ERC Starting Grants- a guide quick guide
Download as PPT, PDF5 likes13,882 views
The European Research Council (ERC) is a pan-European funding body that supports excellent researchers and their teams. The ERC provides over €12 billion in funding from 2014-2020 for frontier research projects across all fields. The Starting Grants scheme provides up to €2 million over 5 years to support early career principal investigators establishing their own research team or program. Applicants must have 2-7 years of experience since earning their PhD and demonstrate their potential for research independence and early achievements through publications, patents, and other accomplishments. Evaluation is based solely on scientific excellence and the proposal will undergo a two-stage peer review process.
ERC Starting Grants- a guide quick guide
- 1. An Introduction to the European Research Council and the Starting Grants scheme
- 2. What is the ERC? What is the European Research Council (ERC)? – Pan- European funding organisation – Supports the best in Europe - scientists, engineers and scholars – Funding of €12.7 billion, 2014-2020. €603m available for 2015 STG calls – Independent ERC Council make funding decisions, not EU Policy makers What are the aims of the ERC? – Encourage highest quality research in Europe (excellence is only assessment criteria) – Competitive, flexible funding – Retain, repatriate and recruit (career support) What are the ERC Grant Schemes? – Starting Grants , Consolidator Grants and Advanced Grants • Support for a PI and (if necessary) team members • Investigator-initiated frontier research across all fields of research, on the basis of scientific excellence – Proof of Concept call (for existing ERC grant holders only) – New ‘Synergy Grant’ scheme
- 3. Key Points for ERC Grants • The UK is the best performing country for ERC Grants, with 20% of all grants held by Host Institutions in the UK • Average success rate for ERC grants is 9-10%, the UK average is 15%. Support for a PI to lead their own project and – No need for collaboration or to work with other countries – Team all usually based at the same institution (in EU/AC)… but possible to have team members in other organisations if strongly justified (anywhere in the World - not just EU, AC and ICPC) – Grants available to investigators of any nationality • Investigator driven (bottom-up) substantial advances “Frontier Research” • Excellence is only peer review criterion – 50% for the PI(s) must have an outstanding cv, potential leadership profile & track record – 50% for the Research Project • ERC-funded PIs must be strongly committed to the project and devote a significant amount of time to it. – PI’s funded through the ERC Starting Grants will be expected to spend a minimum 50% of their total working time on the ERC project and a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country.
- 4. ERC Grant Schemes - Starting Grants Starting Independent Researcher Grants • boost the independent careers of excellent researchers • by providing adequate support • at the critical stage where they are starting or consolidating their own independent research team or programme. • Annual calls: opens in November 2014,and closes on 3rd Feb 2015 • Grants of up to €2 million over 5 yrs (but normally €1.5 million, extra available for Capital Equipment if required)
- 6. PI Eligibility Am I a ‘Starter’ or ‘Consolidator’? • During evaluations, applicants will be split into two streams: –“Starter” (2-7 years post PhD) –“Consolidator”(Over 7 and up to 12 years post PhD) Am I Eligible as a PI? • 2-7 yrs from award of first PhD or equivalent • Extensions (up to 16.5 years in total) for properly documented eligible career breaks only: maternity/paternity leave, national service, long-term illness and clinical qualifications. • No extensions for part time working, non-research careers, travel etc *
- 7. Can I apply? Am I a Competitive Candidate, or what do I need to become one? • Expected to have: – already shown potential for research independence & evidence of maturity – produced independently at least one important publication without the participation of their PhD supervisor • Be able to demonstrate a promising track record of early achievements appropriate to their field and career stage, including: – significant publications (as main author) in peer-reviewed major international multidisciplinary journals or leading international journals in their field – May have monographs, invited presentations, granted patents, awards, prizes • Have good leadership potential All this needs to be shown in your application…. …which will include: - a cv - an early achievements track record
- 8. Structure of Application Forms Part A – Administrative and Summary Forms (completed directly onto EPSS) • A1 Proposal & PI information & HI Legal Representative (including abstract) • A2 Host Institution(s) information & PIC (one A2 form per institution) • A3 Budget (summary financial information) Part B1 – Proposal Details (submitted as .pdf) • Cover page & proposal summary • Section 1a-c: The PI – 1a) Extended Synopsis (5 pages – 1b) CV, (2 pages) and Funding ID (1page) – 1c) Early Achievements Track Record (2 pages) Part B2 – Proposal Details (submitted as .pdf) • Section 2 - Scientific Proposal (15 pages, excluding ethical issues table and annex) – State-of-the-art and objectives – Methodology – Resources (including project costs) – Ethical issues table Annexes • Commitment of the Host Institution (template from EPSS, submitted as .pdf) • Ethical Issues Annex (if applicable) (template on EPSS, 2 pages, excl. copies of authorisations)
- 9. How are the applications assessed? Peer review process and structure
- 10. The 25 ERC Panels: Where do you fit in?
- 11. Peer Review Panels - Example of Titles and Keywords
- 12. Independent, remote reviews by panel members (of part B1 only) Panel meetings and ranking Proposals retained for stage 2, or rejected STEP 2 - Evaluation Interviews of PIs (StG only) and panel meetings Domain panel chairs - ranking and selection per domain Proposals selected Independent, remote reviews by panel members and other referees of full proposal (parts B1 and B2) STEP 1 - Evaluation Eligibility check The 2 Stage Evaluation Process 20-25% of proposals will reach Step 2… 35-40% of proposals reaching Step will be successful…
- 13. Peer Review Structure Submission • Single Stage Submission, but 2-Step Peer Review • Electronic Submission via EPSS • Applicant choose a Primary and Secondary Panel (if relevant) Peer Review • 3 research domains • 25 panels across the full range of subject areas. Each panel is subdivided into key areas/keywords that will need to be selected by the applicant Composition of the panels • Each ERC panel consists of a chairman and 10-16 members. The Panel Chair and the Panel Members are selected on the basis of their scientific reputation. • In addition to the Panel Members (who act as “generalists”), the ERC evaluations rely on input from remote experts external to the panel, called referees. They are scientists and scholars who bring in the necessary specialised expertise. • Before the deadline of a call, the names of the panel chairs are published on the ERC website. Names of panel members are published after the evaluation process is concluded. • There are generally two sets of panels that sit in alternate years. For the 2015 call look at the 2013 panels. This will give you a good idea of who will be assessing
- 14. Evaluation Criteria Principal Investigator- 50% • Intellectual capacity and creativity • Commitment Research Project- 50% • Ground breaking nature & potential impact of the research • Methodology
- 15. Curriculum Vitae (2 pages max) and Funding ID (1 page max) • Academic record • Research record •Succinct ‘Funding ID’ – Current research grants – Ongoing applications It is important that the PI should also report on any significant career breaks and/or unconventional career paths. Peer reviewers will take it into consideration during the assessment of the quality of the PI and his/her career progression..
- 16. Starting Grants: Early Achievements Track Record (2 pages max) Benchmarks • Publications, as main author – indicating those without the presence as co-author of their PhD supervisor – in major international peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary scientific journals and/or – in the leading international peer-reviewed journals and/or – peer-reviewed conferences proceedings and/or – research monographs of their respective research fields – also indicating the number of citations (excluding self-citations) they have attracted. • Granted patent(s)* • Invited presentations to peer-reviewed, internationally established conferences and/or international advanced schools* • Prizes and Awards* (*if applicable)
- 17. Structure of the Proposal B1: Extended Synopsis: (5 pages) • Concise presentation of the scientific proposal including the scientific feasibility of the project, • With particular attention to ground-breaking nature of the research project and • How it may open up new horizons or opportunities for research. • Describe the proposed work in the context of the state of the art of the field. • References to literature • Panel will only evaluate Extended Synopsis at step 1. B2: Scientific Proposal (15 pages) • State-of-the-art and objectives • Methodology • Resources (including project costs) • Ethical issues table
- 18. Hints and Tips PI Criteria • There is no room for modesty, sell yourself! • Get plenty of feedback while drafting, and leave plenty of time to write and incorporate it • Be clear- clear title, clear abstract, clear plan. The reviewers may not be experts in your field… • Check the previous review panels to know who may be assessing your application • If you refer to journal impact factors, state which one you are using • Added a link to your website? Keep it up to date!
- 19. European Research Council National Contact Point Helpdesk – Website http://www.ukro.ac.uk/erc – ERC mailing list for events and key updates (sign up at http://www.ukro.ac.uk/erc/Pages/erc_newsletter_registration.aspx ) – Helpdesk via email and telephone (email [email protected] or phone 0032 2289 6121) – Specialist training courses and information events UKResearchOffice–ERCNCP • Advice on applying for ERC actions • Eligibility • Application help • Results • Contractual issues • Advice to those with ERC grants
- 20. Further Information UK ERC NCP Website http://www.ukro.ac.uk/erc UK ERC NCP Newsletter http://www.ukro.ac.uk/erc/Pages/erc_newsletter_registration.aspx ERC Website http://erc.europa.eu ERC Europa Helpdesk http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?lg=en&pg=enquiries Starting Grant Guide for Applicants http://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/info_for_applicants_stg_cog_2014.pdf • UKRO Information Services (For UKRO subscribers) http://ims.ukro.ac.uk
- 21. Support sources at Northumbria • The Research and Funding Policy Team regularly update a blog with opportunities, events, training and guidance. You can also subscribe for regular updates: http://research.northumbria.ac.uk/support/ • Each faculty has an assigned Research and Funding Policy Manager who can offer advice on opportunities, funders and the early stages of writing proposals: http://research.northumbria.ac.uk/support/about/meet-the-team/ • Research Professional is a system the University subscribes to that can help you find the right funding opportunity for you: http://research.northumbria.ac.uk/support/2014/03/26/this-is-the-grant-you-were-looking- for-research-professional/