Fallon Brainfood—trends, ideas, opportunities, and
thought leadership for our brands.
Brainfood is our all-agency food-for-thought.
Where we’ve been in recent years:
Being Digital // Social 10 // Virtuality // Design For All //
China Rising // Fall0nylitics // Mobile 10 // The iTV Opportunity //
How Customer Service Will Save Luxury // Startup and Never Stop //
and more
Upcoming:
Coupons 2.0 // How to Make Contagious Ideas // UX and You //
How to Build Apps //
Missed previous Brainfoods?
Go to http://www.slideshare.net/group/we-are-fallon
Brainfood: TV 2.0
Five Scenarios for the Future of Television
March 29, 2011
What we’ve learned about the evolution
of TV in the age of the social Web.
  The “Death” of TV is highly overrated
  Evolving Reality of Digital “Co-Viewing”
  Five “What If?” Scenarios for The Future of TV
We are…
Rocky Novak
Director of Digital Development
Aki Spicer
Director of Digital Strategy
Jacob Abernathy
Creative Technologist
“The shock that the Internet caused
[to the industry] is still not finished. We
need to be ahead of the curve; otherwise,
we will not be able to accompany the
client of tomorrow.”
Maurice Levy
CEO, Publicis Groupe
6
.
But predictions of TV’s demise
were premature…
Pay people to live without TV?
The reality is that people won’t go without it.
7 Days 5 Days 2 Days
2 Days—the longest people would willingly go without TV
(even for cash)
Conclusion: TV is still a vital part of our lives,
but TV is also changing.
Excerpted from presentations by Razorfish at SXSW
Why? DNA of TV: Nine Immutable Genes.
1.  Relaxation, zoning out, passivity
2.  Conversation
3.  Events, currency, what's happening now
4.  Social, excuse to be together
5.  Stimulation and education
6.  Vicarious Experience, escapism/fantasy
7.  Passion Points
8.  Participation
9.  Consumerism
Excerpted from presentations by Razorfish at SXSW
11
Liminal Space
Viewing Participation Advocacy
Brands today and tomorrow must convert
viewers to users and users to advocates.
But advocacy isn’t free:
It comes when value compels evangelism.
“The Internet is not cannibalistic;
it is only additive. We view the Internet
as a lab for our TV network…
The Internet can help the network
and vice versa.”
Les Moonves
CEO, CBS
only now, many of those
conversations are digital,
and thus more powerful.
TV still dictates the
conversations we’re
having—
1/3 of our day spent online;
imposed new expectations on
traditional TV (on-demand,
DVR, 2-way, etc.)
Branded Entertainment:
Webisodes, engagement
platforms, videos as
“content”
# 4 largest site
# 2 search site
# 1 largest video site
5B streams/month
70% of TV viewers
are Web surfing as
they watch
# 2 largest video site
5.5B streams/month
Middle-agers fastest growth
Line between content and
advertising is blurring, as
is line between TV and
Web
Yet, digital and social has wrought
seismic shifts upon our beloved TV.
55% people have
broadband access;
90% by 2012
55% people have
broadband access;
90% by 2012
86% of TV viewers
are using mobile
device as they
watch
The best-in-class TV shows combine
their DNA with the “people add value”
principle of Web 2.0.
What makes these #winning ideas
for our times?
We are social animals.
Human experiences are better together.
The brands that are winning
today understand this.
Because on the social Web, people add value,
and the brands that win are
creating ideas and experiences that get
better the more people use them.
So what is next for television?
“The future is here. It’s just not evenly
distributed yet.”
William Gibson
Writer and Futurist
23
#1 Fan Couch Potato
Social Butterfly
TVDJ
Play Along TV
puts you in
the game/event
Smarter TV, serves mood
and preference
Viewing Party TV puts content
in context of your social circle
Curate and AddTo TV
lets users drive
Info Junkie
News at the
nexus of
historic truths
+
Play along with TV and (really) get
in on the action.
#1 Fan
#1 Fan
Implications of #1 Fan:
  Don’t just watch—play along
  Go deep(er) into the action
  Tight-knit community of passions
  We’re all the show now
  Ad-ded value, too
Personalized TV defined by mood, likes, and
history—not time grid and alphabet order.
Couch Potato
#2 Couch Potato
Implications of Couch Potato:
  “Lean-back” meets “lean-forward”
  User at the center
  Hyper-contextual relevance is king
  Behavioral targeting is queen
  Cross-platform integration
TV Viewing Party puts content in context
of your social circle.
Social Butterfly
#3 Social Butterfly
Implications of Social Butterfly
  Let people in
  Return to the “live” shared viewing experience
  Social deconstruction and bookmarking
  UGC forces a rethink on “piracy”
  Real-time “buzz” is critical
Users curate, co-create, and drive
the TV show.
TVDJ
#4 TVDJ
Implications of TVDJ:
  Engagement beyond “The 61st Minute”
  User deconstruction and bookmarking
  DVR and time-displacement—our new friend
  Ad-ded value, too
  Content as a platform (think George Lucas
and Gene Roddenberry)
News at the nexus of historical context
Info Junkie
+
“History is the only true philosophy.”
Osker Spicer
Father, Lifelong News Journalist
39
#4 TVDJ
Implications of Info Junkie:
  News in greater context to historical nodes
  Live news in context of multiple points of view
  From news to truths—user-controlled deconstruction
and analysis (think Politifact and Politics for Dummies)
  Cross-referencing demands transparency over spin
  Firehose of content unlocks sponsorship opportunities
Insights for advertisers from the
“unevenly distributed” future of TV.
  Platforms collide in content and interface
  Into real life
  Better together
  People will be channels
  Will know who we're talking to
  Real-time brands
  Sponsors still vital
  Sponsored value
  :30 is a random number
  30:00 and 60:00 are equally random numbers
Concluding notes on TV in
the age of the Internet.
  TV not dead—alive and thriving
  Digital is the best sidekick TV could have
  “The Future” is already underway
  You are now shaping what’s next
Thanks.
http://www.slideshare.net/group/we-are-fallon
Let's continue the conversation.
#TV2.0 @akispicer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/akispicer
http://www.fallon.com
Find this and other Fallon Brainfood presentations:
@rockynovak
http://www.linkedin.com/in/rockynovak
@jacobabernathy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jacobabernathy
Fallon Brainfood: TV 2.0 – Scenarios for the Future of Television

Fallon Brainfood: TV 2.0 – Scenarios for the Future of Television

  • 2.
    Fallon Brainfood—trends, ideas,opportunities, and thought leadership for our brands. Brainfood is our all-agency food-for-thought. Where we’ve been in recent years: Being Digital // Social 10 // Virtuality // Design For All // China Rising // Fall0nylitics // Mobile 10 // The iTV Opportunity // How Customer Service Will Save Luxury // Startup and Never Stop // and more Upcoming: Coupons 2.0 // How to Make Contagious Ideas // UX and You // How to Build Apps // Missed previous Brainfoods? Go to http://www.slideshare.net/group/we-are-fallon
  • 3.
    Brainfood: TV 2.0 FiveScenarios for the Future of Television March 29, 2011
  • 4.
    What we’ve learnedabout the evolution of TV in the age of the social Web.   The “Death” of TV is highly overrated   Evolving Reality of Digital “Co-Viewing”   Five “What If?” Scenarios for The Future of TV
  • 5.
    We are… Rocky Novak Directorof Digital Development Aki Spicer Director of Digital Strategy Jacob Abernathy Creative Technologist
  • 6.
    “The shock thatthe Internet caused [to the industry] is still not finished. We need to be ahead of the curve; otherwise, we will not be able to accompany the client of tomorrow.” Maurice Levy CEO, Publicis Groupe 6
  • 7.
  • 8.
    But predictions ofTV’s demise were premature…
  • 9.
    Pay people tolive without TV? The reality is that people won’t go without it. 7 Days 5 Days 2 Days 2 Days—the longest people would willingly go without TV (even for cash) Conclusion: TV is still a vital part of our lives, but TV is also changing. Excerpted from presentations by Razorfish at SXSW
  • 10.
    Why? DNA ofTV: Nine Immutable Genes. 1.  Relaxation, zoning out, passivity 2.  Conversation 3.  Events, currency, what's happening now 4.  Social, excuse to be together 5.  Stimulation and education 6.  Vicarious Experience, escapism/fantasy 7.  Passion Points 8.  Participation 9.  Consumerism Excerpted from presentations by Razorfish at SXSW
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Viewing Participation Advocacy Brandstoday and tomorrow must convert viewers to users and users to advocates. But advocacy isn’t free: It comes when value compels evangelism.
  • 13.
    “The Internet isnot cannibalistic; it is only additive. We view the Internet as a lab for our TV network… The Internet can help the network and vice versa.” Les Moonves CEO, CBS
  • 14.
    only now, manyof those conversations are digital, and thus more powerful. TV still dictates the conversations we’re having—
  • 15.
    1/3 of ourday spent online; imposed new expectations on traditional TV (on-demand, DVR, 2-way, etc.) Branded Entertainment: Webisodes, engagement platforms, videos as “content” # 4 largest site # 2 search site # 1 largest video site 5B streams/month 70% of TV viewers are Web surfing as they watch # 2 largest video site 5.5B streams/month Middle-agers fastest growth Line between content and advertising is blurring, as is line between TV and Web Yet, digital and social has wrought seismic shifts upon our beloved TV. 55% people have broadband access; 90% by 2012 55% people have broadband access; 90% by 2012 86% of TV viewers are using mobile device as they watch
  • 16.
    The best-in-class TVshows combine their DNA with the “people add value” principle of Web 2.0.
  • 17.
    What makes these#winning ideas for our times?
  • 18.
    We are socialanimals.
  • 19.
    Human experiences arebetter together.
  • 20.
    The brands thatare winning today understand this.
  • 21.
    Because on thesocial Web, people add value, and the brands that win are creating ideas and experiences that get better the more people use them.
  • 22.
    So what isnext for television?
  • 23.
    “The future ishere. It’s just not evenly distributed yet.” William Gibson Writer and Futurist 23
  • 25.
    #1 Fan CouchPotato Social Butterfly TVDJ Play Along TV puts you in the game/event Smarter TV, serves mood and preference Viewing Party TV puts content in context of your social circle Curate and AddTo TV lets users drive Info Junkie News at the nexus of historic truths +
  • 26.
    Play along withTV and (really) get in on the action. #1 Fan
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Implications of #1Fan:   Don’t just watch—play along   Go deep(er) into the action   Tight-knit community of passions   We’re all the show now   Ad-ded value, too
  • 29.
    Personalized TV definedby mood, likes, and history—not time grid and alphabet order. Couch Potato
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Implications of CouchPotato:   “Lean-back” meets “lean-forward”   User at the center   Hyper-contextual relevance is king   Behavioral targeting is queen   Cross-platform integration
  • 32.
    TV Viewing Partyputs content in context of your social circle. Social Butterfly
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Implications of SocialButterfly   Let people in   Return to the “live” shared viewing experience   Social deconstruction and bookmarking   UGC forces a rethink on “piracy”   Real-time “buzz” is critical
  • 35.
    Users curate, co-create,and drive the TV show. TVDJ
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Implications of TVDJ:  Engagement beyond “The 61st Minute”   User deconstruction and bookmarking   DVR and time-displacement—our new friend   Ad-ded value, too   Content as a platform (think George Lucas and Gene Roddenberry)
  • 38.
    News at thenexus of historical context Info Junkie +
  • 39.
    “History is theonly true philosophy.” Osker Spicer Father, Lifelong News Journalist 39
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Implications of InfoJunkie:   News in greater context to historical nodes   Live news in context of multiple points of view   From news to truths—user-controlled deconstruction and analysis (think Politifact and Politics for Dummies)   Cross-referencing demands transparency over spin   Firehose of content unlocks sponsorship opportunities
  • 42.
    Insights for advertisersfrom the “unevenly distributed” future of TV.   Platforms collide in content and interface   Into real life   Better together   People will be channels   Will know who we're talking to   Real-time brands   Sponsors still vital   Sponsored value   :30 is a random number   30:00 and 60:00 are equally random numbers
  • 43.
    Concluding notes onTV in the age of the Internet.   TV not dead—alive and thriving   Digital is the best sidekick TV could have   “The Future” is already underway   You are now shaping what’s next
  • 44.
  • 45.
    http://www.slideshare.net/group/we-are-fallon Let's continue theconversation. #TV2.0 @akispicer http://www.linkedin.com/in/akispicer http://www.fallon.com Find this and other Fallon Brainfood presentations: @rockynovak http://www.linkedin.com/in/rockynovak @jacobabernathy http://www.linkedin.com/in/jacobabernathy