Fringe eu procurement - sara piller
- 1. Evaluation of public procurement Directives DG Internal Market UK LGA Annual Conference Thursday 30 June 2011
- 2. Lu xe m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 bo ur g M Cz a ec lta h Re p Be . lg iu m Fr an ce Ic el an d Ire la n Fi d nl a G nd er m an y Po la nd Au st ria Es to ni a No rw ay Sl ov Ne e th nia er la nd Sw s ed e Authorities EE n A- 3 Hu 0 ng ar y Sp Firms a Pwc, London Economics, Ecorys from OJEU data De in nm ar k UK La tv Li i th a ua n Ro ia m an P o ia Sl rtug ov a ak l Re p. G re ec e Ita ly Cy 2006-2010 pr u Bu s lg ar Average person days for procedure ia
- 3. Person-days required Best Worst Difference performer performer Authorities 11 68 57 Firm 10 43 33 Authorities and 22 93 71 winning firm combined PwC, London Economics, Ecorys
- 4. Total cost of procedures Average cost per procedure €28 000 €22 500 - cost of average 5 – 6 bids € 5 500 contracting authority costs Total Costs €5.3 billion Less than 1.3% of total contract value
- 5. Savings Econometric model Save 1% on the final contract value if contract notice advertised further 3 % if open procedure or 1.1 % if restricted procedure Total 2.1 - 4 per cent compared with the initial estimate. PwC, London Economics, Ecorys
- 6. SME access and success By Number of contracts By value of contracts Total 18 22 20 40 Total 6 11 17 66 2008 18 24 20 39 2008 6 13 19 62 2007 18 21 19 42 2007 5 11 15 69 2006 18 22 20 39 2006 6 9 16 69 Micro Small Medium Large Micro Small Medium Large GHK
- 7. Cross border procurement % 16 13,7 indirect cross-border 14 13,9 through affiliates 12,4 12 (value) 11,4 11,7 indirect cross-border 10 11,2 through affiliates 8 (number of contracts) direct cross-border 6 through affiliates 3,7 4 3,2 (value) 3,6 direct cross-border 2 1,6 1,8 1,4 through affiliates 0 (number of contracts) 2007 2008 2009 Ramboll as % of total (above threshold) procurement
- 8. Cross border participation How often did your company participate in public procurement tenders (domestically and abroad) in the last three years? 72,3 Never 0 11,1 1 to 5 7 4,9 5 to 10 6 5,3 10 to 20 10,9 6,4 more than 20 times 76,1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % of respondents Participation abroad N=1011 Participation overall (domestically and abroad) N=1026 Ramboll
- 9. Reasons for not bidding cross border Reasons for not bidding cross-border 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Exchange rate risk 32,5 Administrative requirements 34,2 More resources to tender 34,6 Higher costs 36,6 Legal barriers 47,6 Too much local competition 48,6 Language barriers 50,3 No experience doing business abroad 61,3 Ramboll
- 10. Evaluation: overall conclusion Savings outweigh costs Scope for improving balance of costs and benefits particularly for small contracts Potential for more cross border procurement
- 11. Timetable End June: Publish evaluation results & synthesis of replies to January 2011 Green Paper 30 June: Conference on the Modernisation of EU Public Procurement Policy End 2011: Present legislative proposals
- 12. Total public expenditure Published in Other 2,30 OJEU 3,14 Defence 0,59 VAT on OJEU published Fuel for 0,61 energy 2,46 Below threshold 2,10 Education 0,81 Social Protection Health 4,12 1,18 Eurostat and Commission estimates As % EU GDP (2008)
- 13. Use of procedures 0% 4% 100% 7% 5% 90% 8% Competitive dialogue 14% 80% 9% Accelerated procedures 70% 23% 60% Negotiated without publication 50% Negotiated 40% 73% 30% 52% Restricted 20% Open 10% 0% Number Value Pwc, London Economics, Ecorys from OJEU data 2006-2010
- 15. Evaluation: main findings Effectiveness Relevance Efficiency Consistency with other policies EU added value
- 16. Effectiveness Transparency Competition Savings Cross border Differences in implementation
- 17. Relevance Value for money CPB’s and Frameworks Equal treatment Non discrimination
- 18. Efficiency Positive cost benefit analysis Compliance costs Difference across MS Unintended consequences
- 19. Consistency with other Policies Green public procurement Socially responsible Innovation Lack of monitoring Different requirements, standards, labels…
- 20. EU Added Value Single Market Coordination Still large differences in implementation