FLOW PROPERTIES OF POWDERS
By-Dr. Smita D. More
Dept of Pharmaceutics
PES, Moedren College of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi
• Powders may be free-flowing or cohesive (Sticky).
• Many common manufacturing problems are attributes to
powder flow.
1. Powder transfer through large equipment such as hopper.
2. Uneven powder flow  excess entrapped air within
powders  capping or lamination.
3. Uneven powder flow  increase particle’s friction with
die wall causing lubrication problems and increase dust
contamination risks during powder transfer.
4. Powder storage, which for example result in
caking tendencies within a vial or bag after
shipping or storage time.
5. Separation of small quantity of the powder
from the bulk-specifically just before the
creation of individual doses such as during
tableting, encapsulation and vial filling which
affect the weight uniformity of the dose (under
or over dosage).
Powder flow problems
• Tests to evaluate the flowability of a powder.
1. Carr’s compressibility index.
2. Hausner ratio.
3. The angle of repose ().
Carr’s compressibility index
• A volume of powder is filled into a graduated glass
cylinder and repeatedly tapped for a known
duration. The volume of powder after tapping is
measure.
Tapped density- Poured or bulk density
Carr’s index (%)= X 100
Tapped density
Bulk density= weight/bulk volume
Tapped density=weight/true volume
Carr’s compressibility index
Flow description % Compressibility
Excellent flow 5 – 15
Good 16 – 18
Fair 19 – 21
Poor 22 – 35
Very Poor 36 -40
Extremely poor  40
Relationship between powder flowability and % compressibility
Hausner ratio
Tapped density
Hausner ratio =
Poured or bulk density
Hausner ratio was related to interparticle friction:
• Value less than 1.25 indicates good flow (=20% Carr).
Hausner ratio
• The powder with low interparticle friction, such as
coarse spheres.
• Value greater than 1.5 indicates poor flow (= 33%
Carr’s Compressibility Index)).
• More cohesive, less free-flowing powders such as
flakes.
• Between 1.25 and 1.5 added glidant normally
improves flow.
•  1.5 added glidant doesn’t improve flow.
The angle of repose ()
• The sample is poured onto the
horizontal surface and the angle
of the resulting pyramid is
measured.
• The user normally selects the
funnel orifice through which the
powder flows slowly and
reasonably constantly.
The angle of repose ()
1. Angle of repose less than 20 (Excellent flow).
2. Angle of repose between20-30 (Good flow).
3. Angle of repose between 30-40 (Pass flow).
4. Angle of repose greater than 40 (Poor flow).
• The rougher and more irregular the surface of
the particles, the higher will be the angle of
repose.
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Improvement
of
Powder Flowabilty
Particle’s
size &
Distribution
Particle
Shape &
texture
Surface
forces
Flow
Activators
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
1. Alteration of Particle’s size & Distribution
2. Alteration of Particle shape & texture
3. Alteration of Surface Forces
4. Formulation additives (Flow activators)
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Alteration of Particle’s size & Distribution
• There is certain particle size at which powder’s flow
ability is optimum.
• Coarse particles are more preferred than fine ones as
they are less cohesive.
• The size distribution can also be altered to improve
flowability by removing a proportion of the fine
particle fraction or by increasing the proportion of
coarser particle’s such as occurs in granulation.
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Alteration of Particle shape & texture
Particle’s Shape
• Generally, more spherical particles have better flow
properties than more irregular particles.
• Spherical particles are obtained by spray drying, or
by temperature cycling crystallization.
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Alteration of Particle shape & texture
Particle’s texture
• Particles with very rough surfaces will be more
cohesive and have a greater tendency to
interlock than smooth surfaced particles.
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Alteration of Surface Forces
• Reduction of electrostatic charges can improve powder
flowability.
• Electrostatic charges can be reduced by altering process
conditions to reduce frictional contacts.
• Moisture content of particle greatly affects powder’s flowability.
• Adsorbed surface moisture films tend to increase bulk density
and reduce porosity.
• Drying the particles will reduce the cohesiveness and improve
the flow.
• Hygroscopic powder’s stored and processed under low humidity
conditions.
Factors affecting the flow
properties of powder
Formulation additives (Flow activators)
• Flow activators are commonly referred as a
glidants.
• Flow activators improve the flowability of
powders by reducing adhesion and cohesion.
e. g. Talc, maize starch and magnesium stearate.
Derived properties of powders
References
1. Text book of Physical Pharmaceutics by CVS
Subramanyam.
2. Text book of Physical Pharmacy By Albert
Martin.
3. www.google.com.

Flow properties of powders

  • 1.
    FLOW PROPERTIES OFPOWDERS By-Dr. Smita D. More Dept of Pharmaceutics PES, Moedren College of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi
  • 2.
    • Powders maybe free-flowing or cohesive (Sticky). • Many common manufacturing problems are attributes to powder flow. 1. Powder transfer through large equipment such as hopper. 2. Uneven powder flow  excess entrapped air within powders  capping or lamination. 3. Uneven powder flow  increase particle’s friction with die wall causing lubrication problems and increase dust contamination risks during powder transfer.
  • 3.
    4. Powder storage,which for example result in caking tendencies within a vial or bag after shipping or storage time. 5. Separation of small quantity of the powder from the bulk-specifically just before the creation of individual doses such as during tableting, encapsulation and vial filling which affect the weight uniformity of the dose (under or over dosage).
  • 4.
  • 5.
    • Tests toevaluate the flowability of a powder. 1. Carr’s compressibility index. 2. Hausner ratio. 3. The angle of repose ().
  • 6.
    Carr’s compressibility index •A volume of powder is filled into a graduated glass cylinder and repeatedly tapped for a known duration. The volume of powder after tapping is measure. Tapped density- Poured or bulk density Carr’s index (%)= X 100 Tapped density Bulk density= weight/bulk volume Tapped density=weight/true volume
  • 7.
    Carr’s compressibility index Flowdescription % Compressibility Excellent flow 5 – 15 Good 16 – 18 Fair 19 – 21 Poor 22 – 35 Very Poor 36 -40 Extremely poor  40 Relationship between powder flowability and % compressibility
  • 8.
    Hausner ratio Tapped density Hausnerratio = Poured or bulk density Hausner ratio was related to interparticle friction: • Value less than 1.25 indicates good flow (=20% Carr).
  • 9.
    Hausner ratio • Thepowder with low interparticle friction, such as coarse spheres. • Value greater than 1.5 indicates poor flow (= 33% Carr’s Compressibility Index)). • More cohesive, less free-flowing powders such as flakes. • Between 1.25 and 1.5 added glidant normally improves flow. •  1.5 added glidant doesn’t improve flow.
  • 10.
    The angle ofrepose () • The sample is poured onto the horizontal surface and the angle of the resulting pyramid is measured. • The user normally selects the funnel orifice through which the powder flows slowly and reasonably constantly.
  • 11.
    The angle ofrepose () 1. Angle of repose less than 20 (Excellent flow). 2. Angle of repose between20-30 (Good flow). 3. Angle of repose between 30-40 (Pass flow). 4. Angle of repose greater than 40 (Poor flow). • The rougher and more irregular the surface of the particles, the higher will be the angle of repose.
  • 12.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Improvement of Powder Flowabilty Particle’s size & Distribution Particle Shape & texture Surface forces Flow Activators
  • 13.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder 1. Alteration of Particle’s size & Distribution 2. Alteration of Particle shape & texture 3. Alteration of Surface Forces 4. Formulation additives (Flow activators)
  • 14.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Alteration of Particle’s size & Distribution • There is certain particle size at which powder’s flow ability is optimum. • Coarse particles are more preferred than fine ones as they are less cohesive. • The size distribution can also be altered to improve flowability by removing a proportion of the fine particle fraction or by increasing the proportion of coarser particle’s such as occurs in granulation.
  • 15.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Alteration of Particle shape & texture Particle’s Shape • Generally, more spherical particles have better flow properties than more irregular particles. • Spherical particles are obtained by spray drying, or by temperature cycling crystallization.
  • 16.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Alteration of Particle shape & texture Particle’s texture • Particles with very rough surfaces will be more cohesive and have a greater tendency to interlock than smooth surfaced particles.
  • 17.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Alteration of Surface Forces • Reduction of electrostatic charges can improve powder flowability. • Electrostatic charges can be reduced by altering process conditions to reduce frictional contacts. • Moisture content of particle greatly affects powder’s flowability. • Adsorbed surface moisture films tend to increase bulk density and reduce porosity. • Drying the particles will reduce the cohesiveness and improve the flow. • Hygroscopic powder’s stored and processed under low humidity conditions.
  • 18.
    Factors affecting theflow properties of powder Formulation additives (Flow activators) • Flow activators are commonly referred as a glidants. • Flow activators improve the flowability of powders by reducing adhesion and cohesion. e. g. Talc, maize starch and magnesium stearate.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    References 1. Text bookof Physical Pharmaceutics by CVS Subramanyam. 2. Text book of Physical Pharmacy By Albert Martin. 3. www.google.com.