Nathan Berchier, Nina Caluori, Anastasiia Kocherga, Elodie Bucciol, Michel de Marsano, Antoine Costa
Corporate Strategy 2014
Xavier Castañer
GALENICA GROUP
28.05.2014
Strategy and context
Where is the value coming from?
Strategic resources & competences
Synergies
Recommendations
Corporate strategy
Team working experience
Agenda
Strategy and Context
Specialty Pharma
International
Swiss HealthCare Services
National
Iron
Deficiency
Infectious
Diseases/OTX
Consumer
Healthcare
Retail Logistics Information
“The Galenica strategy seeks to create long-term growth while distributing risk
effectively…Galenica is active in many different complementary areas creating synergies
for the benefit of all partners in the healthcare industry”.
Stagnating Retail/Logistics market
Price pressure due to new legislation
Strong competition
Very regulated market
High risks associated to drug approval
Growing demand in emerging markets
Context
Strategy
Our analysis shows that Galenica group is over performing pure players by 37%!
Sum of pure players
Where does this value come from?
Chop-shop analysis conclusions
Enterprise
Value
6’901’396
5’055’398
Enterprise
Value
+ 37%
PHARMA LOGISTICS RETAIL HEALTHCARE INFORMATION
Vifor Pharma
OM Pharma
Renal Pharma
Alloga
Galexis
UFD
GaleniCare
Winconcept
Amavita
Sun Store
Coop vitality
Medi Service
HCI Solutions
Documed
E-mediat
LEGAL SERVICES
HUMAN RESOURCES
R&D
CORPORATE FINANCE
PrimaryactivitiesSupportact.
Galenica is active through the whole value chain!
Marketing/
Transport
Operations!
Knowledge of the healthcare market and bargaining power
1.2 Economic synergies
3. Strategic acquisitions
Panpaharma
1957
Hausmann
1983
Aspreva
2007
Sunstore
2009
100% acquisition
that allows
Galenica enter on
the PHARMA
market
Majority in Sunstore allows
Galenica to become a
leader on the Swiss retail
marketEnables the creation
of Vifor Pharma in
2008
Acquisition of Hausmann
laboratories will enable
the development of
Venofer
Financial risk diversification: entering businesses with imperfectly
correlated cash-flows to stabilize the firm’s cash-flow
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1,000.0
1,200.0
1,400.0
1,600.0
1,800.0
2,000.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
HEALTHCARE
INFORMATION
LOGISTICS
Correlation
analysis shows
strong positive
correlation among
all the sectors
except Healthcare
Information!
PHARMA
RETAIL
Are the revenues negatively/poorly correlated? Not really!
Revenues evolution among Galenica’s business sectors
1.2 Financial synergies
Internal Capital Market: capital allocation method within a group that
disperses money through business of the company
Market Growth
Market Share
Logistics
Retail
Pharma Healthcare
Information
The BCG Matrix: Not only capital, but also risk allocation in Galenica’s case
Stable revenues from
Logistics and Retail
enable Galenica to take
risks in highly profitable
PHARMA business!
1.2 Financial synergies
Multimarket contact: meeting the same competitors in multiple
businesses or geo markets
Possibility of mutual forbearance at two levels
PHARMA
Geographical contact Multi-business contact in Switzerland
LOGISTICS & RETAIL
Competitors
Sector
Competitors
Sector
1.3 Mutual Forbearance
Interest alignment
Variable compensation of the CEO: 52% of the salary
CEO as a shareholder: 32% of bonus in shares of Galenica
and holds 0.02% of the stock (1268) in 2012
Effective monitoring
CEO David Ebsworth
27%
9%
3%
62%
Alliance
Boots
Patinex
Alecta
Others
Ownership Concentration (block-holders) Board Independence in 2012
Proportion of independent directors: 6/8
Etienne Jornod Fritz Hirsbrunner
Ex-insiders
1.4 Corporate Governance
1.5 Analyst reports
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: Creation of distinct strategic and operational management
function with Executive Chairman and a CEO reinforced collaboration.
PHARMA: Limited control over launches of Velphoro and Injectafer in the US and
limited visibility + necessity of global reach and scale to market the drug appropriately.
LOGISTICS/RETAIL: The distribution business remains a heavily regulated business and
we operating excellence is key to resist in this market which offers limited opportunity
for margins expansion.
HQ: pressure to optimize processes, leverage synergies and realize cost benefits at
healthcare service providers (launch of COAXIAL).
Bank Vontobel, March 2014 & GlovalData, February 2014
UBS, March 2014 & Marketline, April 2014
UBS, March 2014 & Bank Vontobel, April 2014
Bank Vontobel, March 2014 & GlovalData, February 2014
2.1 Resources and competences
Strategic Resources & Competences Valuable Rare
Difficult to
imitate
Difficult to
substitute
Bargaining Power ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Reputation ✔ ✔ ✔
Human Ressources ✔ ✔
Organizational structure ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Financial support ✔
Control of the value chain ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Iron Knowledge ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
R&D ✔ ✔
Control of the Prewholesale & Wholesale ✔ ✔ ✔
Flexibility ✔
Brand Recognition ✔ ✔
Drug store management knowledge ✔ ✔
Network in Switzerland ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Database leadership ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Coaxial program (informatic) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
HQ
PHARMA
LOGISTICS
RETAIL
HCI
What the strategic resources and competences of Galenica are?
2.2 Synergies
Are these resources shared among businesses to generate synergies?
Strategic resources
& competences
Pharma Logistic Retail Healthcare HQ
Bargaining Power ✔ ✔ ✔ To be reinforced ✔
Reputation ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Organizational structure ✔
Control of the value chain ✔ ✔ To be reinforced ✔
Iron Knowledge ✔
Network in Switzerland ✔ ✔ ✔
Database leadership ✔ ✔
Coaxial program (informatic) ✔ ✔ ✔
Fit 1: Relatedness - Good
Support of the “Pharma” sector by the stability
of the “Logistic” & “Retail” of the Swiss Market
FIT 3
2.4 Synergies
Vertical structure allows
exploitation of synergies
Corporate center provides
support for different
businesses
Incentives related to long-
term performance objectives
Etienne Jornod is
responsible for
corporate culture acros
divisions
Fit 2: Organizational structure – Strong
Active only in the
health industry
(similarity)
Active on the every step
of the value chain
(complementarity)
Fit 3: Sustainability – Good
Risk of cultural instability if Etienne Jornod retires
PHARMA
Remain put: Continue to expand the activity internationally as for Injectofer in the
US market.
LOGISTICS
Remain put: Maintain actual position in Switzerland. Expand internationally in
order to control more of the value chain in foreign countries (US especially).
RETAIL
Remain put: Continue pharmacy acquisition in Switzerland to reinforce position.
Reinforce to other distribution channels (Supermarket for OTC) in Switzerland.
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION
Remain put: Strengthen national position and increase awareness of the services.
3. Recommendations
3.1 International Strategy
Galenica is doing well with this strategy and should continue expanding logistics!
Galenica is already conducting a transnational strategy in PHARMA:
International markets represent the
greatest potential for development
Need for global efficiency
Need for local adaptation
Galenica PHAMA
83%
10%
5% 2%
Switzerland
Europe
USA
Others
Strong relationship with HQ
No geographical divisions
Highly regulated market
Different specifications for drug licensing
HighLow
Low
High
Revenues
The market is stagnating and the
pressure on prices is high
3.2 Corporate development mode
Best corporate development mode for Galenica’s international expansion?
Criteria for
international expansion
Galenica
Goal Global commercial expansion and profitability
Speed/Time to achieve
objective
Related to patent exclusivity and competitors
Galenica value time and reflection for growth development
Control Prefers full ownership for controlling the whole value chain
Risks Imitation/replication of internal strategic resource
Risk diversification on sector fluctuation
Market knowledge/control
Costs Cannot invest high amount in “one shot”
Acquisition
We recommend Galenica to develop through alliance and later through acquisition
3.3 Corporate development mode
Partnerships through alliances
Implementation is faster and easier
Lower start-up cost even on a large scale
Shared risk
Positive experience with Alliance Boots
and Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
But doesn’t have enough global scope
Advantages Disadvantages
Local player can deal with regulation
authorities for new drug applications
Established network
Competition in this industry is already high
Requires a big investment
Risk of winner’s curse
Risk of cultural misalignment
Risk of bad acquisition/ talent loss
Alliance
Advantages Disadvantages
Less control
Risk of partner opportunism
Low partner firm availability
4. Corporate governance recommendations
Remark: Lately voted «Ordinance against excessive compensation in listed
companies» will ultimately increase shareholders’ power and strengthen the
corporate governance
The actual corporate governance is good and does not need major changes
Recommendations
Keep the stability inside the top management to assure the long-term
orientation
Etienne Jornod impersonalizes the culture of the group and is responsible for
strategy and relationships with investors: for the long-term perspective, he
should coach a successor for this strategic role.
5. Group experience
Difficult to propose something as
the strategy is already very good
Difficult to detect which concrete
resources are shared across the
business to generate synergies.
We are not experts of
pharmaceutical market
New positioning relative to annual
reports
Interesting to analyze a completely
new industry for us
Playing “synergies detectives”
Development of the group abilities
Effectiveness of brainstorming
Difficulties Benefits
+_

Galenica corporate strategy analysis

  • 1.
    Nathan Berchier, NinaCaluori, Anastasiia Kocherga, Elodie Bucciol, Michel de Marsano, Antoine Costa Corporate Strategy 2014 Xavier Castañer GALENICA GROUP 28.05.2014
  • 2.
    Strategy and context Whereis the value coming from? Strategic resources & competences Synergies Recommendations Corporate strategy Team working experience Agenda
  • 3.
    Strategy and Context SpecialtyPharma International Swiss HealthCare Services National Iron Deficiency Infectious Diseases/OTX Consumer Healthcare Retail Logistics Information “The Galenica strategy seeks to create long-term growth while distributing risk effectively…Galenica is active in many different complementary areas creating synergies for the benefit of all partners in the healthcare industry”. Stagnating Retail/Logistics market Price pressure due to new legislation Strong competition Very regulated market High risks associated to drug approval Growing demand in emerging markets Context Strategy
  • 4.
    Our analysis showsthat Galenica group is over performing pure players by 37%! Sum of pure players Where does this value come from? Chop-shop analysis conclusions Enterprise Value 6’901’396 5’055’398 Enterprise Value + 37%
  • 5.
    PHARMA LOGISTICS RETAILHEALTHCARE INFORMATION Vifor Pharma OM Pharma Renal Pharma Alloga Galexis UFD GaleniCare Winconcept Amavita Sun Store Coop vitality Medi Service HCI Solutions Documed E-mediat LEGAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES R&D CORPORATE FINANCE PrimaryactivitiesSupportact. Galenica is active through the whole value chain! Marketing/ Transport Operations! Knowledge of the healthcare market and bargaining power 1.2 Economic synergies
  • 6.
    3. Strategic acquisitions Panpaharma 1957 Hausmann 1983 Aspreva 2007 Sunstore 2009 100%acquisition that allows Galenica enter on the PHARMA market Majority in Sunstore allows Galenica to become a leader on the Swiss retail marketEnables the creation of Vifor Pharma in 2008 Acquisition of Hausmann laboratories will enable the development of Venofer
  • 7.
    Financial risk diversification:entering businesses with imperfectly correlated cash-flows to stabilize the firm’s cash-flow 0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1,000.0 1,200.0 1,400.0 1,600.0 1,800.0 2,000.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 HEALTHCARE INFORMATION LOGISTICS Correlation analysis shows strong positive correlation among all the sectors except Healthcare Information! PHARMA RETAIL Are the revenues negatively/poorly correlated? Not really! Revenues evolution among Galenica’s business sectors 1.2 Financial synergies
  • 8.
    Internal Capital Market:capital allocation method within a group that disperses money through business of the company Market Growth Market Share Logistics Retail Pharma Healthcare Information The BCG Matrix: Not only capital, but also risk allocation in Galenica’s case Stable revenues from Logistics and Retail enable Galenica to take risks in highly profitable PHARMA business! 1.2 Financial synergies
  • 9.
    Multimarket contact: meetingthe same competitors in multiple businesses or geo markets Possibility of mutual forbearance at two levels PHARMA Geographical contact Multi-business contact in Switzerland LOGISTICS & RETAIL Competitors Sector Competitors Sector 1.3 Mutual Forbearance
  • 10.
    Interest alignment Variable compensationof the CEO: 52% of the salary CEO as a shareholder: 32% of bonus in shares of Galenica and holds 0.02% of the stock (1268) in 2012 Effective monitoring CEO David Ebsworth 27% 9% 3% 62% Alliance Boots Patinex Alecta Others Ownership Concentration (block-holders) Board Independence in 2012 Proportion of independent directors: 6/8 Etienne Jornod Fritz Hirsbrunner Ex-insiders 1.4 Corporate Governance
  • 11.
    1.5 Analyst reports CORPORATEGOVERNANCE: Creation of distinct strategic and operational management function with Executive Chairman and a CEO reinforced collaboration. PHARMA: Limited control over launches of Velphoro and Injectafer in the US and limited visibility + necessity of global reach and scale to market the drug appropriately. LOGISTICS/RETAIL: The distribution business remains a heavily regulated business and we operating excellence is key to resist in this market which offers limited opportunity for margins expansion. HQ: pressure to optimize processes, leverage synergies and realize cost benefits at healthcare service providers (launch of COAXIAL). Bank Vontobel, March 2014 & GlovalData, February 2014 UBS, March 2014 & Marketline, April 2014 UBS, March 2014 & Bank Vontobel, April 2014 Bank Vontobel, March 2014 & GlovalData, February 2014
  • 12.
    2.1 Resources andcompetences Strategic Resources & Competences Valuable Rare Difficult to imitate Difficult to substitute Bargaining Power ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Reputation ✔ ✔ ✔ Human Ressources ✔ ✔ Organizational structure ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Financial support ✔ Control of the value chain ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Iron Knowledge ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ R&D ✔ ✔ Control of the Prewholesale & Wholesale ✔ ✔ ✔ Flexibility ✔ Brand Recognition ✔ ✔ Drug store management knowledge ✔ ✔ Network in Switzerland ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Database leadership ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Coaxial program (informatic) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ HQ PHARMA LOGISTICS RETAIL HCI What the strategic resources and competences of Galenica are?
  • 13.
    2.2 Synergies Are theseresources shared among businesses to generate synergies? Strategic resources & competences Pharma Logistic Retail Healthcare HQ Bargaining Power ✔ ✔ ✔ To be reinforced ✔ Reputation ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Organizational structure ✔ Control of the value chain ✔ ✔ To be reinforced ✔ Iron Knowledge ✔ Network in Switzerland ✔ ✔ ✔ Database leadership ✔ ✔ Coaxial program (informatic) ✔ ✔ ✔
  • 14.
    Fit 1: Relatedness- Good Support of the “Pharma” sector by the stability of the “Logistic” & “Retail” of the Swiss Market FIT 3 2.4 Synergies Vertical structure allows exploitation of synergies Corporate center provides support for different businesses Incentives related to long- term performance objectives Etienne Jornod is responsible for corporate culture acros divisions Fit 2: Organizational structure – Strong Active only in the health industry (similarity) Active on the every step of the value chain (complementarity) Fit 3: Sustainability – Good Risk of cultural instability if Etienne Jornod retires
  • 15.
    PHARMA Remain put: Continueto expand the activity internationally as for Injectofer in the US market. LOGISTICS Remain put: Maintain actual position in Switzerland. Expand internationally in order to control more of the value chain in foreign countries (US especially). RETAIL Remain put: Continue pharmacy acquisition in Switzerland to reinforce position. Reinforce to other distribution channels (Supermarket for OTC) in Switzerland. HEALTHCARE INFORMATION Remain put: Strengthen national position and increase awareness of the services. 3. Recommendations
  • 16.
    3.1 International Strategy Galenicais doing well with this strategy and should continue expanding logistics! Galenica is already conducting a transnational strategy in PHARMA: International markets represent the greatest potential for development Need for global efficiency Need for local adaptation Galenica PHAMA 83% 10% 5% 2% Switzerland Europe USA Others Strong relationship with HQ No geographical divisions Highly regulated market Different specifications for drug licensing HighLow Low High Revenues The market is stagnating and the pressure on prices is high
  • 17.
    3.2 Corporate developmentmode Best corporate development mode for Galenica’s international expansion? Criteria for international expansion Galenica Goal Global commercial expansion and profitability Speed/Time to achieve objective Related to patent exclusivity and competitors Galenica value time and reflection for growth development Control Prefers full ownership for controlling the whole value chain Risks Imitation/replication of internal strategic resource Risk diversification on sector fluctuation Market knowledge/control Costs Cannot invest high amount in “one shot”
  • 18.
    Acquisition We recommend Galenicato develop through alliance and later through acquisition 3.3 Corporate development mode Partnerships through alliances Implementation is faster and easier Lower start-up cost even on a large scale Shared risk Positive experience with Alliance Boots and Luitpold Pharmaceuticals But doesn’t have enough global scope Advantages Disadvantages Local player can deal with regulation authorities for new drug applications Established network Competition in this industry is already high Requires a big investment Risk of winner’s curse Risk of cultural misalignment Risk of bad acquisition/ talent loss Alliance Advantages Disadvantages Less control Risk of partner opportunism Low partner firm availability
  • 19.
    4. Corporate governancerecommendations Remark: Lately voted «Ordinance against excessive compensation in listed companies» will ultimately increase shareholders’ power and strengthen the corporate governance The actual corporate governance is good and does not need major changes Recommendations Keep the stability inside the top management to assure the long-term orientation Etienne Jornod impersonalizes the culture of the group and is responsible for strategy and relationships with investors: for the long-term perspective, he should coach a successor for this strategic role.
  • 20.
    5. Group experience Difficultto propose something as the strategy is already very good Difficult to detect which concrete resources are shared across the business to generate synergies. We are not experts of pharmaceutical market New positioning relative to annual reports Interesting to analyze a completely new industry for us Playing “synergies detectives” Development of the group abilities Effectiveness of brainstorming Difficulties Benefits +_

Editor's Notes

  • #12 Our conclusions regarding the Galenica’s corporate strategy coincide with the majority of information found in analysts reports
  • #16 Retail: Galenica est deja dans le marché des supermarché avec Coop Vitality. PHARMA: Remain put: Continue to expand the activity internationally as for Injectofer in the US market. Venofer represents 28% of Galenica Pharma sales. Such a percentage could represent a risk however Galenica sales other medicines and demand for iron deficiency products increases. LOGISTICS: Remain put: maintain actual position in Switzerland. Expend internationally in order to control more of the value chain in foreign countries (US especially). RETAIL: Remain put: Continue pharmacy acquisition in Switzerland to reinforce position. Reinforce to other distribution channels (Supermarket for OTC) in Switzerland. The list of authorized medicine in supermarket is growing constantly. Le last update was the March 2014. Do not move to international market before the Logistics strategy. HEALTHCARE INFORMATION: Remain put: Strengthen national position.
  • #17 Recently Galenica has obtained the rights to sell Injectafer in US market. We recommend to continue this commercially-wise strategy in profitable market because according to Alexander & Korine: There are potential benefits for Galenica: Thanks to the strategy to focus the pharma segment on iron products, Galenica has developed a real competitive advantage in the world iron market. Galenica has the necessary management skills The costs outweight the benefits We recommend to pursue the transnational strategy because according to Bartlett & Ghoshal: Galenica needs for a high global efficiency: The relation between the HQ in Switzerland has to be strong and constant. Galenica needs for a high local adaptations: The value chain is located on different continents. However those strategies are limited by the fact that Being in a market highly regulated it could be difficult to obtain licenses to sell
  • #18 Corporate Development Mode: When expanding, a company can choose to develop internally, via venturing / development, or externally, through alliances or acquisition. Choice of the mode principally depends on the importance of several criteria in relation with company’s goal. Which is the best corporate development mode for Galenica’s international expansion?  evaluate relative importance of the criteria regarding company’s goal. Galenica goal in international expansion: Global commercial expansion and profitability Galenica criteria for international expansion: Speed / time to achieve objective: Related to patent exclusivity and competitors but Galenica value time and reflection for growth development. Control: Prefers full ownership for controlling the whole value chain Risks: Imitation/replication of internal strategic resource + risk diversification on sector fluctuation + market knowledge/control Costs: Cannot invest high amount in one shot
  • #19  Regarding Galenica’s business model and risk criteria, acquisition seems to be the best choice for the international development. However, the company cannot directly operate alone on international markets for 2 main reasons: The company need a local player to deal with regulation authorities for new drug applications Galenica cannot distributes widely its products without an established network and competition in this industry is already high But Galenica doesn’t have enough global scope fulfill its goals As Galenica needs strategic resources (local knowledge, network) to ensure a successful international expansion, alliance is highly recommended in early stage of the expansion plan (implementation) But, regarding at the highest strategic goal of Galenica, holding the whole value chain, acquisitions seems to be necessary to fulfill company’s long term objectives, especially in terms of control. Past experiences with Alliance Boots and Luitpold Pharmaceuticals show that the company is used of this type of mode Galenica also uses alliance in the US market through partnership with Luitpold Pharaceuticals. This contract allows the company to submit application for its new drug to the US Food and Drug Administration and assure the distribution on this huge market.