George A. Kelly
Theory Of Personal Constructs
Princy Hannah
LIFE OF KELLY
Birth: Perth, Kansas April 28, 1905
Parents: Theodore Vincent Kelly and Elf Leda Merriam
Kelly
Education: Kelly got his early education from his
parents
Schooling: At 13, he went to high school in Wichita
Degree:
 In 1926 he earned a bachelor degree in Mathematics
and Physics from Park College in Parkville,
Missouri
 Master’s degree in educational sociology from
University of Kansas
 In 1931 he was awarded his PhD for dissertation in
the area of speech and reading disabilities.
Profession:
 During World War II Kelly worked as an aviation
psychologist
 In 1946 he became professor of psychology and director
of clinical psychology at Ohio State University
During this period he produced his cognitive theory, he
travelled worldwide and lectured in many universities.
Kelly died in 1967
Theory Of Personal Constructs
His Explanation Of Personality
According to George Kelly, personality is
composed of the various mental
constructs through which each person
views reality.
Basic Concepts Of Kelly’s
Cognitive Theory
An intellectual hypothesis which we devise
and use to interpret, explain, give meaning
to or predict life events.
Personal Construct
Constructive Alternativism
The assumption that all people are capable of
changing or replacing our present interpretation
of events. We are not controlled by our
constructs but we are free to revise and replace
them with other alternatives.
Each Individual As Scientist
Attempts to predict and control events
Formulate hypothesis about the environment
and test them against the reality of daily life
Observe the events of our life (the facts and
data of our experiences)
Interpret them in our own way
Fundamental Postulate
“A person’s processes are
psychologically channelized by the
ways in which he anticipates
events”.
Corollaries Of Personal
Construct Theory
Construction Corollary
A person anticipates events by
construing their replications.
 Repetition and similarity
 Predictability and anticipation
Individuality Corollary
Persons differ from each other in their
construction of events.
 Differences in interpretation
 On their own experiences
Organization Corollary
Each person characteristically evolves, for his
convenience in anticipating events, a
construction system embracing ordinal
relationships between constructs.
 Interrelated nature of constructs
 Subjective definition of similarities and differences
 Hierarchy and priorities (super ordinates)
Dichotomy Corollary
A person’s construction system is
composed of a finite number of
dichotomous constructs.
 Mutually exclusive alternatives
 Dichotomy
Choice Corollary
A person chooses for himself that alternative in a
dichotomized construct through which he
anticipates the greater possibility for extension
and definition of his system.
 Freedom of choice
 Switching between poles
Range Corollary
A construct is convenient for the
anticipation of a finite range of events
only.
 Range of convenience
 Spectrum of events
 Limits of constructs
Experience Corollary
A person’s construction system varies
as he successively construes the
replications of events.
 Exposure
 Generation of hypothesis and testing it
 Reformulation
Modulation Corollary
The variation in a person’s construction
system is limited by the permeability of the
constructs within whose range of
convenience the variants lie.
 Adaptations
 Permeability
Fragmentation Corollary
A person may successively employ a variety
of construction subsystems which are
inferentially incompatible with each other.
 Competition among constructs
 Inconsistency
Commonality Corollary
To the extent that one person employs a
construction of experience which is similar to
that employed by another, his psychological
processes are similar to those of the other
person.
 Similarity of individuals in interpreting events
 Factors influencing
Sociality Corollary
To the extent that one person construes the
construction processes of another, he may play a
role in a social process involving the other
person.
 Influence of interpersonal relationships
 Anticipation
Criticisms
1)Phenomenological
2)Disregarding the role of emotions
3)Introspection
Decision making
C-P-C Cycle
Circumspection
Pre-emption
Control

George Kelly - Personal Construct Theory- Princy Hannah

  • 1.
    George A. Kelly TheoryOf Personal Constructs Princy Hannah
  • 2.
    LIFE OF KELLY Birth:Perth, Kansas April 28, 1905 Parents: Theodore Vincent Kelly and Elf Leda Merriam Kelly Education: Kelly got his early education from his parents Schooling: At 13, he went to high school in Wichita Degree:  In 1926 he earned a bachelor degree in Mathematics and Physics from Park College in Parkville, Missouri  Master’s degree in educational sociology from University of Kansas  In 1931 he was awarded his PhD for dissertation in the area of speech and reading disabilities.
  • 3.
    Profession:  During WorldWar II Kelly worked as an aviation psychologist  In 1946 he became professor of psychology and director of clinical psychology at Ohio State University During this period he produced his cognitive theory, he travelled worldwide and lectured in many universities. Kelly died in 1967
  • 4.
  • 5.
    His Explanation OfPersonality According to George Kelly, personality is composed of the various mental constructs through which each person views reality.
  • 6.
    Basic Concepts OfKelly’s Cognitive Theory
  • 7.
    An intellectual hypothesiswhich we devise and use to interpret, explain, give meaning to or predict life events. Personal Construct
  • 8.
    Constructive Alternativism The assumptionthat all people are capable of changing or replacing our present interpretation of events. We are not controlled by our constructs but we are free to revise and replace them with other alternatives.
  • 9.
    Each Individual AsScientist Attempts to predict and control events Formulate hypothesis about the environment and test them against the reality of daily life Observe the events of our life (the facts and data of our experiences) Interpret them in our own way
  • 10.
    Fundamental Postulate “A person’sprocesses are psychologically channelized by the ways in which he anticipates events”.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Construction Corollary A personanticipates events by construing their replications.  Repetition and similarity  Predictability and anticipation
  • 13.
    Individuality Corollary Persons differfrom each other in their construction of events.  Differences in interpretation  On their own experiences
  • 14.
    Organization Corollary Each personcharacteristically evolves, for his convenience in anticipating events, a construction system embracing ordinal relationships between constructs.  Interrelated nature of constructs  Subjective definition of similarities and differences  Hierarchy and priorities (super ordinates)
  • 15.
    Dichotomy Corollary A person’sconstruction system is composed of a finite number of dichotomous constructs.  Mutually exclusive alternatives  Dichotomy
  • 16.
    Choice Corollary A personchooses for himself that alternative in a dichotomized construct through which he anticipates the greater possibility for extension and definition of his system.  Freedom of choice  Switching between poles
  • 17.
    Range Corollary A constructis convenient for the anticipation of a finite range of events only.  Range of convenience  Spectrum of events  Limits of constructs
  • 18.
    Experience Corollary A person’sconstruction system varies as he successively construes the replications of events.  Exposure  Generation of hypothesis and testing it  Reformulation
  • 19.
    Modulation Corollary The variationin a person’s construction system is limited by the permeability of the constructs within whose range of convenience the variants lie.  Adaptations  Permeability
  • 20.
    Fragmentation Corollary A personmay successively employ a variety of construction subsystems which are inferentially incompatible with each other.  Competition among constructs  Inconsistency
  • 21.
    Commonality Corollary To theextent that one person employs a construction of experience which is similar to that employed by another, his psychological processes are similar to those of the other person.  Similarity of individuals in interpreting events  Factors influencing
  • 22.
    Sociality Corollary To theextent that one person construes the construction processes of another, he may play a role in a social process involving the other person.  Influence of interpersonal relationships  Anticipation
  • 23.
  • 24.