1
Geotechnical Engineering–II [CE-321]
BSc Civil Engineering – 5th Semester
by
Dr. Muhammad Irfan
Assistant Professor
Civil Engg. Dept. – UET Lahore
Email: mirfan1@msn.com
Lecture Handouts: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/geotech-ii_2015session
Lecture # 23
29-Nov-2017
2
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
ASSUMPTIONS
1. The soil is homogeneous and isotropic.
2. The most critical shear surface is a plane. In reality, it is
slightly concave upward, but this is a reasonable assumption
(especially for the active case) and it simplifies the analysis.
3. The backfill surface is planar (although it does not necessarily
need to be horizontal).
4. There is no friction between wall and soil.
5. The wall is infinitely long so that a representative two-
dimensional section of the wall may be analyzed,
assuming there is no strain in the direction perpendicular
to the section. We refer to this as a plane strain condition.
3
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
If wall AB is not allowed to move 
Shearstress,t
Effective Normal
stress, s’so’Koso’sa’
a
sh’
b
c
s’h = Ko s’o
Stress condition in soil  Mohr’s circle a
If wall is allowed to move away from soil mass
 horizontal principal stress will decrease 
 Circle b  Circle c
4
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSUREShearstress,t
Effective Normal
stress, s’so’
Koso’
sa’A O
D
C
f c
5
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
6
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
7
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
For cohesionless soils, c’ = 0
8
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURE
f
ff
s
s







 




sin1
sin1
2
45tan2
o
a
aK
aaa KczK  2s





 





 

2
45tan'2
2
45tan2 ff
s cza
9
RANKINE ACTIVE PRESSURE
DIAGRAM
aaa KczK  2s
aa K2c-Kz
z
zC
aK2c-aK2c-
Kz a
WALL
WALL
WALL
10
RANKINE ACTIVE PRESSURE
DIAGRAM
aa K2c-Kz
z
zC
aK2c-
WALL
11
RANKINE THEORY OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE
-- DEPTH OF UNSUPPORTED CUT --
aaa KczK  2s
aa K2c-Kz
z
zC
aK2c-
General Case
(c-f soil) 0Cz
aac KcKz  20 
At zC
a
a
c
K
Kc
z



2
a
c
K
c
z



2
Cohesionless Soils
(c’=0)
Cohesive Soils
(f=0)
Ka =
Height of unsupported cut (hC)
 Zero Net force acting on wall

c
zc


2
WALL
hC = Ht. of
Unsupported
Cut
CC zh  2
 s’a = 0
1
12
RANKINE THEORY OF PASSIVE
EARTH PRESSURE
Wall movement
towards soil
Shearstress,t
Effective Normal
stress, s’so’Koso’ sp’A O
D
C
f c
13
RANKINE THEORY OF PASSIVE
EARTH PRESSURE
Derivation: similar to that for active state
For cohesionless soils, c’ = 0
14
RANKINE THEORY OF PASSIVE
EARTH PRESSURE
f
ff
s
s







 




sin1
sin1
2
45tan2
o
p
pK





 





 

2
45tan'2
2
45tan2 ff
s czp
ppp KczK  2s
15
RANKINE THEORY OF PASSIVE
EARTH PRESSURE
ppp KczK  2s
17
RANKINE THEORY
ACTIVE PRESSURE -- SUMMARY --
f
ff
s
s







 




sin1
sin1
2
45tan2
o
a
aK
aaa KczK  2s
a
c
K
c
z



2
18
RANKINE THEORY
PASSIVE PRESSURE -- SUMMARY --
f
ff
s
s







 




sin1
sin1
2
45tan2
o
p
pK
ppp KczK  2s
19
RANKINE THEORY
-- INCLINATION OF FAILURE PLANE --





 

2
45tan
f
ninclinatioplaneFailure 




 

2
45tan
f
ninclinatioplaneFailure
Active Case Passive Case
20
Practice Problem #3
f
ff
s
s







 




sin1
sin1
2
45tan2
o
a
aK
aaa KczK  2s
21
CONCLUDED
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering – (7th Edition)
Braja M. Das
Chapter #13
Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations (7th Edition)
David F. McCarthy
Chapter #17
Geotechnical Engineering – Principles and Practices – (2nd Edition)
Coduto, Yueng, and Kitch
Chapter #17

Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]

  • 1.
    1 Geotechnical Engineering–II [CE-321] BScCivil Engineering – 5th Semester by Dr. Muhammad Irfan Assistant Professor Civil Engg. Dept. – UET Lahore Email: [email protected] Lecture Handouts: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/geotech-ii_2015session Lecture # 23 29-Nov-2017
  • 2.
    2 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE ASSUMPTIONS 1. The soil is homogeneous and isotropic. 2. The most critical shear surface is a plane. In reality, it is slightly concave upward, but this is a reasonable assumption (especially for the active case) and it simplifies the analysis. 3. The backfill surface is planar (although it does not necessarily need to be horizontal). 4. There is no friction between wall and soil. 5. The wall is infinitely long so that a representative two- dimensional section of the wall may be analyzed, assuming there is no strain in the direction perpendicular to the section. We refer to this as a plane strain condition.
  • 3.
    3 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE If wall AB is not allowed to move  Shearstress,t Effective Normal stress, s’so’Koso’sa’ a sh’ b c s’h = Ko s’o Stress condition in soil  Mohr’s circle a If wall is allowed to move away from soil mass  horizontal principal stress will decrease   Circle b  Circle c
  • 4.
    4 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSUREShearstress,t Effective Normal stress, s’so’ Koso’ sa’A O D C f c
  • 5.
    5 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE
  • 6.
    6 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE
  • 7.
    7 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE For cohesionless soils, c’ = 0
  • 8.
    8 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE f ff s s              sin1 sin1 2 45tan2 o a aK aaa KczK  2s                2 45tan'2 2 45tan2 ff s cza
  • 9.
    9 RANKINE ACTIVE PRESSURE DIAGRAM aaaKczK  2s aa K2c-Kz z zC aK2c-aK2c- Kz a WALL WALL WALL
  • 10.
    10 RANKINE ACTIVE PRESSURE DIAGRAM aaK2c-Kz z zC aK2c- WALL
  • 11.
    11 RANKINE THEORY OFACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE -- DEPTH OF UNSUPPORTED CUT -- aaa KczK  2s aa K2c-Kz z zC aK2c- General Case (c-f soil) 0Cz aac KcKz  20  At zC a a c K Kc z    2 a c K c z    2 Cohesionless Soils (c’=0) Cohesive Soils (f=0) Ka = Height of unsupported cut (hC)  Zero Net force acting on wall  c zc   2 WALL hC = Ht. of Unsupported Cut CC zh  2  s’a = 0 1
  • 12.
    12 RANKINE THEORY OFPASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE Wall movement towards soil Shearstress,t Effective Normal stress, s’so’Koso’ sp’A O D C f c
  • 13.
    13 RANKINE THEORY OFPASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE Derivation: similar to that for active state For cohesionless soils, c’ = 0
  • 14.
    14 RANKINE THEORY OFPASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE f ff s s              sin1 sin1 2 45tan2 o p pK                2 45tan'2 2 45tan2 ff s czp ppp KczK  2s
  • 15.
    15 RANKINE THEORY OFPASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE ppp KczK  2s
  • 16.
    17 RANKINE THEORY ACTIVE PRESSURE-- SUMMARY -- f ff s s              sin1 sin1 2 45tan2 o a aK aaa KczK  2s a c K c z    2
  • 17.
    18 RANKINE THEORY PASSIVE PRESSURE-- SUMMARY -- f ff s s              sin1 sin1 2 45tan2 o p pK ppp KczK  2s
  • 18.
    19 RANKINE THEORY -- INCLINATIONOF FAILURE PLANE --         2 45tan f ninclinatioplaneFailure         2 45tan f ninclinatioplaneFailure Active Case Passive Case
  • 19.
    20 Practice Problem #3 f ff s s             sin1 sin1 2 45tan2 o a aK aaa KczK  2s
  • 20.
    21 CONCLUDED REFERENCE MATERIAL Principles ofGeotechnical Engineering – (7th Edition) Braja M. Das Chapter #13 Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations (7th Edition) David F. McCarthy Chapter #17 Geotechnical Engineering – Principles and Practices – (2nd Edition) Coduto, Yueng, and Kitch Chapter #17