FOG COMPUTING
PRESENTED BY,
SABA FARHEEN MUNSHI
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF,
PROF. V SASWADE
SHRI SHIVAJI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND
MANAGEMENT STUDIES
CONTENTS:
 Abstract.
 Introduction.
 Existing System
 Disadvantages
 Proposed System with Advantages
 Cloud verses Fog Computing
 Conclusion.
 Future Enhancement.
 References.
ABSTRACT:
Fog Computing is a paradigm that extends
Cloud computing and services to the edge of the network. Similar
to Cloud, Fog provides data, compute, storage, and application
services to end-users. Examples include phones, online shopping
system, smart traffic light in vehicular network and software defined
network.
INTRODUCTION:
 CISCO system introduced the term ”Fog Computing” as new model to ease
wireless data transfer to distributed devices in the Internet of Things (IoT)
network paradigm.
 In Fog Computing, devices communicate peer-to-peer to efficiently share
or store data and take local decisions.
Fog
Cloud
Locations
Edge
Core
EXISTING SYSTEM
 Cloud computing has provided many opportunities for enterprises by
offering their customers a range of computing services. Current “pay-as-
you-go”.
 Cloud computing model becomes an efficient alternative to owning and
managing private data centers for customers facing Web applications
DISADVANTAGES:
 It does not verify whether the user was authorized or not.
 No body is identified when the attack is happen.
 We can not detect which file was hacking.
 Data latency
 Security issues
PROPOSED SYSTEM WITH ADVANTAGES:
 Improved security of encrypted data as it stay closer to the end-user.
 Reduction in data movement across the network.
 Fog devices are geographically distributed over heterogeneous platform.
 It provides low latency, location awareness, and improves quality-of-
services (QoS) and real time applications.
CLOUD VS FOG:
CONCLUSION:
 We have analysed fog computing and its real time applications.
 Fog computing performs better than cloud computing.
 Fog computing will grow in helping the network paradigms that require
faster processing.
FUTURE ENCHANCEMENT:
 Future work will expand on the Fog computing paradigm in Smart Grid,
Smart cities, Smart home, Traffic signals, Wireless sensor network,
Software define network(SDNs) , IoT.
 Next, Fog computing based SDN in vehicular networks will receive due
attention.
REFERENCES :
[1] Wikipedia.com
[2] IEEE papers
Thank You…

Fog ppt

  • 1.
    FOG COMPUTING PRESENTED BY, SABAFARHEEN MUNSHI UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF, PROF. V SASWADE SHRI SHIVAJI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
  • 2.
    CONTENTS:  Abstract.  Introduction. Existing System  Disadvantages  Proposed System with Advantages  Cloud verses Fog Computing  Conclusion.  Future Enhancement.  References.
  • 3.
    ABSTRACT: Fog Computing isa paradigm that extends Cloud computing and services to the edge of the network. Similar to Cloud, Fog provides data, compute, storage, and application services to end-users. Examples include phones, online shopping system, smart traffic light in vehicular network and software defined network.
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION:  CISCO systemintroduced the term ”Fog Computing” as new model to ease wireless data transfer to distributed devices in the Internet of Things (IoT) network paradigm.  In Fog Computing, devices communicate peer-to-peer to efficiently share or store data and take local decisions.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    EXISTING SYSTEM  Cloudcomputing has provided many opportunities for enterprises by offering their customers a range of computing services. Current “pay-as- you-go”.  Cloud computing model becomes an efficient alternative to owning and managing private data centers for customers facing Web applications
  • 7.
    DISADVANTAGES:  It doesnot verify whether the user was authorized or not.  No body is identified when the attack is happen.  We can not detect which file was hacking.  Data latency  Security issues
  • 8.
    PROPOSED SYSTEM WITHADVANTAGES:  Improved security of encrypted data as it stay closer to the end-user.  Reduction in data movement across the network.  Fog devices are geographically distributed over heterogeneous platform.  It provides low latency, location awareness, and improves quality-of- services (QoS) and real time applications.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    CONCLUSION:  We haveanalysed fog computing and its real time applications.  Fog computing performs better than cloud computing.  Fog computing will grow in helping the network paradigms that require faster processing.
  • 11.
    FUTURE ENCHANCEMENT:  Futurework will expand on the Fog computing paradigm in Smart Grid, Smart cities, Smart home, Traffic signals, Wireless sensor network, Software define network(SDNs) , IoT.  Next, Fog computing based SDN in vehicular networks will receive due attention.
  • 12.
  • 13.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 * If any of these issues caused a schedule delay or need to be discussed further, include details in next slide.