FAIRsharing: what we do for policies

FAIRsharing: what we do for policies

• 1.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Monitoring EOSC readiness: FAIR data policies - 17 Feb 2022 FAIRsharing: what we do for policies Allyson Lister, PhD FAIRsharing - Content and Community Coordinator; Senior Knowledge Engineer; ORCiD: 0000-0002-7702-4495 @FAIRsharing_org [email protected] 10.25504/FAIRsharing.2abjs5 Prof. Susanna-A Sansone, PhD FAIRsharing - Founder; Professor of Data Readiness; ORCiD: 0000-0002-7702-4495 datareadiness.eng.ox.ac.uk CC BY-SA 4.0 International
• 2.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International An informative and educational resource, and a service FAIRsharing provides curated descriptions and relationship graphs of standards, databases and policies in all disciplines COMMUNITY STANDARDS POLICIES by funders, journals and other organizations DATABASES including repositories and knowledgebases Identifiers Terminologies Guidelines Formats
• 3.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International FAIRsharing: part of EOSC and the research ecosystem Users, adopters, community and activities: An endorsed output of the FAIRsharing WG (since 2015): A WG (since 2015) in: Researchers in academia, industry and government Developers & curators of resources and tools Research data facilitators, librarians, trainers Society, unions and community alliances Journal publishers and organisations with data policies Funders and data policy makers A recommended resource in EOSC reports Used by all stakeholder groups https://fairsharing.org/communities
• 4.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Guides consumers to discover, select and use these resources with confidence Helps producers to make their resources more visible, more widely adopted and cited Promoting use and value of databases, standards, policies Total of over 3584 resources (Feb 2022) repositories standards policie s
• 5.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.pj0zs Funder policy: an example
• 6.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.pj0zs Funder policy: an example
• 7.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.pj0zs Funder policy: the value of our graphs Maturity status Record type Relationships
• 8.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.pj0zs Maturity status Record type Relationships Funder policy: the value of our graphs
• 9.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.pj0zs A collection representing the standards and databases used by this UK study, which complies with the Wellcome policy Maturity status Record type Relationships Funder policy: the value of our graphs
• 10.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Policy classification and metadata Classifying policies is key, because there is a mixture of types and focus ● Broader or specific, covering one or more digital objects ● Their depth and coverage vary depending on organisation and context in which are developed Metadata fields include: ● Organization(s) ● Country ● Coverage ○ Discipline(s) coverage ○ Digital object type ● Related records ○ Standards ○ Databases ○ Other policies
• 11.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Their needs: ● Make their recommendations transparent ○ list examples or all of their recommended standards and repositories ● Keep abreast of the dynamic landscape of standards and repositories ○ monitor evolution of these resources, e.g. new, deprecated, merged ○ update and evolve their recommendations, adapting to needs of the community they serve Policies registration: why organisations use FAIRsharing
• 12.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International What we offer: ● Citability via DOI ● Discoverability of the policies by humans and machines ● Flexible but clearer descriptions of the policies and what they recommend ● Relationships to the repositories and standards recommended ● Comparability of one policy to another (in development) Policies registration: why organisations use FAIRsharing
• 13.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Findability Sitemap.xml, JSON Markup with Schema.org for search indexes DOI unique persistent identifiers for each record ORCID for author credit and authentication Accessibility read/write REST API read OAI-PMH Interoperability JSON markup Standardized semantics Cross-links to or import from records in other registries ROR for organizations (ongoing) FundRef for funders (ongoing) Reusability CC BY 4.0 license JSON export FAIRness of FAIRsharing: machine-accessible content
• 14.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International To summarise: role of FAIRsharing and lessons learned We can engage with policy stakeholders, many of which are already our users We can prototype and implement a common template for all types of policy, when this emerges We can provide registration to enable: ● Citability ● Discoverability ● Flexible and clearer descriptions ● Relationships ● Machine readability ● Comparability
• 15.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International To summarise: role of FAIRsharing and lessons learned We can engage with policy stakeholders, many of which are already our users We can prototype and implement a common template for all types of policy, when this emerges We can provide registration to enable: ● Citability ● Discoverability ● Flexible and clearer descriptions ● Relationships ● Machine readability ● Comparability Curating, describing, tagging, classifying the policies is not trivial. These activities need funding! Can we converge towards a common system and template,which works for all policy-makers? Maintaining the description up-to-date and monitoring evolution of each policy require continued engagement and curation
• 16.
  CC BY-SA 4.0International Stakeholder Advisors ● Amye Kenall, VP of Publishing and Product, Research Square ● Adam Leary, Oxford University Press ● Catriona MacCallum, Hindawi ● Dagmar Meyer, European Research Council, Executive Agency ● Dominic Fripp, JISC, UK ● Emma Ganley, Protocols.io ● Geraldine Clement-Stoneham, Medical Research Council ● Helena Cousijn, DataCite ● Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, PLoS ● Imma Subirats, FAO of the United Nations ● Kiera McNiece, Cambridge University Press ● Luiz Olavo Bonino, GO-FAIR ● Marina Soares E Silva and Sarah Callaghan, Elsevier ● Michael Ball, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council ● Mike Huerta, NIH National Library of Medicine ● Molly Cranston and Guillaume Wright, F1000Research ● Nick Everitt and Matthew Cannon, Taylor and Francis ● Scott Edmunds, GigaScience, Oxford University Press ● Simon Hodson, CODATA ● Theo Bloom, British Medical Journal ● Thomas Lemberger, EMBO Press ● Wei-Mun Chan, eLife ● Sowmya Swaminathan, Springer Nature Operational Team ● Allyson Lister, Content and Community Lead ● Milo Thurston, Technical Lead ● Ramon Granell, Data Enrichment & Quality Manager ● Delphine Dauga, Data Curator Manager ● Hossein Mirian, Web Developer ● Dominique Batista, Research Software Engineer ● Philippe Rocca-Serra, Co-Founder ● Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PI and Founder ● and many collaborators and contributors! Executive Advisors ● Varsha Khodiyar, HDRUK ● David Carr, Independent expert ● Chris Graf, Springer Nature ● Marta Teperek, Data Stewardship Coordinator, TUDelft ● Robert Hanisch, Director, NIST Office of Data & Informatics ● Peter McQuilton, FAIRsharing Founding Member, GSK