those of Cx. Pipiens molestus took an average of 13.6 days (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the length of the larval stage at 28o C for the species. Within the Cx. Pipiens pallens, there were significant differences in the larval periods between 20o C and 24o C but there were no significant difference between 24o C and 28o C. The length of the larval period differed significantly between 20o C and 28o C. Within the Cx. Pipiens molestus, the length of the larval period differed significantly at all the three temperatures. Table 3. Comparison of the length of the pupal period in Culex pipiens pallens And Culex pipiens molestus at three different temperatures Mean day ±S.D Temperature ( o C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus 20 5.54 ± 0.25b*A** 6.40 ± 0.40aA 24 6.53 ± 0.60aA 4.34 ± 0.32bB ` 28 2.73 ± 0.20bB 2.28 ± 0.67aB *Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different at the 5 % level of probability **Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not significant different at the 5 % level of probability The pupal period seems to have more influence from temperatures. The length of the larval period differed significantly between the two species at all the three temperatures at p < 0.05 (Table 3). Within the individual species, there were no significant differences in the length of the pupal at 20o C and 24o C but the two differed significantly with the pupal period at 28o C in Cx. Pipiens pallens. In Cx. Pipiens molestus, there were no significant differences between the pupal periods at 28o C and 24o C (p> 0.05) but the two differed significantly with the pupal period at 20o C (p < 0.05). Table4. Survival in days of females of two of Culex pipiens complex species at 3 different temperature regimes Mean day ± S.D Temperature ( o C) Cx. pipiens pallens Cx. pipiens molestus 20 18.9 ± 1.6aA 29.2 ± 9.3aA
  • 7.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 7 | Page 24 13.5 ± 4.1aA 9.7 ± 2.2aB 28 7.7 ± 1.1aB 8.6 ± 0.7aB *Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not significantly different at the 5 % level of probability. **Means in the same column followed by the upper case letter are not significantly different at the 5 % level of probability. There were no significant differences in the survival rates between the two species at all three temperatures (p> 0.0. Within the species there were no significant differences in the survival of the Cx. Pipiens pallens at 20o C and 24o C but the two differed significantly with the survival at 28o C. In the Cx. Pipiens molestus the survival differed significantly between 20o C and 24o C but it did not differ significantly between 24o C and 28o C (Table 5and Figs. 2, 3 &4). Fig 2Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 20o C. The survival in the females of the two Cx. pipiens species was inversely proportional to the temperature. More females survived in the lower temperatures than those at higher temperatures while fewer females survived in high temperatures. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 %survival Survival period in Days Culex pipiens molestus Culex pipiens pallens
  • 8.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 8 | Page Fig 3Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 24o C. Fig. 4.Comparison of survival rates of two species members of Culex pipiens complex at 28o C. Table5. Maximum longevity in days by female mosquitoes of two species of Culex pipiens complex Max longevity in days ± S.D Temp (o C) Culex pipiens pallens Culex pipiens molestus 20 37.3 ± 0.6aA 38.3 ± 0.6aA 24 26.3 ± 0.6aB 27.3 ± 0.6aB 28 14.3 ± 0.6a*C** 15.3 ± 0.6aC *Means in the same row followed by the same lower case letter are not different significantly at the 5 % level of probability. **Means in the same column followed by the same upper case letter are not 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 %Survival Survival period in days Culex pipiens molestus Culex pipiens pallens
  • 9.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 9 | Page significantly different at the 5 % of probability The maximum longevity was inversely proportional to the temperatures; as the temperature increases the females of both species of Cx. pipiens tended to live for shorter periods. The longest living females were those reared at 20o C and the shortest living those reared at 28o C. The shortest periods of immature development were observed at 28o C with averages of 7.9 ± 0.9 days (Cx. pipiens pallens) and 9.4 days (Cx. Pipiens molestus), while the longest periods were at 20o C with averages of 16.4 days (Cx. pipiens pallens) and 17.7 days (Cx. pipiens molestus). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the length of both the larval and pupae periods at the three temperatures in each subspecies. However, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the length of the larval period between Cx. pipiens pallens and Cx. pipiens molestus at 20o C and 28o C although these were significantly different at 24o C. The length of the pupal stage differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the two subspecies. These results indicate the ability of the members of theCx. pipiens complex to survive over wide range of temperatures. IV. Discussion From the results, it was evident that temperatures influence egg embryonation, the length of the larval and pupal stages of the mosquito as well as their survival and maximum longevity of the two species of Cx. pipiens. Temperatures have been shown to affect both the biology and the ecology of the Cx. Pipiens complex [20]. The results of this study seem to fall in agreement that at higher temperatures, the mosquitoes’ performance in terms of embryonation, larval and pupal growth is faster yet the mosquitoes generally live for a shorter period. At low temperatures, the mosquitoes took long to go through their life cycle and lived for long. In many parts of the world, the transmission of mosquito borne diseases is seasonal and is linked to rainfall and temperature patterns. Temperature is a key determinant of boundaries of disease transmission and distribution. This is achieved either by limiting the distribution of the vectors or because below certain temperature the pathogen cannot complete its life cycle within the vector. Temperatures have effects on the emergence, survival and the subsequent behavior of the adult Cx. pipiens mosquitoes [21]. This agrees with the findings of our study where in higher temperatures the mosquitoes complete their life cycle faster but also died earlier with the females living for an average of 7.7-8.6 days at 28o C. Higher temperatures are known to shorten the extrinsic incubation period of pathogens within their mosquito vectors [22]. The rearing temperatures influence the vector competence of the mosquitoes [23] as vector’s competence tends to be depressed by decreasing the temperature for adult mosquitoes. In summer when temperatures are high within the tropics, the water temperatures in the containers where the domestic mosquitoes like Cx. Pipiens complex breed tend to increase. This increase as long as it is tolerable, tends to favour their role as disease vectors but certain temperature rises may go way beyond the levels at which the mosquito immature stages can survive [18]. When the larvae of Aedes aegypti were exposed to a range of varying temperatures, mortality was observed to increase with increase with temperatures above certain levels with the temperature being completely lethal at 43o C [18]. Adults reared at higher temperatures tend to be more susceptible to pathogens such as arbovirus and temperature has been thought to act as a selection factor for the mosquitoes responsible for the transmission of diseases like Chikungunya virus. High temperatures induce formation of heat shock proteins in certain mosquitoes such as Anopheles which have been found to contribute to their success as disease pathogen vectors [24]. Similar heat shock proteins induced by rearing mosquitoes under high temperatures have been observed in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus [25]. In tropical regions, where temperatures are often high, the mosquitoes breed in water containers whose water temperature rearing goes beyond the 41o C [18] but supports the disease transmission by mosquitoes in the region. An increase in temperature above the average in an area, where mosquito borne diseases are endemic, could result in a number of events. It could enhance the selection of temperature-tolerant mosquitoes within the mosquitoes’ population with a long longevity. It could also reduce the intrinsic incubation period of the pathogen within the vector mosquitoes which could result in epidemic outbreaks. It could also cause increased susceptibility of the mosquitoes to the pathogens like virus hence increasing their vector competence [26]. Studies using Ochlerotatus albifasciatus mosquitoes showed that the life cycle in these mosquitoes is directly influenced by the ambient temperatures. The length of its life cycle varied from a minimum of 6 days at 24o C to a maximum of 32 days at 13o C [27]. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Kosin University for funding support used in this study, professor Lee Dong Kyu, in whose laboratory this work was done. The authors are also grateful to Daystar University and Kenya Medical Research Institute for their support.
  • 10.
    Effects of Temperatureon the Growth and Development of Culex pipiens Complex Mosquitoes… DOI: 10.9790/3008-10620110 www.iosrjournals.org 10 | Page References [1]. O’Meara GF, Evans LF, Getman AD Jr, Cuda JP. 1995. Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. Aegypti(Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida. J Med Entomol 32: 554 - 562. [2]. Gilbert N, Raworth, DA. 1996. Canadian Entomologist 128 (1): 1-13. [3]. Toma T, Sakamoto S, Miyagi I. 1982. The seasonal abundance of Aedes albopictus in Okinawajima, the Ryukyu archipelago, Japan.Mosq News 42: 179 - 183. [4]. Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75: 1861-1876. [5]. Patz JA, Epstein PR, Burke TA, Balbus J.M. 1996.Global climate change and emerging infectious diseases. JAMA 275: 217 -223. [6]. Hien DS. 1975.Biology of Aedes aegypti(L., 1762) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1865) (Diptera, Culicidae). Acta Parasitol Pol 23: 553 - 568. [7]. Sota T, Mogi M. 1992a. Survival time and resistance to desiccation of diapause and non-diapause eggs of temperate Aedes(Stegomyia) mosquitoes. Entomol Exp Appl 63: 155-161. [8]. Sota T, Mogi M. 1992b.Interspecific variation in desiccation survival time of Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito eggs is correlated with habitat and egg size. Oecologia 90: 353 -358. [9]. Reeves WC, Hardy JL, Reisen WK, Milby MM. 1994. Potential effect of global warming on mosquito-borne arboviruses. J Med Entomol 31: 323 - 332. [10]. Mogi M, Miyagi I, Abadi K, Syafruddin K. 1996. Inter and intraspecific variation in resistance to desiccation by adult Aedes(Stegomyia) spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) from Indonesia. J Med Entomol 33: 53 - 57. [11]. Parker M.B. 1986. Hatchability of eggs of Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae): effects of different temperatures and photoperiods during embryogenesis. Ann EntomolSoc Am 79: 925 - 930. [12]. Rueda LM, Patel KJ, Axtell RC, Stinner RE 1990. Temperature-dependent development and survival rates of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti(Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 27: 892-898. [13]. Crans WJ, Sprenger DA, Mahmood F. 1996. The blood-feeding habits of Aedes sollicitans (Walker) in relation to Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus in coastal areas of New Jersey, II. Results of experiments with caged mosquitoes and the effects of temperature and physiological age on host selection.J Vector Ecol 21: 1 - 5. [14]. Hurlbut HS. 1973. The effect of environmental temperature upon the transmission of St. Louis encephalitis virus by Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. J Med Entomol 10: 1-12. [15]. Hawley WA. 1985. The effect of larval density on adult longevity of a mosquito, Aedes sierrensis: epidemiological consequences. J AnimEcol 54: 955 - 964. [16]. Day JF, Ramsey AM, Zhang J. 1990.Environmentally mediated seasonal variation in mosquito body size.J Environ Entomol 19: 469 - 473. [17]. Majumdar, SK., LS. Kalkstein et al. (1992). Impact of global climate change on human health: spread of infectious disease. Global climate change: Implications, Challenges and mitigation measures. Easton PA, The Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences: 367-370. [18]. Mourya TD, Yadav P, Mishra AC. 2004. Effects of temperature stress on immature stages and susceptibility of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to Chikungunya virus. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7 (4): 346 - 350. [19]. Gerberg, EJ, Bernard DR, Ward RA (1994). Manual for Mosquito Rearing and Experimental techniques; American Mosquito Control Association Bulletin No. 5: 61-62. [20]. Lee DK, Lee WJ. 1992. Overwintering mosquito population of Culex pipiens molestus in the underground structures in Pusan. Korean Journal of Entomology 22: 273 - 279. [21]. Oda T, Uchida K, Mori A. 1999. Effects of high temperature on the emergence and survival of adult Culex pipiens molestus and Culex quinquefasciatus in Japan.J Am Mosq Contr Assoc 15: 153 - 156. [22]. Chamberlin RW, Sudia WD, 1955. The effect of temperature upon the extrinsic incubation of eastern equine encephalitis in mosquitoes. Am J Hyg62: 295 - 305. [23]. Kay BH, Fanning ID, Mottram P, 1989. Rearing temperature influences flavivirus vector competence of mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol3: 415–422. [24]. Nath BB, Lakhotia SC, 1989. Heat shock response in ovarian nurse cells of Anopheles stephensi. J Biosci14: 143–153. [25]. Lan Q, Fallon AM, 1990. Small heat shock proteins distinguishing between two mosquito species and confirm identity of their cell lines. Am J Trop Med Hyg43: 669- 676. [26]. Hardy JL, Houk EJ, Kramer LD, Reeves WC, 1983. Intrinsic factors affecting vector competence of mosquitoes for arboviruses. Annu Rev Entomol28: 229–262. [27]. Soledad FM, Cristina MM, Fischer S, Pablo WO, Schweigmann N. 2000. Effects of flooding and temperature on Aedes albifasciatus development time and larval density in two rain pools at Bueno Aires University City. Mem Inst Cruz 95 (6): 787 – 793.